COTTISFORD
This parish (fn. 1) lies about six miles north of Bicester and
four miles south of Brackley in the north-eastern
corner of Oxfordshire, which is enclosed by Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire. (fn. 2) In the 19th
century it covered 1,506 acres of which 438 were
part of 634 acres of 'intermixed lands' shared with
Hethe. In 1932 the whole of these lands was awarded
to Cottisford, increasing its area to 1,702 acres. (fn. 3) The
parish boundaries form an irregular parallelogram,
tipped from north-west to south-east. Its southern
boundary separating it from Hethe, Hardwick, and
Tusmore is noticeably artificial and must have been
drawn after the fields had been laid out: Cottisford's
history has been closely connected with these parishes
from early times. The Northamptonshire border
bounds it on the north-west. The parish forms a
part of the Great Oolite belt (covered by fine drift
gravel in the south) and lies mostly at 400 feet above
sea-level; its soil is gravelly, with a stone subsoil. (fn. 4)
Much of the land was once heath, particularly on
Cottisford Heath in the north and Hardwick Heath
in the south. (fn. 5)
Apart from the Oxford-Brackley road which partly
bounds it on the north-west the parish has no main
roads. Minor roads connect the village of Cottisford
with the Buckingham-Deddington road to the north,
the Bicester-Buckingham road to the south-east, and
the Oxford-Brackley road to the west. This last is
described in a 13th-century deed as 'the royal way
leading from Oxford to Brackele', while the first
appears as the 'way leading from Cotesford to
Brackele'. (fn. 6) The road west from the village was
described in 1358, when its course was changed, as
'a way leading from Coteford to Sulthorn' (i.e.
Souldern). (fn. 7)
The village of Cottisford lies towards the southeast on the banks of the Crowell stream, where there
was once a ford: hence the name Cotts-ford. In early
13th-century charters it is named 'Wolfheysford' or
'Urlfesford'. (fn. 8) The village was described by Peshall
in the 18th century as 'lying in the form of a street
from e(ast) to w(est)', and this layout is shown in
Davis's map of 1797. (fn. 9) The church and manor-house
(now Cottisford House) are depicted lying, as they
do today, north of the road, but divided by a lane
running north and south with a number of cottages
standing to the north of both. Both lane and houses
to the north have now gone as the result of alterations
in the line of the roads made in the late 1820's by
William Turner, the tenant of Cottisford House,
when he was laying out pleasure-grounds. At the
same time he pulled down all the houses which stood
round the church and planted the site with the trees
still growing there. (fn. 10) The incumbent's return of 1831
notes that 'the village once stood round the church
and that the cottages are now removed to a distance'. (fn. 11)
A drawing of 1825 of the church from the south-east
shows cottages lying west of the church, (fn. 12) and
Blomfield records that the churchyard was closed in
by cottages on three sides. (fn. 13) He adds that the road
which Turner stopped used to continue in a southerly
direction towards Hethe and that traces of it could be
seen in dry weather in the field in front of the Rectory.
If this was so Davis did not show it on his map.
Blomfield's further statement that Turner substituted an east to west road for the old north to south
one seems clearly an exaggeration. (fn. 14) What Turner
evidently did was to build new cottages to replace
those he had pulled down along the already existing
village street.
The old village lay mainly west of the ford. Here
is the Rectory and College Farm (formerly Manor
Farm), a stone 18th-century house of two low stories
facing on to the road. East of the stream, now crossed
by the road, is Manor Farm, a medieval house.
Numerous fishponds to the south are shown on the
Ordnance Survey map of 1881. Opposite, on the
north of the village street, was the village pond and
stocks. (fn. 15) In the 17th century the hearth-tax returns
of 1665 show that besides the Rectory, with 4 hearths,
there were 2 substantial houses with 6 and 7 hearths. (fn. 16)
There was some expansion in the 18th century and
the first half of the 19th century. In 1738 twelve
cottages, a farm-house, and a gentleman's house (i.e.
Cottisford House) were recorded. (fn. 17) In the 19th century the comparatively new hamlet in the north-west
of the parish at Juniper Hill developed, and Cottisford itself spread up the hill to the east. (fn. 18) The
village school was built there in 1856, (fn. 19) and on the
road to Hethe to the south there is a row of six semidetached model 19th-century cottages. Farther south
still is another row of early 19th-century ones. The
water-tower near the school is of unknown origin,
but must belong to this period. In 1868 Cottisford's
cottages were described as 'very bad to very good'
and some were said to be 'not fit for human habitation'. (fn. 20) Six semi-detached council houses have been
built since 1946. (fn. 21)
The village has two houses of considerable interest. One is Manor Farm, possibly the De Cotesfords', (fn. 22) which used to be assigned to the 13th
century, but is now considered to be a 'very doubtful
example of the period'. (fn. 23) It more probably dates
from the 14th century. The house, composed of uncoursed rubble, consists of an oblong block lying
north-south, subdivided into two compartments,
probably a first-floor hall and a solar, with two
smaller blocks of unequal size projecting from the
west wall, with a lean-to between them. There is also
a later south wing added when the original building
was remodelled in the 16th century. Most of the
windows have been modernized, except two in the
north wall of the solar, each of one trefoil-headed
light, which were probably inserted in the 15th century. In the north gable above is a two-light attic
window of c. 1200, but this does not appear to be in
its original position. The most interesting part of the
house is the north-west projection, which contains
what was probably a garde-robe opening from the
solar. Within there is a projecting semicircular stone
trough with a drain. Above the gable rises an octagonal chimney shaft, which has been assigned to the
14th century, but which may be of later date. Sixteenth-century roof timbers can be seen in the north
gable; the roof is of Welsh slate. The interior has
been much modernized, but the fittings include a
16th-century fireplace in a ground-floor room. In the
early 18th century the farm-house was leased by the
Fermors to William Topping for £51 10s. (fn. 24) Its
farmer tenant and economy in the 1880's have been
described in Flora Thompson's Lark Rise. The
house was owned by the Ramsays until 1857, when
it was bought by Lord Effingham. (fn. 25) It changed hands
again in 1898 and in 1944 when Col. M. L. Mostyn
purchased it. It is now leased to Twyford Mills Ltd.
