Addenda, James 1 - Volume 42: October 1620

Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Elizabeth, Addenda 1580-1625. Originally published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1872.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Addenda, James 1 - Volume 42: October 1620', in Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Elizabeth, Addenda 1580-1625, (London, 1872) pp. 627-628. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-state-papers/domestic/edw-eliz/addenda/1580-1625/pp627-628 [accessed 23 April 2024]

Image
Image

October 1620

Oct. 11
London.
19. Sir Rich. Caulveley to Sir Jas. Fullerton, gentleman of His Highness' bedchamber. Pray do not allow any advantage to my prosecutors in my absence. I will repair to Court on the least notice. [¾ page.]
Oct. 16. 20. Arguments on the question whether two barrels of wine found in the main sea, and landed on the fee of Saumares, should belong to the King or the Lord of the fee. The reasons for the Seigneur of Saumares' right are that it appears by ancient records that the lords of that fee have always had one half of goods so found and landed, and the finders the other. It was so adjudged for the Seigneur of Saumares in 1593, against Barnaby Godfrey, who having found a butt of wine in the sea, and landed it upon that fee, claimed the whole, insisting upon the words of the law, Que toutes choses trouvées au bal de la mer appartiennent a linventeur.
His Majesty in 1607, receiving the now Lord of Saumares to do homage for that fee, by patent confirmed to him all the rights and privileges of his predecessors, since which he has often received the moiety of such goods without opposition.
The reasons why the Curator of Saumares should be heard are, that this cause concerns the interest of a man afflicted by the hand of God, who cannot himself defend his right, and therefore deserves favour. The gentleman to whom the care of his affairs is committed is a jurat in the isle, whose attendance is required there during the term, for the public service, and as tutor to sundry orphans, and Curator of Saumares, for managing whose business be cannot depute another. Not long since, upon these suggestions, Mr. Carteret of Vincheles, having failed to appear here upon summons, obtained an order from Council, repealing a judgment made against him by them.
The Curator of Saumares having received a warrant from Sir Hen. Yelverton, then attorney, to appear here, provided a messenger to be sent over instructed in the cause; but hearing of the attorney's sequestration, he stayed the messenger, expecting that if the procurer should procure other Commissioners, a new warrant should be sent, as Mr. Attorney's warrant was only to attend him. Nevertheless, understanding that the procurer proceeded without him, be sent his messenger; he arriving at Southampton the end of July, met the procurer, who told him that his honor had given judgment in his business; the messenger wanting a reexamination of the business whilst the procurer was here, presented a petition to His Majesty, which was referred to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Winchester; but the procurer having then gone over, and the Council not having returned to town, the matter has remained in abeyance. The curator and the wife of the Seigneur of Saumares now petition for a stay of proceedings.
With reference thereon by Secretary Calvert, 19 Sept. 1620, to the Solicitor-General, and his report that this cause and another of the same nature, were referred to the late Attorney-General, and notice given to the parties to attend the reference. That the seigneur appeared, but neither the curator nor any for him, although it is alleged he sent a messenger who lost his way, but of this there is no evidence on oath. The King's procurer attending both causes, the Attorney-General heard the matter debated, but before he resolved upon a certificate, both cases were referred to Sir Hen. Marten and to the writer, who heard the case and certified Council. [1½ pages.]
Oct. 31
Whitehall.
21. The Council to Amice de Carteret, bailiff, and three jurats of Guernsey. John Briard, of Guernsey, having exhibited articles charging Eleazer le Marchant, jurat, of sundry foul misdemeanors, we referred the examination thereof to you on 23 May 1619; but as we have not received any certificate of your proceedings, and are informed that you have not observed our directions, we require you to use no further delay in execution of the commission, to strictly observe our directions, and take care that your proceedings be legal. [1 page.]