THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IN WITNEY, c. 1800–1900
During the 19th century Witney was transformed by
mechanization, the introduction of the factory system,
and the emergence of large commercial family firms. (fn. 1)
The blanket industry remained dominant, its success in
adapting to new conditions largely accounting for the
town's continued prosperity: in 1851 blanket-workers
still comprised almost 19 per cent of the working population, by far the largest single group, (fn. 2) and in the 1880s
the industry was still called the town's 'staple' trade. (fn. 3)
Difficulties in the 1850s, when the town's population fell
through emigration, (fn. 4) may be partly attributable to the
lack of a railway, which added significantly to transport
costs and, by hindering coal-supply, delayed the adoption of steam power: such disadvantages were cited
frequently by promoters of the Witney railway, (fn. 5) who
soon after its opening in 1861 were credited with having
rescued the town from the 'lethargy' which handicapped
'all localities . . . unconnected by railway communication
with the busy world'. (fn. 6) By the 1880s business was judged
to be sound despite the 'prevalent commercial depression', thanks primarily to the thriving blanket industry;
new industries were being attracted, and visitors 'had
only to walk down the town and note the improvements
in shop fronts . . . to see that business was in a prosperous
state'. (fn. 7)

37. Woodgreen blanket factory (later Henry Early's),
mid 19th century.
By the 1850s almost a fifth of the town's working
population were wage-earning factory workers, but
Witney retained the range of trades, crafts, and industries typical of a small manufacturing and market town.
Retailers, including food and drink suppliers and
publicans, accounted in 1851 for 11 per cent of the
working population, and miscellaneous manufacturers
(including leather and metal-workers) for another 11
per cent, while service trades (including building)
comprised over 7 per cent. A significant agricultural
element also remained: nearly a tenth of the working
population in 1851 were farmers or agricultural
labourers, with another 3 per cent engaged in predominantly agricultural crafts such as smithying or
coopering, and 7 per cent described merely as 'labourers'
in either agriculture or industry. Lawyers, doctors,
churchmen, and those of independent means, important to the town's social life, represented over 5 per cent.
Fourteen per cent, mostly but not all women, were
domestic servants in private houses or inns, and comparable numbers of women supplemented family income as
dress- or bonnet-makers, glovers, or laundresses. (fn. 8)
The Blanket Industry c. 1800–1900
Between 1800 and 1840 Witney's blanket industry was
transformed by the introduction of spring-looms and
mechanized factory-spinning, the largely contemporaneous gathering of hand-loom weavers into factories,
and the consequent replacement of large numbers of
small master-weavers by a few dominant family firms
with sufficient capital. In large part such developments
were a response to potentially catastrophic competition
from Yorkshire with its more advanced industrialization, and although further mechanization in Witney was
delayed until after the railway opened in 1861, by then
the town's surviving manufacturers seem to have largely
fended off the threat and established a modern industry
with secure markets. (fn. 9)
Mechanization before 1800, other than waterpowered fulling and gig-mills outside the town, was
apparently confined to a horse-powered rowing
machine provided by the Blanket Company for its
members in 1782, used for raising the nap after fulling. (fn. 10)
In the early 19th century water-powered spinning was
introduced by tenants of New Mill: Edmund Wright,
killed in an accident at the mill about 1808, acquired
some notoriety among local cloth-workers for his innovations, and following a fire in 1818 John (d. 1862) and
Edward Early (d. 1835) and their brother-in-law Paul
Harris installed new spinning and carding machinery
built by Edmund Ogden of Rochdale (Lancs.). (fn. 11) In the
early 1820s they undertook spinning for other manufacturers, though principally supplying their own operations. (fn. 12) Spinning machinery may have been introduced
to Crawley Mill soon after, (fn. 13) and in the mid 19th century
there was a small horse- or donkey-powered spinning
factory on Corn Street. (fn. 14) Power-looms seem not to have
been introduced until the late 1850s or 1860s, (fn. 15) though
spring-looms, which could be operated by one rather
than two weavers, were introduced around 1800,
reportedly by one of the Earlys, and by the 1830s were
commonplace. (fn. 16)
By then the gathering of weavers into factories was
