ECCLES
|
|
|
| BARTON |
PENDLETON |
CLIFTON |
| WORSLEY |
PENDLEBURY |
|
The ancient parish of Eccles measures about 7
miles across, from the Irwell south-west to the Glazebrook, and has an area of 22,004 acres. The position
of the church, from which the parish takes its name,
was fairly central for the portion of the district
habitable in former times, while the great area of moss
land in the west was still unreclaimed, being close to
the boundary between Pendleton, Pendlebury, and
Clifton on the east, and the large areas of Worsley
and Barton on the west. The general slope of the
surface is from north to south, the highest land, about
300 ft. above sea level, being in the stretch of higher
ground between Worsley and Kearsley.
The parish was anciently divided into three 'quarters'—Barton, Worsley, and Pendleton, assessed for
the county lay of 1624 at £3 19s. 8½d., £2 18s. 3d.,
and £3 5s. 4¾d. respectively, when the hundred paid
£100. (fn. 1) For the 'fifteenth' the townships paid as
follows:—Barton, including Farnworth, £1 12s.;
Worsley, £1 1s.; Pendleton, 13s. 6d.; Pendlebury,
5s.; Clifton, 7s., or £3 18s. 6d. out of £41 14s. 4d.
for the hundred. (fn. 2)
Though the parish is of great extent, and lies near
Manchester and Bolton, its particular history has been
uneventful. There was a skirmish at Woolden in the
Civil War, and in 1745 the Young Pretender's army
passed through in its advance and retreat. The
geological formation of the southern and central part
of the parish consists of the New Red Sandstone, the
northern part of the Permian Rocks and Coal Measures. Coal mines have been worked from the 16th
century, and perhaps earlier. In the 18th century
the Worsley navigation schemes led to a great development of mines, and later of manufactures, and Eccles
and Pendleton have shared in the growth of Manchester trade. The following is the apportionment
of agricultural land within the ancient parish: Arable
land, 7,587 acres; permanent grass, 5, 914; woods
and plantations, 716. (fn. 3)
Chat Moss remained waste until the beginning of
the last century. (fn. 4) Defoe, who passed it on the way
from Warrington to Manchester early in the 18th
century, has given a description of it. It stretched
along the road for 5 or 6 miles, the surface looked
black and dirty, and it was 'indeed frightful to think
of, for it would bear neither horse nor man, unless in
an exceeding dry season, and then so as not to be
travelled over with safety.' The land was entirely
waste, 'except for the poor cottagers' fuel, and the
quantity used for that was very small.' (fn. 5) Leland and
Camden tell of a great eruption of the moss in the
time of Henry VIII. (fn. 6) The carrying of the Liverpool
and Manchester Railway over Chat Moss in 1830 was
considered a great triumph of engineering. (fn. 7) The
whole has now been reclaimed. (fn. 8) The corporation of
Manchester has a sewage farm there.
Dr. Aikin says of Eccles in 1795:—
The agriculture of the parish is chiefly confined to grazing, and
would be more materially benefited by draining; but the tax
upon brick, a most essential article in this process, has been a
very great hindrance to it. The use of lime—imported from
Wales, and brought by the inland navigations to the neighbourhood of our collieries—has become very general in the improvement of the meadow and pasture lands … The advance of
population in the parish of Eccles [the effect of the great demand
for hands in our manufactures] has been attended with a due
care respecting public worship and the religious education of
children… . The excellent institutions of Sunday schools were
early patronised in Eccles parish, and continue to receive the
steady and liberal support of the parishioners. There are now,
it is calculated, near one thousand children regularly taught in
these schools, and with very considerable improvement. (fn. 9)
Eccles gives a name to one of the parliamentary
divisions of the county formed of this parish and
Flixton; it returns one member.

INDEX MAP to the PARISHES of ECCLES and FLIXTON.
There are three newspapers published at Eccles, the
Advertiser, established 1853; the Journal, 1874; and
the Telegraph.
CHURCH
The church of ST. MARY stands on
elevated ground about 200 yds. to the
north of the old market-place, and
consists of chancel with north and south aisles, south
transept with vestry on the east side, nave with north
and south aisles, south porch, and west tower. There
is also a building, now used as a strong-room and
motor-house, with entrance porch, on the north side
of the north chancel aisle.
