CHAPTER V.
CHELSEA.
"The sands of Chelsey Fields."—Ben Jonson.
Boundary of the Parish—Etymology of its Name—Charles II. and Colonel Blood—Chelsea Fields—The "Dwarf's Tavern"—Chapels of
French Huguenot Refugees—Gardens and Nurseries—Appearance of Chelsea from the River—Chelsea in the Last Century—A Stag Hunt in
Chelsea—History of the Manor—The Old Manor House and its Eminent Residents—Lord Cremorne's Farm at Chelsea—Lady Cremorne—Lindsey House—The Moravians—The Duchess of Mazarine—Sir Robert Walpole's House—Shrewsbury House—Winchester House—Beaufort House and the "Good" Sir Thomas More—Anecdotes of Sir Thomas More—The Old and New Parish Churches.
Few, if any, of the suburban districts of the
metropolis can lay claim to greater interest, biographical as well as topographical, than the locality
upon which we have now entered. In Faulkner's
"History of Chelsea," we read that the parish
is "bounded on the north by the Fulham Road,
which separates it from Kensington; on the east
by a rivulet, which divides it from St. George's,
Hanover Square, and which enters the Thames
near Ranelagh; on the west a brook, which rises
near Wormholt Scrubs, and falls into the Thames
facing Battersea Church, divides this parish from
that of Fulham; and on the south it is bounded
by the Thames." Lysons observes that the most
ancient record in which he has seen the name
of this place mentioned is a charter of Edward
the Confessor, in which it is written "Cealchylle." (fn. 1)
The name seems to have puzzled the Norman
scribes, for in Domesday Book it is written both
"Cercehede" and "Chelched;" and in certain
documents of a later date it is called "Chelcheth,"
or "Chelcith." "The word 'Chelsey,'" observes
Mr. Norris Brewer, in the "Beauties of England
and Wales," "was first adopted in the sixteenth
century, and the present mode of spelling the
name appears to have grown into use about a
century back." It may here be remarked that
the name of Chelsea has been derived by some
writers from "Shelves" of sand, and "ey," or
"ea," land situated near the water. But Lysons
prefers the etymology of Norden, who says that
"it is so called from the nature of the place, its
strand being like the chesel [ceosel, or cesol], which
the sea casteth up of sand and pebble stones,
thereof called Chevelsey, briefly Chelsey." In
like manner it may be added that the beach of
pebbles thrown up by the action of the sea outside Weymouth harbour, is styled the Chesil bank.
Perhaps it is the same word at bottom as Selsey,
the name of a peninsula of pebbles on the Sussex
coast, near Chichester.
As a symbol of infinity, Ben Jonson, in his
"Forest," speaks of
"All the grass that Romney yields,
Or the sands of Chelsey Fields."
Macaulay reminds us that, at the end of the
reign of Charles II., Chelsea was a "quiet country
village, with about a thousand inhabitants; the
baptisms averaging little more than forty in the
year." At that time the Thames was sufficiently
clear and pure for bathing above Westminster.
We are told that, on one occasion, Charles II.
was bathing at Chelsea, when the notorious Colonel
Blood lay hid among the reeds at Battersea, in
order to shoot him. Notwithstanding its remoteness from the metropolis, however, Chelsea does
not appear to have escaped the ravages of the
"Great Plague," for it raged here as well as in
other suburbs of London, as Pepys informs us, in
his "Diary," under date of April 9th, 1666:—"Thinking to have been merry at Chelsey; but,
being almost come to the house by coach, near
the waterside, a house alone, I think the 'Swan,'
a gentleman walking by called out to us that the
house was shut up because of the sickness."
Chelsea Fields must have been quite a rustic
spot even to a yet later date, for Gay thus addresses his friend Pulteney:—
"When the sweet-breathing spring unfolds the buds,
Love flies the dusty town for shady woods;
Then … … …
… Chelsea's meads o'erhear perfidious vows,
And the press'd grass defrauds the grazing cows."
In "Chelsea Fields" was formerly a tavern,
known as "The Dwarf's," kept by John Coan, a
diminutive manikin from Norfolk. "It seems to
have been a place of some attraction," says Mr.
Larwood, "since it was honoured by the repeated
visits of an Indian king." Thus the Daily Advertiser of July 12, 1762, says: "On Friday last the
Cherokee king and his two chiefs were so greatly
pleased with the curiosities of the Dwarf's Tavern,
in Chelsea Fields, that they were there again on
Sunday, at seven in the evening, to drink tea, and
will be there again in a few days." The reputation
of the tavern, under its pygmean proprietor, was
but brief, as the "unparalleled" Coan, as he is
styled, died within two years from the above date.
In the reign of William III., the French Huguenot refugees had two chapels in Chelsea: the
one in "Cook's Grounds," now used by the Congregationalists, and another at Little Chelsea, not
far from Kensington.
"Chelsea," observes a writer in the Mirror, in
1833, "though now proverbial for its dulness,
was formerly a place of great gaiety. Thousands
flocked to Salter's—or, as it was dubbed, 'Don
Saltero's'—coffee-house in Cheyne Walk; the
Chelsea buns were eaten by princesses; and the
public were allowed to walk in thirteen acres of
avenues of limes and chestnut-trees in the gardens
adjoining the College. This privilege was disallowed in 1806; but within the last few weeks
these grounds have been again thrown open to
the public." The ground round about Chelsea
and its neighbourhood, like that of Bermondsey,
and other low-lying districts bordering upon the
Thames, is peculiarly adapted for the growth of
vegetables, fruits, and flowers; indeed, Chelsea
has long been remarkable for its gardens and
nurseries. Dr. Mackay, in his "Extraordinary
Popular Delusions," tells us that about the time
of Her Majesty's accession, there was a gardener
in the King's Road, Chelsea, in whose catalogue
a single tulip was marked at two hundred guineas—a remnant, perhaps, of the tulip-mania, which,
two centuries before, had ruined half of the
merchants of Holland, and threatened to prove
as disastrous here as the "South Sea Bubble."
It may be added, too, that the first red geranium
seen in England is said to have been raised by
a Mr. Davis here, about the year 1822.
Chelsea, which was once a rustic and retired
village, has been gradually absorbed into the
metropolis by the advance of the army of bricklayers and mortar-layers, and now forms fairly a
portion of London, Pimlico and Belgravia having
supplied the connecting link. Environed though
it is by the growing suburbs, the place has still
an old-fashioned look about it, which the modern,
trimly-laid-out flower-gardens on the new embankment only tend to increase. Looked at from the
Battersea side of the river, with the barges floating
lazily along past the solid red-brick houses, screened
by sheltering trees, Chelsea presents such a picture
as the old Dutch "masters" would have revelled
in, especially as the Thames here widens into
a fine "reach," well known to oarsmen for the
rough "seas" which they encounter there on
those occasions when the wind meets the tide;
in fact, the river is wider at this particular spot
than anywhere "above bridge." In the reign of
Charles II. it was such a fashionable rendezvous
that it was frequently called "Hyde Park on the
Thames."
Bowack thus writes, in an account of Chelsea,
published in 1705:—"The situation of it upon
the Thames is very pleasant, and standing in
a small bay, or angle, made by the meeting of
Chelsea and Battersea Reaches, it has a most
delightful prospect on that river for near four
miles, as far as Vauxhall eastward, and as Wandsworth to the west."
In the last century, Chelsea being, in fact, quite
a suburban place, had its own society; "its many
honourable and worthy inhabitants," as we are told
by Bowack, "being not more remarkable for their
titles, estates, and employments, than for their
civility and condescension, and their kind and
facetious tempers, living in a perfect amity among
themselves, and having a general meeting every day
at a coffee-house near the church, well known for
a pretty collection of varieties in nature and art,
some of which are very curious." The coffee-house
here mentioned was the renowned Don Saltero's,
of which we shall have more to say in the next
chapter.
Mr. Peter Cunningham speaks of Chelsea as "at
one time the Islington of the West-end," and thus
enumerates the articles for which it has from time
to time been famous:—Its manor house, its college,
its botanic garden, its hospital, its amusements at
Ranelagh, its waterworks, its buns, its china, and
its custards.
"About the year 1796," writes Faulkner, in his
"History of Chelsea," "I was present at a staghunt in Chelsea. The animal swam across the river
from Battersea, and made for Lord Cremorne's
grounds. Upon being driven from thence, he ran
along the water-side as far as the church, and
turning up Church Lane, at last took refuge in
Mrs. Hutchins's barn, where he was taken alive."
