DIE Jovis, 24 die Novembris.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
|His Royal Highness the Duke of Yorke.
Epus. St. Asaph.
|Sir Orlando Bridgman, Miles et Bar. Ds. Custos Magni Sigilli.
Comes St. Albans.
Vicecomes de Stafford.
Ds. Berkley de Berk.
Ds. Arundell de Warder.
Ds. Howard de Esc.
Ds. Howard de Castle Rysing.
vice lecta est Billa, "An Act to enable
Robert Bellamy to sell Lands, for Payment of his
The Question being put, "Whether this Bill shall
It was Resolved in the Negative.
Kidderminster Stuffs Bill.
vice lecta est Billa, "An Act for the regulating the Making of Kidderminster Stuffs."
Ld. Hatton takes his Seat.
This Day Christopher Lord Hatton, Baron de Kirby,
sat in Parliament, by virtue of a Writ of Summons under His Majesty's Great Seal of England, dated the 21
Day of October, Anno Domini nostri Regis Caroli
Secundi Vicesimo-secundo, upon the Death of Christopher
Lord Hatton, his Father.
E. of Westmorland, Privilege, versus L. Holles, concerning the Manor of Aldenham, &c.
Upon Report made by the Lord Viscount Stafford,
from the Lords Committees for Privileges, "That
whereas this House referred a Complaint of the Earl
of Westmerland, of a Breach of Privilege, to be
examined; their Lordships could not proceed therein, in regard the Order mentions no Person that hath
dispossessed his Lordship, neither is there any Time
or Place when or where the Fact was committed;"
the House being now informed, on Behalf of the Earl
of Westmerland, "That the Land his Lordship is dispossessed of is the Manor of Aldenham, and Lands
thereunto belonging, in the County of Hertford;
and that he was so dispossessed on the Second Day of
this Instant November, by John Burgoyne then Undersheriff of the County of Hertford, and William Walker
Attorney at Law, in an Action of Ejectment (wherein
John Reeves was Plaintiff), assisted by Nathaniell
Stratton Bailiff, and several others:"
It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal
in Parliament assembled, That the Examination of this
Complaint is referred to the Lords Committees for Privileges, whose Lordships are afterwards to make Report
unto this House.
De Vaux versus Colladon.
Upon hearing Counsel this Day at the Bar, on both
Parts, in the Cause upon the Petition of Sir Theodore
de Vaux Knight, being an Appeal from certain Proceedings in the Court of Chancery, relating to the
Estate of Ester the Daughter of Edward de Pleurs deceased, and the Answer of Sir John Colladon Knight
After due Consideration had of what was offered by
Counsel on either Part, the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled do order and adjudge, That
the Accompt mentioned in the said Petition shall be
made de novo, in the Court of Chancery, by Sir John
Colladon; and that the said Sir Theodore De Vauxand Sir
John Colladon shall give such Security as the Court of
Chancery shall approve of, to make Payment and Satisfaction, according as the said Court shall thereupon direct: And it is recommended by this House to the Lord
Keeper of the Great Seal of England, to take Care that
the said Ester De Pleurs (now the Wife of John Wells
Esquire) may have Right done to her upon the Sequel
of the said Accompt: And it is further ORDERED and
Adjudged, That the Court of Chancery shall consider
and appoint what Charges shall be paid, if, upon the
Determination of the Cause, any shall be thought fit to
Dominus Custos Magni Sigilli declaravit præsens
Parliamentum continuandum esse usque in diem Veneris,
25um diem instantis Novembris, hora decima Aurora,
Dominis sic decernentibus.