CHAPTER XXIII.
LEICESTER SQUARE AND ITS NEIGHBOURHOOD.
"He made the desert smile."
Leicester Fields—Formation of the Square—Famous Duels fought here—Leicester House—Anecdote of George III.'s Childhood—Sir Ashton
Lever's Museum—Saville House—Miss Linwood's Exhibition of Needlework—Destruction of Saville House—Residence of Sir Joshua
Reynolds—Hogarth's House—The "Pic-nic Club"—John Hunter's Museum—The Alhambra—Burford's Panorama—The Church of Notre
Dame de France—Wyld's "Great Globe"—Downfall of the Statue of George I.—Renovation of the Square by Mr. Albert Grant—Residence
of Sir Isaac Newton—Cranbourn Street and Cranbourn Alley.
There are, perhaps, few places in the metropolis
remaining at the present day that combine the
characteristics of "Old and New London"—rolled
into one as it were—to a greater extent than
Leicester Square. It dates from the time of the
second Charles, to whose reign we are indebted for
many of those open spaces in the metropolis which
tend so necessarily towards its salubrity. Down
to the very last days of the Protectorate, Leicester
Fields—as the place was then, and even more
recently, termed—was entirely unbuilt upon. The
north side of the Leicester Square of to-day was
the only place occupied in the vicinity, and this
was taken up by Leicester House and its gardens,
at the back of which was a large open common
which was used for many years as a place for
military exercise.
The history of the square, in fact, begins with
Leicester House, which was built between 1632 and
1636, by Robert Sidney, Earl of Leicester, whose
voluminous correspondence, preserved among the
"Sidney Papers," is a history, in little, of his time,
and of whose sons, Philip and Algernon Sidney,
Leicester Fields hold many memories.
In Aggas' map there are no houses either north
or west of the mews enclosure. St. Martin's Lane
is represented with hedgerows, and the site of
Leicester Square is a drying-ground for clothes.
A woman is laying out sundry garments on the
grass, and in the next field are cattle, and a milkmaid carrying her pail. Stow, in his "Survey" of
1598, says of the mews—"And this is the farthest
building west on the north side of that High Street."
From Faithorne's map, compiled between 1643
and 1647, and published in 1658, we know that,
just before the Restoration, St. Martin's was literally
"in the fields," a windmill and a few scattered
houses stood where Windmill Street now is, and
Leicester House was still in grounds not surrounded
by buildings.
Of Aggas' map of London, so far as it concerns
this region, Mr. Tom Taylor remarks:—"There is
so much in the map which brings Shakespeare to
mind, that one is surprised not to find the Globe,
and the Red Bull, the Fortune, and the Curtain
playhouses as conspicuous as the 'Bull and Bear'
Gardens."
In this map all the country to the north of
Charing Cross and west of Chancery Lane is still
entirely devoted to country life and uses, and the
Hospital for Lepers, dedicated to St. Giles, stood
in the fields, with nothing between it and the spot
where now stands Leicester Square. The line of
St. Martin's Lane was, however, occupied by buildings on both sides as far as St. Giles's Church.
Soon after the Restoration increasing prosperity
led to a rapid increase of dwellings. The parish
of St. Martin had so enlarged its population that
"numerous inhabitants were deprived of an opportunity of publicly celebrating the divine offices,"
and the result of an application to Parliament was
that a separate parish was formed, and a new parish
church was built, dedicated to St. Anne, mother of
the Virgin. Around this (in what is now known
as Dean Street, Soho) buildings clustered, and
within fifty years the parish contained 1,337 houses,
according to Maitland. He adds the following information about the prosperity of the parish:—"There are of persons that keep coaches seventythree," and there "is a workhouse for the reception
of the poor;" and then he goes on:—"The fields
in these parts being lately converted into buildings,
I have not discovered anything of antiquity in this
parish;" many parts so greatly abound with French
that it is an "easy matter for a stranger to fancy
himself in France." This is a characteristic of the
parish that has not altered. Strype, in 1720, speaks
of the "chapels in these parts for the use of the
French nation, where our Liturgy turned into
French is used, French ministers that are refugees
episcopally ordained officiating; several whereof
are hereabouts seen walking in the canonical habit
of the English clergy. Abundance of French
people, many whereof are voluntary exiles for their
religion, live in these streets and lanes, following
honest trades, and some gentry of the same nation."
From John Overton's map, published in 1706,
it is easy to see how the buildings surrounding
Leicester Square lay at that time. The grass in
the centre is marked as enclosed. Cranbourn
Street and Bear Lane give access by the north-east
corner, and "Dirty Lane," or Green Street, by the
south-east. Panton Street, viâ "Slug Street," opens
the south-west corner, but the north-west side is
completely closed. Later maps show the communication via Sidney Alley, a narrow footway still
existing; but the route by which carriages from the
west now drive to Drury Lane or Covent Garden
was then blocked by a line of houses. Though we
cannot trace the building of the square with any
accuracy, we have a slight sketch of it by Strype in
1720, which could not have been more than some
forty or fifty years after its completion. He says
it is "a very handsome square, railed about and
gravelled within. The buildings are very good,
and well inhabited, and frequented by the gentry.
The north and west rows of buildings, which are in
St. Anne's parish, are the best; and especially on
the north, where is Leicester House, the seat of the
Earl of Leicester, being a large building with a fair
court before it for the reception of coaches, and a
fine garden behind it; the south and east sides
being in the parish of St. Martin's."
Rocque's map of 1737 shows how rapidly buildings spread north and west. Leicester House was
no longer in the country, as up to Oxford Street the
ground was filled with houses. The Country Journal
of Craftsmen, under the date of April 16, 1737,
contains the following statement:—"Leicester field
is going to be fitted up in a very elegant manner:
a new wall and rails to be erected all round, and a
basin in the middle, after the manner of Lincoln's
Inn Fields." Northouck, in 1773, writes:—"This
is a handsome square, the inner part of which is
enclosed by iron rails, and adorned with grass plats
and gravel walks. In the centre is an equestrian
statue of his present Majesty, gilt." This statue
was really of George I., modelled by C. Buchard
for the Duke of Chandos, and brought from Canons
in 1747, when it was purchased by the inhabitants
of the square. It was finely gilt, and in 1812 was
re-gilt. Of its later history we shall have more to
say presently.
