Analytical Index To the Series of Records Known As the Remembrancia 1579-1664. Originally published by EJ Francis, London, 1878.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
Suits and suitors.
I. 149. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
informing him that certain property in the house of Thomas Knolles,
belonging to Richard Brakenbury, one of the Gentlemen Ushers to
Her Majesty, had been attached by Samuel Knolles, and the sale
thereof proceeded with in secret without any lawful demand of the
debt due being made, and directing the Lord Mayor to call before
him the two brothers, Thomas and Samuel Knolles, and to ascertain
what had been done with the goods, to sequester them, and put them
into safe custody. If they refused to obey the order, he should
commit them to close prison, there to remain without bail until further
21st October, 1580.
I. 154. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor
and Sheriffs, upon the complaint of Richard Brakenbury, against
Samuel and Thomas Knolles. The Council, understanding that they
purposely absented themselves in contempt of their Warrant, &c.,
empowered the Lord Mayor to enter their houses, or other houses
where they should learn either the parties or goods to be, and
apprehend the prisoners and commit them into close custody, taking
their oaths as to what part of the goods had been sold, and to whom,
to seize the goods wherever they might be found, and to certify immediately what steps had been taken, in order that other measures
might be adopted.
31st October, 1580.
I. 155. Letter from William Lord Burghley to the Lord Mayor
upon the same subject. Samuel Knolles, Merchant, had repaired that
day to the Court, purposing to exhibit some bill against Brakenbury.
The Council had thought it good, before entering into any examination
thereof, to commit him in safe custody to be delivered to the Lord
Mayor, notwithstanding he had informed them that he had satisfied
the contents of their Letter to the late Lord Mayor. They further
directed proceedings to be taken against him according to the tenour
of the letters sent.
31st October, 1580.
I. 156. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lords of the Council.
He had examined the prisoners touching Mr. Brakenbury's goods, and
found that some of the goods had been delivered in to the Chamber of
London. The prisoners affirmed that the rest were sold for 25l.,
which sum had been paid into the Chamber; but they refused to deliver
the goods supposed to have been sold, and prayed to be heard before
the Council. They had, therefore, been committed to ward in the
Compter, there to remain until the Council's pleasure should be made
3rd November, 1580.
I. 159. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
authorizing the release of Samuel and Thomas Knolles, who had
promised to redeem and restore the whole of the goods, &c., for the
use of Brakenbury in a good state. Upon their complying, the 25l.
paid into the Chamber might be repaid to them.
6th November, 1580.
I. 170. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor
and Sheriffs, requiring them without delay to administer justice in the
suit in the Sheriffs Court between John and Edmund Madocks.
11th January, 1580.
I. 191. Letter from Sir Francis Walsingham to the Lord Mayor
and Aldermen on behalf of a poor woman who had laid her supplication before the Queen, and which had subsequently been forwarded
to the Lord Mayor for his consideration. She had returned, complaining that the matter had not been properly looked into. He
requested that her case might be decided, and so prevent her from
importuning Her Majesty again.
8th March, 1580.
I. 204. Letter from Sir Francis Walsingham to the Lord Mayor.
By order of the Queen he had forwarded the Petition of Elizabeth
Penies to be examined by some persons nominated by him. They
had examined her case, but had deferred judgment. He requested
that steps might be at once taken to determine the suit.
21st May, 1581.
I. 205. Letter from the Lord Mayor to Sir Francis Walsingham
in reply. The cause had been committed to two discreet Citizens,
Thomas Ware and Thomas Riggs, who had examined the parties and
proofs, when it appeared that she had no right to that which she
14th June, 1581.
I. 220. Letter from John (Aylmer), Lord Bishop of London, to
the Lord Mayor, thanking him for the favour shown to his servant
and collector, George Benison, and requesting him to judge all the
causes, and give order accordingly.
Fulham, 9th July, 1581.
I. 230. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor.
By a previous Order of the Council, certain goods of Richard Brakenbury, pretended to be recevered by Samuel Knolles, by way of
attachment, were delivered in sequestration to the custody of the late
Lord Mayor or the Chamberlain of the City, to be delivered to those
having the right thereunto. The Council direct the Lord Mayor to
deliver the said goods to Brakenbury, he having consented to answer
any charge made by Knolles.
14th April, 1581.
I. 239. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
Aldermen and Sheriffs, for the time being, informing them of the
distress of William Handford, a Merchant of the City, and enclosing
a supplication from some Aldermen and other wealthy creditors
desiring that some steps might be taken to assist him. The Council
had directed that both he and his creditors should be heard before
the Lord Mayor, and some arrangement made. In the mean time he
should be freed from arrest and his goods from attachment.
