13.—The Great Change
All Hallows church had an intimate and tragic connexion with the
beginnings of the Reformation in England. One of the earliest of those
who suffered death for conscience' sake was the aged bishop John Fisher,
who was executed on Tower Hill, 22 July, 1535, for refusing to acknowledge
Henry VIII as Supreme Head of the Church in England. His headless
body was buried without ceremony "in the churchyerd of Barkyne by the
northe dore"; a few days later Sir Thomas More was beheaded for the same
offence. "Then was tane up the byshoppe agayne and both of them burryd
within the tower." (fn. 1)
The chronicler who thus recorded these events continued: "that
same yere beganne the new testament in Englych." The reading of the Bible
in the vernacular, and dependence upon the Bible as a supreme source of
theological truth, were essential parts of the Reformation in the English church
as laid down by Henry VIII in 1536; yet William Tyndale, whose translation of the Bible has formed the basis of subsequent English versions, was
in that very year an exile for his Zwinglian opinions, and later suffered martyrdom in the Low Countries. In 1537 there was buried in All Hallows churchyard one of Tyndale's former patrons, Alderman Humphrey Monmouth,
who had taken a "fantasy" to the young scholar, but in 1528, finding himself in the Tower on suspicion of bringing heretical books from overseas,
had asked whether he were to blame, if the chaplains and scholars whom he
aided "turned as this priest had done." Monmouth was a draper trading
overseas in Suffolk cloths, and had spread some of Tyndale's works, giving
one to the abbess of Denny, getting another for a Greenwich friar, and
"having no thought that they were not good," until the bishop of London
preached at St. Paul's Cross and said that Tyndale had translated the New
Testament "naughtily." (fn. 2) Monmouth's will, (fn. 3) however, proves his continued
adherence to the reformers. He ordained that his burial should be without
the ringing of bells or singing of dirges, and appointed as his executor Dr.
Robert Barnes, who had been in exile for spreading the New Testament in
England, until Thomas Cromwell had recalled him to support the doctrine
of the royal supremacy. "Four godly ministers, Mr. Latimer, Dr. Barnes,
Dr. Crome and Mr. Taylor" were to preach in Barking church four sermons
a week till thirty sermons should be preached, in memory of Monmouth—
instead of the former custom of providing thirty masses for the soul. The
parishioners of All Hallows thus heard the reformed doctrines from some of
their most notable exponents.

Monmouth
There is little record of the reception of the new opinions in the
parish. In one or two earlier wills there are traces of reaction against extravagances, which had grown up around the doctrine of purgatory. For instance, Thomas Gilbert, a draper and merchant of the Staple of Calais,
had in 1484 desired to be buried in the church and that his obit and mass
should "not be done outrageously contrary to all reason for pomp and pride
of this world . . . but to the laude and praysing of almightie god and to the
helthe and comforte of my soule." (fn. 4) Whether from conviction, or from fear
of the royal authority, the parishioners of All Hallows certainly ceased from
about 1539 onwards to make in their wills those provisions for masses and
prayers for the soul which accompany practically all their earlier bequests.
The King's power was impressed upon them in 1546, when Henry, then on
his deathbed, secured the execution of the soldier-poet, Earl of Surrey,
whose kinship to the royal house threatened the royal plans for the succession.
Surrey was beheaded on Tower Hill on the 19th of January, 1547, and
his body rested in All Hallows churchyard until it was removed to his
ancestral home at Framlingham in 1614. (fn. 5)
With the death of Henry VIII came the triumph of the more advanced
party of the Reformation, who were responsible for sweeping away the
chantries, images and other "superstitious" ornaments and uses. It has
been seen how the royal chapel in the churchyard perished in 1547. A
like fate fell upon the chantries within the church. Then were ousted the
two chantry priests, John Rudde, a man of good learning who was drawing
a salary of £27 odd from the lands of Thomas Pilkes, for whose soul he
celebrated, and John Batman, a priest who sang for the soul of John Croke
in the chapel of St. Nicholas, at a yearly wage of £7; and the yearly obits
for Croke and for William Kyrfote came to an end. The royal commissioners not only seized the whole of these endowments, including those profits which went to the poor, but also the tenement in Seething Lane which
Isabel Hurar had given in 1348 (fn. 6) to the fabric of the church, and the parish
houses also in Seething Lane, which had come to the church from an unknown
donor. (fn. 7)
The Vicar, William Dawes, presented in 1542, was left to carry on
his work single-handed in a parish which was one of the very few city parishes
numbering as many as 800 "houseling" people (i.e. communicants).
He continued here through the various changes of the following years until
his death in 1565, taking for his services £132 odd a year, and serving also
the livings of Woodham Walter and Rivenhall in Essex. Thomas Pilkes'
tenement, which was in Tower Street next the house and garden of his
priest, John Rudd, had been let to one Nicholas Michell, a citizen and
beerbrewer, for 66 years from 1st October, 1546, on which day Michell
had also obtained a ninety-nine years' lease of the thirteen other tenements
belonging to Pilkes' chantry and lying "upon the highway to the Towre
Watergate." In May 1548, backed by John Yelde, a citizen and woodmonger, Michell bought all this property outright at eighteen years' purchase.
An important part of the endowment of John Croke's chantry, viz. the great
house in Mark Lane, which was occupied by William Denham on a fiftythree years' lease dating from 1541, together with two adjacent tenements
and "shops cellars solars vaults and warehouses," was bought by Thomas
Mildmay of Moulsham in Essex at fifteen years' purchase. The tenement
called the "Sopehouse" in the parish, which was parish property, was sold
at fourteen years' purchase to Thomas Reve and George Cotton in 1552. (fn. 8)
Nicholas Michell, the brewer, was apparently an active supporter
of the Edwardian church policy, and as churchwarden with John Hancockes
in 1547 sold the church plate, which has been described above, (fn. 9) for £77
odd, a sum as great as any made in that year by similar sales in London,
expending £37 out of the proceeds "about the reparations of the church."
