14 THE HOUSE OF DOMINICAN FRIARS, DUNSTABLE
The Black Friars arrived in Dunstable in
1259 (fn. 1) at the invitation of the king and queen
and the magnates of the neighbourhood, and
began at once with the help of alms to build
their church. They were very unwelcome
to the canons of that place, and not without
reason; for the novelty of the friars' coming,
and of their manner of life, drew many people
away from their parish church, and diminished
the customary offerings there at a time when
they were sorely needed. (fn. 2) But the prioress
of Markyate, though her own house was not
a wealthy one, was more generous, and helped
the friars with a dole of loaves until their
church should be finished; a kindness illrepaid, for they insisted on the continuance
of the gift after the immediate necessity was
passed, and when the nuns were almost as
poor as themselves. (fn. 3)
The jealousy between the canons and the
friars lasted for some time, but there seems
never to have been any open quarrel; on the
contrary, one of the friars was admitted to
the priory in 1265 for nine years, returning
to his own house in 1274 (fn. 4) ; and in 1278
the prior of Dunstable, William le Breton,
visited and ate with the Dominicans. (fn. 5) In
1282, (fn. 6) at the funeral of a female parishioner
of Dunstable, who had desired to be buried
in the church of the friars, the offerings were
shared quite amicably by the two churches;
but in 1287 (fn. 7) the porter of Dunstable was
made to buy a house near the area of the
Friars Preachers, so that they might not be able
to enlarge their boundaries without the permission of the canons. Again in 1298 (fn. 8) the
bishop sent a mandate to the official of the
archdeacon of Bedford to enjoin the canons
of Dunstable to desist from forbidding and
impeding the Friars Preachers from hearing
the confessions of the people of that place;
but in 1311 (fn. 9) it was the bishop who found
that friars who presented themselves to be
licensed as confessors were becoming too
numerous. Ten were offered to him on this
occasion from Dunstable; this number is
scarcely likely to include all the friars in the
house, as some had probably received licences
before.
John Coton, the prior of the Friars
Preachers at Dunstable, subscribed the acknowledgment of the royal supremacy on
14 May 1534. (fn. 10) Nothing is known of the
order of the house at this time, but it is
somewhat discredited by some scandal that
had taken place there in connection with the
provincial of the order, who was also prior of
(King's) Langley; but Bishop Longland's
letter, in which the affair is mentioned, is so
allusive and obscure that it is difficult to
understand what the scandal was, or whether
any others than the provincial were involved
in it. (fn. 11)
The house was surrendered some time before 8 May 1539, when it was granted to
one of the yeomen of the guard (fn. 12) ; but as
the deed of surrender has been lost, the exact
date is unknown. The income of the house
in 1535 was £4 18s. 8d. (fn. 13)
Footnotes
| 1 |
Ann. Mon. (Rolls Series), iii. 213; Dugdale,
Mon. vi. 1485. |
| 2 |
See Dunstable Priory. |
| 3 |
See Markyate Priory. Adam of Biscot, the
second vicar of Luton, became a Dominican friar
(probably in this house) about this time (Rev. H.
Cobbe, Luton Church, 122). |
| 4 |
Ann. Mon. (Rolls Series), iii. 261. |
| 5 |
Ibid. 278. |
| 6 |
Ibid. 289. The body was first carried to
Dunstable church, where the canons sang the
requiem mass, and had the oblations, including
eight candles, four of which they kept and gave the
other four to the Dominicans. The chronicler of
Dunstable explains here that two candles were
given to the brothers, and two to the sisters; this
looks as if there were Dominican nuns there at the
time, but no other trace of their existence has been
found. |
| 7 |
Ibid. 338. |
| 8 |
Linc. Epis. Reg., Memo. Sutton, 217d. |
| 9 |
Ibid. Memo. Dalderby, 19d. |
| 10 |
L. and P. Hen. VIII. vii. 665. |
| 11 |
Bishop Longland's letter says that he encloses
'the detections of the most honest people of Dunstable' regarding the prior of Langley, who was
also provincial of the order. It is therefore natural
to conclude that the house of the Friars Preachers
at Dunstable had been the scene of some particular
scandal during some visit of the provincial, though
it was not Dunstable but Langley that was 'in
utter decay' (L. and P. Hen. VIII. iv. 4315 [dated
1 June 1528]). |
| 12 |
Ibid. xv. 1032. |
| 13 |
Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.), iv. 210. |