Between the Restoration and the Revolution,
Leicester Field, as it was then called, had become
surrounded by houses and streets, and had assumed
nearly its present dimensions. Before the end of
the seventeenth century the centre, as shown
above, had been railed round, and was as famous
for duels as the ground behind Montague House
in later times. Here it was that the famous duel
occurred, in 1699, between Captains French and
Coote, in which Coote was slain on the spot at
night, and French and Lord Warwick wounded.
In it, too, was implicated Lord Mohun, of duelling
notoriety, but who, by all accounts, on this occasion did his best to arrange the difference between
the two hot-headed Irishmen. Thackeray has described in "Esmond" how Lord Mohun and Lord
Castlewood, with their respective friends, went to
the Duke's playhouse and saw Mrs. Bracegirdle
in Love in a Wood, then to the "Greyhound"
in Charing Cross to sup, where the two lords
quarrelled, according to previous arrangement, and
it was agreed to take chairs and go to Leicester
Field. Colonel Westbury, second to Lord Castlewood, asked, with a low bow to my Lord of
Warwick and Holland, second to Lord Mohun,
whether he should have the honour of exchanging
a pass or two with his lordship. "It is an honour
to me," said my Lord of Warwick and Holland,
"to be matched with a gentleman who has been
at Mons and Namur." Captain Macartney, the
second second, if we may so say, of Lord Mohun,
asked permission to give a lesson to Harry Esmond,
who was then fresh from Cambridge, and destined
for holy orders. Chairs were called, and the word
was given for Leicester Field, where the gentlemen
were set down opposite the "Standard" Tavern.
It was moonlight, and the town was abed, and
only a few lights shone in the windows of the
houses, but the night was bright enough for the
purpose of the disputants. All six entered the
square, the chairmen standing without the railing
and keeping the gate, lest any persons should
disturb the meeting. After Harry had been engaged for some two minutes, a cry from the chairmen, who were smoking their pipes, and leaning
over the railing as they watched the dim combat
within, announced that some catastrophe had
occurred. Lord Castlewood had received a mortal
wound, and he was carried to the house of Mr.
Aimes, surgeon, in Long Acre, where he died.
Besides Leicester House, there were now other
great houses in the square. To the west of it
stood a mansion belonging to Lord Ailesbury, inhabited in the year 1698 by Lord Carmarthen, the
eccentric son of the Duke of Leeds, an enthusiastic
amateur sailor and shipbuilder, as well as drinker
and rough customer, to whom William III. confided
the care of the Czar Peter. In Lord Carmarthen
the latter found a congenial spirit, and his great
delight while in England was to sail all day with him
in his yacht, the Peregrine, and drink brandy spiced
with pepper with him all night in Norfolk Street,
or Leicester Field. Before going to the theatre, it
is recorded that the Czar, besides a pint of brandy
and a bottle of sherry, "floored eight bottles of
sack after dinner." To the Czar, in January,
1712, succeeded, as a great foreign visitor, Prince
Eugene, "a little, ugly, yellow wizened man, with
one shoulder higher than the other." He was the
hero of the populace, for the English people were
eager to carry on the war, and the Prince was
against the impending peace which the new Tory
Government were just about to patch up. On the
14th of March the Prince left London, having
entirely failed in his warlike mission; and the same
month brought the Mohocks, "a race of rogues,"
Swift writes to Stella, "that play the devil about
the town every night and slit people's noses—young Davenant telling us at Court how he was
set upon by them, and how they ran his chair
through with a sword. It is not safe being in the
streets at night for them. The Bishop of Salisbury's (Burnet's) son is said to be of the gang.
They are all Whigs." Thus writes the great Tory
champion of the Whig bishop's son. He, too, had
his abode in Leicester Field in 1712, the year of
his greatest literary activity.

STATUE OF GEORGE I. AND HOGARTH'S HOUSE, 1790.
As we have already mentioned, Leicester House
was the first element of the "square," and as buildings gradually grew up around, it formed the boundary on the north side. The house itself stood well
back, having a spacious courtyard in front as well
as an extensive garden in the rear. Northouck
describes the house in 1773 as "a large brick
building, with a wide courtyard before." There is
extant a drawing of Leicester House by George
Virtue, taken in 1748, showing the sentries at the
gates of Saville and Leicester Houses. Leicester
House was of brick, two storeys, and an attic, and
with a range of nine windows in front. In 1788
the house was taken down, and maps of 1799,
such as Horwood's and Edward Waters', show the
building along the north side completed as now.
The enclosure had two rows of trees round it, and
was laid out with cross walks; various maps exhibit different arrangements of trees and walks.

LEICESTER SQUARE, ABOUT 1750.
Leicester House was the abode of the Sidneys—that noble family of which, in the sixteenth century,
Sir Henry Sidney, "the wisest, greatest, and justest
Lord-Deputy Ireland ever had," and his more
famous son Philip, were the great ornaments. In
the year 1632, Sir Henry's son, Robert, then Earl
of Leicester, built Leicester House, having derived
the ownership of the Lammas-land of St. Giles's
through the grant of Henry VIII. to his ancestor,
Lord Lisle. This Lammas-land was the tract of
ground lying between Charing Cross and Oxford
Road, or St. Giles's Road, and over it the citizens
of Westminster had right of common, though the
fee-simple was in St. Giles's, St. James's, and other
hospitals. Before another century had elapsed
those common rights had passed away, before
that determined progress from east to west, which
building in London has made in generation after
generation.
