The Environs of London: Volume 2, County of Middlesex. Originally published by T Cadell and W Davies, London, 1795.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
Norden says, that the ancient name of this place was Ensen, or Insen, so called from the sens with which it abounded (fn. 1). I have not met with any authority to support this assertion. Doomsday book calls it Enefelde. The variations in subsequent records are very trifling—Enfeld, Enefield, and Enfield.
Edward I. by his charter, bearing date 1304, granted a licence to Humphrey de Bohun and his wife, (Elizabeth Countess of Holland, the King's daughter,) and their heirs, to hold a weekly market (on Mondays) at Enfield; and two annual fairs, one on St. Andrew's day, the vigil, and the day following; the other for three days also, at the Assumption of the Virgin Mary (fn. 2). James I. granted a weekly market at Enfield, (on Saturdays,) the profits of which were appropriated to the poor of the town. His charter gives the trustees power to build a market-house. The market has been discontinued several years. Two fairs are still held annually; one on St. Andrew's-day, the other on the 23d of September.
King Richard II. granted the inhabitants of Enfield an exemption from toll, and various privileges, which have been confirmed by Henry IV. Henry VI. Edward IV. Queen Elizabeth, James I. the late King, and his present Majesty. An exemption from toll at Ware-bridge was granted by Elizabeth, Queen of Edward IV. These several charters and confirmations are preserved among the parish records.
The town of Enfield is situated about ten miles north of London, and lies within the hundred of Edmonton. The parish is bounded by Edmonton, East Barnet, Hadley, South Mims, Northaw, and Cheshunt; and by the River Lea, which separates it from Walthamabbey in Essex. It contains about 6430 acres of land, exclusive of the Chase; of these about 800 are marsh, 2750 common-field, about 1640 inclosed arable, and about 1240 inclosed pasture. The soil, except on the marsh, is, for the most part, a good loam. The quota paid to the land-tax by this parish is 1292l. 14s. 2d. which, in the year 1793, was at the rate of 2s. 11d. in the pound.
The parish is divided into three districts, each of which has its separate church-warden and overseer, viz. the town-quarter, containing the town, Baker-street, Forty-hill, Clay-hill, the houses on the Chase-side, &c.; Green-street quarter, containing Green-street, Ponders-end, South-street, Enfield-highway, Enfield-wash, and Tuckeystreet; and Bull's-cross quarter, containing Bull's-cross, Bullsmorelane, and White-webbs.
This place gives the title of Baron to the Earl of Rochford, whose ancestor, the first Earl, married Joan, daughter of Sir Henry Wroth of Durants (fn. 3), and was created Baron of Enfield, &c. by King William in 1695.
On the 3d of September 1657, a dreadful fire broke out at Enfield, which consumed several houses; the sufferers had letters-patent for a brief (fn. 4).
Fuller mentions Enfield as being famous for the tanning of hides (fn. 5); there is now one large tan-yard there, belonging to Mr. Vaughan, which is the only manufacture in the parish, except that of marbledpaper, carried on by Mr. Robert Laremuth.
In the reign of Edward the Confessor the manor of Enfield belonged to Asgar, master of the horse. When the survey of Doomsday was taken, it was the property of Geoffrey de Magnaville, or Mandeville, a powerful Norman, who had accompanied King William to England. From his family it descended to Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford, whose mother Maud, was daughter, and eventually heir of Geoffrey de Mandeville, alias Fitzpiers, Earl of Essex, who died anno 1213 (fn. 6). The last Earl of Hereford, of the Bohun family, died in 1371. Eleanor Duchess of Gloucester, his daughter and coheir, died seised of this manor in 1399 (fn. 7); when (notwithstanding she left a daughter and heir, Anne, married to two successive Earls of Stafford) it was inherited by her sister Mary, wife of Henry Duke of Lancaster, afterwards King Henry IV. (fn. 8) The manor being thus vested in the crown, was annexed to the duchy of Lancaster. King Richard III. in the year 1483, granted it to the Duke of Buckingham (fn. 9); but it reverted to the crown the next year by the Duke's attainder. The manor still continues to be parcel of the duchy of Lancaster, though the manor-house and demesne lands have long since been granted away. The manor was leased to Lady Bridget Winkfield in the reign of Henry VIII. (fn. 10) Edward VI. granted it for life to the Princess Elizabeth, afterwards Queen (fn. 11). It is now held on lease by the Chandos family (fn. 12).
The survey of Domesday-book informs us, that the manor of Enfield was taxed, in the time of William the Conqueror, at thirty hides. The land was twenty-four carucates. In demesne were fourteen hides; and the lord had four ploughs. The villeins employed sixteen ploughs. One villein held a hide; three others half a hide each; the parish-priest, a virgate; seventeen villeins, a virgate each; thirty-six others, half a virgate each; twenty bordars held jointly a hide and a virgate; seven cottars held twenty-three acres; and five others, seven acres. There were eighteen other cottars, and six slaves; a mill, which produced ten shillings per annum rent; the fish-ponds, eight shillings. There was meadow sufficient for twentyfour plough-lands; and moreover, twenty-five shillings rent; pasture for the cattle of the town, and pannage for two thousand hogs. The profits of the woods and pasture, forty-three shillings. There was a park also. The manor was valued at 50l. in the time of Edward the Confessor, and bore the same value when the survey was taken. Within the manor were five sokemen, who held six hides, which they had the power of aliening without the licence of the lord paramount. In the year 1303 this manor was valued at 341. 3s. Id. (fn. 13) In a record of the year 1337, its extent and value is thus described: A capital messuage, valued at 13s. 4d.; a garden of herbs, five shillings; the fruit, twenty-pence; a dove-house, five shillings; four hundred and twenty acres of arable in demesne, worth sixpence an acre; sixty-three of meadow, worth three shillings; and thirtynine other acres of meadow, one shilling only; twenty-four acres of pasture, at three shillings; a park called the Frith, whence twenty acres of underwood, worth three shillings an acre, might be sold annually; another called the Great-park, in which was common pasture, and no underwood; the pannage, worth fifty shillings per annum. There were fish-ponds also, whence fish might be sold every seventh year to the amount of fifteen marks (fn. 14). In a subsequent record, anno 1364, only three hundred acres of arable are mentioned among the demesne lands (fn. 15).
A vague and unsupported tradition (fn. 16) asserts, that the ancient manor-house, in the time of the Mandevilles, was situated upon the chase not far from the West-lodge, where is still a moat called Camletmoat. In the year 1347 Humphry de Bohun, Earl of Hereford, had the King's licence to fortify and embattle his manor-house at Enfield (fn. 17). In a meadow called Oldbury, nearly half a mile to the east of the church, and a small distance (on the right hand) from a road called Potter's-lane, leading to Ponders-end, is the site of an ancient mansion, surrounded by a wide and deep moat with high embankments; the external dimensions of the moat are about one hundred and sixty yards by one hundred and thirty-five; on the north side it is about thirty-two yards in width. The dimensions of the internal parallelogram are about ninety-six yards by forty; at the north-west corner is an eminence which appears like the keep of a castle. I think it not improbable, that this moated place, (which was included among some demesne lands alienated in the last cen tury,) might have been the site of Humphry de Bohun's castle, and that when the manerial residence was removed, it acquired the name of Oldbury. The site of the manor of Enfield was leased, anno 1526, to Roger Barker (fn. 18); and a short time afterwards to John Taylor (fn. 19). The lease seems to have reverted to the crown about the latter end of Henry VIII.'s reign, and the house to have been in the King's own hands. In the year 1543, "on new-year's day, the noble Scottish prisoners departed from London towards Scotland, and roade to Enfield to see the Prince, and dined there that day, greatly rejoicing, as by their words and countenance it seemed, to beholde so proper and towardly an Ympe (fn. 20)." At the time of Henry's death, the Princess Elizabeth was residing at Enfield, and her brother at Hertford, whence he was brought the next day to Enfield. There he was first acquainted with the King's death, and there he kept his court till the last day of June, when he removed to London (fn. 21).
