House of Lords Journal Volume 15: 27 November 1694

Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 15, 1691-1696. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830.

'House of Lords Journal Volume 15: 27 November 1694', in Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 15, 1691-1696, (London, 1767-1830) pp. 436-437. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol15/pp436-437 [accessed 26 April 2024]

DIE Martis, 27 Novembris.

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt.



Epus. Durham. Epus. Winton. Epus. Rochester. Epus. St. David's. Epus. Bangor. Epus. Oxon. Epus. Ely. Epus. Norwich. Epus. Peterburgh. Epus. Lincolne.	Dux Cumberland. Ds. Senescallus. Dux Richmond. Dux St. Albans. Dux Bolton. March. Halifax. March. Normanby. Comes Bridgewater. Comes Warwicke. Comes Manchester. Comes Stamford. Comes Kingston. Comes Carnarvan. Comes Sandwich. Comes Essex. Comes Bathe. Comes Craven. Comes Maclesfeld. Comes Portland. Comes Monmouth. Comes Montagu. Comes Marleborough. Comes Torrington. Comes Rumney. Viscount Villiers.	Ds. Ferrars. Ds. Fitzwalter. Ds. Howard Eff. Ds. Sidney Pen. Ds. Maynard. Ds. Clifford Laun. Ds. Lucas. Ds. Cornwallis. Ds. Guilford. Ds. Godolphin. Ds. Herbert Chir.

PRAYERS.

Thornhill & al. Creditors of Chute versus Parker.

Upon reading the Petition of Jeremiab Thornhill, John Tilt, and above Sixty more Creditors of George Chute, deceased, Respondents, to the Appeal of Philadelphia Parker and others, the Children of the Lady Parker; shewing, "That an Issue drawn in this Cause, pursuant to an Order of this House, by Mr. Justice Powell and Mr. Baron Powell, coming to be tried before the Justices of the King's Bench, a special Verdict was found, the Court conceiving the said Issue not sufficient to try the Matter in Question; and the Petitioners praying further Directions for enlarging the said Issue:"

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the former Appellants Philadelphia Parker and others may have a Copy of the said Petition; and do put in their Answer thereunto, on Tuesday the Fourth Day of December next, at Ten of the Clock in the Forenoon.

Long versus Reeve, in Error.

This Day the Lord Chief Justice Holt, in the usual Manner, brought in a Writ of Error, wherein,

Anne Long Wid. is Plaintiff, versus
Charles Reeve Defendant.

E. of Banbury, Proceedings in the K. B. concerning the Person who claimed the Title of, for the Murder of Lawson.

A Debate arising, touching the Proceedings in the Court of King's Bench, relating to the Person who claimed the Title of Earl of Banbury;

This Question was put, "Whether Mr. Attorney General shall give this House an Account what Proceedings have been in the Court of King's Bench, since the Eleventh of April One Thousand Six Hundred Ninety and Four, in relation to the Person who claimed the Title of Earl of Banbury?"

It was Resolved in the Affirmative.

Attorney General to give the House an Account of them.

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That Their Majesties Attorney General do give this House an Account, on Tuesday the Fourth Day of December next, what Proceedings there have been in the Court of King's Bench, relating to the Person who claimed the Title of Earl of Banbury, since the Eleventh of April, One Thousand Six Hundred Ninety and four; and that all the Lords be summoned then to attend.

Adjourn.

Joh'es Marchio de Normanby, Orator Procerum, declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Jovis, (videlicet,) vicesimum nonum diem instantis Novembris, hora undecima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.