The Diary of Thomas Burton: 18 April 1659

Pages 448-463

Diary of Thomas Burton Esq: Volume 4, March - April 1659. Originally published by H Colburn, London, 1828.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.


Monday, April 18, 1659.

I came late, and found the debate, that there should be no general councils without doors, without license, (fn. 1) and the ge neral sense of the House that way inclined. Sir Robert Pye had moved it; and it was ordered before that none should go out. (fn. 2)

Lord Falkland. You have been a long time talking of three estates. There is a fourth which, if not well looked to, will turn us all out of doors. They have not only made resolutions, but have had the impudence to print them. (fn. 3) I am against their meetings, and would have them suppressed.

The House was very full.

Sir John Lenthall moved, and it was ordered that letters be brought in to the Speaker's chair.

Captain Baynes. It is not, judicially, before us that there is an army. Your army is a main ingredient in your government. Lose that, and you lose all. Which one estate soever have that, destroys the other two. I would have it examined, by whose authority this general council came together. I doubt it was by some that, seeing they cannot serve their turns, cry out against them. It is fit we should have our share.

Sir Arthur Haslerigge cried, Well moved. I was in the army, an officer, fourteen years. Now, I am none. I know the grounds of this motion, and go not precipitately to this vote. The late Protector was general for life. I question, if any officer have a legal commission. It may be, the two other estates are courting them. I would have you also to court them, by providing them pay. Before you pass any vote, that implies to make his Highness general, consider whether you will have one general, or several persons. Go upon that which will draw the affections of the army after you.

Mr. Swinfen. The scope of what that gentleman discourses is, that he is against the Protector's being general. His argument is also against your being general. I perceive, by him, the army are divided about who shall be general, before you have determined any thing about it. For that very reason I am against these general meetings. I hope there will be no negative upon this, that no council, while you sit, shall sit without your leave.

They are no military council. This is a council directly contrary from a council of war. It is not known to the laws of war, nor to the laws of the nation. The title of the council runs to meet the title of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland. This will rather be a dishonour to your votes. I see no need of it. The danger is a great deal. It fills the people with fear. People talk, what will become of the Parliament ? It weakens the reputation of the Parliament. After the meeting of the officers, the next may be that of the common soldiers. (fn. 4) Every member has his proper office in political as well as natural bodies. They meet to serve one or other. It is fit you should know them. They are both unnecessary and dangerous.

Mr. Reynolds. I never had any hand in councils without doors. I never went along with them. I abhor the thought of it. I am also against all other councils and meetings, such as were to constitute a Parliament. I would have the grounds of this general council examined. You are upon a tender point, and it must be well handled. When your army was at Saffron Waldon, drawing up hither, I was for tenderness then, and to qualify them with six weeks' pay. They wanted that pay, and you know how your vote was disobeyed. Take heed you take not the thorn out of another's foot, and put it in your own wholly. Let us not disoblige. You dismissed the Quakers (fn. 5) not pleased.

There is nothing disorderly in their debate, nor against this House. I hope they are your favourites.

In matters of this danger or difficulty, I hope you will not go alone, but take in the other House. Appoint a Committee to carry on a conference with the other House. If it had been so dangerous as is represented, surely we should have heard from the other House; they being persons of integrity, and chosen to that purpose.

When the Cavaliers swarm, it is not fit either to disperse, or discontent your army. Ten Cavaliers do you more harm here than forty in the country.

If you pass it, so as to look too fully upon the army, and not at other meetings too, I doubt I shall give my negative to this. If you pass this vote, pass it as generally as you can, and let the other House either begin, or follow you.

Mr. Serjeant MaynÀrd. I am sorry to see wise men so tender in this point. You must not do so much as a mouse. I would have plain English spoken. You give no cause of jealousy. As to the point of pay, you go as fast on as such councils can. I shall not make any inference from those remonstrances. Pluck the wicked out of their places. It comes at last to you. Lord have mercy upon us, if we cannot speak to our army, to go to their stations and their charges, but we must discontent and disoblige them !

If your army be an "ingredient in your government," I hope he (fn. 6) meant better than he spoke; for, if so, they sit among us. It was told you there were but seven officers, I was there when there were eleven, and Mr. Peters (fn. 7) to boot. What work were they doing ? Surely something ? Why should not they go into the country to look to the Cavaliers ? It is said there is a council among us. I cannot believe it, that we do go along with this council without doors.