and used as a hostel for their apprentices. (fn. 26)
As Cottisford manor between 1100 and 1885 was
first in the hands of Bec Abbey and later in those of
Eton College, there was no resident lord of the
manor. (fn. 27) The abbey's lands were administered by
the Prior of Ogbourne (Wilts.), who had a bailiff at
Cottisford. There was a grange there at least as early
as 1306. (fn. 28) An indenture of 1325 gives details of what
was evidently a substantial building: a hall, chamber,
kitchen, and granary. There was a close and garden
attached, a fishery worth 1s. and a dovecote worth
3s. (fn. 29) When the property passed to Eton in the middle
of the 15th century, the college's lessee probably took
over the house.
At the end of the 16th century or at latest before
1606 the college built a new house for its tenants,
which is variously designated the manor-house or
the mansion house. (fn. 30) About a century later, the
tenant Laurence Lord, junior, built another house,
described in the renewal of his lease in 1707 as a 'good
house'. (fn. 31) This house, now called Cottisford House,
is built of coursed rubble with ashlar quoins; it is of
two stories with attic dormers in a hipped roof. The
south front has a doorway with a broken pediment
and a modillioned eaves-cornice. Early 19th-century
alterations and additions were made by William
Turner, who obtained the lease in 1825, (fn. 32) and the
house has since been well restored. In the garden, to
the north-east, are the remains of a large brick dovecote, which was mentioned when the estate was sold
in 1773. It was square and is now roofless.
It has been stated that Cottisford House was on
the site of Barsis Place, which was once the home of
the De Bar family. (fn. 33) The house was let by Ogbourne
in 1375 and 1400 to Edward Metteley; it later came
into the possession of the Copes of Hanwell, who
sold it in 1620 to Eton College. (fn. 34)
The parish has long been noted as good hunting
country, and there is a fine painting by Ben Marshall
(1767 ?–1835) (fn. 35) of Mr. Fermor's hounds on Cottisford Heath. Annual horse-races were held there at
the close of the hunting season in the early part of the
19th century. (fn. 36)
The parish has had interesting associations. The
priors of Ogbourne who acted as agents for the
Norman Abbey of Bec, the lord of the manor, were
frequent visitors to their grange in the village, and so
were the priors of Goldcliff (Mon.) and Steventon
(Berks.). After the manor had passed to Eton College
several Oxfordshire families of lesser gentry were
lessees or freeholders, notably the Samwells, Ardens,
and Pettys. (fn. 37) In the 18th century the Eyres were another resident family of note. James Eyre (1734–99)
was Recorder of London and finally Chief Justice of
the Common Pleas. The Copes of Hanwell and the
important Roman Catholic family of Fermor were
also landowners in the 17th and 18th centuries,
though never resident. (fn. 38) Sir Henry Savile, Provost of
Eton, appears to have taken a particular interest in
the college estate and much correspondence between
him and Sir Anthony Cope (1548 ?–1615) of Hanwell
has survived. (fn. 39) Robert Petty, Anthony Wood's
grandfather, and also his nephew Maximilian were
Eton College's tenants. (fn. 40) Charnell Petty of Tetsworth and later of Stoke Lyne was the lessee of Barsis
Place. (fn. 41)
A memorable 19th-century resident was Flora
Thompson, the daughter of a stonemason of Juniper
Hill and the author of Lark Rise (1939) and its sequels,
Over to Candleford (1941) and Candleford Green
(1943). She was born in the hamlet in 1877 and educated at Cottisford village school. Her books are important social documents for life at Juniper ('Lark Rise')
and Cottisford ('Fordlow') in the 19th century. (fn. 42)
In the 20th century Air Chief Marshal Sir Robert
Brooke-Popham, who so much influenced the formative years of the R.A.F., resided at Cottisford House
for some years before his death in 1953. (fn. 43)
Juniper Hill, the hamlet in the north-west of the
parish, dates from the second half of the 18th century
and mainly developed in the 19th century. The name
is derived from the prevalence on the surrounding
heath in the past of the common juniper shrub. (fn. 44)
Two cottages were built there in 1754, but the hamlet
mainly developed after the inclosure of the common
fields in 1854. By the end of the 19th century there
were about 30 cottages, mostly built on lands ceded
as 'squatters' rights'. (fn. 45) Its inn, the 'Fox', came into
existence between 1852 and 1864 and figures in Flora
Thompson's Lark Rise as 'The Waggon and Horses'.
There are a number of outlying farm-houses in the
parish: the Warren, which was a 17th-century house
built for the warrener and used in the early 19th
century as a hunting-box by Sir Edward Lloyd, Bt., (fn. 46)
has recently been pulled down; Heath Farm, Glebe
Farm, and Coneygre Farm are 19th-century buildings, probably erected after the inclosure in 1854.
The 'Conygree' Farm mentioned in 17th-century
records was in the village.
Manor.
