THE ECONOMY, 1841-70: REORIENTATION AND BOOM
From 1841 Chester enjoyed thirty boom years. The
main evidence is the extent of migration to the city, but
prosperity was reflected also in a large rise in the
number of businesses and in the amount of rebuilding
in the city centre. The arrival of the railways reasserted
Chester's importance for transport and consolidated its
function as a service centre for the region. A limited
growth in manufacturing further diversified the
economy.
Chester and its Region
The railway age in Chester began in 1840 with the
opening of lines to Birkenhead and Crewe. In the next
thirty years others were opened which fed traffic from
Shrewsbury, Bangor and Holyhead, Wrexham and
Ruabon, Oswestry and Welshpool, Mold, Warrington,
Rhyl and Denbigh, Llangollen and Corwen, and
Wirral. (fn. 3) By 1870 the city was a focal point in the
regional rail network. At first its connexions to north
and central Wales and the Marches were better than
those to the east. Although the lines to Crewe and
Warrington were opened comparatively early, no
others into south and central Cheshire appeared
before 1870. The early rail network thus reinforced
Chester's service function for Wales but possibly
weakened it in relation to the parts of Cheshire for
which there was better rail access to Manchester,
Warrington, Crewe, the Potteries, or Shrewsbury.
Estimating the effect of the railways on Chester is
not easy. The most obvious impact was as employers.
There were 311 people, all men, working on the
railways in Chester in 1851 and the number had risen
to 499 by 1861, all but five of whom were men. (fn. 4) That
represented at least 5.2 per cent of the male labour
force, and it is likely that the census understated railway
employment. (fn. 5) By 1861 the London and North Western
and Great Western Railways were the two biggest
employers in the city. About 100 porters were working
at Chester General station, (fn. 6) and there were at least 76
railway labourers in the city. (fn. 7) The majority, both skilled
and unskilled, had been born outside either Chester or
Cheshire, and many railway workers seem initially to
have come from an existing national pool of labour
rather than being local men newly trained. (fn. 8) Such
migrant workers added new spending power to the
Chester economy even though many were unskilled and
relatively poorly paid.
By improving Chester's links with its hinterland, the
railways enhanced prospects for at least some retailers.
Although surviving business records are biased towards
middle- and upper-class account customers and probably tend to overstate the city's regional influence, they
do provide some evidence of the distribution of
Chester's trade. The evidence can be linked to trends
in the wider region, and for that purpose the city's
hinterland can be divided into four main zones: Wales,
subdivided into industrial Flintshire, the Denbighshire
coalfield, the north Wales coastal resorts, and the rest
of north and mid Wales; Ellesmere Port and Wirral;
the rest of Cheshire; and elsewhere in the British Isles
(Tables 11-12).
The proportion of Chester's trade from north and
mid Wales seems to have grown markedly with the
opening of the railways to Shrewsbury and Holyhead,
and its balance also shifted. Before the arrival of the
railway, industrial Flintshire seems to have dominated
the Welsh trade, and it continued to be the most
important source, though its relative significance
declined. Industry in the county was past its peak
and the population of upland Flintshire fell during
the 1840s and 1850s. Only the coastal lowland grew
consistently, although Hawarden, Buckley, Hope, and
Treuddyn revived somewhat in the 1850s and 1860s. (fn. 1)
Trends overall in industrial Flintshire were thus not
propitious for Chester.
|
| TABLE 11: Source of account custom at Chester shops, 1844-1910 |
| Year shop | (No.) | Chester and suburbs | Probably Chester | North and mid Wales | Ellesmere Port and Wirral | Elsewhere in Cheshire | Elsewhere |
| 1844 Butt & Co. | (482) | 46.5 | 29.7 | 10.8 | 0.2 | 12.2 | 0.6 |
| 1854 Butt & Co. | (365) | 44.7 | 15.3 | 21.6 | 3.6 | 14.3 | 0.6 |
| 1864 Butt & Co. | (1,032) | 51.6 | 5.9 | 17.9 | 2.0 | 21.5 | 1.0 |
| 1874 Butt & Co. | (1,006) | 63.7 | 4.0 | 8.6 | 5.1 | 15.5 | 3.2 |
| 1884 Butt & Co. | (2,309) | 60.7 | 2.3 | 16.9 | 5.6 | 12.2 | 2.4 |
| 1895 Hendersons | (499) | 66.1 | - | 10.2 | 3.4 | 15.0 | 5.2 |
| 1900 Butt & Co. | (770) | 48.2 | - | 17.1 | 4.9 | 22.6 | 7.1 |
| 1910 Thos. Welsby | (362) | 65.8 | - | 8.3 | 4.1 | 16.6 | 5.3 |
Notes: The total numbers for Butt & Co. (jewellers) are transactions, the figures for 1900 being for Jan.-Apr. only; the total numbers
for Hendersons Ltd. (furnishers) and Thomas Welsby & Co. (wine merchants) are customers.
