HOUSES OF CISTERCIAN NUNS
9. THE PRIORY OF CATESBY (fn. 1)
Catesby Priory was a house of Cistercian
nuns founded about the year 1175 by Robert de
Easseby, grandson of Sasfrid, who held the manor
of Catesby under William Peverel at the time of
Domesday. It was originally endowed with the
church of Catesby and chapel of Hellidon, and
with lands, tenements, and mills in the same
parish, also with the churches of Ashby and Basford (Nottingham) as well as with lands in both
these parishes. The property of the house was
gradually increased by gifts from different members of the Esseby family, and other benefactors. (fn. 2)
At the time of the dissolution it was worth
£145 0s. 6d., and received rents from lands in
the counties of Leicester, Oxford, Warwick,
and Buckingham, as well as from the county in
which it was situated. (fn. 3)
It does not seem possible to recover anything
of the early history of the house until the year
1229, when Hugh de Neville received a mandate from the king to allow the prioress of
Catesby to have timber from the forest of Silverstone within the king's park for the building of
her church, (fn. 4) and in 1232-3 Henry III. made a
grant to the prioress of a cartload of firewood
daily from his wood of 'Beisewood,' (fn. 5) and this
privilege was subsequently confirmed by his successors Edward I., Edward III., and Henry IV.
The pope in 1246 directed the bishop of Lincoln
to hear the complaints of the sisters against
certain clerics for wrongs done to them, and to
adjudicate in the matter. (fn. 6)
Margaret Rich, sister of Edmund, the canonized archbishop of Canterbury, was at that time
prioress, having been elected in 1245. (fn. 7) The
saintly mother of the archbishop on her deathbed committed his two sisters, Margaret and
Alice, to their brother's care, leaving a certain
sum of money to procure their admission into a
convent of high standing. The archbishop,
however, considered such a dowry bordering on
simony, and in his search for a convent home for
his sisters that would be willing to receive the
maidens with nothing but their piety to recommend them, came to the gate-house of the comparatively poor house of Catesby. The prioress
received them with a warm welcome, and on
her death was succeeded by Margaret the elder.
On the archbishop's death in 1240 he bequeathed
to his sister at Catesby his pall and a silver tablet
engraved with a figure of Our Lord which he
was in the habit of always carrying with him.
Miracles soon became associated with these
relics, and the story of them formed part of
the evidence for St. Edmund's canonization. (fn. 8)
Margaret died in 1257. Matthew Paris, who
chronicles her death, describes her as 'a woman
of great holiness, through whose distinguished
merits miracles have been made gloriously manifest.' (fn. 9) She is sometimes termed St. Margaret of
Catesby. It was no doubt through the influential
position of Margaret that the convent obtained
from the king in 1247 a grant of a weekly
Monday market within their manor of Catesby,
and two years later a grant of a three days' fair
beginning on the eve of the Translation of
Edward the Confessor. (fn. 10) In the autumn of the
same year in which Margaret the elder sister
died, Matthew Paris chronicles the death of the
other sister Alice in almost identical words, and
styles her prioress. (fn. 11) This is a mistake of the
chronicler, who was then an old man, and not
infrequently recorded the same event twice in
the same year. Alice was never prioress. She
died in 1270. (fn. 12)
During the rule of Felicia, who succeeded
Margaret Rich as prioress, the death occurred of
William de Mauduit, earl of Warwick, 1267;
his body was buried at Westminster Abbey, but
his heart was sent for interment to the priory of
Catesby, (fn. 13) probably as a mark of special devotion
to St. Edmund of Canterbury, whose altar in the
conventual church was to some extent a place of
pilgrimage. An undated charter, probably about
this time, mentions a yearly rental of 2s. left to
the nuns of Catesby for the support of a lamp to
burn before the relics in their church. (fn. 14) Another
grant of 1276 bequeathed a rental of 30d. to
maintain a light before the image of St. Anne in
the priory church of Catesby. (fn. 15)
The first recorded admission of a superior of
this house by the diocesan is that of Amabilia in
1276, entered in the register of Bishop Gravesend, where mention is also made of brother Hugh
as master of the house. (fn. 16) In 1279 Henry de
Erdington bestowed on the convent the advow
son of the church of Yardley (Worcestershire)
on condition that the nuns should appoint a
canon of their house, as soon as the appropriation had been made, to say mass for him and his
family, and that he should be buried before the
altar in the chapel dedicated to St. Edmund of
Canterbury. There was, however, some difficulty about this appropriation, and not long after
the church of Yardley was bestowed on the
abbey of Merivale. (fn. 17)
The two succeeding heads, Isolda Hastings and
Biblisia, were both admitted by the bishop of
Lincoln. (fn. 18) Immediately upon the promotion of the
latter in March, 1290-1, the right of the priory
to the park of Westbury (Bucks) was disputed,
but the cause was decided in favour of the nuns. (fn. 19)
An entry in the Close Rolls under the year
1279 gives the enrolment of a grant by William
Bagot to Queen Eleanor of the advowson of the
priory of Catesby. (fn. 20) The cellaress of the house,
Joan of Northampton, was elected by the nuns
