Sabbati, 14 die Aprilis;
6° Gulielmi et Mariæ.
Prayers.
Recovery of Tythes.
MR. Clarke reported from the Committee, appointed
to draw up Reasons, to be offered to the Lords at
a Conference, for disagreeing to the Amendments made
by the Lords to the Bill, intituled, An Act for the more
easy Recovery of small Tythes, That they had drawn up
the same accordingly; which they had directed him to
report to the House; and which he read in his Place;
and afterwards delivered in at the Clerk's Table: Where
the same were read; and agreed unto by the House; and
are as follow; viz.
The Commons disagree to the Amendments made by
the Lords, in the 4th, 6th, and 7th Lines of the
Third Press.
1st. Because the whole Intent of the Bill would be
defeated thereby.
2. For that the Bill is designed to give those who are
intitled to small Tythes, a more easy and effectual Remedy for the Recovery of them; and to avoid the Vexation of long and chargeable Suits for such small Matters:
And the Commons conceive it unreasonable, That the
Persons to whom small Tythes are, or shall be, due,
should be discouraged from seeking their Right, by the
Consideration of the Tediousness, and the Expence, of a
Suit to recover it; or that the Person, who may have
neglected or omitted to pay an Easter Offering of Twopence, a few Eggs, or some such thing, be put to a long
and troublesome Defence; wherein, how little soever
the thing recovered against him may be, yet he may be
condemned in 20, 30, 40l. or greater Costs: And therefore the Bill provides, That where the Title is not in
Question, nor the Value of what is demanded exceeds
20 s. there shall be no Suit for such small Tythes, but
in the cheap and summary Way that the Bill provides;
Whereas, by the Lords Amendments, that Intent of the
Bill is frustrated, and the Inconveniencies and Charges
by the former Methods, for Recovery of small Tythes,
are not prevented.
3dly. For that the Lords, by a subsequent Amendment,
have agreed this Bill to be beneficial to the Clergy; and
yet have excluded the Laity from taking any Advantage
by it: And the Lords have, by these Amendments, left
the Minister at Liberty to bring his Suit upon this Bill, or
not; but have absolutely subjected the Parishioner to a
new Jurisdiction, without freeing him from the Danger of
being grieved by the old, dilatory, vexatious, and chargeable, Method.
4. For that the Commons are of Opinion, This Bill
makes a beneficial Provision for all Parties concerned;
and therefore the old Method of Suit for small Tythes
should not be continued: And that there appears to be
as much Reason against the Bill itself, to which the Lords
have agreed, as there is for these Amendments made by
the Lords.
The Commons disagree to the Lords Amendment in
Line 30th, Press 5th:
1st, Because it alters the Intent of that Proviso, which
was to be a Limitation of Time, within which all Claims
for small Tythes should be made, or barred: Whereas the
Lords Amendment makes it only a Bar to any Suit
founded on this Act; but leaves Liberty of Suit for the
same, in other Courts as before.
2dly, For that there is as much reason to limit a Time
within which all Suits for small Tythes, due before the
passing this Act, shall be commenced, as to limit a Time,
within which all Suits shall be prosecuted for small Tythes,
that shall became due for the future: And the Lords have
agreed to a Clause in the Bill, whereby all Suits for future Dues, are required to be commenced within Three
Years, or else they shall be barred.
3dly, For that the Commons think the First of May
1695, a reasonable Time to be given for bringing any
Suit for a Matter of so small Value, which is already due;
because few People take Receipts, or call Witnesses to
testify the Payment of such little Sums; and, after a Year
or two, it would be a hard Matter for any Person that has
paid his Due to prove the same: And the Proof will, in
this Case, lie on the Defendant, who ought not to be left
liable thereto for so long a time till it will become very
difficult for him to do it.
The Commons cannot agree to the Clause mark'd A:
1. Because they think themselves in Conscience bound
to mete the same Measure to all Persons, and to let all the
Subjects have equal Benefit of the Laws: And therefore
they conceive, as to small Tythes, whether due to a Lay
Person, or an Ecclesiastical Person, the Remedy for the
Recovery of them ought to be the same; for it is an undoubted Maxim, That where there is the same Right
there ought to be the same Remedy.
2. The Design of the Bill being to prevent Injustice in
detaining what is due, and to provide against Oppression
and Vexation in suing for those Dues which are of small
Value; the Reason is the same, why Laymen should have
the Benefit of this Bill, as well as Ecclesiastical Persons:
But by this Clause an Ecclesiastical Person, who is Owner
or Occupier of a Lay Impropriation, as the Lords call it,
or Rectory Impropriate, or Portion of small Tythes, shall
be included in the Bill, and have the Benefit of it, though
a Layman shall not: Now the Commons do not see any
Reason to make any such Difference between Ecclesiastical
Persons and Laymen: And are therefore of Opinion
That where there is the same Reason, there ought to be
the same Law.
Conference desired with Lords.
Ordered, That a Conference be desired with the Lords,
upon the Subject-matter of the said Amendments.
Clitheroe Election.