It appears that the manor-house underwent very considerble repairs, or perhaps was wholly rebuilt in the reign of Edward VI. and most probably upon occasion of the manor being granted to the Princess Elizabeth. Notwithstanding the great alteration which this house has lately undergone, one of the rooms still remains in its original state, with oak pannels and a richly-ornamented cieling. The chimney-piece is supported by columns of the Ionic and Corinthian order, and decorated with the cognizances of the rose and portcullis, and the arms of France and England quartered, with the garter and the royal supporters, a lion and a gryphon. Underneath is this motto: Sola salus servire Deo, sunt cÆtera fraudes. In the same room is preserved part of another chimney-piece, removed from one of the upper apartments, with nearly the same ornaments; and the following motto: Ut ros super herbam, est benevolentia regis, alluding, it is probable, to the royal grant. Among the collection of royal letters in the British Museum (fn. 22), is one in Latin from the Princess Elizabeth, dated Enfield; and in the Bodleian library there is preserved a MS. copy of a sermon, translated by the Princess, from the Italian of Occhini. It is written on vellum, with her own hand, and was sent as a new-year's gift to her brother, King Edward. The dedication is dated Enfield, Dec. 30; the year is not mentioned. When the Princess Elizabeth became Queen, she frequently visited Enfield, and kept her court there in the early part of her reign (fn. 23). Robert Carey, Earl of Monmouth, speaking of events which happened anno 1596, says, the Queen came to dinner to Enfield-house, and had toils set up in the park, to shoot at bucks after dinner (fn. 24). The park here meant was undoubtedly the New-park, and the house Elsynge-hall, otherwise called Enfield-house, which was then in the hands of the crown (fn. 25); whereas it appears, that the Queen had leased the manor-house, anno 1582, to Henry Myddlemore, Esq. for fifty-one years (fn. 26), and that it did not revert to the crown during her reign. This will account for Camden and Norden saying, that the Queen's palace at Enfield was built by an Earl of Worcester. From 1600 to 1623 the manor-house seems to have been in the tenure of Lord William Howard (fn. 27). Charles I. anno 1629, granted in see the reversion both of the house and demesne lands, after the expiration of Myddlemore's lease, to Edward Ditchfield and others, trustees for the city of London (fn. 28), who conveyed the whole soon afterwards to Sir Nicholas Raynton, Knt. (fn. 29) Sir Nicholas let the house to Sir Thomas Trevor, one of the Barons of the Exchequer, in whose tenure it appears to have been from the year 1635 till his death (fn. 30), which happened in 1656 (fn. 31). About the year 1670 it was taken by Mr. Robert Uvedale, (afterwards LL. D.) master of the grammar-school (fn. 32), who being much attached to the study of botany (fn. 33), had a very curious garden there, and planted, among other trees, a cedar of Libanus, now one of the finest in the kingdom, and measuring, at three feet from the ground, twelve feet in girth (fn. 34). The manor-house, with the demesne lands, de scended from Sir Nicholas Raynton, by intermarriages, to the late Eliab Breton, Esq. after whose death (his estates having been sold in lots by public auction) the house was purchased by Mr. Thomas Callaway, steward of Guy's-hospital. It has been, in a great measure, new-built, and has been divided into tenements; the part which contains the old room, is in the occupation of Mrs. Perry. The annexed view was taken in the month of July 1793, since which time, th side of the house there shown, (being the only part which then remained in its original state,) has been new-fronted.
Enfield-chase is mentioned by that name in a record of the reign of Edward II. (fn. 35) before which time it was generally called the Greatpark, and parcus extrinsecus, or the Outer-park. The chase having been seized as crown-land after the death of Charles I. it was surveyed by order of the house of commons in the year 1650, when its extent was reported to be 7904 acres, and its value 4742l. 8s. per annum. The deer were valued at 1501.; the oak-timber, exclusive of 2500 trees marked for the use of the navy, at 2100l.; the hornbeam and other wood, at 12,100l. (fn. 36) In the month of November 1652, it was resolved, that Enfield-chase should be sold for ready money (fn. 37), pursuant to which resolution it was divided into parcels, which were sold to various purchasers. A considerable part of it was inclosed, and several houses built. This excited great disturbances, and a body of men, claiming right of common, assembled in the month of July 1659, threatening to pull down the houses, and destroy the inclosures. Four files of soldiers having been sent against them, were so far from being able to suppress them, that the insur gents seized nine men and took them before a justice of peace, who committed them to Newgate (fn. 38). In consequence of these proceedings, two petitions were presented to the house, one from the officers of the army, and others who had purchased lands on the chase; the other from the inhabitants of Enfield, Edmonton, &c. who claimed right of common there. Both petitions were referred to a committee, whose resolutions were ordered to be read in the parish-church of Enfield the next Lord's-day (fn. 39). On the 18th of July the soldiers were ordered to remain prisoners in the custody of the marshal of the army, and the riots being likely to continue, the sheriffs of Middlesex were ordered to suppress them with the assistance of the military (fn. 40). The survey of the manor of Enfield, taken in 1686 (fn. 41), says, that on a former perambulation, the chase had been found to contain 7600 acres, of which 500 had been since inclosed in Theobald's-park. In the year 1777 an act of parliament passed for dividing Enfield-chase, and assigning allotments to such parishes and individuals as claimed a right of common (fn. 42). Upon this occasion, an accurate survey was made by Mr. Richardson, and it was found that, including the roads, lodges, and incroachments, the chase contained 8349A. 1 R. 30P. which were thus allotted:
The allotments to Hadley, South-Mims, (to which the manor of Oldfold belongs,) and Edmonton, are annexed by the act to those parishes, which leaves 5824 acres in the parish of Enfield, and makes the whole extent of the parish to be about 12,250 acres.
The first attempts to improve the chase, after it had been divided by act of parliament, as before mentioned, were in general unsuccessful; and it was not till within the last four or five years that any great progress was made in its cultivation. The obstacles, at first, were the difficulty of clearing away the wood, which at the time of the inclosure, bore (the oak excepted) a very low price; and the poverty of the soil, which was for the most part a thin gravel intermixed with clay. The methods made use of to enrich it, have been draining, paring and burning, and manuring with marle, which, within a few years, has been found in great abundance, and of a very fine quality, upon the chase. The use of this manure has been attended with surprising success (fn. 43).
The joint offices of ranger, forester, keeper of the lodges, master of the game, and chief steward of the manor, having been vested, successively, in the persons of John Dudley Earl of Warwick, Sir Thomas Wroth, John Astley, Esq. Robert Lord Cecil, William Earl of Salisbury, Charles Viscount Cranbourne, Charles Lord Gerrard of Brandon, George Villiers (the younger) Duke of Buckingham, the Right Hon. Henry Coventry, and Adam Loftus Vis count Lisburne, were granted, anno 1694, for fifty-six years, to Sir Robert Howard (fn. 44), who, the same year, assigned all his right in the grant to Sir William Scawen of Carshalton. In the year 1714 James Brydges, Esq. afterwards Duke of Chandos, purchased the above-mentioned offices for the unexpired term, and they are now, under a renewed grant, vested in the Chandos family.
When the chase was sold by parliament, during the interregnum, the sum of 1052l. 1s. 8d. was ordered to be paid to the Earl of Salisbury, who then held the offices above mentioned, for his interest therein, and in the custody of the parks (fn. 45).
Upon the chase are three lodges, distinguished by the names of the East-bailey, the West-bailey, and the South-bailey. In the furvey of 1650, the two former are called Potter's and Dighton's lodges, from the names of the under-keepers by whom they had been inhabited in 1635; the other was called Norris-lodge, I suppose from a similar reason. Potter's-lodge was a brick building covered with tiles, occasionally used by King Charles as a hunting-seat, as appears from the survey, which describes the King's lodging chamber. Norris-lodge was sold, soon after the survey was taken, to Arthur Evelyn; Dighton's-lodge to Charles Whitehead; and Potter's-lodge to John Nelthorpe. The Right Hon. Henry Coventry, who was secretary of state to Charles II. being in possession of the offices above-mentioned, kept the West-bailey lodge in his own hands; and having retired from public business in 1680, resided there several years (fn. 46). In 1676 he assigned the lease of the Southbailey lodge to Joshua Galliàrd, Esq. who made it over in 1697, to Sir Henry Bellasys. In 1699 Sir Henry procured a long lease from the crown, which was assigned to Charles Firebrace, Esq. anno 1702 (fn. 47). The lease of the East-bailey lodge was assigned by Mr. Coventry to Sir James Parsons; by him to James Whitchurch; and by the latter, anno 1685, to Henry Cornwall, Esq. Mr. Cornwall, in 1693, made it over to Christopher Lister, Esq. who the next year procured a long lease from the crown (fn. 48). All these leases afterwards came into the possession of the Chandos family, to whom they still belong; and the lodges have been let by them to under-tenants. The Southbailey lodge was for some years the occasional residence of the Right Hon. William Pitt, (afterwards Earl of Chatham,) by whom the pleasure-grounds were laid out at a considerable expence. It was afterwards for several years in the tenure of Fane William Sharpe, Esq. and is now occupied by Thomas Skinner, Esq. Alderman of London. The East-bailey, with an adjoining house called the White-lodge, or New East-bailey, was for some time in the occupation of Alexander Wedderburne, Esq. now Lord Loughborough and Lord High Chancellor; both these and the West-bailey lodge are at present unoccupied. In the survey of 1686, the inclosure annexed to the East-bailey lodge is stated at thirty-eight acres; that belonging to the South-lodge at sixty-five; and that belonging to the Westlodge at eighty-eight. Upon the division of the chase in 1777, three hundred and thirteen acres were allotted to the lodges collectively.
Sir Richard Jebb, the late celebrated physician, having procured a lease from the crown of a piece of land, containing about two hundred acres, on Enfield-chase, surrounded it with a pale, stocked it with deer, and built a villa after the Italian model, which he called Trent-place. After Sir Richard Jebb's death the lease of these premises was sold to Lord Cholmondeley, and is now the property of John Wigston, Esq. Camlet-moat, before-mentioned, is within these premises.
The Old-park (fn. 49), in the early surveys of the manor, is sometimes called the Fritb, and sometimes parcus intrinsecus, or the home-park, to distinguish it from the chase, which was called parcus extrinsecus, and sometimes the great-park. The Old-park, in the survey of 1650, is said to contain five hundred and fifty-three acres, valued at 311l. 10s. per annum; a hundred acres of the best land being valued at seventeen shillings per acre. Seventy-four acres of this park lay within the parish of Edmonton. The lodge occupied by Mr. Crosby, was valued at 81. per annum; the oaks at 1246l.; the hornbeam and other trees at 508l. 19s. 6d.; three hundred and ninety-seven trees were marked for the navy. The park was tithefree. The Earl of Salisbury was master of the game. This park, with the hop-garden, was granted to George Duke of Albemarle in 1660 (fn. 50). After the death of Christopher, the second Duke, it escheated to the crown, and was granted by King William in the first year of his reign, (having been before that time disparked, and con verted into meadow and tillage (fn. 51),) to the Earl of Portland (fn. 52). It is now the property of Samuel Clayton, Esq.