In 1086 COTTISFORD, assessed at
6 hides, was held of Hugh de Grantmesnil by Roger
d'Ivry, (fn. 47) who had married Hugh's eldest daughter
Adeline. He died in exile a few years later, having
forfeited his English lands. (fn. 48) Adeline, who survived
until about 1110, (fn. 49) gave Cottisford to Bec Abbey in
Normandy. (fn. 50) Later evidence shows that her grant
included all the land of the township with the exception of two small estates. One of these was held
by Adeline's sister Rohais, wife of Robert de Courcy,
the son of Richard de Courcy and an important
landowner in Oxfordshire. In about 1125, with
Robert's consent, she gave it to Bec. (fn. 51) The other,
a hide of land, had been given before 1081 by Hugh
de Grantmesnil with Cottisford church to St. Évroul
Abbey in Normandy, (fn. 52) but in 1167 this too was
acquired by Bec. (fn. 53) Many of Bec's English manors,
including Cottisford, were administered from its
cell at Greater Ogbourne (Wilts.), (fn. 54) and it became
customary to regard the Prior of Ogbourne, the
effective administrator of Cottisford, as the lord of
the manor. (fn. 55)
It has been conjectured that there was a second
manor in Cottisford, held in the second half of the
14th century by Sir Roger de Cotesford. (fn. 56) Thirteenth-century records, however, show that there
was only one manor, the whole of which was held
by Bec. (fn. 57) The surname 'De Cotesford' was borne,
though not consistently, by a number of families
living in the parish from the late 12th century onwards, who were tenants of the abbey and not lords
of the manor. (fn. 58) In 1279 Bec held 'Manerium de
Coteford cum tota villata'. (fn. 59)
The last Prior of Ogbourne to hold Cottisford was
William de St. Vaast, nominated in 1364. (fn. 60) In 1404
Ogbourne, an alien priory, with its manors was
granted by Henry IV to his son John, later Duke of
Bedford, Thomas Langley, later Bishop of Durham,
and William de St. Vaast for the duration of the war
with France. (fn. 61) The prior died soon afterwards and by
1422 Thomas Langley had surrendered his rights to
the Duke of Bedford, who continued to farm the
manors of the priory, which had been suppressed in
1414. (fn. 62) The duke died in 1435 and in 1438 Henry VI
granted Cottisford to his uncle Humphrey, Duke of
Gloucester. (fn. 63) In 1441, however, the king gave Cottisford to his new foundation of Eton College. (fn. 64)
Edward IV confirmed his predecessor's grant in
1462. (fn. 65)
In the late 14th century the Prior of Ogbourne had
adopted the practice of leasing Cottisford manor.
Edward Metteley, who held a lease of land (fn. 66) in
Cottisford as early as 1375, obtained a lease of the
manor for nine years in 1391. (fn. 67) This was renewed in
1400, for the lives of himself and his wife Margaret. (fn. 68)
Eton College continued the practice, and its leaseholders came to be termed lords of the manor. In
1450 the estate was leased to Robert Arden for a
term of 20 years and in 1469 for 60 years to John
Samwell. He was apparently Arden's brother-in-law
and the bailiff of Cottisford and Fringford (where
Eton also owned a small property). John Samwell
died before 1505, since from that year until 1512 his
son Roger paid rent to the college. Roger Samwell's
widow Eleanor was the leaseholder in 1513–14, and
her second husband Thomas Danvers of Banbury
paid the rent from 1515 to 1521. (fn. 69) Thomas and
Eleanor Danvers then quitclaimed their rights in
the manor of Cottisford, and in 1522 the lease returned to the Arden family in the person of John
Arden (d. 1535), grandson of Robert Arden. In 1542
the leaseholder was his son, John Arden (d. 1556),
who in his turn was succeeded by his son, a third
John Arden, who obtained a renewal of the lease.
Some time after 1570 Arden sold the remainder of
his lease to (Sir) Thomas Ridley, who became headmaster of Eton in 1580 and to whom the college
granted a new lease for 21 years in 1587. (fn. 70) In the
following year, however, the manor was leased by
the college to Robert Calcot of Byfield (Northants),
to hold for the lives in survivorship of John and
James Arden, sons of John Arden, and of John Calcot
his own son. (fn. 71) Calcot was dead by 1606, and in that
year a lease of 21 years was granted to Robert Wilcox
of Hilmorton (Warws.). (fn. 72) The next leaseholder was
Richard Stephens, who was tenant from 1627 to
1641, (fn. 73) when George Austin of Coleman Street,
London, became the lessee. (fn. 74) Austin devised the
lease to his wife Frideswide, who married as her
second husband Valentine Walton of Great Stoughton and Somersharn (Hunts.). In 1650 he sub-let
to John Hart of Chilton (Bucks.), for nine years
from 1651. Walton and his wife surrendered the
lease of the manor to Eton in 1658, (fn. 75) and Hart
obtained a lease in 1660 for the customary 21 years. (fn. 76)
In 1664 Hart's widow married Edward Andrews of
Lathbury (Bucks.), and they obtained a new lease in
1671. (fn. 77) In 1675 Andrews surrendered his rights and
those of his wife in Cottisford to Laurence Lord of
Fritwell, who received a new lease in 1676: (fn. 78) he died
at Fritwell in 1708. His eldest son Laurence resided
at Cottisford during his father's lifetime, and continued renewals of the lease of the manor until 1731.
He died in 1743.
