Die Jovis, 25 Februarii 1830.
DOMINI tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
fuerunt:
Dux Gloucester.
|
|
| Ds. Lyndhurst. Cancellarius. |
Archiep.
Cantuar
.
Epus.
Londinen
.
Epus.
Winton
.
Epus.
Elien
.
Epus.
Bath. et Well
.
Epus.
Lincoln
.
Epus.
Exon
.
Epus.
Glocestr
.
Epus.
Cicestrien
.
Epus.
Bristol
.
Epus.
Landaven
.
Epus.
Cestrien
.
Epus.
Oxon
.
Ds.
Willoughby de Eresby
Ds.
Stourton
.
Ds.
Saye & Sele
.
Ds.
Clifton
.
Ds.
Teynham
.
Ds.
Clifford of Chudleigh
.
Ds.
Gower
.
Ds.
Colville of Culross
.
Ds.
King
.
Ds.
Montfort
.
Ds.
Grantham
.
Ds.
Holland
.
Ds.
Vernon
.
Ds.
Foley
.
Ds.
Dynevor
.
Ds.
Grantley
.
Ds.
Auckland
.
Ds.
Mendip
.
Ds.
Calthorpe
.
Ds.
De Dunstanville & Bassett
.
Ds.
Rolle
.
Ds.
Carrington
.
Ds.
Northwick
.
Ds.
Lilford
.
Ds.
Fitz Gibbon
.
Ds.
Redesdale
.
Ds.
Rivers
.
Ds.
Ellenborough
.
Ds.
Ailsa
.
Ds.
Hill
.
Ds.
Melbourne
.
Ds.
Churchill
.
Ds.
Prudhoe
.
Ds.
Glenlyon
.
Ds.
Bexley
.
Ds.
Somerhill
.
Ds.
Wharncliffe
.
Ds.
Seaford
.
Ds.
Fife
.
Ds.
Tenterden
.
Ds.
Clanwilliam
.
Ds.
Durham
.
Ds.
Wallace
. |
Comes
Bathurst
, Præses.
Comes
Rosslyn
, C.P.S.
Dux
Norfolk
, Marescallus.
Dux
Richmond
.
Dux
Manchester
.
Dux
Wellington
.
March.
Tweeddale
.
March.
Lansdowne
.
March.
Salisbury
.
March.
Hertford
.
March.
Bute
.
March.
Cholmondeley
.
March.
Bristol
.
March.
Cleveland
.
Comes
Westmorland
.
Comes
Chesterfield
.
Comes
Carlisle
.
Comes
Shaftesbury
.
Comes
Abingdon
.
Comes
Jersey
.
Comes
Erroll
.
Comes
Rosebery
.
Comes
Ferrers
.
Comes
Tankerville
.
Comes
Cowper
.
Comes
Stanhope
.
Comes
Pomfret
.
Comes
Cornwallis
.
Comes
Radnor
.
Comes
Digby
.
Comes
Mount Cashell
.
Comes
Mayo
.
Comes
Wicklow
.
Comes
Romney
.
Comes
Charleville
.
Comes
Orford
.
Comes
Verulam
.
Comes
Morley
.
Comes
Bradford
.
Comes
Glengall
.
Comes
Eldon
.
Comes
Dudley
.
Comes
Cawdor
.
Vicecom.
Hereford
.
Vicecom.
Strathallan
.
Vicecom.
Duncan
.
Vicecom.
Melville
.
Vicecom.
Gordon
.
Vicecom.
Granville
.
Vicecom.
Goderich
. |
PRAYERS.
Rothschild v. Brookman.
The Answer of
James Brookman
to the Petition and
Appeal of
Nathan Mayer Rothschild
was this Day
brought in.
Morgan v. Evans et al.
As was also, The joint and separate Answer of
John
Jenkins and
Philip Hurd to the Petition and Appeal of
Francis Morgan.
Morgan v. Evans et al.
And also, The separate Answer of
Herbert Evans to
the Petition and Appeal of
Francis Morgan.
Church Building Act, Petition from University of Cambridge respecting.