at the conclusion of the brief rule of Biblisia,
but licence not having been obtained first from
the diocesan, the bishop of Lincoln declared the
election void, but afterwards confirmed the same
on the ground of the merits of the said Joan, (fn. 21)
and similarly in 1310 on the election of Joan
of Ludham. (fn. 22) Building and repairing operations
were in progress, we read, in the early part of
the fourteenth century. In 1301 an indulgence
was granted by Bishop Dalderby to those helping
to rebuild the conventual church of the nuns of
Catesby, and the same bishop in 1312 granted
another indulgence to those who should assist in
paving the cloisters and house of the priory. (fn. 23)
With regard to masters or wardens, frequent
mention occurs of them. In 1286, Hugh, formerly master of the house of Catesby, (fn. 24) together
with the prioress and nuns, elected brother John
one of the canons. The master had the rule of
the house, admitting the canons, as well in spiritualities as in temporalities. This is shown by a
writ attached to the roll. (fn. 25) Robert of Wadington, canon of Canons Ashby, was appointed
master of the priory by Bishop Sutton in 1293,
and in the following year was succeeded by
William de Grutterworth, another canon of
Ashby. (fn. 26) In 1293 Bishop Sutton wrote to the
prioress of Catesby as to the absence of the
master, and the improper treatment of the prioress
of St. Michael's without Stamford, and certain
of her nuns whom the bishop had instituted as
nuns of Catesby. (fn. 27) Richard of Staverdon, canon
of Catesby, was appointed master in 1316, (fn. 28) in
succession to Roger of Daventry, 1297. It appears that lay brothers (conversi) were at one
time connected with this house, as well as canons
and wardens. In 1307 Bishop Dalderby wrote
to the bishop of London to procure the return
of Robert of Weston, a lay brother of Catesby
monastery, who took the habit of religion, but
after some time threw it aside, and for some ten
years past had lived in London with a certain
woman to the scandal of religion. At the same
time excommunication was pronounced against
Robert de Gretworth, also a canon of the same
house, who, under pretence of going to Rome,
had thrown aside the habit of religion, and
led a dissolute life. (fn. 29) It seems doubtful if the
office of master or warden was retained after the
fourteenth century, but so long as it lasted the
master appears to have been recognized as official
head of the priory in pecuniary matters. In
1310, when large supplies of victual by way of
loan were exacted from the heads of religious
houses in England for the expedition of Edward II.
into Scotland, the master of Catesby came eighth
on the list of the Northamptonshire houses,
between the priors of Daventry and Canons
Ashby. (fn. 30)
The priory received various evidences of royal
favour and consideration in connexion with the
exaction of aid or subsidy. In 1315 the crown
granted 'protection with clause nolumus' (fn. 31) for
one year to the prioress of Catesby or rector of
the church of Basford, and the same to the vicar
of Basford; a general protection for all her possessions was granted to the prioress for two years
in 1316. (fn. 32) In March, 1321-2, Edward II.
ordered his ministers to levy nothing from the
prioress of Catesby, and to restore anything they
might have levied by virtue of a general levy of
500 marks from the knights and squires of
Northamptonshire, as it was not his intention
that anything should be levied from the prioress
or other religious who held in frankalmoign free
from aid or tallage with the community of the
county. (fn. 33)
There was considerable dispute from time to
time with regard to the patronage of the churches
of Catesby and Canons Ashby. On 21 March,
1389, Dr. Walter Gibbes, as commissary-general
of the archbishop of Canterbury, in the course of
his visitation of Lincoln diocese came to the
priory of Canons Ashby, and he then gave a
formal certificate that, having inspected their
instruments, he found that the prioress and convent of Catesby did rightfully possess the parish
churches of Catesby and Ashby. (fn. 34)
A full statement of the accounts of Catesby
Priory in the year 1415 and during the rule of
Elizabeth Swynford possesses many points of
interest. There were no arrears of rent; the
chief receipts were: From rents of lands,
£43 9s. 6d.; from farms and tolls of wind- and
water-mills, £29 2s. 1d., the payments being
made in kind, such as wheat, maslin, barley,
pigs, geese, and hens; from oblations at the altar
of St. Edmund, 7s. 4d.; from issues of the
manor of Catesby, chiefly wool and hides,
£24 8s. 8d.; and from court perquisites and
fines 24s. 8d., yielding a total of receipts of
£98 3s. 6d. The expenses, given in the greatest
detail, amounted to £94 1s. 7½d. Tallow for
candles cost 2s.; pitchers, 8d.; 2,000 slates
bought at Chorlton, 8s. 4d.; 700 tiles bought
at Coventry, 4s. 6d.; a tablecloth for the hall,
1s. 10d.; a cow bought at Daventry, 6s. 8d.;
four skins of parchment, 1s. 2d.; 18 pounds of
wax, 10s. 6d.; 4 pounds of cotton, 4s. 4d. A
man's wages for walling was 2d. a day, and
hired women were paid 1d. a day. (fn. 35)
On the death of Prioress Agnes Terry in 1431
the bishop gave leave for the election of a successor. (fn. 36) Her name is not known, but in January,
1444-5, she was suspended from office and administration by the diocesan, who granted a commission for an inspection of the accounts of the
house to the abbot of St. James, Northampton.