Sources: C.C.A.L.S., ZCR 92 (Butt & Co.); ZCR 95 (Thos. Welsby); ZCR 558 (Hendersons Ltd.).
|
| TABLE 12: Source of Welsh account custom at Chester shops, 1844-1910 |
| Year shop | (No.) | Industrial Flintshire | Denbighshire coalfield | North coast resorts | Elsewhere |
| 1844 Butt & Co. | (52) | 92.3 | - | - | 7.7 |
| 1854 Butt & Co. | (79) | 62.0 | 8.9 | 1.3 | 27.9 |
| 1864 Butt & Co. | (185) | 50.3 | 21.6 | 2.2 | 26.0 |
| 1874 Butt & Co. | (82) | 45.1 | 35.4 | 3.7 | 15.9 |
| 1884 Butt & Co. | (390) | 42.9 | 26.4 | 16.0 | 14.7 |
| 1895 Hendersons | (51) | 37.5 | 22.9 | 6.3 | 33.3 |
| 1900 Butt & Co. | (132) | 48.5 | 12.1 | 11.4 | 28.0 |
| 1910 Thos. Welsby | (30) | 43.3 | 6.7 | 30.0 | 20.0 |
Notes: The total numbers for Butt & Co. (jewellers) are transactions, the figures for 1900 being for Jan.-Apr. only; the total numbers
for Hendersons Ltd. (furnishers) and Thomas Welsby & Co. (wine merchants) are customers.
Sources: C.C.A.L.S., ZCR 92 (Butt & Co.); ZCR 95 (Thos. Welsby); ZCR 558 (Hendersons Ltd.).
The railway to Wrexham and Ruabon gave the
Denbighshire coalfield a new lease of life, (fn. 2) and seems
to have brought Chester an infusion of trade. By the
1870s the Denbighshire trade was beginning to rival
that from Flintshire. There was much migration into
the area, the population rising by 65 per cent between
1841 and 1871. The danger for Chester was that
Wrexham was becoming a significant centre in its
own right, (fn. 3) while the railways also enhanced the
drawing power of Shrewsbury and even Oswestry.
Chester's trade from the resorts of the north Wales
coast seems to have been small, though growing.
Limited development of sea bathing at Prestatyn,
Rhyl, Abergele, Colwyn Bay, and Llandudno predated the railway, but even after its opening such
development was modest before 1871. (fn. 4) Rural north
Wales enjoyed a period of considerable prosperity
between 1850 and 1880, and the railways seem to
have increased Chester's trade from that area. (fn. 5)
In rural Cheshire developments in agriculture evidently worked strongly in Chester's favour, and trade
from there apparently grew in both absolute and
relative terms. The county was surrounded by growing
urban areas to the north, south-east, and west, and the
agricultural economy during the 19th century became
closely tied to supplying the demands of a vast urban
market. (fn. 6) Changes in farming to accommodate those
demands reached a crucial phase around mid century,
the key being improved accessibility to markets brought
about by the expanding rail network. Cheese became
relatively less important but its sale price seems to have
risen from the 1830s to a peak c. 1860. Liquid milk
increasingly replaced cheese from the 1840s, and
market garden produce was also more important in
the Chester area, though some of the development predated the railway. Farm productivity improved, rents
rose, and rent arrears fell. All the indicators suggest an
increasingly prosperous rural economy.