The whole of the east end of the church has been
rebuilt in modern times, but west of the chancel arch
the building, except the tower and south aisle, is of
early 16th-century date with some traces of 14th-century work at the entrance to the rebuilt
south transept. The tower belongs to the 15th
century, and possibly incorporates in its lower stage
the masonry of an older structure.
The earliest parts of the building are the responds
of the arch to the south transept in St. Katherine's
Chapel, which are of 14th-century date, and may
belong to the year 1368, when the chapel was
founded. These form the only remaining fragment
of a church which probably consisted of a chancel with
north chapel and nave with south aisle, to which this
chantry was added. Owing to the rebuilding of
1862–3 at the east end evidence of the extent of this
early church is wanting, but both the chancel and nave
seem to have been of the same length as at present,
though of less width. The east wall of the north
chapel, however, appears to have been standing up to
1861 in a line with the east wall of the chancel, and
contained a good 14th-century window, of which
the present window in the same position is said to
be a copy. (fn. 10) Whether this earlier church had a
north aisle it is impossible to say, and its south aisle
was most likely narrower than the present one,
though there is nothing actually to show that the arch
to the south transept is not in its original position.
If it is, the aisle must have been of almost equal
width to the nave, which is unlikely. There was
probably a west tower to the 14th-century church,
but no positive evidence of this remains, successive
rebuildings and restorations making it almost impossible to say whether the lower portion of the present
tower is older than the upper part. Whatever the
original western termination may have been, however,
the tower was built, or rebuilt, centring with the
nave, probably in the beginning of the 15th century,
and at the same time, or shortly afterwards, the north
aisle was added or reconstructed. The Jesus altar stood
here. This aisle was lighted at its west end by a three-light window with cinquefoiled heads under a fourcentred arch, the remains of which may still be seen
blocked up on the outside. Later in the same century,
probably about 1450, when William and Lawrence
Booth founded (or refounded) a second chantry of St.
Katherine, the south aisle seems to have been rebuilt
further southward. The evidence of the old plinth, now
restored, showed it to be a later addition, and it is likely
that the entrance to St. Katherine's Chapel was at this
time taken down and reconstructed in its present position. That the south aisle is earlier in date than the
16th-century rebuilding, which brought the church
to its present shape, is shown by the windows, whose
jambs are moulded, in contrast with the plain chamfered jambs of the later work, and by the generally
better and more careful detail as shown in the
hood-moulds to the windows and in the buttresses,
which had cusped panelled fronts. In the rebuilding
of this wall much, if not all, of the old detail has
been lost, the middle buttress having disappeared, and
the diagonal one at the south-west having been renewed.

Plan of Eccles Church
The south aisle of the chancel, if it did not exist
before, must have been built some time in the 15th
century, and is probably the 'new chapel' which was
built by Sir Geoffrey Massey, who died in 1457, having
founded a chantry at the Trinity altar there in 1453.
The old views of the church show the south chancel
aisle with a three-light 15th-century window similar
to that in the west end of the north aisle, together
with a priest's door with a pointed head and hood-mould in the south-west corner.
It is possible that the south arcade of the nave was
rebuilt at the same time as the south aisle was enlarged, but this would mean that the work then
executed was taken down within forty or fifty years.
It is more likely that the original north and south
arcade stood till the beginning of the 16th century,
when the great rebuilding of the church commenced. (fn. 11)
The south arcade was the first to be taken down, and
was reconstructed with a lofty clearstory on the same
line. The north arcade was afterwards pushed out
5 ft. to the north, bringing the north aisle wall flush
with the wall of the north chapel of the chancel, and
throwing the tower out of centre with the nave.
Whether there had been a chancel arch before this
date it is impossible to say, but the chancel seems to
have been reconstructed without one at this time or
shortly after, and similarly widened to the north. The
evidence of this was much more plain before the rebuilding of 1862–3 by the way in which the roof of
the old chancel cut into that of the north chapel. (fn. 12) The
axis of the chancel is twisted about 18 in. to the south,
but whether this took place during the 16th-century
rebuilding, or was so originally, there is nothing to
show, and the south arcade of the chancel may be on
the exact line of the former one. The only fixed
point in the church through the various rebuildings
seems to be the south pier between the chancel and
nave, though this of course was only built in its
present form in the 16th-century reconstruction.
