DIE Sabbati, 14 die Novembris.
REX.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
|
|
|
Arch. Cant.
Arch. Yorke.
Epus. London.
Epus. Durham.
Epus. Winton.
Epus. Sarum.
Epus. Norwich.
Epus. Lyncolne.
Epus. Oxon.
Epus. Exon.
Epus. St. Asaph.
Epus. Gloucester.
Epus. Ely.
Epus. Carlile.
Epus. Rochester.
Epus. Bath & Wells.
Epus. Chichester.
Epus. Peterborough.
Epus. Bristol. |
L. Chancellor.
L. Treasurer.
L. Privy Seal.
L. Steward.
Duke of Somerset.
Duke of Grafton.
Duke of Beaufort.
Marq. of Hallyfax.
L. Chamberlain of the Household.
E. of Oxon.
E. of Shrewsbury.
E. of Kent.
E. of Derby.
E. of Huntingdon.
E. of Bedford.
E. of Bridgewater.
E. of Devon.
E. of Manchester.
E. Rivers.
E. of Peterborow.
E. of Kingston.
E. of Carnarvon.
E. of Strafford.
E. of Sunderland.
E. of Scarsdale.
E. of Anglesey.
E. of Craven.
E. of Aylesbury.
E. of Burlington.
E. of Litchfeild.
E. of Danby.
E. of Feversham.
E. of Radnor.
E. of Yarmouth.
E. of Berkeley.
E. of Nottingham.
E. of Gainesborough.
Vicecomes Fauconberg.
Vicecomes Mordant.
Vicecomes Newport.
Vicecomes Weymouth.
Vicecomes Hatton. |
Ds. Ferrers.
Ds. De Grey.
Ds. Cromwell.
Ds. Paget.
Ds. North.
Ds. Maynard.
Ds. Colepeper.
Ds. Lucas.
Ds. Rockingham.
Ds. Lexington.
Ds. Berkeley.
Ds. Cornwallis.
Ds. Arundell Trerice.
Ds. Butler de Weston.
Ds. Lumley.
Ds. Dartmouth.
Ds. Godolphin.
Ds. Churchill. |
PRAYERS.
Lords take the Oaths.
These Lords following took the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy, and made and subscribed
the Declaration, in Pursuance of the Act for the
more effectual preserving the King's Person and
Government, by disabling Papists sitting in either
House of Parliament:
John Lord Bishop of Chichester.
William Lord Bishop of Norwich.
The same Time Charles Duke of Somersett took the
Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy, and subscribed the
Declaration, according to the Statute made in the 25th
Year of King Charles the Second, intituled, "An Act
for preventing Dangers which may happen from
Popish Recusants."
Eyre & al. versus Eyre & al.
The Lord Chancellor reported the Effect of what
was said by Counsel, at the Bar, in the Case of Appeal, depending in this House between Eyre and Eyrc,
for reversing a Decree made in the Dutchy Court.
And after Debate and Consideration thereof;
The Question being put, "Whether to affirm this
Decree?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Protest against affirming the Decree.
The Earl of Anglesey, before the putting of this
Question, desired Leave to enter his Dissent, if the
Question was carried in the Affirmative.
"Dissentio, Anglesey."
Upon hearing Counsel at the Bar, in the Cause upon
the Petition and Appeal of Thomas Eyre of Hassop
Esquire, William Inge, Henry Balgay Esquire, and divers
others, Freeholders and Inhabitants of the Towns of
Hope, Bradwell, and Wormhill, in the County of Derby,
from a Decree made against them in the Court of the
Dutchy of Lancaster; as also upon the several Answers
of Sir James Butler Knight, the Queen Dowager's Attorney, on the Behalf of Her Majesty, and Her Majesty's Trustees, the Answer of Sir John Heath Knight,
His Majesty's Attorney General of the Dutchy of Lancaster, for and in Behalf of His Majesty, and the
Answer of Thomas Eyre Esquire, and others, Relators,
put in thereunto:
After due Consideration had of what was offered by
Counsel on either Part thereupon; it is Resolved and
Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in
Parliament assembled, That the Petition and Appeal of
the said Thomas Eyre of Hassop Esquire, William Inge,
Henry Balgay Esquire, and divers Freeholders and Inhabitants of the Town of Hope, Bradwell, and Wormhill aforesaid, be, and is hereby, dismissed this House:
And it is further ORDERED, That the Decree made
in the Court of the Dutchy of Lancaster, from which
they appealed to this House, be, and is hereby,
affirmed.
Grenvile versus E. Huntingdon, Privilege waved.
The Counsel of the Earl of Huntingdon was heard
at the Bar, concerning his Lordship's claiming his Privilege of Parliament, against the Proceedings of Bernard Greenvile Esquire, a Member of the House of
Commons; but no Counsel appeared for Mr. Greenvile:
And the House being informed, That the Plaintiff
Mr. Greenvile was at the Door;
It was moved, "he might be called in."
But, upon Debate, these Two Questions were proposed:
"1. Whether the Petition shall be dismissed?"
"2. Whether the Petitioner shall be called in?"
The Question being put, "Whether the First Question shall be now put?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Then,
The Question was put, "Whether the Petition
shall be dismissed?"
It was Resolved in the Negative.
Afterwards,
The Question was put, "Whether the Petitioner
shall be now called in?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Mr. Greenvile was called in; and asked, "What he
had to say to the House?"
He said, "That he has petitioned against the Earl
of Huntingdon, for claiming his Privilege of Parliament,
to stop a Proceeding at Law which he had commenced
against the said Earl." He said, "he never claimed his
Privilege in his Life, nor will in this Cause: And
the Reason why he had no Counsel this Day to appear for him was, because the Earl of Huntingdon
had threatened them, if they did appear."
Hereupon the Earl of Huntingdon declared in the
House, "That he did wave his Privilege of Parliament in this Cause."
And the House caused the waving of both their
Privileges to be entered accordingly.
Indictment against the E. of Stamford, delivered in.
This Day Tanner, the Clerk of the Peace
for the City of London, according to the Order of this
House, delivered in an Indictment against the Earl of
Stamford.
Which was received.
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque in diem Lunæ, 16um diem
instantis Novembris, hora decima Aurora, Dominis sic
decernentibus.