At Leicester House the Sidneys dwelt all through
the troublous times of the Commonwealth to the
end of the century, their leading spirit being the
unhappy Algernon Sidney, the pure patriot and
impracticable politician who was persecuted both
by Cromwell and Charles II. until he died on the
scaffold after the iniquitous trial for the Rye House
Plot, in 1683. It was not till near the close of
the eighteenth century that the Sidney property
of Leicester Fields passed to the Tulk family for
£90,000, which went to pay off the incumbrances
on Penshurst; and from the representatives of the
Tulks their rights over the enclosure now called the
square, were in the year 1874 acquired by Mr.
Albert Grant for £13,000, and made over to the
Metropolitan Board of Works.
Leicester House was for a short time the residence of the Princess Elizabeth, only daughter or
James I., the titular Queen of Bohemia, to whom
Lord Craven devoted his life and labours, and who,
in 1662, here ended her unfortunate life. Besides
the Queen of Bohemia—the "Queen of Hearts," as
she was called by all who came under the magic of
her influence—Leicester House was inhabited in
the last century by other royal and noble personages. In 1668 we find lodging in Leicester House
the French ambassador, Charles Colbert, Marquis
de Croisay. Pepys tells us in his "Diary," under
date October 21st, 1668, that he paid a visit to the
French ambassador, Colbert, at Leicester House.
Evelyn records a dinner he had at Leicester House
with the grave and gay Anne, Countess of Sunderland, when she sent for Richardson, the famous
fire-eater, to exhibit his prowess before them. In
1708, the house was let to the Imperial ambassador,
who, in 1712, there received Prince Eugene as his
guest, when "on a secret mission to prevent peace
from being arranged between Great Britain and
France," as we have already noticed.
At Leicester House, in the year 1721, was born
William, Duke of Cumberland, the hero of Culloden.
There, between 1717 and 1760, lived the Princes
of Wales, when a Prince of Wales was always at
deadly feud with the head of his house. George II.,
whilst Prince of Wales, there fed his grudge against
his father, which Mr. Taylor, in his "History of
Leicester Square," tells us had its deepest root in
the sympathy with his hapless mother, Sophia
Dorothea, doomed to life-long imprisonment at
Zell, on a charge of an intrigue with Count Philip
Königsmark, the younger brother of the man who
contrived the assassination of Thomas Thynne, of
Longleat, of which we shall have more to say
hereafter. In his day life in Leicester House was
as dull as ditch-water, and not much purer; and
when he succeeded to the throne in 1727, Frederick
Prince of Wales (though he lived for a short time
in Norfolk House, in St. James's Square, where
George III. was born in 1738) became the
tenant of Leicester House the year after Sir Robert
Walpole's downfall in 1742, and that mansion
became again, as Pennant happily called it, "the
pouting place of princes" till the somewhat sudden
death of Frederick, in 1751. The king never
visited his son during his illness, and received
the news when playing cards with the Countess
Walmoden with the cool expression, "Fritz ist todt."
An amusing story relating to the childhood of
George III. is told in connection with Leicester
House. A foreigner, named Goupée, an artist of
some note in his day, and a favourite with Frederick
Prince of Wales, was a frequent visitor there. One
day the prince said to him, "Come, sit down,
Goupée, and paint me a picture on such a subject.
But Goupée perceiving Prince George (afterwards
King George III.) a prisoner behind a chair, took
the liberty humbly to represent to his royal patron,
how impossible it was for him to sit down to
execute his royal highness's commands with spirit,
while the prince was standing, and under his royal
displeasure. "Come out, George, then," said the
good-natured prince, "Goupée has released you."
When Goupée was eighty-four years of age, and
very poor, he had to nurse and maintain a mad
woman, who was the object of his delight when
young; he therefore often put himself in the
king's sight at Kensington, where he lived. At
length the king stopped his coach, and called to
him. "How do you do, Goupée?" said the king,
and after a few other questions asked him if he
had enough to live upon. "Little enough, indeed,"
replied Goupée; "and as I once took your majesty
out of prison, I hope you will not let me go to
one." His majesty ordered him a pension of a
guinea a week, but he did not live to enjoy it more
than a few months.
Here, as we are reminded by Peter Cunningham,
the Princess of Wales was waited upon by the wife
of the unfortunate Earl of Cromartie, who was so
deeply involved in the fatal Scottish rising of 1745.
She came leading in her hand her four little
children, the sight of whom ought to have roused
a feeling of sympathy in a maternal heart. "The
princess saw her," says Gray, in one of his letters,
"but made her no other answer than by bringing
in her own children and by placing them by her."
On the 26th of October, 1760, George III. was
proclaimed king before Saville House, in Leicester
Square; and on the 29th it was crowded with the
mob, assembled to see the courtiers thronging to
Leicester House to kiss the hand of the new king.
The Dowager Princess of Wales continued to live
in Leicester House till 1766, when she removed to
Carlton House; and about the same time occurred
the last incident connected with royalty in Leicester
Fields—the death, at Saville House, of Prince
Frederick William, the youngest brother of the
king, aged sixteen. While tenanted by the Royal
family, the evenings at Leicester House were often
enlivened by private theatricals, in which it is
recorded that the future king of England and his
brothers acted their childish parts with ability and
spirit.
Leicester House subsequently became occupied
by private persons, and was at one time used by
Sir Ashton Lever as a Museum of Natural History.
In 1784 Sir Ashton presented a petition to the
House of Commons, praying to be allowed to
dispose of his museum by a lottery, as Alderman
Boydell had done with his gallery. On this occasion it was stated by his manager that it had been
brought to London in the year 1775; that it had
occupied twelve years in forming, and contained
upwards of 26,000 articles; that the money taken
for admission amounted, from February, 1775, to
February, 1784, to about £13,000, out of which
£660 had been paid for house-rent and taxes.