Chester's position as the main regional centre in
west Cheshire was strengthened by the closure of other
local produce markets. Neston, Malpas, Over, and
Frodsham disappeared between 1834 and 1860,
though the failure of the last was attributed to Warrington rather than Chester. (fn. 7) Tarporley followed after
1860. The effect was to give Chester a wider monopoly,
though the benefits were increasingly offset by the
growth of farm-gate sales direct to middlemen. (fn. 8)
Although Chester's rural hinterland became generally more prosperous, wealth was not evenly distributed. Prospects for farm labourers probably worsened
as farms became more capital-intensive and as liquid
milk became more important at the expense of crops
demanding more, if seasonal, labour. Farm labourers
were forced off the land, and in Cheshire as a whole
their number fell by 17.1 per cent between 1851 and
1871. Many people left the area east and south-east of
Chester, where the population stagnated at c. 17,000. (fn. 9)
The boom in Chester probably created some unskilled
jobs for such rural migrants.
The railway into Wirral seems to have increased the
peninsula's significance in Chester's trade. The city's
influence, however, evidently reached no further than a
line running from Parkgate to Eastham. Beyond that
the pull of Liverpool and the growing commercial
weight of Birkenhead were too strong. (fn. 10) The railways
also brought more long-distance tourists and customers to Chester, but although the trade from outside
the immediate hinterland grew, it remained a relatively
small proportion of the total.
Retailing and Services
Chester's booming economy in the early railway age
offered new opportunities to its shops and other
services. Between 1840 and 1878 the number of
businesses rose by 46 per cent (Table 13). There were
also changes in the balance between sectors. Suppliers
of the basic needs of food and clothing fell from 63 per
cent of the total to 53 per cent, while those associated
with the growth and broadening of consumer spending
power increased in importance. The household goods
trades, including consumer durables such as furniture,
rose to 9 per cent of businesses, while the number of
people offering financial, professional, and sales services nearly trebled. The last feature indicates how
Chester's role as a service centre was being strengthened. The number of accountants, solicitors, auctioneers, and property agents increased markedly, and
there was a dramatic rise in the number of insurance
agents. Chester's role as a printing and publishing centre was enhanced and new trades emerged, including such specialists as seven photographers, a bird
dealer, and art dealer, and a taxidermist.
|
| TABLE 13: Chester businesses, 1840, 1878, and 1906 |
|---|
|
Business categories | 1840 | 1878 | 1906 |
| Food, Drink, and Tobacco | 610 | 772 | 783 |
| 41% | 36% | 38% |
| Corn Millers, Maltsters, and Dealers | 36 | 25 | 15 |
| Shopkeepers, Provision Dealers, and Grocers | 221 | 359 | 334 |
| Butchers, Fishmongers, and Fried Fish Dealers | 57 | 77 | 93 |
| Wine and Spirit Dealers | 30 | 19 | 15 |
| Brewers | 15 | 10 | 1 |
| Inns, Beer Retailers, Hotels, and Eating Houses | 230 | 237 | 224 |
| Tobacco and Snuff Manufacturers | - | 7 | 5 |
| Tobacconists and Newsagents | 7 | 25 | 48 |
| Miscellaneous | 14 | 13 | 48 |
| Textiles, Clothing, and Dress | 331 | 370 | 320 |
| 22% | 17% | 16% |
| Mercers and Drapers | 30 | 65 | 44 |
| Clothes Dealers and Outfitters | 9 | 11 | 24 |
| Tailors, Dressmakers, and Milliners | 108 | 148 | 95 |
| Hatters and Hosiers | 30 | 51 | 27 |
| Boot and Shoe Makers, Shops, and Repairers | 107 | 59 | 76 |
| Hairdressers and Perfumers | 25 | 17 | 41 |
| Miscellaneous | 22 | 19 | 13 |
| Household Goods | 100 | 191 | 176 |
| 7% | 9% | 9% |
| Glass, China, and Cutlery Dealers | 11 | 18 | 15 |