Upon reading the Petition of The Chancellor, Masters
and Scholars of the University of
Cambridge, under their
Common Seal; praying their Lordships, "when the
Clause contained in the Act of the Seventh and Eighth
Years of the Reign of His present Majesty, intituled,
"An Act to amend the Acts for building and promoting the building of additional Churches in populous
Parishes," enacting that it shall be lawful for the Commissioners to declare that the Right of nominating a
Minister to a new Chapel shall be vested in the Person
building and endowing the same, is again brought under
their Lordships Consideration, so to modify its Provision that it may be rendered as nearly conformable
as possible with the Principles of our Ecclesiastical
Polity, and with the established Rule of Law respecting the Rights of the Patron, Parson and Ordinary:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Taylor et al. v. Sir W. Forbes & Co. Petition to revive on Part of Appellant, referred to Appeal Comee.
Upon reading the Petition of
George M'Cullum Esquire,
residing in
India Street, Edinburgh, Captain
Andrew
Wauch, late of the Forty-eighth Regiment of Foot, Captain
Robert Gray, also late of the said Forty-eighth Regiment,
William Girdwood, Merchant in
Leith, and
George
M'Cullum, Writer to the Signet, Executors of the last
Will and Testament of Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor
of the said Forty-eighth Regiment, deceased, some of the
Appellants in a Cause depending in this House, to which
the late Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor and the Petitioners were Appellants, and Sir
William Forbes and
Company are Respondents; setting forth, "That the
said Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor, and the Petitioners as his Factors, Commissioners and Attornies, on
or about the 17th Day of
January 1828 presented
their Petition and Appeal to their Lordships, complaining of certain Interlocutors therein mentioned, pronounced by the Lord Ordinary in a certain Action
raised in the Court of
Session in
Scotland, at the Instance
of the said Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor, against
Patrick Taylor, John Taylor and
William Taylor, and
Sir
William Forbes, James Hunter and Company,
Bankers in
Edinburgh: That the said Respondents
having put in their Answer to the said Appellants Case,
the said Appeal was set down for hearing, and stands
in their Lordships List of Appeals: That since the
said Appeal has been set down for hearing, the said
Appellant Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor departed
this Life, having first duly made and published his last
Will and Testament, and appointed the Petitioners
Executors thereof: That the Petitioners are advised
that the said Appeal has become abated by reason of
the Death of the said Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor,
and that it has become necessary to revive the same
in their Names as such Executors;" and therefore
praying, "That their Lordships will be pleased to order
that the said Appeal and Proceedings, so abated as
aforesaid, may stand and be revived, and be in the
same Plight and Condition as the same were in at the
Decease of the said Appellant Lieutenant Colonel
James Taylor:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which
Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now
depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and
Writs of Error, have not been delivered, pursuant to the
Standing Orders of this House.
Scotv. Irving, Respondent's Petition to dismiss Appeal, referred to Appeal Com
ee.
Upon reading the Petition of
John Irving, Respondent
in a Cause depending in this House, to which
Archibald
Scot is Appellant; setting forth, "That on the 19th of
June last the Appellant presented his Appeal to their
Lordships against an Interlocutor of the 2d of
May
preceding, pronounced by The Lord
Medwyn, Ordinary, on a Bill of Suspension at the Appellant's
Instance against the Respondent, and against Two
Interlocutors in his said Appeal stated to have been
pronounced by the Second Division of the Court of
Session on the 13th and 15th Days of the same Month
of
May, and also against an Interlocutor of The Lord
Fullerton, Ordinary, of the same 15th of
May, and
an Interlocutor of the said Second Division of the
Court, of the 30th of
May 1829: That the said Appeal
has been brought before their Lordships most irregularly, in as much as no such Interlocutors as those of
the 13th and 15th of
May, stated in the Appellant's
said Appeal, were pronounced by the said Second Division of the Court, nor has the said Interlocutor of
the said Lord
Medwyn, Ordinary, been reviewed by
them: That by the Act of Parliament of the 48th Year
of the Reign of His late Majesty, Chapter 151, it is (in
Section 16) enacted as follows; "nor shall any Appeal
to the House of Lords be allowed from Interlocutors
or Decrees of Lords Ordinary which have not been