The arches and piers of the chancel are similar to
those of the nave, but the arches are much wider and
higher, leaving no space for the clearstory like that
of the nave, unless the roof were taken very much
higher. But the unfinished end of the nave roof as
shown in old views of the church seems to suggest
that it was intended to carry it on over the chancel,
the two octagonal turrets alone marking the division
of nave and chancel on the outside.
The building as finished in the first part of the
16th century remained more or less intact until 1801
when the taking down of the east end was begun
prior to reconstruction. Many alterations, however,
took place in the interior between these two dates,
the first in 1595, when new pews and forms were set
up. At this date, too, there were 'repairs to the
church,' which probably included the insertion of much
of the window tracery. In 1713 the church was
'beautified,' and in 1715 the vestry, which had
been in the south aisle of the chancel, was removed
to the west end under the tower. In 1717 a west
gallery was ordered to be erected, and at the same
time or shortly after the building was again thoroughly
repaired. The roof was releaded in 1719. In 1770
north and south galleries were ordered to be erected,
and in 1790 the south porch was restored. A gallery
was erected at the east end of the nave in 1803 excluding any view of the chancel, but this was removed
in 1862. The other galleries still remain. There were
further repairs in 1832, 1846, 1854, and 1856, the
nave roof being repaired and the lead recast, new
roofs constructed to the aisles, and the old flagged
floor relaid. (fn. 13) In 1862–3 the east end was entirely
rebuilt and a small clearstory of three triangular-shaped
lights added to the chancel walls. The work comprised the reconstruction of the chancel with its north
and south aisles, the addition of a vestry on the north,
and an organ chamber on the south, and the rebuilding of St. Katherine's Chapel, which had long been
destroyed. (fn. 14) Three large circular 18th-century windows, formerly lighting the south gallery, were built
up at this time, but their position may still be seen
from the inside. The organ, formerly in the west
gallery, was transferred to the chamber on the south
side of the south chancel aisle and remained there till
1890, when a new one was erected on screens in the
first and second bay on each side of the chancel, and
the organ chamber turned into a vestry. At the same
time the vestry on the north was converted to its
present use. The organ chamber seems to have been
erected prior to the rebuilding of St. Katherine's
Chapel, as its west wall was built as an outside wall,
as may be seen by the diagonal buttress and the
blocked-up windows on that side. St. Katherine's
Chapel, which is supposed to be on the site of the
original chantry chapel, now forms a south transept.
The church is built of friable red sandstone, which
had decayed so badly that an almost complete refacing
of the old part became necessary in 1907. The work
was completed in 1908, and very little of the exterior
detail is now left. The interior was, till 1875, covered
with an accumulated coat of limewash, but was then
stripped and all its stonework cleaned. Externally
the walls of the nave and aisles have battlemented
parapets and the roofs are covered with lead. The
aisles have lean-to roofs with a straight parapet on their
west end. The walls of the chancel, south chapel
and aisle, and transept also terminate in battlements,
and the vestry has a stepped gable on the south side.
The roofs of the chancel and chancel aisles are
covered with slates, but those of the vestry and transept
are leaded. The south aisle of the chancel has a lean-to
roof, but the roof of the north aisle retains its original
gable form.
The chancel is 43 ft. long by 23 ft. 6 in. wide and
has north and south arcades of two bays with centre
pier and east and west responds. The arches are
16 ft. 6 in. wide, and there is a piece of straight wall
at the east end 4 ft. long. The columns and arches
are similar to those in the nave, but the capitals are
slightly different. The first bay from the west on
each side is filled with a modern screen with an organ
over and a similar screen partly fills the eastern bav.
The east window is a modern traceried one of five
lights in the style of the 15th century and belongs
with the clearstory and roof to the 1862–3 rebuilding. The fittings are all modern and are of no
particular interest. The chancel arch is a modern
insertion of two chamfered orders springing high up
from shafts corbelled out from the large octagonal
piers which separate the nave from the chancel.