Mr. Hungerford. You ought not to suffer any without doors to make a descant upon your resolutions. I am for your declaration, and withal to vote that all the persons of the other House that were at that general council, shall be disabled from sitting in the other House this Parliament. I wish you had always done so. Much of your mischief had been prevented, that has come upon you. I wondered to see this remonstrance abroad. (fn. 8)

Mr. Scot. Either there is nothing in it, or more in it than we know: otherwise the gentleman that would have given us an account of their debate would not have been taken down. It is no secret, no new thing, the meeting of the officers.

Is not this to expose your army to assassination, all England over. Disperse them, and you will keep the Cavaliers together.

It can never be policy to distrust those you are obliged to trust. I profess I was no more knowing of what was done to the House in 48. It is a paracelsian (fn. 9) remedy, that may kill as well as cure, I was never at Wallingford House (fn. 10) nor Whitehall since you sat, and why shall I go ?

A Declaration was passed to make the army traitors. Some few of us were against it, and moved how will you bring them to justice unless you will raise another army. You were fain to eat that vote next day.

Confidence is better, in that case, than jealousy. It was Alexander's case. A potion was offered to him, and a letter. He durst not refuse the potion, but gave the physician the letter. (fn. 11) So was his confidence better than his jealousy. There was another instance of a troop that charged without their regiment. They were bid not to be too hasty.

The Protector did not complain of any danger in the petition, when he sent the letter and the remonstrance. The printed paper (fn. 12) says, he read it with all candour.

There is a "good old cause." (fn. 13) If their meetings be, to manage that, I shall not be against them; while their counsels are in subordination to you.

The soldiers sell their arrears at the same rate as debentures.

You deal with them as you do with the Quakers. Because of them, and because of these meetings, you must strengthen the hands of the single person.

I would have a Committee to confer with the other House.

Mr. Steward. I hope it will not be to your prejudice, to prevent their meeting, but for your and their service. Now they have represented their grievances, it must be considered what they meet for. It will concern you.

1. In your honour. The people rumour, as if they were a rod over your heads. Those are the people's apprehensions.

2. In your safety. It was said, your army was a balance. It is vain to endeavour to balance the other two estates. If a fourth estate, it is no balance at all.

3. For your service. That they may be better in their stations. Some of these are a hundred miles off. They may be more serviceable in suppressing the enemy in their own countries. I would have you transact with the other House in this; but not by way of a Committee. Pass this Declaration, and send it there for their concurrence.

Mr. Chaloner. The Protector is to govern by your advice. We have heard nothing of it. I hear commissions are granted. There is no such danger. It was said, when Colonel Bennet went out, (fn. 14) he went to fetch in the army.

Sir Arthur Haslerigge. When I have spoken my mind, I care not what becomes of me. This question is not for your service at this time. I doubt here is more in the bottom of it than appearances. I wish it may tend to the peace of the nation.

It was cried, he had spoke.

I am sorry to see the spirit of this House so freward, as not to have patience to hear men speak. God will not bless it. There is great struggling without doors where the militia shall be. We hear there are endeavours to grant new commissions. How comes it, that you hear not of it ? We go in the dark, and if we go suddenly about it, it may be a bloody vote. I will manifest it to the world, that I have no thing but the public good in my eye. If you be forewarned of it, and do not prevent it, I am discharged.

Let us take in the other House in this great business, lest you pass a vote that may destroy posterity. If ill consequences come, upon a sudden vote, let it not solely proceed from you, lest you bear the blame of all. I abhor all cabals without doors. I am not, nor ever was, of them. Let us have a conference with the other House, and some members of the army, to understand the bottom of this. I hear this general. Council was called by his Highness.

Colonel Terrill. I have looked upon all transactions since 48, as upon a military power. I am as much against the imposing upon you, as any man; but I fear the like consequences as former votes of this kind have had. What power have we to enforce our votes ? Be very wary of proceeding suddenly. Many of the other House are concerned, that know more than we. It does not appear that the army are under any command. I commend their submission. It is a loose army. They cannot be called to any account, as soldiers; but only as private persons. The great end of their meeting is but to choose their masters. I have no such fears as is moved. Therefore the Protector had power to name his successor, but not to name the general. I would have a consultation with the other House by a Committee. Your army is a loose army.