evidently advanced. John Early's Newland factory, open
from 4 a.m. to 8 p.m. and requiring constant attendance
from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., employed 52 hand-loom weavers,
earning between 7s. and 18s. a week according to age and
experience. Weavers were disciplined for misconduct or
absence by temporary confiscation of their shuttle,
which was considered 'a disgrace' among the men,
although subjection to new conditions was not yet
wholly accepted: Early asserted that weavers were 'not so
good economists of their time as spinners and fullers',
and that they had 'a dislike to be under restriction as to
time . . . and are less under control'. An employee
confirmed that many weavers came 'sauntering in'
partway through the week, and consequently had to
overwork to make up time. Some weavers continued
outside factories, but seem to have become rarer. (fn. 17)
A few family firms with their own factories became
increasingly dominant, a process common elsewhere in
the 1830s, but more often associated with introduction
of power-weaving. (fn. 18) By the 1820s the number of substantial blanket-manufacturers in Witney had fallen from 60
or 70 to a dozen or fewer, mostly members of the Early
and Collier families, together with John Brice, John
Brooks, Thomas Collins, George Hathaway, and James
and William Marriott. (fn. 19) By 1838 there were only eight
principal manufacturers, all Earlys or Colliers, with 'a
few' others 'employing very small numbers'; the largest
employer was John Early (d. 1862), who had 70 weavers
and spinning or fulling machinery at Witney and New
Mills, while most others employed 20–35 weavers, and
Robert Collier only four. (fn. 20) By 1851 John Early employed
144 people, 28 of them children and 16 of them women. (fn. 21)
Smaller firms continued to be taken over: Thomas
Collins's weaving shops and small blanket factory on the
north side of Corn Street, gradually extended from the
late 18th century, were sold on his bankruptcy in 1814
and acquired in 1830 by Horatio and Robert Collier,
themselves in difficulty a few years later, (fn. 22) while premises
belonging to a small manufacturer at West End were
sold in 1847. (fn. 23) Meanwhile the Blanket Company, widely
perceived by the 1810s as an anachronistic hindrance,
declined rapidly. (fn. 24) Membership fell sharply from around
1800, (fn. 25) and though officers were elected until the
Company's official closure in 1847, by the 1830s it had
effectively ceased to function. (fn. 26)
The severe depression of the blanket industry in the
late 18th century at first continued: in 1807 Arthur
Young commented that for many years the decline had
seemed irreversible, attributing incipient recovery
largely to mechanization and to the decline of BlanketCompany regulation. (fn. 27) By the 1810s the threat posed by
Yorkshire factory-owners was fully recognized by
Witney manufacturers seeking contracts: in 1814 John
Early (d. 1862) wrote from London that '[Benjamin]
Gott is here himself and means to tender for the whole of
the woollens . . . it is the general opinion that these Yorkshire blades will do us, and something must be
attempted to prevent the same if possible'. (fn. 28) Small-scale
improvements, notably introduction of foreign wools in
blending, were aimed at making Witney blankets more
competitive, though in the 1830s Witney manufacturers
were still unable to compete on price without massive
reinvestment in new machinery. (fn. 29) Their continued
success seems to have rested in part on existing reputation and contacts, particularly with the Hudson Bay
Company and London dealers, combined with partial
mechanization and vigorous pursuit of new markets. (fn. 30)
Probably equally important was the flexibility enjoyed
by a close-knit group of family firms prepared to cooperate in securing and sharing contracts: thus in 1814
Robert Collier offered to share with the Earlys a large
government order beyond his capacity, a form of cooperation which remained common throughout the 19th
century. (fn. 31) In 1819 the town was reportedly 'full of business', (fn. 32) and although in 1838 Yorkshire competition
remained 'injurious', trade was said to have nearly
doubled in recent decades and remained 'brisk'. Temporary slackness a few years earlier had allegedly been
overcome without serious hardship. (fn. 33)
Notwithstanding the industry's success, Arthur Young
acknowledged that mechanization had chiefly benefited
manufacturers rather than weavers and other employees,
whose wages in 1807 were depressed and whose numbers
he claimed had fallen from 400 to 150 over five years. (fn. 34)
The catastrophic impact on rural spinners was emphasized by William Cobbett in 1826, describing the 'decay
and misery' of villages such as Withington (Glos.)
