Jovis, 2 die Januarii;
Primo Gulielmi et Mariæ, Anno Dom. 1689.
Prayers.
Southampton Return amended.
THE House being acquainted, That the Clerk of the
Crown attended at the Door, to amend the Return
for the Town and County of Southampton;
He was called in; and amended the Return accordingly,
by striking out the Name of * Fleming, Esquire, and
inserting the Name of Sir Charles Windham.
And thereupon Sir Charles Windham was introduced
into the House, according to the usual Custom.
Privilege.
A Complaint being made to the House, That one Aaron
Atkins hath arrested, and keeps in Custody, Nicholas Kendall, a Servant of Walter Kendall, Esquire, a Member of
this House, in Breach of the Privileges of the House;
Ordered, That it be referred to the Committee of Privileges and Elections, to examine the Matter; and report
the same, with their Opinions therein, to the House.
Batson's Estate.
A Bill to enable Wm. Batson, Esquire, to sell Lands in
the County of Oxford; and to settle an Estate in the County
of Suffolke to the same Uses; was read the Second time.
Resolved, That the Bill be committed to Sir John Barker,
Sir John Moreton, Sir John Fowell, Sir Tho. Clarges, Mr.
Glemham, Sir Walt. Young, Sir Tho. Littleton, Mr. Rebow,
Sir Fra. Guybon, Sir Rob. Rich. Sir Tho. Barnadiston, Mr.
Wharton, Sir Wm. Ellis, Sir Cha. Bloys, Mr. Fuller, Mr.
Fenwick, Mr. Christy, Mr. Freke, Mr. Etterick, Sir Math.
Andrews, Sir Cha. Raleigh, Sir Cha. Windham, Mr. Hunt,
Sir John Brownlow, Sir John Guise, Mr. Blowfeild, and all
the Members that serve for the County of Suffolke: And
they are to meet To-morrow in the Afternoon at Three
of the Clock, in the Speaker's Chamber: And they are
impowered to send for Persons, Papers, and Records.
Supply Bill; Duty on Coffee.
A Bill for laying a Duty upon Coffee, Tea, and Chocolate, at the Custom-house, was read the First time.
Resolved, That the Bill be read a Second time Tomorrow Morning.
Leave of Absence.
Ordered, That Mr. Sands have Leave to be absent in
the Country a Fortnight.
Reversing Walcott's Attainder.
Sir Thomas Littleton reports from the Committee to
whom the Bill for annulling the Attainder of Thomas Walcutt, Gentleman, was referred, and to whom the Petition
of the Countess of Roscomon was also referred, That they
had heard Counsel on both Sides: And that some Dispute
arising, which Side should be first heard, it was resolved
by the Committee, That the Petitioners Counsel should
be first heard, What Reasons they had to give against the
passing the Bill, before the Committee could proceed upon
the Bill itself.
That the Petitioner's Counsel did insist principally upon
a Grant made by King Charles the Second to the Petitioner's late Husband, of the Estate of Captain Tho.
Walcott, attainted and executed for High Treason: Which
Estate was settled afterwards upon the Petitioner, by her
said Husband, as Part of her Jointure: All which was admitted by the Counsel for the Bill; so that neither the said
Grant nor Settlement were produced to the Committee.
That the Petitioner's Counsel likewise said something
in relation to an Agreement made between the Petitioner,
and the Son of the said Captain Walcot; but made no
Proof of the same.
That the Petitioner's Counsel urged much, That if there
was no illegal Return of Jurors, nor undue Construction
of Law, in the Case of Captain Tho. Walcott; that then,
the Inducement to the said Bill failing, there would be
consequently no Reason for passing the said Bill.
That, in order to prove there was no undue Construction
of Law, the Counsel for the Petitioner said, Captain
Walcott was indicted for conspiring the Death of the
King, which was a plain Species of Treason within the
25 Edw. IIId.
But, being asked for the Indictment they had it not to
produce, nor any Copy thereof examined; although Mr.
Tanner, who keeps the said Record, was summoned to
attend.
That there was no illegal Return of Jurors: The Counsel for the Petitioner produced Mr. Trotman and Mr.
Normansell, the Two Secondaries of the Compters.
They both informed the Committee, That the Jury
which passed upon Captain Walcott, were taken out of the
same Panel with my Lord Russell's Jury.
That Sir Dudley North, then Sheriff, sent him the said
Panel, with Orders under his Hand to return the same.
That, being asked, If that was the usual Custom to receive Panels from the High Sheriff with such Directions,
they both answered, Formerly the Sheriffs themselves did
not intermeddle in the Return of Juries, but left it to their
Secondaries; until about Two Years before that time it
had been otherwise; and that it began in Bethell and
Cornishe's Time.