In 1739 the manor was leased to Richard Eyre, who
was 'a power in the village life, and even after his
death it was long before he was forgotten'. (fn. 79) He was
a son of the Revd. Richard Eyre, Prebendary of
Salisbury, undoubtedly a member of a younger
branch of the well-known Wiltshire family, and had
spent 28 years in the East India Company's service. (fn. 80)
His lease was renewed in 1752 for 20 years, (fn. 81) but in
1760, the year before his death, a lease of 20 years
was granted to Thomas Berney Bramston of the
Middle Temple and Skreens (Essex), and Sir James
Eyre (1734–99) of Gray's Inn. (fn. 82) James Eyre, a Chief
Justice of the Common Pleas, was a nephew of
Richard Eyre, being the son of his elder brother
Thomas, also a Prebendary of Salisbury. (fn. 83) Bramston's
and Eyre's lease was renewed in 1766 for 20 years. (fn. 84)
But Richard Eyre's widow, Martha, daughter of
Christopher Clitherow of Boston House, Brentford,
continued to live at Cottisford until her death in
1772, and in 1773 the lease was sold by auction by
order of her executors. (fn. 85)
The Cottisford lease was bought for £7,300 by the
Revd. John Russell Greenhill, the Rector of Fringford (d. 1813). He was succeeded by his son, Robert
Russell Greenhill, M.P., of Lincoln's Inn, (fn. 86) who
held the estate until 1825, when William Turner, a
member of the Irish bar, obtained a lease from Eton
College for 17 years and renewed in 1829 for 20
years. (fn. 87) Turner, however, became involved in money
difficulties, sold the remainder of his lease, and went
abroad. (fn. 88) In 1836 Eton leased the manor to Susanna
Ingram of Warminster, widow of Christopher Ingram
of Stapleford (Wilts.). (fn. 89) The lease was transferred in
1842 to James Edwards Rousby. (fn. 90) Rousby died in
1848, and in 1850 Eton granted a lease to his son
Edwards Rousby and John Kendall of Towton
Hall, near Tadcaster, his executors. (fn. 91) Edwards
Rousby died in 1875, and his son Edwards Richard
Kendal Rousby succeeded to the lease. In 1885 he
bought from Eton College the manor-house and
Warren farm. He was succeeded by his son, F. R.
Rousby, who later sold his family property to Sir
Robert Brooke-Popham. (fn. 92) The rest of the college's
estate was sold in 1921 and 1922. (fn. 93)
Lesser Estates
In the early 13th century
a hide in Cottisford belonged to the abbey of St.
Pierre-sur-Dives (Calvados), which had enfeoffed
William le Bar. (fn. 94) William gave his houses and at
least two virgates to Biddlesden Abbey (Bucks.), (fn. 95)
and in 1232 leased another virgate to Bec. (fn. 96) In 1237
St. Pierre granted Biddlesden William's whole estate,
with his homage and service. (fn. 97) William's son Ralph
had succeeded him as Biddlesden's tenant of the
hide by 1247. (fn. 98) Some time after 1266 (fn. 99) Biddlesden
quitclaimed Ralph's estate to Bec for 13½ marks, (fn. 100)
and in 1279 (fn. 101) and in 1289 Ralph was holding the hide
of Bec for a rent of 13s. 5d. a year. (fn. 102) A Robert le Bar,
perhaps his son, occurs in 1282 and 1295, (fn. 103) and a
John le Bar in 1310 and 1345. (fn. 104) The last contributed
to the tax of 1327 for his Cottisford lands. (fn. 105)
The Arden family held a freehold estate of 4 yardlands in the 16th century, which appears to have
been once Bar's holding. (fn. 106) It probably descended in
the family with its leasehold property from the reign
of Henry VIII until the end of the 16th century. (fn. 107) It
was doubtless this 4 yardlands which was leased in
1619 with Barsis Place to Charnell Petty of Tetsworth. (fn. 108)
Another freehold estate of 6 yardlands, held by
John Samwell, was sold to the Fermors of Somerton
in 1527 and was later conveyed to John Arden, (fn. 109)
but Thomas Fermor (d. 1580), lord of Hardwick
manor, had pasture rights and an estate in Cottisford
after this sale. (fn. 110) The Arden estate was purchased by
Sir Anthony Cope of Hanwell in or before 1606. (fn. 111) An
estate of 360 acres was held by Sir Humphrey Ferrers
in the 16th century, for which it was said 'he acknowledgeth nothing but to the king'. (fn. 112) Ferrers was lord
of Hethe and there can be little doubt that this
estate followed the descent of that manor. Both
were bought by Sir Rowland Lytton and sold to
Sir Anthony Cope before 1606. (fn. 113) It is possible that
when the Copes alienated Hethe manor some time
after 1637, the Cottisford estate was acquired by the
Fermors. At all events the family, then established
at Tusmore, was holding 23 yardlands in Cottisford
by the early 18th century. (fn. 114) The Fermor estate
followed the descent of Tusmore from at least 1717
until 1857, when it was sold to the Earl of Effingham. (fn. 115)
After inclosure the estate covered 616 statute acres. (fn. 116)
Between 1898 and 1920 it was split up and sold. (fn. 117)
Although the Fermor estate covered nearly half the
parish and their farm-house was called Manor Farm
there is no other evidence for the existence of a
second manor in Cottisford. It is probable that from
early times much of Cottisford's land had always
beenattached to Hethe manor or to Hardwick, where
the Ardens were lords of the manor in the 15th
century, and the Fermors in the 16th century. Herein probably lies the explanation of the 635 acres of
'intermixed lands' of which 196 acres were shared
with Hethe.
Economic and Social History. (fn. 118)
A clue
to the character of Cottisford's land is given by its field
names, first recorded in the early 13th century. Heath
and fen predominate. For instance, there is Widemor,
Mareweye, Nordmoresende, Nordesorteheth, Cotesthorn, Blakelond (used elsewhere in this part of
Oxfordshire of poor soil), and Eylesbrech. La Brueria
presumably refers to the area later known as Cottisford Heath. (fn. 119)
Domesday Book states that there was land for 10
ploughs: in demesne there were 3 plough-teams, but
land for four. The 10 villeins (villani) and 5 bordars
presumably shared some plough-teams, though no
figure is stated. Forty acres of pasture are recorded.