The connection of Chelsea with Westminster,
already stated in our account (fn. 2) of the "Monster"
Tavern, Pimlico, is probably of very old standing,
for even during the rule of our Norman kings it
appears to have been one of the manors belonging
to the abbey of St. Peter. Little, however, is
known with certainty of the history of this now
extensive parish till the time of Henry VII., when
the manor was held by Sir Reginald Bray, from
whom it descended to Margaret, only child of his
next brother, John, who married William, Lord
Sandys. From Lord Sandys the manor passed, in
exchange for other lands, to that rapacious king,
Henry VIII., by whom it was assigned to Katharine
Parr, as part of her marriage jointure. Faulkner,
in his work above quoted, says that "Henry was
probably induced to possess this manor from having
observed, in his frequent visits to Sir Thomas More,
the pleasantness of the situation on the bank of
the Thames; and, from the salubrity of the air,
deeming it a fit residence for his infant daughter,
the Princess Elizabeth, then between three and
four years of age. But after having obtained it,
finding that the manor house was ancient, and
at that time in the possession of the Lawrence
family, he erected a new manor house, on the
eastern side of the spot where Winchester House
lately stood, and supplied it with water from a
spring at Kensington." The manor was subsequently held by John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland; by Anne, Duchess of Somerset, widow of
the "Protector;" by John, first Lord Stanhope,
of Harrington; by Katharine, Lady Howard, wife
of the Lord Admiral; by James, first Duke of
Hamilton; by Charles, Viscount Cheyne; and by
Sir Hans Sloane, the celebrated physician, who
purchased it in 1712 from the Cheyne family,
and from whom it passed by marriage to Charles,
second Lord Cadogan, of Oakley, through which
alliance the manor of Chelsea became vested in
the Cadogans, with whom it still remains.
The old manor house stood near the church, and
was sold by Henry VIII. to the Lawrence family,
after whom Lawrence Street derives its name. The
new manor house stood on that part of Cheyne
Walk fronting the Thames, between the Pier Hotel
and the house formerly known as "Don Saltero's
Coffee-house." The building, of which a view of
the north front is engraved in Faulkner's "History
of Chelsea" (see page 49), was of a quadrangular
form, enclosing a spacious court, and was partly
embattled. The mansion was pulled down shortly
after the death of Sir Hans Sloane, in the middle of
the last century, and a row of houses erected on
the site.
Like Kensington, Chelsea has been from time
to time the residence of many individuals of high
rank, who were attracted to it on account of its
nearness to the Court, and its easiness of access at
a time when the roads of the suburbs were bad, and
the Thames was the "silent highway" to families
who could afford to keep their barge. So far as
rank and station are concerned, perhaps the first
and foremost of its residents was the Princess
(afterwards Queen) Elizabeth. After her father's
death, Miss Lucy Aikin tells us, in her "Memoirs
of the Court" of that sovereign, the princess "had
been consigned to the care and protection of the
Queen Dowager (Katharine Parr), with whom she
usually made her abode at one or other of her
jointure houses at Chelsea, or at Hanworth, near
Hounslow."
In the reign of Elizabeth, the Lord High Admiral,
the Earl of Effingham, was among the residents of
this place; and we are told by Bishop Goodman
that, in her "progresses" from Richmond to Whitehall, the "Virgin Queen" would often dine with his
lordship at Chelsea, and afterwards set out thence
towards London, late at night, by torchlight, in
order that the Lord Mayor and aldermen, and the
other loyal citizens, might not see those wrinkles
and that ugly throat of hers, with which Horace
Walpole has made us familiar in his representation
of a coin struck shortly before her death.
Thomas Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, who
acquired high renown at the battles of Cressy and
Poictiers, appears to have occasionally resided at
Chelsea. It is supposed that he occupied a house
and premises which afterwards belonged to Richard
Beauchamp, Bishop of Salisbury, and which were
granted by Richard III. to Elizabeth, widow of
Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk, for life, "to
be held by the service of a red rose." The site of
this mansion, however, is now unknown, as also is
the spot once occupied by a house in Chelsea
which was possessed by William, Marquis of
Berkeley, an adherent of the Earl of Richmond
(afterwards Henry VII.).
In April, 1663, we find Lord Sandwich at his
Chelsea lodging, eating cakes made by the mistress
of the house, and, it may be added, the mother of
his own mistress—cakes so good that, says Pepys,
"they were fit to present to my Lady Castlemaine"—a curious parody of the lines of the
old nursery rhyme:—
"Now was not that a dainty dish
To set before a king?"
Among the residents of Chelsea in the last century was Lord Cremorne, who occupied a house
called Chelsea Farm, which was situated at a short
distance from the bridge, on the site now covered
by Cremorne Gardens. Lady Cremorne is celebrated in the "Percy Anecdotes" as the best mistress of a household that ever lived. She had a
servant, Elizabeth Palfrey, who had lived with her
for forty-eight years, during the latter half of the
time as housekeeper, and who so regulated affairs
that in all that long time not one of the female
servants was known to have left her place, except
in order to be married. Such mistresses are rare
now, and probably were not common even in her
day. As late as 1826, the name of Viscountess
Cremorne appears in the "Royal Blue Book," with
"Chelsea Farm" as her country residence. The
edifice, which was built of brick, overlooked the
river, from which it was separated by a lawn,
pleasantly shaded by stately trees. The house had
a somewhat irregular appearance externally, and
little to boast of in the way of architecture; but
the interior was commodious, and the best suite of
rooms well adapted to the use of a distinguished
family. Here was a small but judicious collection
of pictures, formed by Viscount Cremorne, among
which were some by noted Flemish and Italian
masters.
Lindsey Row and Lindsey Place, facing the
river immediately westward of Battersea Bridge,
mark the site of Lindsey House, the residence of
the Berties, Earls of Lindsey. About the middle
of the last century the mansion was purchased by
Count Zinzendorf, a leader of the peculiar sect
known as Moravians, for the purpose of establishing a settlement of that society in Chelsea; but
the project failed; the building was again sold, and
subsequently demolished, or cut up into private
tenements.
In a small house in Chelsea, rented from Lord
Cheyne, died, in difficulties, the beautiful Duchess
of Mazarine, one of the frail beauties of the Court
of Charles II.
In Lyson's "Environs," we read that about the
year 1722 Sir Robert Walpole, the well-known
prime minister of George II., "became possessed
of a house and garden in the stable-yard at
Chelsea." The house was "next the college,"
adjoining Gough House. Sir Robert frequently
resided there, improved and added to the house,
and considerably enlarged the gardens by a purchase of some land from the Gough family; he
erected an octagonal summer-house at the head of
the terrace, and a large green-house, where he had
a fine collection of exotics. A good story is told
about Queen Caroline, when dining one day here
with Lady Walpole. Sir Paul Methuen, who was
one of the company, was remarkable for his love of
romances. The queen asked him what he had
been reading of late in his own way. "Nothing,
madam," said Sir Paul; "I have now commenced,
instead of romances, a very foolish study, 'The
History of the Kings and Queens of England.'"
Horace Walpole informs us that he remembered
La Belle Jennings (afterwards Duchess of Marlborough) coming to his parents' house to solicit a
pension.
Shrewsbury House, or, as it was sometimes
called, Alston House, in Cheyne Walk, near the
waterside, if we may trust Priscilla Wakefield's
"Perambulations in London," was a paper manufactory at the time of its demolition in 1814. It
was an irregular brick building, forming three sides
of a quadrangle. The principal room was upwards
of 100 feet long, and was originally wainscoted
with carved oak. One of the rooms was painted
in imitation of marble, and others were ornamented
with certain "curious portraits on panel." Leading
from the premises towards the King's Road was
a subterranean passage, which is traditionally said
to have communicated with a cave, or dungeon,
situated at some distance from the house.
Winchester House, the Palace of the Bishops of
Winchester from about the middle of the seventeenth down to the commencement of the present
century, stood on the spot now occupied by the
Pier Hotel, and its gardens adjoined Shrewsbury
House. It was a heavy brick building, of low
proportions, and quite devoid of any architectural
ornament. The interior was fairly commodious,
and "much enriched by the collection of antiques
and specimens of natural history" placed there by
Bishop North, the last prelate who occupied it.
Bishop Hoadley, who died here in 1761, was so
lax in his ideas of Church authority, that some
free-thinking Christians were wittily styled by
Archbishop Secker, "Christians secundum usum
Winton," in allusion to the customary title of books
printed "for the use of the Winchester scholars."
The chief interest of Chelsea, however, not only
to the antiquary, but to the educated Englishman,
must lie in the fact that it was the much-loved
home of that great man whose memory English
history will never allow to die, Sir Thomas More.
Here he resided, surrounded by his family, in a
house about midway between the Thames and the
King's Road, on the site of what is now Beaufort
Street. In Aubrey's "Letters from the Bodleian,"
we read:—"His country house was at Chelsey,
in Middlesex, where Sir John Danvers built his
house. The chimney-piece, of marble, in Sir John's
chamber, was the chimney-piece of Sir Thomas
More's chamber, as Sir John himself told me.
Where the gate is now, adorned with two noble
pyramids, there stood anciently a gate-house, which
was flatt on the top, leaded, from whence was a
most pleasant prospect of the Thames and the
fields beyond; on this place the Lord Chancellor
More was wont to recreate himself and contemplate."