| Furniture Dealers | 12 | 10 | 24 |
| Hardware Dealers and Ironmongers | 18 | 35 | 26 |
| Tallow, Oil, Candle, and Soap Dealers | 10 | 18 | 8 |
| Coal Merchants | 9 | 28 | 47 |
| Druggists and Chemists | 14 | 25 | 26 |
| Miscellaneous Household Goods Retailers | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Other Household Goods Manufacturers | 22 | 52 | 24 |
| Printing, Books, and Specialist Trades | 81 | 134 | 142 |
| 6% | 6% | 7% |
| Bookbinders | 11 | 8 | 7 |
| Printers and Publishers | 17 | 30 | 24 |
| Booksellers and Stationers | 18 | 35 | 31 |
| Watchmakers, Jewellers, and Goldsmiths | 17 | 16 | 20 |
| Antique Furniture Dealers | - | - | 4 |
| Artists | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Art Furnisher | - | - | 1 |
| Art Metal Workers | - | - | 3 |
| Bird Dealers | - | 1 | 3 |
| Dealers in Works of Art | - | 1 | 3 |
| Designer, Draughtsman, and Illuminator | - | 1 | - |
| Fishing Tackle Dealers | - | 3 | - |
| Gunmakers and Gunsmiths | 3 | - | 2 |
| Heraldic Stationer | - | - | 1 |
| Music and Musical Instrument Sellers | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Organ Builders | - | 1 | 2 |
| Photographers | - | 7 | 13 |
| Pianoforte Makers and Tuners | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Picture Cleaner and Restorer | - | - | 1 |
| Picture Frame Makers | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Plaster Figure Maker | - | 1 | - |
| Sculptors | - | 1 | 1 |
| Taxidermists | - | 1 | 1 |
| Toy Dealers | - | 8 | - |
| Finance, Professional, Sales, and Service | 114 | 338 | 320 |
| 8% | 16% | 16% |
| Banking Companies | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| Pawnbrokers | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Accountants | 5 | 19 | 24 |
| Solicitors and Barristers | 26 | 41 | 56 |
| Stockbrokers | - | 2 | 3 |
| Auctioneers | 4 | 8 | 15 |
| Insurance Agents and Companies | 23 | 119 | 38 |
| House and Estate Agents | 4 | 42 | 18 |
| Building Societies | - | - | 4 |
| Agents and Commercial Travellers | 13 | 57 | 39 |
| Company Head and Local Offices | - | - | 18 |
| Medical Professions | 27 | 27 | 74 |
| Servants' Registry Offices | 1 | 7 | 10 |
| Bill Posters | - | 4 | 2 |
| Building and Construction | 122 | 224 | 168 |
| 8% | 10% | 8% |
| Building Trades | 102 | 154 | 134 |
| Architects, Surveyors, and Civil Engineers | 10 | 30 | 24 |
| Builders' Merchants and Timber Merchants | 10 | 40 | 10 |
| Road and Water Transport | 67 | 80 | 99 |
| 5% | 4% | 5% |
| Carters, Cab Owners, Coach Owners, and Stables | 14 | 38 | 38 |
| Horse Transport Construction and Repair | 44 | 24 | 31 |
| Cycle Dealers and Makers | - | - | 14 |
| Motor Vehicle Dealers, Makers, and Repairers | - | - | 5 |
| Water Transport Businesses | 9 | 18 | 11 |
| Miscellaneous Manufactures | 61 | 54 | 28 |
| 4% | 3% | 1% |
| Boot Tree and Last Maker | - | 1 | - |
| Brass Founders | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Braziers and Tinplate Workers | 12 | 14 | 6 |
| Manufacturing Chemists | 3 | 3 | - |
| Coopers | 7 | 3 | 1 |
| Electrical Engineers | - | - | 5 |
| General, Mechanical, and Hydraulic Engineers | - | 8 | 7 |
| Filter Manufacturer | 1 | - | - |
| Ironfounders | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Lead Manufacturer | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Nail Makers | 8 | - | - |
| Oil Sheet Maker | - | - | 1 |
| Roman Cement and Plaster of Paris Manufacturer | 1 | - | - |
| Rope and Twine Manufacturers | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| Surgical Instrument Maker | - | 1 | 1 |
| Tanners | 7 | 2 | - |
| Whitesmiths and Bellhangers | 8 | 7 | 2 |
| Total Businesses | 1,479 | 2,163 | 2,036 |
Notes: Tobacco and snuff manufacturers not listed separately in
1840.
Sources: Parry's Dir. Chester (1840); Cassey's Dir. Chester (1878);
Kelly's Dir. Ches. (1906).