reviewed by the Judges sitting in the Division to which
such Lords Ordinary belong:" That the said Interlocutor of The Lord
Medwyn, Ordinary, not having
been reviewed, as directed by the said Act of Parliament, could not be made the Subject of an Appeal before
their Lordships; and such Interlocutor is still subsisting,
and in full Force against the Appellant: That the
Appellant attempted to get these Proceedings reviewed
by another Lord Ordinary, and accordingly presented
a Bill of Suspension to Lord
Fullerton, Ordinary, who
finding this Proceeding totally irregular in point of
Form, pronounced the Interlocutor of the 15th of
May
last, which is stated in the Petition of Appeal, refusing
the Bill as incompetent, "in respect that by the Fifteenth Section of the Act of Sederunt the Mode of
Review applicable to Interlocutors of the Bill Chamber
in the Time of Session is declared to be by Reclaiming
Note to the Court:" That the Appellant brought this
last-mentioned Interlocutor under Review of the First
Division; but their Lordships, seeing that this Matter
had already been before the other Division of the
Court, on the 27th of
May last remitted the Case to
the Second Division of the Court; and the Lords of
the Second Division, of the 30th of
May 1829, pronounced the Interlocutor last appealed from in the
present Appeal: That the said Interlocutors of Lord
Fullerton, Ordinary, and of the Second Division of
the Court of
Session, relate merely to a Matter of
Practice in the Proceedings of the Court of
Session,
regulated by an Act of Sederunt made under the
Authority of an Act of Parliament of the 6th Year of
the Reign of His present Majesty, Chapter 120, and
not upon the Merits of any Question existing between
the Parties; and the Respondent submits that it could
not regularly form the Subject of an Appeal to their
Lordships: That by another Appeal depending before
their Lordships, at the Instance of the present Appellant against
James Ker, and others, as Respondents, it
appears that the Appellant was sequestrated and made
Bankrupt in the Month of
February 1829; and though
the Appellant has presented his Appeal against the
Interlocutors pronounced in the said Sequestration, the
same still stand existing and unreversed: That the
Appellant himself entered into the Recognizance to
the King, in regard to his Appeal against the
Petitioner; but in the Situation in which he stands
under the aforesaid Sequestration, the Petitioner humbly
conceives that the Appellant's Recognizance ought
not to be held as sufficient, in the Circumstances of
this Case;" and therefore praying their Lordships,
That in the special Circumstances of this Case the
present Appeal may be dismissed, or that their Lordships will give the Petitioner such Relief in the Premises, as to their Lordships, in their great Wisdom,
shall seem meet:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which
Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now
depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and Writs
of Error, have not been delivered, pursuant to the Standing
Orders of this House.
Allardice & Boswell v. Robertson, Respondent's Petition for an early Day, referred to Appeal Com
ee.
Upon reading the Petition of
John Robertson, Respondent in a Cause depending in this House, to which
Robert
Barclay Allardice and
John Boswell Esquires are Appellants; praying their Lordships, "That this Appeal may
be appointed to be heard according to the Provisions
and Directions of the Act of the 55th Year of His
late Majesty King
George the Third, to facilitate the
Administration of Justice in that Part of the United
Kingdom called
Scotland, by the extending Trial by
Jury to Civil Causes, or on such other Day as their
Lordships may please to appoint:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the
Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which
Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now
depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and Writs
of Error, have not been delivered, pursuant to the Standing
Orders of this House.
Faussett v. Carpenter, in Error.
The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing Counsel to argue the Errors
assigned upon the Writ of Error wherein
Charles
Faussett is Plaintiff, and
Michael Carpenter, Lessee
of
James Palmer Esquire and others, is Defendant:"
It is
Ordered, That this House will hear the said Errors
argued, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day
for Causes after those already appointed.
Pluck v. Digges & White, in Error.
The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing Counsel to argue the Errors
assigned upon the Writ of Error wherein
Patrick Pluck
is Plaintiff, and
Montgomery Digges and
Thomas White
are Defendants:"
It is
Ordered, That this House will hear the said Errors
argued, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day
for Causes after those already appointed.