formerly dependent on work from Witney. (fn. 35) Initial
hostility to the spring-loom was widespread in the town,
weavers fearing that it would halve employment and
viewing it 'as sly as a cow at a bastard calf', though in 1838
John Early alleged that they had come to prefer it and that
success in finding new markets had avoided unemployment. Certainly Witney manufacturers seem to have
displayed a genuine paternalistic concern for their
workforce, and both John and Edward Early commented
on the 'good understanding' between master and men
which prevented exploitation and undercutting. There
were then reckoned to be approaching 300 weavers in all,
a few of them immigrants from Gloucestershire: though
wages in Witney were smaller, conditions and regularity
of employment there were nevertheless thought preferable. (fn. 36) A weavers' and spinners' association formed in
1823 was evidently a benefit club rather than a union, and
had apparently closed by 1838. (fn. 37)

38. Witney Mills: spinning
shed, c. 1898
In 1858 the blanket trade was said to be 'leaving'
Witney, and certainly during the 1850s and 1860s the
town's population fell, partly through emigration. (fn. 38) The
problems were evidently temporary, however, the
second half of the century being marked by further
consolidation by two or three large firms, increased
mechanization, and successful expansion of markets. In
particular Charles Early (d. 1912), in business with his
father John (d. 1862) from 1851 and operating as
Charles Early & Co. from 1864, gradually expanded his
business and premises, acquiring overall control of New
Mill in stages from 1883, taking over the separate firm of
Edward Early & Co. (with premises at New Mill and
West End) in 1894, buying Woodford and Witney Mills
(where he was co-lessee) in the 1880s, and acquiring
Henry Early's business at Woodgreen and West End
apparently in the 1890s. (fn. 39) William Smith (d. 1874), who
began as an errand boy working for Edward Early (d.
1835) and his son, established his own business on High
Street around 1850, having bought John George's small
spinning concern on Corn Street with capital from a
short-lived brewery venture. His initial concentration
on mop-making presumably avoided direct competition
with Charles Early, from whom he received help when
additional capacity was needed, and by the 1870s, with
new premises on Bridge Street, he was well established as
a leading manufacturer; his sons and successors William
and Harry took over James and Albert Collier's business
at Crawley Mill and Corn Street about 1879. (fn. 40) James
Marriott (d. 1904), whose family worked as dyers, coal
merchants, and farmers for much of the 19th century,
established a third successful company at the newly built
Mount Mills about 1900, concentrating on wholesale
rather than retail. (fn. 41) The only other firm by then was the
Witney Blanket Company, established around 1885 as
mail-order suppliers rather than manufacturers. (fn. 42)

39. Witney Mills:
power-loom weaving shed,
c. 1898.

40. Witney Mills: fulling stocks,
c. 1898.