The pier on the south side is 4 ft. 6 in. in diameter
with a respond on its east and west faces and is built
solid. That on the north side is bigger and contains
a staircase leading to the roof, entered from the
north aisle. On the outside these piers are carried
up above the roof and are finished with pyramidal
stone roofs and finials. The north aisle of the
chancel, which is 17 ft. 6 in. wide, retains no
ancient features, but has a copy of the five-light
14th-century window with reticulated tracery already
mentioned at its east end. It has two three-light
windows on the north side and a door to the strong
room, with an outer door in the north-west corner to
the west of the old vestry. The south aisle of the
chancel, which is 16 ft. wide, has a three-light window
at the east end and two three-light windows on the south
side. The old organ chamber (present vestry) is built
out to the south at its west end and is separated from
it by a screen. The aisle contains a monument to
Richard Brereton and his wife, described below.
The nave measures 60 ft. in length and 23 ft. 3 in.
in width and is of four bays with north and south
arcades having octagonal shafts 2 ft. 6 in. in diameter,
their longer sides measuring 18 in. and the shorter
5 in., set diagonally. The longer sides have a hollow
moulding stopping under the capitals, which are of a
plain block character with upper and two lower fillets,
and are carved with plain shields, three on each
face. The capitals of the easternmost pier of the north
arcade and of the east respond are slightly different,
having only the upper and lower round fillet and two
shields on each face. The arches are pointed and of
two plain chamfered orders. On each side there are
four pointed five-light clearstory windows of very
poor detail. The jambs and heads are chamfered and
there is no external hood-mould, while the tracery is
straight and without cuspings. The sills of the
windows on the inside are more than 2 ft. above the
crown of the nave arcade, but they were formerly
much lower, as may be seen by a straight joint at each
side. In the recent restoration it was found that the
jambs of the windows were continued below the
present sills, these having been probably inserted at
the time that the galleries were built, when the roofs
of the aisles were raised in order to get head room.
Two courses of masonry between the crowns of the
nave arches and the sills of the windows above mark
the former level of the clearstory.
On the east wall of the tower the line of the
14th-century steep-pitched roof may still be seen,
together with the places where the purlins were
housed into the wall. The roof of the nave is of flat
pitch and probably retains a good deal of the original
16th-century timber, but it was repaired in 1846 and
the decayed pieces replaced. The north-east diagonal
buttress of the tower, the lower part of which has been
cut away, is now an internal feature, together with
the string-course marking the upper or belfry stage,
with the lower part of a small window above. The
tower arch is of two chamfered orders, the outer one
of which is stopped at the springing, and is filled in
behind the west gallery with a modern wood sevenlight traceried window. Under the gallery a modern
doorway has been inserted. The west walls of the
north and south aisles are not bonded in with the
tower, (fn. 15) and it is possible that an extension of the
nave westward or a rebuilding of the tower was contemplated by the 16th-century builders.
The two east piers of the north arcade and the east
pier and east respond of the south arcade have canopied
niches in the sides facing south-west (towards the
entrance). The niches are empty, but show conclusively that the piers are of pre-Reformation date. (fn. 16)
They are 3 ft. 6 in. high, and the shelf, which has a
plain shield under, is 5 ft. 3 in. from the ground. The
niche on the east respond of the south aisle, opposite
St. Katherine's Chapel, has carved on either side a
hammer and pincers together with a small cogged
wheel, possibly with reference to St. Katherine. (fn. 17) The
west pier of the north aisle has a stone bracket about
6 ft. 6 in. from the ground.
The west and south galleries are in line with the
centre of the piers, but the north gallery is set back
about 6 ft. behind the arcade and rests on small iron
pillars. The north and south galleries retain their
18th-century pews, and are approached from the west
end of each aisle by staircases.
The 14th-century responds of the arch to the south
transept have been already mentioned. The capitals
are modern, but are probably copies of the originals,
and the arch over is a four-centred one of two rounded
orders. The chapel is modern and has a four-light
window on the south and one of two lights on the
west. The south aisle has two three-light windows
with moulded jambs and hood-moulds, as before mentioned. The mullions and tracery, however, are of
late date like those of the other windows of the church.