Distress of the Country, Petitions from Manchester & Salford respecting.
Upon reading the Petition of the Retail Dealers
resident in District No. 13 in the Town of
Manchester,
whose Names are thereunto subscribed:
And also, Upon reading the Petition of the Retail
Dealers of
Salford, in the County of
Lancaster, whose
Names are thereunto subscribed; severally praying their
Lordships, "That they will make immediate Enquiry into
the Distress of the Country, and grant Relief by a
great and instant Reduction of the Taxes:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petitions do lie on the
Table.
East India, &c. Trade Petitions from Saddleworth & Merchants Co. of Edinburgh, for opening.
Upon reading the Petition of the Merchants, Manufacturers and others connected with the Commercial
Interests of the Parish of
Saddleworth, in the West
Riding of
Yorkshire, whose Names are thereunto subscribed; praying, "That their Lordships will take the
distressed State of Commerce and Agriculture into
most serious Consideration, and afford them that
Relief which would doubtless arise from the Permission
of a Free Trade to
India and
China:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Upon reading the Petition of the Company of Merchants of the City of
Edinburgh incorporated by Royal
Charter and Act of Parliament, under their Common
Seal; praying their Lordships "to remove the Restrictions
with which the Commerce of this Country to
India is
at present fettered, and to throw open the Trade to
China, under such Regulations as to their Lordships
may seem proper:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Accounts delivered:
The House being informed, "That Mr.
Charles Crafer,
from the Treasury, attended;"
He was called in; and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to Orders of the 15th and 18th Days of this instant
February,
Stamps on certain Notes:
"An Account of all Stamps issued for £5 Notes and
£10 Notes, for each Quarter from 5th
January 1826
to 5th
January 1830, so far as relates to
Great
Britain:"
Also, "An Account of all Stamps issued for £5 Notes,
for each Quarter from 1st of
January 1826 up to the
present Time, and a similar Account of Stamps for
£10 Notes, so far as relates to
Ireland:"
Country Bankers Notes stamped;
Also, "An Account of the Number and Value of all
Country Bankers Notes stamped in
Great Britain in
each of the Years 1826, 1827, 1828 and 1829, distinguishing the several Classes of Notes according to their
respective Values:"
and unstamped:
And also, "An Account of the Value of Unstamped
Notes of Country Bankers for which Composition has
been paid in
Great Britain in each of the Years 1826,
1827, 1828 and 1829."
Mr.
Charles Crafer also delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to the Directions of an Act of Parliament,
Salaries of Receivers General of Taxes.
"An Account of the Salaries, Allowances or other
Emoluments in any Manner accruing to the several
Receivers General of the Taxes under the Act
3d
George 4th, Cap. 88, within the Year ending 5th
January 1830."
And then he withdrew.
And the Titles thereof being read by the Clerk;
Ordered, That the said Accounts do lie on the Table.
Ordered, That the said Accounts be printed.
Bengal, &c. Establishments, Papers respecting, delivered, & referred to East India Com
ee
The House being informed, "That Mr.
