The Environs of London: Volume 1, County of Surrey. Originally published by T Cadell and W Davies, London, 1792.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
The name of this parish, in the Conqueror's Survey, is written Cambrewelle; in most of the records of a subsequent date, it is called Camerwell; in Aubrey's time it had regained its former appellation, with the transposition of a letter, being spelt Camberwell; which name it still retains. I can find nothing satisfactory with respect to its etymology; the termination, indeed, seems to point out some remarkable spring; a part of the parish is called Milkwell, and a mineral water was discovered some years ago near Dulwich.
Camberwell lies in the hundred of Brixton, and is situated about three miles from Blackfriars-bridge. The parish is bounded by those of Newington-Butts, St. George-Southwark, and Rotherhithe on the east; by Deptford and Beckenham in Kent on the south; by Croydon, and the detached part of Battersea about Penge, on the west; and by Lambeth on the north. The land is divided in nearly an equal proportion between arable, pasture, and gardens; in the latter I include about 300 acres, occupied by farmers and cowkeepers, which are generally cultivated for garden crops, to supply provisions for their cattle. The soil in general is fertile, and is much improved with manure; which is procured easily, and in great abundance from London. Camberwell alone, exclusive of Peckham, (but including, I apprehend, Dulwich, which is not mentioned in that survey,) is said, in Doomsday, to contain five plough lands. The whole parish is assessed 1301l. 2s. 3d. to the land tax; of which, Camberwell pays 7061. 14s. 9d. Peckham, 531l. 8s. 6d. and Dulwich, 62l. 19s.; the proportion at Camberwell, is 1s. 9d. in the pound; which, in consequence of improvements and new buildings, is about to be lowered to 1s. 6d.; at Peckham they pay 2s. in the pound, which is also about to be lowered; at Dulwich, the proportion is 4s. in the pound.
The district of Camberwell, formerly comprehended one manor only; which was held of the Confessor by Norman, and of William the Conqueror, by Haimo the sheriff; it was valued at 12l. Soon after the Conquest it was divided, and eventually became several distinct manors.
The manor of Camberwell Buckingham's, sometimes called Camberwell and Peckham, which was held of the king in capite, belonged to Robert de Melhent (fn. 1) (natural son of king Henry I.), the first earl of Glocester after the Conquest, to whom it was granted probably by his father. It passed, after his death, with the title, successively to his son William; to John, son of king Henry the Second, afterwards king of England, who married Isabell, one of the daughters and co-heirs of William; to Isabell's second husband, Geoffrey de Mandeville; to Almeric de Eureux, son of Mabel, another co-heir of Earl William; to Gilbert de Clare, son to Amicia, another of the co-heirs; to his son Richard, and to his two immediate descendants, both Gilberts; to Hugh, lord Audley (fn. 2), who married Isabella, sister and co-heir of the last Gilbert. Hugh, earl of Glocester, died in 1347. His daughter and heir, Margaret, married Ralph, the first earl of Stafford, who thus became possessed of the manor of Camberwell, which continued in that family till the attainder of Edward Stafford, duke of Buckingham, in 1521. It was then granted to John Scott (fn. 3), who had been the duke's tenant. His grandson Richard (fn. 4) left the manor between his five sons. Edgar alienated his share in the year 1586 to Edmund Bowyer, Esq. which is now, by inheritance, the property of Joseph Windham, Esq. F. R. and A. S. of Earsham-house, in Suffolk. The other severalties were alienated (about seventy years since) to the Cock family. Matthew Cock, Esq. sold the reversion of them in the year 1756 to William Belchier, who becoming a bankrupt, they were sold by order of the Court of Chancery in the year 1776, and came into the possession of the late John Halliday, Esq. M. P. for the borough of Taunton; and are now the inheritance of his son, a minor.
A fee-farm rent issuing out of this manor, was reserved to the crown when the grant was made to John Scott; it was assigned, among others, to queen Henrietta Maria for life (fn. 5). When the fee-farm rents were sold, in the reign of Charles II. this was bought in trust, for Peter Scott (fn. 6), of whom Mr. Anthony Bowyer purchased the share, which belonged to his severalty of the manor.
The manor of Milkwell, in this parish, belonged to the brethren of the hospital of St. Thomas, in Southwark; who, in consideration of ten shillings annual rent in that borough, granted it to the monastery of St. Mary Overie (fn. 7). Upon the suppression of monasteries, it was granted to Sir Thomas Wyat (fn. 8), who was beheaded by queen Mary. It afterwards belonged to the family of Duke (fn. 9); and was, in 1609, the property of Sir Edward Duke, Knt. (fn. 10); it then contained about four hundred acres of land, part of which was in Lambeth parish. A few years afterwards it was alienated to Robert Campbell (fn. 11). I have not been able to trace its proprietors any lower, or to find in whom the estate is now vested. The manor, which was held of the king in capite, does not at present exist.
The manor of Camberwell Frerne, or Fryern, was part of the possessions of Haliwell priory. It was acquired partly by purchase, and partly by grant (fn. 12). About the reign of king Stephen, Robert earl of Glocester gave one hundred acres of wood to Robert de Rothomago, the latter gave them to the priory. The same earl made several other considerable grants to various persons, particularly to Thomas de Tychesey, and Reginald Pointz; the latter took upon him the cross, and left his estate at Camberwell between his four nephews; one of whom, Nicholas Pointz, gave ten acres of land to the nuns of Haliwell, and they afterwards purchased of him the whole of the share that had been his brother Walter's. Solomon de Basyng bequeathed them some land, called Newelersfeld, and ten acres which had belonged to William Frango. After the dissolution of monasteries, this manor was granted to Robert Draper, page of the jewels (fn. 13), whose daughter married John Bowyer, Esq. of Shepton Beauchamp, in the county of Somerset; and it is now, by descent, and under the will of Edmund Bowyer, who died in 1718, the property of Joseph Windham, Esq. abovementioned.
A fourth manor was constituted by a grant of lands in this parish, from Robert earl of Glocester, to Thomas de Tychesey (fn. 14). From him they descended to Gilbert de Eton (fn. 15), who married Alicia, his sister and co-heir. In the reign of Edw. II. these lands were granted by Thomas de Elyngham, and Roger de Bernham, to John de Owdale (fn. 16), and from him took the name of Dowdale's manor. The Owdales, or Uvedales, were possessed of this estate for many generations. William Uvedale had livery of it in the seventh year of Queen Elizabeth (fn. 17). The manor is not now known, nor can I find in whom the estate is vested.
An inferior manor, by the name of Camberwell, held of Camberwell Buckingham's by the service of a pair of horse-shoes, was the property of the Scotts (fn. 18): Francis Muschamp died seized of it in 1632 (fn. 19); and it descended in the same manner as the Bretinghurst estate, which will be described under Peckham.
The manor of Colde Abbey, held also of Camberwell Buckingham's, was the property of the Scotts (fn. 20), and seems to have descended through the Bowyers, with their other estates, to Joseph Windham, Esq (fn. 21).
The manor of Deptford Strond, which was included in Jane Seymour's jointure, and was afterwards granted to Sir Thomas Pope by Queen Mary (fn. 22), is partly in this parish. It is now the property of Benjamin Way, Esq.
The church is situated near the road which leads to Peckham and Greenwich. It is built of flints and rough stone, and consists of a nave, chancel, and two aisles: at the west end is a small embattled tower, composed of the same materials. A church is mentioned in Doomsday. In Bishop Edindon's Register at Winchester, is a commission dated 1346, for reconciling Camberwell church which had been polluted by bloodshed (fn. 23). The present structure, I imagine, was erected towards the beginning of the reign of Henry the Eighth. The architecture of the windows, and of the arches which separate the nave from the aisles, proves that it could not have been built at a much earlier period; and it is probable that the north aisle was built in 1520, having that date in the east window. The chancel appears to be of the same age; it is of a singular form, being the section of an hexagon. The south-west part of the church was much enlarged in the year 1786.—The new building is of brick.