Erasmus—himself one of the most cherished
friends of Sir Thomas—describes the house as
"neither mean nor subject to envy, yet magnificent
and commodious enough." The building, which
was erected early in the sixteenth century, was
successively called Buckingham House and Beaufort House, and was pulled down about the middle
of the last century. At the end of the garden Sir
Thomas erected a pile of buildings, consisting of a
chapel, gallery, and library, all being designed for
his own retirement. His piety, staunch and firm
as was his adherence to the Roman Catholic creed,
is acknowledged even by Protestant writers. Wood,
in his "Ecclesiastical Antiquities," says:—"More
rose early, and assembled his family morning and
evening in the chapel, when certain prayers and
Psalms were recited. He heard mass daily himself, and expected all his household to do so on
Sundays and festivals; whilst, on the eves of great
feasts, all watched till matins. Every Friday, as
was also his custom on some other occasions, he
retired to the new buildings, where he spent the
whole day in prayer and meditation."

CREMORNE FARM, 1829.
Sir Thomas usually attended Divine service on
Sundays at Chelsea Church, and very often assisted
at the celebration of mass. The Duke of Norfolk
coming one day to dine with him during his
chancellorship, found him in church with a surplice on, and singing in the choir. "God's body,
my Lord Chancellor!" said the duke, as they
returned to his house. "What! a parish clerk! a
parish clerk! you dishonour the king and his
office." "Nay," said Sir Thomas, "you may not
think your master and mine will be offended with
me for serving God, his master, or thereby count
his office dishonoured."

OLD MANSION IN CHELSEA. (From Faulkner's "Chelsea.")
1. Church Place, 1641.
2. Gough House, 1760.
3. Shrewsbury House, 1540.
4. Beaufort House, 1628.
5. Winchester House
In later years the chapel in More's house appears
to have been free to the public, for in various
marriage licences, granted towards the commencement of the last century, persons were to be
married "in the parish church, in the chapel of
Chelsea College, or the chapel of Beaufort House."
The only fragment of the house remaining down
to the present century was a portion of the cellars,
which existed beneath the house No. 17, forming
one of the line of dwellings now known by the
name of Beaufort Row. An avenue, with a high
wall on each side, constituted the chief approach
to the house, or that from the river-side; and
fronting the entrance of this avenue were the stairs
used by Sir Thomas More when descending to
his barge. A terrace-walk, which stretched from
the house towards the east, is described in the
legal writings of the estate as being so much raised
that it was ascended by several steps. After the
demolition of the house a portion of the ground
was occupied as a burial-place for the Moravian
Society, and the remains of the stables were converted into public schools.
The most important circumstances in the life of
Sir Thomas More are too well known to need
repetition in these pages. His domestic life at
Chelsea has been described by Erasmus in the
following words:—"There he converses with his
wife, his son, his daughter-in-law, his three daughters
and their husbands, with eleven grandchildren.
There is not any man living so affectionate as he,
and he loveth his old wife as well as if she was a
young maid. You would say there was in that
place Plato's Academy; but I do his house an
injury in comparing it to Plato's Academy, where
there were only disputations of numbers and geometrical figures, and sometimes of moral virtues.
I should rather call his house a school, or university
of Christian religion, for though there is none
therein but readeth or studreth the liberal sciences,
their special care is piety and virtue; there is no
quarrelling or intemperate words heard; none seen
idle; that worthy gentleman doth not govern with
proud and lofty words, but with well-timed and
courteous benevolence; everybody performeth his
duty, yet is there always alacrity; neither is sober
mirth anything wanting."
Erasmus was the correspondent of Sir Thomas
More long before he was personally acquainted
with his illustrious friend; and although strongly
dissimilar in religious opinions, when the great
reformer and scholar visited England he was the
frequent guest of Sir Thomas at Chelsea. The
house of More was, indeed, the resort of all who
were conspicuous for learning and taste. Collet,
Linacre, and Tunstall often partook of the hospitality of his table. Here Sir Thomas often entertained "Master John Heywood," the early English
playwright, and cracked with him many a joke.
It is said that it was through Sir Thomas More
that he was introduced to the Lady Mary, and so
was brought under the notice of Henry VIII.,
who appointed him the Court jester. Those were,
indeed, strange days, when a buffoon dared to
laugh in the face of a sovereign who could send to
the scaffold so venerable, so grave and learned a
scholar, and so loyal a subject of the Crown. The
wit of Sir Thomas More was almost boundless, and
he was also no mean actor. It is related of him
that when an interlude was performed he would
"make one among the players, occasionally coming
upon them by surprise, and without rehearsal fall
into a character, and support the part by his
extemporaneous invention, and acquit himself with
credit." It was probably by his intercourse with
Heywood that the latent dramatic powers of the
great Lord Chancellor were called out.
Henry VIII., to whom More owed his rise and
fall, frequently came to Chelsea, and spent whole
days in the most familiar manner with his learned
friend; and "it is supposed," says Faulkner, in his
"History of Chelsea," "that the king's answer to
Luther was prepared and arranged for the public
eye, with the assistance of Sir Thomas, during
these visits." Notwithstanding all this familiarity,
Sir Thomas understood the temper of his royal
master very well, as the following anecdote sufficiently testifies:—"One day the king came unexpectedly to Chelsea, and dined with him, and after
dinner walked in his garden for the space of an
hour, holding his arm about his neck. As soon
as his Majesty was gone, Sir Thomas's son-in-law
observed to him how happy he was, since the king
had treated him with that familiarity he had never
used to any person before, except Cardinal Wolsey,
with whom he once saw his Majesty walk arm-inarm." "I thank our Lord," answered Sir Thomas,
"I find his grace my very good lord indeed; and I
believe he doth as singularly love me as any subject
within this realm; however, son Roper, I may tell
thee I have no cause to be proud thereof, for if my
head would win him a castle in France, it should
not fail to go off."
Sir Thomas More is said to have converted one
part of his house into a prison for the restraint of
heretics; and according to a passage in "Foxe's
Book of Martyrs," he here kept in prison, and
whipped in his garden, one John Baynham, a
lawyer, who was suspected of holding the doctrines
of Wycliffe, and who was ultimately burnt at Smithfield. But it must be remembered that he lived
in an age when religious persecution was practised
by all parties, and when, as Byron writes—
"Christians did burn each other, quite persuaded
That all th' Apostles would have done as they did."
More's fondness for animals is an interesting
and curious peculiarity. Erasmus tells us, that
watching their growth, development, and dispositions, was one of his chief pleasures. "At Chelsea
may be seen many varieties of birds, and an ape, a
fox, a weasel, and a ferret. Moreover, if anything
foreign, or otherwise remarkable, comes in his way,
he greedily buys it up, and he has his house completely furnished with these objects; so that, as
you enter, there is everywhere something to catch
the eye, and he renews his own pleasure as often
as he becomes a witness to the delight of others."
With one of his favourite dogs, Sir Thomas would
frequently sit in fine weather on the top of the
gate-house, in order to enjoy the agreeable prospect.
A curious story is told in the "Percy Anecdotes,"
which will bear repeating:—"It happened one day
that a 'Tom o' Bedlam,' a maniac vagrant, got upstairs while Sir Thomas was there, and coming up
to him, cried out, 'Leap, Tom, leap!' at the same
time, attempting to throw his lordship over the
battlements. Sir Thomas, who was a feeble old
man, and incapable of much resistance, had the
presence of mind to say, 'Let us first throw this
little dog over.' The maniac threw the dog down
immediately. 'Pretty sport,' said the Lord Chancellor; 'now go down and bring him up; then
we'll try again.' While the poor madman went
down for the dog, his lordship made fast the door
of the stairs, and, calling for help, saved his life."
Sir Thomas More is to be remembered also with
gratitude on quite another score, and on higher
grounds; for he was the generous patron of
Holbein, the Court painter, who occupied rooms in
his house for three years, and was employed in
drawing portraits of his patron and his family.
Hoddesdon, in his "History of More," says:—"He seldom used to feast noble men, but his poor
neighbours often, whom he would visit in their
houses, and bestow upon them his large liberality—not groats, but crowns of gold—even more than
according to their wants. He hired a house also
for many aged people in Chelsea, whom he daily
relieved, and it was his daughter Margaret's charge
to see them want nothing; and when he was a
private lawyer he would take no fees of poor folks,
widows, nor pupils."
By indefatigable application Sir Thomas More
cleared the Court of Chancery of all its causes. One
day, having ended a cause, he called for the next,
and was told that "there was no other depending
in the court." He was delighted to hear it, and
ordered it to be inserted in the records of the
court. This gave rise to the epigram—not the
worst in the English language—which we have
already quoted in our account of Lincoln's Inn. (fn. 3)
After having held the Great Seal for two years and
a half, Sir Thomas, on being pressed by the king to
hasten on his divorce from Catherine of Arragon,
resigned his office in May, 1532. He retired
cheerfully to the privacy of domestic life, and to
the studies which he was not long to enjoy. On
the day after he resigned the chancellorship, Sir
Thomas went to church, as usual, with his wife and
family, none of whom he had yet informed of his
resignation. During the service, as was his custom,
he sat in the choir in a surplice. After the service
it was usual for one of his attendants to go to her
ladyship's pew and say, "My lord is gone before."
