35. THE PRIORY OF HAYLING
The island of Hayling is stated by the
Winchester Annals to have come into the
possession of the cathedral church of St.
Swithun, partly by the gift of Queen Emma,
the wife of Ethelred, and partly by the gift of
Bishop Alwyn.
A charter of William I., probably of the
year 1067, in which he describes himself as
Lord of Normandy and King of England by
hereditary right, for the profit of his soul and
at the urgent advice of his councillors, bestows
on the famous abbey of St. Peter of Jumièges
the manor of Hayling. The charter concludes with a prayer that any one infringing
this gift may be removed from the communion
of saints. (fn. 7) A charter of Henry I. between
1101 and 1106, addressed to Archbishop
Anselm, William, Bishop of Winchester,
Henry de Port, sheriff, and all his lieges of
Hampshire, granted to the abbey of Jumièges,
Hayling with all its appurtenances and privileges. A charter of Bishop Henry de Blois,
between 1139 and 1142, refers to the strife
between the churches of Winchester and
Jumièges concerning the right to a portion of
Hayling Island, and states that he and the
whole convent of Winchester at the prayer of
Pope Innocent, and in consideration of the
poverty of the church of Jumièges, grant the
said portion of the island to that church as its
possession for ever, and will never again stir
up strife concerning it. The first witness to
this charter was King Stephen, and the second
Archbishop Theobald. But notwithstanding
this solemn covenant the dispute still lingered.
In 1150 Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury,
wrote to Bishop Henry of Winchester saying
that the monks of Jumièges had lately
approached him, imploring him to bear witness
to the truth as to the agreement made in his
presence between them and Bishop Henry as
to Hayling. He therefore stated simply what
he remembered of it. His recollection was
that, for the peaceful and quiet possession of
the land, the monks promised him to pay 100
marks, of which Henry, if he will kindly
remember, remitted 20; of any other undertaking given him, neither Theobald nor any
of those who were present have any recollection. He bears witness to what he heard.
The archbishop concluded with the pious
aspiration that Henry might be pleased to
approve what so many witnesses declare to
have been done, and that God would grant him
eternal bliss. (fn. 8)
About the year 1174 Henry II. granted a
general charter of confirmation to the abbey of
Jumièges of their English possessions. Therein is specified the 'greater part of the island
of Hayling, with the church and tithes of the
whole island, except the tithes of pulse and
oats in the land of the Bishop of Winchester,
and in the same island sac and soc and thol
and theam and infangenethef and all othercustoms.' (fn. 1) From this it is evident that the
whole of the land of the island was not then
in the possession of the abbey, but that the
monks had manorial rights and franchises over
the whole. The grant of 'thol' would be of
much importance and value. They also held
the whole of the ferry rights.
In 1248 there was a fierce dispute relative
to the right of presentation to the church of
St. Peter, Winterborne Stoke, in the diocese
of Salisbury. Eventually the pope issued his
mandate to the Bishop of Salisbury formally to
induct one of the claimants, and stated in his
communication that the prior of Hayling, who
claimed the church by gift of Pope Gregory,
deserved to forfeit Pope Gregory's grant because of his violence. (fn. 2)
The church of St. Swithun managed to
keep a foothold in the island, and in 1284
transferred their tenants of Hayling to Bishop
Pontoise and his successors. These lands in
the north of the island remained in the
possession of the Bishops of Winchester, as
part of the manor of Havant, down to 1553. (fn. 3)
It has been more than once asserted that the
priory of Hayling was not founded or erected
till the reign of Henry III., but this is improbable. The abbot and convent of Jumièges
would be quite sure to send over a colony of
monks to the island so soon as the Conqueror
gave them so valuable a gift, and a cell or
priory, with suitable buildings, including a
chapel or conventual church, would be speedily
erected.
A dispute arose during the episcopate of
John de Pontoise respecting the chapel of
St. Peter in the north of Hayling Island, sometimes termed the chapel of Northwood. The
bishop's award was to the effect that the vicar
of Hayling and his successors were faithfully
to serve the chapel as had been customary;
namely that during the weeks of Christmas,
Easter and Whitsuntide, and on double
festivals and on every Sunday, there was to be
full and complete service, namely mattins,
evensong and compline, as well as masses, and
that mass should also be celebrated on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays every week. (fn. 4)
The dispute was however renewed in 1317
between the parishioners of the chapel of St.