The east window of the north aisle contains several portraits painted on glass. Aubrey (fn. 24) describes them as a man kneeling at a faldstool, and his ten sons behind him; and a woman kneeling in like manner, with her ten daughters. The window has been much mutilated; the heads, however, of all the men, and nine of the women, remain: some of the principal figures are given in the annexed plate, coloured after the originals. An imperfect inscription is sufficiently entire to inform us, that they were intended to represent the Muschamp family: "....Statu Willmi Muschamp .... et Agnetis ...." The deficiency may be easily supplied from similar inscriptions, which frequently occur on church windows: and it may be rendered, "Pray for the good estate of William Muschamp, and Agnes his wife." The date, 1520, is still preserved. The Muschamps came to England with William the Conqueror.—A branch of that family had been long settled at Peckham. That William and Agnes Muschamp were intended to be represented by the principal figures, is evident: but Aubrey mistakes in supposing that the remaining figures are their sons and daughters. It is very certain, that they are not the children of his wife Agnes, for she died without issue (fn. 25): by his other wives, for he was thrice married, he had a large family; yet not so large as to furnish subjects for twenty portraits. One of the men in the back ground appears as old as the principal figure: I take him to be John Scott, baron of the exchequer, who was brother to Agnes Muschamp; and, I suppose, that some of the men were intended for his sons.
In the same window, are two imperfect figures of female saints; of one, little more than the head remains; the other, with a sword in her hand pointing downwards, is most probably St. Catherine, who is generally so represented. This is the figure about which Stow has so much idle conjecture, supposing it to be intended for queen Elizabeth. At the top of this window are angels holding shields with the arms of the Muschamps, and the families allied with them (fn. 26). In the centre of the window are the arms of Sir Thomas Bond, bart. (fn. 27), with the date 1678. In the north window are the arms of Muschamp quartering Welbeck, and impaling Harmonde or Harman (fn. 28). This aisle was the burial place of the Muschamps, and is still claimed for that purpose by the proprietors of the Peckham estate.
"Lo! Muschas (fn. 29) stock a fruitfull braunch did bringe,
Adornde with vertues fit for ladies brighte;
Sir Thomas Hunt on May day's pleasaunt spring,
Possest the Frowe that was his soules delight:
"His lovely Jane had two sones by Thö Grimes, Esq. and daughters three,
With wealth and vertues meet for their degree.
"When twice seven yeares, six monthes, ten dayes, were spent
In wedlock bands, and loyall love's delight,
November twelfth daye, then she was content
This world to leave, and give to God his right:
Her sixty-three yeares full, complete and ended,
Her soule to God, to earth her corps commended.
In the south wall of the chancel, which I take to have been part of the ancient structure, are two stone stalls, and a niche for holy water, of elegant Gothic architecture: the top of them only is seen, the rest being concealed by some of the wainscot which was put up in 1715 at the expence of Mrs. Katherine Bowyer, widow, who likewise paved the chancel.
Against the same wall is a monument inlaid with brass plates, representing the figures of a man habited in a gown, kneeling, his wife in the same posture, and ten children, to the memory of Richard Skynner, who, as the inscription informs us, died in 1407, and his wife Agnes, who died in 1499. The very singular circumstance of a woman surviving her husband ninety-two years, has created much surprise; but if there had been no error in the dates, the wonder would not cease here, for it would appear that his sons William and Michael (fn. 30), who died in 1497 and 1498, survived their father the one ninety, and the other ninety-one years; and that John Scott, his sonin-law, who died in 1532, survived him 125 years: but to put the matter out of all doubt, Skynner himself was living in 1467, in which year he was bound in a recognizance of 100l. to his taylor (fn. 31); it is very evident therefore, that the engraver of the plate committed a great error; and that Agnes Skynner's widowhood was of no uncommon duration.
In the middle aisle, are slabs with figures in brass of the above-mentioned Michael Skynner, and of William and his wife Isabella; the inscription has been torn from the latter; the date is taken from Aubrey, where it is preserved.
The precatory expressions which formed the beginning and conclusion of almost every epitaph before the reformation, have been carefully obliterated in the inscriptions on the tombs of the Skynners, and others of that age, in the church of Camberwell, either by the reformers in the reign of queen Elizabeth, or by the puritans in the last century: had their zeal been always thus moderate, the antiquary would have no reason to complain of them. Queen Elizabeth checked the ill directed zeal of her reformers by a proclamation (fn. 32), forbidding them "to demolish or deface any monuments, whether of "stone or metal, they being set up for memory, and not for "superstition."
On the north wall of the chancel is a monument to the memory of John Scott, Esq. baron of the exchequer, who died in 1532, with figures on brass of himself, his wife, and eleven children. The arms quartered on the tomb, are Scott and Bretinghurst—they impale Skynner.
The Scotts had been settled for a considerable time at Camberwell. One of that family and description is mentioned in a record of the reign of Edward the Fourth (fn. 33). John Scott was appointed third baron of the exchequer in 1529. His eldest son John I find recorded in Holinshed (fn. 34), on account of some riots and misdemeanors in which he was concerned with Lord Ogle and Lord Howard, for which they were all brought before the Star-chamber. He died in the first year of Queen Elizabeth (fn. 35), and lies buried in the south aisle, which became the burial-place of his family. His brother Edward, who died in 1538, is buried under a flat stone, upon which is a brass plate, with his figure in armour.
Against the wall are monuments to the memory of the abovementioned John Scott the younger, and Bartholomew his son (fn. 36), whose first wife was Margaret, widow of Thomas Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury; Sir Peter Scott, who died in 1622; Peter, his grandson, canon of Windsor, who died in 1689, and his wife Margaret, granddaughter of Dr. Donne, dean of St. Paul's.
In the chancel, is a monument inlaid with plates of brass, representing the figures of a man and woman kneeling at a table with their children, eight sons and three daughters; underneath, is an inscription to the memory of John Bowyer, Esq. who died in 1570, and of his wife Elizabeth, who, after a second marriage to William Foster, died in 1605.
This Elizabeth was daughter of Robert Draper, Esq. of Camberwell. She was married to John Bowyer, Esq. then of Lincoln's Inn, A. D. 1550. Her wedding clothes are thus described in a MS. common-place book belonging to her husband, now in the possession of Joseph Windham, Esq. to whose politeness I am indebted for its communication.
The wedding ring is described as "weying two angells and a ducket," and graven within with these words, "Deus nos junxit J. E. B. Y. R." The date of the marriage is inserted by Mr. Bowyer with great minuteness (fn. 37), and with due regard to the aspects of the heavens, which at that time regulated every affair of importance.
On the south wall of the chancel, is a monument to the memory of Matthew Draper, brother to Mrs. Bowyer. He died in 1577. There are also the monuments of Hester, wife of Sir Edmund Bowyer, who died in 1665; of Anthony Bowyer, Esq. son of Sir Edmund, who died in 1709; and of his wife Katherine, daughter of Henry St. John, of Beckenham, who died in 1717.
In this church are also monuments, in memory of the following persons, which are thus situated: One in the chancel to the memory of Anne, wife of Sir Robert Vernon, clerk of the Green Cloth, who died in 1627; one in the south aisle to the memory of Robert Waith, paymaster of the navy to king Charles II. who died in 1685; Elizabeth his wife, who died in 1667, and Robert his son, who died in 1686; another on one of the pillars which separate the nave from the north aisle, to the memory of Mrs. Joanna Vincent, who died in 1654; and her grandson Vincent, son of Henry lord Blayney, an infant. Aubrey has preserved the inscriptions of a few others, which are now destroyed or obliterated; they were in memory of the following persons: Margaret, wife of John Dove (fn. 38), who died in 1582; Mary Chambers, who died in 1538; Thomas Stacy, vicar of Camberwell (fn. 39), who died in 1527; Robert Maddockes, pay-master of the navy to king Charles II. and William III.; Nehemiah Lambert, schoolmaster, who died in 1700; Jacob Coleby, schoolmaster, who died in 1651; Anthony Stanlake, who died in 1671; and Henry Lyntot, who died in 1600.
The most remarkable tombs in the church-yard, are those of Sir Thomas Gardyner, Knt. who died in 1632; Richard Parr, D. D. who died in 1691; Ichabod Tipping, D. D. who died in 1727; Robert Aylmer, A. M. who died in 1769; (the three last were successively vicars of Camberwell;) of Walter Cock, Esq. who died in 1712; George Roffey, Esq. who died in 1707; Mary, wife of Henry Vogull, Esq. who died in 1775; and Robert Nettleton, Esq. late governor of the Russian company, who died in 1774.