Just before these changes, in 1546 there died William Thynne, who had
been Master of the Household to Henry VIII, and in editing the works of
Geoffrey Chaucer had included certain spurious tales attacking the medieval
church. The brass to Thynne lies in the south-east aisle of the church, and
both the terms of its inscription and the preamble to his will (fn. 10) breathe the
new spirit of the Reformation.

Thynne
The church records contain no indication of the effects of the Marian
policy here. Philip Dennys, whose arms in brass remain upon the east
wall of the north aisle, was buried in the church with something of the
old ceremony in 1556. "The vj day of September was bered at Barking
church in London master Phelype Dennys sqwyre, with cote [armour . . .]
of armes, and ij whytt branchys and xij torchys, [iiij] grett tapurs, a ij dosen
of skchochyons of armes; the wyche he was a goodly man of armes and
[a great] juster." (fn. 11) The pluralist vicar, William Dawes, was then aided at
All Hallows by a curate, Mr. Daniel, whom Dennys styled his "Ghostly
Father." Of the Reformers who had preached Monmouth's memorial
sermons in the church, Dr. Barnes had been burned at Smithfield in
1540, Dr. Crome saved his life, but not his liberty, by recanting in 1555,
Bishop Latimer suffered martyrdom at Oxford that year and Bishop
Taylor had forfeited his bishopric. And again the parishioners were
eye-witnesses of the calamities which befell those who opposed Tudor
authority. Lord Thomas Grey, whom ambition rather than any religious
motive had involved in the rebellion of Sir Thomas Wyatt, was on 28th
April, 1554, "heddyd on Towre hyll, betwyn IX and X of the cloke a-for
none . . . and bered at Allalow's Barkyng." (fn. 12) In July 1556 Henry Peckham and John Danyell, conspirators who hoped to help seize the Exchequer
and depose Philip and Mary in favour of Elizabeth, were hanged on the
gallows on Tower Hill and afterwards beheaded, and their heads set upon
London Bridge; but their bodies were buried in All Hallows church. (fn. 13)
It is possible that the injunctions of the Edwardian reformers had
not been completely executed in the church, for the rood still remained in
1558, unless it had been restored during the reign of Mary. Apparently
the five altars of St. Nicholas, Our Lady and St. Thomas, the Trinity, St.
Anne and St. Stephen had been destroyed by the Edwardian reformers, and
under Queen Mary two side altars only had been replaced.
Immediately after Elizabeth's accession, the rood was taken down,
the side altars removed and the high altar replaced by a communion
table. The churchwardens' account for 1559 (fn. 14) records these changes as
follows:
|
| Receipts]. Item solde the beame of the Roodelofte at 4d. the
fote, 12 fote and a half a mounting to the some of | 4s. | 2d. |
| Item solde 5 smale peces of tymber that laye at the steppes
of the alter at 3½d the foote mounting to 9 fote and a half some is | 2s. | 10d. |
| Item solde the 2 syde alter stones to Mr Fyssher | 10s. | |
| Item solde the stone of the highe alter to Thomas Garret
and Nicholas Awgoure for | 6s. | 8d. |
| [Paid]. | | |
| Item to a Carpenter for takinge downe of the Crucyfix, the
Marye and John and alhallowes the patrone | | 20d. |
| To a workman for 3 daies worke for takinge down the alters | 3s. | 6d. |
| To 4 laborers for 3 daies worke at 10d. the daie | 10s. | |
| For the carying a waie of 6 lodes of rubbyshe | 3s. | |
| For a workeman to poole downe the Beame in the Rowdelofte
and other thinges that was to do in the churche for twoo daies | 2s. | 4d. |
| For wasshinge the churche walles where the alters stode and
2 dosens of Spanish white at 8d. the dossen | | 16d. |
| This same account includes, also, the payments for setting up the
Communion Table and buying the new service books. | | |
| [Payments] | | |
| Item for a Communion booke | 2s. | 8d. |
| Item for a Communion table | 11s. | 2d. |
| Item for a Service booke | 5s. | 4d. |
| Item for the booke of Iniunctions and articles | | 4d. |
| Item for putting upp the bill of articles | | 4d. |
| Item for other chardges at dynner at the putting in the said
bill of articles | 4s. | |
| Item for the booke called the Homilie | | 16d. |
In the year ending with Lady Day, 1574, the churchwardens bought
the second "tome" of the Homilies and also the Homilies against rebellion
for 2s. This account shows us that both morning and evening prayer were
read by candle-light, and that the vicar, Richard Tyrwhit, who had succeeded
William Dawes in 1565, was aided by a curate, Mr. Phillips. The churchwardens allowed Mr. Phillips 6s. 8d. a quarter for reading morning
prayer. A hassock is also provided that year for the "lower pulpit." In
1580 the curate was receiving yearly 26s. 8d. Four new prayer-books were
bought for the church in that year, and considerable sums were expended
upon the making of the churchyard wall, repairs to the church doors and the
paving of the "lane." The curate then was probably John Tailor, who had
made answer to the visitation articles of Bishop Aylmer in 1579, reporting
that divine service was said and the sacraments administered according to the
Book of Common Prayer, except that the minister did not dip nor use the
sign of the cross in baptism. He did not intermeddle in affairs of state in
preaching, nor did any unlicensed persons preach in the parish. No private
fasts were kept, and so far as was known no conventicles existed in the
parish, nor did any vagrant ministers dwell there without sufficient livelihood.