The value of the estate had risen steeply from £5 to
£8 since 1066. (fn. 120)
By the end of the 12th century, if not earlier, the
parent village must have thrown off a colony at
Cotes—'apud Cotes in parochia de Cotesford' (fn. 121) —
possibly on the east side of the Crowell Brook, for
there are several references in the records to its land
and to a family of De Cotes. A William de Cotes, for
example, was granted ½ hide of land in Cotes between
1194 and 1197, (fn. 122) and in 1279 the Abbot of Bec was
said to hold 3 virgates there. (fn. 123) The early 14th-century bailiffs' accounts also mention separate meadow
in Cote and 'Cotefeld'. (fn. 124)
During the 13th century there were many other
developments. Progress on the abbey's manor is
recorded in a custumal of about 1245 (fn. 125) and in the
Hundred Rolls survey of 1279. (fn. 126) In both records
the number of customary virgaters and half-virgaters
is 13 and 2 respectively, but in 1279 one cottar instead of 5 is recorded. (fn. 127) A category of tenant unknown
to the Domesday account appears at both dates:
there were 5 free tenants. One, William le Bar, was
a member of a family which was to be of local importance for some generations. Before 1232 he had
granted land (29 a.), houses, and pasture for 240
sheep to Biddlesden Abbey. (fn. 128) Another was Roger
le Blunt (or Blundus), who in 1226 had granted the
abbey over 5 virgates of land. (fn. 129) His son John in 1279
held 4 virgates of the abbey by the service of holding
the court twice a year. The usual practice on Ogbourne's manors was for the prior, or his steward, or
an itinerant bailiff to go the rounds of the manors,
holding courts after Easter and again after Martinmas. (fn. 130) In 1245 all the free tenants had held of the
abbot, but by 1279 only three were doing so or four
including Richard Poure, whose position is uncertain; the abbot was himself a sub-tenant for half
a virgate. At least 48 virgates were under cultivation
compared with 40 (land for 10 ploughs) in 1086.
The Cottisford virgate was 20 field acres, (fn. 131) so at least
1,060 field acres or perhaps about 700 statute acres
were being cultivated. Actually as the Hundred Rolls
account appears to be incomplete the extent was
probably greater.
According to the custumal of 1245 the virgater
owed a rent of 5s. and a number of works in addition.
He must plough an acre at the feast of St. Martin for
'garsherth', whether with his own plough or another's. He must also plough an acre for 'cherset'.
At the spring sowing, he had to do a day's harrowing
and a day's weeding; he had to mow the lord's
meadow, lift and cart the hay. Between Lammas and
Michaelmas he had to find a man for whatever work
the lord needed. For the great boon-works of the
lord he had to appear with his whole family and for
three precariae he had to find two men. Usually food
was provided and on one day hay for his horse.
When he mowed he was allowed to take bundles of
hay, i.e. as much as he could lift on the handle (manubrium) of the scythe. The half-virgater's services
differed slightly: in particular if need arose he had
to drive sheep, oxen, or other animals.
The smith's virgate was held on rather different
terms. He paid 2s. and had to make the iron of three
ploughs. He had to plough at 'garsherth' and find
a man for the four autumn boon-works. (fn. 132) With the
exception of four out of the six free tenants, all had to
obtain licence to marry their daughters and to sell an
ox or stallion of their own breeding. They had to pay
all 'gifts' and common aids, give their best beast as
a heriot, and if they died intestate all their chattels
were to be at the disposition of the lord. For anything sold within the manor they had to pay toll; if
they brewed for sale they must give ale money or a
penny for tolsextarium. (fn. 133)
Some additional customs have been preserved
on the early court rolls. (fn. 134) The abbot's tallage was
regularly 20s. Fines were levied for leave to contract marriage with a widow, and for leave to give
a daughter in marriage.
A series of account rolls beginning with an incomplete Pipe Roll of 1288–9 provide details of the
manor's economy. (fn. 135) This account was audited by the
prior's steward at Cottisford on 7 October 1289, and
the court was held on the following day. Total receipts amounted to over £29. (fn. 136) By far the largest
items were those resulting from the sheep flock: e.g.
£19 18s. 8½d. was received for wool and skins. A
fairly full corn account shows that the yield was over
34 qrs. of wheat, 70 qrs. of rye, 51½ of dredge, and 50
of oats. (fn. 137) Nearly all this was consumed on the manor
by the famuli and their animals or used for seed. (fn. 138)
An account roll of 1292 (fn. 139) shows that at the end of
the year the animal stock consisted of 12 horses, 14
oxen, 13 other cattle, 68 pigs, 865 sheep and lambs,
and 19 'busch'. £19 16s. was received for 73 stones
of wool at 5s. 6d. a qr. and £6 16s. for other wool.
Small quantities of cheese and butter, 22 qrs. of
wheat, 15 qrs. of dredge, and 6 bus. of lentils were
sold. The bailiff was resident at the grange and
the famuli consisted of a carter, a miller, a reaper,
3 shepherds, a cowman and pigkeeper, 3 ploughleaders, 3 ploughmen, a dairymaid, a woman who
collected herbage for the oxen and cows and harvested in autumn, a miller's boy, a boy to watch the
animals in autumn, and a boy to help the shepherd.
Among the payments made were £37 to the lord,
35s. 2d. to the king for the 15th, (fn. 140) and 3s. as a gift to
the assessor of taxes.