The administration of the priory was committed
to Agnes Allesby and Isabel Benett, nuns of the
house; (fn. 37) both eventually became superiors in succession.
On 27 September, 1535, John Tregonnell
wrote to Cromwell giving a rapid digest of his
recent monastic visits, in which the following
passage occurs: 'Catesby, a house of nuns of the
Cistercian order, has £90 lands yearly, and is
under the jurisdiction of the bishop of Lincoln,
by usurpation I suppose, as the order has always
been exempt. The prioress and sisters are free
from suspicion.' (fn. 38) The local commissioners, when
they visited Catesby on 12 May, 1536, on the
eve of the dissolution of the smaller houses, were
so struck with its admirable condition that they
felt constrained to anticipate their general report,
and forwarded a letter to the chancellor of the
Court of Augmentations direct from the priory,
wherein they stated, 'The house of Catesby we
founde in very perfect order, the prioress a sure,
wyse, discrete, and very religious woman with
ix nunnys under her obedyencye, as religious and
devoute and as good obedyencye as we have in
tyme past seen or be lyke shall see. The seid
house standyth in suche a quarter muche to the
releff of the kynges people and his graces pore
subjectes their lykewyse much relieved. Only the
reporte of dyvers worshyppfulles were thereunto
adjoining us; of alle other yt ys to us openly declared. Wherefore yf yt should please the kynges
highnesses to have remorse that any suche religious house shall stande, we thinke his grace
cannot appoynt any house more mete to share
his most gracious charitie and pity on than the
said house of Catesby. Further, ye shall understand that as to her bounden dewtye towards
the kynges highness in this his affayres, also for
discrete entertainment of us his commyssioners
and our company, we have not found nor belyke
shall fynde any such of more dyscrecion . . .
From Catesby the xii day off this present moneth
off May. Edmund Knyghtley, John Lane,
George Giffard, Robert Burgoyn.' (fn. 39)
This favourable notice in no way softened the
king's heart or turned him from his object. On
19 June, George Giffard, writing to Cromwell
from Garendon Abbey, complained that the king,
when he read their letter as to Catesby Priory,
remarked, 'It was like we had received rewards
which caused us to write as we did.' (fn. 40) The
commissioners were ordered to return to Catesby
and complete their task. George Giffard wrote
again to Cromwell from Catesby on 27 June,
saying they were there 'to begin our suppression,'
but even then they seemed to regret the work of
ejection, and asked whether a letter from the
chancellor of the Augmentations Office was a
sufficient warrant for them to proceed. (fn. 41) Though
ejected that year there must have been some
further delay, for the nuns were still in possession three months from the last date given. The
poor prioress Joyce, 'a right sad matron,' according to Dr. Tregonnell, in her despair not only
offered to buy her house off the king for 2,000
marks, but offered Cromwell 100 marks to buy
him a gelding, with an additional promise (it is
to be feared of small attraction) that if he would
save her house he should have her life-long
prayers and those of all her sisters. (fn. 42) Cruel as it
may seem, it was probably as well that the poor
lady did not obtain her desire, as further delay
could only have proved a treacherous delusion.
Before the end of the year the work of destruction was accomplished. The prioress, to whom was
granted a pension of £20, with her nine nuns
and twenty-six dependents, was turned out; plate
was seized to the value of £29 4s., furniture,
vestments, and other ornaments and goods of the
church and buildings £400, lead torn from the
roofs £110, and £3 for the broken metal of two
hand bells. (fn. 43)
Prioresses of Catesby
Margaret Rich, (fn. 44) elected 1245, died 1257
Felicia, (fn. 45) occurs 1259, died 1275
Mabel, (fn. 46) elected 1275, resigned 1284
Isolda Hastings, (fn. 47) elected 1284-5, resigned
1290-1
Biblisia, (fn. 48) elected 1290-1, died 1291
Joan of Northampton, (fn. 49) elected 1291, died
1311
Joan of Ludham, (fn. 50) elected 1311, resigned 1338
Alice of Rolleston, (fn. 51) elected 1338, died 1344
Katherine de Boydon, (fn. 52) elected 1344, died
1349
Orabel of Raundes, (fn. 53) elected 1349, died 1361
Joan Fabian, (fn. 54) elected 1361, died 1370
Joan Ashby, (fn. 55) elected 1370
Elizabeth Swynford, (fn. 56) elected 1405
Agnes Terry, (fn. 57) died 1431
Agnes Allesby, (fn. 58) elected 1452-3
Isabel Benett, (fn. 59) occurs 1468
Amabilia, (fn. 60) occurs 1471
Joan, (fn. 61) occurs 1495
Joyce Bekeley, (fn. 62) occurs 1510, surrendered 1563
The pointed oval seal ad causas of the
priory taken from a cast at the British Museum, (fn. 63)
with an indistinct and imperfect impression, represents the Virgin seated on a throne in a
canopied niche, the Child on her left knee. In
base under a trefoiled arch the prior in prayer to
the left.