William Smith installed Witney's first steam engine
around 1851, apparently for spinning, and John Early
may have introduced power looms in 1858; (fn. 43) thereafter,
with cheap coal available by rail from 1861, steam power
became common. New Mill acquired an engine that
year, (fn. 44) and in 1865 Charles Early extended his powerweaving plant at Witney Mill, several decades after
similar developments in Yorkshire. (fn. 45) His later purchases
allowed for greater integration, and by the 1890s Witney
Mill was a fully mechanized and integrated site, with
most processes, from spinning to finishing, powered by
steam and supplemented by water. Steam-heated chambers allowed tentering in wet weather. (fn. 46) Smith similarly
modernized his plant in the 1860s and 1870s, while in
1904 Marriott's 'new and spacious blanket mill'
included 'the most complete and up-to-date plant'. (fn. 47)
Occasional fires allowed for further updating of
machinery, as at Charles Early's New Mill in 1883 or at
Witney Mill in 1905. (fn. 48)
The industry's main products continued to be blankets and duffels, with waggon-tilts, rugs, and mops. Both
Edward Early (d. 1835) and his protégé William Smith
specialized in mops and tilts, securing large government
orders, while in the 1890s Charles Early (and by then
Smith's) produced 'all kinds' of blankets, rugs, and
coverlets. Machinery at Witney Mills included a few
Jacquard looms, used for rugs of elaborate figured design
destined for South Africa or South America. (fn. 49) Foreign
markets continued to expand: by the 1820s and 1830s
sales through the Hudson Bay Company were supplemented by direct orders from cities in the United States,
Newfoundland, Bermuda, and Australia, as well as from
Scotland and much of southern England, (fn. 50) and in 1895
both Early's and Smith's enjoyed a 'worldwide' reputation. (fn. 51) International links were further reflected in the
industry's wool supplies, drawn in the late 1830s partly
from Russia and the Mediterranean, (fn. 52) and in the 1890s
from Australia, New Zealand, and East India as well as
England. (fn. 53)

41. Occupations in Witney borough, 1851.
Other Trades and Industries, 1800–1900
Though the 19th century saw the foundation of some
long-lasting retail and manufacturing firms, the overall
balance of trades and occupations in the town remained
broadly similar to earlier, with few large employers to
rival the blanket manufacturers. The second largest
sector was the leather industry, still closely associated
with wool supply, and including tanning, shoemaking,
and particularly gloving, which together accounted for
over 12 per cent of recorded occupations in 1851.
Building-workers comprised around 6 per cent, metalworkers under 1 per cent, and miscellaneous craftsmen
or manufacturers around 2 per cent. Among retailers,
suppliers of food and drink remained prominent, with
bakers, butchers, grocers, and confectioners accounting
(with their assistants) for over 5 per cent of recorded
occupations, brewers and publicans for 3 per cent, and
other retailers (including drapers and up to forty shoemakers or cobblers) for nearly 7 per cent. Apart from the
few glove-manufacturers, reliant chiefly on out-workers,
only the builder James Long and the farmer and
woolstapler James Clinch employed twenty people or
more, the next largest non-agricultural employers being
the ironmonger and iron-founder Joseph Staples with
nine, a cabinet-maker and upholsterer with seven, and a
butcher with eight. A farmer at Newland, with 10 farm
workers, employed another 33 labourers in his capacity
as a road surveyor, though not necessarily within the
town. (fn. 54)
Retailers Prominent retail businesses, all concentrated
around High Street and Market Place, included W. H.
Tarrant and Sons' grocers, tea-dealers, and provision
merchants, established on the former Lamb Inn site at
the corner of Corn Street and Market Place by the 1850s.