Thus we gather, that the reply to Aylmer's inquiries as to complete acceptance
of the Elizabethan settlement in this parish was that all was well, save in
regard to the forms of baptism. (fn. 15)
The vicar, Richard Tyrwhit, died in 1585 and Archbishop Whitgift
presented a chaplain of his own, Richard Wood, who aided Whitgift by his
answers to the Marprelate Tracts and resigned about 1591. He was succeeded by Thomas Ravis, also a zealous conformist, who afterwards became
Bishop of Gloucester and of London. In 1604 he was appointed to translate
a part of the New Testament for the Authorised Version of the Bible, a
work with which All Hallows church had an honourable and close connection,
for Dr. Robert Tighe, who was vicar of All Hallows from 1598 until 1616,
was also employed in this translation, by reason of his excellence as a textuary
and linguist. More notable still is the birth in the parish of the learned
Bishop Lancelot Andrewes, whose name stands first upon the list
of translators.
During Elizabeth's reign the church received into its keeping men
of diverse shades of opinion. Here was buried in 1560 William Armar,
citizen and clothworker, who had succeeded in retaining office in the royal
household through the reigns of Henry, Edward, Mary and Elizabeth, and
whose brass with the motto "Lyve to Dye is ye Way to Life" remains upon
a pillar in the south aisle. Here also was buried in 1583 an Italian parishioner, Hieronimus Benalius, (fn. 16) known to be a Papist, whose elaborate monument stands in the north aisle, and who ordained a mass to be said for
his soul at his native town of Bergamo. It is to Elizabeth's reign also that
may be ascribed the late brass to Roger James, brewer, who was buried in
the chancel in 1591.
14.—Parish Government
During the changes in ecclesiastical doctrine and authority there
were simultaneous developments in the form and extent of the parish government in regard to secular affairs. The "masters" of the parish who had
bargained with the organ maker for his services in 1519 crystallised into a
select vestry of thirty members, whose earliest minutes in 1629 claim that
they had existed from time immemorial and who chose the churchwardens,
appointed all other parish officers, assessed the church, and poor, rates and
administered the church charities.
The earliest poor-rate (fn. 17) which exists for the parish dates from 1560
and shows the parishioners paying small sums ranging from 2d. to 12d.
monthly, the vicar, however, paying 20d. quarterly, and eighteen persons
receiving poor relief, while 51s. 10d. was paid that year to Christ's Hospital
towards the relief of the poor harboured there. Thirteen vestrymen signed
the assessment "coleckt in Vestery May the 23, 1562," some of them using
their merchant-marks, thus Mr. Smyth expressed his agreement with a fine
sketch of a tub. (fn. 18) The poor parishioners who received relief were known as
pensioners, and the church papers include petitions addressed to the Masters,
Churchwardens and parishioners by the aged who for many years had paid
taxes, assesses and all church duties there and had fallen upon evil days. (fn. 19)
Much was expected of the parish even to the finding of suitable
houses for the poor. So Faith Bland, a poor widow "destitut of a dwellinghouse" begged the churchwardens and assistants for the lease of one of the
parish houses promising any rent that "in your grave wisdomes shall seeme
meet in Consciens." (fn. 20) The condition of poor households in the parish was
as scandalous in All Hallows parish as elsewhere in Elizabethan London.
In 1579, whilst the curate and churchwardens were seeing to it that the
parish had no unorthodox conventicles nor vagrant priests, the constable
was making inquiry into sanitary conditions and, after stating with some
pride that every house had a chimney, he had to admit that for 57 households,
containing in all 85 people, in Tower Street, St. Katherine's Rents and the
neighbouring alleys, there were in all only three privies. (fn. 21) This same report
concerned itself also with "inmates" or lodgers, a constant source of trouble
to the authorities under the Elizabethan poor law. To protect themselves
from future responsibility the churchwardens would take securities from two
men of property before allowing a stranger's child to be baptised in the church.
So in 1602, two citizens, one a clothworker, the other a fruiterer, gave their
bond in £40 to the churchwardens, that the parishioners should have no
"costes charges troubles or expences whatsoever" by reason of the "mayden
childe of Katheryne the wife of Tirlowe Bryan now resident . . . in the
house of Richard Harmon . . . in Beare Yeard," which child the father
Thurlow Bryan had recently made suit to the churchwardens to have baptised
in the church (fn. 22) . The expectant mother who was homeless was an even
greater trouble to the parish, and the vestry did not scruple to pay her 6d.
or 12d. to move on a little farther into the adjacent parish of St. Dunstan's.
St. Dunstan's was also called upon in 1643 to contribute towards the relief
of many poor in All Hallows parish. The orphans and poor foundlings
were given a name by the upper churchwarden, who would often choose to
call them "Towers," "Thomas Barkin," "Charles Parish" or "Mark
Lane," and sometimes appointed "any beggar" and the grave-digger to
stand as godparents in return for a pot of ale. The child was then brought
up at the parish expense and as early as possible apprenticed to some master,
who would agree to keep him in meat, drink, lodging, apparel and other
necessaries, according to the custom of the City of London, and even in
exceptional cases to make him free of the city company to which the master
himself belonged. (fn. 23)
It was doubtless owing to these duties of the parish authorities that
the church has come to possess several private inventories. For instance,
it has the account of the household stuff of William Tyldesley which was
valued in 1602, and included things of worth such as a "standing bedsted
with greie vallance and Curtens," painted cloths in the chamber, and much
child-linen, but also numbered several articles lent out to pawn, viz., a half
kirtle and a "weding smock" with other things worth 12s., and a petticoat
which had been redeemed from goodwife Hewett for 10s. The later church
records also include a later redeemed pawn ticket for three shifts, a shirt and
a sheet. (fn. 24)
The sudden and extensive fatalities from the plague, which were
particularly numerous in the parish in 1563, 1593, 1625 and 1665, added to
these responsibilities; but there is no obvious reason why the parish chest
of All Hallows should include the inventory of the goods of William Giles,
vicar of Aylesford in Kent, who with his wife and six children died of the
"sickness" in 1593. The account shows his extreme poverty. His goods
(excluding any beds, which presumably were alone considered to be infected) were worth £13 odd; his debts were assessed at £23 odd. His
administrators had paid a poor woman to tend him, his wife and children 12d.