Ordered, That the Report from the Committee of
Privileges and Elections, touching the Election for the
Borough of Clitheroe, be made upon Tuesday Morning
next.
Supply Bill; Duties on Paper, &c.
A Bill for granting to their Majesties several Duties
upon Paper and Parchment was read the Second time.
Resolved, That the Bill be committed to a Committee
of the whole House.
Resolved, That this House will, upon Monday Morning
next, at Eleven a Clock, resolve itself into a Committee
of the whole House to consider of the Bill.
Commissioners of Accounts.
An ingrossed Bill for appointing and enabling Commissioners to examine, take, and state, the publick Accounts
of the Kingdom, was read the Third time:
An ingrossed Clause was offered, as a Rider, That the
Commissioners do, by the next Session, state the Debt due
to the Transports, for the War of Ireland:
And the same was thrice read; and, upon the Question
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House to be made Part
of the Bill.
Resolved, That the Bill do pass: And that the Title be,
An Act for appointing and enabling Commissioners to
examine, take, and state, the publick Accounts of the
Kingdom.
Ordered, That Mr. Boyle do carry the Bill to the Lords,
and desire their Concurrence thereunto.
A Message from the Lords, by Sir Robert Legard and
Mr. Holford:
Mr. Speaker,
Vexatious Suits.
The Lords have agreed to the Bill, intituled, An Act
for preventing frivolous and vexatious Suits, with some
Amendments: To which they desire the Concurrence of
this House: And also,
Duchy of Cornwall Leasing.
The Lords have agreed to the Bill, intituled, An Act
for enabling their Majesties to make Grants, Leases, and
Copies of Offices, Lands, and Hereditaments, Parcel of
their Duchy of Cornwall, or annexed to the same; and
for Confirmation of Leases and Grants already made; with
some Amendments: To which they desire the Concurrence
of this House.
And then the Messengers withdrew.
Tonage Duties, &c. [Bank of England incorporated.]
The House, according to the Order of the Day, took
into further Consideration the Report from the Committee of the whole House to whom the Bill for granting
to their Majesties certain Duties upon Wines, and upon
Beer, Ale, and other Liquors; and also the Bill for
granting to their Majesties several Duties upon the Tonage of Ships; . . . .:
And the rest of the Amendments, made by the Committee to the said Bills, were severally read a Second
time; and some agreed, and others disagreed, unto by the
House, upon the Question severally put thereupon.
A Clause was offered to be added to the Bill, That such
foreign Stores as John Taylor Merchant hath contracted
for to their Majesties Use before the first of December,
which shall be imported, shall not be charged with the
Duty of Tonage:
And the same was twice read.
And the Question being put thereupon, That the
Clause be made Part of the Bill;
It passed in the Negative.
Another Clause was offered to be added to the Bill,
* * * * :
And the same was twice read; and, upon the Question
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House to be made
Part of the Bill.
Another Clause was offered to be added to the Bill,
for appropriating the Monies to be raised by this or any
other Act of this Session, except the Money appropriated
to pay the Recompences in this, and the Act for granting
certain Rates and Duties upon Salt, &c. to the Use of
the Navy and Army:
And the same was twice read; and, upon the Question
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House to be made
Part of the Bill.
Another Clause was offered to be added to the Bill,
That in case the 1,200,000l. shall not be paid in time,
the Fund, intended as a Security for the same, shall stand
a Security to any Person that shall advance any Sum, to
have such Annuities, as the Contributors to the 300,000l.:
And the same was twice read; and, upon the Question
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House to be made
Part of the Bill.
Another Clause was offered to be added to the Bill,
That all Ships importing Goods from France, shall pay
the like Duty of Tonage as those from Portugal, after
the War:
And the same was twice read; and, upon the Question
put thereupon, agreed unto by the House to be made
Part of the Bill.
Another Clause was offered to be added to the Bill,
for settling the Fees for the Officers of the Exchequer;
with a Blank for the Sum:
And a Motion being made, and the Question being
put, That the Blank be filled up with "Three Farthings
in the Pound;"
The House divided.
The Yeas go forth.
|
|
|
|
Tellers for the Yeas, |
Sir S. Bernadiston,
Mr. Christy: |
34 |
| Tellers for the Noes, |
Mr. Herbert,
Mr. Travers: |
49. |
So it passed in the Negative.
A Motion being made, and the Question being put,
That the House do now adjourn;
The House divided.
The Noes go forth.
|
|
|
|
Tellers for the Yeas, |
Sir Tho. Littleton,
Mr. Culliford: |
40. |
| Tellers for the Noes, |
Mr. Boyle,
Mr. Cope: |
45. |
So it passed in the Negative.
An ingrossed Clause was offered to be added to the
Bill, against the Trading of the Corporation:
And the same was once read; and withdrawn, by Leave
of the House.
Ordered, That the further Consideration of the said
Bill be adjourned till Monday Morning next, Eleven a
Clock.
Ordered, That Sir Eliab Harvey have Leave to offer
another Clause of like Nature, to be added to the Bill.
And then the House adjourned till Monday Morning,
Nine a Clock.