30th June, 1581.
I. 240. The supplication to the Queen of Thomas Starkey, (fn. 1) and
Richard Martin, Aldermen, and other creditors, in favour of William
Handford, Merchant, referred to in the letter of the Lords of the
Council, follows at length.
I. 251. Letter from Sir Owen Hopton to the Lord Mayor, concerning the case of a poor woman, a neighbour of his, in Tower Street,
who had been promised an interest in the house she lived in. She
had been arrested, and attempts made to put her out of the house,
contrary to all equity. He therefore desired that the poor woman's
cause might be heard.
The Tower, 31st March, 1581.
I. 252. Letter from Thomas (Earl of) Sussex (fn. 2) to the Lord
Mayor. His servant Smith had a lantern of glass made for him,
and one Martin, a bankrupt, had caused the said lantern to be
stayed. As he desired to use it that evening at a supper, to be given
by him to the French Commissioners, he requested it might be
delivered to his servant, upon his giving bond to answer the said
Arundel House, 4th May, 1581.
I. 257. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Chancellor.
Upon a suit depending between Elizabeth Rascall, Plaintiff, and
Inigo Jones, Defendant, before the Sheriffs of London, touching
certain slanderous words, a verdict had been passed against the
Defendant, and excessive damages had been assessed by the Jury at
10l., besides costs. The matter, after verdict, according to the custom
of this City, being marked and brought before him, and by him
throughly and at large examined, he could not find any reasonable
grounds for such excessive damages, the Plaintiff being very little
damnified by the words, which were spoken only in jest, without any
appearance of malice. He had passed an order that the Plaintiff
should receive in respect of the whole damages, &c., 5l. The
Plaintiff, moved by some troublesome and busy solicitor, had since
procured a writ to proceed to judgment against the Defendant. He
therefore requested his Lordship's consideration of the whole matter,
who well knew how in such cases the authority of the Mayor had been
always used to good equity, and that he would direct the writ to be
13th September, 1581.
I. 266. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor.
They had been informed by the Commissioners appointed to deal in
the causes of poor prisoners committed for debt to Her Majesty's
Bench, that one of the prisoners there, Thomas Barton, had entered
into a bond to William Stevenson of the City, as security for the debt
of Thomas Grene, for nonpayment whereof he had been committed
to prison. The Commissioners hearing the matter, had taken order
that Stevenson should have his principal with interest, which he
refused to accept, or to appear before them. The Council therefore
required the Lord Mayor to call before him Mr. Young, one of the
Commissioners, and to take steps to compel Stevenson to appear
before the Council.
21st September, 1581.
I. 274. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
Sheriffs, and Aldermen. They had been credibly informed of the
hard estate of Nicholas Jones. He had a great quantity of goods
abroad, as well beyond sea as on this side, with which, being recovered,
he would be able to satisfy his creditors without loss. They desired
that the creditors might be induced to take reasonable conditions for
their repayment, and that in the mean time Jones might seek the
recovery of his goods; and that order might be given to the Sheriffs
and Secondaries of the Compters not to arrest him, or proceed by action
or attachment against him or his goods until he had finished this
treaty with his creditors.
3rd October, 1581.
I. 303. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor.
In previous letters they had directed the stay of all suits and arrests
against Nicholas Jones, Merchant of the City, since which time they
had been informed by William Moore and John Weston of Basingstoke, that he, under colour of the Council's letters, had sought to
defraud them. They therefore requested the Lord Mayor to call
Jones before him, and arrange for the satisfying of his creditors.
Attachments had been issued against the ship the Black Greyhound, lately arrived from Barbary, and the Council desired the same
to be stayed until the crew had been satisfied, according to an Order
of the Judge of the Admiralty.
11th March, 1581.
I. 304. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor
and Sheriffs. Besides the other complaints mentioned in their previous
letter, Jones had forcibly turned Hipolito Buaimonto and other
merchants out of their lodgings and counting-houses. He also refused
to admit them upon the demand made by one of the City officers.
One of the Sheriffs should forthwith repair to the house, and take
order that the said strangers might be put into possession of their
lodgings and counting-houses, and restored to such money, writings,
&c., as belonged to them. Jones should also be brought before the
Lord Mayor, and unless he gave sufficient satisfaction to his creditors,
he should be committed to the custody of the Sheriffs, and the
Council informed of the steps taken.