John de Enefelde, in the year 1350, died seised of a manor in this parish (fn. 53). His widow, Margaret, married John Wroth, to whom, anno 1374, Francis de Enefelde, son and heir of John, fold the manor (fn. 54). John Wroth's great-grandson of the same name, and son of Sir John Wroth, died anno 1412, seised of this manor, then called Wroth's-place (fn. 55). His widow, who afterwards married Sir Hugh Halsham, held a third of it in dower at the time of her death, which happened anno 1423 (fn. 56). John Wroth left issue a son, who died in his infancy; and one daughter, Elizabeth, who married Sir William Palton, and died anno 1413, without issue (fn. 57); when two-thirds of the manor were inherited by her cousin, Sir John Tiptost, being the son of her great-aunt Agnes, by Sir Pain Tiptost. John Tiptost, who became Lord of Powys in right of his wife, died anno 1443. (fn. 58) His son, the learned Earl of Worcester (fn. 59), became lord high-treasurer of England, and lost his head upon the scaffold, anno 1471, for his adherence to the house of York (fn. 60). Edward, his son, who was restored in blood, dying without issue, anno 1485, this manor became the property of Thomas Lord Roos of Hamlake, who married his aunt Philippa (fn. 61). Upon the death of Edmund Lord Roos without issue, anno 1508, the manor of Worcesters came to Sir Thomas Lovell, who married Isabel, his sister and coheir (fn. 62). Sir Thomas Lovell, who was knight of the garter, and treasurer of the household, lived many years at Enfield. In the year 1516 he was honoured with a visit by Margaret Queen Dowager of Scots, (sister of Henry VIII.) as we find by the following passage in a letter from Thomas Allen to the Earl of Shrewsbury: " On Ascension-day the Queen of "Scots came to Enfyld to Maister Treasurer's, and there tarryd "Thursday, Friday; and upon Saturday the Kyng's Grace met with "her, besids Totnam, at Maister Compton's house (fn. 63)." Sir Thomas Lovell died at his house at Enfield May 25, 1524, and was buried in the priory of Holywell, within a chapel which he himself had founded (fn. 64). Upon his death the manor of Worcesters descended to Thomas Earl of Rutland, grandson of Eleanor, another of the coheirs of Lord Roos above-mentioned (fn. 65). In the year 1540 it was given by the Earl of Rutland (together with a capital mansion called Elsynge-hall) to Henry VIII. (fn. 66) This manor, together with that of Enfield, was settled upon the Princess Elizabeth for life, by Edward VI. (fn. 67) It was granted, either by Elizabeth or James, to Sir Robert Cecil, the first Earl of Salisbury, who died seised of it anno 1612 (fn. 68). I have not been able to find at what time it was aliened by the Cecils; but it is certain, that in 1635 it was the property of Sir Nicholas Raynton, Knight (fn. 69), whose grandson Nicholas dying without male issue, it descended to his daughter and sole heir Mary, wife of John Wolstonholme, Esq. afterwards Sir John Wolstonholme, Bart. His sons, Nicholas and William, successively inherited his title and estates, and both died without male issue. Elizabeth, daughter of Sir William Wolstonholme, Bart. married Eliab Breton, Esq. who, in her right, became possessed of the manor of Worcesters, and other large estates in this parish, which were all sold after his death, which happened in 1785. The manor of Worcesters (for which a courtbaron is held) was purchased by Edmund Armstrong, Esq. who is the present proprietor.
In the Earl of Rutland's grant to Henry VIII. no manor-house is mentioned; but the manor of Worcesters is granted, with the capital mansion of Elsynge-hall, which took its name from one of the family of Elsynge who had a manor adjoining to that of Worcesters. It is probable, that the house was built originally by the Elsynges, purchased either by the Wroths or Tiptofts, and rebuilt by the Earl of Worcester. The New-park, alias the Little-park, which adjoined to this house, must have been taken out of the chase, and inclosed subsequent to the Earl of Rutland's grant to Henry VIII. (fn. 70) When the manor of Worcesters was granted to the Cecil family, the mansion of Elsynge-hall was reserved, and the custody, both of that house and the adjoining park, by the name of the manor of Elsinge (fn. 71), was granted, in the year 1624, to Philip Earl of Montgomery (fn. 72). King Charles, in the year 1641, sold these premises by the name of Enfield-house (fn. 73), with an inclosure called the Warren, and the Newpark, or Little-park, adjoining, (parcel of the duchy of Lancaster,) to the same Earl, (then Earl of Pembroke) for the sum of 53001. (fn. 74) The park, which was described as containing three hundred and seventy-five acres, entitled the owner to the right of free-warren, and all royalties, &c. within its bounds. It was granted subject to a seefarm rent of 5l. per annum. The Enfield-house, thus conveyed by King Charles to the Earl of Pembroke, is that which Camden and Norden speak of as being Queen Elizabeth's, and as having been built by an Earl of Worcester (fn. 75). In Norden's map it is described with a park-pale, not far from White Webbs, and at a considerable distance from the town of Enfield (fn. 76), where he places another inclosure for the Old-park, which adjoined to the manor-house. Enfieldhouse, or Elsynge-hall, has been long since pulled down; its site is not now known; but it seems probable, that it stood at the distance of about a quarter of a mile from Mr. Armstrong's house at Fortyhill, near the stream of water which runs to Enfield-wash. At this place are remains of fish-ponds; and the inequalities of the ground show that it has been the site of buildings. Tradition says, that Queen Mary had a palace there. The New, or Little-park, has been so long converted into meadow and tillage, and divided into small parcels, that all remembrance of it is lost, and I have not been able exactly to ascertain its site (fn. 77).
Sir Nicholas Raynton (about the same time, it is probable, that he purchased the manor of Worcesters) became possessed of a copyholdhouse, described as some time Hugh Fortee's, and late Sir Thomas Gourney's (fn. 78). This house (which has been since enfranchised) he rebuilt between the years 1629 and 1632. Inigo Jones is said to have been the architect. It is still standing, goes by the name of Fortyhall, and, since its union with the manor of Worcesters, has been considered as the manor-house. It was repaired and modernised by the Wolstonholmes in the year 1700. Over the chimney-piece in one of the rooms, is a fine picture of Sir Nicholas Raynton, in his lord mayor's robes. It is dated 1643, is much in Vandyke's manner, and was painted, probably, by his pupil Dobson (fn. 79). Forty-hall stands on high ground (fn. 80), and commands a pleasant prospect towards Waltham-abbey, and that part of Essex.
The manor of Durance (or, more properly, Durants) and Gartons, sometimes called also the manor of Stonehouse (fn. 81), belonged in the reign of Edward I. to Richard de Plessitis, who held lands, valued at 161. 16s. 0½d. of the Earl of Hereford, and other lands, valued at 4l. 5s. 11d. per annum, under the abbey of Walden; dying without issue, anno 1290, his estate was divided between his three sisters, Sabina wife of Nicholas Peche, Aveline wife of Richard Durant, and Emma wife of John Heyron (fn. 82). It is probable that Sabina died without issue, as the manor does not appear to have been divided into more than two parts, one of which descended to John Heyron, (son of John above-mentioned,) who died anno 1336, leaving his sister Margaret, aged forty, and John Garton, (his nephew, I suppose, by another sister,) aged twenty-fix, his heirs (fn. 83). The other moiety was inherited by Thomas Durant, (grandson of Aveline (fn. 84),) who dying anno 1350, left issue an only daughter Maud (fn. 85), then a minor, afterwards married to John Wroth (fn. 86), and secondly to Sir Baldwin de Radyngton, who died anno 1403, seised of the manor of Durantys for life, with remainder to his wife's son William Wroth (fn. 87). The manor of Durants, to which that of Gartons was, at an early period, annexed (fn. 88), continued in the Wroth family for many generations (fn. 89). John Wroth, Esq. who died anno 1519, had three sons, among whom the manor of Durants, &c. seems to have been equally divided (fn. 90). Thomas Ashby, Esq. died anno 1559, seised of an estate in Enfield, (being a third of the manor of Durants,) in right of his wife Anne, daughter and sole heir of Edward, eldest son of John Wroth above-mentioned (fn. 91). This third part, which descended to Sir Robert Ashby (fn. 92), was, anno 1635, the property of William Bowyer, Esq. and anno 1686, of Joseph Dawson and others. The two other shares became again united (fn. 93), and continued in the Wroth family till the year 1673, when the manor (fn. 94) of Durants and Gartons was sold by William Lord Maynard and William Maynard, Esq. executors of Sir Henry Wroth, who died in 1671, to Sir Thomas Stringer, Knt. for the sum of 8900l. (fn. 95) William Stringer, Esq. son of Sir Thomas, died in 1723, having bequeathed this estate, which he inherited from his father, to his wife Margaret, daughter of Lord Chancellor Jeffreys. She died in 1727, having settled the reversion of this manor upon Richard Darby, Esq. who, anno 1735, bequeathed it to his wife, afterwards married to William Underwood, Esq. (fn. 96) Mr. Underwood, anno 1744, sold the manor to Samuel Child, Esq. from whom it descended to his eldest son Francis; and upon his death, without issue, to the late Robert Child, Esq. of Osterley. Mr. Child, anno 1774, conveyed the manor to Robert Dent, and the latter, the same year, to John Dawes, Esq. It was aliened by Mr. Dawes to Sands Chapman, Esq. anno 1787; and by the latter, anno 1793, to Newell Connop, Esq. the present proprietor.