a week for 21 weeks, and three others (two of whom seem to have died)
for five weeks' attendance on the orphaned children till they died. (fn. 25)
There is evidence that the Easter offering in 1559 was devoted in
part to the poor, for the churchwarden then accounted for 16s. 10d. "received
for the paschall towardes the relief of the poore"; (fn. 26) but a regular collection
was not made to supplement the poor rate until the Commonwealth period, (fn. 27)
from which time it appears that the churchwardens and sidesmen stood at
the doors and cried "pray remember the poor." The old custom of paying
poor men to bear torches or say prayers at funerals survived also in the
distribution of money at funerals or marriages which was common in the
17th century.
15.—Laudian All Hallows (fn. 28)
During the first half of the 17th century there was a definite
movement towards beautifying and restoring the church. In 1613, Mr.
John Burnell replaced the communion table, which had been bought cheap
in 1559, with an oak table, doubtless given in memory of his young wife
who had died in childbed in 1612. At the same time the parish set up pews
and the present pulpit of oak; but the sounding board was too small, and
was replaced by the present "pulpitt hedd" made by Mr. Laine in 1638.
In 1616 died the learned vicar, Dr. Robert Tighe, and Archbishop
Abbott presented to the living a kinsman of his own, Edward Abbott, whose
last years were spent in zealous exhortations and earnest work for the "reedifying, repaving and beautifying" of the church. In 1626, a silver
flagon, weighing 42 oz. 12 dwt. (still in use), was given by Margery Covell,
the widow of Francis Covell, citizen and skinner, whose monument remains
on the south side of the church. In 1631, Thomas Crathorne gave a silvergilt cup and cover, and in 1633 Mr. Grimwade added a silver basin. In
1633 the parishioners sold the old plate and pewter, including a silver trencher
weighing 6 oz., and the old silver-gilt chalice weighing 19 oz. They thus
raised a little more than £7. Then they purchased from Walter Shute, the
silversmith, (the present) silver-gilt chalice inscribed "All Hallowes Barking"
and weighing 24 oz. 5 dwt. with a cover weighing between eight and nine
ounces, and also a silver plate for the communion bread, the present
square paten on 4 round knobs, which is said to be unique; they bought
also three new pewter flagons, and a new plate "to set the silver flagons on."
These included the new flagon given by Edmund Forster that same year.
At the same time, in accordance with a resolution in 1633, a restoration of the building itself began in April 1634. Money was raised by voluntary subscriptions and by gifts from the city companies, the farmers of the
Customs and others. About £1400 was expended on these repairs, Mr.
Goodwin "the mathematician" being called in as architect.
On Christmas Day, 1634, at the reopening of the church, Edward
Abbott preached his "last sweet and swan-like sermon," before his death in
March 1635. Thereupon, Archbishop Laud presented to the vicarage
a nephew of his own, Edward Layfield, who succeeded in paying off the whole
debt for the recent reconstruction of the church. Layfield's compliance
with Laud's instructions brought him into conflict with the more Puritanical
among his parishioners. In 1638, the Vestry agreed that the "communion
Table shd. be sett up to the upper end of the chancell, and that the table shd.
be raised one stepp according to order," and paid £52 towards the charges.
A hood of black taffety and ten ells of holland for the vicar's surplice were
also supplied this year. Next year the Vestry accepted a gift towards a new
font from a private donor, and authorised the sale of the old armour (twelve
old corselets and head-pieces) to supplement its purchase. This is the existing
marble font, the cover of which was a later gift. The Puritans among the
parishioners complained to the Bishop of London and to Parliament of these
innovations, stating that Dr. Layfield had set the table altar-wise against the
east wall of the church, had adorned the chancel with ten statues of saints
to which he bowed on going to the altar, had placed a cross over the font and
set up the letters I.H.S. in forty places within the church and had refused
the sacrament to those who had tried to remove these things by force; for
it appears from a later petition that the "little wooden angels" (apparently
identical with some of the ten "saints" recited above) were sawn down from
the corner of the rail before the communion table.
In December 1640 Laud was impeached of treason and imprisoned
in the Tower; it was the turn of the Puritans to have the support of authority.
They petitioned in 1642 for a lecturer to be "allowed the pulpit" on Sunday
afternoons and Thursday evenings. The House of Commons ordered Dr.