But this day the ex-Chancellor came himself, and,
making a low bow said, "Madam, my lord is
gone." Then, on their way home, we are told, "to
her great mortification, he unriddled his mournful
pleasantry, by telling her his lordship was gone,
in the loss of his official dignities." He was included in the bill of attainder introduced into
Parliament to punish Elizabeth Barton—"the holy
maid of Kent"—and her accomplices; but on
his disclaiming any surviving faith in the nun, or
any share in her treasonable designs, his name was
ultimately struck out of the bill. On the passing
of the Act of Succession, which declared the king's
marriage with Catherine invalid, and fixed the
succession in the children of Anne Boleyn, More
declined to accept it, and refused to take the oath.
A few days afterwards he was committed to the
Tower, and in the space of a few short months, as
is known to every reader of English history, was
placed on his trial for high treason, found guilty, and
executed on Tower Hill. More retained his mild
and characteristic jocularity to the last. "Going
up the scaffold, which was so weak that it was
ready to fall," we read in Roper's "Life of More,"
"he said hurriedly to the lieutenant, 'I pray you,
Master Lieutenant, see me safe up; and for my
coming down, let me shift for myself.' When the
axe of the executioner was about to fall, he asked
for a moment's delay while he moved aside his
beard. 'Pity that should be cut,' he murmured;
'that surely has not committed treason.'"
"Thou art the cause of this man's death," said
Henry VIII. to Anne Boleyn when the news of his
execution was brought to the guilty couple; and
the king rose, left his paramour, and shut himself
up in his chamber "in great perturbation of spirit."
At that perturbation we need not wonder—the
greatest man of the realm had been beheaded
as a victim to the royal lust. It may be truly
said that during the reign of Henry VIII. there
lived and moved, in a prominent position, but one
man whose memory is held in high esteem by all
parties, and that man was Sir Thomas More.
Protestants as well as Roman Catholics alike venerated his name, while they held his life up as a
model for all time, and even the more extreme
Protestants had less to say in his disfavour than
about any other leading son of the Church. Risen
through his own exertions from comparative obscurity, Sir Thomas More held the highest lay
position in the land, bore off the palm in learning
as in probity, was faithful to his God as well as
to his king and to his own lofty principles, and
died because he would not and could not make
his conscience truckle to the lewd desires of
his earthly master. A grand lawyer, a great
statesman, a profound politician, an example of
domesticity for all generations, a deep student
of the things of the spiritual as well as of the temporal life, and a Catholic of Catholics—Sir Thomas
More earned and commanded, and will continue to
command, the profoundest respect of all highminded Englishmen. Sir Thomas More, indeed,
was justly called by Thomson, in his "Seasons"—
"A dauntless soul erect, who smiled on death."
Sir Thomas More's house appears to have become
afterwards the residence of royalty. Anne of
Cleves died here in 1557; and Katharine Parr
occupied it after her re-marriage with Admiral
Seymour, having charge of the Princess Elizabeth,
then a child of thirteen.
The old parish church of Chelsea, dedicated to
St. Luke, stands parallel with the river. It is constructed chiefly of brick, and is by no means conspicuous for beauty. It appears to have been
erected piecemeal at different periods, and the
builders do not seem to have aimed in the slightest
degree at architectural arrangement; nevertheless,
though the building is sadly incongruous and much
barbarised, its interior is still picturesque. The
chancel and a part of the north aisle are the only
portions which can lay claim to antiquity; the
former was rebuilt shortly before the Reformation.
The eastern end of the north aisle is the chapel of
the Lawrence family, which was probably founded
in the fourteenth century. The southern aisle was
erected at the cost of good Sir Thomas More, who
also gave the communion plate. With a forecast
of the coming troubles, he remarked, "Good men
give these things, and bad men will soon take
them away." At the commencement of the present
century modern windows, with frames of woodwork, were introduced. These, it need hardly be
said, in no way improved the already mean appearance of the fabric. More's chapel, which was an
absolute freehold, and beyond the control of the
bishop, was allowed to fall into a very dilapidated
condition; but it has recently been purchased by
a Mr. R. H. Davies, who has transferred it to
the rector, churchwardens, and trustees of the new
church of St. Luke, under whose charge the old
parish church is placed; and it has since been
partially restored. The church was considerably
enlarged in the middle of the seventeenth century,
at which time the heavy brick tower at the west
end was erected. The interior consists of a nave,
chancel, and two aisles, comprehending the two
chapels above mentioned. The roof of the chancel
is arched, and it is separated from the nave by a
semi-circular arch, above which hang several escutcheons and banners; the latter, very faded and
tattered, are said to have been the needlework of
Queen Charlotte, by whom they were presented to
the Royal Volunteers. They were deposited here
on the disbandment of the regiment. Near the
south-west corner of the church, resting upon a
window-sill, is an ancient book-case and desk, on
which are displayed a chained Bible, a Book of
Homilies, and some other works, including "Foxe's
Book of Martyrs." In the porch, placed upon
brackets on the wall, is a bell, which was presented
to the church by the Hon. William Ashburnham,
in 1679, in commemoration of his escape from
drowning. It appears, from a tablet on the wall,
that Mr. Ashburnham was walking on the bank of
the Thames at Chelsea one very dark night in
winter, apparently in a meditative mood, and had
strayed into the river, when he was suddenly brought
to a sense of his situation by hearing the church
clock strike nine. Mr. Ashburnham left a sum of
money to the parish to pay for the ringing of the
bell every evening at nine o'clock, but the custom
was discontinued in 1825. The bell, after lying
neglected for many years in the clock-room, was
placed in its present position after a silence of
thirty years.
The monuments in the church are both numerous and interesting. On the north side of the
chancel is an ancient altar-tomb without any inscription, but supposed to belong to the family of
Bray, of Eaton. On the south wall of the chancel
is a tablet of black marble, surmounted by a flat
Gothic arch, in memory of Sir Thomas More. It
was originally erected by himself, in 1532, some
three years before his death; but being much
worn, it was restored, at the expense of Sir John
Lawrence, of Chelsea, in the reign of Charles I.,
and again by subscription, in 1833.
The Latin inscription was written by More
himself; but an allusion to "heretics," which it
contained, is stated to have been purposely omitted
when the monument was restored. A blank space
is left for the word. Although More's first wife
lies buried here, the place of interment of Sir
Thomas himself is somewhat doubtful. Weever
and Anthony Wood say that his daughter, Margaret
Roper, removed his body to Chelsea. Earlier
writers, however, differ as to the precise spot of
his burial, some saying that he was interred in the
belfry, and others near the vestry of the chapel
of St. Peter, in the Tower. It is recorded that his
daughter took thither the body of Bishop Fisher,
that it might lie near her father's, and, therefore, it
is probable that the Tower still contains his ashes.
The head of Sir Thomas More is deposited in St.
Dunstan's Church at Canterbury, where it is preserved in a niche in the wall, secured by an iron
grate, near the coffin of Margaret Roper.
In the south aisle is a fine monument to Lord and
Lady Dacre, dated 1594. It was this Lady Dacre
who erected the almshouses in Westminster which
bore her name. (fn. 4) She was sister to Thomas Sackville, Earl of Dorset, the poet. In the north aisle
is the monument of Lady Jane Cheyne, daughter
of William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle, and
wife of Charles Cheyne, after whom Cheyne Row
is named. The monument is the work of Bernini,
and is said to have cost £500. Here is buried
Adam Littleton, Prebendary of Westminster and
Rector of Chelsea, the author of a once celebrated
Latin Dictionary. He was at one time "usher"
of Westminster School; and after the Restoration
he took pupils at Chelsea. He wrote the preface
to Cicero's Works, as edited by Gale, and was a
perfect master of the Latin style. Collier says of him
that his erudition gained for him the title of "the
Great Dictator of Learning." In the churchyard
is a monument to Sir Hans Sloane, the physician.
It consists of an inscribed pedestal, upon which
is placed a large vase of white marble, entwined
with serpents, and the whole is surmounted by a
portico supported by four pillars.
In the old burial-ground lie Andrew Millar, the
eminent London bookseller, and John B. Cipriani,
one of the earliest members of the Royal Academy. (fn. 5)
The new church of St. Luke, situated between
King's Road and Fulham Road, was built by James
Savage, in 1820, in imitation of the style of the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, and has a pinnacled tower, nearly 150 feet high. It is, however,
a poor specimen of modern Gothic. The most
remarkable feature of the building is the roof of
the nave, which is vaulted with stone, with a clear
height of sixty feet from the pavement to the crown
of the vault. The porch extends the whole width
of the west front, and is divided by piers and arches
into five bays, the central one of which forms the
lower storey of the tower. The large east window is
filled with stained glass, and beneath it is a fine
altar-screen of antique design. Immediately over
the altar is a painting, "The Entombing of Christ,"
said to be by Northcote. The church will seat
about 2,000 persons, and was erected at a cost of
about £40,000—the first stone being laid by the
Duke of Wellington. The first two rectors of the
new church were Dr. Gerard V. Wellesley (whose
name is still retained in Wellesley Street), brother
of the Duke of Wellington, and the Rev. Charles
Kingsley, father of Charles Kingsley, Canon of Westminster, and author of "Alton Locke," &c.