The manor of Durants was valued at ten marks anno 1403 (fn. 97). The manor of Gartons, anno 1336 (fn. 98), consisted of an hundred and ten acres of arable, valued at four-pence an acre; twelve of meadow; and fourteen of pasture. By the inquisition taken after the death of John Wroth, Esq. anno 1519, it appears, that he was seised of the manor of Durants, and twenty houses, twenty tofts, two mills, ten gardens, three hundred acres of arable, two hundred of meadow, forty of pasture, and ten of wood (fn. 99).
Jordan de Elfynge, in the reign of Edward III. held a fifth part of a knight's-fee, (which had formerly belonged to John de Rana,) and another fifth part, (formerly Thomas Fescampe's,) of the Earl of Hereford (fn. 100). These lands, anno 1455, were the property of John Norrys (fn. 101); and in the year 1526, belonged to John Wilford, Esq. (fn. 102) Stephen Wilford died seised of them in the year 1547. They were then described as the manor of Elsynge, alias Norris-farm, two-thirds of which lay in the parish of Enfield, and were held of the King in capite; the remainder was in the parish, and held of the manor of Hadley (fn. 103). This part, which must have been very far detached from the rest of the estate, was aliened from the Wilfords at an early period, and was, anno 1635, the property of Henry Hunsdon (fn. 104). The two other severalties, which appear to be situated near Ponder'send, and the marshes, were the property of the Wilford family, anno 1686. Freehold lands were aliened, anno 1708, by Richard Wilford to John Cotton. I have not been able to learn any thing farther relating to this estate, except that a farm-house, called Norris-farm, being a moated site, and most probably the ancient manor-house, is rated in the parish books as the property of Messrs. Pinnock and Handley.
Joan, relict of Sir William Parr, comptroller of the household, and wife of Thomas Colt, died anno 1476, seised of a manor in Enfield, called Suffolks, held under the Queen. It was inherited by her son, John Colt (fn. 105) John Wroth died seised of this manor anno 1644 (fn. 106). In 1686 it was the property of Joshua Galliard (fn. 107), Esq. from whom it descended to the late Pierce Galliard, Esq. and was lately (anno 1792) sold by Charles Bowles, Esq. of East-Sheen, who married his daughter, to Newell Connop, Esq. the present proprietor. It is situated near Ponder's-end.
The joint manors of Honylands and Pentriches, (called also the manor of Capels,) partly in this parish, and partly in that of Cheshunt, were parcel of the possessions of Sir Giles Capel, who granted them to the crown in exchange for other lands, anno 1547 (fn. 108). They were sold by Queen Elizabeth, anno 1562, for thirty years purchase, to William Horne, merchant, being then valued at 31l. 7s. per annum, with the profits of court and rents of assize (fn. 109). Horne sold them the same year to John Tamworth, Esq. one of her Majesty's privy-council (fn. 110), who died in 1569 (fn. 111). In the year 1575 they were aliened by Thomas Sydney to Sir Thomas Knolles (fn. 112). In 1627 they belonged to William Pennyfather, Esq. (fn. 113) who aliened them to William Avery, anno 1638 (fn. 114). They continued in that family till the year 1724, when they were sold to Charles Eyre, Esq. from whom they were inherited by Robert Jacomb, Esq. The latter sold them, anno 1783, to William Hart, Esq.; and they were again sold, anno 1793, to the present proprietor Rawson Hart Boddam, Esq. late governor of Bombay. A court-baron, court-leet, and view of frankpledge, are held, jointly, for these manors, which lie near Bull'scross, where Mr. Boddam has a handsome villa, not far from the manor-house of Capels, which is about to be pulled down.
When Mr. Breton's estates were sold in 1786, a lot, called in the particulars of sale Bull's-cross farm, with the site of the manor of Goldbeaters, was purchased by Joseph Mellish, Esq. Of this manor I have seen no other mention. Lands called Goldbeaters, which paid a quit-rent of 7s. 7d. to the Queen, are described in an abstract of a survey of Enfield taken in 1572. They were then the property of Robert Huicke, Esq. physician in ordinary, to whom, in the year 1570, her Majesty granted a mansion called White-Webbs-house, with a conduit head, vaults, pipes, &c. (fn. 115) This house was, in 1653, the property of Dr. Bockenham; and came, by several mesne conveyances, to the Garnault family. It has been lately pulled down. A tradition, which perhaps is not much to be depended on, says, that White-Webbs-house was hired by the conspirators of the powderplot, for the purpose of watching for the signal of their success.
The Abbot of Thorney had lands in this parish, valued, in the reign of Henry VI. at seven marks per annum (fn. 116). These lands, by the name of Cranes, came to the Wroths; and were, in 1686, the property of Sir Thomas Stringer (fn. 117). They are now held, with the manor of Durants, by Newell Connop, Esq.
At Ponder's-end is an ancient mansion, called Lincoln-house, which appears to have taken its name from the Fiennes's, Earls of Lincoln, of whom Henry and Thomas, the second and third Earls, resided there from 1600 till 1612. If we may judge from the arms, which are still to be seen in the windows (fn. 118), it was before that time the resi dence, or property of Henry Howard Viscount Bindon, and afterwards of Sir Thomas Coventry, lord-keeper, and of George Villiers, the first Duke of Buckingham; it is now a school.
Rowland Watson, clerk of the crown, had a house at White Webbs in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, and lands, valued at 60l. per annum. (fn. 119). Sir Samuel Starling, in the beginning of the last century, had a capital messuage at Forty-hill, called Garret's-place, which came afterwards to the Wilfords (fn. 120). Sir Robert Jason, anno 1686, had a mansion at Enfield-green.
The stream which forms Enfield-wash, and falls into the Lea, takes its rise on the Chase. The New River takes a very circuitous course through this parish, from the extremity towards Cheshunt to the boundaries of Edmonton. Sir Thomas Wroth, anno 1572, farmed a water-course, called the Mill-river, which was connected with the Lea, and was wider than that river (fn. 121). Sir Thomas Wroth had two mills upon this water. In 1635, John Wroth, Esq. held the Millriver, under a see-farm rent of 6l. per annum (fn. 122). In 1686 it was held on the same tenure by the Hon. George Howard, in right of his wife Ann, widow of James Cooper, and daughter of John Wroth, Esq. (fn. 123)
The parish church consists of a nave, chancel, and two aisles, separated by clustered columns and pointed arches. The windows are of the architecture which prevailed during the fourteenth, and till the middle of the fifteenth century. The device of a rose and wing, which occurs over the arches of the nave, which device is to be seen also upon the tower of Hadley-church, with the date 1444, supposing it to have been, as is very probable, a punning cognizance adopted by one of the priors of Walden, to which monastery both churches belonged, will fix the building of the present structure at Enfield to the early part of the fifteenth century. At the west end of the church is a square embattled tower.
On the south wall of the chancel are the monuments of Francis Evington, alderman of London (fn. 124) (1614), and John Watt, merchant (1701). On the north side those of Joseph Gascoigne, S. T. P. forty years vicar (1721); and Martha, wife of James Palmer, Esq. (daughter of William Garrard of Dorney, Bucks (fn. 125) (1617). On the floor are the tombs of Ann, daughter of Richard Gery, Esq. of Bushmead in the county of Bedford (fn. 126) (1643); William Sheffard, professor of physic, in London (1646); Sir Charles Rich, Bart. fourth son of Sir Edward Rich, Knight Banneret, nephew of Robert Lord Rich (1677); Edward Shaller, Gent. (1708); Richard Fountaine, Esq. (1721); and Daniel Brattell, Esq. (1741).
In the windows, over the arches of the nave, are the arms of King Henry VIII. impaling Arragon, and those of Lovell and Muswell quarterly, quartering Paston (fn. 127). On the floor are the tombs of Joseph Ducasse, Esq. (1737); Daniel Parker, Esq. (1738); Mr. John Crevillier (1755); Israel Jalabert, Esq. (1768); and Miss Sarah Wyburd (1775).
In the east window of the north aisle are two escutcheons, with the arms and quarterings of Thomas Earl of Rutland (fn. 128), dated 1530; one of them is surrounded with the garter. Against the north wall, at the east end, (within a small space, now inclosed, and forming a vestry,) is a handsome monument, supported by columns of the Corinthian order, to the memory of Sir Nicholas Raynton, Knight (fn. 129), some time lord mayor of London. It is ornamented with wholelength figures of Sir Nicholas and his lady. He is represented in armour; over which is the lord mayor's robe and chain. She is habited as lady mayoress. There are figures also of their son Nicholas, and his wife, with some children in kneeling attitudes. Sir Nicholas died in 1646; his son in 1641. Opposite to this monument, between the north aisle and the chancel, stands a large table tomb, erected to the memory of Joyce Lady Tiptost, mother of the learned Earl of Worcester. The sides are ornamented with plain shields, tresoils, and quatresoils. On the slab which covers the tomb, is a figure in brass of the deceased, habited in a surcoat faced with ermine, over which is a mantle embroidered with the arms of Charlton (Lord Powis) and Holland. Her head-dress is a net-work cap and a short veil, over which is the coronet. The figure stands under a rich Gothic canopy, on the pillars of which are the arms of Tiptost and Charlton. The whole is surrounded with a border, on which is the following inscription: " . . . . . . . . . . . .a Jocosa quondam silia et hered. Caroli (fn. 130) Dni Powes ac eciam silia et una hered. honorabilissime Dne Marchie (fn. 131) et uxor samosissimo militi, (Johanni Tiptost que obiit XX (fn. 132) ) II die Septebr. a Dni M,CCCC,XLVI cujus anime et omniu sideliu desunctor. I hs pro suâ sacratissimâ passione misereat." At the four corners of the border are the symbols of the Evangelists; and between each word, representations of birds, sishes, and various other devices. Over this tomb is raised an open obtuse arch, with Gothic ornaments, and a border of soliage, to the memory of Edmund Lord Roos, who died in the year 1508, and was buried at Enfield. The pillars of this arch conceal part of the inscription on Lady Tiptost's tomb. Lord Roos's monument has no inscription. Over the centre of the arch, and on the sinister spandril, are his arms and quarterings (fn. 133); and on the other spandril, those of Sir Thomas Lovell (fn. 134), who married his sister, and, it is probable, erected the monument.