Layfield and his curate to permit certain learned orthodox divines (not
necessarily in orders) to preach before the parishioners, so that they might
choose a lecturer. On 1st December, 1642, the Puritan parishioners announced to the Commons their choice of Mr. George Cockayne. It follows
almost without saying that Dr. Layfield was almost immediately (3rd Feb.,
1643) deprived as a delinquent and pronounced incapable of any preferment
in the church; his place was taken by Thomas Clendon, who was appointed
by Parliament and signed the audit as vicar in 1643. Dr. Layfield refused
to obey the order of deprivation without trial. He was dragged from the
church while celebrating divine service, and forced to ride to prison in his
surplice with the Book of Common Prayer tied round his neck. Up to the
last he was trying to obtain preferment, claiming a canonry in St. Paul's in
1642; and he appears to have endeavoured to preserve the cathedral plate,
for in 1654 he was said to have certain plate and goods of St. Paul's concealed in his house. It is said that at one time or another he was imprisoned
in most of the jails about London, in Ely House and in the galleys on the
Thames. (fn. 29)
16.—Puritan All Hallows
The parish, like the rest of the country, was divided into factions, but
for the time being the Puritan Parliamentarians were in power. In January
1645, three of their enemies who were beheaded on Tower Hill were buried
in All Hallows. The register for 1st and 2nd January records the burial of
John Hotham, Esq., and Sir John Hotham, Knt., "beheaded for betraying
[their] trust to the State," since both had held command in the Parliamentarian
forces at Hull, and had plotted their betrayal. On 11th January, Archbishop
Laud himself was "decently interred" in a vault beneath the Communion
Table of All Hallows with the rites of the Church of England, although
these had been abandoned in most of the London churches. He had been
beheaded on Tower Hill on the previous day, but the Commons had given
permission for the body to be delivered to his servants. One of these was his
faithful steward George Snayth, who was buried in the north aisle in 1651.
In 1663 Laud's remains were removed to St. John's College, Oxford, in
conformity with his wishes. Meantime there had been buried in the chancel
near him, the lawyer and soldier, Colonel Eusebius Andrews, who was
executed as a Royalist on Tower Hill, 22nd August, 1650. His declaration
of faith upon the scaffold shows that he was a close follower of Laud. (fn. 30)
The reign of utilitarianism was then in full swing. A "decent
basin" for baptisms was bought for All Hallows church in 1645; but Dr.
Layfield's "large font of marble stone" was soon restored to the church,
for it stood in the middle aisle in 1659. The church became a centre of civil
life; Benjamin Shepherd, appointed registrar in 1653, recorded (somewhat
unsatisfactorily) births and deaths and the civil marriages performed before
Justices of the Peace. The churchyard corner in Tower Street was chosen
as a site for the new stocks and whipping-post in 1657. The pews behind
the north door were removed in 1645 to make an engine house for Tower
Ward. This part of the church long remained a fire-station for the neighbourhood. In the "engine room" in 1659 there stood "one engine marked
abh with a brass pipe and materials belonging"; while along the north aisle
were ranged twenty-four buckets marked "a.b. 1659."
The inventories of the church goods during the Commonwealth
show us something of the interior of the church at that time. The communion table had again been moved table-wise and three "forms with
backs" were set in the chancel, while another stood under a "turning desk,"
to which were chained the church books, Fox's Book of Martyrs, the works
of Dr. Joseph Hall and those of William Perkins, afterwards relegated
to the Vestry. One great Bible was left; but the three books of the service
according to the Church of England had been "taken by Alderman
Andrews." The communion table in 1647 had a new "carpet," or cover,
of purple stuff, but the greatest efforts had been made to adorn the pulpit,
which besides its red velvet cushion had a "new pulpit cloth and cover
. . . with a cushion edged and fringed" of the gift of Mr. Robert Neale.
There were nine other green cushions fringed. Prominent in the chancel
stood the framed Covenant against Papacy and Prelacy. Yet, strangely
enough, the "King's and Prince's" arms remained in the chancel in 1659,
and in 1654 the Vestry had set up in one of the windows the arms of England,
Scotland, Ireland and London. The church was lighted by sixteen candlesticks, "to set on the pews," and the pulpit by candles in "four joints of
brass," possibly each holding four candles, as the inventory of 1634 includes
the "great branch of brass containing 16 lights given by Mr. Fras. Covell
deceased." Candlesticks were supplemented by lanterns, some of glass,
some of horn. Congregations seem to have increased rather than diminished,
even though the parishioners were divided as to matters of church discipline
and doctrine, for a south gallery was added in 1657.
17.—The Explosion and Fire of January, 1649–50
The great parochial event of the Commonwealth was a disaster which
befell both church and parish in 1649–50. Numerous accounts relating to
this event remain among the church records and many details are included in
the Churchwardens' Accounts and Vestry Minutes. At eight o'clock on the
evening of Friday, 4th January, happened "a lamentable and fearful fire in a
ship-chandler's house by gunpowder." The shopkeeper, Robert Porter, had
seven barrels stored in his house in Tower Street for the night, and (fortunately
for the parish) had removed twenty more on board ship. The house and
four other "fair houses," including the Rose Tavern in Tower Street, were
destroyed by the explosion. Ten houses "backward from the street" in
Priests Alley were "quite blowne up." Twenty-six others were rendered
uninhabitable by the explosion or by the fire which followed and continued until the Saturday morning. The "Vickeridge House" was much
shattered. Much damage was done in Chitterling Alley and Beer Lane.
The windows of the church "was wholly all broken and blowne out."
The church tower was dangerously shaken; but this was not discovered
until later.
This "wofull accydent of Powder and Fyer" killed sixty-seven
persons or more; many others were badly burned, or left destitute. The
landlady and the customers at the Rose were killed or injured, as they were
"discoursing on business" at the inn. The landlord was absent and survived. The ship-chandler's family was wiped out. In Priests Alley twentyfour persons were missing.
The care of the destitute and the rebuilding or repair of church and
houses were far beyond the means of the parish. The Keepers of the Liberty
of England (being the Government of the day) by their Letters Patent allowed
collections to be made in all London churches, and the money to be paid
in the Vestry House on Tuesday or Thursday in the following week to nine
trustees of whom one, William Deacon, a citizen and barber-surgeon,
seems to have been particularly active. Two merchants, a gunsmith, a
chandler and two "gentlemen" were also upon this committee which received and dispensed the funds for relieving sufferers "by that great blow."