John Henley, of Peckham, by his will dated 1514 (fn. 40), directs, "that his body shall be buried at Camberwell. He bequeaths to "the high altar there, 3s. 4d.; to the image of our Lady, 12d.; "to the child that his wife is withall in her body, 20l.; and if it "happen that the child die before he came of lawful age to marry, "which God forbid, his father to dispose of the money as he should "see fit."
Mrs. Joanna Cock, relict of Walter Cock, Esq. in the year 1717, gave to the parish a piece of land to enlarge their church-yard on the south-west side, in consideration of their paying to her the annual quit-rent of a pepper-corn.
|Average of baptisms.||Average of burials.|
In the last period, Dulwich is included: very little parochial duty was performed there before the present century. It may be ob served, that the burials uniformly exceed the baptisms in a considerable proportion, which is owing to the great number of strangers and nursed children interred in this parish; this happens in some degree in every parish near London; and is the reason why a much more accurate idea of the comparative state of population may be obtained from the average of baptisms, than from that of burials. It appears that the increase of population in Camberwell, within the last two centuries, has been in a ratio of about five to one; within the last hundred years, somewhat more than three to one; so that the village has been uniformly increasing, and at no period so rapidly as within the last ten years. It has the reputation of being healthy, and is a very commodious situation for those persons who, from inclination, or for the benefit of the air, are induced to prefer a country residence, though business calls them daily to the metropolis. In the year 1787, the inhabitants of the parish were accurately numbered; they amounted then to 3762; the present number of houses being about seven hundred and seventy, exclusive of Dulwich college and the workhouse, they may now be estimated at about four thousand. The houses in the Camberwell district alone, are three hundred and seven.
In the early part of the year 1603, the register is defective; from the month of August, to the ensuing April, there were one hundred and thirteen burials; which number, compared with the average of that period, indicates the plague to have been very fatal. The number of burials in 1625, was one hundred and one; in 1665, one hundred and thirty-three; of which number, thirty-three were from Dulwich; by which it appears, that the fatality of that year was not so great as in 1603.
After the restoration, the multitudes of people who flocked to receive the benefits of the royal touch, were immense. Many of them were really diseased; more perhaps came out of curiosity, and not a few for the sake of the gold (fn. 41) which was given to hang about the neck to complete the cure. To prevent any impositions, therefore, and to give his majesty, who had more patients under his hands than any physician in his dominions, a little respite, some restrictions were made with regard to the times of healing, and the number of patients; and all persons who applied for cure, were required to bring a certificate from the minister and churchwardens of their parish, that they had never been touched before, (by which it seems the disease was never to return,) and they were then to go to the king's chirurgeon, whose business it was to examine whether or no they were proper objects; and if he found them so, to give them tickets. A curious paragraph and advertisement, taken from the newspapers of that period, will be found in the note (fn. 42).
The fact here recorded is very extraordinary, and taken in all its circumstances unprecedented, I believe, since the patriarchal ages. Though I have not heard of any instance, upon record, of childbearing at the age above-mentioned, yet there are a few which approach very near it; and some of the most eminent men in the medical prosession are of opinion, that it is neither impossible nor incredible that such an event should happen.
A few months previously to her death, an account of this woman appeared in the St. James's Chronicle (fn. 43), in which it was said, that she retained her faculties perfectly; that she remembered being at service when King Charles II. was crowned; and that the nurse who attended her in Camberwell workhouse, was 101 years of age.
The parish church is dedicated to St. Giles; it is in the diocese of Winchester, and in the deanery of Southwark. The benefice is a vicarage, the rectory being a lay impropriation; it was part of the possessions of Bermondsey Abbey, by the grant of William de Melhent, earl of Glocester, in the year 1154 (fn. 44). The advowson of the vicarage belonged formerly to the Caltons (fn. 45). It was granted, together with the rectory, to Edmund Bowyer, Esq. by Queen Elizabeth (fn. 46), and is now the property of Joseph Windham, Esq. In 1291 the rectory was taxed at twenty-four marks (fn. 47); the vicarage at 61. 8s. 7d.; in the king's books the latter is rated at 20l.
In 1643, Peter Dawson, vicar of Camberwell, shared the fate of many of his brethren of the established church, and was ejected by the Puritans. They substituted in his room Alexander Gregory (fn. 48), who remained there three years; they then put in John Maynard, "an orthodox and godly minister, and one of the assembly of divines (fn. 49);" who proved so unacceptable to the inhabitants, that they presented a petition against him to the committee for displacing improper ministers; but without effect. The rectory was at the same time sequestered, and 50l. per annum out of it was voted to the minister of Ryegate (fn. 50). The sequestration appears to have been afterwards taken off, and the right of presentation restored to Sir Edmund Bowyer; for, in 1658, it was presented to the commissioners appointed to inquire into the state of ecclesiastical benefices (fn. 51), that the rectory of Camberwell was impropriated to Sir Edmund Bowyer, patron of the vicarage, to which he had presented Mr. Richard Parr, and that the profits of the vicarage were about 140l. per annum.
Dr. Parr, who was instituted in 1653 (fn. 52), was chaplain to archbishop
Usher, whose letters he published, with his life prefixed. The
deanery of Armagh, and an Irish bishopric, were offered to him, both
which he refused. In principles, he was a Calvinist; and as a
preacher, so much admired, that, to use Anthony Wood's expression (fn. 53), "he broke two neighbouring conventicles." He published
several sermons and devotional tracts, and died in the year 1691
at Camberwell, where he lies buried in the church-yard. A monument was erected to his memory; on which, after mentioning the
death of his wife, who was daughter to Sir Roger James, Knt. is inscribed as follows:
"Here also lyeth her husband,
Rich. Parr, D. D. vicar of this
place almost thirty-eight years.
"Ob. Nov. 2, 1691.
"He was in preaching, constant; in life, exemplary; in piety and charity, most eminent; a lover of peace and hospitality; and, in fine, a true disciple of Jesus Christ."
In the reign of James I. a free grammar-school was founded in this parish by the vicar, Edward Wilson (fn. 54), and endowed with seven acres of land. The rectors of Lambeth, Newington-Butts, and St. Olave, Southwark; the vicar of Carshalton, the vicar and churchwardens of Camberwell, the patron of the vicarage, (then Sir Edmund Bowyer,) with others, were appointed governors. The above persons and their successors were to have the nomination of the masters, and to appoint new governors as vacancies should happen.
Mr. Henry Cornelisen founded two other charity-schools. Benefactions to the amount of 580l. have been left towards the support of the schools; 500l. of which was a legacy from Mr. Reup. Sir Edmund Bowyer bequeathed to the parish three tenements, and five acres of land; besides which, it enjoys annual bequests to the amount of 61. 13s. 4d. (of which, 4l. was left by Mr. Henry Smith;) and about 435l. in money, bequeathed by various persons.
The hamlet of Dulwich, formerly spelt Dilwysshe, is near two miles from Camberwell, towards the south-west, bordering upon Kent. The situation is pleasant, and very retired, no public road passing through it except to the neighbouring hamlet of Sydenham.
In the year 1739, a mineral water was discovered here in digging a well at the Green Man, then a place of much resort for parties of pleasure from London, now a private house, and lately the summer residence of the present Lord Chancellor. A particular account of the discovery was sent to the Royal Society (fn. 55), by John Martyn, F. R. S. professor of botany at Cambridge. The stratum of the first twenty feet, he says, was clay mixed with vegetable substances; at the depth of forty feet, the clay was intermixed with pyrites and ludus helmontii. The well being sunk to that depth without finding water, was covered up till the next spring, when, upon being opened, they found twenty-five feet of water, of a cathartic quality, much resembling the water of Sydenham Wells, on the Kentish side of the hill.
The first mention I find of the manor of Dulwich is in the year 1127 (fn. 56), when it was given by Henry I. to Bermondsey Abbey. At the suppression of monasteries it was granted to Thomas Calton (fn. 57), and was by Sir Francis Calton alienated to Edward Alleyn, Esq. (fn. 58) in the reign of James I.