12th March, 1581.
I. 312. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lords of the Council
in reply. Mr. Sheriff Webb, together with Mr. Secretary's servant
and the Sheriff's officers, had repaired to the house of Nicholas Jones,
and, after great persuasion, had been admitted. Jones alleged against
the strangers matters of great importance touching the State, saying
that the French ambassador resorted to them in person, and that there
were very suspicious conferences between them, and writings of dangerous matter of State were kept in their counting-houses, all of which
he offered to substantiate before the Council. The Sheriff, not knowing how far these matters might be true, induced Jones to have the locks
removed, and entered the Chambers with his officers and Mr. Secretary's servant, allowing the strangers to take such money as they had
there. The writings had been delivered to Mr. Secretary's servant,
and the strangers in the mean time had been taken home to the
Sheriff's house, and Jones committed to the custody of one of his
12th March, 1581.
I. 321. Letter from the Mayor and Jurats of Faversham to the
Lord Mayor. Thomas Barming, one of the Jurats of the Town and
Liberty of Faversham, Kent, one of the Members of the Cinque Ports,
lost two pieces of cloth, called white bayes, of the value of 5l. 13s.,
which had been traced to the possession of Randall Wight, of London,
Porter, who had been sundry times required to deliver the same to
Barming, but had fraudulently withheld the goods, and had since sold
them, appropriating the money to his own use. They requested the
Lord Mayor to call Wight before him and examine into the matter,
and compel him to pay Barming his damages together with all costs
and charges sustained.
7th April, 24th of Elizabeth (1582).
I. 322. Letter from the Mayor and Jurats of Faversham to the Lord
Mayor. John Hall, Fishmonger, of the Parish of St. Nicholas Golden
Abbey, (fn. 3) London, in the Ward of Bread Street, had employed Abraham
Snode, Mariner, of Faversham, one of the members of the Cinque
Ports, to carry in his hoy, called the Mary, certain malt, &c., to be
shipped on board the John, riding at anchor in the East Swail, for
which service he owed him 4l. 3s. 1d., which he neglected to pay.
They requested the Lord Mayor to call Hall before him, and examine
into the matter, and compel him to pay the debt with the costs and
6th April, 24th of Elizabeth, 1582.
I. 360. Letter from the Lord Mayor to Sir Edmund Anderson, (fn. 4)
Knight, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, and Sir Roger
Manwood, Knight, Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer, with reference
to the complaint of the poor lame man at the Sermon yesterday, when
their Lordships were present. He had ascertained the matter referred
to a title of lands in the country, and a judgment of writings requiring
skill in law. Both parties being without his jurisdicition, he begged
to submit the case to their merciful disposition.
I. 364. Letter from the Mayor and Jurats of the Town of
Faversham to the Lord Mayor and Aldermen, calling attention to
their former Letter, complaining of the conduct of Randolph Wight
towards Thomas Barming.
14th of June, in the 24th of Elizabeth (1582).
I. 377. Letter from Sir Francis Walshingham to the Lord Mayor
and Aldermen. He had been informed that Ralph Broke, (fn. 5) one of the
Pursuivants-at-Arms to Her Majesty, had been molested and troubled
by one Bradshaw upon a surmise that he had not paid a certain sum
of money to him according to an award made by the late Lord Mayor
between the parties. He had also heard that there had been some
advantage and indirect dealing used against Broke while he had been
busied in the execution of his office abroad. He desired the Lord
Mayor and Aldermen to call the parties before them, and take such
order therein that Broke might not be molested.
16th July, 1582.
I. 421. Letter from the Lord Mayor to Mr. Serjeant Fleetwood,
Recorder, concerning certain processes served upon him by the name
of Thomas Blanck, (fn. 6) without addition of Mayoralty, and upon Sir
James Harvey, at the suit of Walter Garnons, butcher.
10th November, 1582.
I. 471. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
informing him that Edward Wingfield, Gentleman, son and heir
apparent to Thomas Wingfield, Esq., of Kimbolton, Huntingdonshire,
had contracted certain debts whilst under age to sundry persons
within the City. The Council had thought it meet to recommend the
Lord Chancellor to examine into the said debts, and in the mean
time to request the Lord Mayor to give instructions to the Sheriffs and
Officers of the City Courts not to suffer any actions to be proceeded
with against the said Wingfield or his securities.
28th January, 1582.