CHAPTER VI.
CHELSEA (continued).
"Then, farewell, my trim-built wherry;
Oars, and coat, and badge, farewell.
Never more at Chelsea Ferry
Shall your Thomas take a spell."—Dibdin.
Cheyne Walk—An Eccentric Miser—Dominicetti, an Italian Quack—Don Saltero's Coffee House and Museum—Catalogue of Rarities in the
Museum—Thomas Carlyle—Chelsea Embankment—Albert Bridge—The Mulberry Garden—The "Swan" Inn—The Rowing Matches for
Doggett's Coat and Badge—The Botanic Gardens—The Old Bun-house.
Visitors to Chelsea by water, landing at the
Cadogan Pier, will not fail to be struck by the
antique appearance of the long terrace of houses
stretching away eastward, overlooking the river,
and screened by a row of trees. This is Cheyne
Walk, so named after Lord Cheyne, who owned the
manor of Chelsea near the close of the seventeenth
century. The houses are mostly of dark-red brick,
with heavy window-frames, and they have about
them altogether an old-fashioned look, such as we
are accustomed to find in buildings of the time of
Queen Anne. The place, from its air of repose
and seclusion, has always reckoned among its inhabitants a large number of successful artists and
literary celebrities.

CHEYNE WALK AND CADOGAN PIER.
Here, in a large house very scantily furnished,
lived during the latter portion of his existence—we can scarcely call it life—Mr. John Camden
Neild, the eccentric miser, who, at his decease
in August, 1852, left his scrapings and savings,
amounting to half a million sterling, to the Queen,
"begging Her Majesty's most gracious acceptance
of the same for her sole use and benefit, and that
of her heirs." He was buried at North Marston,
near Aylesbury, where he held a landed property,
and where the Queen ordered a painted window
to be put up to his memory. A sketch of the
career of this modern rival of John Elwes will
be found in Chambers' "Book of Days." Here,
too, lived Dominicetti, an Italian quack, who
made a great noise in his day by the introduction of medicated baths, which he established in
Cheyne Walk, in 1765. It is thus immortalised
in Boswell's "Life of Johnson:"—"There was a
pretty large circle this evening. Dr. Johnson was
in very good humour, lively, and ready to talk upon
all subjects. Dominicetti being mentioned, he
would not allow him any merit. 'There is nothing
in all this boasted system. No, sir; medicated
baths can be no better than warm water; their
only effect can be that of tepid moisture.' One of
the company took the other side, maintaining that
medicines of various sorts, and some, too, of most
powerful effect, are introduced into the human
frame by the medium of the pores; and therefore,
when warm water is impregnated with salutiferous
substances, it may produce great effects as a bath.
The Doctor, determined to be master of the field,
had recourse to the device which Goldsmith imputed to him in the witty words of one of Cibber's
comedies, 'There is no arguing with Johnson; for
when his pistol misses fire, he knocks you down
with the butt-end of it.' He turned to the gentleman: 'Well, sir, go to Dominicetti, and get thyself
fumigated; but be sure that the steam be directed
to thy head, for that is the peccant part.' This
produced a triumphant roar of laughter from the
motley assembly of philosophers, printers, and dependents, male and female." Dominicetti is said to
have had under his care upwards of 16,000 persons,
including Edward, Duke of York. He spent some
£37,000 on his establishment, but became bankrupt in 1782, when he disappeared.

CARLYLE'S HOUSE, GREAT CHEYNE ROW.
In the middle of Cheyne Walk is, or was till
recently (for it was doomed to destruction in 1866),
the house known to readers of anecdote biography
as "Don Saltero's Coffee House," celebrated not
only as a place of entertainment, but also as a
repository of natural and other curiosities. John
Salter, its founder, was an old and trusty servant of
Sir Hans Sloane, who, from time to time, gave him
all sorts of curiosities. With these he adorned
the house, which he opened as a suburban coffeehouse, about the year 1690. The earliest notice of
Salter's Museum is to be found in the thirty-fourth
number of the Tatler, published in June, 1709, in
which its owner figures as "Don Saltero," and
several of its curious contents are specified by the
writer, Sir Richard Steele. Beside the donations
of Sir Hans Sloane, at the head of the "Complete
List of Benefactors to Don Saltero's Coffee-room
of Curiosities," printed in 1739, figure the names of
Sir John Cope, Baronet, and his son, "the first
generous benefactors." There is an account of the
exhibition in the Gentleman's Magazine for 1799,
where it is stated that Rear-Admiral Sir John
Munden, and other officers who had been much
upon the coasts of Spain, enriched it with many
curiosities, and gave its owner the name of "Don
Saltero;" but the list of donors does not include
the admiral, though the name of "Mr. Munden"
occurs in the list subjoined to the nineteenth
edition of the catalogue. The title by which
Salter was so well known in his own day may be
accounted for even at this distance of time by the
notice of him and his collection, as immortalised in
the pages of Sir Richard Steele. "When I came
into the coffee-house," he says, "I had not time to
salute the company before my eye was diverted by
ten thousand gimcracks, round the room and on
the ceiling." The Don was famous for his punch,
and his skill on the fiddle. "Indeed," says Steele,
"I think he does play the 'Merry Christ-Church
Bells' pretty justly; but he confessed to me he did
it rather to show he was orthodox than that he
valued himself upon the music itself." This description is probably faithful, as well as humorous,
since he continues, "When my first astonishment
was over, there comes to me a sage, of a thin
and meagre countenance, which aspect made me
doubtful whether reading or fretting had made it so
philosophic."
In the Weekly Journal of Saturday, June 22nd,
1723, we read the following poetical announcement of the treasures to be seen at this coffee-house,
which may be regarded as authentic and literally
true, since it is sanctioned by the signature of the
proprietor himself:—
"Sir,
Fifty years since to Chelsea great,
From Rodman, on the Irish main,
I strolled, with maggots in my pate,
Where, much improved, they still remain.
"Through various employs I've passed—
A scraper, virtuoso, projector,
Tooth-drawer, trimmer, and at last,
I'm now a gimcrack whim collector.
"Monsters of all sorts here are seen,
Strange things in nature as they grow so,
Some relicks of the Sheba queen,
And fragments of the famed Bob Crusoe.
"Knicknacks, too, dangle round the wall,
Some in glass cases, some on shelf;
But what's the rarest sight of all,
Your humble servant shows himself.
"On this my chiefest hope depends—
Now if you will my cause espouse,
In journals pray direct your friends
To my Museum Coffee-house;
"And, in requital for the timely favour,
I'll gratis bleed, draw teeth, and be your shaver:
Nay, that your pate may with my noddle tally,
And you shine bright as I do—marry! shall ye
Freely consult your revelation, Molly;
Nor shall one jealous thought create a huff,
For she has taught me manners long enough."
"Don Saltero.
"Chelsea Knackatory."
The date of Salter's death does not appear to be
known precisely, but the museum was continued
by his daughter, a Mrs. Hall, until about the accession of George III. We know little of the
subsequent history of the house until January,
1799, when the whole place, with the museum of
curiosities, was sold by auction by Mr. Harwood.
They are described in the catalogue as follows:—"A substantial and well-erected dwelling-house
and premises, delightfully situate, facing the river
Thames, commanding beautiful views of the Surrey
hills and the adjacent country, in excellent repair,
held for a term of thirty-nine years from Christmas
last, at a ground-rent of £3 10s. per annum.
Also the valuable collection of curiosities, comprising a curious model of our Saviour's sepulchre,
a Roman bishop's crosier, antique coins and medals,
minerals, fossils, antique fire-arms, curious birds,
fishes, and other productions of nature, and a large
collection of various antiquities and curiosities,
glass-cases, &c. N.B. The curiosities will be
sold the last day. May be viewed six days preceding the sale. Catalogues at sixpence each."
The number of lots was a hundred and twenty-one;
and the entire produce of the sale appears to have
been little more than £50. The highest price
given for a single lot was £1 16s.—lot 98, consisting of "a very curious model of our Blessed
Saviour's sepulchre at Jerusalem, very neatly inlaid
with mother of pearl."
"It is not improbable," writes Mr. Smith in his
"Historical and Literary Curiosities," "that this
very celebrated collection was not preserved either
entire or genuine until the time of its dispersion;
since the gift of John Pennant, of Chelsea, the
great-uncle of Thomas Pennant, the topographical
writer, appears to have been wanting in the fortyseventh edition of the catalogue of the museum.