Colonel Birch. All the arguments against it make me for it. I would not have it a bloody vote, and therefore would have it pass. You hear what their discourse is; who shall be their general, or whether they be under any command ? Ill consequences will follow, if unobviated. They cannot but be bloody. That of the army's arrears; I wonder, when I moved it two or three times on Saturday, that the arrears might be included in your vote, those that were so much against it then, are now for it.

Such a paper I have in my hand as never was known. A paper signed by the foot soldiers of Pride's regiment, above three hundred. (fn. 15) Their meeting will be next.

Here are several officers. If they disliked this declaration, they would speak against it; but I hear none.

I desire that you would put it to the question. The paper was a printed petition directed to his Excellency the Lord Fleetwood, and signed by all the foot soldiers, &c. It was never done before: a very ill precedent. If officers begin, soldiers follow.

Mr. Annesley. There is no resentment in his Highness's letter, of the remonstrance, nor of their meeting. If they had not been called by him, why did not he take notice of it ? This should receive our tenderness. Also, I Would have your vote pass by authority. Let nothing go single. Have the concurrence of the three estates in it.

If you restrain public meetings, you must also private, wherein were more danger. If you send them into the country, before you settle where the chief command shall be, this may inflame them in the country, and infuse those principles that are sown abroad.

Let us not part with our share of the militia. The militia is going after the purse. (fn. 16) Refer it to a Committee presently to prepare a question that may save your share in the militia; that your claim may appear, and no implication be, that you intend to give it to another.

The question was put in the affirmative, that during the sitting of the Parliament, there shall be no general council or meeting of the officers of the army, without the direction, leave, and authority of his Highness the Lord Protector, and both Houses of Parliament.

Sir Henry Vane then stood up.

Mr. Lobb standing up, he gave him way. He made a great deal of stuff against the question, and compared sending them to their stations with sending the Quakers home. It was an ill answer to their petition.

Colonel Allured. I cannot in conscience be silent. Will you put away your friends, and hug your enemies ? First, purge your own House of Cavaliers.

Mr. Jenkinson and others moved to name them, or else give satisfaction to the House.

Colonel Allured. I will name them, if you command me. (fn. 17)

Colonel Eyre and Mr. Trevor moved not to interfere at this time with the debate, but, according to the ancient orders of the House, to put it off till this debate was over, and let the expression be entered, and that gentleman will be concerned to name them in a fitter season. So it was waved.

Colonel Allured went on with his motion, and concluded for a conference.

Lieutenant-general Ludlow. I move, not to enrage your friends, and encourage your enemies. Many of the officers are solicitous about that purchase of the forests for their arrears. (fn. 18)

Sir Henry Vane. Those that know the danger better than I, haply may have more reason to press on this vote. This, it may be, is considered on before. I know nothing of it, and therefore must take measure by what is before me.

I am as much against councils without doors as any man. This council has been owned by his Highness. It is said, abroad, his Highness called them. If this general council had raised the single person to be their general, it had been, I doubt, too late for you to debate it here. Before you have determined any thing of the militia, for you to engage in such a vote, I know not what may be the consequence.

If the truth of the matter-of-fact were as represented, you would not be so forward in this vote. I heard it abroad, and from one in the Council Chamber, I am not able to name the person, that the occasion of calling together this council, was by his Highness, on purpose to try the officers if they would take commissions from him, exclusive of the Parliament.

Mr. Trevor and Mr. Bodurda moved that Sir Henry Vane explain those last words, of what he says he heard in the Council Chamber. To amuse the House at the end of a debate, with a report such as this !

Sir Arthur Haslerigge and Lord Lambert moved to ascertain the words before an order for an explanation. They had heard that Commissions have been offered to several officers.

Colonel Okey instanced in one Colonel (Briscoe) who told him that commissions were provided for him and his regiment.

Upon this the debate was waved. I question whether it will come on again.

Lord Lambert. This is a pitiful point. If so, I may say, what, disperse your friends !

He made a long motion against the question, to the same purpose that has been said.

Leave was given to Sir William D'Oyly and Sir Walter Earle to go out.

Mr. Solicitor-general. It is confessed there is danger if they had agreed who should be general. Certainly he (fn. 19) would not have told you this news, unless on good grounds. He says his Highness called them. I hear they were not called by him.

What can be the end of these meetings ? If you suffer this, none knows what may come of it. You know what adjutators (fn. 20) came to. They were hard to be suppressed. We know not what may be at the bottom of these councils.

If we cannot be obeyed in this, we sit to very little purpose. Let us give up the buckler.