In the 1890s the firm had its own plantation in Ceylon
(now Sri Lanka), and imported specialist brands claimed
to be rare outside 'large cities'. Saltmarsh and Druce's
grocers, established about 1880 also at Market Square,
stocked similar goods and were wine and spirit
merchants, while Valentine and Barrell, who opened a
large store at Market Square about 1898, were tailors
and drapers, dealers in glass, china, and furniture, and
undertakers. Several other late 19th-century businesses,
though under relatively new ownership, claimed a long
existence, among them Clappen and Co.'s tailors,
drapers, and silk mercers. (fn. 55) There were a few booksellers,
stationers, and printers: James Shayler, a stationer and
bookseller by 1815, printed sale catalogues and handbills, and from 1861 the firm published the newly
founded Witney Express. (fn. 56) As earlier there were several
watch- or clockmakers, one of whom in the 1890s was
also a jeweller and tobacconist, (fn. 57) and there were usually
three or four retail druggists and chemists. (fn. 58)
Inns and Breweries Up to forty inns, public houses, and
beer-sellers were listed in the early 19th century, and a
'considerable' trade in malt was mentioned in 1840: five
maltsters were recorded in 1823–4, and eight or nine in
the 1850s, (fn. 59) some of them relatively large commercial
brewers supplying several houses. Clinch's Eagle
Brewery was established about 1839 by John Williams
Clinch (d. 1871), whose family in the early 19th century
were farmers, maltsters, and wool-dealers, and who also
founded Clinch's bank. (fn. 60) A stone-built brewery, 'the best
Victorian industrial building in Witney', was erected
west of Church Green before 1841. (fn. 61) The business seems
at first to have been partly dependent on other family
ventures, but from the 1880s, when William Clinch
went into partnership with his sons-in-law, it expanded
rapidly: in 1892 (as Clinch and Co.) it became a private
limited company, the number of tied houses increasing
from 17 in 1867 to 72 in 1891, although outside Witney
it served a relatively small rural area. (fn. 62) A rival, in the
former Blanket Hall on High Street, was established
soon after 1847 by Edward Early's son Joseph and
Edward's employee and tenant William Smith, at first
using brewing equipment left by the disbanded Blanket
Company. Smith expanded the plant but, following
disputes with his partners, set up the White Hart
brewery and malting business on Bridge Street about
1851; though that proved successful, he sold it a few
years later to set up as a blanket manufacturer. (fn. 63) The
Blanket Hall Brewery, continued by Early and, later, by
the Shillingford brothers and by Arthur Bateman of
Asthall, was bought by Clinch's in 1890, with around 23
tied houses. (fn. 64) The Britannia Brewery east of the market
place, reportedly established by William Gillett in 1860,
was sold with four tied houses in 1875 to Hunt Edmunds
Brewery of Banbury, which subsequently acquired
numerous Witney public houses. (fn. 65)
Building Trades Building-workers included some
thirty stonemasons and as many carpenters or joiners in
the mid 19th century, with rather fewer slaters, plasterers, plumbers, glaziers, painters, and sawyers. (fn. 66) Of
particular note were the builders and timber-merchants
James Long and Malachi Bartlett, who cooperated on
several major buildings including the new Wesleyan
chapel (1849–50). Bartlett (d. 1875) moved to Witney
from Devon about 1836, and from 1852 worked in partnership with his son William Christopher (d. 1918), the
firm continuing as Bartlett Brothers into the late 20th
century; besides burning their own bricks and lime,
Bartletts' reputedly installed the first steam-driven
sawmill and machine-shop in the district, and by 1880
used mechanical concrete-mixers. (fn. 67) Also important in
the late 19th century was William Cantwell of Witney
and Newland, builder of several local factories including
Witney Mills and New Mill. (fn. 68) Small quarries around
Corn Street continued to be worked: several there were
mentioned in the 1840s and 1850s, (fn. 69) and the Union
quarry near Tower Hill, opened for building Witney
workhouse in 1835, (fn. 70) was later let to Bartletts', which
reportedly employed over fifty men with mechanical
stone-dressing and cutting machinery. (fn. 71) After 1861
stone was also brought in by rail: Bartletts' imported
500–600 tons of Bath stone a year through Witney and
Faringdon stations, while some local stone (not necessarily from Witney) was exported. (fn. 72)
Leatherwork and Gloving Leather-workers in the
earlier 19th century included numerous shoemakers, up
to seven saddlers and harness-makers, four or five
curriers and tanners, and a few fellmongers, (fn. 73) the latter
connected, as earlier, with wool supply for blanketmanufacturers. (fn. 74) Thomas Sylvester (d. 1853), a fellmonger established on High Street by 1823, had three
employees in 1851, and, like other Witney curriers and
leather-cutters, supplied craftsmen in surrounding
villages as well as in the town. (fn. 75) The farmer Samuel
Shuffrey's tannery at Woodgreen, established reportedly
in 1810, continued until the 1890s when it was superseded by a steam-powered saw-works and joinery, and
in 1851 employed three men and an apprentice. (fn. 76)