This donation consisted of a part of a root of a tree,
shaped like a swine, and sometimes called 'a
lignified hog;' but the several editions of the catalogue differ considerably in the insertion or omission
of various articles. The exhibition was contained
chiefly in glass cases ranged on the tables, placed in
the front room of the first floor of the building; but
the walls also were covered with curiosities, and the
entrance passage displayed an alligator suspended
from the ceiling, with a variety of ancient and
foreign weapons hung at the sides."
Perhaps, however, the most novel and interesting
particulars which can now be given concerning
this museum may be gleaned from the "Exhibition
Catalogue" itself, which shows that it consisted
rather of strange and wonderful, than of really
valuable specimens. The title is "A Catalogue of
Rarities, to be seen at Don Salter's Coffee-house in
Chelsea; to which is added a complete list of the
donors thereof. Price 2d.
"'O Rare!'"
In the first glass were contained the model of
the holy sepulchre, and a variety of curiosities of
a similar character: such as "painted ribbands
from Jerusalem, with a pillar to which our Saviour
was tied when scourged, with a motto on each;"
"boxes of relicks from Jerusalem;" "a piece of a
saint's bone in nun's work;" several pieces of the
holy cross in a frame, glazed; a rose of Jericho;
dice of the Knights Templars; an Israelitish shekel;
and the Lord's Prayer in an ivory frame, glazed.
There were also several specimens of carving on
cherry-stones, representing the heads of the four
Evangelists and effigies of saints; with some cups
and baskets made out of the same minute materials.
The same case also contained a number of fine
coins and medals, both British and foreign, and "a
model of Governor Pitt's great diamond," which
was taken out of the sale. There were also a few
natural curiosities, as "a bone of an angel-fish; a
sea-horse; a petrified crab from China; a small
pair of horns, and several legs of guinea-deer; a
handkerchief made of the asbestus rock, which fire
cannot consume; a piece of rotten wood not to be
consumed by fire; the rattle of a rattlesnake with
twenty-seven joints; a large worm that eats into
the keels of ships in the West Indies; serpents'
tongues; the bark of a tree, which when drawn out
appears like fine lace; a salamander; a fairy's or
elf's arrow; a little skull, very curious." The most
remarkable artificial rarities contained in the second
glass were "a piece of Solomon's temple; Queen
Katherine's wedding shoes; King Charles the
Second's band which he wore in disguise; and a
piece of a coat of mail one hundred and fifty times
doubled." Of foreign productions this case contained "a Turkish almanack; a book in Chinese
characters; letters in the Malabar language; the
effigies and hand of an Egyptian mummy; fortyeight cups, one in another; and an Indian hatchet
used by them before iron was invented." The
natural curiosities included "a little whale; a giant's
tooth; a curious ball of fish-bones found near
Plymouth; Job's tears that grow on a tree, where
with they make anodyne necklaces; a nut of the
sand-box tree; several petrified plumes and olives;
a young frog in a tobacco-stopper; and a piece of
the caul of an elephant." The third glass comprised
"black and white scorpions; animals in embryo;
the worm that eats into the piles in Holland; the
tarantula; a nest of snakes; the horns of a shamway; the back-bone of a rattlesnake."
The fourth glass consisted of artificial curiosities,
and included "a nun's whip; a pair of garters from
South Carolina; a Chinese dodgin, which they
weigh their gold in; a little Sultaness; an Indian
spoon of equal weight with gold; a Chinese nun,
very curious; Dr. Durham's paper made of nettles."
The fifth glass contained "a Muscovy snuff-box,
made of an elk's hoof; a humming-bird's nest,
with two young ones in it; a starved swallow; the
head of an Egyptian; a lock of hair of a Goa
goat; belts of wampum; Indian money; the fruit
of the horn-tree."
The following curiosities were also disposed in
various parts of the coffee-room, with many others
less remarkable in their names and appearance—"King James's coronation sword; King William's
coronation sword and shoes; Henry VIII.'s coat
of mail, gloves, and spurs; Queen Elizabeth's
Prayer-book, stirrup, and strawberry dish; the
Pope's infallible candle; a set of beads, consecrated
by Clement VII., made of the bones of St. Anthony
of Padua; a piece of the royal oak; a petrified
child, or the figure of death; a curious piece of
metal, found in the ruins of Troy; a pair of Saxon
stockings; William the Conqueror's family sword;
Oliver's broad-sword; the King of Whiddaw's staff;
Bistreanier's staff; a wooden shoe, put under the
Speaker's chair in James II.'s time; the Emperor
of Morocco's tobacco pipe; a curious flea-trap;
an Indian prince's crown; a starved cat, found
between the walls of Westminster Abbey when the
east end was repaired; the jaws of a wild boar that
was starved to death by his tusks growing inward;
a frog, fifteen inches long, found in the Isle of
Dogs; the Staffordshire almanack, used when the
Danes were in England; the lance of Captain TowHow-Sham, king of the Darien Indians, with which
he killed six Spaniards, and took a tooth out of
each head, and put in his lance as a trophy of his
valour; a coffin of state for a friar's bones; a cockatrice serpent; a large snake, seventeen feet long,
taken in a pigeon-house in Sumatra—it had in its
belly fifteen fowls and five pigeons; a dolphin with
a flying-fish at his mouth; a gargulet, that Indians
used to cool their water with; a whistling arrow,
which the Indians use when they would treat of
peace; a negro boy's cap, made of a rat-skin;
Mary Queen of Scots' pin-cushion; a purse made
of a spider from Antigua; manna from Canaan; a
jaw of a skate, with 500 teeth; the mermaid fish;
the wild man of the woods; the flying bull's head;
and, last of all, a snake's skin, ten feet and a half
long—a most excellent hydrometer."
It may be added that, if we may believe Pennant,
the ex-Protector, Richard Cromwell, was one of the
regular visitors at Don Saltero's coffee-house in its
earliest days. The place was one of the exhibitions
which Benjamin Franklin went to see when working
as a journeyman printer in London; and it is on
record how that after leaving the house one day he
swam from Chelsea to Blackfriars, performing sundry
feats in the water as he went along.
At No. 5, Great Cheyne Row, an old-fashioned
red-brick house, has lived for many years Thomas
Carlyle, who has so far identified himself with this
neighbourhood as to be known to the world in
common parlance as "The Philosopher of Chelsea."
Not far from his house a new square named after
him bears witness to the fact that his worth is
known and appreciated in his new country. The
house and the habits of its tenant are thus described by a writer who calls himself "Quiz," in
the West Middlesex Advertiser:—
"The house tenanted by Carlyle has on its front
an appearance of antiquity, which would lead us to
ascribe it to the days of Queen Anne. In one of
his later pamphlets, 'Shooting Niagara,' associated
with a hit at modern brick-makers and brick-layers,
Carlyle has an allusion to the wall at the end
('head,' as he writes) of his garden, made of bricks
burnt in the reign of Henry VIII., and still quite
sound, whereas bricks of London manufacture in
our day are used up in about sixty years. This
wall was, of course, the boundary wall of the old
park or garden belonging to Chelsea Manor-house.
But this remark only comes incidentally, and we
know scarcely anything about Carlyle's house and
its belongings from himself. Other people have
reported a variety of particulars, not to be credited
without large deductions, concerning his home and
personal habits. Thus, an American divine, giving
an account of an interview he had with the Chelsea
sage, indulges in minutiæ such as the following:—'We were shown into a plainly-furnished room,
on whose walls hung a rugged portrait of Oliver
Cromwell. Presently an old man, apparently over
threescore years and ten, walked very slowly into
the room. He was attired in a long blue woollen
gown, reaching down to his feet. His grey hair
was in an uncombed mop on his head. His clear
blue eye was sharp and piercing. A bright tinge
of red was on his thin cheek, and his hand
trembled as he took our own. This most singularlooking personage reminded us of an old alchemist,
&c.' Much in the Yankee mannerism, certainly,
yet it comes as a slight retribution, that one who
has been so hard on America should be commented
on in true Yankee fashion. Others have given us
accounts of rooms in the house heaped up with
books, not at all marshalled in the regular order
we should have expected, when they belonged to
a man so fond of the drill-sergeant. One correspondent of a London paper tells us of a collection
of portraits of great men, gathered by degrees from
picture-galleries, shops, and book-stalls. As it is
rumoured, the contrivances resorted to by some of
Carlyle's admirers, at the period of life when most
of us are inclined to be enthusiastic in our likings,
with the intent of seeing the interior of his house,
or coming into personal communication with him,
have been both ingenious and ludicrous. Some
have, it is said, called at his house, and inquired
for an imaginary Jones or Smith, in the hope that
they might catch a glimpse at the interior, or see
the man himself in the background. Possibly,
there have been those who have made friends with
the 'dustmen,' so that they may glean up some
scraps of MSS. from the miscellaneous contents
of his waste-basket. I have not heard, though,
whether any one ever went so far as to assume
the garb of a policeman, to ensnare the affections
of some damsel at 5, Great Cheyne Row, and in
this way make discoveries about the philosopher's
personal habits.