I. 486. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Chancellor. He
had received Her Majesty's writ to proceed to judgement against
Edward Ray for the sum of 3l. 10s. The matter, according to the
usages of the City, had been heard before him, in the presence of both
parties, when it was proved that Ray, through his wife, had satisfied
the claim, which settlement he requested the Lord Chancellor to confirm.
22nd February, 1582.
I. 489. Letter from Sir Thomas Bromley, Lord Chancellor, to
the Lord Mayor, as to a suit depending before the late Lord Mayor,
between William Sanderson, Merchant, and Thomas Thornton, for a
debt of 70l. lent by the former three years previously. Although a
verdict had been given in his favour, execution had been stayed. The
Lord Chancellor therefore requested that he might receive justice
without further delay.
25th February, 1582.
I. 491. Letter from the Lord Mayor to Sir Thomas Bromley,
Lord Chancellor, in reply. The examination of the differences had
been referred to sundry men of approved wisdom, upon whose report
he had caused the matter to be remitted to judgement. Thornton had
since alleged some further matter for consideration, and by the advice
of Mr. Recorder and the Aldermen execution had been stayed, and
the subject referred to Mr. Recorder, Anthony Gage, (fn. 7) and Robert
Offley, (fn. 8) which proceedings Sanderson objected to. He therefore
requested his Lordship to appoint some convenient hearing of the
cause before him, or otherwise to direct what steps should be taken.
26th February, 1582.
I. 492. Letter from Sir Thomas Bromley, Knight, Lord Chancellor, to the Lord Mayor. In October last he had received letters
from Sir James Harvey, Knight, late Lord Mayor, and from Mr.
Recorder, on behalf of John Lawnde, for the stay of writs "de procedendo ad judicium," sued out against him by Adam Sutcliffe, in a suit
wherein there was a verdict passed against Lawnde, since which
nothing had been done to bring the matter to an end. The Lord
Chancellor therefore requested the Lord Mayor and Mr. Recorder to
call the parties before them, and to make some end of the cause.
22nd February, 1582.
I. 511. Letter from the Lord Mayor to Sir Francis Walsingham
concerning a suit by one Bayard, a Citizen, against George Cox.
Bayard had consented to submit the case to the decision of Mr. Alderman Martin and Mr. Alderman Rowe, but he now refused to be bound,
alleging the insufficiency of the surety offered him, and had cast Cox
again into prison. The Lord Mayor begged Sir Francis to proceed in
the matter, and to do therein as he considered best.
6th June, 1583.
I. 518. Letter from Sir Thomas Bromley, Lord Chancellor, to
the Lord Mayor and the Recorder, enclosing a petition of William
Grimes, and requesting that if, upon inquiry, they found it true, judgment should not be stayed.
29th June, 1583.
I. 522. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
enclosing a supplication exhibited to them by Thomas Hollinshed,
Citizen and Vintner, declaring how he had been deceived of a good
portion of money, under colour of a fraudulent gift made by one John
Gere to Ralph King, both Citizens, and recommending the Court of
Aldermen, with the assistance of the Recorder, to inquire into the
matter, and make such an Order as should be agreeable with justice
and equity, and if the parties refused to stand thereby, to inform
the Council of the steps taken.
15th July, 1583.
I. 555. Letter from Sir Roger Manwood (Chief Baron of the
Exchequer) to the Lord Mayor and Aldermen. Upon judgment
being given in the cause between Mr. Finch and Scofield, the money
delivered in execution for the discharge of Scofield's body should be
paid to Mr. Finch, upon his bringing a bond under the Common Seal
28th November, 1583.
I. 559. Letter from the Mayor and Jurats of Faversham to the
Lord Mayor and Aldermen, enclosing a Certificate, under the Common
Seal of the Cinque Ports, at the request of Christopher Finch, for
damages recovered of Richard Scofield.
2nd January, 1583.
I. 626. Letter from the Lord Mayor to Sir John Fortescue, one of
the Members of the Council. John Saule, father of the Lord Mayor's
servant, had been, with his goods, taken in execution for a debt which
he had entered into on behalf of Henry Mapleton, Esquire, upon the
assurance made to him of certain chantry lands in Lincolnshire, of which
he had now been informed by his counsel he could have no good assurance. He requested his commiseration and favour on his behalf.
13th January, 1591.
I. 640. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Treasurer.
According to his commandment he had caused to be attached
Domingo de Valdez, a Spaniard, and desired further directions as to
what should be done with him.
22nd February, 1591.