Their care in keeping the papers relating to this task, has preserved for us
the briefs from more than a hundred city churches, which contributed sums
varying from the nine shillings subscribed by the church of St. Andrew
by the Wardrobe, to a generous gift of £20 8s. 6d. sent from St. Clement's,
East Cheap. By this means £674 odd was collected. The "Honourable
Parliament" voted another £200. Six of the city companies gave £41 odd.
These moneys were assigned to the relief of poor sufferers, each one
receiving so much from the "Turkey Company Guift," so much from the
"Skinners' guift," so much from the "Parliament guift," so much from the
"Letters Pattent money," and so on. The sad tales of many of these pensioners have been preserved. Samuel Porter, a scrivener, had lately settled
in a house next the Rose Tavern, and had just spent £50 or £60 upon it
when it was blown up and the best of all his goods were lost. He was "constrained to betake himself to some Imployment at Sea in ye affaires of the
Navy," and his wife, who earned her living by her needle, was "left with
her three children to the wide world." Widow Pitts, who had nothing but
what she earned by her daily labour, lost goods to the value of £3 4s. Jane
Stephens, who lost her husband and child, was greatly concerned because
by the former's death she lost all hope of much good which they had expected
from a suit at law. Widow Wibourne was aged 100 years, and had lived
in the parish for fifty, when the small goods she had left were impaired
and spoiled by the disaster. William Knight, a plaisterer, who had lived
many years in Chitterling Alley, had his house "utterly ruinated" by "that
fatall blowe of gunpowder." Eleanor and Jacob Jezard received £12 10s.
towards the loss of £231 odd, which they estimated as the value of their
coals and beer, a "Blake Chamlet gowne last with a bone Last," a "blake
Tammell gowne Last with 3 Lasses in a seme," a cloth suit with silver buttons,
"a Blewe petticote and Schie Coller wascote," plate, pewter, 18 pairs of sheets,
pewter brass candlesticks, "Leage horbe boles and other Constante novell
waire," three fair looking-glasses and much else. These were of the wealthier
sort who suffered. George Robert kept a shop and lost small things blown
out of it, and canes "which cost him out of his owne purse at the first peney"
£8, besides five gross of ink-horns and two dozen hour-glasses. Henry Thurgood, another shopkeeper, lost two dozen of "knottes and Roses," a dozen of
"whited brown thredd" and a dozen of "black and brown." A poor
chandler, Richard Prise, not only lost his butter, cheese, soap and candles, but
was the worse by divers folk among his debtors who were burnt to death. Presumably Goody (Mary) Fillett, who lived in Priests Alley, also kept a shop,
for it is not conceivable that the 24 shirts and smocks, the 11 green and white
aprons, the 4 gowns, 14 petticoats and 8 waistcoats, which were destroyed
in her house, were all for her own wearing, though the three Bibles and other
books for which she sent in a claim may have been a fair allowance for one
family. Agnes Hebson, who kept a kind of maternity home, keeping women
in childbed for her maintenance, lost her livelihood by the destruction of
her house in Beer Lane. Finally, Walter Wormewell, the landlord of the
Rose Tavern, "their sad and discontented neighbour," petitioned the trustees
to pay for the cure of his man; but some distrust must have been aroused
by the chirurgeon's willingness to reduce his bill from £20 to £6, and Wormewell's discontent was not decreased by any allowance.
The parishioners themselves subscribed £110 for the "reperation
of the Church much defaced by the blowe of Gunpowder." Throughout the
spring bricklayers, carpenters, plaisterers, plumbers and labourers were at
work, clearing the streets and the churchyard of rubbish, putting in 702
feet of glass on the north side of the church, mending the church door,
altering pews and setting up rails on the north side of the church, making
new leather buckets and repairing the old ones as a precaution against future
fires, setting up the churchyard wall, and rebuilding the Vicarage. The
opportunity was taken to cleanse the King's arms and the Prince's arms,
the Lord's Prayer, Commandments and Belief. A new wall was built at
the west end on the south side of the church. The parish tenements, mostly
in Priests Alley, were repaired, and much was expended on quarrels of glass
and on lead for the casements of the Audit House and other lesser buildings
in the parish. For many years the surviving parishioners kept the fourth of
January as a day of thanksgiving for their deliverance, collected "thanksgiving" money for the poor, and came together to hear a special sermon.
One bitter memory of the disaster lasted for several years in the
acrimonious charges brought by the midwife Hester Shaw against the
minister. Among the throngs who on the day following the explosion
crowded Thomas Clendon's house in Tower Street, clamouring for their
goods which had been brought in thither for safety, were messengers from
Mistress Shaw, who came away discontented, feeling that Master Clendon
had treated them with anger where they had sought sympathy. The distracted minister hesitated in handing over Mistress Shaw's bags of money,
and apparently felt uncertain about the ownership of a certain "silver salt"
which proved to be hers. Mistress Shaw frequented many prayer-meetings
"in the way of her calling," and in spite of counsel from worthy and notable
Puritan divines such as Master Calamy and Master Blackwell, she persisted
in repeating her tale that the minister had kept back two bags of money and
certain gold rolled in a quilt, and that his daughter had taken one of her
new green aprons. Master Clendon attempted to clear himself by an oath
taken before the Lord Mayor in 1653, and by publishing an apologia prefixed
to a sermon upon "Justification Justified." This sermon had been preached
in St. Gregory's church in 1652, and was itself too moderate to please the
stricter and more "orthodox" divines. Mistress Shaw answered with
"Innocency Restored," publishing sworn depositions in her support. Thus
the parties tried out in the press a slander case, which under ordinary circumstances would have been heard in the ecclesiastical courts. (fn. 31)
In 1658, it became apparent that the church tower had been so
greatly damaged by the explosion that it must either be rebuilt or repaired
"for great danger [was] otherwise likely to ensue." In April of that year
the Vestry decided to rebuild, accepting the plans of Samuel Twin, bricklayer.