Of Dulwich College and its founder many accounts have been published; but they are so replete with errors, that I am happy in having an opportunity, through the politeness of the present members, (by whose permission I have inspected the MSS. in their possession,) to give an account, which I flatter myself will be more satisfactory and accurate.
Edward Alleyn was the son of Edward Alleyn of Willyn, in the county of Bucks (fn. 59); his mother was a daughter of James Townley, Esq. of Lancashire: he was born in 1566, in Allhallows, Lombardstreet; where, in Fuller's time, was the sign of the Pie, near Devonshire house. Fuller says, he was bred a stage player (fn. 60); he certainly went upon the stage at an early age (fn. 61), and soon acquired great celebrity in his profession. Baker (fn. 62), speaking of him and Burbage, says, "they were two such actors as no age must ever look to see the like." Heywood calls him "Proteus, for shapes; and Roscius, for a "tongue (fn. 63)." Fuller says, he was the Roscius of the age, especially in a majestic part. He is spoken of also in terms of the highest commendation as an actor, by Ben Jonson, and others of his contemporaries.
It has been a matter of inquiry, how Alleyn should have made so considerable a fortune in a profession, which, at that time, was not very lucrative even to the most eminent (fn. 64). To account for this, the editors of the Biographia suppose, that he inherited some paternal estate, and that he improved his fortune by marriage. The tradition in the college has always been, that he had three wives; but there is no certain account of more than two. A letter found among his MSS. interspersed with the terms of endearment in which he usually addressed his wife, and directed to E. Alleyn, might assist in giving rise to this tradition: the letter, which is curious, will be found beneath (fn. 65); it was probably intended for his sister, whose name was Elizabeth; the date is 1593; at that period he had been married about a year to Joan, daughter of Agnes Woodward, widow, whose second husband was Philip Henslow, with whom Alleyn was after wards so much connected. It has been always supposed that Alleyn's wife was the daughter of Henslow, and apparently with some reason, for she is not only so termed in her funeral certificate at the Heralds' office, signed by the two senior fellows of the college, but also in the pedigree, signed by himself, wherein his arms are impaled with Henslow. To put the matter however out of all doubt, Mr. Malone, in consulting the MSS. at Dulwich for his edition of Shakespeare, found a memorandum in the founder's own hand-writing, of his marriage with Joan Woodward, in 1592. She died in 1623, and Alleyn married a second wife of the name of Constance: what her surname was, does not appear; but there are strong reasons for supposing that she was a daughter of the celebrated Dr. Donne. It is said in the Biographia (fn. 66), that the founder's arms were upon one of the organ pipes, impaled with, Azure, a wolf rampant ermine. Dr. Donne bore for his arms, Az. a wolf rampant Arg. In the funeral certificate of his son, the wolf is charged with an ermine spot. Dr. Donne had a daughter of the name of Constance, who, at the time of his death, which happened in 1631, five years after that of Alleyn, appears to have been the wife of Samuel Harvey, Esq. (fn. 67); a fact, by no means adverse to the conjecture, which gains additional support from the circumstance of one of her sisters having been settled at Camberwell by her marriage with Thomas Gardyner, Esq. Alleyn, by his will, left to his wife Constance 1600l., and jewels.
Alleyn was sole propritor of the Fortune play-house in Whitecross-street, which he built at his own expence; and which, no doubt, as he was a favourite actor, was a source of considerable emolument. He was likewise proprietor of a bear-garden on the Bank-side (fn. 68), in partnership with Mr. Philip Henslow, long before he obtained the place of master of the king's bears.
Bear-baiting was an amusement so much in fashion in Alleyn's time (fn. 69), that it afforded entertainment to all ranks of people; and his garden, probably, yielded him as much profit as his theatre: it was not licensed, but was so well stocked, that when Sir John Darrington, then master of the bears to Queen Elizabeth, was obliged to exhibit this game to her majesty at a short notice (fn. 70), he applied to Alleyn and Henslow for their assistance. The following is the copy of an advertisement from this bear-garden, preserved amongst Alleyn's papers:
"Tomorrow being Thursdaie, shal be seen at the bear garden on the Bank-side, a greate match plaid by the gamesters of Essex, who hath challenged all comers whatsoever, to plaie 5 dogges at the single beare, for 5 pounds; and also to wearie a bull dead at the stake; and for their better content, shall have pleasant sport with the horse and ape, and whipping of the blind bear (fn. 71).
After the death of Sir John Darrington, the office of "chief master, ruler, and overseer of all and singular his majesty's games, of bears, and bulls, and mastive dogs, and mastive bitches," was granted to Sir William Steward; who refusing to treat with Alleyn and Henslow for the house and bears on the Bank-side, they were induced to purchase his office of him, for the sake of procuring a licence to bait them.
As the nature of this office is little known, it will, perhaps, be
amusing to my readers, to give a short account of it, with copies of
original papers relating thereto. Whenever it was the king's pleasure to entertain himself, or any of his royal visitors, with the game
of bear-baiting, it was the business of the master of the game to provide bears and dogs, and to superintend the baiting: and as this
cruel sport destroyed a great number of the poor animals, he was invested with the most unlimited authority to issue commissions and to
send his officers into every county of England, who were empowered
to seize and take away any bears, bulls, or dogs, that they thought
meet for his majesty's service. This arbitrary proceeding was little
relished by the subjects (fn. 72); and the persons sent to take up dogs, were
frequently ill-treated and beaten, the justices of the peace often refusing to grant them any redress. Some towns, and whole
counties, to avoid these disputes, made a composition with the
master of the bears, to send up a certain number of mastiff dogs
yearly, upon condition, that the commission should never come into
their neighbourhood. Among Alleyn's papers is an engagement
signed by certain persons of the town of Manchester, wherein they
promise to send up yearly, "a masty dogge or bytche to the beargarden, between Mydsomer and Michaelmasse." The master of
the bear-garden, in Queen Elizabeth's time, was allowed to have
public baitings on Sundays in the afternoon (fn. 73); which liberty was
taken away by James I. Alleyn complains much of this in a petition which he presented to the king; in which he also prays for an
increase of salary. The whole petition is curious, and throws so
much light upon the nature and prevalence of this diversion, that I
shall make no apology for inserting it at length; and with it shall
close this digression upon bear-baiting:
"To the king's most excellent majesty, the humble petition of Philip Henslow, and Edward Alleyn, your majesties servants.
"Whereas it pleased your most excellent majesty, after the death of Sir John Darrington, to grant the office of master of your game of bulls, bears, and dogs, with the fee of sixteen pence per diem unto Sir William Steward, Knt.; at which time the howse and beares, being your majesties petitioners; but we not licensed to bayte them, and Sir William Steward refusing to take them at our hands upon any reasonable terms, we were therefore enforced to buy of him the said office, pastime, and fee, at a very high rate; and whereas, in respect of the great charge that the keeping the said game continually requires, and also the smallness of the fee; in the late queen's time, free liberty was permitted without restraint to bayt them, which now is taken away from us, especially on the Sundays in the afternoon, after divine service, which was the chiefest means and benefit to the place; and in the time of the sickness, we have been restrained many times on the working days; these hindrances, in general with the loss of divers of the beastes, as before the king of Denmark we lost a goodly beare of the name of George Stone (fn. 74); and at another "bayting, being before your majestie, were killed four of our best bears, which in your kingdom are not the like to be had, and which were in value worth 30l.; and also our ordinary charges amount yearly to 200l. and better; these losses and charges are so heavy upon your petitioners, that whereas formerly we could have letten it forth for 100l. a year, now none will take it gratis to bear the charges, which is your poor servants undoing, unless your majestie, of your gracious clemencie, have consideracion of us. These causes do enforce us humbly to become suitors unto your majestie, that in respect of the premises, and that we have, ever since your gracious entrance into this kingdom, done your majestie service with all duty and observance; it would please your majestie in your most royalle bounty, now so to relieve us, as we may be able to continue our service unto your majestie as heretofore we have done; and to that end, to grant unto us free liberty, as hath been granted in the late queen's time; and also, in respect of our great and dayly charge, to add unto our said fee, 2 s. and 8 d. being never as yet increased since the first foundacion of the office. And whereas, their are divers vagrants and persons of loose and idle life, that usually wandereth through the country with bears and bulls without any licence, and for ought we know serving no man, spoyling and killing dogs for that game, so that your majestie cannot be served but by great charges to us, fetching them very far; which is directly contrary to statute made in that behalf, for the restraining of such: your majestie would be pleased, in your most gracious favour, to renew unto your petitioners our pastime; and to grant us, and our deputies, power and authoritie to apprehend such vagrants, and to convene them before the next justice of peace, there to be bound with sureties to forfeit his said bears and bulls to your majesties use, if he shall be taken to go about with any such game, contrary to the laws of this your majesties realm; and your poor ser"vants will dayly praye for your majesties long and happy reigne."
