House of Lords Journal Volume 19
23 January 1711

Sponsor

History of Parliament Trust

Publication

Year published

1767-1830

Pages

Annotate

Comment on this article
Double click anywhere on the text to add an annotation in-line

Citation Show another format:

'House of Lords Journal Volume 19: 23 January 1711', Journal of the House of Lords: volume 19: 1709-1714 (1767-1830), pp. 200-201. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=29897 Date accessed: 17 April 2014. Add to my bookshelf


Highlight

(Min 3 characters)

Die Martis, 23 Januarii.

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:

Epus. Petriburg.
Epus. Carliol.
Epus. Bristol.
Ds. Custos Magni Sigilli.
Comes Rochester, Præses.
Dux Buckingham, Senescallus.
Dux Shrewsbury, Camerarius.
Dux Northumberland.
Dux Bedford.
Dux Devon.
Dux Marlborough.
Dux Atholl.
March. Dorchester.
March. Annandale.
Comes Pembroke.
Comes Lincoln.
Comes Bridgewater.
Comes Leicester.
Comes Northampton.
Comes Westmorland.
Comes Berks.
Comes Stamford.
Comes Winchilsea.
Comes Thanet.
Comes Sunderland.
Comes Scarsdale.
Comes Clarendon.
Comes Anglesea.
Comes Nottingham.
Comes Abingdon.
Comes Holdernesse.
Comes Scarbrough.
Comes Orford.
Comes Jersey.
Comes Grantham.
Comes Wharton.
Comes Poulet.
Comes Godolphin.
Comes Cholmondeley.
Comes Eglintoun.
Comes Loudoun.
Comes Northesk.
Comes I'lay.
Viscount Say & Seale.
Viscount Kilsyth.
Ds. Dartmouth.
Ds. Hunsdon.
Ds. Rockingham.
Ds. Berkeley.
Ds. Cornwallis.
Ds. Ossulstone.
Ds. Stawell.
Ds. Guilford.
Ds. Weston.
Ds. Herbert.
Ds. Haversham.
Ds. Sommers.
Ds. Halifax.
Ds. Gernsey.
Ds. Cowper.
Ds. Blantyre.

PRAYERS.

Paul versus Shaw, in Error.

Whereas Friday next is appointed for hearing the Errors argued, upon the Writ of Error depending in this House, wherein William Paul and Christopher Clitheroe Esquires are Plaintiffs, and Sir John Shaw Baronet is Defendant:

It is therefore Ordered, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That all the Judges do attend this House on that Day.

Ordered, That all the Lords be summoned to attend the House To-morrow.

Nugent versus Reily.

Upon reading the Petition of Robert Nugent and Michael Nugent Esquires; shewing, "That the Petitioners exhibited their Appeal into this House, the last Session of the last Parliament, from a Decree made in Favour of Charles Reily, John Reily, and Edmond Reily, by the Court of Exchequer in Ireland; and obtained an Order for the Respondents to answer to the said Appeal by a certain Day within the last Sessions; that the Respondents, though duly served with the said Order, did not comply therewith; but, in Contempt, are now proceeding to an Execution of the said Decree, on Pretence that the said Appeal is determined by the Dissolution of the last Parliament; and praying, that the Respondents do put in their Answer by a short Day; and that all Proceeding on the said Decree may be stayed until the Hearing of the Appeal:"

It is Ordered, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Charles Reily, John Reily, and Edm'd Reily, shall and they are hereby required, peremptorily, to put in their Answer to the said Appeal, in Writing, on or before Tuesday, the Thirteenth Day of February next, at Eleven a Clock.

Adjourn.

Dominus Custos Magni Sigilli declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Mercurii, vicesimum quartum diem instantis Januarii, hora undecima Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.