42. Leigh and Sons' ironmongers, Market Square, c.1930.

43. Boiler supplied for Witney Mills by Daniel Young of Witney, 1896.
A 'glove manufactory' housed in a three-storeyed
building behind premises at Church Green, sold in 1833,
apparently closed soon after. (fn. 77) Glove-making nevertheless provided work for nearly 150 inhabitants in 1851,
mostly women employed as out-workers by three or four
Witney manufacturers. (fn. 78) Of those by far the largest was
William Pritchett, a Woodstock glover established at
Newland before 1830; in 1851 he employed several
hundred workers, many presumably in surrounding
villages. (fn. 79) About 1885 Pritchett's son William entered into
partnership with William Webley, of another prominent
Woodstock gloving family, who seems to have been
largely responsible for the construction soon afterwards
of a mechanized factory at Newland, with steam-powered
machinery for grounding and finishing skins. In the
1890s the factory specialized in officers' dress-gloves,
waterproof driving-gloves made from tanned sheepskins
imported from Cape Colony, and doeskin and buckskin
gloves, the latter made from reindeer skin; some were
exported to Europe, the USA, and Japan, the firm reportedly being 'taxed to keep up with demand'. Of 200–300
employees around sixty worked at the factory, the rest
being makers and finishers in Witney and surrounding
villages. (fn. 80) The firm also set up as blanket- and cyclemanufacturers at Worsham Mill in Asthall, though the
blanket business failed in the early 20th century, apparently through poor management. (fn. 81)
Metalwork, Engineering, and Miscellaneous Trades
Metal-working and ironmongery employed only small
numbers, though in some long-lasting businesses.
Among them were Staples and Lea (later Leigh and
Jackson), established on High Street before 1840;
besides being ironmongers they were gas-fitters, bellhangers, locksmiths, and brass- and iron-founders with
their own forge, providing fittings for Witney church in
the 1840s, and from the 1860s leasing the town
gasworks. By the 1890s, when run by Samuel Lea's
nephew Arthur Lea Leigh, the firm had extensive workshops and warehouses around its main premises on the
corner of Corn Street and Market Square; it undertook
machine- and implement repair and made builders' and
constructional ironwork, using recently introduced
steam-power for turning and boring. (fn. 82) Other prominent
ironmongers, braziers, and tin-plate workers included
Henry Long and Sons of High Street, which succeeded
an existing firm in 1866, and Thomas Clarke and Sons,
who in the 1890s were also timber- and slatemerchants. (fn. 83) An ironmonger in the 1840s was also a gunand locksmith. (fn. 84)
The introduction of steam power from the 1860s
encouraged heavier industry, and in 1872 Witney's first
engineering firm, that of Daniel Young, was established
on Bridge Street. Young supplied and serviced steam
engines, condensers, and other heavy industrial equipment, employing 3 men and 3 boys in 1881, and in 1899
he advertised as a mechanical and consulting engineer
and agent, boiler-maker, millwright, and brassfounder. (fn. 85) Coal merchants, recorded from the early 19th
century, (fn. 86) also benefited from the opening of the railway
and from mechanization. A coal business established in
the 1820s by the dyers James and William Marriott was
continued first by William's widow Blanche and later by
their nephew James (d. 1904), who by 1876 had depots
at Witney, Eynsham, Bampton, and Hanborough
stations and at Newbridge wharf (in Northmoor). He
continued as a coal, coke, and salt merchant alongside
his farming, dyeing, and (from the 1890s) blanketmaking activities, the firm becoming a private limited
company in the early 20th century. (fn. 87)
Small manufacturers in the mid 19th century
included two or three umbrella-makers, a parchmentmaker, and nine or ten cabinet-makers and upholsterers, of whom two employed five or more assistants
including apprentices. (fn. 88) Coach-builders included Francis
Looker and T. W. Cook, respectively established on
High Street and Corn Street by the 1850s and 1870s, and
surviving as coach- and motor-body building firms in
the 1930s. (fn. 89) Two or three twine- and rope-manufacturers
were mentioned from the 1840s, among them William
Ford's twine and matting business on Corn Street, which
continued to the 1920s. (fn. 90) Artificial fertilizer was manufactured at Farm Mill in the 1870s. (fn. 91) A motor garage and
cycle works at West End, producing the so-called
'Witney cycle', and Long's cycle and motor stores on
High Street, a successor of Pritchett's short-lived bicycle
factory at Worsham, both opened in the late 1890s,
continuing as motor-repair garages in the 1930s. (fn. 92)
Professions and Services The town's manufacturers and
tradesmen, together with significant numbers of gentry,
fundholders, and property-owners, (fn. 93) required the
services of numerous professionals. In the early 19th
century there were usually three or four solicitors,
among them Daniel Westell (d. 1846), whose family
firm continued until the early 20th century. N. G.
