Volume A 86: May 1652

Calendar, Committee For the Advance of Money: Part 1, 1642-45. Originally published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1888.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Volume A 86: May 1652', in Calendar, Committee For the Advance of Money: Part 1, 1642-45, (London, 1888) pp. 103-104. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cttee-advance-money/pt1/pp103-104 [accessed 19 April 2024]

Image
Image

May 1652

May 4. Committee for Advance of Money to the County Commissioners for Lancashire. We received yours of 9 December, with depositions against those who had taken part with Charles Stuart; but contrary to our directions, they were taken in a promiscuous way, intermixing divers delinquents in one deposition, and sometimes only examining one witness. We desire you to take further examinations, keeping the persons separate, or publication cannot well be made in one case without naming the rest, and send us up your proofs speedily. With note of like letter for the Commissioners of co. Worcester. [A 25, p. 5.]
May 5.
Penrith.
94. County Commissioners for Cumberland to the Committee for Advance of Money. We send a list of those who were in arms against Parliament in the three wars, and have not compounded nor appeared in the county since, and their estates have lain under sequestration. The following compounded for the second war, viz., John Senhouse of Seascale [see Cases], Jos. Patrickson of the How, and Wm. Patrickson of Weddicar, but were in arms in the third war, and have not appeared in the county since. Their estates, real and personal, are secured. [¾ page.] Annexing,
94.i. List above referred to, viz., Sir Tim. Featherstonehaugh, Kirkoswald; Sir Phil. Musgrave, Bart., Eadnell; Lancelot Walker, Torpenhow; Rob. Whitfield, Randell Holme. [½ page.]
May 7. 95. List of 11 cases on which discharges were granted for delinquents, and of 14 more to be heard on 7 May. [1 page.]
May 7. Committee for Advance of Money to the County Commissioners for Dorset. Having sent you orders for levying sums on persons assessed, we want to know what money you received before 1 December last, and what goods, cattle, or rent you have seized; you are to return to Haberdashers' Hall, not to Goldsmiths' Hall, the moneys so received, and the names of those on whom it was levied. We have much money charged on our receipt which requires present payment. With note of like letters to the Commissioners for cos. Dorset, Lincoln, York, Chester, and Devon. [A 25, p. 6.]
May 8.
Worcester College.
96. County Commissioners for Worcestershire to the Committee for Advance of Money. Rich. Thatcher discovered in 1650 an estate of Thos. Smith, Papist, of Bromsgrove, worth 11l. 18s. a year, and the rent has been paid in ever since; also in 1651 the estate of Wm. Nash, Papist, of Hanbury, worth 17l., which has been since paid in to the State. [1 page.]
May 11.
York.
97. County Commissioners for Yorkshire to the Committee for Advance of Money. We send you our accounts for the 1/5 and 1/20. We paid in more than we received, as Mr. Rymer will tell you at his coming. [½ page.] Enclosing,
97. i. Note by Ralph Rymer of receipts for assessments, 748l. 6s., and repayments, 276l. 9s. 10d., leaving a balance of 471l. 16s. 2d. Also of 500l. and 100l. already paid in. [2/3 page.]
May 12.
Chester.
98. County Commissioners for Cheshire to the Committee for Advance of Money. You ask us to certify our receipts on assessments for the 1/20 before 1 December last. We levied no money on assessments before then, as all the persons whom you ordered us to sequester paid in their moneys at Haberdashers' Hall. The Act [of Pardon] has put a stop to all orders received since. [¾ page.]
May 14. 99. List of cases and reports set down for hearing. [1¼ pages.]
May 14.
Preston.
100. E. Wall to Dallison. When yours of the 7th came, the commissioners had adjourned, and were on business about their accounts and keeping courts on sequestered estates, but I gave it to Mr. Cunliffe. He fears that if the witnesses are re-examined, many will deny what they affirmed, this being often done in composition cases, and he wants to know whether it is needful in all cases, or only in those where only one witness was examined. [1 page.]
May 18. M. Dallison to E. Wall, clerk to the County Commissioners for Lancashire. In answer to yours of the 9th, I do not think that by the letter of the Committee for Advance of Money of the 4th, they wished you to re-examine witnesses already examined, but to take distinct, and not promiscuous depositions. [A 25, p. 7.]
May 29.
Kendal.
101. County Commissioners for Westmoreland to the Committee for Advance of Money. By your order of 13 April, we have examined those who were in arms with Charles Stuart in the last engagement, and sent the examinations, and seized their estates. We will try to find out more.
We intend to send up all the Court rolls, and an account of the moneys received by way of fines. We are in hand with the old accounts, but the work is difficult and takes much time. [1 page.]