I do not imagine but that they will obey. It is the greatest jealousy and reflection that may lie upon them. I cannot believe it. Such meetings as those have not been these eleven years. Surely such an extraordinary meeting must have an extraordinary end.

Mr. Godfrey. I am for the question, but not for the putting it now. (He instanced the case when the Israelites got Jeroboam to head them).

Tumultuous meetings and petitioning I am against. They are but colourable confusions at best. I hope this is not come to that height. When you have passed this vote, you can neither, in honour nor safety to yourself and the nation, recede from it.

I fear, in the consequence, it will prove an allowance of such meetings for the future. To obviate the mischief that may come upon Parliament hereafter, either adjourn the debate till to-morrow, or appoint a Committee.

Sir Thomas Wroth. Let us do like wise men, and make no votes but what we shall be able to give a reason for. I am such a fool that I cannot give a reason for it.

The question was put, that this question be now put.

Mr. Speaker declared for the Yeas.

Mr. — (fn. 21) declared for the Noes.

The Noes went out.

Noes 87. Mr. Chaloner and Mr. Neville, Tellers.

Yeas 163. Mr. Boscawen and Colonel Rossiter, Tellers.

The main question was put and resolved. (fn. 22)

But, before the question was put,

Mr. Bodurda moved, that all the members might be called over.

They came down accordingly. Colonel Allured excepted, for the Noes; but he waved, upon the advice of Sir Arthur Haslerigge, and others.

Mr. Bodurda. I move that you refer it to his Highness to put this vote in execution.

Mr. Swinfen. I move that you put the question, that none be capable of command in the army, until they have subscribed not to give any disturbance to the free meeting and sitting of Parliament.

Mr. Annesley seconded it.

Mr. Jenkinson. I am not against this vote; for it will appear upon your books, that these were the grounds of your former vote, lest you fear force upon you.

Mr. Stephens. For that very reason I am for the question. It is an undoubted breach of the privileges of Parliament for any councils whatsoever to meet, sitting the Parliament.

Colonel Allured. Some members have not right to sit here. I hope you will not restrain them from interrupting such.

Mr. Gerrard. It is not for any soldier to interrupt any member here, whether he have right or no. It must be the Parliament that must judge of that. I wish he would name them.

Mr. Turner. My reason why I was for this question was, lest we be interrupted. It is the talk all over that we shall not be long lived, and that Thursday next was designed for it.

Mr. Godfrey. I fear your vote amounts to a present cashiering of them, by those words "shall not subscribe;" add those words "shall refuse to subscribe."

Colonel Clark. You have no reason for this jealousy. That is the rage of a man. This diffidence of your friends ought to be avoided. Jealousy stirs up jealousy. I had rather have you suspect the Cavaliers. You must lean upon your army for the great part of your safety. A little spark may kindle a great flame. We have known what has become of small beginnings. Leave out the word "Navies."

Lord Falkland. If they mean us well, they will not disobey this. If they mean us ill, it is more than time we should know it.

The way to keep the Cavaliers out, is to— (fn. 23) our friends. The army have done well, it is true; but we cannot but remember they have done ill; pulled us twice (fn. 24) out by the ears.

Mr. Chaloner. I move against the word "Navies." They are at sea and seldom come to land, but with sticks. Make your vote also, that they shall not obey the Chief Magistrate in giving any disturbances.

Mr. Scot. I have not confidence to give my vote without my reason; but it is not for your service to pass this question.

Resolved, that no person shall have or continue in any command or trust, in any of the armies or navies of England, Scotland, or Ireland, or any of the dominions or territories thereto belonging, who shall refuse to subscribe, that he will not disturb nor interrupt the free meetings in Parliament, of any of the members of either House of Parliament, or their freedom in their debates and councils.

Mr. Trevor. I move that his Highness be advised and desired to acquaint the officers with your vote, and that they would repair to their commands. (fn. 25)

Colonel Birch. I move for a Declaration to be speedily brought in, to send the Cavaliers twenty miles from London.

Mr. Turner. The first thing you do, take care to pay the soldiers their arrears.

Captain Clayton. Take off the retrenchment of the pay of the common soldiers, which was taken off three years since.

Lord Falkland. I move that Colonel Allured name the persons, &c. (fn. 26)

Mr. Bodurda. I move that Mr. Stephens, who moved this first, may carry these votes to the other House for their concurrence.

