House of Lords Journal Volume 15: 23 February 1694

Page 377

Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 15, 1691-1696. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

Page 377

In this section

DIE Veneris, 23 Februarii.

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:

Epus. London.
Epus. Durham.
Epus. Rochester.
Epus. Sarum.
Epus. Chester.
Epus. Worcester.
Epus. Ely.
Epus. Peterborough.
Epus. Gloucester.
Epus. St. Asaph.
Ds. Præses.
Ds. Custos Privati Sigilli.
Dux Norffolke.
Dux Somersett.
Dux Ormond.
Dux St. Albans.
Dux Bolton.
Dux Sconbergh.
March. Halifax.
Ds. Senescallus.
Ds. Camerarius.
Comes Oxon.
Comes Kent.
Comes Huntingdon.
Comes Bridgewater.
Comes North'ton.
Comes Manchester.
Comes Mulgrave.
Comes Rivers.
Comes Stamford.
Comes Winchilsea.
Comes Thanet.
Comes Sunderland.
Comes Scarsdale.
Comes Essex.
Comes Bathe.
Comes Craven.
Comes Ailesbury.
Comes Sussex.
Comes Feversham.
Comes Maclesfeld.
Comes Berkeley.
Comes Nottingham.
Comes Rochester.
Comes Portland.
Comes Monmouth.
Comes Montagu.
Comes Marleborough.
Comes Torrington.
Viscount Newport.
Viscount Sidney.
Ds. Willoughby Er.
Ds. Berkeley B. 2.
Ds. Lawarr. 1.
Ds. Morley.
Ds. Eure.
Ds. Wharton.
Ds. Hunsdon.
Ds. Sidney.
Ds. Lovelace.
Ds. Maynard.
Ds. Vaughan.
Ds. Ward.
Ds. Gulpeper.
Ds. Lucas.
Ds. Berkeley Str.
Ds. Granville.
Ds. Cornwallis.
Ds. Godolphin.
Ds. Cholmondeley.
Ds. Butler.


Addison versus Haddock.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Thomas Addison and Henry Inman, Merchants, from a Decree made in Their Majesties Court of Exchequer, the Thirtieth Day of November, in the Third Year of Their now Majesties Reign, on a Bill there brought by Timothy Haddock Plaintiff, against the Appellants then Defendants; and praying the Reversal of the said Decree:

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Timothy Haddock may have a Copy of the said Petition; and shall and he is hereby required to put in his Answer thereunto, in Writing, on Friday the Sixteenth Day of March next, at Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon.

Sir S. Swale versus Winchcombe.

Upon hearing Counsel this Day, at the Bar, upon the Petition and Appeal of Sir Solomon Swale Baronet (Son of Henry Swale deceased, and Grandson of Sir Solomon Swale), from a Decree made in the Court of Chancery, the Three and Twentieth Day of February, One Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-two; as also upon the Answer of Anne Winchcombe Widow put in thereunto:

After due Consideration had of what was offered by Counsel thereupon, it is ORDERED and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Petition and Appeal of Sir Solomon Swale shall be, and is hereby, dismissed this House; and that the Decree therein complained of shall be, and is hereby, affirmed.

Exhibits, whether directed to be used at a Trial at Law.

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Clerks report what Precedents they have found, relating to the Case of the Earl of Montagu and the Earl of Bathe, To-morrow, at Eleven of the Clock.


Dominus Custos Magni Sigilli declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Sabbati, (videlicet,) 24um diem instantis Februarii, hora undecima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.