THE HUNDRED OF HOLDSHOT
containing the parishes of; Eversley; Hartley Wespall; Heckfield; Silchester; Stratfield Mortimer (Part of) Mortimer West End Tithing; Stratfieldsaye; Stratfield Turgis
This list represents the extent of the hundred of Holdshot at the
time of the Population Returns of 1831. Between 1831 and 1841 North
Waltham and Woodmancott were added to the hundred, (fn. 1) and in 1894 the
parishes of Mattingley and Mortimer West End were formed out of the parishes
of Heckfield and Stratfield Mortimer respectively.
At the time of the Domesday Survey the hundred comprised Hartley
Wespall, Silchester, Stratfieldsaye, and Stratfield Turgis,
the tithing of Minley in the
parish of Yateley, the tithing
of Mattingley in the parish
of Heckfield, and the greater
part of the parish of Eversley. (fn. 2)

Index map to the hundred of Holdshot
At this period the total
assessment of the hundred was
30 hides, showing a decrease
of 12 on the assessment of
the hundred made before the
Conquest. Great Bramshill
in Eversley and the rest of
Heckfield were in Bosmere
Hundred, (fn. 3) while the Hampshire portion of Stratfield Mortimer was entered
under Bountisborough Hundred. (fn. 4) By the 14th century the hundred had
assumed its modern dimensions, (fn. 5) the only exception being that it still included
the tithing of Minley. (fn. 6) In 1639 a witness in an Exchequer suit deposed that
the tithing of Minley and the lands belonging to the farm of Minley lay
within the hundred of Holdshot; (fn. 7) and another stated that 'he knew that
for his time there had been a tithingman continued for the tithing of Minley
as a distinct tithing from the tithings of Hawley and Yateley, that such
tithingman was always elected at his majesty's court for the hundred of
Holdshot and usually took up all waives and estrays and other royalties
happening within the tithing of Minley as lying within his majesty's hundred
of Holdshot, and that the tithingman of Minley was sometimes amerced at
the said court for not appearing there.' (fn. 8) By 1831, however, Minley was
reckoned as part of Yateley, and was therefore returned with the hundred of
Crondall. (fn. 9)
Until 1228 the hundred of Holdshot was one of the five out-hundreds
belonging to the royal manor of Basingstoke. (fn. 10) Its separation is indicated by
the wording of the charter of Henry III, which in that year granted only
the manor of Basingstoke with the in-hundred to the good men of the town
of Basingstoke at a fee-farm rent. (fn. 11) Holdshot being a royal hundred came
under the Parliamentary Survey of the Crown property in the time of the
Commonwealth. From this survey it appears that the courts leet and lawday
for the hundred were held under a certain oak called 'The Hundred Oak' in
Heckfield at Michaelmas and Hocktide. (fn. 12)
Footnotes
| 1 |
Cf. Pop. Ret. of 1831 and 1841. |
| 2 |
V.C.H. Hants, i, 472b, 483b, 490b, 492a, 495b, 496a, 503b, 505a. |
| 3 |
Ibid. 483b. |
| 4 |
Ibid. 491a. |
| 5 |
Feud. Aids, ii, 313, 331. |
| 6 |
Vide Exch. Lay Subs. R. Hants, bdle. 175, no. 490. |
| 7 |
Exch. Dep. Hil. 14 & 15 Chas. I, 13. |
| 8 |
Exch. Dep. Hil. 14 & 15 Chas. I, 13. |
| 9 |
Pop. Ret. of 1831. |
| 10 |
Hund. R. (Rec. Com.), ii, 220. |
| 11 |
Baigent and Millard, Hist, of Basingstoke, 236. |
| 12 |
Parl. Surv. Hants, no. 6. |