In common with other Bec manors, (fn. 141) Cottisford
manor had a separate bailiff or reeve, who was
resident at the grange. Extents of 1294 and 1324
complete the evidence for the economy of the manor
in this period. Cottisford, it has been said, was
primarily an arable manor, with very light labour
services. (fn. 142) The arable acres in 1294, not including
the fallow, amounted to 128, of which 126 were
sown. (fn. 143) In 1324 the arable had increased to 150 acres,
of which 80 were separate and 70 were in the common
fields. The latter were worth 1d. an acre—half the
value of the separate arable. Sixty more commonfield acres were fallow and of no value to the lord.
There were 12 acres of meadow compared with 5 in
1294. (fn. 144)
In January 1325 the farm goods and stock consisted of over 22 qrs. of wheat at 5s. a qr., over 13 qrs.
of rye at 3s. 4d. a qr., 60 qrs. of dredge at 2s. a qr.,
10 qrs. of oats at 20d. a qr., 7 qrs. of mixed pease and
vetches at 2s. a qr. There were 2 cart-horses (value
5s. each), 3 farm horses (value 4s. each), 6 oxen (value
6s. 8d. a head), 529 sheep, of which 194 were ewes
and 140 two-year-old sheep (price 12d. to 1s. 2d. a
head), and 21 head of poultry at 1½d. to 3d. a head. (fn. 145)
The prosperity of Cottisford was at its height at
the end of the 13th century. In 1292 a flock of 765
sheep was recorded, (fn. 146) a figure never approached in
the 14th century. A decline set in during the reign
of Edward II, when part of the manor may have been
let. (fn. 147) The number of famuli in 1318–19 was eleven
with a 'repe-reeve' and a clerk for the accounts in
the autumn, but in 1319–21 there were only eight
famuli. (fn. 148) The decreased activity on the manor in the
early 14th century is particularly noticeable in the
smaller numbers of sheep kept. The flock, as far as
the surviving accounts record, generally varied
between 400 and 500 sheep. (fn. 149) It may be noted that
the death-rate among them was often high: in 1321
more than half the lambs died. For the shearing and
washing of the 260 to 370 sheep an extra boy was
taken on. The wool was sold to merchants, who
came to Cottisford to inspect it, and it was then
carried to Bledlow (Bucks.), Henley, or Ruislip
(Mdx.). (fn. 150)
Precise details about the customary services in the
early 14th century are lacking. The bailiff stated: 'of
the ploughings and works … all the ploughings
were used in cultivating the lord's land. And the
works were expended in the lord's services within
the court and outside it, by tallies between the reeve
and the customary tenants.' The tenants still performed some weeding and mowing services in
addition to ploughing and harvest boons; in 1344–5
they were responsible for about 21 per cent. of the
harvest work. (fn. 151) In 1324 the works of 13 villeins had
been worth £3 6s. 7½d. and the autumn works of
3 cottars 1s. 1½d. (fn. 152)
There is little evidence for the topography of the
fields beyond the fact that there were an East and
a West Field in the early Middle Ages. Early 13thcentury charters show that land was then equally
divided between the two fields, (fn. 153) and the bailiff's
account of 1319–20 records that the whole of one
field was still being left fallow. (fn. 154) It is of interest in
this connexion that in 1391, when Metteley (see
below) leased the demesne, it was stated that there
were '20 acres of fallow land of which 12 are being
ploughed for the third time and manured with the
fold'. (fn. 155) Pasture was clearly much prized and some
was inclosed at an early date. In 1288, for instance,
Bec's steward accused a man of trying to deprive the
lord and his men of their common pasture, presumably by inclosing, (fn. 156) and it is known that the
demesne had at least 86 acres of separate pasture at
Cote. (fn. 157) Some, if not all, of the meadow was assigned
by lot. (fn. 158)
Early 14th-century tax assessments show that the
community was relatively small and far from rich:
15 persons were assessed in 1306, 16 in 1316, and 15
in 1327. (fn. 159) The total tax of £2 5s. paid in 1316 was
only about a third of that paid by the larger villages
in the hundred, such as Chesterton and Somerton.
The abbey's contribution was naturally the highest,
but it is worth noting that the amount paid by its
grange in 1306 was unusually high—more than three
times as much again as the next highest contributor
—whereas in 1316 it was less than twice as much.
The break in the series of accounts between 1343
and 1360 is in itself significant of the dislocation
caused by the Black Death. The badly written roll
of 1360, (fn. 160) apparently the first since the disaster,
begins by stating that no accounts have been kept
for many years. The pardon, issued to John Hardying
in 1355, of his outlawry for non-appearance before
the justices to answer a plea of the prior that he
render an account of his bailiwick at Cottisford,
affords an explanation, and throws light on the economic difficulties of men in responsible positions in
these disastrous years. (fn. 161)
A comparison of the accounts of 1343 and 1360
well illustrates the severity of the economic consequences. In 1343 the amount realized for the sale
of corn and stock, for instance, was £11; in 1360 it was
£2 18s. 2d. The number of the famuli had dropped
from 13, including 8 ploughmen, to 4, including
the bailiff and only 2 ploughmen. Instead of the
permanent shepherd once employed a shepherd was
paid to fold his own sheep on the lord's land. Rents of
assize had dropped to less than half. A note adds
that villein rents were not more because the tenements were in the lord's hand for lack of tenants.
Furthermore, 9s. had been remitted so that they
might pay the king's 15th. The rent of 13s. 4d. from
one of the chief freehold tenements—John Bar's—
was owing because 'it could not be raised'. The total
receipts in 1343 had been £21 8s. 6¼d. and in 1360
they were £12 15s. 9½d.