In the upper lights portions of the tracery have been
cut away as in other parts of the building. Each
aisle has a five-light window at its west end, and
the north aisle is lighted by four five-light windows
along its north side, all of which have been renewed.
The south porch appears originally to have been
erected in the 15th century with the south aisle, but
the front part was rebuilt in 1790, which date is carved
upon it. The inner door is old, of thick oak and
nail-studded. The outer iron gates were set up in
1809.
The tower is rather squat and of two stages, being
divided about midway by a string-course. It has
diagonal buttresses of four stages, moulded plinth,
and embattled parapet with angle and intermediate
pinnacles. There is a vice in the south-west corner,
entered from the outside. Externally the tower is
20 ft. square, but the walls not being of equal thickness,
its internal dimensions are 11 ft. by 12 ft. 6 in. The
west doorway, which has a pointed arch, has been
rebuilt, and above, separated from it by a string-course
between the buttresses, is a three-light pointed
window with hood-mould, which is said to have originally shown signs of well-designed cusping. This had
been hacked off outside, but remained on the inside to
the ringing chamber. The window, which was of
15th-century date has, however, been entirely reconstructed and the ancient detail lost. The lower stage
of the tower has a single-light window on the north
side, but on the south is quite plain except for the
door to the vice. The belfry stage has a three-light
square-headed stone louvred window on each face,
with a clock face below on the north, south, and west
sides.
The fittings, including the font and the pulpit, are
all modern, dating principally from 1862–3 and subsequent years. There are no traces of ancient ritual
arrangements. In 1856, when the old flagged floor
was relaid, two sepulchral slabs, one with a raised and
the other with an incised cross, were found near the
third column from the east on the south side of the
nave at a depth of 2 ft. 6 in. These slabs now stand
in the west porch under the tower at each side of the
inner doorway. (fn. 18)
The monument of Richard Brereton and his wife
was erected by the latter in 1600 and stands at the
east end of the south aisle of the chancel, but is not
in its original position. It is an altar tomb with
recumbent figures, the man being in armour with
helmet by his side and the lady in a ruff and with an
enormous headdress. There is a figure of a child
on a bracket on the south side of the tomb, around
which runs the inscription.
Besides the Brereton monument there is an old
brass to the Dauntesey family on the south side of the
chancel arch, and a painted wooden shield emblazoned
with the arms of George Legh (d. 1674) at the west
end of the north aisle. (fn. 19)
There is no ancient stained glass.
There is a ring of eight bells. Four are mentioned
in the inventory of Edward VI, but these were removed in 1709 and a new ring of six substituted.
One of these bearing the inscription 'Prosperity to
this church' still remains amongst the present ring.
The tenor has the inscription: 'I to the church the
living call and to the grave do summon all.' The
curfew is still rung every night.
The plate consists of two chalices of 1618, with
the date inscribed on each below the rim; a paten of
1681 with the date and names of the churchwardens;
a flagon of 1723, inscribed 'Eccles Parish 1723';
another flagon of the year following inscribed 'Eccles
Parish 1724'; an almsdish of 1777 inscribed 'This
Dish given as a gratuity From the Several Inhabitants
of Barton for the use of the Parish Church of Eccles
1777'; a paten of 1862–3 presented by Mr. Henry
Blacklock, inscribed with the names of the donor and
churchwardens, and the date 1863; and a chalice,
paten, and flagon, silver gilt, of 1893.
The registers begin in 1563 (baptisms and burials
1563, marriages 1564). (fn. 20)
In the chancel are the banners of the Trafford
House and Hulme Hall Local Militia, and the Eccles
Corps of the Manchester and Salford Infantry Volunteers 1798.
The churchyard on the south and east sides is of
great extent and is now completely paved with gravestones. As late as the 18th century the church stood
amongst fields, and the churchyard was planted with
fir trees, but in 1806 it was levelled and the headstones laid flat. The churchyard coming to be regarded as a common playground, the greater part of
it was inclosed in 1886–7 by the erection of iron
palisading and the public restricted to footpaths
running from the north to the south and the east
to the west entrances. The aspect of the churchyard
is very desolate, though trees and shrubs have been
planted. The principal entrance is from the street
on the south-west by a flight of steps under a wroughtiron screen gateway bearing the royal arms and the
date 1815, but set up in the year following at a cost
of £49.