There was also growth in the size and turnover of
individual businesses. Browns was highly successful,
buying further premises in 1856 and opening a new
building in Eastgate Street in 1858. In the 1860s the
firm diversified into furniture and furnishing fabrics,
for which the premises were enlarged again in 1869
and a furniture factory was opened in Newgate Street. (fn. 1)
The deposits of the Chester Savings Bank increased by
15 per cent between 1847 and 1867, and the bank's
success was expressed in its new premises in Grosvenor
Street, opened in 1853. (fn. 2) Chester's most luxurious
hotel, the Grosvenor, was built on the site of the old
Royal Hotel between 1863 and 1866. (fn. 3) The rebuilding
of other city-centre premises also testified to the city's
economic vitality. (fn. 4) Part of the boom in all those areas
can be attributed to the tourists and other visitors
whom the railways brought to the city in increasing
numbers. (fn. 5)
Industry
Manufacturing and craft employment remained a very
important element of Chester's economy in the mid
19th century (Tables 14-15). While service employment, especially domestic service, predominated for
women, for men the largest sector was manufacturing
and craft employment. Such jobs increased in importance during Chester's boom. Though the trend
between 1841 and 1871 was rather uneven (due in
part to the unreliability of the 1841 figures), between
1851 and 1861 the proportion of males employed in
manufacturing and crafts rose from 28.5 per cent to
31.5 per cent and the actual numbers by a fifth from
2,490 to 2,991, covering all the main trades. Mid 19thcentury Chester thus provides clear evidence that the
industrial revolution did not destroy local, small-scale
craft and workshop production even in a region which
was in the forefront of industrialization; for a time,
indeed, it increased.
Some traditional handicraft activities grew during
the mid 19th century, a reflection of the growing
population and an increased demand which could
not, as yet, be satisfied fully by factory products
made in the industrial centres. The most important
trades were tailoring and shoemaking. Both occupied a
blurred area between retailing and manufacturing,
since many tailors and shoemakers sold what they
made directly to the public. Many, on the other
hand, were probably outworkers working either for
middlemen wholesalers or directly for retailers
(Table 16). (fn. 6) For every one shoemaker and tailor in
business on his own account, there were thus several
others working as family members or outworkers.
Certain other trades in the traditional sector also
showed a modest increase in employment from 1851
to 1871 but others declined, probably as victims of the
increasing centralization and mechanization of production aided by the railways. Tanning, for example,
retained barely a foothold, the number of tanneries
dropping from seven to two. The closure of at least
two was probably linked to their poor location behind
the shops and businesses of Foregate Street and Brook
Street. (fn. 7) Chester's breweries reached their peak and then
began to decline. The brewery in Lower Bridge Street
closed c. 1858, (fn. 8) and a fall in the number of public-house
breweries was due probably to growing competition
from the larger firms. The Eaton family sold the Northgate brewery in 1864 to a partnership which developed
it into the city's predominant brewing concern. (fn. 9)
Steam milling along the canal side expanded, peaking in the late 19th century. Milton Street (Cestrian)
Mill was erected in the 1850s, (fn. 10) and Albion Mill in
Seller Street by John Wiseman in 1868-9. (fn. 11) The
expansion reflected agricultural prosperity and the
economies of scale in large steam-powered plants
located alongside cheap water transport. (fn. 12) The Dee
Mills were becoming outmoded by those developments, but were rebuilt after a fire in 1847. (fn. 13)
Modest growth in manufacturing related to road
transport was offset by the end of shipbuilding in
Chester. The Roodee (or River Dee) yard changed
hands twice in the 1850s. The final occupier, Cox
and Miller of Liverpool, provided a dramatic finale
between 1857 and 1869 by launching a succession of
large iron sailing ships from the yard. The slump of the
late 1860s ended the shipbuilding boom, however, and
in 1869 the yard was closed. The site was used for the
new gasworks. (fn. 14)
The leadworks continued to grow and prosper.