"Mr. J. C. Hotten, in some notes on Carlyle,
states that 'he always walks at night, carrying an
enormous stick, and generally with his eyes on the
ground.' This is an exaggeration of the stick, and
so far from being only out at night, those accustomed to be in the streets of Chelsea know that
Carlyle has, for years past, taken a stroll in all
weathers in the morning, and in the afternoon he
is frequently to be seen wending his way towards
St. James's Park. Hence certain persons have
waylaid him in these walks from curiosity, the
Chelsea sage himself being supremely unconscious
of being watched. He has been seen to conduct a
blind man over a crossing, the person being necessarily ignorant as to who was showing him a kindness, and a little knot of human beings will touch
his sympathies, and cause him to pause. I saw
Carlyle once step up to a shop-window, around
which several individuals stood looking at something. This something was a new portrait of himself, as he quickly perceived; but before they were
awake to the fact that the original was close by,
he had moved off, giving his stick a rather contemptuous twirl."
The connection of Thomas Carlyle with Chelsea
is, at all events, of upwards of forty years' duration,
as he was a resident there in the early part of
1834; two years previously, when in London, he
visited Leigh Hunt, who at that time lived close
to Cheyne Row; and, probably, it was at that time
that he resolved to make it his fixed abode. The
two writers were neighbours here until 1840, when
Leigh Hunt removed to Kensington, which he has
immortalised under the title of the "Old Court
Suburb;" and their friendship continued until
Hunt's death.
At Chelsea, it is almost needless to add, Carlyle
wrote his history of "The French Revolution,"
"Past and Present," his "Life of John Stirling,"
"Oliver Cromwell's Letters and Speeches," and
his "Life of Frederick the Great;" in fact, nearly
all the works which have made his name famous
through the world.
His wife died at Chelsea suddenly in April, 1866,
just as she heard of the delivery of his inaugural
address as Lord Rector of Edinburgh University.
She left a work unfinished. Charles Dickens admired her literary talents very much. He writes
to his friend Forster: "It was a terrible shock to
me, and poor dear Carlyle has been in my mind
ever since. How often have I thought of the unfinished novel! No one now to finish it. None of
the writing women come near her at all." Mr.
Forster adds: "No one could doubt this who had
come within the fascinating influence of that sweet
and noble nature. With some of the highest gifts of
intellect, and the charm of a most varied knowledge
of books and things, there was something beyond.
No one who knew Mrs. Carlyle could replace her
loss when she had passed away."
On the 4th of December, 1875, Thomas Carlyle completed his eightieth year (having been born
in 1795, in the once obscure village of Ecclefechan,
in Scotland), on which occasion he received congratulations from a number of the chief litlérateurs
of Germany, and also a present of a gold medal,
struck in honour of the day, from a number of
English friends and admirers, who addressed him
as "a teacher whose genius and literary achievements have lent radiance to his time."
Sir John Goss, who was many years organist at
St. Paul's Cathedral, was for some time a resident
in Cheyne Row.
The embankment facing Cheyne Walk, extending
from Battersea Bridge, close by old Chelsea Church,
to the grounds of Chelsea Hospital, a distance of
nearly a mile, presents a pleasing contrast to the
red-bricked houses of which we have been speaking.
Although the proposition to embank the northern
shore of the Thames between Chelsea Hospital
and Battersea Bridge was first made by the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Woods and Forests
in 1839, the practical execution of the idea was
not commenced even on a small scale until some
twenty years afterwards. These works originally
formed a portion of a scheme for which the Commissioners of Woods and Forests obtained an
Act of Parliament in 1846, and which embodied
the formation of an embankment and roadway
between Vauxhall and Battersea bridges, and the
construction of a suspension bridge at Chelsea.
The funds which it was estimated would be required
were procured, but they proved insufficient for the
whole of the work, the bridge costing more than
was anticipated. A narrow embankment and roadway were therefore constructed as far as the
western end of the Chelsea Hospital gardens, where
they terminated in a cul de sac. In time, however,
the necessity arose for making a sewer to intercept
the sewage of the district west of Cremorne, and to
help it on its way to Barking. But there was no
good thoroughfare from Cremorne eastwards along
which to construct it; so it was proposed to form a
route for the sewer, and at the same time to complete an unfinished work by continuing the embankment and road on to Battersea. Application
was made to Government for the return of £38,150,
a sum which remained unexpended from the
amount originally raised for the bridge and embankment, and which would have assisted in the prosecution of the new work. The application, however,
was unsuccessful, and Sir William Tite, who from
the first took a very active interest in the matter,
appealed to the Metropolitan Board of Works to
undertake the work independently of Government
assistance. The Board, therefore, made several
applications to Parliament for an Act, which they
succeeded in obtaining in 1868. The designs for
the embankment, roadway, and sewer were at once
prepared by Mr. (afterwards Sir James) Bazalgette,
the engineer to the Board, and the whole work was
completed and opened to the public in 1874.
At its commencement by Battersea Bridge very
little land has been reclaimed from the Thames;
but one alteration is worthy of mention—the old
awkward way down to the steamboat pier under
the archway of a private house has been cleared
away, and the pontoon, moored close to the wall, is
reached by a bridge resting in an opening in the
granite. An old block of houses, too, which stood
between this spot and Chelsea Church has been
entirely removed. They formed a narrow quaintlooking old thoroughfare, called Lombard Street,
one part of which was spanned by the upper rooms
of an old house. The backs of one side of this
thoroughfare overlooked, and here and there overhung, the river; but they have all been cleared
away, and the narrow street converted into a broad
one, so that one side of it faces the river. After
passing the church the road widens out, and as the
space between the houses and the embankment
wall becomes greater, a piece of land has been laid
out as a garden, so that there are two roads, one in
front of the shops, the other between the garden
and the granite wall. This garden extends nearly
to Oakley Street, which the road rises gradually to
meet, while the path falls slightly in order to pass
under the shore end of the new Albert Bridge.
There is another pretty little piece of garden at
this part of the route. After this the reclaimed
land becomes of yet greater extent as Cheyne Row
is reached. From this spot the Embankment and
its surroundings can be seen to the best advantage. The rough hammer-dressed granite wall runs
in a straight line from here to where it meets the
old roadway formed by the Office of Woods and
Forests. In the ground beneath the pavement
have been planted trees on both sides of the road,
similar to those planted on the Victoria Embankment. But nothing adds so much to the picturesqueness of this part of the Thames-side roadway, and helps to relieve the appearance of newness
which is so marked a feature in the Victoria Embankment, as the line of old trees planted on what
was formerly the edge of the river, with the background formed by a fine old row of private houses.
The trees are now in the garden divided by a
gravel walk, which fills up the space between the
two roadways. At the end of Cheyne Walk the
Queen's Road branches off to the left, and runs
into the bottom of Lower Sloane Street. At the
junction of two roads, but where was formerly the
diverging point of one from the river-side, stood
the "Swan" tavern, famous as the goal of many
a hotly-contested aquatic race from its namesake
near London Bridge. Not far from this time
honoured inn are the Botanical Gardens of the
Society of Apothecaries.

THE BOTANICAL GARDENS, CHELSEA, 1790.

THOMAS CARLYLE.
The Albert Bridge, opposite Oakley Street, constructed upon the suspension principle, was opened
in 1873; it forms a useful communication between
Chelsea and Battersea Park. Cadogan Pier, close
to the bridge, serves as a landing-place for passengers on the river steamboats.
Near the river and Cheyne Walk was a large
mulberry-garden, one of those established in the
suburbs of London by order of James I., about the
year 1610. Thoresby, writing in 1723, tells us in
his diary that he saw "at Mr. Gate's a sample of
the satin made at Chelsea of English silkworms for
the Princess of Wales, very rich and beautiful."
But it has long disappeared, owing to the steady
progress of bricks and mortar.
As late as 1824, there was to be seen near
Chelsea Bridge a sign of "The Cricketers," painted
by George Morland. "At the above date," says
Mr. Larwood, "this painting by Morland had been
removed inside the house, and a copy of it hung up
for the sign. Unfortunately, however, the landlord
used to travel about with the original, and put it
up before his booth at Staines and Egham races,
cricket matches, and similar occasions"—all of
which removals, it may be presumed, did no great
good to it.
The "Old Swan" inn, which was the goal of
Doggett's annual rowing match, stood on the east
side of the Botanical Gardens, and was long since
turned into a brewery, and the race, down to about
the year 1873, ended at the new "Swan," higher
up the river, as mentioned above.