ADVOWSON
Something of the early history of
the rectory can be gleaned from the
charters of Whalley Abbey. It appears that just as the greater part of the parish, though
under different titles, had by 1200 been acquired by
the Barton family, so the patronage of the rectory was
in their hands, partly perhaps in right of Barton and
partly in right of Worsley. (fn. 21) At all events, the rectory
had been divided into at least four portions, held
usually by 'clerks' who were married and whose sons
no doubt expected to succeed. (fn. 22) Priests as chaplains
would have to be employed for mass and other rites, (fn. 23)
the clerks themselves no doubt taking their share in
those services for which holy orders were not necessary.
That 'the clerks of Eccles church' were a regularly
established body is shown by the grant of rights of
common in the manor of Barton made by Gilbert de
Notton and Edith his wife. (fn. 24) 'G. and H., W. and
T., clerks of Eccles,' as holding the rectory, sanctioned
the opening of a chapel at Worsley before 1233. (fn. 25)
The initials no doubt stand for Geoffrey de Byron,
Hugh, William, and Thomas. Hugh and Thomas
must therefore have divided the fourth part of the
rectory between them. The former was son of Ellis
de Worsley, and was probably married, as his daughter
Ellen inherited his property. (fn. 26) Thomas seems to have
been the only priest, and unmarried. He may be
identified with the 'Master T. de Eccles' who attested
a grant by Gilbert de Notton and Edith his wife. (fn. 27)
The prohibition of hereditary succession to benefices and the requirement that those who held a benefice which a priest should serve must within a limited
time be advanced to the priesthood put an end to the
customary arrangements at Eccles. In 1234 Gilbert
de Barton granted to his lord, John de Lacy, Earl of
Lincoln, the advowson of the church of Eccles, (fn. 28) and
Lacy at once conferred it upon Stanlaw Abbey. (fn. 29)
Some of the clerks who held the rectory seem to have
been induced to resign, or were perhaps otherwise provided for; (fn. 30) episcopal and papal ratifications were
obtained, (fn. 31) and a vicarage duly ordained. (fn. 32)
From this time until the suppression of Whalley,
the rectory remained in the possession of the monks.
In 1291 the revenues were taxed as £20 a year, (fn. 33) and
in 1341 the ninth of the sheaves, &c., was found to
be £15 7s. (fn. 34) In 1534 the gross value was returned
as £57 2s., (fn. 35) but about 1540, after the rectory had
come into the king's hands, the net revenue from the
glebe and tithe was found to be £104. (fn. 36) A division
now was made; the tithes and other revenues of the
rectory were leased out and afterwards sold, (fn. 37) but the
advowson was retained by the Crown and presentations
are now made by the Lord Chancellor. An independent vicarage was created in the chapelry of Deane,
thus increasing the royal patronage.
The vicarage of Eccles was formally constituted in
1277; a competent dwelling-house was ordered to be
provided, the land occupied by the de facto vicar was
secured, and a pension of 16 marks assigned to him
from the revenues of the church. (fn. 38) This pension continued to be paid by the monks of Whalley, (fn. 39) and then
by the Crown, but on the sale of the rectory it was
increased to £16 13s. 4d., which is still paid. (fn. 40) The