Sir Ashton proposed that his whole museum should
go together, and that there should be 40,000
tickets at one guinea each, but of this number only
8,000 tickets were sold. However, the proprietor
allowed the lottery to take place, and although he
held 28,000 tickets, he lost his museum, which was
won by a Mr. Parkinson, who only held two. The
house was finally pulled down in 1806, and the
site is now bounded on the west by Leicester
Place, a wide thoroughfare leading to Lisle Street.
New Lisle Street was built in 1791 on the site of
the gardens of Leicester House.
Adjoining Leicester House, on the west, stood,
until very recently, a large mansion, called Saville
House, formerly the residence of the patriotic Sir
George Saville, who was many years Knight of the
Shire for the County of York, ancestor of the Earls
and Marquises of Halifax, and who introduced the
Catholic Relief Bill, which led to the Gordon riots
in 1780. Saville House, it is well known, occupied
nearly the centre of the northern side of the square.
It has been, however, as Mr. Timbs remarks in
his "Romance of London," frequently confounded
with Leicester House, which it adjoined. The
latter house, however, stood at the north-eastern
extremity, and to this mansion was added Saville
House, a communication being made between the
two houses for the children of Frederick, Prince of
Wales. Saville House was likewise called Ailesbury House, and here Thomas, third Earl of
Ailesbury, entertained Peter the Great, when he
visited England in the year 1698; and here, too, in
all probability, the Czar enjoyed his pet tipple with
his boon companion, the Marquis of Carmarthen,
as we have already stated. The house passed into
the Saville family through the marriage of Lord
Ailesbury's son and successor, Charles, third and
last Earl of Ailesbury of that creation, who married
Lady Ann Saville, eldest daughter and co-heir of
Sir William Saville, second Marquis of Halifax.
At any rate, Sir George Saville, Bart., M.P., who
owned the house in 1780, was the male heir of
the Savilles and of the Marquis of Halifax, and the
inheritor of the baronetcy. The house, in the
Gordon riots, was stripped of its valuable furniture,
books, and pictures, which the rioters burnt in the
square; and the iron rails were torn from the front
of the house and used by the mob as weapons.
Saville House was rebuilt early in the present
century, and soon became a sort of "Noah's Ark,"
for exhibition purposes. Here Miss Linwood exhibited her needlework, from the year 1800 until
her death in 1845; and here, too, the National
Political Union held its reform meetings, recalling
the storms of the previous century. Then came a
succession of prodigies of nature and art. Amongst
the latter were a large moving panorama of the
Mississippi River, and a series of views of New
Zealand; concerts and balls, and exhibitions of too
questionable a shape for us to detail. "Through
some sixty years of the showman's art, flaring by
night and by day, Saville House lasted unharmed
until the catastrophe of 1865, when the royal babyhouse and the cheap pleasure-haunt were burnt in
the short space of two hours."
Part of the house, on being refitted after the
Gordon riots, was occupied by a carpet manufacturer, and subsequently by Messrs. Stagg and
Mantle, drapers and silk mercers; and also by
Messrs. Bickers and Bush, extensive booksellers.
The eastern wing of it was for many years the
show-room of Miss Linwood's exhibition of needlework, as mentioned above, which enjoyed a popularity second only to that of Madame Tussaud's
exhibition of wax-work in Baker Street. This
exhibition gave a new name to Saville House, it
being known for nearly half a century as the Linwood Gallery. It comprised about sixty copies of
the best and finest pictures of the English and
foreign schools of art, all executed by the most
delicate handicraft with the needle, the tapestry
"possessing all the correct drawing, just colouring,
and light and shade of the original pictures from
which they are copied." The entrance to this
exhibition was up a flight of stone steps, leading to
a large room.
After enjoying half a century of popularity, the
exhibition came to an end in 1844, and the pictures
were sold by auction, realising only a comparative
trifle. No less than 3,000 guineas had been refused
for the chief work, viz., "Salvator Mundi," after
Carlo Dolci, and Miss Linwood bequeathed it to
the Queen; but so reduced was the value of these
works at her death, that when Messrs. Christie
and Manson sold the collection by auction, all the
pictures, except a few which were reserved, did not
realise more than £1,000. The rooms which they
occupied were then turned into a concert and ballroom, and made use of for entertainments of a
very questionable character; but they were burnt
down in February, 1865, the Prince of Wales being
among the spectators of the destruction of the
house once inhabited by his ancestors. The house
has never since been rebuilt. The outer walls
remained standing, displaying a placard-board
styling the dreary place as the Denmark Theatre,
and thus hinting that it belongs to some company,
limited or otherwise, which never passed beyond
the embryo state.
Underneath Saville House are some extensive
apartments, to which we gain descent by a flight of
a few steps from the street. The chief room, often
called the "theatre," has been used for various
exhibitions from time to time, including "Miller's
Mechanical and Picturesque Representations,"
consisting of seven views of cities, "the figures of
which," says a prospectus in 1814, "are impressed
with movements peculiar to each, so as to imitate
the operations of nature." The passage leading
to this theatre, Mr. Britton tells us, in 1815, "has
been lately opened as one of those singular establishments called bazaars." The "theatre" was
changed into an extensive billiard-room, fitted with
foreign as well as English tables; and the entrance
was fitted up as a refreshment bar.
A large house, No. 47, on the western side
of the square, was for many years the residence
of Sir Joshua Reynolds. Here duchesses and
marchionesses, ladies and fair daughters of the
aristocracy sat to the monarch of the world of art,
to be immortalised by his brush. Here Burke and
Foote, Goldsmith and Dr. Johnson, Garrick and
Boswell, and most of the celebrated men of the last
century, were in the habit of assembling, and of
dining almost every week at the hospitable board of
the great portrait painter. His house here, we are
told, was magnificently proportioned; it possessed
one of the finest staircases in London; it was fitted
up with exquisite taste, and it was the rendezvous
of the literary world. Here Sir Joshua worked
with the greatest assiduity until the last, and only
ended his laborious toil, which was, however, to
him a labour of love, with his life.