Alleyn continued to hold the office of master of the bears till his death, or very near it, at least he is so stiled in the letters patent, for the foundation of the college. He still continued also to be proprietor of the Fortune play-house, though he had for some years retired from the stage (fn. 75). Having acquired a considerable fortune, he determined to bestow it upon a charitable foundation. The story (fn. 76) of his forming this resolution, in consequence of a fright, appears to have been fabricated long after Alleyn's time; as Baker, his contemporary, who mentions the foundation of Dulwich college, and who was too fond of enlivening his history with marvellous narrations to let such a tale pass unnoticed, says nothing of it. Lord chancellor Bacon threw some obstacles in the founder's way; opposed his intentions of settling his estates in mortmain, and was hardly prevailed on to dispense with the statutes which prohibited such settlements. We are informed by the editors of the Biographia, that he wanted the king to consent to settling part of Alleyn's lands on two professorships, then about to be founded in Oxford and Cambridge, by two of his own friends, Sir Henry Saville and Sir Edward Sandys. Having obtained at length the royal assent, Alleyn fixed upon Dulwich as the spot on which to found his college, having purchased an estate there as early as 1606. Here he retired after he left the stage; and having formed his plan, he superintended the erection of the college, lived to see it finished, and spent the remainder of his days at Dulwich, visiting and being visited by some of the most respectable persons in the kingdom. He managed the affairs of the college till his death, not as master as hath been asserted, for he appointed his kinsmen, Thomas and Matthias Alleyn, to be master and warden on the completion of the foundation in 1619, though they did not take upon themselves the management of the college till after his death. It has been said, that after his marriage with his last wife, he repented of what he had done, and wished to revoke his charity; of this there appears to be no proof, nor have I any other to offer in contradiction to it, than his will; by which he appears to be so well satisfied with the foundation, that he augments it with further donations; nor is there any clause by which he excludes other benefactions, which has likewise been afferted.
Alleyn died in November 1626, and was buried in the college
chapel on the twenty-seventh. Aubrey gives the following inscription, from a flat stone over his grave:
"Here lyeth the bodie of Edward Alleyn, Esq. the founder of this church and college, who died the twenty-first day of November, 1626."
It is probable that this inscription was obliterated, and that in substituting the following, which now appears, his age and the dates
were erroneously inserted; for as he was buried on the twentyseventh, it is more likely that he died on the twenty-first, than
the twenty-sixth of November:
"To the memory of
Edward Alleyne, Esq.
"The worthy founder of this college,
"Who departed this life, Nov. 26.
"A. D. 1626. Ætat. 63.
"As likewise of Joan his dear and beloved Wife, Who finished her mortal race, "June 28th, 1623."
Alleyn was sixty years of age at the time of his death, as appears by his diary. Over the inscription are his arms (fn. 77).
As the founder's diary, which is extant, does not commence before 1617, we have no certain account when the building of Dulwich college was begun; the editors of the Biographia say, that the work was in great forwardness in 1614; and they presume, that 8000l. or 10,000l. were expended upon it before the commencement of the diary (fn. 78). The chapel was finished in 1616, and was dedicated on the first of September in that year. The whole form of the dedication, and the prayers used upon that occasion, are in archbishop Abbot's register, and have been printed in Wilkins (fn. 79). Cornelius Lyman, of Chr. Ch. Oxford, was entered fellow of the college the day before, but he was not one of the members at its final establishment in 1619. The deed of foundation is dated April 13, and the letters patent bear date June 21, 1619. The building being finished, and the members of the college appointed, the thirteenth of the September following was fixed on for the solemnity of the foundation; of which the following account is given in Alleyn's own words (fn. 80):
"Sept. 13, 1619. This daye was the foundacion of the college finished; and there were present, the Lord Chancellor; the Lord of Arundell; Lord Coronell Cecill; Sir John Howland, high shreeve; Sir Ed. Bowyer; Sir Thomas Grymes; Sir John Bodley; Sir John Tunstall; Inigo Jones, the king's surveyor; John Finch, councellor; Richard Tayleboys; Richard Jones; John Anthony. They first heard a sermon, and after the instrument of creacion was by me read, and after an anthem, they went to dinner, which was as followeth:
"Two messe of meat
"Capons in whight broth
"Forc't boyld meat
"A chine of beef, rost
"Shoulder of mutton, with oysters
"Rost neates tongues
"So the other messe.
"Wett leche (fn. 81)
"Dry neats tongues
So the other messe.
The whole expence of this entertainment, amounted to 20l. 9s. 2d. Alleyn has inserted in his diary the prices of each article; which, omitting some of the most minute, I have here transcribed. In comparing them with the present prices of provisions, the difference in some articles will be found very striking, in others very trifling.
|"A chine of beef, weighing twelve stone||0||18||0|
|"Twelve neats tongues||0||12||0|
|"Two dry neats tongues||0||4||0|
|"A leg of mutton||0||1||10|
|Six house pigions||0||4||4|
|Eighteen felde pigions||0||4||6|
|Half a hundred of eggs||0||2||0|
|A pottle of great oysters||0||3||0|
|Barbaryes and grapes||0||1||6|
|Carrots, turneps, rosemary and bays||0||0||4|
|Nineteen oranges, and four lemons||0||1||2|
|Pine apple seeds (fn. 82), 40z.||0||0||9|
|Wett suckett, half a pound||0||1||0|
|Lump sugar, 9lb.||0||9||0|
|Gaffornes, quarter of an ounce||0||0||4|
|Two rundlets of claret, containing eight gallons||0||16||0|
|A bottle of canary, five pints||0||2||6|
|Three quarts of sherry||0||2||0|
|Three quarts of whight wine||0||3||0|
|The buck, with warrant and fetching||2||0||0|
|The cooks labor||1||16||0|
|Wheat for meal and flower, eight bushels||2||0||0|
|Thirty pound of butter||0||15||0|
|Two hogshedds of bere||1||4||0|
The college was founded for a master, warden, four fellows, six poor brethren, and six sisters, twelve scholars, six assistants, and thirty out-members. The endowment consisted of the manor of Dulwich, and lands and tenements there; some lands in Lambeth parish; some messuages in the parish of St. Botolph, Bishopsgate; and the Fortune theatre. The revenues amounted to 800l. per annum.