Five surveyors examined the old steeple that year; but work did not begin
until March 1659, when the bells were taken down. George Lee, probably
one of the workmen, was killed by a fall from the steeple, which was then
being taken down by Mr. Brathwell. During this year the present brick
tower was erected at the end of the nave, the "ould Saintes Bell" was replaced by a new one in the turret, the old peal of five bells was increased to
six, and the old clock was replaced by a new one, flanked within the church
by two figures of fretwork on each side the dial. Over £200 in voluntary
gifts were collected towards this work; but its cost was considerably more,
and the debt was only paid off after Dr. Layfield's return to the vicarage.
18.—The Later Growth of the Church and Parish
Dr. Layfield returned to his old parish shortly after the King came
into his own again. His friends among the parishioners greeted him with
a festive dinner on 20th October, 1662, and Thomas Clendon, who had
supplanted him, retired to the small Essex living of Radminster, where he
died.
In 1662 the vicar was once more provided with surplice and hood.
But there remained a strong Puritan element among the Vestrymen, and his
express wish that the communion table should be replaced altarwise at the
east end of the church was only complied with in December 1662, upon an
injunction from the Bishop. These were signs of the time. In 1663, the
strict Puritans among the Vestrymen were faced with the need for resigning
office unless they signed the Declaration of the Act of Uniformity, entailing
not only acceptance of the revised Book of Common Prayer, but also renunciation of that Solemn League and Covenant which they had set in so proud
a place in the chancel. Fifteen out of the thirty vestrymen declined to sign
and may possibly have formed a nucleus for that conventicle of over forty
persons, which met in David Austin's house in Tower Hamlet in 1686. (fn. 32)
The resignation of just half the vestrymen as a result of the Fourth Act of
Uniformity bears out the general impression, obtained from the details of
the previous years, that the parishioners were about equally divided between
zealous conformity and extreme Puritanism. The remaining fifteen vestrymen proceeded to choose others to bring their number up to thirty. They were
faced with a great debt for the recent rebuilding of the church tower, and
by difficulties in gathering the money in a divided parish. On Sunday,
23rd April, 1665, after evening prayers the greatest part of the substantial
housekeepers with the Doctor [Layfield], churchwardens, and vestrymen
appointed twelve persons to assess a rate towards discharging the debt.
The churchwarden who ventured to demand the rate on Sir Richard Ford's
house in Seething Lane spent an unhappy night in prison, although counsel's
opinion was obtained that in the event of refusal the parish might distrain
or take action in Court Christian or in the Lord Mayor's court. (fn. 33) Ford,
however, who had been knighted for taking part in the city's address to
Charles II at the Hague in 1660, was probably too powerful an opponent
for this poor churchwarden.
The Great Fire, which began near London Bridge on the night of
Saturday, 1st September, 1660, came roaring along Tower Street on the
following Tuesday, "coming on in that narrow streete, on both sides, with
infinite fury." By the end of the day it had destroyed the Dolphin Tavern,
part of the church property; (fn. 34) but about here the blowing up of houses with
gunpowder, and the help given by workmen from the King's Yards checked
its progress. It was thus due to Sir William Penn, the distinguished admiral
then in residence at the Navy Office, that All Hallows was saved from the
fire, "it having burned the dyall of Barking Church, and part of the porch,
and was there quenched." This was by the Wednesday, when Samuel
Pepys went "up to the top of Barking steeple" . . . and thence watched
the "great fires, oyle-cellars and brimstone and other things burning"
until he "became afeared to stay there long and down again as fast as I
could." (fn. 35) The church, indeed, had a very narrow escape, and the vicarage
which stood against its south-west corner in Tower Street was destroyed,
and was subsequently rebuilt by Dr. Layfield.
Pepys and Penn were not themselves parishioners of All Hallows,
as they both lived at the Navy Office at the top of Seething Lane in St. Olave's
parish. William Penn, the admiral's son and founder of Pennsylvania, had,
however, been baptized at All Hallows in 1644. Pepys attended All
Hallows only on special occasions. For instance, on 9th October, 1664,
when the "wit of Cambridge," Mr. Fuller, preached "well and neatly"
a sermon which must have had brevity as well as wit, for the Diarist was out
in time for service at St. Olave's, and so was able to follow home from there
"one of the prettiest women he ever saw." Pepys did not even attend the
funeral of his "Morena," the "pretty black girl" Elizabeth Dekins, but
listened in bed to the bells of All Hallows tolling for her burial on the night
of 22nd October, 1662. (fn. 36) In 1667, Sarah Neesham was here married in a
fit of generous gratitude by George Jeffreys, then a young lawyer, and destined to gain notoriety as a brutal judge and Lord Chancellor.