The mills and the miller appear also to have been
victims of the declining economic activity. There is
a reference in about 1230 to the erection of a mill and
to its water-power; (fn. 162) one is mentioned in 1291, (fn. 163) and
in 1292 the exits of the manor mill were 30s. for
maslin and malt sold. (fn. 164) At this period there were
both a water and a windmill. The heading custos
molend(inorum) occurs on the 1341–2 account roll,
but not on the 1360 account. (fn. 165)
Another consequence of the Black Death may
have been the final disappearance of the small hamlet of Cote, which seems to have been already in
decline by 1343. (fn. 166) In this connexion an entry on the
1360 account roll stating that 3s. 4d. had not been
paid to William de Audley (lord of Hardwick) for
suit to the hundred done for the lord each year 'pro
terra de Coteland' may be of significance.
Some measure of prosperity had returned to the
manor by the end of the century, but judging from
the tax assessments it seems that the decline noted on
the manor in the early 14th century was a permanent
feature and was probably true of the whole parish.
Cottisford's earlier expansion could not be sustained
in view of its comparatively small area. After the
reassessment of 1334 its tax—in comparison with
Chesterton's or Somerton's—was a good deal lower
than it had been before, (fn. 167) and in 1428, as a village
with fewer than 'ten inhabitants', it escaped taxation. (fn. 168) However, although the system of demesne
farming had been abandoned as unprofitable, (fn. 169) the
manor farm was fairly prosperous and well stocked
at the end of the 14th century. Leasing had become
the rule, and when it was leased in 1391 to Edward
Metteley, a small country gentleman, there were 400
sheep and lambs, 3 horses, 8 oxen, 28 head of poultry,
and a little boar. The crops grown were wheat,
barley, maslin, peas, and oats. (fn. 170) Rye and dredge,
regularly grown at an earlier date, seem to have been
given up. (fn. 171)
The changes of ownership in the 15th century must
have disorganized the economy of the manor. Although granted to Eton College in 1441, after having
been farmed by various laymen since the dissolution
of the alien priories in 1414, Eton did not immediately obtain possession. In 1454 the provost complained that the manor was unjustly detained by the
Sheriff of Oxfordshire, and only obtained a decision
in his favour in 1458. (fn. 172) Eton continued the system of
leasing. The dangers attendant on this practice in
the 15th century may be illustrated by the history of
'Pygot's' freehold. It was leased by John Bar (Barres)
from the college, but on the victory of Edward IV
over Henry VI, relying on the king's hostility to the
college, he planned to keep it permanently. When
the two were reconciled Bar sold 'Pygot's', and it
eventually came by way of the Samwells and Ardens
to Thomas Langston of Tusmore. The last was 'aferde
of hys tytle and would have gyven the college the
patronage of Tusmore to have byn at a poynte with
theyme'. (fn. 173) Throughout the 16th century the Arden
family, members of the class of lesser gentry and
lessees of the Eton manor, were the chief family in
the parish. (fn. 174) John Arden held a freehold of four
yardlands as well (fn. 175) and contributed five-sixths of the
Cottisford tax in 1524. The village paid £13 4s. 4d.
compared with Somerton's £27 1s. 1d. and Chesterton's £18 8s. (fn. 176)
The field system in the absence of any pre-inclosure maps cannot be satisfactorily made out. A
1612 terrier of Eton College's estate mentions a
West and a North Field; in another terrier of 1675
the college's property is said to lie in North and
South Fields; in a late-17th-century glebe terrier the
glebe is described as lying in two fields, of which one
lay eastwards and the other westwards. (fn. 177) In a terrier
of 1700 and another 18th-century terrier of uncertain date the arable land is given as lying in East
and West Fields. (fn. 178) It is doubtful if there were more
than two fields. Considering the position of the
village it would be possible to describe the arable as
lying either north and south, or east and west. There
are frequent references to Cote Field in the terriers,
but this was a close of 100 acres which belonged to
the college. So also did Winter Field (80 a.), (fn. 179) which
may perhaps be identified with the Dry Great
Ground (80 a.) mentioned in 1675. At this last date
closes and meadows amounted to about 172 acres.
Dry Great Ground and Poole Dry Ground (30 a.)