On the wall of the north aisle are the monuments of Robert Delcrowe (fn. 135), citizen of London (1580); Elizabeth, wife of John Green (fn. 136), (daughter of Sir William Middelton, and grand-daughter of Sir Hugh)—(1673); and Stephen Riou (fn. 137), merchant (1740). On the floor are the tombs of Lieutenant General Richard Francks, (who came over with William III.) (1745); Michael Garnault, Esq. (1746); Aime Garnault, Esq. (1782); and Thomas Mills, Esq. (1768).
At the east end of the south aisle, on the north wall, is the monument of Thomas Stringer, Esq. (fn. 138) a half-length bust of whom (of white marble, and in armour,) stands under the canopy of a tent. He was son of Sir Thomas Stringer of Durants, a colonel in the army, and M. P. He died at Bruges, anno 1706. The monument was erected by Katherine, wife of Thomas Earl of Westmorland. In the same aisle, against the north wall, are tablets to the memory of the families of Benjamin and Thomas Boddington, Esqrs. and the monuments of Dorothy, wife of Robert Middlemore, Esq. (fn. 139) (1610); and Mr. Henry Dixon, who died anno 1696, aged ninety-one. On the floor are the tombs of William Smith, and Jane his wife (with brass plates). He served Henry VIII. Edward VI. Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth, and died anno 1592; Richard Middlemore, Esq. (1744); John Burges, Esq. (1767); Ann, widow of John Adolphus Schroder, Esq. (1788); Mrs. Catherine Hotchkis (1789); and Mrs. Ann Hotchkis (1790).
In the church-yard are the tombs of John Aston, merchant (1739); John White, surveyor to the New River Company (fn. 140) (1741); William Barwell, merchant (1743); Theodore Hay, Gent. (1743); David Lewis, Gent. of Penvolecary, in the county of Carmarthen (1746); Thomas Horne, Esq. (1747); Mr. Edward Paulin (1747); John Hamilton, Esq. of Bull's-cross (1747); Joseph Dobbins, Esq. of Clay-hill (1753); Edward Bowles, Gent. (1753); Anthony Clerembault, merchant (1758); Elizabeth, wife of John Hiens, and daughter of Thomas Jenkinson, Esq. (1765); Mrs. Elizabeth Appleford (1765); William Morris, Esq. captain in the 48th regiment of foot (1769); Joseph Hurlock, surgeon (1769); Elizabeth, wife of John Powell, Esq. and relict of John Aston (1771); Samuel White, Esq. (1771); Thomas Brown, Gent. of Gray's-inn (1772); George Riddell, A. B. of Trinity-college, Cambridge (1774); Thomas Redhead, Esq. (1775); Thomas Price, Esq. (1776); Mary, wife of Robert Jacomb, Esq. (1776); Rev. William Bush, minister of the Presbyterian congregation for the space of fifty years (1777); John Saville, Esq. of Clay-hill (1778); Mary, wife of Charles Staples, merchant (1779); Ralph Cooper, apothecary (1781); John Loving, Esq. captain in the navy (1782); Captain Samuel Barnes (1784); George Powell, Esq. (1785); Robert Thorne, Esq. (1785); Hugh James, Esq. of Enfield-chase (1786); Rev. Andrew Kinross (1786); Robert Barnevelt, citizen of London (1786); Mr. Nicholas Gautier (1788); Mr. John Rainforth (1790); William Belshaw, Esq. aged ninety (1790); John Tilly, Esq. (1790); Capt. Robert Richmond (1791); and Richard Price, Esq. (1793).
Geoffrey de Mandeville, the first Earl of Essex, gave a rent of an hundred shillings per annum to the monks of Hurley in exchange for the tithes of Enfield and Edmonton, both which he granted to the abbey of Walden, which was founded by himself (fn. 141). The grant was confirmed by King Stephen, and by Henry II. (fn. 142). The monks of Hurley retained, nevertheless, the tithes of the Chase, which had been given them by William de Mandeville (fn. 143), and confirmed to them by William de S. Maria, Bishop of London, anno 1219. Godfrey, prior of Hurley, in the year 1258, exchanged those tithes with the abbot of Walden for the church of Stratley (fn. 144). In a survey of the churches belonging to the abbey of Walden, which must have been drawn up subsequent to this exchange, Enfield is said to have been appropriated to the use of the monks of that convent, with all the tithes, both of the demesne lands and others. The monks received half a mark out of the vicarage; three marks from a mill; twenty shillings from the tenants of the glebe; and kept fix acres of meadow in their own hands (fn. 145). After the dissolution of monasteries, this rectory was granted, anno 1540, to Thomas Lord Audley (fn. 146), who, four years afterwards, surrendered it again to the King (fn. 147). It was granted, anno 1548, to Trinity-college in Cambridge (fn. 148), to which society it still belongs. The rectory is a manor, holds a court-leet, and is entitled to all royalties within its own precincts. It was formerly called the manor of Surlowes (fn. 149), but now the rectory, or manor of the Parsonage-ward. In the year 1327 the rectory was rated at sixty marks (fn. 150). In 1650 the glebe, and great tithes, were valued at 260l. per annum, and were then on lease to Sir William Langlye, Knt. at the reserved rent of 181. 13s. 4d. besides a corn-rent of fourteen quarters of wheat, and eighteen quarters and a half, a bushel, and a peck of malt (fn. 151). The present lessee is the Right Hon. Wilmot Earl of Lisburne, who became possessed of the lease in right of his first wife, who was daughter, and eventually heir, of Joseph Gas coigne Nightingale, Esq. (fn. 152) The rectorial house is situated on the north side of Parsonage-lane, and has been let for some years past to under-tenants.
Godfrey de Beston, in the reign of Edward I. granted a house, (adjoining to the church-yard,) which he had purchased of Richard de Plessitis, to Bartholomew, vicar of Enfield, and his successors. The said Richard added to it a piece of ground for a garden, lying between the church-yard and the highway, called Ernygstrate (fn. 153). The present vicarage-house has the appearance of considerable antiquity, and seems to have been built about the time of Henry VIII. In 1327 the vicarage was rated at nine marks; in the King's books it is valued at 261. per annum (fn. 154). In the year 1650 the vicaragehouse, with a close, two acres of land in the common fields, and the small tithes, were valued at 581. per annum (fn. 155). When the division of Enfield chase took place as before mentioned, an allotment of five hundred and nineteen acres and thirty-two perches was appropriated to the tithe-owners, in lieu of the tithes of the King's allotment; those of the parish of South-mims; the proprietors of the Old-park and the manor of Oldfold, and the inclosures belonging to the parish of Enfield. The remainder of the Enfield allotment, with those belonging to Edmonton and Hadley, were left subject to tithes, with a power nevertheless reserved to the parishes, of compounding for them at any future time. Out of the above-mentioned allotment, in lieu of tithes, ninety acres were appropriated to the vicar for his share. The vicarage of Enfield having been always annexed to a fellowship of Trinity-college, power is given by the act to augment it by a farther endowment of one hundred and sixty acres, parcel of the tithe allotment over and above the ninety acres already mentioned, as the vicar's share, an agreement being previously made with the lessee of the rectory for that purpose. Whenever this augmentation shall have taken place, the acceptance of the vicarage of Enfield by one of the fellows of Trinity-college will vacate his fellowship. The vicar of Enfield has a power under the act of making leases not to exceed twenty-one years.
Walter Bridges, "an able and painful preacher," is mentioned as vicar of Enfield in the survey of that benefice anno 1650 (fn. 156). To him succeeded Daniel Manning, who was deprived at the restoration (fn. 157). The present vicar is the Rev. Richard Newbon, B. D. who was instituted in 1767.
Henry Loft of Enfield, in the year 1631, founded a lectureship in this parish, and endowed it with 4l. per annum. The present lecturer is the Rev. John Milne, who succeeded the late Samuel Hardy, M. A. (fn. 158) in 1793.