Commonwealth surveyors in 1650 found the tithes
of Eccles to be worth about £170; they had been
sequestered by the authorities for the 'delinquency'
of the impropriator, who had been accustomed to pay
£18 a year to the vicar. They recommended that
Ellenbrook Chapel should have a parish assigned to it,
that a new church should be built at Irlam, and that
some re-arrangement of the other boundaries should
be made. (fn. 41) With the growth of Manchester the value
of the glebe increased, and the income of the vicarage,
which in 1718 was under £46, (fn. 42) has now become
£700. (fn. 43)
The following is a list of the vicars:—
|
|
Instituted |
Name |
Patron |
Cause of Vacancy |
| oc. |
1277 |
Roger (fn. 44)
|
—— |
—— |
| oc. |
1284 |
John (fn. 45)
|
—— |
—— |
| oc. |
1294 |
William the Parker (fn. 46)
|
—— |
—— |
| oc. |
1310–15 |
Simon (fn. 47)
|
—— |
—— |
| 25 July 1320 |
Adam de Blackburn (fn. 48)
|
Abbot of Whalley |
—— |
| 31 Oct. 1349 |
John de Mulnegate (fn. 49)
|
" |
d. A. de Blackburn |
| 10 June 1372 |
Robert de Monton (fn. 50)
|
" |
d. J. de Mulnegate |
| oc. |
1383 |
John de Craunton (fn. 51)
|
—— |
—— |
| oc. |
1402 |
John de York (fn. 52)
|
—— |
—— |
| — |
— |
John de Moreland |
—— |
—— |
| 8 Feb. 1412–13 |
Richard Ewood (fn. 53)
|
—— |
res. J. de Moreland |
| 5 Nov. 1456 |
Robert Lawe (fn. 54)
|
Abbot of Whalley |
d. R. Ewood |
| 12 Apl. 1471 |
Christopher Whitehead (fn. 55)
|
" |
res. R. Lawe |
| 1474 |
Thomas Wright (fn. 56)
|
Bishop of Lichfield |
—— |
| 8 Mar. 1504–5 |
Thomas Holgate (fn. 57)
|
Abbot of Whalley |
d. T. Wright |
| oc. |
1534–54 |
Thomas Crane (fn. 58)
|
—— |
—— |
| — |
— 1557 |
Edward Pendleton, B. Gram. (fn. 59)
|
The Crown |
res. T. Crane |
| 20 June 1559 |
| 7 Dec. 1576 |
Thomas Williamson, M.A. (fn. 60)
|
The Crown |
d. E. Pendleton |
| 20 May 1606 |
John White, D.D. (fn. 61)
|
" |
d. T. Williamson |
| 9 Jan. 1610–11 |
John Jones, D.D. (fn. 62)
|
—— |
res. J. White |
| ? 1659 |
Edmund Jones, B.A. (fn. 63)
|
—— |
—— |
| 19 Nov. 1662 |
Robert Hartley, M.A. (fn. 64)
|
The Crown |
exp. E. Jones |
| 25 July 1671 |
Thomas Usherwood (fn. 65)
|
" |
—— |
| 24 Aug. 1678 |
Thomas Hall, M.A. (fn. 66)
|
" |
d. T. Usherwood |
| 10 Jan. 1721–2 |
Thomas Chaddock, B.A. (fn. 67)
|
" |
d. T. Hall |
| 8 Jan. 1724–5 |
Thomas Bell |
" |
d. T. Chaddock |
| 27 Nov. 1725 |
William Crooke (fn. 68)
|
" |
—— |
| 27 July 1726 |
Thomas Vaughan, M. A. (fn. 69)
|
" |
—— |
| 9 Mar. 1747–8 |
Benjamin Nicholls, M.A. (fn. 70)
|
" |
d. T. Vaughan |
| 3 June 1765 |
Cudworth Poole (fn. 71)
|
" |
d. B. Nicholls |
| 27 Dec. 1768 |
John Crookhall, B.A. (fn. 72)
|
" |
d. C. Poole |
| 31 Oct. 1792 |
John Clowes, M.A. (fn. 73)
|
" |
d. J. Crookhall |
| 9 Apl. 1818 |
Thomas Blackburne, M.A. (fn. 74)
|
" |
d. J. Clowes |
| 8 Apl. 1837 |
William Marsden, B.D. (fn. 75)
|
" |
res. T. Blackburne |
| Feb. 1861 |
James Pelham Pitcairn, M.A. (fn. 76)
|
The Crown |
d. W. Marsden |
| — |
—1893 |
Hon. Arthur Temple Lyttelton, M.A. (fn. 77)
|
" |
d. J. P. Pitcairn |
| — |
—1899 |
Frederic D'Austini Cremer, M.A. (fn. 78)
|
" |
prom. A. T. Lyttelton |
Before the Reformation the regular staff consisted
of the vicar, who was bound to reside, and three
chantry priests; there were, however, others residing
in the parish, and at the visitation of 1548 seven
names were recorded, while six appeared in 1554.