Danvers, from
the Court of Directors of The
East India Company,
attended;"
He was called in; and delivered at the Bar, pursuant
to Orders of the 12th Day of this instant
February,
"A Return of the Establishments connected with the
Civil Offices under the Presidency of
Bengal, shewing
the Number of Persons and the Expence attaching to
each Establishment, as it stood on the 1st
May 1817
and on the 1st of
May 1827, and stating likewise the
Date of new Establishments or of any considerable
Augmentations, and the Reasons assigned for the
same:"
Also, "A Return of the Establishments connected
with the Civil Offices under the Presidency of
Madras,
shewing the Number of Persons and the Expence
attaching to each Establishment, as it stood on the
1st
May 1817 and on the 1st of
May 1827, and stating
likewise the Date of new Establishments or of any
considerable Augmentations, and the Reasons assigned
for the same:"
Also, "A Return of the Establishments connected with
the Civil Offices under the Presidency of
Bombay,
shewing the Number of Persons and the Expence
attaching to each Establishment, as it stood on the
1st
May 1817 and on the 1st
May 1827, and stating
likewise the Date of new Establishments or of any
considerable Augmentations, and the Reasons assigned
for the same:"
Also, "A Return of all Civil Offices under the Presidency of
Bengal, with the Salary and the Amount and
Nature of any other Allowances annexed to each of
such Offices, as they stood on the 1st
May 1817 and
on the 1st
May 1827; and further stating, in regard to
Offices which have been created or of which the
Salaries or Allowances have been augmented since the
1st
May 1817, the Date of such Creation and of such
Augmentation or Augmentations, and the Reasons
assigned for each respectively:"
Also, "A Return of all Civil Offices under the Presidency of
Madras, with the Salary and the Amount
and Nature of any other Allowances annexed to each
of such Offices, as they stood on the 1st
May 1817
and on the 1st
May 1827; and further stating, in
regard to Offices which have been created or of which
the Salaries or Allowances have been augmented since
the 1st
May 1817, the Date of such Creation and of
such Augmentation or Augmentations, and the Reasons
assigned for each respectively:"
And also, "A Return of all Civil Offices under the
Presidency of
Bombay, with the Salary and the Amount
and Nature of any other Allowances annexed to each
of such Offices, as they stood on the 1st
May 1817
and on the 1st
May 1827; and further stating, in regard
to Offices which have been created or of which the
Salaries or Allowances have been augmented since the
1st
May 1817, the Date of such Creation and of such
Augmentation or Augmentations, and the Reasons
assigned for each respectively."
And then he withdrew.
And the Titles thereof being read by the Clerk;
Ordered, That the said Returns do lie on the Table.
Ordered, That the said Returns be printed.
Ordered, That the said Returns be referred to the
Select Committee appointed to enquire into the present
State of the Affairs of The
East India Company, and into
the Trade between
Great Britain, the
East Indies and
China.
Muskett Leave for a Divorce Bill:
A Petition of
Joseph Salisbury Muskett of
Intwood
Hall, in the County of
Norfolk, Esquire; praying their
Lordships, "That Leave may be given to bring in a Bill
to dissolve his Marriage with
Mary Muskett his now
Wife, and to enable him to marry again," being offered
to be presented to the House;
The House was informed, "That Mr.
John Wood was
attending."
He was Ordered to be called in:
And being called in accordingly, and sworn at the
Bar, delivered a Copy of the Proceedings for a Divorce
a Mensâ et Thoro, and the Definitive Sentence of Divorce
in the
Consistory Court of The Bishop of
London, intituled,
"
Muskett against
Muskett," which he said he had examined with the Originals, and that the same were true
Copies:
And then he withdrew.
Ordered, That the said Proceedings and Sentence do
lie on the Table.
Then the said Petition was presented and read.
Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a Bill
according to the Prayer of the said Petition.
Bill presented:
Accordingly, The Earl of
Shaftesbury presented to the
House a Bill, intituled, "An Act to dissolve the Marriage
of
Joseph Salisbury Muskett Esquire with
Mary Muskett
his now Wife, and to enable him to marry again; and
for other Purposes."
The said Bill was read the First Time.
Order for 2d Reading:
Ordered, That the said Bill be read a Second Time on
Friday the 12th of
March next, and that Notice thereof
be affixed on the Doors of this House, and the Lords
summoned; and that the said
Joseph Salisbury Muskett
may be heard, by his Counsel, at the said Second Reading, to make out the Truth of the Allegations of the
Bill; and that the said
Mary Muskett may have a Copy
of the Bill, and that Notice be given her of the said
Second Reading; and that she be at liberty to be heard
by her Counsel what she may have to offer against the
said Bill at the same Time.
Petitioner to attend.