Of Sir Joshua Reynolds (who died here in 1792)
it would be presumptuous to say a word of praise,
beyond quoting the words of Edmund Burke:—"Sir Joshua Reynolds was, on very many accounts,
one of the most memorable men of his time. He
was the first Englishman who added the praise of
his elegant arts to the other glories of his country.
In taste, in grace, in facility, in happy invention,
and in the richness and harmony of colouring, he
was equal to the great masters of the renowned
ages. In portrait-painting he was beyond them, for
he communicated to that description of the art in
which English artists are the most engaged a variety,
a fancy, and a dignity derived from the higher
branches which even those who professed them in
a superior manner did not always preserve, when
they delineated individual nature. In painting
portraits, he appeared not to be raised upon that
platform, but to descend to it from a higher sphere.
His paintings illustrate his lessons, and his lessons
seem to be derived from his paintings. He possessed the theory as perfectly as the practice of his
art. To be such a painter, he was a profound and
penetrating philosopher. In full affluence of foreign
and domestic fame, admired by the expert in art,
and by the learned in science, courted by the great,
caressed by sovereign powers, and celebrated by
distinguished poets, his native humility, modesty,
and candour never forsook him, even on surprise
or provocation; nor was the least degree of arrogance or assumption visible to the most scrutinising
eye in any part of his conduct or discourse. His
talents of every kind, powerful from nature, and
not meanly cultivated by letters, his social virtues
in all the relations and all the habitudes of life,
rendered him the centre of a very great and unparalleled variety of agreeable societies, which will
be dissipated by his death. He had too much
merit not to excite some jealousy, too much innocence to provoke any enmity. The loss of no man
of his time can be felt with more sincere, general,
and unmixed sorrow."
Sir Joshua Reynolds' handsome house was next
held by the Earl of Inchiquin; then by a society
as the Western Literary and Scientific Institution;
and it was subsequently taken by Messrs. Puttick
and Simpson, the eminent auctioneers, who removed hither from Piccadilly. The actual apartment used as their auction-room was Sir Joshua's
studio.
Allan Cunningham, in his "Lives of Painters,"
gives us the following peep into Sir Joshua Reynolds' painting-room a century ago, and an insight
into his regular habits:—
"His study was octagonal, some twenty feet long
by sixteen broad, and about fifteen feet high. The
window was small and square, and the sill nine feet
from the floor. His sitters' chair moved on castors,
and stood above the floor about a foot and a half.
He held his palettes by the handle, and the sticks
of his brushes were eighteen inches long. He
wrought standing, and with great celerity; he rose
early, breakfasted at nine, entered his study at ten,
examined designs or touched unfinished portraits
till eleven brought a sitter, painted till four, then
dressed, and gave the evening to company."
The first London residence of Sir Thomas
Lawrence, the pupil and successor of Sir Joshua
Reynolds as the fashionable portrait painter of the
day, was over a confectioner's shop, at No. 4 in
the square, a house which was subsequently incorporated in Saville House when the latter building
was enlarged.
Bell (afterwards the far-famed Sir Charles Bell)
lived in Leicester Square, in the house where
Mr. Speaker Onslow had resided. He, in turn,
was succeeded by Cruikshank, Sir Joshua Reynolds'
medical attendant, the same who succeeded to
Hunter's Medical School.
At the south-eastern corner of the square stood
the house in which the inimitable George Hogarth
lived and worked for many years. It was in 1733
that Hogarth settled here with his young wife,
whom he had carried off from the house of her
father, Sir James Thornhill, three years before.
The house bore the sign of the "Golden Head,"
and in it most of Hogarth's finest works were
engraved and sold; and there, after his death, his
widow lived till 1789. In April, 1790, "the pictures and prints of the late Mrs. Hogarth" were
sold by auction by Mr. Greenwood, at the "Golden
Head," Leicester Square. Though the catalogue
contained numerous pictures by Hogarth's own
hand, by Sir James Thornhill, and a variety of
portraits of the artist, his wife, sister, and other
relatives, the entire sale realised only £255. It
must raise a smile to read that on this occasion a
"parcel of Academy figures and studies by Mr.
Hogarth" fetched only eleven shillings and sixpence! After this sale the connection of the
Hogarths with Leicester Square ceased.
With reference to the sign of the "Golden
Head," Nichols, in his second edition of "Biographical Anecdotes of William Hogarth," says,
"Hogarth made one essay in sculpture. He
wanted a sign to distinguish his house in Leicester
Fields, and thinking none more proper than the
"Golden Head," he, out of a mass of cork made
up of several thicknesses compacted together, carved
a bust of Vandyck, which he gilt and placed over
his door. It is long since decayed, and was
succeeded by a head in plaster, which has also
perished; and is supplied by a head of Sir Isaac
Newton" (since taken down). "Hogarth also
modelled another resemblance of Vandyck in clay,
which is likewise destroyed." Hogarth's house,
or, at all events, part of it, was afterwards converted into the "Sablonnière Hotel," which was
kept by an Italian named Pagliano, and largely
frequented by foreigners. The building was pulled
down in 1870, and on its site was erected the new
school-house and library of Archbishop Tenison,
which were removed thither from their old quarters
at the back of the National Gallery, to which we
have referred in the preceding chapter.
At some public rooms in this square, kept by a
foreigner, M. de Texier, as Lord William Lennox
tells us, the first "Pic-nic Club" was organised in
London, by the aid of Lady Albinia Cumberland,
and Colonel (afterwards Sir Charles) Greville.
Individuals of either sex belonged to it, and took
their chances in a strange lottery, being bound to
supply whatever dish, or other eatable or drinkable,
they might draw. To this concerts and amateur
dramatic entertainments were added; but the club
did not prosper, being probably "in advance of
the time," and much opposed by parents of the
old-fashioned, straight-laced school. It was also
attacked by the caricaturists, who, by driving the
ladies away, succeeded in staying it outright. There
was a rival Pic-nic Society at the Pantheon in
Oxford Street, but it shared a like fate.