I. 661. Letter from the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen to
the Lords of the Council. In accordance with their recommendation
they had granted to Henry Pyndar, Brewer, protection against his
creditors, and had endeavoured to bring about a reasonable arrangement between them, but Pyndar, presuming upon the protection
accorded to him, had refused, and still carried on his trade. They
therefore suggested to the Council to withdraw such protection, and
permit his creditors to proceed against him and his securities.
29th May, 1592.
II. 128. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lords of the Council
on behalf of Thomas Bramley, who had been appointed by the
Common Council to perform certain important duties by land and
sea, but was prevented on account of a suit concerning goods to the
value of 1,000l., which had been detained at Marcelles, (fn. 9) and begging
that the suit might be dispatched with all diligence.
29th December, 1595.
II. 144. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lords of the Council.
Having called before him and his brethren the Aldermen (according
to the directions received from their Lordships), John Parker, Merchant, and Adrianson Marrmer, of Flushing, touching a debt for freight
of 110 tuns of wine, and 1,500 French crowns lent to Parker at the town
of Bordeaux, of which, upon examination, they found he intended to
defraud the said Marrmer, they had caused the wine to be put in safe
keeping, and committed Parker to the Computer until their Lordships'
pleasure should be made known.
5th February, 1595.
II. 265. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Board of Green Cloth
as to the arrears of some composition due to Mr. William Barrett, His
Majesty's late grocer, from certain merchants of the City. The
merchants were willing to pay such arrears according to the rates of
composition agreed upon with their Lordships in the 40th year of Her
late Majesty's reign.
II. 267. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Treasurer of
the Board of Green Cloth as to the reported refusal of John Mons,
Merchant, to pay certain rates of composition, and to supply spice for
His Majesty's household, as was alleged against him by William
21st June, 1606.
II. 331. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Chancellor,
acknowledging the receipt of his Letter, enclosing a Petition from the
creditors of John Garrett. He had called before him the Petitioners,
and, with their consent, appointed William Cockem and William
Greenewell arbitrators for Garrett, and Lawrence Greene and Andrew
Elym for Henry Den, and enclosed their award.
12th October, 1608.
II. 338. Letter from the Lord Mayor and Aldermen to the Lord
Chancellor, reporting the reference of the suit pending between Sir
Leonard Halliday (fn. 10) and Sir William Romney (fn. 11) and Thomas Farrington to certain Aldermen agreed upon between the parties.
24th December, 1608.
II. 341. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Chancellor
concerning the forfeiture of the security of Wilkenson, who became
bound to John Langley for the debt of James Swinton, with his
19th January, 1608.
II. 358. Letter from the Earl of Lennox to the Lord Mayor and
Aldermen concerning the complaint against one William Peirson, a
Merchant of the City, by Zachary Lyming, Alderman of Salisbury,
and requesting that he might be ordered to give such satisfaction as
justice and equity demanded.
22nd August, 1609.
II. 348. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Chancellor,
enclosing a Petition from Catherine Davis, a poor widow, imprisoned
at the suit of John Walsall for speaking some intemperate words, and
recommending her petition to his notice on account of her family.
18th August, 1609.
III. 84. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor.
A Petition had been presented to them by Peter Beavoire, concerning
a difference between Francis Browne and himself as to the tenancy of
a shop. They required the Lord Mayor to call the parties before
him, and cause them to name some indifferent persons to settle their
Last of February, 1612.
III. 85. Reply of the Lord Mayor. Beavoire had consented to
refer the matter to indifferent persons, but Browne had refused.
Having thereupon heard the cause, he forwarded his certificate of the
facts for their consideration.
Last of February, 1612.
III. 95. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor
and the Recorder (Sir Henry Montague), requesting them to mediate
with the creditors of Nicholas Leate, Merchant, and persuade them to
grant him a reasonable forbearance. If any of then were so void of
compassion that they could not be prevailed upon to assent thereto,
they should require them to appear personally before the Council to
maintain their refusal.
20th April, 1613.
III. 104. Letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Chancellor.
In obedience to his recommendation, he had, with the assistance of
his brethren the Aldermen, endeavoured to bring about a settlement
of the differences between Ferdinando Clutterbuck and his brother
Giles. Owing to the refusal of Giles, they had been unsuccessful, and
referred the further consideration of the matter to his Lordship.
3rd July, 1613.
IV. 1. Letter from Secretary Sir Ralph Winwood to the Lord
Mayor. Having required, for the good of the King's service, that one
Heath should not be set free without his knowledge, he had since
learned that Heath had agreed with his creditors, and was restrained
only upon his request. He therefore desired that he might be
required to give sureties for his appearance before the writer when
called upon, and set at liberty.