Baldwin de Radyngton, in the year 1398, obtained the King's licence (fn. 159) to found a chantry in the parish-church of Enfield, and to endow it with lands of the value of 10l. per annum. A part of this endowment consisted of Radington-bridge and lands adjoining in Enfield (fn. 160). Edward Causton, vicar of Enfield, and others, had a licence from Edward IV. to found a chantry at the altar of St. Mary, for the souls of Robert Blossom and Agnes his wife, to be called Blossom's-chantry, and to be endowed with ten marks per annum (fn. 161). Robert Blossom died anno 1418, and left an estate in Essex (situated in South-Benslete and some adjoining parishes) to his wife Agnes, who afterwards purchased a manor called Poynants, (or Poynetts,) in Benslete (fn. 162). The endowment of Blossom's-chantry was either a part of or a rent-charge upon these lands, which, on the dissolution of monasteries and chantries, became vested in the crown; and having been granted by James I. to Edmund Dussield and John Babbington (fn. 163), was, after some mesne assignments, sold by Thomas Kennithorp to Sir Nicholas Salter, Nicholas Raynton, and Benjamin Decrowe, who conveyed it to the seossees of the grammar-school at Enfield, which had been endowed before with the manor of Poynants (fn. 164). It appears by the chantry-roll in the Augmentation-office, that John Ford gave a close and three acres of land at Enfield for the maintenance of a brotherhood priest; and that Maud Hamond gave to the same priest, and for her obit, a tenement, valued at eight shillings per ann. Walter Ford, Hugh Ford, —Rotheram, and Thomas Aylworth, gave lands and tenements for obits; and Walter Baldwin three acres and an half of land for a light before the Virgin Mary. John de Banbury, anno 1339, gave some lands at Enfield for a chantry in Bishopsgate-hospital (fn. 165). Chantry-lands at Enfield were sold, after the reformation, to John Hulson and Bartholomew Broxey; the lands and tenements for obits to John Hulson and William Pendrede (fn. 166).
There was a congregation of Presbyterian dissenters at this place as early as the year 1686 (fn. 167), which still continues; the meeting-house is in Baker-street. Edmund Calamy, a celebrated divine of that persuasion, died at his house here in November 1666 (fn. 168).
There are also at Enfield two meeting-houses belonging to the Methodists, nearly adjoining to each other, on the chase-side; one of which was built in the year 1784; the other some years afterwards, in consequence of a schism among the brethren. In the town is a meeting-house belonging to the Quakers, and at Ponder'send one belonging to the Anabaptists.
I had formed hopes of being able to deduce some satisfactory conclusions, relating to the comparative state of population in the several parishes of Middlesex, about the middle of the sixteenth century, from the chantry-roll of that county at the Augmentation-office, in which is specified the number of bouselyng people or communicants in each parish at the time of the reformation. The event of comparing the two parishes of Edmonton and Enfield shows, however, that nothing satisfactory can be concluded from it. In Edmonton there were, as it appears, six hundred communicants; in Enfield, which (as the registers of both parishes, during the sixteenth century, are extant) we know to have been, at that time, almost twice as populous, there were only one hundred.
The increase of population in this parish has been considerable though gradual. The survey of the manor, anno 1635, says, that forty-three new cottages had been erected on the waste within the twenty years then preceding; between 1635 and 1686, sixtyone cottages were built (fn. 169). The present number of houses is about nine hundred and twenty (fn. 170). Nursed children and strangers contribute much to swell the list of burials at this place.
In 1603, two hundred and fifty-three persons were interred, one hundred and twenty-nine of whom were said to die of the plague: in 1625, two hundred and two, of whom sixty-seven are marked plague. In 1665, the number of burials was one hundred and seventy-six. Those who were reported by the searchers to have died of the sickness, were buried some in the church-yard, and some in other places within the parish.
"John Wroth and Mistress Elizabeth Hayles married Feb. 2, 1550–1. Mr. Thomas Shyrley and Mrs. Anna Wroth nup. Dec. 12, 1575. John Wroth, fil. Roberti Wroth, baptiz. June 11, 1577. Sr Robert Wroth buried Jan. 28, 1605–6.—Sr Robert Wroth his funeral Mar. 3." He was son of Sir Thomas Wroth, who fled into Germany during the reign of Queen Mary. Fuller remarks, that it was observable, that the family of this man, who thus went away for his conscience, was the only one, out of all those mentioned by Norden, which were not extinct in his time (anno 1660) (fn. 171). Sir Thomas Wroth (fn. 172) married Mary, daughter of Richard Lord Rich. "Mar. 15, 1613–4, Sir Robert Wroth buried." Son of the last Sir Robert, by Susan Stonard. He married Mary, daughter of Robert Earl of Leicester, and niece of Sir Philip Sidney, a lady of a literary turn, and author of a romance called the Countess of Montgomery's Urania (fn. 173). James, son of Sir Robert Wroth, was buried July 16, 1616; Thomas, Jan. 23, 1616–7; Robert, son of Henry Wroth, Esq. Jan. 16, 1614–15. "The wife of Henry Wroth, Esq. was here interred in the vault belonging to that noble family, Dec. 19, 1653." Several children of Sir Henry Wroth, and Anne his wife, were baptized as follows: Anne, Jan. 4, 1654–5; Jane, March 29, 1659; (she married William Henry, the first Earl of Rochford;) Robert, Aug. 27, 1660; another, Anne, Nov. 30, 1662; Elizabeth, Dec. 31, 1665. The Lady Anne, wife of Sir Henry Wroth, was buried Nov. 9, 1667; Sir Henry, Sept. 26, 1671. Sir Henry Wroth's name is to be found in the list of persons who were to have been made Knights of the Royal Oak after the restoration. His estates, which lay principally in Hertfordshire, were valued at 2000l. per annum (fn. 174). Henry Wroth, Esq. (from London,) son of Sir Henry, was buried in the Durants vault, (then Sir Thomas Stringer's,) June 10, 1679. "John, son of John Wroth, and Elizabeth his wife, (daughter of William Lord Maynard (fn. 175),) baptized Aug. 19, 1667." Anne, daughter of this John Wroth, married, to her second husband, George Howard, afterwards Earl of Suffolk, and was buried at Enfield July 28, 1710, being the last of the family there interred (fn. 176).
"July 30, 1606. Mary Gray, silia Domini Johannis Gray Militis sepult." Sir John Gray was eldest son of Henry, Baron Gray of Groby. He died before his father, leaving issue two sons. I find, that Ambrose Gray, son of the said Lord Gray, and only brother of Sir John, died at Enfield anno 1636, and was there interred (fn. 177). His burial is not inserted in the register.
"Da Maria, silia Philipti Herbert Comitis de Monte Gomara, sepulta 12 die Julii 1616. James Herbert, filius Philipti Herbert Earle of Mount Gomora, sepult. 29 Aug. 1617. My Lord of Mountgomerye's younge sonne was buryed the fifte of April 1618. Charles Harbert, filius Philippi Earle of Mountgomery, baptizatus erat. Sept. 19, 1619." At the age of fifteen, being then Lord Herbert, he married Mary, daughter of George Duke of Buckingham, and died during the life-time of his father, anno 1636. Philip Harbert, filius M. William Harbert, sepultus Nov. 25, 1620. Philip Harbert, filius Philippi Earle of Mountgomery, baptized Feb. 21, 1620-1." He succeeded his father as Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, anno 1650, and died anno 1669. "William Hertberd, filius de Philippi Herbert Earle of Mountgomery, baptizatus erat. May 28, 1622." He died unmarried. "James Harbert, filius to the Right Honorable Philip Earle of Mountgomery, baptized Nov. 12, 1623." Ancestor to the Herberts of Oxfordshire. "Mr. John Harberd, filius Philippi Harbert Earle of Mountgomery, baptized May 2, 1625." Philip Earl of Montgomery, (afterwards of Pembroke,) father of the children whose baptisms are here registered, lived many years at Elsynge-hall, or Enfield-house, of which he was appointed keeper by King James. He afterwards purchased it of the crown. This Earl was a man of considerable note, and for some time Chancellor of the University of Oxford. During the civil war he attached himself to the parliamentary party, and so far yielded to the spirit of the times, as to accept of a seat in the House of Commons after Cromwell had put down the lords. The following account of his admission into the lower house, April 13, 1649, is taken from a newspaper of that date. "This day the Earl of Pembroke was admitted into the house according to his election. Many members of the house came out, and did attend his honour into the house with much respect (fn. 178)."
"The truelie worthy John Bernard of Huntingdon, within the county of Huntingdon, Esq. single man, and Mrs. Elizabeth St. John, daughter to the Right Honble Oliver St. John, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas (fn. 179), were married before her said father, and by him declared man and wife, Feb. 26, 1655–6,coram testibus non paucis, venerabilibus et fide dignis."
"Dorothy, daughter of Mr. George Wharton, baptized July 7, 1668." George Wharton, the celebrated astrologer, resided many years at Enfield. During the civil war he attached himself to the King, entered into the army, and acquitted himself with great bravery. Charles II. created him a baronet anno 1677. He died in the month of August 1681, at his house in Enfield, and was removed to St. Peter's chapel in the Tower. Besides his astrological works, which are very numerous, he published some select poems, and was editor of the Mercurius Elenchicus. Wood calls him "a constant and thorough-paced royalist, a good companion, a witty droll, and a waggish poet (fn. 180)."
"John Platt, Esq. of Westbrook-place near Godalming, married June 20, 1672, to Rebecca, daughter of Sir Thomas Stringer, Knt. Thomas, son of Sir John Platt, Knt. and the Lady Rebecca his wife, baptized Oct. 11, 1680." Sir John was great grandson of Sir Hugh Platt, author of the Garden of Eden, the Jewell-house of Art and Nature, and other works. His father was a nonconformist divine, and rector of West Horsley in Surrey. His mother was daughter of Sir Humphry Lynde of Cobham, author of Via Tuta, and other tracts against the Papists. Sir John had several children, most of whom died in their infancy (fn. 181).
