| 1 |
Roger's charter is printed in Dugd. Mon. vi (2),
632, from the copy in B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12,
f. 1a. Roger's grant is the first charter copied in Cott.
MS. Nero C. 12, which is a cartulary of the hosp.
There is no statement in the MS. that this grant is the
foundation charter. |
| 2 |
Complete Peerage, ix, 369, citing Chron., Steph.,
Hen. II, and Ric. I (Rolls Ser.), iii, 182-3. Roger's
charter is witnessed by 2 of his sons: Dugd. Mon. vi (2),
632. |
| 3 |
Pipe R. 1162 (Pipe R. Soc. v), 2. |
| 4 |
Complete Peerage, ix, 370. |
| 5 |
Leics. ii, 272. |
| 6 |
His gifts were confirmed by Hen. II in a charter
not later than 1184. See Cal. Chart. R., 1327-41, 77,
where details of Hen.'s charter are given, and Dugd.
Mon. vi (2), 634. |
| 7 |
Loseby was apparently appropriated by 1232:
Rot. Hugonis de Welles, ed. W. P. W. Phillimore, ii,
320. |
| 8 |
Nichols, Leics. ii, App., 128-9; Dugd. Mon. vi
(2), 633; B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12, ff. 98a, 100.
The hosp. never seems to have obtained the advowson
of Haselbech: Dugd. Mon. vi (2), 633; Rot. Hugonis
de Welles, ii, 98. The hosp. at Tilton was still in
existence in 1345: Cal. Close, 1343-6, 631. |
| 9 |
See the confirmation charters by Hen. II (Nichols,
Leics. ii, App., 129; Dugd. Mon. vi (2), 634; Cal.
Chart. R., 1327-41, 77) and John (Rot. Chart., 11991216 (Rec. Com.), 67). |
| 10 |
Nichols, Leics. ii, App., 129; Dugd. Mon. vi (2),
634; Cal. Chart. R., 1327-41, 77; B.M. Harl. MS.
3868. Spondon was appropriated to Burton Lazars in
or shortly after 1286: Descriptive Cat. of Derbys.
Charts.; ed. I. H. Jeayes, 275; B.M. Harl. MS. 3868,
ff. 11b-17. |
| 11 |
Early Yorks. Chart., ed. W. Farrer, iii, 156-7;
Cal. Chart. R., 1327-41, 77. By 1270 the advowson
of Castleford had reverted to the Lacy family: Reg. of
Walter Giffard, ed. Wm. Brown, 31. |
| 12 |
Nichols, Leics. ii, App., 129. |
| 13 |
Rot. Chart., 1199-1216 (Rec. Com.), 67. The
money continued to be paid under Hen. III and
Edw. I: Cal. Lib., 1240-5, 182, 285; 1245-51, 44,
115, 178, 232, 283, 384; Cal. Close, 1279-88, 100. |
| 14 |
Rot. Chart., 1199-1216 (Rec. Com.), 67. |
| 15 |
Cal. Close, 1330-3,187; 1333-7, 32, 44; 1385-9,
218; 1447-54, 449; Cal. Pat., 1343-5, 224; Cal. Fine
R., 1452-61, 38. |
| 16 |
Cal. Papal Letters, 1447-55, 72. |
| 17 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 252. |
| 18 |
Cal. Pat., 1216-25, 443; Cal. Papal Letters,
1417-31, 181. |
| 19 |
B.M. Harl. MS. 3868, f. 16a. |
| 20 |
Cal. Pat., 1307-13, 344; 1313-17, 1, 394; 131721, 394, 571; 1377-81, 290; 1422-9, 268; Cal. Chart.
R., 1341-1417, 165. |
| 21 |
B.M. Add. Chart. 33635; Cal Pat., 1361-4,
253. In 1371 Nicholas of Dover described himself as
'governor, warden, and master of the conventual house
of Burton Lazars, and lieutenant and vicar-general in
spiritualities and temporalities of the General Master
of the Order of St. Lazarus in England and Scotland':
Cal. Pat., 1370-4, 418. See also ibid., 1377-81, 290. |
| 22 |
Cal. Pat., 1345-8, 414; 1354-8, 43. |
| 23 |
In 1353 a member of the Order from Burton
obtained the king's protection for a journey overseas
to treat with the Master Superior of the Order: Cal.
Pat., 1350-4, 502. |
| 24 |
Ibid., 1436-41, 362. |
| 25 |
Cal. Papal Letters, 1447-55, 81; for other papal
privileges bestowed on the hospital in the 15th century,
see Leic. Boro. Rec., 1327-1509, 386-7. |
| 26 |
In 1457 a brother of Burton was referred to as
belonging to the Order of the Cruciferi (Cal. Papal
Letters, 1455-64,126), but this term was used to denote
several different bodies living under the Augustinian
rule (D. Knowles, Religious Orders in Engl. 203), and
it is unlikely that Burton Lazars was attached to any
of the Orders known as Friars of the Cross. |
| 27 |
B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12, ff. 116a-117b;
Nichols, Leics. ii, 275. The agreement is dated 'in the
year in which the young King of France was married'.