Additions were made to the white lead stacks between
1840 and 1871 which made it into a very large plant,
and acetic acid production for the white lead process
began in 1844. By 1870 there were eight retorts. The
site was enlarged in 1854 to over 16 acres, and a sheet
mill was transferred to Chester from Bagillt (Flints.) in
1855. (fn. 15)
|
| Table 14: Employment structure, 1841-1911 |
|---|
| A. MALES | |
| Occupational class | 1841
% | 1851
% | 1861
% | 1871
% | 1901
% | 1911
% |
| Agriculture and Fishing | 5.4 | 12.4 | 10.3 | 8.1 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Mining and Quarrying | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Building and Construction | 9.6 | 11.0 | 11.8 | 14.4 | 13.1 | 10.7 |
| Manufacturing and Crafts | 31.9 | 28.5 | 31.5 | 30.4 | 26.5 | 26.1 |
| Transport | 4.0 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 8.9 | 16.8 | 16.6 |
| Dealing and Shopkeeping | 12.6 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 12.2 | 12.4 | 14.1 |
| Finance and Insurance | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Public Service and Professional | 7.2 | 10.5 | 7.0 | 8.2 | 9.2 | 10.4 |
| Domestic Service | 4.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 3.3 |
| Labourers (Unspecified) | 14.7 | 7.0 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 6.2 | 4.4 |
| Propertied and Independent | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
| Indefinite | 4.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Total Employed | 6,752 | 8,750 | 9,506 | 8,925 | 12,000 | 12,604 |
| B. FEMALES | |
| Occupational class | 1841
% | 1851
% | 1861
% | 1871
% | 1901
% | 1911
% |
| Agriculture and Fishing | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| Mining and Quarrying | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Building and Construction | - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Manufacturing and Crafts | 14.2 | 21.1 | 23.1 | 21.8 | 21.8 | 17.5 |
| Transport | - | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Dealing and Shopkeeping | 6.6 | 10.4 | 9.4 | 15.4 | 12.5 | 19.3 |
| Finance and Insurance | - | - | - | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 |
| Public Service and Professional | 2.3 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 6.4 | 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Domestic Service | 49.0 | 52.2 | 50.7 | 44.9 | 44.6 | 42.3 |
| Labourers (Unspecified) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - |
| Propertied and Independent | 20.6 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 8.7 |
| Indefinite | 7.0 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Total Employed | 3,237 | 4,420 | 5,230 | 3,818 | 5,758 | 6,017 |
| C. TOTAL WORKING POPULATION | |
| Occupational class | 1841
% | 1851
% | 1861
% | 1871
% | 1901
% | 1911
% |
| Agriculture and Fishing | 3.7 | 8.4 | 7.1 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Mining and Quarrying | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Building and Construction | 6.5 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 10.1 | 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Manufacturing and Crafts | 26.1 | 26.0 | 28.5 | 27.8 | 25.0 | 23.3 |
| Transport | 2.7 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 11.6 | 11.5 |
| Dealing and Shopkeeping | 10.7 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 13.2 | 12.4 | 15.8 |
| Finance and Insurance | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 4.9 |
| Public Service and Professional | 5.6 | 8.2 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Domestic Service | 18.8 | 19.2 | 19.6 | 15.4 | 16.0 | 15.9 |
| Labourers (Unspecified) | 10.1 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 3.0 |
| Propertied and Independent | 8.8 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| Indefinite | 5.5 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Total Employed | 9,989 | 13,170 | 14,736 | 12,743 | 17,758 | 18,621 |
Note: 1841 includes all employed regardless of age, but there are flaws in the Census occupation data; 1851 and 1861 include all
employed regardless of age; 1871 includes employed people aged 20 and over; 1901 and 1911 include employed people aged 10 and
over.
Source: Census, 1841-71, 1901-11, Occupations, Chester.
