Close Rolls, Edward I: June 1295

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward I: Volume 3, 1288-1296. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1904.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward I: June 1295', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward I: Volume 3, 1288-1296, (London, 1904) pp. 413-414. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw1/vol3/pp413-414 [accessed 20 April 2024]

Image
Image

June 1295

June 3.
Cardigan.
To Thomas de Normanvill, escheator beyond Trent. Order to cause dower to be assigned to Isabel, late the wife of Thomas de Multon of Gillesland, tenant in chief, as she has taken oath before the king that she will not marry without his licence.
June 11.
Luwel.
To the justice of Chester, or to him who supplies his place. Order to cause a hundred suitable masons experienced in such work as the king is engaged upon at Kaernarvan to be chosen in the town of Chester and in other parts within his bailiwick, and to cause them to come with their tools to Kaernarvan without delay, there to do what Edmund, the king's brother, shall enjoin upon them, as the king needs masons for his works there at once. The justice is ordered to cause the masons to have their expenses from Chester to the aforesaid place.
By K. on the information of Edmund, his brother, by his letter.
Membrane 9.
To the sheriff of Cambridge. It is shown to the king on behalf of John de Wysebech that whereas escapes of thieves ought and have been wont to be adjudged before the justices in eyre and not elsewhere, and the amercements thence arising pertain to the king and to no one else, to be levied for his use by summons of the exchequer, the sheriff of Cambridge, charging John with the escape of four thieves from his custody in the time when he was keeper of the prison of Cambridge, exacts from him 100s. for each escape aforesaid, which have not been adjudged: as the king wills that his right shall not be in any wise derogated from, he orders the sheriff to supersede the demand upon John until it be known by the office of the aforesaid justices whether amercements for the escapes aforesaid ought to pertain to the king, receiving from John security to render to the exchequer the money pertaining to the king for these escapes in case they be adjudged before the justices.
June 19.
Clun (Cloune).
To Malcolm de Harlegh, escheator this side Trent. Order to cause dower to be assigned to Eleanor, late the wife of John de Verdun, tenant in chief, as she has taken oath before the king not to marry without his licence.
To the justiciary of Ireland, or to him who supplies his place, and to Master Thomas Cantok, chancellor of Ireland. Order to deliver to James de Ketyng the lands of the inheritance of Margery de la Rokele, his late wife, to hold for life, if they ascertain that there is such a custom in Ireland as exists in England whereby husbands, after the death of their wives, ought to hold for life the lands that are of their wives' inheritance by reason of offspring begotten between them, as the king learns by inquisition taken by Walter de la Haye, escheator of Ireland, that James begot of Margery a daughter named Roesia, who lived for fifteen days and more and was seen and heard by many, by reason whereof the lands of Margery's inheritance ought to remain to James for his life by the custom used in Ireland as in England, as the escheator asserts.
June 25.
Oswestry (Album Monasterium.)
To Malcolm de Harle, escheator this side Trent. Order not to intermeddle further with the lands that Anselm de Gyse held at his death, and to restore the issues thereof, as the king learns by inquisition taken by the escheator and also by a writ of exchequer that Anselm at his death held nothing of the king in chief by reason whereof the custody of his lands ought to pertain to the king. By p.s. [916.]
June 24.
Oswestry.
To Hugh de Busseye, escheator in co. Chester. Order not to intermeddle further with the lands that Hugh de Dutton, tenant in chief, held at his death of Roger de Monte Alto and the abbot of Vale Royal, as the king learns by inquisition taken by Reginald de Grey, justice of Chester, that from time out of mind, in accordance with a custom hitherto used by a prerogative in co. Chester, the lords of fees after the death of their tenants have the custody of the lands that are held of them by military service during the minority of the heirs of such tenants, although such tenants held other lands in that county or elsewhere of the king in chief, and that Hugh held the manor of Legh of Roger de Monte Alto by certain services, and that he held in like manor of the abbot of Vale Royal the demesne lands and wastes of Dutton, with the woods and waters, and six bovates of land in Dutton by certain services, so that the custody of the said lands pertains to Roger and the abbot during the minority of Hugh's heir, according to the custom aforesaid. By p.s.
Vacated, because otherwise below.
June 26.
Chirk.
To Malcolm de Harle, escheator this side Trent. Order to retain in the king's hands the manors of Goushull and Gedeneye, and not to interfere further with any other lands that Ralph de Goushull held of other lords than the king, as the king learns by inquisition taken by the escheator and also by a writ of his exchequer that Ralph at his death held nothing of the king as of the crown, but that he held the manor of Goushull of the barony of Bayeux and the manor of Gedeneye of the honour of Albemarle, which are in the king's hands, by knight service.
By p.s. [920.]
To the keeper of the office of the escheatry in co. Cumberland. Order to cause Isabel, late the wife of Thomas de Multon of Gillesland, tenant in chief, to have her forty days' use (quarantanam) of the goods and chattels that belonged to Thomas, in accordance with the usual custom.
June 24.
Oswestry.
To the sheriff of Norfolk. Order to deliver in bail George fiz la Persone of Swanton, imprisoned in the gaol at Norwich for the death of Alexander son of William Egeberd of Baketon, wherewith he is charged, as the king learns by the record of William de Ormesby and his fellows, justices lately appointed to deliver that gaol, that George slew him in self-defence and not by felony or malice aforethought.