The statutes direct, that the master and warden shall be of the blood and surname of Alleyn; and for want of such, of his surname only: they must be twenty-one years of age, and unmarried. It was objected to Anthony Allen, a candidate for the warden's place, in 1670, that he wrote not his name Alleyn; and he was held to be disqualified on that account; but that objection has been frequently overruled since. Upon the death of the master, the warden succeeds; and a new warden duly qualified, according to the statutes, must be chosen by lot. The salary of the master is 40l. per annum, with an allowance for diet and two hundred faggots; the warden's salary is 30l. with the like allowance. The first master and warden, notwithstanding the clause which forbids their successors to marry, were both married men; their wives were allowed diet from the college; and Matthias Alleyn the warden, being a widower, was allowed to marry again. Some of the succeeding masters endeavoured to avail themselves of this circumstance, and to procure leave from their visitor to marry, but without success; the will of the founder being so clear and explicit upon this head. In Aug. 1681, their visitor expressly commanded, that no woman whatsoever should come to eat at the common table with the society. The fellows are chosen by lot; the statutes direct, that the two seniors shall be masters of arts, and officiate as preachers; the two juniors, graduates and in holy orders, to be school-master and usher; they must all be unmarried; the two seniors are allowed 12l. per annum, their diet, and one hundred and fifty faggots; the juniors, 10l., their diet, and one hundred faggots. Six chanters are also mentioned, of whom the two seniors were to be organists; the four others singing men, their salary 6l. per annum. These chanters are to be found no where but in the statutes; none were appointed by the founder himself at the original establishment of the college, the junior fellow, a layman, being then the organist, and the senior the only preacher, as it has continued ever since. The poor brethren and sisters must be sixty years of age at their admission, and unmarried: there is a clause in the statutes, which excludes any person infected with a noisome disease, or such as are decrepit in their limbs; if they marry, commit fornication, or adultery, they are to be expelled. I do not find that the annals of the college record any expulsions on this account: but very soon after the foundation, a note occurs in the register, "that two of the sisters were expulsed for ungodly unquietness." It is directed by the statutes, that the poor brethren and sisters shall be chosen, as vacancies happen in the college, from the thirty out-members, who are to be of the parishes of St. Saviour, Southwark; St. Botolph, Bishopsgate; and St. Giles's, Cripplegate; ten out of each parish; and are to be lodged in alms-houses which he built, or ordered by his will to be erected for their reception. Not many years after the foundation, the estates of the college being in arrear, and much out of condition, these outmembers were discontinued, and the college received the sanction of their visitor for so doing; but at the visitation in 1677 (fn. 83), the pensions of the out-members were ordered to be paid. The twelve poor scholars are to be six or eight years of age at their admission, and to be educated till they are eighteen; to be taught writing, reading, grammar, music, and good manners; when their school education is completed, they are either to be apprenticed at the charge of the college to some trade or manual occupation, according to their capacities, or to be preferred to the university, where there are to be never more nor less than four. An allowance, which is not particularized, is to be made them for eight years; they are to receive 5l. to defray the expences of each degree, and are to succeed to the fellowships of Dulwich without lot. Isaac Desmevets, in 1692, was allowed 20l. a year by the college whilst he was at the university; but complaining that he was not able to subsist upon it, they increased his allowance to 25l. and gave him 17l. to take his degree of M. A. The expence attending the above establishments, is estimated in the statutes at 600l. per annum; of the remaining 200l. 100l. was to be deposited in the college chest for emergencies, and the other 100l. was to defray the charges of law suits, repairing roads, &c. The churchwardens of St. Saviour's, Southwark; St. Botolph, Bishopsgate; and St. Giles's, Cripplegate; were appointed assistants in the government of the college, and were to attend the audits; and the archbishop of Canterbury was appointed visitor. The assistants right of attending the audits, was confirmed at the visitation in 1635.
At the final establishment of the college, in 1619, Thomas Alleyn, citizen and barber surgeon of London, was appointed the first master, and Matthias Alleyn, of Dulwich, Gent. warden; the fellows were Sam. Wilson, M. A. John Harrison, M. A. Martyn Symmonds, clerk, and Thomas Hopkins, organist.
In 1638, the revenues of the college were so much impaired by the fall of the steeple, which happened July 6th, that it was dissolved, by order of the visitor, for the space of six months; during which time, the master, warden, and fellows received no salary, but the poor people, and the scholars were allowed two shillings a week each. The college seems indeed to have been peculiarly unfortunate in its dilapidations: it was not long after, that the whole of the one side, and part of the other, fell down; and in 1703, the porch, with the treasury chamber, shared the same fate.
During the civil wars, Dulwich college had its full share of the general confusion; the master and warden did not take an active part, but the fellows were in arms for the king; in consequence of which, their fellowships were sequestered, and a school-master and usher only (Stephen Street, and Edmund Colley) were appointed by the ruling powers. In 1646, these two presented a petition to the committee for plundered ministers (fn. 84), that they might have a double allowance for diet, as they stood in the place of the four fellows; their petition was rejected at first, but was afterwards granted, as being consonant to the will of the founder. In 1647, Fairfax's army being then at Putney and Fulham, a company of soldiers, under the command of Capt. Atkinson, was quartered in the college, for which they received the sum of 19 s. and 8d. a poor recompence for the destruction of their organ, and other outrages which the soldiers committed. There is a tradition yet current in the college, that they took up the leaden coffins in the chapel, and melted them into bullets.
In 1649, the rents of the Fortune playhouse being in arrear, the college entered upon the theatre the 21st of November. Both houses of parliament passed an order, July 16, 1647 (fn. 85), for the suppression of plays and play-houses; they continued to act for some time at the Fortune, in defiance of this resolution (fn. 86); but upon the parliament taking more severe measures, and ordering the play-houses to be made unfit for theatrical representation (fn. 87), they were obliged to desist. It was not surprising therefore, that the proprietors of the theatre should be in arrear for rent. At the archbishop's visitation, in 1667, it appeared, that the college had been brought in debt considerably by the fall of the Fortune play-house (fn. 88).
Having applied several times to parliament without redress, the college presented a petition in 1655, setting forth their grievances; and praying that the privilege of electing their own fellows might be restored. Cromwell, by letters patent, dated Feb. 11, 1655–6, appointed Nathaniel Fiennes, one of the commissioners of the great seal, Sir Bulstrode Whitlock, chief justice St. John, General Lambert, and others, commissioners, with full power to visit and settle the affairs of the college; this visitation took place March 19, 1657–8; but the commissioners appointed a new preacher and schoolmaster themselves, instead of restoring the privilege of election to the college. The next year, Elias Alleyn presented a petition to Richard Cromwell, then protector, in which he complained, that notwithstanding the visitation of the commissioners in the preceding year, the abuses of the college were not reformed; and that the master and warden still continued in their evil practices. In consequence of this petition, certain persons were appointed to inquire into the matter, and it came to a hearing at Whitehall; when it was alleged, that the master and warden had alienated lands belonging to the college, to the amount of 200l. per ann. and had applied the money to their own use; that they had sold divers valuable goods belonging to the college, and had aided and abetted the late king by conniving at the fellows being in arms against the parliament: after hearing both sides a report was drawn up, and a copy ordered to be sent to each party, which was never done, and thus the matter ended.
The present master is Thomas Allen; he succeeded to that place in 1775, at which time Mr. William Allen was elected warden; the present fellows are Thomas Jenyns Smith, M. A. Nevile Stow, M. A. John Newell Puddicombe, M. A. and Mr. Richard Dowell, organist.
Dulwich College consists of a front and two wings, which form three sides of a quadrangle; over the door, in the centre of the front building, is the following inscription upon a tablet of black marble:
Primo totius Britanniæ monarcho;
Edward Alleyn, armiger,
Theromachiæ Regiæ præfectus,
Theatri Fortunæ dicti choragus,
Ævique sui Roscius,
Hoc collegium instituit;
Atque ad duodecim senes egenos,
Sex scilicet viros et totidem fœminas
Paremque puerorum numerum alendum,
Et in Christi disciplina et bonis literis erudiendum,
Re satis amplâ instruxit.
Ne quod Deo dicaverat postmodum frustra fieret,
"Diplomate namque regio munitus, jussit
Et a magistro, custode, et quatuor sociis,
Qui et conscientiæ vinculis astricti,
Et sua ipsorum utilitate admoniti,
Rem bene administrarent,
In perpetuum regeretur.
Postquam annos bene multos collegio suo præfuisset,
Dierum tandem et bonorum operum fatur,
VI. Cal. Decris, A. D. 1626.
Beatus ille qui misertus est pauperum,
Abi tu et fac similiter."
The west end of the front building contains the hall, kitchen, and offices on the ground floor; above stairs are the apartments of the master and warden; the east end is occupied by the chapel, a plain unornamented structure; in which is a font inscribed with a Greek anagram (fn. 89). The founder of the college, his wife, and her mother, are buried in the chapel; the inscriptions are in Aubrey (fn. 90). A clause in the statutes permits the master, warden, and fellows to be buried in the chapel, but excludes all others. A cemetery was consecrated at the same time with the chapel; it is situated about a quarter of a mile from the college, near the road to London. The chapel is now frequented by the inhabitants of the hamlet, to whom it serves as a chapel of ease; the parochial duties being performed by the senior fellow.