Towards the end of Charles II's reign, steps were taken to make the
church and its services more beautiful. In 1675, Renatus Harris was
employed to install an organ in the West Gallery, the old organ having probably disappeared during the Commonwealth. In the alterations which
ensued the clock dial with its fretwork figures of Time and Death were moved
into the church, and the figure which had stood between Time and Death
was moved by the churchwarden (Mr. Clements) to the east end, where it
was set up over the commandments. This was "a Great, Carved, Guilded
Image, and about a yard and a half long, with great, broad, spreading wings,
. . . the right Arm and Hand holding a Trumpet near to its mouth, the left
. . . holding . . . a Label of Lead . . . on the Label Arise you dead,
and come to judgment." Shortly afterwards one of the parishioners gave the
church a rich "carpet" or frontal embroidered with a Glory and the letters
I.H.S. About the same time, the lecturer, Mr. Jonathan Saunders, began
to introduce more ceremony into his conduct of the services. These things
gave offence to many coming as they did at a time when the popular mind,
stirred to anti-Romanism by the intrigues of Titus Oates, converted all forms
and ceremonies into Papistry. Presentments were made at the Old Bailey
against this image "of St. Michael," and in 1681, the senior churchwarden,
Edmund Sherman, having been indicted with others for allowing it to remain
in the church, gave serious offence by his arbitrary actions, firstly by carrying
off the image to the trial, secondly by pleading guilty contrary to the vicar's
advice, and thirdly by making firewood of the figure for the vestry meetings.
Meantime, the vicar, Dr. Hickes, had bound himself to traverse an indictment in the same matter at the sessions following; and the indictment was
then quashed on the ground that offences violating the Edwardian Statute
against images could not be tried save by Justices of Assize or of the Peace.
The lecturer took up cudgels on behalf of the burned image, publishing two
pamphlets on the "Apparitions" at Barking. Sherman's disrespect for the
lecturer seems to have been compounded of a real disapproval of his novel
ceremoniousness, and of jovial contempt for a neighbour with whom he had
been "very merry at Tavern dinner last Election-day secundum usum Barkin."
He answered the "Apparitions" in two clever but scurrilous pamphlets on
"The Birth and Burning of St. Michael," and so the matter came to rest. (fn. 37)
The parishioners as a whole were evidently disinclined to support
Sherman, and in 1686, the figure having been destroyed, Mr. John Richardson gave the present altar-piece, of classical design, with its pictures of
Moses and Aaron and with the tables of the Commandments and the Lord's
Prayer usual in the city churches rebuilt after the Great Fire. At the
same time a new communion table was given by Major Richard Burdon.
In the midst of the dispute, in 1682, Mr. James Foyle gave the present
font-cover which has been ascribed to Grinling Gibbons, while Mr. George
Crosley supplied the iron branch to support it. The cover cost £12; the
branch £3.
The learned vicar who bore a dignified part in these contentions was
Dr. George Hickes, who had recently been appointed to All Hallows, and
resigned the living in 1686, being then Dean of Worcester. He afterwards
lost all his preferments in 1689 upon refusing the oath of allegiance to William
and Mary and turned physician to earn his daily bread; some years later
he was one of the two Jacobean bishops consecrated at Enfield in order to
continue the episcopal succession among non-jurors. Even before his appointment to All Hallows he had been connected with the neighbourhood, for
in 1668 he had come courting a Mrs. Howell at the Navy Office and had
preached at St. Olave's, Hart Street, a sermon which Samuel Pepys found
"but dull." (fn. 38)
In 1695, All Hallows gave a resting-place to another famous nonjuror, the devout and learned John Kettlewell, who had been an intimate
friend of George Hickes and was buried in the tomb that had been Arch
bishop Laud's. The burial service was read by Bishop Ken himself, who
(though a non-juror) officiated upon this occasion in episcopal vestments
and prayed for the King and queens [sic]. (fn. 39)
During the last century or so parish life has undergone far-reaching changes. One of the greatest was the dwindling of the Vestry's power.
At All Hallows the old "select" Vestry, whose records date back to 1629,
readily accepted the new order of things, and at a meeting in the church in
1808 opened the election of its members to parishioners at large. It is to
the Vestry's credit that this was done without the litigation which brought
about the same changes elsewhere. The diversity of the church's duties
in former days is reflected in its records. These include, for instance, the
Workhouse Accounts, with a wealth of detailed expenditure upon Godfrey's
cordial, Penny Royal, Juniper Berries and "Miselto," and also the rates for
maintaining firecocks and the fire-engine, which was housed at the church.
Later, in common with all parishes, the Vestry lost its civil duties, particularly
the administration of poor relief, so that to-day its chief function is the choice
of churchwardens.
The medieval "masters" of the parish managed secular and ecclesiastical business together, and never dreamed of severing them, for in their
guilds and in their daily lives religion and trade were inextricably mingled.
The modern Parochial Council, chosen by all enrolled communicants, has
a more democratic constitution; but its business is more strictly limited to
church matters. This is one result of the general tendency to separate religious
from secular business, and this general tendency to segregate spiritual life
has been intensified in city parishes, such as All Hallows, by the gradual
replacement of crowded dwelling-houses by the office and the warehouse.
In 1801 the parishioners numbered 2087; now there are barely 200.
More than once of late times, the large endowment of this important
but sparsely-populated parish has been used for work of wider scope than that
of a parish church. In 1884, All Hallows became the mission church of a
small college of priests which was established in Trinity Square. In 1922,
it became the Guild Church of Toc H, whose common ideals of service and
comradeship are based upon memories of the Great War, and especially upon
the social work then done by Talbot House in Poperinghe. The association
of the church with this movement was confirmed in 1928 by the creation of
an All Hallows Toc H Trust under a joint deed of the Archbishop of
Canterbury, as patron, and the Corporation of Toc H. The Anglican
padres were thereby given a special collegiate connexion, and a Collegiate
House has been re-established (1929), at 42 Trinity Square. The increase
in communicants from 1092 in 1922 to the present-day number of 7382
indicates the modern growth in the spiritual work of the church, which
by means of Toc H is further extended throughout the Empire and
beyond.