Close Rolls, Edward III: December 1363

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 11, 1360-1364. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1909.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward III: December 1363', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 11, 1360-1364, (London, 1909) pp. 503-507. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw3/vol11/pp503-507 [accessed 19 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

December 1363

1363. Membrane 3.
Dec. 3.
Westminster.
To Philip de Lutteleye escheator in Staffordshire, Salop and Gloucestershire. Order to cause Hugh Tyrel, brother and heir of John Tyrel tenant in chief, to have seisin of the lands whereof his said brother at his death was seised in his demesne as of fee, and which by his death are taken into the king's hand; as the said Hugh has proved his age before the escheator, and the king has taken his fealty for the lands of his brother, and has respited his homage until Easter next.
To John de Bekynton escheator in Somerset and Dorset. Like order, as Hugh has proved his age before Philip de Lutteleye escheator in Salop.
The like to John de Evesham escheator in the county of Suthampton.
Dec. 4.
Westminster.
To Henry de Snayth the king's clerk, keeper of the great wardrobe. Order to cause Patrick Byker the king's artillier within the Tower of London, and Stephen atte Merssh his smith therein, to have livery of their gowns for Christmas next as they used heretofore, taking their acquittances.
Nov. 12.
Westminster.
To Richard de Wydeville escheator in Norhamptonshire. Order to remove the king's hand and not to intermeddle further with three messuages, 23 acres of land, 3 acres 1 rood of meadow in Brochole and 2s. of rent in Muscot, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as the king has learned, by certificate of John bishop of Lincoln, that Richard [son] of Eleanor de Brochole, lately indicted for certain felonies before John Moubray and Thomas de Ingelby justices assigned for a gaol delivery at Norhampton, and delivered to John late bishop of Lincoln as a convicted clerk according to the benefit of clergy, died on 4 August in the 36th year of the reign in the prison where he was for that cause detained, and it is found by certificate of the escheator that he took the premises into the king's hand by reason of the said felonies, and they are yet in his hand, that the said Richard died in the said bishop's prison of Bannebury on the day aforesaid without making his compurgation, and that the premises are held of others than the king.
Dec. 2.
Westminster.
To the sheriff of Hertford. Order to cause the messuages and lands called le Haukers in Hertfordshire to be taken again into the king's hand and restored to William de Wychyngham the king's serjeant, to hold as he held them before they were taken into the king's hand; as on 16 February last the king by letters patent gave for good service to John Tristrem his counter-searcher (contrarimator) for life with reversion to the king and his heirs the said messuages and lands, which were of John Botild, and came to the king's hand as an escheat for that the said John Botild, tenant thereof in chief it was said, committed a felony whereof he was convicted; and after at the suit of the said William, alleging that the premises are one messuage, 87 acres of land, 6 acres of meadow, 15 acres of wood and 9s. of rent in Staundon co. Hertford called le Haukers, that they are held of others than the king, that the said William, with William Botild now deceased and Henry Botild chaplain who has released his estate therein to him, acquired the same in fee of the said John Botild and Margaret his wife by the name of one messuage and all other lands and tenements which were of John and Margaret in Staundon, and was thereof seised until put out by the said John Tristrem by virtue of the said letters patent, and praying that the king would order restitution thereof to be made him, as on 5 July in the 34th year the king by letters patent pardoned John Botild the suit of his peace to him pertaining for all trespasses and felonies whereof he was indicted, and any outlawries published against him, and after an outlawry published in error against the said John for trespasses and felonies so pardoned was annulled by process before the king, whereby it was decided that John Botild should have again all his lands, goods and chattels taken into the king's hand, the king ordered the sheriff to warn John Tristrem to be before him in chancery on the quinzaine of Midsummer last to show cause wherefore the premises should not be so restored with the issues from 16 February aforesaid, and further to do and receive what the court should determine; at which day John Tristrem came in person, and the process being continued until the quinzaine of Michaelmas following, he appeared and said he had no cause to shew.
Nov. 20.
Westminster.
