| 5 July 1600 |
| Entry | MA Cantab of 26 years' standing. Had been practising in London for 6 months. Had cured 20 or more people 'diversis gravioribus morbis laborantes'. Gave all kinds of medicine, but had no licence or authority. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | Asked to appear. |
| 3 Aug 1602 |
| Entry | Mr Tippar appeared to claim back £20 given in surety for A, who was still (?or again) in prison. |
| Action taken | None. Surety of £20 not returned. |
| 6 Aug 1602 |
| Entry | Mr Tippar again presented a petition on behalf of A, sending his ring by a servant. |
| Action taken | College to write to the Keeper to release A from prison. |
| 3 Aug 1604 |
| Entry | Dr Taylior accused A of treating Sir Edward Semor & his wife within the last 6-7 weeks, and also of making a woman's teeth fall out in the Poultry. Poe said that A had caused the death of Captain Lee. Dr Langton said that A had treated Mr Harris. (A was not present.) |
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Second initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Third initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| Number of crimes | 4 |
| 7 Nov 1606 |
| Entry | Thomas PATTENSON (566, qv), MA Cantab, told the President & Censors that A had given Mr Martin, priest, 'a chemical medicament' causing vomiting, diarrhoea and death. |
| Initiator of the complaint | other medical practitioner |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 9 Jan 1607 |
| Entry | Pattenson, Susan Martin & William Gylley accused A of causing the death of Martin of Gutter Lane. Martin had blamed A for his death, and A had declared that the cathartic medicament he'd used would either kill or cure - a final attempt. |
| Initiator of the complaint | other medical practitioner |
| Second initiator of the complaint | spouse of the patient |
| Third initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 3 July 1607 |
| Entry | Accused by Dr Pope. |
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 10 April 1609 |
| Entry | President announced 'many complaints' against A. |
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | See below. |
| 14 April 1609 |
| Entry | See the Book of Examinations. |
| Action taken | See E & see below. |
| 28 April 1609 |
| Entry | Summoned but did not appear, 'and we waited an hour'. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 3 Aug 1610 |
| Entry | Letter from A was brought to the President & Censors, together with 'a small printed book concerning the Aurum Potabile'. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | Both letter & book were handed to the Registrar. |
| 7 Nov 1600 |
| Entry | Appeared. Admitted 1 year's illegal practice incl 'medicamentum diaphoreticum, ex Auro et Argento vivo confectam. D. Magno Camerario: D. Spensero Eq. aurato: < Anthonio Pawlet eq. aur.' Examined in all parts of medicine & found inadequate in all. |
| Attitude of the accused | confessed |
| Pressure applied by College | yes |
| Action taken | Forbidden to practise. (`Praxis illi omnino interdictus.') |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Forbidden to practise |
| 3 May 1611 |
| Entry | A's Aurum Potabile was mentioned. He was called 'Dr Anthony'. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 16 Oct 1612 |
| Entry | President (MOUNDEFORD) made a list of 10 illicitly practising MDs, and selected 4 for indictment, incl. 'Dr Anthony' who was MD of 'our universities'. See also AIRE 9, BARKER 52, DEE 212. |
| Initiator of the complaint | college member |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | To be indicted. |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 18 April 1614 |
| Entry | A was discussed, together with other empirics. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | ? |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 13 Sep 1616 |
| Entry | A was discussed. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | To be indicted. |
| Verdict | case not completed |
| 5 Dec 1600 |
| Entry | Accused of practice on Colly in Coleman Street. |
| Action taken | Fined £5 and to be imprisoned in the Counter, Wood Street. |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Fined £5 and imprisoned |
| Number of crimes | 1 |
| 22 Dec 1600 |
| Entry | Let out of prison on letter from the Archbishop. |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Pressure applied by College | yes |
| Action taken | Letter to be written to the Archbishop. |
| 6 Feb 1601 |
| Entry | Submitted to the privilege of the College. Agreed to abide by their decisions & begged for more merciful treatment. Agreed to pay fine and 'went away quietly but was absolutely forbidden to practise'. |
| Attitude of the accused | submitted to the College |
| Action taken | To pay previous fine of £5 to Dr Forster (Treasurer) by 3 pm 7 Feb. |
| 6 May 1601 |
| Entry | Francis Anthony appeared again on a charge of practising. Indeed he confessed that he had given a pill to an epileptic: the same pill he had given to Paul Samond who was dead within three days. Because he had practised against the Statutes and against his promise, he wasa fined £5. As he refused to pay this fine he was committed to prison with a fine of £20. |
| Attitude of the accused | confessed |
| Action taken | Fined £5, refused to pay, imprisoned with fine of £20. |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Fined £5, refused to pay, imprisoned with fine of £20 |
| 5 Feb 1602 |
| Entry | 'It was decided with regard to Anthony that legal action should be taken.' |
| Attitude of the accused | absent |
| Action taken | College to take legal action against A. |
| 19 Feb 1602 |
| Entry | Confessed to practice for 3 years in London. Had lately treated Ward and Roger Cotton's servant, leaving one dead and the other dangerously ill. |
| Attitude of the accused | confessed |
| Action taken | [Must have been imprisoned - see below.] |
| Verdict | guilty |
| Sentence | Imprisoned |
| Number of crimes | 2 |
| 11 June 1602 |
| Entry | A's wife pleaded unsuccessfully for his release. |
| Action taken | Release refused. |