Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 15, 1691-1696. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
DIE Martis, 4 Decembris.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:
The Lord Keeper (pursuant to the Order Yesterday) repeated to the Judges the Reprimand given them the Ninth Day of February, One Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-three.
Thornehill & al. Creditors of Chute versus Parker & al.
Upon reading the Petition of Philadelphia Parker and others; praying longer Time for answering to the Petition of Jeremiah Thornehill and others, Creditors of George Chute Esquire, presented to this House the Seven and Twentieth Day of November last:
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Philadelphia Parker and others have hereby Time allowed them for answering thereunto, until Tuesday the Eleventh Day of this Instant December, at Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon.
E. of Banbury, Proceedings against the Person who claimed the Title of, in the King's Bench:
After Their Majesties Attorney General had given the House an Account of the Proceedings in the Court of King's Bench, in relation to the Person who claimed the Title of Earl of Banbury; and Debate thereupon:
The Question was put, "Whether the House shall be now adjourned?"
It was Resolved in the Negative.
Record of the Indictment, &c. to be brought in.
And ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the proper Officer in the Court of King's Bench do bring before this House, To-morrow, at Eleven of the Clock, the Record of the Indictment of Charles Knowles, who claimed the Title of Earl of Banbury, and the Proceedings of that Court thereupon.
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Debate this Day, touching the Proceedings in the Court of King's Bench, in relation to the Person who claimed the Title of Earl of Banbury, shall be adjourned until To-morrow, at Eleven of the Clock in the Forenoon.
Bishop of London versus Regem, in Error.
The Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench, in the usual Manner, brought in a Writ of Error,
Epus. London. & al. Plaintiffs, versus
Domin. Regem et Reginam, Defendants.
Dominus Custos Magni Sigilli declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Mercurii, (videlicet,) quantum diem instantis Decembris, hora undecima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.