House of Lords Journal Volume 17
2 October 1704

Sponsor

History of Parliament Trust

Publication

Year published

1767-1830

Pages

Annotate

Comment on this article
Double click anywhere on the text to add an annotation in-line

Citation Show another format:

'House of Lords Journal Volume 17: 2 October 1704', Journal of the House of Lords: volume 17: 1701-1705 (1767-1830), pp. 570-571. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=14780 Date accessed: 21 September 2014.


Highlight

(Min 3 characters)

DIE Jovis, 2 Novembris.

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:

Arch. Cant.
Epus. London.
Epus. Lich. & Cov.
Epus. Petrib.
Epus. Carliol.
Epus. St. Asaph.
Ds. Custos Magni Sigilli.
Comes Pembroke, Præses.
Comes Kent, Camerarius.
Comes Derby.
Comes Northampton.
Comes Stamford.
Comes Sunderland.
Comes Scarsdale.
Comes Feversham.
Comes Berkeley.
Comes Abingdon.
Comes Portland.
Comes Bradford.
Comes Orford.
Ds. Pagett.
Ds. Brooke.
Ds. Poulett.
Ds. Howard Esc.
Ds. Mohun.
Ds. Vaughan.
Ds. Colepeper.
Ds. Craven.
Ds. Guilford.
Ds. Sommers.
Ds. Halifax.

PRAYERS.

Harley & al. versus Searle & al.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of William Harley and Daniel Smith, Executors of Francis Riggs, from a Decree made in the Court of Chancery, on or about the Seventh Day of August, in the Thirteenth Year of the Reign of His late Majesty King William the Third, in certain Causes then and there depending; whereof one of them between Edward Searle and Elizabeth his Wife (by him as her next Friend) Plaintiffs, against the Petitioners, and Elizabeth Wife of the Petitioner Daniel Smith, and John Betts and Mary his Wife, Defendants; and the other, between the said John Betts and Mary his Wife Complainants, against the Petitioners, and Elizabeth Wife of the Petitioner Daniel Smith, and the said Edward Searle and Elizabeth his Wife, and Hamey Burwell, Defendants; praying the Reversal of the said Decree:

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Edward Searle and Elizabeth his Wife, and John Betts and Mary his Wife, may have a Copy of the said Appeal; and shall and they are hereby required to put in their Answers thereunto, in Writing, on Friday the Seventeenth Day of this Instant November, at Eleven a Clock in the Forenoon.

Sir H. Dutton Colt versus Young.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Sir Henry Dutton Colt Baronet, from a Decree of the Court of Chancery, made the Four and Twentieth Day of May last, in a Cause there depending, between James Young Complainant, and the said Sir Henry Dutton Colt Defendant; and praying, "That the said Decree may be reversed; and that a Day may be appointed for the said James Young to put in his Answer thereunto; and that all Proceedings below be stayed:"

It is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said James Young may have a Copy of the said Appeal; and do and he is hereby required to put in his Answer thereunto, in Writing, on Monday the Thirteenth Day of this Instant November, at Eleven a Clock in the Forenoon; and that all Proceedings in the Courts below shall be stayed; and that the Service of this Order upon the Respondent's Clerk in Chancery shall be good Service, in order thereunto.

Adjourn.

Dominus Custos Magni Sigilli declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Veneris, tertium diem instantis Novembris, hora undecima Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.