The old priests dying out, there were only four at the
visitation of 1563; viz. Edward Pendleton, the conforming vicar, who had also to attend to the school at
Manchester; his curate; George Wirrall, the survivor
of the chantry priests; and John Pilsworth, chaplain of the Lady Brereton of Tatton. Two years
later the curate had disappeared, his place being taken
by 'a reader'; George Wirrall still survived, but the
chaplain had no mention. (fn. 79) The parish church and
the chapel at Ellenbrook were probably served for
some time by the vicar and a licensed reader. In
1592 it was stated that the vicar, Thomas Williamson,
did not wear the surplice, and the warden was enjoined
to offer it to him 'so often as he shall hap to minister
the sacraments.' Two men were presented for abusing
one another in time of divine service, and giving bad
words to 'the reader.' (fn. 80)
It was not long before things improved somewhat,
for in 1610 the vicar and the incumbent of Ellenbrook were both 'preachers.' (fn. 81) In 1650 the parish
church had two ministers, but Ellenbrook, which was
not endowed, had sometimes 'a preaching minister'
and sometimes not. (fn. 82) Little or no change seems to
have been made until last century. (fn. 83) Many of the
18th-century vicars were non-resident, the curate of
the parish church and the minister of Ellenbrook
composing the working staff. The first additional
church was that at Pendleton in 1776.
Attached to the parish church there were formerly
several chantries. That at the altar of the Trinity
in the south chancel aisle was founded by Sir Geoffrey
Massey of Worsley in 1453, for a priest 'to celebrate
mass and divers obsequies for the souls of him and his
antecessors.' The endowment, £4 8s., was derived
from lands at Wigan and in Cheshire. (fn. 84) The Booths
of Barton founded more important chantries about
the same time. Lawrence Booth, Bishop of Durham
1457 to 1480, secured the king's licence in 1450 to
found a perpetual chantry at the altar of St. Katherine
in Eccles Church; (fn. 85) there were to be two chaplains,
and a rent of 24 marks was assigned for their support.
In addition to their special duties, on double feasts
the chaplains were to take part in the procession with
the other priests and celebrate the canonical hours
'in their surplices, with note devoutly and with
skill, within the choir of the church.' (fn. 86) An appropriation of the rectory of Slaidburn was obtained,
but lost again, and this chantry failed about 1510. (fn. 87)
Lawrence's half-brother, William Booth, Archbishop
of York 1452 to 1464, secured in 1460 the appropriation of Beetham rectory to the new chantry or
college of Jesus and the Blessed Virgin Mary, for
which the Jesus Chapel was built on the north side
of the chancel. A house of residence adjoined for
the use of the chaplains. (fn. 88) At the time of the
Suppression the clear revenue was £20 1s. 8d., out
of which the two chaplains or 'fellows' received
each 10 marks, the 'conduct' or assistant priest had
7 marks, and 20s. was given in alms. The incumbents were bound to celebrate mass daily in the
chapel and 'maintain the choir' at divine service,
and all three, 'by the occasion of the large circuit of
the said parish and the vicar thereof not [being] able
to minister to all the same' were 'enforced often and
many times to minister sacraments to the parishioners.' (fn. 89)
Jesus Chapel was acquired by the Traffords, and Trinity
Chapel by the lords of Worsley, as representatives of
the founders. (fn. 90)
There was an ancient schoolhouse in the churchyard. (fn. 91) The schoolmaster of Eccles formerly claimed
a small sum from each newly-married couple; if refused, the boys took the bride's garter. The custom
having become a nuisance, the churchwardens abolished
it, levying 4d. or 6d. at each marriage, to be paid to
the schoolmaster of Eccles. (fn. 92)
A place in the churchyard was known as Scots'
Hole, the tradition being that a number of rebels had
been buried there after execution. (fn. 93)
Near the church is a spring called the Lady's
well. (fn. 94)
CHARITIES
The ancient charities of Eccles
were but small. (fn. 95) There was in
1828 a Poor's stock of about £60;
and James Bradshaw of Croft's Bank had in 1800
left a rent-charge of £12 a year for education in that
hamlet, while a school had been founded at Roe
Green in Worsley as early as 1710. (fn. 96) The more
recent charitable endowments are chiefly educational
or ecclesiastical. (fn. 97)