Ravenor's firm, which became Ravenor & Cuthbert and
later Ravenor, Batt & Lee, continued as Lee, Chadwick &
Co. in the late 20th century, having absorbed Westell
and Son before 1920. Westell served as steward of
Witney manor and as solicitor for the vestry, his successors in the 1880s acting also as coroner, bailiff of the
county court, and clerk to the burial board. (fn. 94) Prominent
auctioneers included the architect William Wilkinson
(1819–1901), son of a Witney builder and carpenter,
who until the mid 1850s practised in the town as a
surveyor, auctioneer, and builder, and as a timber-,
stone-, and lime-merchant. (fn. 95) Later auctioneers were
William Seely (d. 1895), also an architect and builder,
and John Habgood and Son, who were established on
Market Square, next to Tarrants' grocers, by the 1880s,
and continued as estate agents in the 1950s. (fn. 96) Successive
members of the Batt and Hyde families were surgeons
for most of the 19th century, Edward Hyde (d. 1880)
marrying into the Early family; (fn. 97) they, too, were prominent in town affairs, the Batts running a private lunatic
asylum on High Street from 1823 to 1857. (fn. 98)
A bank founded in the 1790s by the surgeon Edward
Batt (d. 1799), with the solicitor Charles Leake, the
brewer Charles Sanders, and the mealman James
Holton, (fn. 99) was superseded about 1802 by a new partnership between Batt's sons and John Backshell, which
issued its own banknotes. (fn. 100) It was bankrupted in 1815, (fn. 101)
and soon after a new bank was set up by the farmer,
maltster and wool-dealer John Clinch (d. 1827) and his
son John Williams Clinch (d. 1871), founder of Clinch's
brewery. Mismanagement by the younger Clinch and his
sons James and William may have contributed to
William's financial difficulties in the 1870s, and in 1877
William sold the bank to Gilletts' of Oxford, which
already had an agency at Witney and was particularly
attracted by Clinch's authorization to issue banknotes.
By the 1880s the volume of business at Gilletts' Witney
branch exceeded that at Oxford, reflecting the custom of
prominent blanket manufacturers; the London and
County Bank, which had opened an agency at Witney by
the early 1850s, was unable to compete and closed its
Witney branch in 1885, though the Birmingham
Banking Company opened a rival Witney branch the
same year. Its success, despite fierce competition from
Gilletts', presumably reflected the extent of trade in the
town, and both banks continued there into the 20th
century, Gilletts' being taken over in 1919 by Barclays,
and the Birmingham Banking Company becoming the
Metropolitan and (later) Midland Bank. (fn. 102)
Also catering for wealthier inhabitants were those
engaged in service occupations. In 1851 they included
several hairdressers, chimney-sweeps, and carriers, a
lamplighter, and the postmaster, besides large numbers
of domestic servants and over forty laundresses or washerwomen. (fn. 103)