Almost in the centre of the eastern side, nearly
on the site of the Alhambra, stood the Anatomical
Museum of John Hunter, the celebrated surgeon,
where was formed the nucleus of the Hunterian
Museum, now at the College of Surgeons, Lincoln's
Inn Fields. It was in the year 1783 that John
Hunter became owner of No. 28, on the east side
of the square, and at the back of it, on ground
leading to Castle Street, he built his famous
Museum of Comparative Anatomy. In 1785 the
erection was complete, and one of the first acquisitions of its owner was the skeleton of O'Brien, the
Irish giant, which may still be seen, as we have
already said, in the College of Surgeons. Foote
tells us that Hunter held, on Sunday evenings,
during the winter months, regular receptions of his
friends or public medical levees, for which he sent
out cards of invitation; he "regaled them with tea
and coffee," and "treated them with medical occurrences." Having raised the science of surgery to
a height never believed to be possible, and thus
benefited the whole human race, Hunter died of
disease of the heart, aggravated by an angry discussion in the Board-room of St. George's Hospital,
in the sixty-fourth year of his age, "without an
equal in the world in his combined character of
surgeon and naturalist." He was buried in St.
Martin's Church, and his widow would gladly have
raised a monument to his memory in Westminster
Abbey, but he died poor, and she could not pay
the Dean and Chapter their fees. Thus he
remained without a statue till Mr. Albert Grant
selected him as a fit subject for one of the busts in
the new enclosure in Leicester Square.

THE SITE OF LEICESTER SQUARE. (From Aggas' Map.)
The building now known as the Royal Alhambra
Palace Theatre is a place of amusement where
music and dancing form the chief features of attraction. It was built in the Moorish or Arabesque
style, and opened about the year 1852–3 as a place
of popular instruction, somewhat after the plan of
the Polytechnic, and bore at first the name of the
"Royal Panopticon of Science and Art." It was
got up under the auspices of several philanthropic
individuals as a joint-stock undertaking. But the
speculation did not answer, and after a few years
the company broke up. The building was closed for
a time, and then re-opened under the name by
which it is at present known. It is at once a
theatre and a music-hall. It consists of a spacious
auditorium, with three tiers of galleries, and a
stage particularly adapted for the representation of
burlesque and other pieces requiring scenic effect,
Architecturally, it is one of the most elegant places
of entertainment of the kind in London. The
facade of the building is flat, with lofty minarets
at the corners; and the dome in the centre, together
with the coloured decoration, make it a striking
object. The chief feature of the interior is the
rotunda, formed by tiers of galleries, and horseshoeshaped arches supporting the several galleries. The
great organ, built for the Panopticon, was purchased
for St. Paul's Cathedral, but has since been removed
to Clifton.

THE PANOPTICON, IN 1854.
In a humble and modest lodging in Orange
Court, Leicester Fields, the artist, Opie, was living,
when discovered by Wyatt.
In this square, towards the close of the last
century, Charles Dibdin built and opened a theatre
of his own under the name of Sans Souci. Mr.
J. T. Smith tells us, in his "Book for a Rainy
Day," that "for many years the back parlour of the
'Feathers' public-house—which stood on the side
of Leicester Fields, and which was so called in
compliment to its neighbour Frederick, Prince of
Wales, who inhabited Leicester House—had been
frequented by artists, and several well-known
amateurs. Among the former were Stuart, the
Athenian traveller; Scott, the marine painter; old
Oram, of the Board of Works; Luke Sullivan, the
miniature-painter, who engraved Hogarth's picture
of 'The March to Finchley,' now in the Foundling
Hospital; Captain Grose, the author of 'Antiquities
of England,' 'History of Armour,' &c.; Mr. Hearne,
the draughtsman of many of England's antiquities,
Nathaniel Smith, my father, &c. The amateurs
were Henderson, the actor; Mr. Morris, a silversmith; Mr. John Ireland, then a watchmaker in
Maiden Lane, and since editor of Boydell's edition
of Dr. Trusler's work, 'Hogarth Moralised;' and
Mr. Baker, of St. Paul's Churchyard, whose collection of Bartolozzi's works was unequalled. When
this house, the sign of the 'Feathers,' was taken
down, to make way for Dibdin's theatre, several
of its frequenters adjourned to the 'Coach and
Horses' in Castle Street, Leicester Fields; but
in consequence of their not proving customers
sufficiently expensive for that establishment, the
landlord one evening venturing to light them out
with a farthing candle, they betook themselves to
Gerard Street, and thence to the 'Blue Posts,' in
Dean Street, where the association dwindled to
three members, and died a natural death."
The building known as the "Panorama" stood
in the north-east corner of the square, and was an
exhibition of ancient reputation. Here Burford's
celebrated panoramas were exhibited for several
years. Part of the building was subsequently used
as a "penny news-room," and as a sort of Red Republicans' Club; but it was finally converted into
a Roman Catholic church, dedicated to "Notre
Dame de France," under the ministration of the
Marist Fathers. The mission was established here
in conjunction with Les Sœurs de Charité Françaises,
or the establishment of the Sisters of Charity in
Leicester Place. Some idea of the benefits resulting from this combined force may be gathered
from the address of Archbishop Manning at the
consecration of the mission in April, 1874. After
alluding to the manner in which the structure had
been raised and embellished, and to the resources
for the mission, he said, "With such a church on
one side of Leicester Place, and the many establishments of the Sisters of Charity on the other, not
only the street itself, but the entire foreign colony
around it, enjoys advantages which any other
portion of London might envy. We have said
'establishments,' for though there are only eight
Sisters of Charity at Leicester Place, they carry on
a hospital, a dispensary, a girls' school, an infants'
school, a crêche, a patronage for young girls, a system
of out-door relief, and, with the assistance of a
master, a boys' school. Since the foundation of the
hospital and the dispensary in 1867, relief has been
given to 1,400 in-patients, and 19,000 out-patients;
while in relief to the poor souls, 20,000 pounds
weight of bread are distributed each year by those
'ministering angels' in human form. In this crêche
they have an average of twenty-five babies of poor
mothers who have to go out and work for their daily
bread; in their infant school eighty lisping little ones;
in their girls' school seventy pupils; and in their
boys' school thirty-six. The patronage numbers from
fifty to sixty young girls on its books. If we reflect
for a moment on the heterogeneous elements of
which the French population of Soho is composed,
the work undertaken by the Marist Fathers and the
Sisters of Charity will at once appear to be what it
really is, simply appalling."