|
| TABLE 15: Adult manufacturing employment, 1851-1911,by 1911 Census classifications |
| Sector | Males | Females | Total |
| 1851 | 1871 | 1911 | 1851 | 1871 | 1911 | 1851 | 1871 | 1911 |
| A. Traditional and Handicraft Sector | |
| Precious Metals, Jewels, Watches, etc. | 29 | 66 | 75 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 34 | 77 | 76 |
| Cabinet Makers and Upholsterers | 123 | 136 | 131 | 20 | 32 | 18 | 143 | 154 | 149 |
| Other Furniture Workers | 18 | 19 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 19 | 48 |
| Wood and Bark | 172 | 187 | 63 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 175 | 187 | 64 |
| Skins and Leather | 68 | 71 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 68 | 74 | 6 |
| Hair and Feathers | 22 | 11 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 12 | 24 |
| Tailors, Milliners, and Dressmakers | 229 | 252 | 250 | 498 | 528 | 530 | 727 | 780 | 780 |
| Shirt Makers | 0 | 0 | 1 | 63 | 100 | 21 | 63 | 100 | 22 |
| Footwear | 376 | 444 | 147 | 64 | 61 | 10 | 440 | 505 | 157 |
| Other Dress | 33 | 17 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 46 | 22 | 8 |
| Bread etc. | 118 | 162 | 110 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 135 | 168 | 114 |
| Other Food and Drink | 51 | 82 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 51 | 82 | 104 |
| Tobacco Manufacturers (incl. Pipes) | 19 | 47 | 68 | 3 | 13 | 83 | 22 | 60 | 151 |
| Spirituous Drinks | 75 | 63 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75 | 66 | 20 |
| Bookbinders and Paper | 41 | 22 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 41 | 29 | 17 |
| Printers and Lithographers | 64 | 66 | 134 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 64 | 68 | 138 |
| Total | 1,438 | 1,645 | 1,177 | 686 | 772 | 701 | 2,124 | 2,434 | 1,878 |
| 68% | 61% | 43% | 98% | 93% | 97% | 75% | 69% | 54% |
| B. Transport-Related Crafts | |
| Ships and Boats | 44 | 69 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 69 | 94 |
| Cycles and Motor Cars | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| Other Vehicle Workers | 107 | 137 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 137 | 180 |
| Blacksmiths and Strikers | 105 | 133 | 115 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 106 | 133 | 115 |
| Saddlery and Harness | 31 | 29 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 30 | 34 |
| Total | 287 | 368 | 471 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 290 | 370 | 473 |
| 14% | 14% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 10% | 10% | 14% |
| C. Metals and Other Modern Manufactures | |
| Iron, Steel, etc. | 58 | 144 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 144 | 44 |
| General Engineering and Machine Making | 129 | 262 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 129 | 262 | 185 |
| Tools, Dies, and Miscellaneous (incl. Leadworks) | 130 | 204 | 567 | 6 | 38 | 5 | 136 | 242 | 572 |
| Electrical Apparatus | 0 | 0 | 139 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 139 |
| Bricks, Cement, etc. | 4 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 29 |
| Oil, Grease, and Soap | 28 | 28 | 81 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 30 | 81 |
| Chemicals | 17 | 16 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 17 | 45 |
| Textiles | 33 | 44 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 7 | 41 | 60 | 15 |
| Total | 399 | 699 | 1,092 | 14 | 61 | 18 | 417 | 735 | 1,110 |
| 19% | 26% | 40% | 2% | 7% | 3% | 15% | 21% | 32% |
| Total | 2,124 | 2,712 | 2,740 | 703 | 834 | 721 | 2,831 | 3,546 | 3,461 |
| D. Other General and Undefined Workers possibly in Manufacturing | |
| General Labourers | 541 | 830 | 507 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 548 | 834 | 507 |
| Engine Drivers (not Transport) | 0 | 2 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 68 |
| Others | 2 | 24 | 70 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 2 | 51 | 87 |
| Total | 543 | 905 | 645 | 7 | 31 | 17 | 550 | 936 | 662 |
Source: Census, 1851, 1871, 1911, Occupations, Chester.
| | |
| TABLE 16: Self-employed and employees in
shoemaking and tailoring, 1860-1 |
|
Employment type | Shoemakers | Tailors |
| Total | 689 | 290 |
| Self-employed and middlemen | 91 | 59 |
| Employees and outworkers | 598 | 231 |
| Employees per self-employed | 6.6 | 3.9 |
Sources: Total: Census, 1861, Occupations, Chester; Selfemployed and middlemen: White's Dir. Ches. (1860); Employees
and outworkers calculated by deducting self-employed and
middlemen from total.