"Mr. John Stringer, the brother of Sir Thomas Stringer, was buried in the vault belonging to Durance, Jan. 17, 1676–7. Sir Thomas Stringer buried Oct. 9, 1689.". Sir Thomas Stringer was descended from the Stringers of Sharleston in Yorkshire; at an early age he was made steward of the ancient court of record in the Tower of London; he was appointed King's serjeant in 1679; and justice of the Common Pleas in October 1688, in the room of Sir Richard Allibon, a Roman Catholic. In the Michaelmas vacation following, the new justice continued to act in his judicial capacity, notwithstanding the King's departure beyond sea, in opposition to the opinion of several eminent lawyers; and was about to hold the essoigns for the Hilary term following, had he not been forbidden by the powers who assumed the government of the kingdom in his Majesty's absence (fn. 182). Sir Thomas Stringer married Anne, daughter of Sir John Melton, secretary to the council at York. The Lady Stringer, from London, was buried Feb. 28, 1714–15. William Stringer, Esq. Aug. 18, 1723. The Hon. Margaret Stringer, who was daughter of the famous Judge Jeffreys, May 11, 1727.
"Nicholas, son of John Wolstonholme, Esq. and Mrs. Mary, his "wife, baptized March 6, 1675–6." John Wolstonholme, who married Mary, daughter of Nicholas Raynton, Esq. was grandson of Sir John Wolstonholme, who was created a baronet in 1665. He died in the month of February, 1708–9, (being then Sir John Wolstonholme, Bart.) and was buried at Enfield on the 16th. Nicholas, his eldest son, whose baptism is here entered, succeeded him in the title, and dying without issue, was buried at Enfield Feb. 28, 1716–7. His widow, Grace, daughter of Sir Edward Waldo, Knt. married William Ferdinando Carey, Lord Hunsdon, who, for a few years, had Forty-hall in right of his wife. Lady Hunsdon died without issue anno 1729. Sir William Wolstonholme, Bart. who succeeded his brother Nicholas, was buried at Enfield Feb. 7, 1723–4; and Dame Elizabeth, his wife, May 18, 1739. Sir William leaving no male issue, the title went to another branch of the family.
"Be it remembered, that William Deanes, Robert and Margaret "Deanes, were all three brought down dead from London, and were buried all three in one ground, upon the 6th of May, 1677;–the first examples of the Coventry act." A pamphlet relating to this affair was published at the time, entitled, "Cruelty punished; or a full and perfect Relation of the unparalleled Inhumanity of William Deane, Robert Deane, and Margaret Deane, practised upon the Body of Jane King, a young beautiful Maiden living at Clayhill, at Enfield; together with their Trial at the Old Bayley on Thursday, April 26, 1677, and the Judges' Speeches, and their Charge given to the Jury. Also, an Account of their Speeches, and Carriage at Tybourn, at their Execution, Friday, May 4, 1677."
"The Lady Bridget Fielding, daughter to the Right Hon. Basil Earl of Desmond, and the Lady Hester his wife, was borne Sep. ye 14th, and baptized the 22, 1698." She married James Otway, Esq. Basil, son of the Earl of Denbigh and Desmond, was baptized Oct. 1, and buried Oct. 22, 1699. Elizabeth, his daughter, was baptized Aug. 25, 1700; she died unmarried. Basil Earl of Denbigh, married Hester, daughter of Sir Basil Firebrace, whose family seem to have had some connection with the manor and lodges at Enfield (fn. 183).
"The Right Honourable Viscount Kilmurry, buried April 20, 1717." Robert Viscount Killmorey, (son of Robert the seventh Viscount,) succeeded to the title anno 1710. He died in his minority, being a pupil of Dr. Uvedale at Enfield. John, his younger brother, is the present Viscount.
"John, son of Sr Henry Parker, Bart, and Dame Catherine his wife, baptized July 8, 1744." Only son of Sir Henry. He died in his father's lifetime, anno 1769. The present Baronet is son of Sir Hyde, and nephew of Sir Henry here mentioned.
"The Hon. Elizabeth Vaughan, buried May 24, 1755." First wife of the present Earl of Lisburne, and daughter of Joseph Gascoigne Nightingale, Esq. "Theodosia Charlotta Vaughan, (daughter of Lord Lisburne,) buried April 30, 1773."
"Susanna Wells, buried Oct. 5, 1763." The woman at whose house Elizabeth Canning, of famous memory, was said to have been confined. The strange and mysterious affair of Canning and the gipsey engaged a very considerable share of the public attention during the years 1753 and 1754. To those who do not remember that period, and by accident have never heard of this extraordinary affair, it may be necessary to mention briefly, that Elizabeth Canning, a servant girl, having been to visit a relation on New-year's day 1753, did not return to her master's house that night, nor was she heard of for a month afterwards; when she came to her mother's, in a very emaciated and deplorable condition, and affirmed, that on the night she disappeared, she had been attacked in Moor-fields by two men, who robbed her, and, carried her by force to the house of one Mother Wells at Enfield-wash (fn. 184), where she had been confined till the day of her return, when she effected her escape by jumping out of a window. During the whole time of her confinement, she declared, that she had existed upon a few crusts of bread and a pitcher of water. She accused, at the same time, an old woman, of cutting off her stays; and some days afterwards, being taken to the house at Enfield-wash, fixed the charge upon one Mary Squires, a travelling gipsey, then at Wells's. In consequence of these charges, both Squires and Wells were apprehended, and tried at the Old Bailey; the former was condemned to be hanged, and the latter was burned in the hand and imprisoned. Canning's story, nevertheless, was so extraordinary, and in some of its leading circumstances so improbable and inconsistent, that many people were induced to suspect an imposture. After the trial of Squires and Wells, new matter of suspicion arose; and in the course of some inquiries, which were very laudably set on foot by Sir Crisp Gascoyne, the Lord Mayor, very ample evidence was obtained of the innocence of Mary Squires, and the guilt of Canning. The result of these inquiries was laid before the King, who referred the whole matter to the Attorney and Solicitor General, (Sir Dudley Ryder, and the late Earl Mansfield, then William Murray, Esq.) and in consequence of their declaration, that the weight of evidence was in favour of the gipsey, she received his Majesty's pardon, and Wells was discharged from her confinement. It was now Canning's turn to be prosecuted, and she was brought to the bar at the Old Bailey, May 1, 1754, being charged with wilful and corrupt perjury. The trial lasted seven days, when, after a patient and impartial hearing, the alibi of Mary Squires having been proved, by one of the most extraordinary chains of evidence which ever was brought before a court of justice, Canning was found guilty, and sentenced to seven years transportation.—Such is the summary of a story, which occupied, in a most uncommon degree, the attention of the public, who were divided into two parties, not unaptly called the Egyptians and the Canningites; and with such zeal did the partisans on each side support their favourite cause, that it was not unfrequent for the best friends to quarrel when they failed of convincing each other upon this mysterious and complicated affair. Canning's was the popular party; the mob were so zealously attached to her interest, that they proceeded to the most violent outrages, grossly insulting the Lord Mayor, breaking his coach windows, and even threatening his life (fn. 185).
Henley entertained the audience, at his oratory, with eulogiums upon ber, and invectives against her adversaries; nor were there wanting persons of the most respectable character, who gave her their countenance and support, and contributed largely to the subscriptions, which, in every stage of the business, and even after the event of her trial, were solicited and obtained for her (fn. 186). Perhaps, it is not to be wondered at, that they who had originally espoused the girl's cause, from a conviction of her innocence and sufferings, should, while their minds were still under the influence of prejudice, continue to maintain the same opinion even after her trial (fn. 187), since an unprejudiced reader, even at this distance of time, must bestow some attention upon the weight and credibility of contradictory evidence, before he can decide upon what is now generally allowed the perjury of Canning, and the innocence of Squires. Dr. Hill was the first who wrote in favour of the gipsey; Allan Ramsay, under a fictitious character, took the same side. The anonymous pamphlets upon the subject, and the prints, were very numerous (fn. 188).
"Sir Samuel Bickley, Bart. buried July 29, 1773." His ancestor, Francis Bickley of Attleborough in Norfolk, was created a baronet by Charles II. anno 1661. This man, with whom the title became extinct, dishonoured a respectable family from which he was descended, by crimes which involved him in distress and infamy. Having undergone a disgraceful punishment some years before at Lincoln, he ended his days at the King's Head in Enfield, in extreme want.
"Thomas Hills, son of Thomas and Susanna Everitt, baptized "Feb. 16, 1779." This child, though not remarkably large at its birth, began, when six weeks old, to grow to a very extraordinary size. His dimensions were taken when at the age of nine months and two weeks, by Mr. Sherwen, an ingenious surgeon at Enfield, and compared with those of a lusty boy seven years old. The result was as follows:
The child's height was 3 feet 1¾ inch (fn. 189). His extraordinary size tempted the parents to carry him to London, and exhibit him to the public. I saw him myself in April 1780; and recollect hearing that he died soon after. The dimensions of the child, as given in the hand-bills distributed at the place of exhibition, and under a print of Mrs. Everitt and her son, published in January 1780, were taken when he was eleven months old; his height was then 3 feet 3 inches; his girth round the breast, 2 feet 6 inches; the loins, 3 feet 1 inch; the thigh, 1 foot 10 inches; the leg, 1 foot 2 inches; the arm, 11½ inches; the wrist, 9 inches. Children of remarkably large growth have frequently been exhibited to the public, but generally at the age of five or six years. In the Philosophical Transactions is an account of Thomas Hall, born at Willingham in Cambridgeshire, who, at the age of two years and ten months, had attained to a very extraordinary size, though it appears, by his dimensions there given, that he was not so large as Everitt at the age of eleven months (fn. 190). In 1782, a gigantic child, whose name was Isaac Butterfield, born at Keighley near Leeds, Feb. 20, 1781, was exhibited at the cane-shop in Springgardens. In November 1782, he measured (according to the advertisement in the public papers (fn. 191) 3 feet in height, 13 inches round his arm, 2 feet 2 inches round his thigh, 16 inches across his shoulders, and weighed near a hundred weight. These dimensions, if they may be depended on, exceed those of Everitt. The child died in Spring-gardens Feb. 1, 1783 (fn. 192).