The baptisms and burials are entered in the college register, which records likewise the succession of the masters, wardens, fellows, and other members; some few historical notes are occasionally inserted, of which I have availed myself in the account of the college. In the first leaf is a memorandum of the music books and instruments left in the college at Mr. Alleyn's death; the instruments were "a lute, a pandora, a cythera, and six vyols." In the earlier part of the register, the burials of the members of the college only appear to be recorded; a few baptisms occur, most of them from Norwood. It was not till towards the latter end of the last century, that the inhabitants of Dulwich, who are near two miles from the parish church, enjoyed the convenience of having the parochial duties performed so near their home.
Anthony Boheme, called in the register, "The Famous Tragedian," was interred in the burial ground here Jan. 10, 1731. He is mentioned by the theatrical biographers, as an actor of considerable eminence. Macklin, who remembers him, says his abilities were over-rated, and that he was a mannerist.
Another actor of less eminence, called in the register "John Eggleton, a player," was buried February 19, 1727: of himself little is remembered; his wife was an actress of merit, and was the original Lucy in the Beggar's Opera: her portrait is introduced by Hogarth in his scene from that play.
The following singular entry appears among the burials in 1768, "Old Bridget, the Queen of the Gypsies, buried August 6th." This Bridget was niece and successor of Margaret Finch, whose history is very curious; of whom, I propose to give some account when I come to treat of the village of Beckenham, where her majesty was buried.
In the west wing of the college which was repaired in 1667, the apartments of the poor sisters occupy the ground floor; over which is the picture gallery, seventy-seven feet long, and fifteen feet six inches wide; the cieling is richly ornamented with stucco, it is in a very ruinous state, and is shortly to be taken down, and the whole of the wing to be repaired or rebuilt.
The contents of the picture gallery have been very cursorily mentioned in all the histories of the college. Aubrey, from whom the succeeding writers on the subject seem to have copied, says, that there are portraits of Henry Prince of Wales, Sir Thomas Gresham, Mary Queen of Scots, and some other worthless pictures: the two latter portraits are not there, and as they are not mentioned in the old catalogue, it may be presumed they never were: of the remaining pictures which are treated with so much contempt, some have much merit, and many are valuable, as being original and unique portraits of remarkable persons: they may be thought therefore to deserve a more particular account. The catalogue which is in the hand-writing of Mr. Cartwright, by whom they were bequeathed to the college, ascertains both their names and prices. Many which are there enumerated do not now appear; perhaps Cartwright had disposed of them before his death: among these was a portrait of "the man who demolished the Earl of Essex with a hatchet in Westminster Abbey;" this destruction, of which an account is given in the notes (fn. 91), was not executed upon his person, but his effigies soon after his interment. The most remarkable of the portraits which remain, are the following:
Michael Drayton, the poet (fn. 92), in a black dress, his own hair short, and a plain band. This cost Mr. Cartwright 15l.
Sir Martin Frobisher, a brave officer, and a distinguished circumnavigator, who discovered the north passage to China. He defended Brest against a superior force of Spaniards; and was knighted for his gallant behaviour in the engagement with the Armada (fn. 93).
The first Lord Lovelace, created by Charles I., who distinguished himself likewise as a naval officer, and took the King of Spain's WestIndian fleet (fn. 94). He was of Hurley in the county of Berks.
Richard Lovelace, the poet, called in the catalogue, "Colonel Lovelace, in black armour." This man was a singular instance of the vicissitudes of fortune. After leaving Oxford, where the beauty of his person, and the variety of his accomplishments, procured him the esteem and admiration of all, he entered into the army; and having faithfully served his unfortunate master Charles I., he afterwards entered into the service of the French king, and was wounded at the siege of Dunkirk; he recovered from his wounds, and returned to England, where he found his beautiful mistress Lucy Sacheverell, who had supposed him dead, married to another; and being obnoxious to the then ruling powers, he was thrown into prison; being afterwards released, he wandered about in rags and poverty; and being broken down both in mind and fortune, died in obscure lodgings in Gunpowder-Alley, Shoe-lane, in the year 1658, and was buried in St. Bride's church (fn. 95). There is a print of him by Faithorn.
A portrait called "the Earl of Exeter," a head painted on board; the title must be a mistake;—there was no Earl of Exeter, before Thomas Cecil; it may be Henry, or Edward, Marquis of Exeter; the former was beheaded in 1538, the latter died 1556.
"Burbage, the actor." Richard Burbadge was a very celebrated tragedian, and a contemporary of Shakspeare. Camden calls him, "alter Roscius;" and Baker speaks of him in the same terms as he does of Alleyn, pronouncing them both to be such actors "as no age must ever look to see the like." He is known to have represented the character of Richard III.; and probably, performed the principal tragic parts in other of Shakspeare's plays (fn. 96). He was a principal proprietor of the Globe and Blackfriar's theatres; and died anno 1619 (fn. 97).
"Nathaniel Field, the actor;" a good portrait. This cost Mr. Cartwright 10l. He is represented dressed in a shirt trimmed with black lace. Field was one of the children of the Chapel Royal: he originally performed women's characters (fn. 98).
"Perkins, the actor." Richard Perkins was one of the performers belonging to the Cockpit, Drury Lane, and is mentioned among those of principal note there (fn. 99): he acted in Shirley's and Heywood's plays (fn. 100). John Webster, the author of a comedy called, The White Devil, or Victoria Corombona, published in 1612, says, in a note, after praising the other actors, "in particular, I must remember the well-approved industry of my friend Master Perkins, and confess, "the worth of his action did crown both the beginning and the end (fn. 101). When the play-houses were shut up during the civil wars, Perkins resided in Clerkenwell, where he died; and was buried some years before the restoration. He wrote a copy of verses prefixed to Heywood's apology for actors.
" Sly, the actor." William Sly was a contemporary of Shakspeare, and was joined with him in the patent of 1603. He is introduced personally in Marston's Malecontent, 1604; and Mr. Malone conjectures, from his there using an affected phrase of Osrick's in Hamlet, that he performed that part. He died before the year 1612 (fn. 102).
|"Mr. Cartwright, sen. the actor."||These pictures cost 15l.each.|
|"Mr. Cartwright, jun. the actor."|
The former of these, whose name was William, was one of the Palsgrave's servants in 1622 (fn. 103). The portrait, which is a very bad one, represents him in a laced band and cuffs. Cartwright the younger, is in a Vandyke dress; of him nothing certain is known: he probably was son to the former. There is a third portrait of a Cartwright, an actor, called in the catalogue, "my own portrait (fn. 104)." This is a good picture by Greenhill: he is represented in a black robe and flowing peruke, with his hand on a dog's head. His name also was William. He was one of Killigrew's company at the original establishment of Drury Lane, where he played Falstaff. This Cartwright, by his will dated September 1686, left his books and pictures, several articles of furniture, and 390 broad pieces of gold, to Dulwich College; but his servants defrauded the College of the greater part both of the furniture and money, of which they received only 65l.
Besides the portraits above-mentioned, there are others of inferior value, and less note; and some other pictures, among which are an head of an old man, which has much merit, by Greenhill; an ancient view of London, said to be by Norden; the head of a woman, by Burbadge the actor, in chiaro-obscuro; some copies from Bassan; a sea view; and many more, which, as Aubrey says, are certainly very worthless.
At the south end of the picture gallery, is the audit-room, where is a good picture of the founder, a full length, in a black gown (fn. 105); a small portrait of a lady, on board, in a dress of scarlet and gold, with a Latin inscription round it; and some other portraits of little value.
Adjoining the audit-room, is a small library, in which are the books bequeathed to the college by Mr. Cartwright. This library formerly contained a very valuable collection of old plays, which were given by the college to Mr. Garrick when he was making his theatrical collection, in exchange for some more modern publications. There still remain some scarce editions of books in various departments of literature, as it may be imagined would be found amongst the stock in trade of a bookseller, who lived in the middle of the last century. The college is likewise in possession of a few curious MSS.; among them is the Founder's Diary, to which I have had frequent occasion to refer, and from which I here subjoin some curious extracts with occasional observations. It commences in September 1617.
|"Oct. 13, 1617. Paid the king's rent for the bank (fn. 106)||13||17||6|
|Nov. 18, 1617. Wine at lady Clarke's at supper (fn. 107)||0||1||0|
|—19,— Wine at lady Clarke's at dinner||0||0||6|
|Dec. 23. A ream of fine paper||0||2||4|
|—31. Went to Suffolk-house|
|Given my lady my silver book|
|Paid for wrighting the verses||0||10||0|
|To Buckett for lyming (fn. 108) it|
|To Mr. Brambel for the glass work||1||2||0|
|The whole value 15l."|
The Earl of Suffolk being at that time lord treasurer, it is probable that Alleyn was soliciting his interest to forward his patent; and it was usual upon such occasions, when a favour was expected from a minister, to make presents to his lady.
|Jan. 1, 1618. Given my lady Clarke a pair of "silk stockings||1||10||0|
|Given Mr. Austen a pair of silk stockings||1||10||0|
|Given Mrs. Austen a pair of gloves||1||10||0|
The fashion of wearing richly embroidered gloves continued a long time: I have seen a pair which belonged to the Duchess of Exeter, Edward IV.'s sister; and they very much resemble the wedding gloves of Mrs. Hampden, wife of the celebrated patriot, which are now in the Earl of Orford's collection at Strawberryhill.