Resolved, that the concurrence of the other House be desired to these votes; and that Mr. John Stephens do carry the same to the other House for their concurrence. (fn. 27)

Mr. Trevor. I move that you do justice to the army, by taking speedy course for the arrears of the army, and providing something for their present subsistence.

Mr. Scot. I move that your Speaker forbear the Chair; and let nothing intervene, if you intend to have any fruits of your Grand Committee.

Resolved, that this House will take into consideration, to-morrow morning, how the arrears of the armies and navies may be speedily satisfied.

Mr. Hewley. It is said we have disappointed our friends, and encouraged our enemies.

I rise to second that motion, that a Committee be ap pointed to prepare a Declaration to require all the Cavaliers to go twenty miles out of town.

Colonel Clark. I would not have the army and the Cavaliers linked together. I am for the question; but put it off two or three days.

It is time to put a stop to the Cavaliers. Sir John Carter, was shot in the shoulder last night by a crew of them. (fn. 28) This is like kissing one's mouth, and biting off the nose.

The House being informed that divers that have been in arms against the Parliament, and other dangerous persons, have resorted of late to the City of London and parts adjacent.

Resolved, that it be referred to a Committee, to propose some effectual way how his Highness, the Parliament, and the nation, may be secured against any attempt from them. viz. Colonel Birch and twenty-eight more, (fn. 29) or any three of them, to meet this afternoon in the Speaker's Chamber, at six.

Resolved, that it be referred to Mr. Serjeant Maynard, Mr. Attorney-general, and Mr. Solicitor-general, to prepare and bring in a Bill for the indemnifying of such persons as have served the Commonwealth.

The House sat till almost five o'clock: so that no Committees sat, save that in the Speaker's Chamber, to prepare a Declaration against the Cavaliers staying in town.

The Committee for lame soldiers met. Lord Fairfax, T. B., and others, and adjourned till Wednesday, at three.