We have already referred to the central enclosure
of Leicester Square in the early stages of its
existence, and it now remains to add that shortly
after the commencement of the nineteenth century,
its glory began to fade. The square gradually
became deserted by the gentry who had previously
resided within its limits, and its houses having
become untenanted, the enclosed garden fell into
equal neglect. In 1851 the area was occupied
by a large, circular, domed building, in which was
exhibited Wyld's "Great Globe." This representation of the world we live in was sixty-five feet in
diameter, and comprised a surface of some ten
thousand square feet. Galleries encircled the
interior of the building at different heights from the
ground, by which means visitors were enabled to
walk round and inspect every portion of the globe,
an attendant, staff in hand, pointing out its principal features; lectures were likewise delivered at
intervals during the day. In addition to the
"Great Globe," Mr. Wyld introduced, in 1854, a
well-executed model of the Crimea, and as this had
the positions of the different armies of the Allies
and of the Russians correctly laid down from day
to day, according as news arrived in England from
the seat of war, it was soon the chief object of
interest to the thousands who flocked to Leicester
Square every day. In 1859 a curious Oriental
Museum was exhibited here, illustrative of life in
Turkey, Armenia, and Albania, with life-like models
of the interiors of palaces, harems, bazaars, offices
of State, and courts of justice, with priests, soldiers,
and janissaries, &c., much after the fashion of
Madame Tussaud's.
On the removal of Wyld's "Great Globe," after
occupying the square for about ten years, the enclosure became exposed once more in all its hideous
nakedness. From that time down to the middle of
the year 1874, its condition was simply a disgrace
to the metropolis. Overgrown with rank and fetid
vegetation, it was a public nuisance, both in an
æsthetic and in a sanitary point of view; covered
with the débris of tin pots and kettles, cast-off shoes,
old clothes, and dead cats and dogs, it was an
eye-sore to every one forced to pass by it. As for
the "golden horse and its rider," the effigy of
George I., which had been set up in the centre
of the enclosure when Leicester House was the
"pouting place of princes," besides having suffered
all the inclemencies of the weather for years, it had
become the subject of every species of practical
joke by almost every gamin in London. The
horse is said to have been modelled after that of
Le Sœur at Charing Cross; whilst the statue of
George I. was considered a great work of art in its
day, and was one of the sights of London, until
after a quarter of a century of humiliations, after
being the standing butt of ribald caricaturists, and
the easy mark of witlings, it gradually fell to pieces.
The effigy of his Majesty was the first to be assailed.
His arms were first cut off; then his legs followed
suit, and afterwards his head; when the iconoclasts, who had doomed him to destruction, at
last dismounted him, propping up the mutilated
torso against the remains of the once caracolling
charger on which the statue had been mounted,
and which was in nearly quite as dilapidated a
plight. It would be almost impossible to tell all
the pranks that were played upon this ill-starred
monument, and how Punch and his comic contemporaries made fun of it, whilst the more serious
organs waxed indignant as they dilated on the
unmerited insults to which it was subjected. One
night a party of jovial spirits actually whitewashed
it all over, and daubed it ignominiously with large
black spots.
The disgraceful state of Leicester Square became
such that it attracted the attention of Parliament,
and innumerable were the discussions that took
place upon it, with, however, little amelioration in
its actual condition. In the year 1869 it was
reported that the enterprising proprietors were
about to sell the land for building purposes, but
upon a communication being sent to the Board of
Works, informing them of the fact, it was resolved
that the Board would "do all in its power" to
prevent the open space from being swallowed up
by bricks and mortar. The owners of the fee-simple
in the land had all along, in a sort of dog-in-themanger spirit, not only refused to reclaim the square
themselves, but had resisted every effort, or refused
every offer of other more beneficent persons, who
were willing and eager to undertake a work which it
should have been their first duty to accomplish.
At length, after an immense amount of litigation, it
was finally settled by a decision of the Master of
the Rolls, in December, 1873, "that the vacant
space in Leicester Square is not to be built over,
but will be retained as open ground, for the purposes
of ornament and recreation." A "defence committee" was established, and owing to their initiative
Mr. Albert Grant was led to make an offer of
purchasing the square. Early in 1874 that gentleman set measures on foot which finally resulted in
his obtaining possession of the square, on the
payment of a large sum for purchase-money to the
proprietors. He had determined to present it, as
a people's garden, to the citizens of the metropolis;
and the purchase having been effected, steps were
immediately taken to carry out the intentions of the
donor. In laying out the ground, nothing pretentious was attempted. The central space was
converted into an ornamental garden, and adorned
with statuary, &c. The principal ornament of the
new square is a white marble fountain, surmounted
by a statue of Shakespeare, also in white marble,
the figure being an exact reproduction by Signor
Fontana of the statue designed by Kent, and
executed by Shumacher, on the Westminster Abbey
cenotaph. The water spouts from jets round the
pedestal, and from the beaks of dolphins at each of
its corners, into a marble basin. Flower-beds surround this central mass, and the enclosure—so long
a squalid and unsightly waste—is now a gay and
pleasant garden of flowering shrubs, green plots,
inlaid with bright flower-beds and broad gravelled
paths. In each angle of the garden is a bust of
white marble on a granite pedestal. To the southeast stands Hogarth, by Durham; to the southwest, Newton, by Weekes; to the north-east, John
Hunter, by Woolner; and to the north-west,
Reynolds, by Marshall.