"Sr Thomas Halifax, Knt. buried Feb. 17, 1789." Alderman of the city of London, and lord mayor in 1776. He lived in a house on the chase-side, which formerly belonged to the Pettiward family, and was sold by the late Roger Pettiward, D. D. to William Cosmo, Duke of Gordon.
Jasper Jenkins, Esq. is said to have died at Enfield, May 25, 1772, aged 106; and Mr. Long, a farmer at Forty-hill, July 14, 1773, aged 102 (fn. 193). The latter is well ascertained.
William Wickham, son of John Wickham of Enfield, (by Barbara, only daughter of William Parker, a collateral ancestor of the Macclesfield family, who married Margaret, daughter of John Wroth, Esq. of Durants,) was born in that parish, in the manorhouse of Honylands, or Pentriches, (as I suppose,) of which his father occurs as lessee in the reign of Henry VIII. (fn. 194) He became a member of King's–college in Cambridge about 1556, was made Dean of Lincoln in 1577, Bishop of that diocese anno 1584, and translated thence to Winchester in 1595. Fuller says, he was equal to any of his order in piety and painfulness, though little of him is extant in print (fn. 195). He preached the funeral sermon for the Queen of Scots, at Peterborough, anno 1587. Bishop Wickham died at his house in Southwark anno 1596 (fn. 196).
In the year 1507, John Carew, als. Crowe, Esq. son of Roger Carew, Esq. being seised of a messuage or tenement, called Poynetts, and divers lands and tenements in the parishes of South Bensleet, Hadley, and Thundersley in Essex, enseossed certain persons thereof, for the uses and purposes specified in an annexed schedule (fn. 197), viz. "to teach children within the towne of Enfelde to know and reade "their alphabet letters, to read Latin and English, and to understande grammar, and to wright their lateines accordinge to the use and trade of grammar scholes; towardes the sindinge of a scholemaister the somme of 6 powndes thirtene shillings and sourpence; the remainder, after the necessary reductions for repairs, &c. to be distributed unto the poor impotent people inhabiting in the said parish, and such other good and godlie dedes, intents, and purposes as the seossees, or the more part of them shold think mete." This schedule is recited in a declaration of uses, dated 1558–9. By a later declaration of uses, dated 1621, the school-master's salary is raised to 20l. (fn. 198) The sum of 261. is now added to his salary as lecturer, and 401. is given to the parish, out of their unappropriated stock, to the assistant school-master. Roger Grave left 2l. per ann. to the school-master. The present school-house, adjoining to the church-yard, was purchased, and rebuilt by the parishioners at their own charge. In the declaration of uses, dated 1621, it is called the new-built school. William Garratt, citizen of London, who died in 1586, left the sum of 50l. towards building a school-house at Enfield, where he was born (fn. 199). The Bensleet estate, which consists of two hundred and seventy acres of land, is now let at 80l. per annum (fn. 200). In 1599, it produced only 36l. per annum; and in 1616, and 1645, 50l.
The sum of 17l. 6s. 4d. is distributed annually in bread in this parish. It arises from a part of the interest of 400l. 3 per cent. consol. Bank annuities accruing from the sale of timber on the Benfleet estate, and from the following benefactions, viz. 1l. 14s. the neat receipt of forty shillings per ann. left by Robert Bannister in 1585; 2l. 11s. 4d. the produce of a close and tenement purchased with 30l. bequeathed for that purpose by George Cock, anno 1635; 2l. 12s. by the will of Jasper Nichols, being a part of the produce of a house and lands in Enfield; 1l. 7s. 10d. the interest of 50l. left by Mary Nichols anno 1751, to be distributed in bread on the anniversary of her burial; and 1l. 14s. 6d. the interest of 50l. left anno 1772, by Frederick Maurer, Esq. to be distributed at the discretion of the minister and church-wardens. A benefaction of 10s. per annum, left anno 1681, by Thomas Piggott, for bread, has been lost.
Sir Nicholas Raynton, anno 1646, left 10l. per annum, producing only 81. clear of deductions, to put out three children apprentice, paid by the Company of Haberdashers out of houses in London. Henry Dixon, citizen and draper of London, by his will anno 1693, left all his estates in the parishes of Benington and Munden in Hertfordshire, Enfield in Middlesex, and St. Mildred in the Poultry, London, to the Drapers' Company, for the purpose of apprenticing poor boys above the age of fifteen; such as bear his christian and surname, wheresoever born, are to be preferred in the first instance, and to receive 5l. as an apprentice see, and 5l. at the expiration of their apprenticeship; secondly, such as bear his surname only, to whom 4l. is allotted in like manner; thirdly, poor boys born, and resident in either of the parishes above-mentioned, to receive the same as the last; fourthly, the sons of tenants of any of his lands devised, wheresoever born, to receive 3l. only in like manner; and lastly, any poor boys whom the Court of Assistants belonging to the Drapers' Company shall nominate; these to receive 4l.
Anne Osbourn, anno 1666, left part of the profits of lands (to be purchased pursuant to her will, with the sum of 100l.) for the purpose of educating one fatherless or motherless child, or more if the rents would allow of it. Mary Turpin, anno 1775, left the interest of 200l. (laid out in the purchase of 240l. 3 per cent. consol. Bank annuities) for the purpose of educating three girls.
The following annual pensions are paid to the poor from donations, viz. 12l. 12s. each to six poor men, out of the rents of houses left for that purpose by Thomas Wilson, anno 1590, and now producing, clear of all deductions, 75l. 12s. per ann. (N. B. This will be farther increased after Midsummer 1795); to one poor woman, 3l. 13s. 4d. being a benefaction of William Smith, anno 1592; to four poor women, 10l. each, being the rent of a house (now the Greyhound inn) left by John David anno 1620; to two poor women, 2l. each, the benefaction of John Deycrowe, anno 1627, being a rentcharge upon a farm in Enfield; to six poor women, 2l. each, bequeathed by Henry Lost anno 1631; to four poor widows, 1l. 10s. each, paid out of Anne Osbourn's benefaction, anno 1666; to four poor persons of Ponder's-end-quarter, 2l. 10s. each, being the interest of 333l. 6s. 8d. 3 per cent. consol. Bank annuities, purchased with the principal and accumulated interest of 100l. left in 1735 to the poor of that division by Richard Darby, Esq. the payment of which had been withheld till 1776, when the court of Chancery ordered both the principal and interest to be paid. Annual pensions of forty shillings each are given also by the parish to three poor persons, being the interest of a part of the Benfleet timber-money, and the surplus of Jasper Nichols's gift.
Mr. Robert Barnevelt, by his will, bearing date 1785, left an annuity of 100l. expiring in the year 1808, to be divided between ten poor persons of Enfield, being of the age of 65 years, not receiving alms, and residing in the town-quarter; five of them to be men, and five women, to be appointed by the vicar, with the concurrence of the churchwarden and overseer, and six reputable inhabitants of the town-quarter. Mr. Barnevelt died in 1786.
Mary Nichols, above-mentioned, gave the sum of 900l. to purchase an organ; the overplus to be appropriated towards a salary for the organist. The interest of this sum (being 319l. 8s. 10½d. 3 per cent. consol. Bank annuities,) is 9l. 11s. 8d. The parish adds 14l. 11s. 8d.
Sir Henry Wroth, in consideration of being permitted to inclose a part of Stonard's-field, agreed to settle on the parish a rent-charge of 1l. 7s. 6d. This is distributed among the poor of Ponder's-endquarter.
King James I. as a compensation for having taken part of the chase into Theobalds-park, gave the parish of Enfield a sum of money, with which was purchased an estate at North Mims, producing a clear rent of 16l. 9s.; this is at the disposal of the vestry. The site of the market-place, given to the parish also by King James, with the prosits of the market, (now discontinued,) produce 37l. per annum. Out of this, and the last-mentioned sum, the taxes for the school-house are paid, and 40l. given to the usher. But this is at the discretion of the vestry.
The greater part of the chase allotment, belonging to this parish, (viz. 1530 acres) remains as waste land, on which the inhabitants have right of common. Two hundred acres are cultivated, and on an average worth thirty shillings an acre. One-half of the produce is appropriated to the reduction of the land-tax; the other to the reduction of the poor rates. This part of the allotment is tithefree.
In an old book of accounts, relating to the disposal of the gifts, is the following memorandum, dated 1643: "Delivered to Mr. John Wilford out of the storehouse, for the buyinge and providinge of 8 horse and furniture, charged upon this towne, the 21 of August, 50l."
Since the former part of Enfield was printed off, I have learned, (through the favour of Mr. J'Anson, agent of that estate,) that the manor of Elsinge, or Norris-farm, was aliened by Richard Wilford, Esq. anno 1707, to John Cotton, Esq. who sold it, anno 1734, to Robert Mackeris, Esq. Mr. Mackeris devised it to his widow, under whom the present proprietors (Sarah, wife of Richard Pinnock, Esq.—Fenwick, Esq. and James Handley, Esq.) claim.