That, being asked, Whether the Jury that passed upon
Walcot were Freeholders, the Names of them being read
at the Table; they severally answered, They did not
know them to be so: But they said, It had been usual
in the City of London to return sufficient Men, without
Respect to their Freehold.
That the Counsel for the Bill insisted, That this House
being possessed of an ingrossed Bill from the Lords, where
the Matter had been already examined, that therefore they
were not bound to prove the Inducement to the Bill.
But that they did, however, produce Two Witnesses,
Mr. Rutland and Mr. Man: Who both informed the
Committee, That they were Two of Mr. Walcott's Jury
that passed upon him: And being asked, if they were
at that time Freeholders; they both answered in the
Negative.
That the Counsel for the Bill said, If the Committee
were satisfied with the Petitioner's Reasons against the
Bill, they must submit the Matter; only, if the Bill did
pass, they saw no Reason why Mr. Walcot's Estate should
not be, by Consequence, restored.
So the Counsel withdrew.
And that, after Debate, the Question being put, That
the Petitioner's Counsel had given sufficient Reason against
passing the Bill;
It passed in the Negative, That they had not.
And that thereupon the Committee proceeded, and
passed the Bill without any Amendments.
Resolved, That the Bill be re-committed to the same
Committee: And they are to meet this Afternoon.
Restoring Corporations.
Mr. Solicitor General reports from the Committee
to whom the Bill for restoring Corporations was referred,
That they had agreed upon several Amendments to be
made to the Bill, and several Clauses to be added thereunto: Which he read in his Place, with the Coherence;
and afterwards, delivered the same in at the Clerk's Table:
Where the same were once read throughout; and afterwards a Second time, one by one: And, with some Amendments proposed and agreed upon, and made at the Table
accordingly, the same were, upon the Question severally
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House.
A Proviso was offered to be made Part of the Bill, That
the Bill shall not extend to the Town and Corporation of
Nottingham: Which was twice read; and, upon the
Question put thereupon, agreed unto by the House.
Another Proviso was offered to be made Part of the
Bill, That this Bill shall not extend to the City of Hereford:
And the Question being put, That the said Proviso be
read;
The House divided.
The Yeas go forth.
|
|
|
| Tellers for the Yeas, |
Mr. Paul Foley, |
127. |
| Sir Mat. Andrews, |
| Tellers for the Noes, |
Sir John Dorrell, |
118. |
| Mr. Smith, |
So it was resolved in the Affirmative.
The Clause was read the First time:
And the Question being put, That the Clause be read
the Second time;
It passed in the Negative.
Another Proviso was offered, That nothing in the Bill
should extend to confirm any Grant or Lease made without Impeachment of Waste of any Lands belonging to
the Borough of Malmesbury by Colour or Pretence of
any new Charter, granted by King James the Second to
the said Borough: Which was twice read; and agreed
unto by the House.
Another Proviso was offered to be made Part of the
Bill, That nothing in this Bill, other than the Clause
touching the not tendering, taking, or subscribing the
Oath and Declaration, shall extend to the Corporation of
the City of London, or any the Companies thereof; but
the same are wholly excepted thereout; any thing to the
contrary thereof notwithstanding.
Resolved, That the Clause be read a Second time.
The Clause was read the Second time.
Resolved, That the Clause be made Part of the Bill.
A Clause was offered to be made Part of the Bill, that
whereas it is necessary for the sake of publick Justice, and
securing the Government for the future, that such open Attempts upon the Constitution, and so notorious Violations
of Oaths and Trusts, should not go wholly unpunished, lest
hereafter ill Men might be encouraged to the like Guilt, in
hopes to come off with Impunity, though they should fail
of Success: Be it therefore Enacted, by the Authority aforesaid, That every Mayor, Recorder, Alderman, Steward,
Sheriff, Common Councilman, Town Clerk, Magistrate, or
Officer, who, without the Consent of the greatest Number
of the respective Body Corporate, City, Town, Borough,
or Cinque Port, whereof he was a Member previously declared, did take upon him to consent to, or join in any
such Surrender, or Instrument purporting such Surrender
as aforesaid; or did solicit, procure, prosecute, or did
pay or contribute to the Charge of prosecuting any Scire
Facias, Quo Warranto, or Information in the Nature of
a Quo Warranto, by this Act declared void; shall be, and
is hereby declared, adjudged, and enacted, for the Space
of * Years, uncapable and disabled to all Intents and
Purposes to bear or execute any Office, Employment, or
Place of Trust, as a Member of such respective Body
Corporate, or in or for such respective City, Town, or
Borough, or Cinque Port, whereof or wherein he was a
Member of such respective Body Corporate, at, or before the time of the making such Surrender, or Instrument purporting such Surrender, or the suing out or
prosecuting such Scire Facias, Quo Warranto, or Instrument in the Nature of a Quo Warranto; any thing in
this Act contained, or any other Law, Statute, or any
Ordinance, Charter, Custom or Thing, to the contrary
in any wise notwithstanding. Which said Clause was
twice read.
