Comparison of Lateran Register Numbers

Sponsor

Institute of Historical Research

Publication

Author

J. A. Twemlow (editor)

Year published

1933

Pages

40-41

Annotate

Comment on this article
Double click anywhere on the text to add an annotation in-line

Citation Show another format:

'Comparison of Lateran Register Numbers', Calendar of Papal Registers Relating to Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 12: 1458-1471 (1933), pp. XL-XLI. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=103798 Date accessed: 20 October 2014.


Highlight

(Min 3 characters)

Comparison Between the Number of Items in the Indice of the Lateran Registers of Pius II and the Number in the Present Volume of the Calendar. (fn. 1)

No. of the Register. (fn. 2) No. of items in Indice. No. of items in Calendar.
534A nil nil
535 1 1
536 4 4
537 6 10
538 5 6
539 16 19
540 1 1
541 8 8
542 4 5
543 3 4
544 5 6
545 9 11
546 5 5
547 5 (fn. 3) 7
548 7 (fn. 4) 6
548A 5 10
549 3 8
550 2 3
551 3 3
552 3 6
553 3 5
554 0 3
555 2 5
556 9 12
557 9 9
558 6 (fn. 5) 9
559 6 9
560 (fn. 6) 5 7
560A 0 9
561 (fn. 7) 3 7
562 5 7
563 4 6
564 5 7
565 3 5
566 2 3
567 2 2
568 0 2
569 1 1
570 3 5
571 4 5
572 4 7
573 9 10 (fn. 8)
574 4 5
575 4 5
576 2 5 (fn. 9)
577 1 1
578 3 5
579 4 7
580 0 22
581 3 10
582 0 2
583 4 7
584 2 5
585 4 6
586 1 4
587 2 6
588 4 6
589 2 5
590 4 10
591 3 8 (fn. 10)
592 2 2
593 1 1
594 2 6
595 2 12
596 0 9
597 2 6
597A 5 10 (fn. 11)
598 3 8
599 0 2

Footnotes

1

The Indice totals are based on the single-volume Indice, which, as in the case of the Calixtus Indice, is more complete than the two-volume alphabetical Indice. In the Calendar totals, ‘concurrent’ letters have not been counted separately.

As explained above, p. xi, it is not possible to make a similar comparison for the Lateran Registers of Paul II.

2 The numbers which the Registers bear in the Indice are shown in the Concordance printed above, pp. xvii sqq.
3 One of these, namely, the entry on p. 47, below, is perhaps in the Indice under ‘Traiectensis.’
4 For an item which is attributed by the Indice to this Register, probably by error, since it does not occur in the Calendar, see below, p. 49, note.
5 The entry on p. 86, below, was probably omitted by the Indice because it was incomplete.
6 Here end the Libri or Registers comprised in Vol. I of the Indice. Reg. 560A does not appear to be included in either volume of the alphabetical Indice. See also above, p. viii, note ‡.
7 Here begin the Libri or Registers comprised in Vol. II of the Indice.
8 Two of these are duplicates, below, p. 138.
9 One of these, below, p. 149, is unfinished, and was therefore passed over in the Indice.
10 One of these, below, p. 200, is unfinished, and would probably for that reason be passed over by the compiler of the Indice.
11 One of these, below, p. 220, is a duplicate.