The railways could have helped the development of
new industries in Chester by reducing the cost of raw
materials and making access to markets cheaper or
faster. Although there is some evidence for such
railway-led industrialization, especially in the emergence of Saltney as an industrial suburb, the city's
manufacturing base remained limited. The engineering
sector grew most, and the numbers employed in metalworking increased greatly between 1851 and 1871,
particularly in the more modern trades. Older metal
trades, such as nailmaking and whitesmithing, declined,
presumably due to competition from elsewhere, but
engineers, machine makers, mechanics, and iron manufacturers leapt in numbers. In 1850 there were only three
engineering enterprises. (fn. 1) One was Edward and Bryan
Johnson, successors to Cole, Whittle & Co. at the
Flookersbrook foundry. By the 1860s the firm had
diversified into general engineering, machining, and
boilermaking, and E. B. Ellington entered the partnership, bringing expertise in hydraulic engineering. (fn. 2)
The other two engineering firms operating in 1850
appear to have had contrasting fortunes. John Gray &
Co., Roodee Iron Works, had disappeared by 1860, (fn. 3)
but it is unclear whether it was swallowed up by the
revived shipyard or was too poorly located to make
efficient use of rail transport. The foundry in Crook
Street had changed hands by 1860 but survived as a
back-street enterprise beyond 1870. More significantly,
by 1860 five new firms had emerged and by 1870 a
further three, making eleven in all. (fn. 4) The new foundries
and engineering firms were located in two main areas.
The first lay between the canal and the railway around
Brook Street, Egerton Street, and George Street, where
the most important businesses were E. & B. Johnson,
James Mowle, and James Rigg. None was actually on
the canal side itself or had direct rail access, and most
occupied restricted sites hemmed in by housing which
limited their possibility for expansion. The two railway
wagon repair shops in the same area were linked of
necessity to the railway. The London and North
Western Railway had a cramped works between Francis Street and City Road, to which rail access involved
crossing the station approach road at street level. (fn. 5) The
Birmingham Wagon Co.'s works occupied a better and
more spacious site between Black Diamond Street and
the Brook Street bridge. The company's main works
was in Smethwick near Birmingham, and the branch in
Chester maintained wagons leased to the railway companies and private operators. (fn. 6)
The new industrial zone at Saltney was related
directly to the arrival of the railway. Though administratively it was only partly within Chester, geographically and economically Saltney was an extension of the
city. It developed rapidly into the city's most vibrant
industrial area in the mid 19th century and made a
large contribution to diversifying Chester's economic
base. The trigger for its growth was the opening by the
Shrewsbury and Chester Railway in 1846 of a wharf on
the Dee adjacent to the railway junction with the
Chester and Holyhead line. (fn. 7) Industrial development
began in 1847 with the establishment of Henry Wood
& Co.'s anchor, chain, and general engineering works.
The firm had been founded in Stourbridge (Worcs.) in
1786. The Saltney works, on Boundary Lane, had both
a railway siding and access to Saltney wharf. A number
of other firms followed Wood's to Saltney. Lloyd's
Cambrian Chain and Anchor Testing Co., symbiotically related to Woods, was set up next door in 1866. (fn. 8)
By 1870 three oil refineries were in operation, of which
the largest was the Flintshire Oil & Cannel Co. at St.
David's Oil Works. The others were E. S. Rogers &
Co.'s British Oil Works and the Dee Mineral Oil Co.,
set up in 1869. They mostly processed crude oil
produced from cannel coal in the Flintshire coalfield,
and were part of an industry which boomed locally
from 1858 to the 1880s. (fn. 9) The Sal Ammonionic works
was operating in Saltney as early as 1843, and in 1856
Proctor and Ryland moved there from Birmingham
and opened a bone manure works on the riverside. (fn. 10)
The railway also brought industry to Saltney on its own
account. The Shrewsbury and Chester Railway established its locomotive and carriage works there in 1847,
and after the company was acquired by the Great
Western in 1854, the latter moved its standard-gauge
carriage and wagon works from Wolverhampton to
Saltney. (fn. 11) The Victoria Waggon Co. was also operating
at Saltney by 1860, though it had closed by 1870.
Furthermore the goods yards at Mold Junction became
the main concentration and distribution point for
roofing slates from the north Wales quarries. (fn. 1) Saltney's
population grew from 554 in 1841 to 1,901 in 1871 as
a result of the area's industrial development. (fn. 2)
The mid 19th century was Chester's most successful
period between 1762 and 1914. Much of the success
can be attributed to the arrival of the railway, which
created direct employment and strengthened links with
the hinterland and beyond. The service economy
prospered, and there was growth and diversification
in manufacturing. By 1870 the city had managed to
reorientate to a significant degree after the demise of
many of its traditional functions in the eighty years
before 1840. The limitations of the reorientation were,
however, revealed after 1871.