To the treasurer and the barons of the exchequer. Order to stay their demand upon Lawrence de Pabenham knight for payment of 126l. 13s. 4d. for the price of certain goods and chattels of Master Andrew de Offord deceased by him occupied it is said, discharging him thereof; as the said Lawrence has shewn the king that though the said Andrew was not outlawed at any time, by negilgence of the writer, his name is inserted in error in a roll sent by the king to the treasurer and barons among the names of other men who on Monday after St. Hilary in the 25th year of the reign were by process before the king outlawed for that they came not before him to answer for contempts and trespasses by them committed, by colour whereof the treasurer and barons are causing the sum aforesaid to be demanded of Lawrence by summons of the exchequer, pretending that the goods and chattels of Andrew are forfeit to the king, and are causing him to be distrained, wherefore he has prayed for remedy; and it is found by certificate of Henry Grene the chief justice, sent into chancery by the king's command, that Andrew was not outlawed on the day named for the cause alleged nor for any other, but his name was inserted by negligence as aforesaid.
Nov. 3.
Westminster.
To William de Reygate escheator in Yorkshire and Cumberland. Order to deliver to William bishop of Winchester, Ralph Spygurnel, John de Bisshopeston and John de Gour, executors of Roger de Mortuo Mari earl of March, a messuage and five bovates of land in Hilderskelf co. York held for life by William Cook deceased, the bailiwick of keeping the park of Kilkamban and the park of Greystok called le Neupark, and the office of master forester of the forest within the barony of Greystok held for life by John Wrenne likewise deceased, all of the heritage of the heir of William baron of Greystok tenant in chief, and taken into the king's hand by the said William Coke and John and by reason of the nonage of the said heir, together with the issues thereof taken since their death, to hold in ward according to the king's letters patent; as on 24 July in the 33rd year of his reign the king committed to the said earl the wardship of all the lands of the said baron, which are in the king's hand by reason of his death and of the nonage of his heir, with the issues thereof taken since his death, and the reversions of lands and tenements held in dower or for life or a term of years of that heritage, until the lawful age of the said heir; and it is found by certificate of the escheator, sent into chancery by the king's command, that William de Nessefeld late escheater delivered to him by indenture the messuage, land, bailiwick and office aforesaid, alleging that they are in the king's hand for the causes above mentioned.
Nov. 10.
Westminster.
To Philip de Lutteleye escheator in Staffordshire. Order not to intermeddle further with the bailiwick of keeping the bishop of Chester's chace of Ryuggeleye, and with the third part of two thirds of the manor of Tomenhorne taken into the king's hand by the death of Anne who was wife of Philip de Lutteleye, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as the king has learned by inquisition, taken by the escheator, that the said Anne at her death held no lands in that county in chief in her demesne as of fee, but held the said bailiwick in fee tail, and the said third part in dower for her life, with reversion to Thomas brother and heir of William son of Thomas de Tomenhorne, and that the same are held of others than the king.
Membrane 2.
Nov. 14.
Westminster.
To Philip de Lutteleye escheator in Herefordshire and the march of Wales adjoining. Order to deliver in dower to Elizabeth who was wife of John de Carreu tenant in chief so many as are in his bailiwick of the knight's fees and parts of fees following which the king has assigned to her, with the assent of Richard de Ravenser the king's clerk, treasurer of Queen Philippa to whom the king has granted the wardship of two thirds of the lands of the said John until the lawful age of his heir, with the knights' fees and advowsons thereto belonging; namely one knight's fee in Laurenny held by John son of Peter Corbet (extended at 100s. a year), two knights' fees in Gumfreston and Wydelok held by John Wydelok (at 10 marks), the moiety of one knight's fee in Marteltwy held by Rees ap Griffith knight and John de Roche (at 100s.), the moiety of one knight's fee in Coytkellas held by John Percevale (at 60s.), one knight's fee in Milton held by William Malfaunt (at 10 marks), one knight's fee in Churcheton and Lantegonet held by John Melyn (at 100s.), one knight's fee in Piscanernawe held by Richard Huscard (at 40s.) all in the said march, and one knight's fee in Coombe Coffyn co. Devon extended at 10 marks at year.
To Thomas Cheyne escheator in Devon. Like order to deliver in dower to the said Elizabeth one knight's fee in Combe Coffyn extended (as above).
To Thomas Cheyne escheator in Devon. Like order to deliver in dower to the said Elizabeth the advowson of Stokflemyng extended at 20l. a year.
Nov. 10.
Westminster.