2nd November, 1615.
IV. 28. Process by way of Letter from the Mayor and Jurats of
Dover to the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen, reciting that their
Combarron, John Goulder, Merchant, of Dover, had complained to them
against Francis Needham, of Cornhill, in the City of London, Merchant, in aplea of trespass, as in their original Letters of Process to
the Lord Mayor and Aldermen directed was declared. Wherefore
they prayed, and in a friendly manner required, the Court of Aldermen to cause Needham to come before them, and to examine him
upon the contents of their original Letters of Process, and if need be
compel him to pay the debt and damages therein mentioned, with
reasonable costs, or else, by writing under the seal of the Office of
Mayoralty of the City of London, to signify sufficient cause why of
right their friendly request should not be accomplished, according to
the ancient liberties, privileges, and customs of the Cinque Ports.
Dated from Dover, under the Seal of the Office of Mayoralty there, the 22nd April, 1616.
V. 75. Petition of the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen to
Lord Verulam, Lord Chancellor, reciting that great grievance was felt
by themselves and the Citizens, by reason of His Majesty's references
in cases of persons insolvent, and his proceedings thereupon, whereby
the course of justice was frequently stopped. They had petitioned
His Majesty, who, having been informed that by such proceedings
all commerce was in danger of being stopped, when men knew not
how to be secured for money lent, had declared himself utterly
averse to such references as either compelled the creditor or stopped
justice, and had informed them that they were not granted with
his privity or consent, but were presented for his signature in other
forms, and afterwards received some tincture from other hands. The
Petitioners, therefore, fearing that such adulterate references might
come before his Lordship, had thought fit to inform him thereof, that
he might be confirmed in the honourable courses he had lately held,
for the suppression of such references and bills of conformity.
Dated in margin 17th July, 1620.
V. 90. Letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor,
enclosing a Petition from Richard Husband, a Merchant of the City,
for a protection for himself, his sureties and goods, for one year. As
they understood he had been a merchant of trade and credit, they
were willing to afford him their mediation with the King for preserving his estate from ruin, if the allegations in his Petition were true,
of which they requested the Lord Mayor to inform himself, and to
17th November, 1620.
V. 122. Letter from "John Lincoln," Lord Keeper (fn. 12) to the Lord
Mayor. Upon the Petition of Henry Lowe, Matthew Broad, and
others, complaining that Sir William St. John and others (contractors
for discovery), who had employed them in a voyage as factors for
Gambia, had, upon their return, refused to pay them anything, although
some of the contractors were willing to do so, he had thought good
to request the Lord Mayor to call the parties before him for settlement of their differences, if possible, or otherwise to certify him of the
truth of the matter, that such further order might be taken as should
be agreeable to equity and good conscience.
Westminster College, 17th December, 1621.
VI. 3. Petition of Zachary Alley, of London, to the King, complaining that having been steward to Mr. Alderman James Cambell (fn. 13)
during his Shrievalty, Abraham Taylor being at the same time his
cashier, Taylor had not only refused to pay him for daily disbursements
for provision of his house and money lent, but had obtained the money
again from his master. Taylor had refused to have the matter settled,
either by his master or by reference to indifferent persons, by which
means the Petitioner was in daily danger of arrest. He therefore
prayed that the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen might be directed
to call Taylor before them and end the differences, or take such course
for the Petitioner's relief as to the Court should seem equitable.
VI. 4. Order from the King thereon, signed by Sir Edward
Powell, (fn. 14) referring the above Petition to the Lord Mayor and Court of
Aldermen, or any two of them, to call the parties before them, and
mediate some agreement for the Complainant's relief.
Whitehall, 19th January, 1622.
VI. 5. Letter of the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen to Sir
Edward Powell thereon. They had called the parties before them
and endeavoured to pursue His Majesty's direction. Although they
had received certificate from very able accountants that there was
great probability the Petitioner had been wronged, they could not
induce Taylor to refer himself either to the Court of Aldermen, or any
of them, or his late master Alderman Cambell.
VI. 18. Letter from the Lord Mayor and Court of Aldermen to
the Lord Keeper. They had received by Mr. Jones, the Common
Serjeant, a motion made by his Lordship for further consideration by
way of recompense to one William Wright, for some wrong pretended
to have been received by him from the Court of Aldermen, and of
which he had made complaint to His Majesty. They forwarded him
particulars of the steps taken by them in the matter.
17th July, 1623.