Peter and Michael, the vicar, inasmuch as he
had for some time neglected to give them
mattins, evensong or compline on any of the
appointed times. The vicar was summoned
before the bishop, and pleaded as an excuse
that no books were provided for such services.
The vicar and parishioners however agreed
to accept implicitly the bishop's ruling. The
bishop, recognizing the right of the rector of
the church of Hayling, to which the chapel
was annexed, summoned the prior of Hayling,
as proctor for the abbot of Jumièges, as well
as the vicar and parishioners to appear before
Master Henry de Clife, his commissary.
After deliberation, the vicar of his own free
Will undertook to follow out precisely the
ordinance of Bishop Pontoise, and also took
upon himself the burden of finding the
necessary books. The bishop gave his formal
decision, reciting the action of the vicar, on 9
December, 1317. (fn. 5)
The priors of Hayling were simply nominated by the foreign abbot and were removable
at will, and so we look in vain for any
reference to them in the episcopal books. On
an aid being granted to Edward I., the prior
of Hayling was summoned, but he pleaded
that the priory was alien and not conventual,
and that all the priors of the same, from time
whereof the memory of man ran not to the
contrary, had been appointed or removed at
the motion and will of the abbot of St. Peter
of Jumièges in Normandy and were not perpetual and were not inducted. (fn. 6)
The taxation of 1291 returned the prior of
Hayling as holding in the island £20 of rents,
agricultural land taxed at £5, a mill taxed at
13s. 4d., a dovecote at 4s., a garden at 6s.,
and service of villeins at 20s., yielding an
annual income of £27 3s. 4d. At the same
time the rectory of Hayling, which was in
the hands of the prior on behalf of the abbot
of Jumièges, was returned at the high annual
value of £80, whilst the vicarage was worth
£14 6s. 8d.
This priory suffered much from two causes,
war and the encroachment of the seas. In
1294 Edward I., in consequence of war with
France, seized all the alien priories in England
which were dependent upon the abbeys of
Normandy. The prior himself was for a time
taken into custody, the goods and chattels
seized, and an inventory of the lands and
tenements forwarded to the exchequer. In
this return of the priory of Hayling, it is
stated that the prior's garden and dovecote
within the precincts were worth by the year
50s., and that there were 366 acres of waste
land in demesne worth by the year £12
4s. 2d.; 10 acres of wood, 20s.; 100 acres of
sheepwalk, 16s. 8d.; and a watermill, 60s.;
giving a total of £19 10s. 10d. The annual
value of the whole manor, including the
church at £80, was £144 8s. 3½d. The
goods and crops were estimated at £67 16s,;
under this heading were included a palfrey
worth, 60s.; a sumpter horse, 40s.; and two
asses, 4s. The prior himself was probably
released, as was the case with the heads of
other alien houses, on finding sureties to
observe neutrality during the continuance of
the war. (fn. 1)
On the renewal of hostilities with France
in the reign of Edward II., the alien priories
including Hayling were again seized. A
return was made of its possessions in January,
1325, by authority of a commission addressed
to Ralph de Bereford and Richard de
Westcote, keepers of the alien houses of
Hampshire. The prior of Hayling however
appeared in person before the barons of the
exchequer at Westminster, and pleaded that
his house and its appurtenances might be
committed to him for safe custody. His
prayer was granted on condition of his finding
security for the safe custody of all the goods
and chattels.
And now another misfortune befell the
priory. From the beginning of the reign of
Edward I. the sea had been making gradual
encroachments on the west shore of the island,
and lessening by degrees the property of the
monks. But in 1324-5 the whole line of
our south coast suffered much depredation, and
a very considerable portion of the island of
Hayling was definitely submerged beneath the
waters, including the priory church and conventual buildings. The prior forwarded a
statement to the Crown, and on 8 March,
1325, an inquisition was held before Ralph de
Bereford and Richard de Westcote, as wardens
of the alien houses, to ascertain the truth.