If the king in question was Louis VII, the year would
be 1137, when Louis first married. If the king meant
is Philip II, the year similarly would be 1180. But see
above on the date of Burton's foundation. The agreement was confirmed by Wm., Count of Aumale, and
the last English Count Wm. died in 1260. |
| 28 |
Dugd. Mon. vi (2), 634; Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.),
iv, 153. |
| 29 |
Cal. Pat., 1292-1301, 404. |
| 30 |
Dugd. Mon. vi (2), 635-6. |
| 31 |
Cal. Pat., 1401-5, 120. |
| 32 |
Cal. Close, 1399-1401, 450-1; 1402-5, 16. |
| 33 |
Cal. Pat., 1413-16, 248. |
| 34 |
Dugd. Mon. vi (2), 635. |
| 35 |
Cal. Close, 1346-9, 338, 382. |
| 36 |
Cal. Pat., 1345-8, 408. |
| 37 |
V.C.H. Derbys. ii, 78. |
| 38 |
Ibid.; Dugd. Mon. vi (2), 634. |
| 39 |
Tax. Eccl. (Rec. Com.), 94. |
| 40 |
J. Tanner, Notitia Mon. (1744), 358. |
| 41 |
Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.), iv, 152. See also Tax.
Eccl. (Rec. Com.), 94. Lands at Choseley are said to
have been given to Burton Lazars by Wm. de Albini,
before 1146 (V.C.H. Norf. ii, 453; Nichols, Leics. ii,
273), but there seems to be no reliable evidence for this. |
| 42 |
Cal. Pat., 1452-61, 359. |
| 43 |
V.C.H. Lincs, ii, 231. |
| 44 |
Cal. Pat., 1461-7, 123. |
| 45 |
Ibid. |
| 46 |
Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.), iv, 152; Dugd. Mon.
vi (2), 634. |
| 47 |
Cal. Pat., 1416-22, 310-11; B.M. Add. Chart.
33635. |
| 48 |
Geoffrey had been master at ah earlier date: Cal.
Pat., 1354-8, 43. |
| 49 |
The dispute was in progress in 1369: Cal. Pat.,
1367-70, 259. |
| 50 |
Cal. Close, 1369-74, 432. |
| 51 |
Nichols, Leics. ii, App., 129; B.M. Cott. MS.
Nero C. 12, f. 1a. |
| 52 |
Leland's Itin., ed. Lucy Toulmin-Smith, iv, 19;
J. Leland, Collect. (1770), i, 72. |
| 53 |
Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.), iv, 152. |
| 54 |
Ibid. 152-3. |
| 55 |
L. & P. Hen. VIII, xi, p. 114. |
| 56 |
Ibid, xii (1), p. 35. |
| 57 |
B.M. Harl. Chart. 80, F26. |
| 58 |
Descriptive Cat. of Derbys. Charts., ed. I. H.
Jeayes, 79-80. |
| 59 |
L. & P. Hen. VIII, xix (1), p. 371. |
| 60 |
An incomplete list is given in Farnham, Leics.
Notes, i, 269. |
| 61 |
B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12, ff. 3a, 34. The
date of this master's rule is unknown. |
| 62 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 252. |
| 63 |
Ibid. i, 269. Heincius occurs in a fine dated Hil.,
6 Hen. III. Farnham, op. cit. i, 269, gives the date
as 1221, but Hil., 6 Hen. III, falls in Jan. 1221-2,
i.e. in the historical year 1222. |
| 64 |
Cal. Lib., 1245-51, 44. |
| 65 |
B.M. Harl. MS. 3868, ff. 15b, 16a. |
| 66 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 269. |
| 67 |
B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12, f. 31. |
| 68 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, iii, 109. |
| 69 |
Ibid. i, 255. |
| 70 |
Cal. Close, 1279-88, 418. |
| 71 |
B.M. Add. Chart. 33635; Cott. MS. Nero C. 12,
f. 33. The position of this master in the list is uncertain. He may be the same person as Ric. Germin',
who was master about the same period: B.M. Cott.
MS. Nero C. 12, ff. 3b, 61a. |
| 72 |
Ibid., f. 52a. |
| 73 |
Cal. Pat., 1317-21, 394. |
| 74 |
Cal. Close, 1318-23, 498. |
| 75 |
B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12, f. 47a. |
| 76 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 258. |
| 77 |
Cal. Close, 1330-3, 327. |
| 78 |
B.M. Cott. MS. Nero C. 12, f. 37a. |
| 79 |
Cal. Close, 1339-41, 148. |
| 80 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 259. |
| 81 |
Cal. Close, 1346-9, 382. |
| 82 |
Cal. Pat., 1345-8, 414. |
| 83 |
Ibid., 1354-8, 43. |
| 84 |
Cal. Close, 1354-60, 498. |
| 85 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 269. |
| 86 |
Ibid. On the dispute for the mastership between
Nicholas and Geoffrey of Chaddesden, see above,
PP. 37-38. |
| 87 |
Cal. Pat., 1388-92, 117. |
| 88 |
Ibid., 1399-1401, 434; Cal. Close, 1399-1402,
450-1. |
| 89 |
Cal. Papal Letters, vii, 181. |
| 90 |
Ibid. |
| 91 |
Cal. Close, 1441-7, 343. |
| 92 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 262; Cal. Papal Letters,
1447-55, 81. |
| 93 |
Farnham, op. cit. i, 269. |
| 94 |
Ibid. |
| 95 |
B.M. Harl. Chart. 43 A13. |
| 96 |
Hist. MSS. Com., Middleton, 125. |
| 97 |
Farnham, Leics. Notes, i, 269. |
| 98 |
L. & P. Hen. VIII, iv (1), p. 332. |