An Amendment was proposed to be made in the Clause
by adding, after the Words, "declared void," these
Words, "or did procure any Warrant of the King and
Council to be admitted to the Offices of Mayor, Recorder,
Steward, Town Clerk, or other Officer, in any Corporation; or was a Regulator, or admitted into any Corporation upon any Regulation made thereof:" And other
Amendments were proposed.
Upon which a Debate arose in the House.
And a Motion being made, and the Question being
put, That the Debate be adjourned;
The House divided.
The Yeas go forth.
|
|
|
| Tellers for the Yeas, |
Mr. Cognisby, |
89. |
| Mr. Peirpoint, |
| Tellers for the Noes, |
Sir Rob. Gwyn, |
127. |
| Mr. Smith, |
So it passed in the Negative.
Resolved, That Candles be brought in.
And the Question being put, That the said Words be
added to the Clause;
The House divided.
The Yeas go forth.
|
|
|
| Tellers for the Yeas, |
Mr. Pelham, |
78. |
| Mr. Fax, |
| Tellers for the Noes, |
Mr. Ellwell, |
133. |
| Mr. H. Herbert, |
So it passed in the Negative.
Another Amendment was proposed to be made in
the Clause, by leaving out, "without the Consent of the
greater Number of the respective Body Corporate, City,
or Cinque Port, whereof he was a Member previously declared:" Which was, upon the Question put thereupon,
agreed unto by the House: And the Amendment made
accordingly.
And it being proposed, and the Question being put,
That the Blank in the Clause be filled up with "Seven;"
it was agreed unto by the House: And the Blank filled
up accordingly.
And the Question being put, That the Clause, so
amended, be made Part of the Bill;
The House divided.
The Yeas go forth.
|
|
|
| Tellers for the Yeas. |
Lord Colchester, |
133. |
| Sir Scroope Howe, |
| Tellers for the Noes, |
Mr. Greenvile, |
68. |
| Sir John Wynne, |
So it was resolved in the Affirmative.
Another Clause was offered to be made Part of the
Bill: Which was twice read; and is as followeth, viz.
"And be it further Enacted, by the Authority aforesaid, That if any Person hereby Enacted and Declared to be
incapable and disabled to bear or execute any such Office,
Employment, or Place of Trust, as aforesaid, shall, at
any time after the, take upon him to bear or execute
any such Office, Employment, or Place of Trust, as aforesaid; every such Person shall forfeit the Sum of;
to be recovered by any Member or Inhabitant of the respective Body Corporate, City, Town, Borough, or
Cinque Port, who shall sue for the same by Action of
Debt, Bill, or Plaint, in any of their Majesties Courts of
Record at Westminster; wherein no Essoign, Protection,
Privilege, or Wager of Law, or more than one Imparlance shall be allowed: And also, upon Verdict found
or Judgment given by Confession, or otherwise, in such
Action against the Defendant, the said Defendant shall
be for ever incapable to bear or execute any Office or
Place of Trust whatsoever, within the Kingdom of England, or Dominion of Wales: Provided also, and be it
Enacted, That a former Action depending shall be no
Plea for the Defendant in any Action to be brought upon
this Statute, if such former Action hath depended by the
Space of Three Terms: Nor shall a Nonsuit of the Plaintiff, or a Judgment for the Defendant in any former, be
a Bar to the Plaintiff in any Action to be brought upon
this Statute."
And it being proposed, That the First Blank be filled
up with "Twenty-fifth Day of March One thousand Six
hundred and Ninety;" and the Second Blank with "Five
hundred Pounds," the same were, upon the Question
severally put thereupon, agreed unto by the House: And
the Blanks filled up accordingly.
Resolved, That the Clause, so amended, be made Part
of the Bill.
An Amendment was proposed to be made in the Preamble of the Bill, by adding these Words, "and Town
of Berwick upon Tweed:" Which was, upon the Question
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House: And the Bill
amended accordingly.
Ordered, That the Bill, with the several Clauses and
Amendments, be ingrossed.