To John de Tye escheator in Sussex. Order to cause John son and heir of John de Insula of Gatecombe tenant in chief to have seisin of the lands whereof his said father at his death was seised in his demesne as of fee, and which by his death are taken into the king's hand; as the said John the son has proved his age before the escheator, and the king has taken his fealty for the lands of his father, and has respited his homage until Easter next.
To John de Evesham escheator in the county of Suthampton. Like order, as John son of John de Insula has proved his age before John de Tye.
Nov. 27.
Westminster.
To the sheriff of Somerset. Order to remove the king's hand and not to intermeddle further with a moiety of the manor of Haselbere held by Sibyl who was wife of Alan son of Alan Plokenet, restoring to Thomas de la Bere any issues taken of that moiety; as lately upon information received that Alan Plokenet at his death held the said manor, which is held in chief, in his demesne as of fee by grant of King Edward I, and died without an heir, whereby the same ought to pertain to the king as an escheat, the king appointed Ralph de Middelneye, Thomas Cary and Robert de Hadham, three and two of them, to make inquisition touching the premises; and after on the finding of an inquisition, taken before the said Thomas and Robert, that Alan Plokenet held the said manor as aforesaid in chief by knight service, that he was an alien and bastard, that after his death Alan his son entered the same as his true heir of him begotten, and continued his seisin 3½ years, that after his death King Edward II restored a moiety of the said manor to Joan sister and heir of Alan the son, who died without an heir of her body, and with the other moiety dowered the said Sibyl, and so Joan occupied one moiety 3 years and died without an heir of her body, whereby Simon de Bereford late escheator this side Trent in the 5th year of the reign took that moiety into the king's hand, that being deceived by the return of a writ of diem clausit extremum after the death of the said Joan, obtained at the suit of Richard de Bere alleging that he is cousin and heir of Joan, namely that Richard was her cousin and next heir, the king restored to him her moiety, whereof he died seised, and that after his death the king took that moiety into his hand and restored it to Thomas de la Bere son and heir of Richard, and so Richard and Thomas occupied it from the said 5th year, taking the issues and profits, the king by writ ordered the sheriff to warn Thomas to be in chancery in the quinzaine of Easter then next to shew cause wherefore the moiety of the said manor, which he so held, ought not to be taken into the king's hand as an escheat, and wherefore he ought not to answer for the issues from the 5th year; at which day Thomas came, and said that the said Alan was not an alien nor bastard, but born at Thornton co. Dorset, being begotten in lawful matrimony of Andrew de la Bere and Alice his wife sister of Robert Walrand of the English nation, and craved an inquisition of the country hereupon, and Henry de Greystok, who sued for the king, said he was an alien and bastard, and offered so to prove, wherefore a day was given Thomas to be before the king in the quinzaine of Trinity then next to do and receive what should be lawful in the premises; and now it is found by inquisition, taken before the king, that Alan was son of the said Andrew and Alice, ancestors of Thomas whose heir he is, born as aforesaid, wherefore it was decided that Thomas should go without a day, as is found by the record and process which the king has caused to come before him in chancery; wherefore Thomas has petitioned the king for livery of the other moiety of the said manor held in dower by the said Sibyl, which by her death is taken into the king's hand, and the wardship committed to him by letters patent under the seal of the exchequer, to hold for a set yearly farm until debate be had whether the manor ought to pertain to the king or Thomas, praying also his discharge of the farm and issues for the time it was in the king's hand.
Order to the treasurer and the barons of the exchequer to remove the king's hand from the moiety of the said manor, discharging as well the said Thomas as the sheriff, and restoring to Thomas any issues thereof taken to the king's use.
Dec. 12.
Westminster.
To the mayor and bailiffs of the town of Bristol and the collectors of the customs, also to the keepers of the passage in that port. Order to suffer Ellis Spelby of Bristol without let to lade in that port 15 fardels of cloth of the western parts, each fardel containing 20 cloths, and to take them to the parts of Spain and Gascony after paying the customs thereon due, any orders, proclamations or commands to the contrary notwithstanding; as the king has granted the said Ellis to lade and take thither those cloths, which were bought long before the publication of the statute concerning the export of cloth and other merchandise to no foreign parts save the parts of Calais, as the king has learned. By K.
To the same. Like order to suffer Henry de Endebourne of Winchester to lade 15 fardels of cloth in that port and thereof to take 13 to Spain and 2 to Gascony.