  • 1. "Dr. Thomas Clarges" thus writes "to Lord Henry Cromwell, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland," April 19, 1659. "This last week, our consultations in Parliament were, for the most part, preparatory to matters of accounts, and ended in a resolution to meet yesterday, in a Grand Committee, to consider of our debts, and the present necessities of the armies, and the ways of retrenching the charge of the Commonwealth, and improving the revenues thereof. But before this resolution was put in execution, a motion was made concerning the meetings of the officers of the armies in a General Council, whereby it was said some umbrage was put upon the Parliament." See "Thurloe State Papers," vii. 657.
  • 2. "Resolved, that the door of the House be now shut, and that none of the members of the House go out of the House, without leave in that behalf first obtained. "Colonel Bennet being gone out of the House, before the putting of the foregoing question, it was "Resolved, that Colonel Bennet be required, forthwith, to attend the service of the House. "Colonel Bennet, being returned into the House, stood up in his place, and informed the House, that he went out of the House for the dispatch of some private and particular affairs of his own, which required some haste; and that, having given a dispatch thereunto, he returned of his own accord, to attend his duty and service in the House, without any notice or knowledge of the service of the House for his attendance. With which account, the House rested satisfied." Journals.
  • 3. See infra, p. 462, note ‡. "Mr. Mordaunt" thus writes to "Lord Chancellor Hyde, April 14, 1659:— "The Remonstrance then takes place, though much against Cromwell's will, who told Fleet wood, that it should be suppressed, and however, that he would not recommend it to the House. Upon this, the officers met again, resolving to gain reputation by striking the first blow, printed it by public order from themselves. "The arrears and future securing their pay, gives the greatest rise to the petition, which, at last, Cromwell sent to the House, [supra, p. 379,] and it was read. "Since the petition, private Councils are very frequent; Lord Broghill every day with Pierpoint [supra, p. 274, ad fin.] or St. John. Thurloe keeps close to his principle yet, for all I can perceive, yet I have one observes him near. I wish I may he deceived, and that the advertisement your Lordship had, prove true. If it does, Cromwell may be brought about. "Mr. Henchman, [supra, pp. 424, 425, ad.fin.] will settle in my house, if the King command him; so long, at least, as this affair hangs in suspense." See "Clarendon State Papers," iii. 451, 452.
  • 4. See supra, p. 388, note.
  • 5. supra, p. 446.
  • 6. Captain Baynes, supra, p. 450.
  • 7. Probably as chaplain: see vol. i. p. 244; ii. 346; iii. 110, notes. To Hugh Peters had been entrusted the Library of St. James's. Some of its curious contents are discovered in the following advertisement:— "Tuesday, February 1, 1658–9. Workmen being employed for repairs of the house of St. James's, and some part of the leads over the library there being to be amended, some idle persons and youths took an opportunity to get into the library, where they found good store of medals, some of gold, others of silver, the rest of brass; which, for their rarity and antiquity, had formerly been collected, and were still preserved there. This they took to be treasure, and seized it as prize, divers of them filling their pockets; some of which were apprehended before they could get away, and are since committed to the Gatehouse; by which means, many of the medals are recovered, and more it is hoped, will be. But many are like to be lost, unless such persons as by accident, shall have a view, be pleased to discover them. These are, therefore, to desire all goldsmiths and other persons whatsoever, that in case such things shall be offered to them, they would take care to apprehend the parties, and give notice thereof to Mr. Hugh Peters, at Whitehall." Mercurius Politicus, No. 552.
  • 8. See supra, p. 449, note †.
  • 9. Referring to the daring medical practice of Paracelsus, a very eccentric physician of the sixteenth century.
  • 10. The residence of Fleetwood. Describing the conduct of "Lambert, the great favourite of the army," prior to the calling of this Parliament, Hobbes says:—" He and the rest of the officers had a Council at Wallingford House, where Fleetwood dwelt, for the dispossessing of Richard." Behemoth, (1682,) p. 316; Maseres's Tracts, (1815,) ii. 640.
  • 11. See Plutarch. Sir Richard Steele, in the Tatler, No. 208, proposes this scene, as a fine subject for "a history piece."
  • 12. See supra, p. 449, note †.
  • 13. See Ibid. p. 388, note.
  • 14. See Ibid. p. 449, note *.
  • 15. Six hundred and eighty. See supra, p. 388, note.
  • 16. Referring, I suppose, to the perpetual income of the Protector. See supra, p. 435.
  • 17. Cooper, Annesley, and the other expectant courtiers of Charles Stuart, now his masked representatives in this Parliament, must each have been ready to expect the declaration," Thou art the man!"
  • 18. See supra, p. 413, note‡, ad fin.
  • 19. Sir H. Vane.
  • 20. See Mr. Godwin's Commonwealth, ii. 295.
  • 21. Blank in the MS.
  • 22. See supra, p. 457.
  • 23. Blank in the MS. perhaps, secure.
  • 24. Probably referring to 1648 and 1653. See vol. ii. p. 65, note †.
  • 25. "Dr. Clarges" thus writes "to Lord Henry Cromwell," April 19, 1659.Yesterday, his Highness sent for all the officers of the army, and commanded them to their several charges, to which I hope they will give a ready obedience; but to-morrow was a day they had formerly appointed to meet; and some suspect they will, notwithstanding his Highness's commands or our votes; but I hope and believe the contrary." See "Thurloe State Papers," vii. 658.
  • 26. See supra, p. 457. De te fabula narratur, would have been a suitable answer to this demand. See vol. iii. p. 25, note. Yet Lord Falkland, [supra, p. 449,] could perceive and reprove "the impudence" of the council of officers ! A few days after this daring motion of his Lordship, a spy and agent of Charles Stuart, in London, "Mr. Broderick," thus writes, "to the King, May 4, 1659. "I am employed by my Lord Falkland, Mr. Howe, Mr. John Talbot, Ralph Delaval, and many others, who intend to rise in Oxfordshire, Gloucester, Warwick, and the north, to negotiate for them, and to procure from time to time your Majesty's orders; which, with all loyalty, they will obey." See "An Original," in "Clarendon State Papers," iii. 461.
  • 27. "Dr. Clarges to H. Cromwell, April 19. I am told, the other House was in a great consternation upon receipt of these resolutions of ours, and were so high, as many moved to lay them aside; and it was carried but by one voice in the contrary, which I somewhat admire; for without doubt, if they disagree with us in these, a farther transaction may be doubtful." See "Thurloe State Papers," vii. 652.
  • 28. In "the humble representation and petition of the field-officers and captains of the several regiments of the trained bands of the City of London, presented to his Highness, at Whitehall, April 20" they complain of "that late desperate pistolling of an honourable member of the present Parliament. Mercurius Politicus, No. 563, p. 381."
  • 29. Among these were Sir Henry Vane, and those "good men and true," Mr. Bodurda, Mr. Edward Turner, Lord Falkland, Sir George Booth, and Mr. Annesley.