The "Swan," very naturally, was a favourite sign
for inns by the waterside, and Mr. J. T. Smith, in
his "Book for a Rainy Day," or rather a waterman who speaks in his pages, enumerates a goodly
list of "Swans" between London and Battersea
bridges in 1829:—"Why, let me see, master," he
writes, "there's the 'Old Swan' at London Bridge—that's one; then there's the 'Swan' in Arundel
Street—that's two; then our's here" (at Hungerford
Stairs), "three; the 'Swan' at Lambeth—that's down
though. Well, then there's the 'Old Swan' at
Chelsea, but that has been long turned into a brewhouse; though that was where our people" (the
watermen) "rowed to formerly, as mentioned in
Doggett's will; now they row to the sign of the
'New Swan' beyond the Physic Garden—we'll say
that's four. Then there's two 'Swans' at Battersea—six."
We have already spoken at some length of
Tom Doggett, the famous comedian, (fn. 6) and of the
annual rowing match by Thames watermen for the
honour of carrying off the "coat and badge,"
which, in pursuance of his will, have been competed for on the 1st of August for the last 150
years; suffice it to say, then, that in the year
1873 the old familiar "Swan" inn was demolished
to make room for the new embankment. The old
"Swan" tavern enjoyed a fair share of public
favour for many years. Pepys, in his "Diary," thus
mentions it, under date April 9, 1666:—"By
coach to Mrs. Pierce's, and with her and Knipp,
and Mrs. Pierce's boy and girl abroad, thinking to
have been merry at Chelsea; but being come
almost to the house by coach, near the waterside,
a house alone, I think the 'Swan,' a gentleman
walking by called to us to tell us that the house
was shut up because of the sickness. So we, with
great affright, turned back, being holden to the
gentleman, and went away (I, for my part, in great
disorder) to Kensington." In 1780 the house was
converted into the Swan Brewery; and the landing
of the victor in the aquatic contest thenceforth took
place, as above stated, at a house bearing the same
sign nearer to Cheyne Walk. Since the demolition of this house the race has been ended close
to the spot where the old tavern stood. This
rowing match—although not to be compared in any
way to the great annual aquatic contest between
the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge—occasions a very lively scene, the river being covered
with boats, and the utmost anxiety evinced by the
friends of the contending parties. In former times
it was customary for the winner on his arrival to be
saluted with shouts of applause by the surrounding
spectators, and carried in triumph on the shoulders
of his friends into the tavern.
On a vacant space of ground in front of the
Swan Brewery stood formerly a mansion, erected in
the reign of Queen Anne, which was for many years
inhabited by Mrs. Banks, the mother of Sir Joseph
Banks.
"The Physic Garden," to which we now come,
was originated by Sir Hans Sloane, the celebrated
physician, and was handed over in 1721 by him,
by deed of gift, to the Apothecaries' Company, who
still own and maintain it. The garden, which
bears the name of the "Royal Botanic," was presented to the above company on condition that it
"should at all times be continued as a physicgarden, for the manifestation of the power, and
wisdom, and goodness of God in creation; and
that the apprentices might learn to distinguish good
and useful plants from hurtful ones." Various additions have been made to the "Physic Garden"
at different periods, in the way of greenhouses and
hot-houses; and in the centre of the principal walk
was erected a statue of Sir Hans Sloane, by Michael
Rysbraeck.
"We visited," writes P. Wakefield in 1814, "the
'Physic or Botanic Garden,' commenced by the
Company of Apothecaries in 1673, and patronised
by Sir Hans Sloane, who granted the freehold of
the premises to the company on condition that
they should present annually to the Royal Society
specimens of fifty new plants till their number
should amount to two thousand. From a sense of
gratitude they erected in the centre of the garden
a marble statue of their benefactor. Above the
spacious greenhouse is a library, furnished with a
large collection of botanical works, and with numerous specimens of dried plants. We could not
quit these gardens without admiring two cedars of
great size and beauty."
"At the time the garden was formed," writes
the author of "London Exhibited in 1851," "it
must have stood entirely in the country, and had
every chance of the plants in it maintaining a
healthy state. Now, however, it is completely in
the town, and but for its being on the side of the
river, and lying open on that quarter, it would be
altogether surrounded with common streets and
houses. As it is, the appearance of the walls, grass,
plants, and houses is very much that of most
London gardens—dingy, smoky, and, as regards the
plants, impoverished and starved. It is, however,
interesting for its age, for the few old specimens it
contains, for the medical plants, and, especially,
because the houses are being gradually renovated,
and collections of ornamental plants, as well as those
which are useful in medicine, formed and cultivated
on the best principles, under the curatorship of
Mr. Thomas Moore, one of the editors of the
'Gardener's Magazine of Botany.'" In spite of
the disadvantages of its situation, here are still
grown very many of the drugs which figure in the
"London Pharmacopœia." The two cedars of
Lebanon, which have now reached the age of
upwards of 150 years, are said to have been presented to the garden by Sir Joseph Banks, the distinguished naturalist, who here studied the first
principles of botany. Of Sir Hans Sloane, and of
his numerous public benefactions, we have already
spoken in our account of the British Museum. (fn. 7) It
only remains, therefore, to add that he was a contributor of natural specimens of rocks, from the
Giant's Causeway, to Pope's Grotto at Twickenham;
that he attended Queen Anne in her last illness at
Kensington; and that he was the first member of
the medical profession on whom a baronetcy was
conferred.
During the last century, and early in the present,
a pleasant walk across green fields, intersected with
hedges and ditches, led the pedestrian from Westminster and Millbank to "The Old Bun House"
at Chelsea. This far-famed establishment, which
possessed a sort of rival museum to Don Saltero's,
stood at the end of Jew's Row (now Pimlico Road),
not far from Grosvenor Row. The building was a
one-storeyed structure, with a colonnade projecting
over the foot pavement, and was demolished in
1839, after having enjoyed the favour of the public
for more than a century and a half. Chelsea has
been famed for its buns since the commencement
of the last century. Swift, in his "Journal to
Stella," 1712, writes, "Pray are not the fine buns
sold here in our town as the rare Chelsea buns? I
bought one to-day in my walk," &c. It was for
many years the custom of the Royal Family, and
the nobility and gentry, to visit the Bun-house in
the morning. George II., Queen Caroline, and the
princesses frequently honoured the proprietor, Mrs.
Hand, with their company, as did also George III.
and Queen Charlotte; and her Majesty presented
Mrs. Hand with a silver half-gallon mug, with five
guineas in it. On Good Friday mornings the Bunhouse used to present a scene of great bustle—upwards of 50,000 persons have assembled here,
when disturbances often arose among the London
mob; and in one day more than £250 have been
taken for buns.
The following curious notice was issued on Wednesday, March 27th, 1793:—"Royal Bun House,
Chelsea, Good Friday.—No Cross Buns. Mrs.
Hand respectfully informs her friends and the
public, that in consequence of the great concourse
of people which assembled before her house at a
very early hour, on the morning of Good Friday
last, by which her neighbours (with whom she has
always lived in friendship and repute) have been
much alarmed and annoyed; it having also been
intimated, that to encourage or countenance a
tumultuous assembly at this particular period might
be attended with consequences more serious than
have hitherto been apprehended; desirous, therefore, of testifying her regard and obedience to
those laws by which she is happily protected, she
is determined, though much to her loss, not to sell
Cross Buns on that day to any person whatever,
but Chelsea buns as usual."
The Bun-house was much frequented during the
palmy days of Ranelagh, after the closing of which
the bun trade declined. Notwithstanding this, on
Good Friday, April 18th, 1839, upwards of 24,000
buns were sold here. Soon after, the Bun-house
was sold and pulled down; and at the same time
was dispersed a collection of pictures, models,
grotesque figures, and modern antiques, which had
for a century added the attractions of a museum to
the bun celebrity. Another bun-house was built
in its place, but the olden charm of the place had
fled, and Chelsea buns are now only matters of
history.
Sir Richard Phillips, in his "Morning's Walk
from London to Kew," a few years before the
demolition of the old Bun-house, after describing
his ramble through Pimlico, writes: "I soon turned
the corner of a street which took me out of sight
of the space on which once stood the gay Ranelagh.
… Before me appeared the shop so famed for
Chelsea buns, which for above thirty years I have
never passed without filling my pockets. In the
original of these shops—for even of Chelsea buns
there are counterfeits—are preserved mementoes of
domestic events in the first half of the past century.
The bottle-conjuror is exhibited in a toy of his
own age; portraits are also displayed of Duke
William and other noted personages; a model of a
British soldier, in the stiff costume of the same age;
and some grotto-works, serve to indicate the taste
of a former owner, and were, perhaps, intended to
rival the neighbouring exhibition at Don Saltero's.
These buns have afforded a competency, and even
wealth, to four generations of the same family;
and it is singular that their delicate flavour, lightness, and richness, have never been successfully
imitated."
In the Mirror for April 6, 1839, are two views
of the old Bun-house, which were taken just before
its demolition.
Chelsea would seem at one time to have enjoyed
a reputation not only for buns, but for custards, if
we may judge from the following allusion to them
by Gay, in his "Trivia:"—
"When W—and G—, mighty names, are dead,
Or but at Chelsea under custards read."