Ordered, That
Joseph Salisbury Muskett Esquire do
attend this House on
Friday the 12th of
March next, in
order to his being examined upon the Second Reading of
the Bill, intituled, "An Act to disolve the Marriage of
Joseph Salisbury Muskett Esquire with
Mary Muskett
his now Wife, and to enable him to marry again; and
for other Purposes," if the House shall think fit,
whether there has or has not been any Collusion, directly or indirectly, on his Part, relative to any Act of
Adultery that may have been committed by his Wife; or
whether there be any Collusion, directly or indirectly,
between him and his Wife, or any other Person or Persons, touching the said Bill of Divorce, or touching any
Proceedings or Sentence of Divorce had in the Ecclesiastical Court at his Suit, or touching any Action at Law
which may have been brought by him against any Person
for Criminal Conversation with his the said
Joseph Salisbury Muskett's Wife; and also whether, at the Time of
the Adultery of which he complains, his Wife was, by
Deed, or otherwise by his Consent, living separate and
apart from him, and released by him, as far as in him lies,
from her conjugal Duty, or whether she was, at the Time
of such Adultery, cohabiting with him, and under the
Protection and Authority of him as her Husband.
Ld. Ellenborough's Divorce Bill, Witnesses to attend.
Ordered, That
Ann Lewis, Mary Lackenby, William
Walton, Robert Hepple, William Carpenter and Mr.
Learmouth do attend this House on the 9th Day of
March next, in order to their being examined as Witnesses upon the Second Reading of the Bill, intituled,
"An Act to dissolve the Marriage of The Right Honorable
Edward Baron
Ellenborough with The Right
Honorable
Jane Elizabeth Baroness
Ellenborough his
now Wife, and to enable him to marry again; and for
other Purposes therein mentioned."
Disabilities of the Jews, Petition of certain Jews for Removal of.
Upon reading the Petition of the natural-born Subjects
of His Majesty professing the Jewish Religion, whose
Names are thereunto subscribed; praying their Lordships "to take into favorable Consideration the peculiar
Grievances of the Petitioners, and to adopt such
Legislative Measures for the Removal thereof as to
their Lordships, in their Wisdom, shall seem meet:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
Welsh Judicature, Petitions for Modification instead of Abolition of: (Carmarthenshire:)
Upon reading the Petition of the Freeholders of the
County of
Carmarthen, whose Names are thereunto
subscribed:
Mayor, &c. of Carmarthen:
Also, Upon reading the Petition of The Mayor, Burgesses and Commonalty of the County of the Borough of
Carmarthen, under their Common Seal:
Mayor, &c. of Kidwelly:
Also, Upon reading the Petition of The Mayor, Aldermen, Bailiffs and principal Burgesses of the Borough of
Kidwelly, in the County of
Carmarthen, under their
Common Seal, and of the Freeholders and Inhabitants of
the same Town and Borough, whose Names are thereunto
subscribed:
Inhabitants of Carmarthen.
And also, Upon reading the Petition of the Householders and Inhabitants of the County of the Borough
of
Carmarthen, whose Names are thereunto subscribed;
severally praying their Lordships, "not to abolish the
present System of Jurisdiction in
Wales; which System,
if modified and improved, instead of being abolished,
may probably arrive at as much Perfection as is attainable by most human Institutions:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petitions do lie on the
Table.
Against Alteration of: (Cardiganshire.)
Upon reading the Petition of the Freeholders of the
County of
Cardigan, whose Names are thereunto subscribed; praying their Lordships "not to sanction any
Change in the Constitution of the Courts of
Great
Sessions which, according to the proposed Plan of
abolishing them, will deprive the Petitioners of the
Advantages they now enjoy, by the transferring of
their Courts of Justice from their own to neighbouring
Counties:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.
In favour of Alteration of: (Carmarthenshire:) Borough of Carmarthen.
Upon reading the Petition of the Freeholders, Farmers,
Traders and Inhabitants of the County of
Carmarthen,
whose Names are thereunto subscribed:
And also, Upon reading the Petition of the Common
Councilmen, Burgesses, Bankers, Merchants, Farmers,
Traders, Householders and Inhabitants of the County of
the Borough of
Carmarthen, whose Names are thereunto
subscribed; severally praying, "That their Lordships
will take such Measures as may secure to them equal
Rights and Privileges in Matters of Law, in common
with His Majesty's Subjects residing in the Realm of
England:"
It is
Ordered, That the said Petitions do lie on the
Table.
East India Co. Papers respecting, Ordered.