The ceremony of transferring the ground to the
Metropolitan Board of Works for the enjoyment of
the public, took place on the 9th of July, 1874.
The sum expended by Mr. Albert Grant in purchasing the property and laying out the grounds,
&c., amounted to about £30,000.
Close by Leicester Fields in St. Martin's Street,
on the east side, lived, in the year 1710, after his
removal from Jermyn Street, Sir Isaac Newton,
Master of the Mint and President of the Royal
Society, then, perhaps, better known by those official
titles than by his imperishable astronomical works.
Though now dingy and dreary, St. Martin's Street
in 1710 was good enough for envoys and high
officials, and thither Newton drew all that was
scientific to his entertainments. At the same
time, most of the wits of the day flocked thither
to see the philosopher's charming niece, Catherine
Barton, who kept house for him for sixteen years,
from 1710 to 1727.
In this famous
house in St. Martin's Street afterwards lived Dr.
Martin Burney,
the author of the
"History of
Music" and other
works, the father
of a still more
famous daughter,
Fanny, authoress
of "Evelina," the
petted friend of
all the blues and
wits of her generation, and the
writer of a diary
second only to
Boswell's "Life of
Johnson" for its
vivid pictures of
the life and manners of the time of George III.
In this house Dr. Burney lived between 1770 and
1789, when he removed to Chelsea Hospital. The
study and library of Sir Isaac Newton, where so
many of the mysteries of Nature were solved, has
heard the sound of the billiard balls, and is now
part of Bertolini's Hotel, at the corner of Orange
Street.

AN INVITATION CARD BY HOGARTH.
It was here that the antiquary, Dr. Stukely,
called one day, by appointment. The servant who
opened the door said that Sir Isaac was in his
study. No one was permitted to disturb him
there; but, as it was near his dinner-time, the visitor
sat down to wait for him. In a short time a boiled
chicken under a cover was brought in for dinner.
An hour passed, and Sir Isaac did not appear.
The doctor then ate the fowl, and, covering up the
empty dish, desired the servant to get another
dressed for his master. Before that was ready, the
great man came down. He apologised for his
delay, and added, "Give me but leave to take my
short dinner, and I shall be at your service. I am
fatigued and faint." Saying this, he lifted up the
cover, and without emotion, turned about to Stukely
with a smile, "See," he said, "what we studious
people are! I forgot that I had dined."
In the last century, as now, the neighbourhood
of Leicester Fields was the favourite resort of
foreigners. Green Street, Bear Street, Castle Street,
and Panton Street, formed a district called, as was
a purlieu in Westminster too, near the Sanctuary,
"Petty France." The dwellers in Leicester Fields'
slums, and in the
adjoining district
of Soho, it would
seem, were mainly
Catholics, frequenting the Sardinian ambassadors' chapel in
Duke Street, Lincoln's Inn Fields.
The French hairdressers and perfumers lived mostly
under the Piazza
in Covent Garden,
in Bow Street, and
in Long Acre; and
very few contrived
to live east of
Temple Bar.
Cranbourn
Street, or, as it was
formerly called,
Cranbourn Alley, which runs out of Leicester
Square at the north-east angle, dates from about
1677, when it was simply a footway for passengers, and named after the family of Cecil, Earl
of Salisbury, whose second title was, and is, Viscount Cranbourne. The alley was formed into a
street by the pulling down of the whole of one
side in 1843–44, thus forming a continuous roadway
from Coventry Street, along the top of the Square,
into Long Acre. In this alley, Hogarth was apprenticed to a goldsmith named Gamble, in order
to learn the art of silver-plate engraving. Mr.
Peter Cunningham remarks that "a shop-bill engraved for Gamble by his eminent pupil is the
envy of every collector of Hogarth's works." At
one time Cranbourn Alley was a celebrated mart
for cheap articles in the way of straw bonnets and
millinery. To such an extent was this the case,
that a Cranbourn Alley article then bore the same
meaning which we now are in the habit of affixing
to "Brummagem" goods.
Cranbourn Alley, it would seem, was in 1725
a place where the street-songs, broadsides, &c., of
the day were hawked and cried. "I never pass
through Cranbourn Alley," writes the witty author
of the "London Spy," "but I am astonish'd at the
remissness and lenity of the magistrates in suffering
the Pretender's interest to be carry'd on and promoted in so publick and shameful a manner as it
there is. Here a fellow stands eternally bawling
out his Pye-Corner Pastorals, in behalf of 'Dear
Jemmy, lovely Jemmy,' &c. I have been credibly
inform'd that this man has actually in his pocket
a commission under the Pretender's great seal,
constituting him his Ballad Singer in Ordinary
in Great Britain." Of course this is badinage;
but no doubt the ballad-monger was one of the
institutions of the alley, though close to the gates
of Denmark House.
A famous shop in old Cranbourn Alley was the
silversmith's, Hamlet's—a long, low shop, whose
windows seemed to have no end, and not to have
been dusted for centuries, with dim vistas of dishcovers, coffee-biggins, and centre-pieces. Hamlet's
stock-in-trade is said to have been worth millions.
Seven watchmen kept guard over it every night,
and half the aristocracy were in his debt. Royalty
itself had gone credit for plate and jewellery at
Hamlet's. The proprietor of the establishment in
the end took to building, and came to grief. His
shop is now no more, and his name in the neighbourhood almost forgotten. "Very curious is it to
mark," says a well-known writer, "how old trades
and old types of inhabitants linger about localities.
They were obliged to pull old Cranbourne Street
and Cranbourn Alley quite down before they
could get rid of the silversmiths, and even now
they are seen sprouting forth again round about
the familiar haunt—one of the latest examples
being in the shop of a pawnbroker, the owner of
which suddenly astonished New Cranbourn Street
with plate-glass windows overflowing with plate,
jewellery, and trinkets, buhl cabinets, gilt consoles,
suits of armour, antique china, Pompadour clocks,
bronze monsters, and other articles of vertu."