It being much the fashion in Alleyn's time to make new-year's gifts, very numerous entries of such gifts occur at the beginning of each year; consisting of capons, pullets, eggs, cakes, &c.; and sometimes as above, embroidered gloves and silk stockings.
|"Jan. 11, 1618. Given trumpeters on twelfth day||0||2||6|
Dr. Lister was the first physician of his time. Hence it appears, that the practice of deciding on complaints by viewing the water of the patient, was not confined at that time to empirics only. In the March following, Alleyn applied to Dr. Gulson, an eminent physician likewise, to whom he sent only six-pence; the persons who professed this branch of medicine alone, called themselves water-doctors, or water-scrigers. The newspapers of the present day inform us of practitioners in this line, both male and female; some of them have attained great celebrity in their profession, and have practised with great success to themselves at least, if not to their patients, in cases which have been given over by the faculty.
|"Ap. 28. Given Dr. Lister that came to me||-||11||0|
In a book called "Levamen Infirmi (fn. 109)," written in 1700, the usual fees to physicians and chirurgeons at that time, are thus stated: "To a graduate in physick, his due is about ten shillings, though he commonly expects or demands twenty. Those that are only licensed physicians, their due is no more than six shillings and eight-pence, though they commonly demand ten shillings. A surgeon's fee is twelve-pence a mile, be his journey far or near; ten groats to set a bone broke or out of joint, and for letting of blood one shilling; the cutting off, or amputation of any limb, is five pounds; but there is no settled price for the cure."
|Paid for my tawny sattin doublett||1||2||9|
|My whight taffeta doublett||0||13||4|
|"Nov. 11, 1620. Bought of Mr. Gibkin, fourteen heads of Christ our Saviour, and the twelve Apostles, at a noble a piece||4||10||4|
|"December 15. This day I paid for the manor and parsonage of Lewisham||1000||0||0|
Alleyn was right in the fact, but misinformed as to the person. In Dec. 1620, the marquis de Cadenet, brother to the duke de Luines, arrived in England from France, with a great train (fn. 110).
|Mar. 20, 1621. I bought a white horse of Sir Edward Fowler||4||8||0|
The east wing of the college has been entirely rebuilt; it was finished in 1740, and cost the college above 3,600l. In the centre of this wing, on the first floor, is the school-room, and on each side the fellows' chambers, which are spacious and pleasant; beneath are the apartments of the poor brethren.
Behind the college is a garden of very considerable extent, whence the view in the second plate of the college was taken; it ex hibits the south side, consisting of the chapel and the masters apartments.
Peckham, a hamlet in the parish of Camberwell, is situated on the road to Greenwich, a mile from the village, and contains three hundred and seven houses. It appears by Doomsday-book, that it belonged formerly to Battersea.
The manor, which had been held by Alfred of Harold, was granted by the Conqueror to Odo, bishop of Baieux, his half-brother, and was held under him by the bishop of Lisieux. I find it mentioned in only two records, of a subsequent date, as a manor distinct from Camberwell; the first is a grant by Thomas Dolsaly, of the manor of Peckham, which had been given him by Sir John Stonor, senior, to Edward de Barneby, vicar of Camberwell, and John Fauconer, chaplain, and their heirs (fn. 111); this was in the reign of Edward III.; the other is a grant of the same manor to Tipper and Dawe (fn. 112), by queen Elizabeth.
Two manors in Peckham are recorded by the names of Bredinghurst and Basynges; so called, no doubt, from some of their early possessors. The family of Bredinghurst, or Bretinghurst, had property in Peckham in the reign of Edw. I. as appears by Mr. Windham's Court Rolls. The manor belonged to Thomas Wolsely, in the reign of Edw. III. (fn. 113) and at subsequent periods, to Edward Dolshill (fn. 114); and Margaret Bernard, widow (fn. 115). John Scott, Esq. died seizedthereof, 1 Eliz. (fn. 116); it afterwards came to the Muschamps. Francis Muschamp died seized of it in 1632 (fn. 117). Edward Eversfield, who married Mary Muschamp, an heiress, sold the manor to Sir Thomas Bond, in 1672. His son Sir Henry alienated it to Sir Thomas Trevor, afterwards lord chief justice, and created a peer. Lord Trevor, made Peckham his occasional residence. His wife Elizabeth was buried at Camberwell, May 29, 1702 (fn. 118). After his death it was purchased by Mr. Hill, a merchant, from whom it descended to the present proprietor, William Shard, Esq. The manor was held of the king, as of his castle of Dover.
The manor-house is situated near the centre of the hamlet at a small distance from the road leading from Camberwell to Greenwich, on the left hand: it was built by Sir Thomas Bond, in 1672, immediately after he had purchased the estate. Sir Thomas was one of the confidential friends of James II., and left the kingdom upon his abdication of the throne. There is a tradition, that the mob were so exasperated against him, that they plundered his house at Peckham, and were with difficulty restrained from pulling it down. His son, Sir Henry, was receiver-general to James in France, and is mentioned amongst the persons of note who left that kingdom with him, when he made his unsuccessful voyage to Ireland (fn. 119).
The only mention I find of the manor of Basynges is, that Henry Baker died seized thereof in 1557 (fn. 120). It was held of the manor of Camberwell. The family of Basynge had been settled in this parish at a very early period. Solomon de Basynge, who appears to have been sheriff of London in the reign of king John, had possessions there; part of which he bequeathed to the nuns of Haliwell (fn. 121).
At Peckham are meeting-houses for the anabaptists and presbyterians. A congregation of the latter has been long established there, of which Mr. Samuel Chandler was minister, in 1716 (fn. 122) He published a great variety of sermons, and religious tracts; amongst which, besides such as are written in defence of the tenets maintained by those of his own persuasion, are some for which Christianity at large is much indebted to him; particularly "a Vindication of the Christian Religion," of which archbishop Wake, in a letter addressed to him, speaks in terms of high commendation (fn. 123).
A Roman urn of glass was dug up in the middle of the highway at Peckham, about the beginning of this century (fn. 124).
Beyond Peckham, towards Greenwich, lies Hatcham, now a single house; it is described in the Conqueror's Survey to have been in Surrey, and seems to be mentioned as an appendage to Camberwell. It is a manor partly in Kent, and partly in Surrey, and is sometimes called in the Records, Hatcham Barnes. Brixi (who probably gave name to the hundred of Brixton, anciently called Brixistan) held it of Edward the Confessor: at the time of the Survey, the bishop of Lisieux held it of Odo bishop of Baieux. The land was of three carucates, and was valued at forty shillings. It was in the possession of the family of Bavent, as early as the reign of Edward I. when Adam de Bavent had a grant of free warren there (fn. 125), and continued to be their property till the 36th of Edward III. when Hawisne, the widow of Sir Roger Bavent, quitted claim to the priory of Dartford (fn. 126). It was kept in the hands of the crown for some time after the suppression of monasteries, and was leased by Queen Elizabeth to Anne Broke Lady Cobham, in the 42d year of her reign (fn. 127). It was granted by James I. to George Salter and John Williams (fn. 128), and was by them alienated to Peter Vanlore; from him it passed to the family of the Brookes, who sold it, 11 Jac. I., to the Haberdashers' Company of London, as trustees to the charitable bequests left by William Jones, Esq. to the town of Monmouth. Hatcham is assessed the sum of 102l. to the land-tax.