Ordered, That there be laid before this House, "A
Statement of the Amount of the Civil Charges of the
Presidencies of
Bengal, Madras and
Bombay, from
1819-20 to 1826-27, and,
per Estimate, for 1827-28 and
1828-29:"
Also, "Returns of the Amount of Salaries and Emoluments of every Kind received by the several Officers
of His Majesty's Supreme Courts of Judicature at
Fort
William, Fort St. George, Bombay and
Prince of Wales's
Island, on an Average of Two or Three of the last
Years for which the Accounts can be made up, distinguishing the Amount of Salary from Fees and other
Emoluments; also of the Table of Fees sanctioned by
the Courts, and charged by the Officers, so far as the
same relate to the Supreme Court of Judicature at
Fort
William:"
Also, "An Account of the Per-centage at which the
several Heads of Revenue in
India are collected for
the Years included in the Papers presented to this
House on the 9th
February instant; distinguishing the
Presidencies, Conquered and Ceded Provinces:"
Also, "An Account of the Arrears and Balances left
annually due on the Land Revenue of
India for the
Years included in the said Papers:"
Also, "An Account in Detail for the same Period of
the Revenue and Charges of the Ceded and Conquered
Provinces, classed under Heads analogous to those introduced into the Accounts of the Presidencies:"
Also, "An Account of the Profit or Loss upon the
Trade of The
East India Company between
Europe
and
India, Europe and
China, India and
China, China
and the
North American Colonies, stating each separately, for the last Ten Years:"
Also, "Details of the several Heads of Revenue and
of Charge in the several Tables, No. 1. A, B and C,
in the printed Papers presented to this House on the
9th Day of
February instant, and also of those relating
to
Prince of Wales's Island and
St. Helena for the
Years 1809-10, 1817-18, 1827-28, stating under separate Heads the principal Items of Receipt and of
Expenditure:"
Also, "An Account of the several Sales of The
East
India Company from the Years 1822-23 up to the latest
Period, specifying the Quantity of each Kind of Tea
sold, the Average Price at which each Kind was put
up, and at which each Kind was sold at each Sale:"
Also, "An Account of the Rate of Freight
per Ton
paid by The
East India Company from
China, on the
Average of the whole Tonnage, from the Years
1822-23:"
Also, "An Account of the Quantity of Tea exported
by The
East India Company from
Canton, specifying
the several Kinds of Tea, and the Average Prime Cost
per Pound, in each Year, from the Year 1822-23 up to
the latest Period the same can be made out:"
Also, "An Account of the Expence of The
East
India Company's Establishment at
Canton, specifying
the Names of the Servants, and the Amount of Salaries
and Emoluments of each, and of the whole Cost for
the Maintenance of the same, in each Year, since
1822-23:"
Also, "An Account showing all other Charges, as well
in
China as in
England, incurred by The
East India
Company in their Trade with
China, including Freight,
and stating the actual Amount in each Year, from
1822-23:"
And also, "A Return of the Foreign Trade with
China,
distinguishing the different Nations, and the Trade
carried on by The
East India Company from that
carried on by Private
India Ships under the
British
Flag; also the Tonnage employed by each Nation,
and the principal Articles of Export and Import, as
far as the same can be ascertained, for the last Fifteen
Years."
East India Com
ee, Christian to attend:
Ordered, That
Hugh George Christian Esquire do
attend this House on
Wednesday the 4th of
March next,
to be sworn, in order to his being examined as a Witness
before the Select Committee appointed to enquire into
the present State of the Affairs of The
East India Company, and into the Trade between
Great Britain, the
East
Indies and
China.
Papers respecting the Trade with India & China referred to the Comee:
Ordered, That the several Papers relating to the Trade
with
India and
China, including Information respecting
the Consumption, Prices, &c. of Tea in Foreign Countries,
laid before the House on the 5th Day of
June 1829, be
referred to the last-mentioned Committee.
Report on the Subject referred to the Com
ee:
Ordered, That the Report (relative to the Trade with
the
East Indies and
China) from the Select Committee
appointed to enquire into the Means of extending and
securing the Foreign Trade of the Country, in the
Session 1821, together with the Minutes of Evidence
taken in the Sessions 1820 and 1821 before the said
Committee, be referred to the Select Committee appointed
to enquire into the present State of the Affairs of The
East India Company, and into the Trade between
Great
Britain, the
East Indies and
China.