The jurors found upon oath that 206 acres of
arable land of the priory demesne had been
inundated and destroyed by the sea since 1294,
and that they were worth £10 6s. by the
year, because the better land of Hayling was
that nearest the sea; that 80 acres of pasture
belonging to the priory had been submerged,
worth 20s. a year; that six virgates of the
land of customary tenants had been destroyed,
the rental of which was 48s.; that nearly the
whole hamlet of East Stoke with lands pertaining, as well as a great part of the larger hamlet
of Northwood and its lands, which belonged
to the parish church of Hayling and which the
prior had for his proper use, were submerged,
diminishing the annual value of the priory by
£26 13s. 4d.; that the two priory mills were
less by 20s. a year because the tenants used to
grind at these mills; that the court fines and
perquisites were less by 20s. a year; and that
the full annual value of the possessions destroyed by the sea amounted to the considerable
total of £42 7s. 4d. They returned the
then annual value of the lands, tenements and
church at £48 8s. 5d. (fn. 2)
In November, 1313, John Abel, escheator
citra Trentam, received orders to desist from
demanding fealty from the prior of Hayling
for the priory lands, and to permit him to hold
the same without hindrance, as he complained
of being distrained for fealty of the lands he
held of the king in Hampshire, Wiltshire
and Somerset of the gift of William the
Conqueror in free alms, without doing any
secular service. It was definitely stated in
this order that none of the priors of Hayling
nor the abbots of St. Peter of Jumièges, of
which the priory was a cell, had done fealty
at times of voidance of either the priory or the
abbey. (fn. 3)
The priory was bound to provide support
for two of the king's pensioners. In
February, 1318, Oudinus Bruant, king's yeoman, was sent to the prior and convent of
Hayling to receive the same maintenance for
life as Philip Walrond, deceased, had received
in that house by order of Edward I. (fn. 4) In
1334 Simon Bacon was sent to the house of
Hayling to receive such maintenance as Philip
Walrond had had there. (fn. 5)
These were bad times for even the best
established of the alien houses. The heavy
exactions of the Crown led the manorial
villeins in some cases into the mistake of
thinking that the law would not intervene for
the maintenance of their rights. In February,
1338, the prior of Hayling, who was holding
the priory and its lands of the Crown at a
rental of £80, complained that though his
predecessors time out of mind had had divers
villeins in the manor of Hayling, from whom
they used to receive corporal ransom at their
will, arid fines in any voidance, yet these had
by their confederacy among themselves and
others refused to make such ransoms and
fines or other services and customs to the prior;
had rescued distraints made for these; and
when the prior and his bailiffs and servants
would have taken other distraints had rescued
them with armed force. Commissioners were
thereupon appointed to take an inquisition at
Hayling as to all the particulars.
Nor had the inundations come to an end
with the winter storms of 1324-5. The sea
continued to encroach on Hayling throughout
the fourteenth century. In 1340 there was
a further grievous incroach of the water to
such an extent that men then living officially
testified that they had known the first church
of Hayling (which was originally all in the
centre of the island) standing in good preservation by the sea shore, and that it was then two
miles (leucas) from the shore, and so deep in
the water that an English vessel of the larger
class could pass over it. (fn. 1) Jurors in 1341
testified to the greatly diminished value of the
priory and the church, so much having been
destroyed by the sea. (fn. 2)
In 1391, Simon Dubosc, abbot of Jumièges,
retired from the abbey to Hayling, having
obtained a restoration of the priory through
the Duke of Lancaster, while he was in France
as an ambassador endeavouring to arrange
terms of peace. Three monks accompanied
him from the mother abbey to re-establish
discipline at Hayling Priory. (fn. 3) The abbey
continued to enjoy a considerable share of the
revenues of the priory until 1413, when the
general dissolution of the alien priories came
about, and Henry V. granted Hayling to the
monastery of Sheen in Surrey.
A chartulary of Sheen in the British Museum
contains a catalogue, covering many folios, of
the various evidences and charters of the
suppressed house of Hayling that had come
into their keeping. (fn. 4) Among the long list of
muniments were indentures binding the prior
to find life corrodies for two men at the king's
mandate; a charter of free-warren from Henry
I., the titles to the churches of Hayling,
Winterborne Stoke and Chewton, 'a byll of
supplication made by the tenantys of Hayling
to the priour and convent of Shene,' also 'a
byll of supplication made by the tenantys of
Hayling to the Comons in the Parlyament of
ther sume of dymes to be diminished,' and a
bull of Pope Innocent as to the appropriation
of the church of Hayling and the chapel of
Northwood.