Petition from Keighly referred to the Com
ee.
Ordered, That the Petition of the Land Owners,
Clergy, Merchants, Manufacturers and other Inhabitants
of the Town and Parish of
Keighly, in the West Riding
of the County of
York, whose Names are thereunto
subscribed, presented to the House on the 18th Day of
this instant
February, praying their Lordships "to throw
open the Trade with
China to all His Majesty's Subjects, and remove those Restrictions which prohibit
Englishmen from settling in the Territory of The
East
India Company," be referred to the last-mentioned
Committee.
Com
ee on the Coal Trade, Pearsall to attend.
Ordered, That
Charles Edward Pearsall, Principal Clerk
of the Coal Market, do attend this House To-morrow,
to be sworn, in order to his being examined as a Witness
before the Committee appointed to take into Consideration the State of the Coal Trade of the United
Kingdom, together with the Duties and Charges of all
Descriptions affecting the same, as well in the Port of
London as in the several other Ports of the United
Kingdom.
State of the Country, Motion for a Com
ee to consider, Negatived:
The Order of the Day being read for the Lords to be
summoned;
It was moved, "That this House do resolve itself into
a Committee of the Whole House, to consider the
internal State of the Country."
Which being objected to;
It was moved "to leave out from ("That") to the
End of the Motion, and insert ("a Select Committee
be appointed to enquire into the State of the Agriculture and Manufacture of the Kingdom, for the
Purpose of ascertaining whether any and what Relief
can be derived from an Extension of Foreign
Trade.")
After long Debate,
The proposed Amendment was (by Leave of the House)
withdrawn.
Then it was moved "to agree to the Motion as at
first proposed."
The Question was put thereupon?
It was resolved in the Negative.
Protest thereupon.
"
DISSENTIENT:
"1.-Because we are convinced that the Distress
which prevailed in this Kingdom at the Time of the
Commencement of the present Session of Parliament,
and which His Majesty must have been induced to
believe, and have been advised to represent to Parliament, as partial, was at that Period most severely felt
in almost all Parts of the Kingdom, and that it has
since increased, and continues to increase.
"2.-Because it has been stated to Parliament that the
Distress, so represented to be only partial, was to be
attributed to the Seasons, and to other Causes not
under Legislative Control; and the Representation so
made, whilst it states a self-evident Truth respecting
the Seasons, omits all Mention what such, the other
Causes of Distress, are, and Parliament therefore has
not the Means of ascertaining, without further Enquiry,
whether such other Causes are or are not under
Legislative Control.
"3.-Because we think that it is the Duty of this House
not to rest satisfied with respect to a Matter of such
Importance, without instituting a solemn Enquiry, in
order to ascertain what are the Causes which have
produced extreme Distress throughout the Kingdom,
or the greatest Part thereof; and whether that Distress can by any and what Legislative Measures be
removed or alleviated; and because it is, we conceive,
the Duty of Parliament, without any Delay, to the
utmost of its Power, by all just Means, to endeavor to
remove or alleviate it.
"4.-Because we think, that if it should be found,
upon satisfactory Enquiry, that the Causes of the
Distress cannot be removed, or the Distress be alleviated by the Legislature, His Majesty's Subjects will
not fail duly to appreciate the earnest Endeavours
of Parliament to relieve them, and that they will
cease to labour under an Aggravation of the Distress
occasioned by their present Belief, that, if the Distress
cannot be wholly removed, it may be materially alleviated, an Aggravation of Distress from which it may
be in the Power of Parliament to relieve them, by
ascertaining what are (other than the Seasons) the
Causes of the Distress, and whether such other Causes
are or are not under Legislative Control.
"Eldon.
"Stanhope.
"Northwick.
"Churchill.
"Teynham.
"Richmond & Lennox.
"Radnor."
Adjourn.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum
continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Veneris, vicesimum sextum diem instantis Februarii, horâ undecimâ
Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.