may have been arable closes. (fn. 180)
The open-field system as so often elsewhere led to
boundary disputes. A number of 17th-century
records about these have survived. The fact that
Arden's freehold was 'intermingled' with his 9 yardlands leased from the college gave rise to litigation,
even though in the 16th century at least the boundaries of the two holdings and of others were clearly
distinguished. A college memorandum of that period
states that Arden's 6 yardlands are known by 'a balk
in the middle of the land', Pygot's property 'by balks
in the middle of the acre', and the college property
by 'a balk in the middle of the land'. (fn. 181) Nevertheless,
when Sir Anthony Cope bought 6 yardlands from
the Ardens in 1606, he appears to have been sold
some of Eton College's leasehold along with the
Arden freehold, and protracted disputes followed,
which were only ended by a Chancery decree in 1618
by which the college recovered its demesne. (fn. 182)
At the beginning of the dispute Eton complained
in 1606 of the encroachments of Robert Petty of
Tetsworth, who held a 'very good farm' at Cottisford. (fn. 183) The provost complained that Petty and other
tenants had allowed 'divers wrongs' to be done. In
particular Petty had ploughed up and sown with corn
'Cuckolds Burrowe', and in order to deprive the
parson of his tithes had declared that it belonged
to Hethe parish, the tithes of which Petty farmed. (fn. 184)
A crude contemporary map of 'Cuckolds Burrowe'
shows that Cottisford and Hethe land was here intermixed, the furlongs of each parish being separated
by grass balks. (fn. 185) In a terrier of 1700 the burrow was
said to cover about 8 acres of heath land near Cote
Field, which is known to have been in the south of
the parish near the Hethe boundary. (fn. 186)
Sir Anthony Cope's tenants in Hethe also caused
trouble after 1606 by pasturing their sheep in
Cottisford fields. (fn. 187) The Cottisford tenants retaliated
by cutting down Sir Anthony's corn in Hethe and
making 'a great garboile there'. (fn. 188) Cope offered to discuss the boundary question with the college, (fn. 189) but
the quarrel was still going on in 1607, when a college
tenant complained that Cope had put 200 sheep on
Cottisford common and was seeking 'his own private
gain and the undoing of your poor tenants', who
were unable to pay their rent. (fn. 190) Cope responded
later by accusing the provost's servants of unjustly
detaining his sheep at Cottisford. (fn. 191) Sir Rowland
Lytton, Sir Anthony's brother-in-law, who afterwards sold his land to him, was also involved in this
dispute. It was recorded in 1606 that Lytton had
ploughed up and sown with oats above 100 acres of
land, formerly used as pasture by the college's
tenants. (fn. 192) This may have been the land in the south
of Cottisford parish, on the Hethe border. It is
uncertain whether this land was restored to pasture,
but records in the late 17th century state that closes
covering about 31 acres were customarily shared
with Hethe from Michaelmas to Martlemas, and
there may have once been a larger area of common
land here. (fn. 193)
There might have been similar trouble at this
time with the Fermors of Tusmore and Hardwick,
who held property in Cottisford, had not the college
and Thomas Fermor made a partition as early as
1576 of their pasture and heath in Cottisford. (fn. 194) In
1573 Fermor had gone to law with the college because
of its refusal to divide 300 acres of arable, 10 acres of
meadow, 100 acres each of pasture and heath, and
40 of moor in Hardwick and Cottisford (which they
held together) so that each could have and inclose his
moiety 'according to the statute'. (fn. 195) Rights of intercommoning between the two parishes are likely to
have dated from early times and were no doubt
encouraged by landowners holding land in both
parishes. The Ardens, for instance, had been lords
of Hardwick for most of the 15th century and may
also have already owned land in Cottisford. (fn. 196)
The increasing interest in arable land is shown by
references to the ploughing up of pasture. The
college's tenant at Barsis Place was in trouble in the
1630's on this account and the matter was referred to
the Archbishop of Canterbury. (fn. 197) There are references in 1700 also to 8 acres ploughed for the college
on Juniper Hill, which was part of the heath, when
the tenant of Sir John Holman of Ardley ploughed
Sir John's 'heath piece' there. (fn. 198)
In about 1690 the Eton estate in Cottisford was
valued at £176 10s. a year. Of this the closes and
meadows were worth £126 10s. and the arable in the
common field £50. It is uncertain if all the closes
were meadow, but those so named were worth £70. (fn. 199)
Another 17th-century valuation gives the total value
as £164, but states that the bailiff in 1648 had said
that the farms were worth about £200 besides the
college rent. The rents in kind in 1690 included 60
couple of fat rabbits, valued at £3, and payments of
wheat and malt valued at £57 16s. The entertainment
provided for the college when on progress was
valued at £16. (fn. 200) After 1587 all leases contained a
clause obliging the tenant to provide entertainment
for a day and two nights for the Provost and the
college officers up to the number of ten. (fn. 201)
There is some evidence in the 17th century for the
economic value of the rabbit warren, the history of
which dates back to the Middle Ages, and of the need
to control a potential pest. A warrener of Hardwick
was leasing the warren in 1606, when trouble arose
from poachers. (fn. 202) The rights of the villagers to protect
their corn from the rabbits were carefully preserved,
and the warrener was bound to see that there was no
excessive increase in the number of rabbits. Further
proof of the warren's importance comes from Ogilby's
map, where 'Cottesford or a great Coney warren' is
marked. (fn. 203) The college had 'free game of hunting and
free warren'. (fn. 204) As bucks were a common present to
the college from its tenant in the 17th century, the
heath was clearly the home of large game as well as
small. (fn. 205) A terrier of the manor in 1700, when Laurence
Lord, gent., was tenant and there were five undertenants living in the parish, shows that Dove House
Close and other closes covered about 88 acres and
that there were 56 acres of meadow, including 31
acres shared with Hethe. It is probable from their
position on the ground that all the 31 acres were
meadowland, though only 10 acres were actually
called meadow. The arable still consisted of 18 yardlands of dispersed strips. There were 40 sheep commons, 4 cow, and 2 horse commons to each yardland. (fn. 206)
In the 18th century 54 acres of meadow and closes
were let for £59 19s. 9d. The grounds 'lying open' to
Hethe for six weeks were reckoned as 52½ acres and
were let for £19 8s. Three grounds lying together in
several amounted to 138 acres and were let for
£47 16s. The warren was let for £10. (fn. 207)
During the first half of the 18th century Eton
College's estate was neglected, and when Richard
Eyre took the lease in 1739 he found it in a 'miserable
condition'. (fn. 208) An account of 1759 shows that the
estate then consisted of two farms in Cottisford
worth £90 and £34 a year, the warren worth £8,
Mr. Eyre's own farm and 'very good house' worth
£97, besides the Fringford farm and mill, which were
worth £55 a year. The total gross value was £284.
The average rental of the estate was £8 and the fine
on entry had been set at £250, though it was stated
that it should have been £270. Eyre pleaded for an
abatement on account of his great expenses, which
as the accountant observed 'do indeed appear to have
been very considerable'. (fn. 209) Although Eyre had spent
a great deal on building and repairs, when J. R.
Greenhill, the purchaser of the lease in 1773, paid
£7,300 for it at an auction, he considered that he
had paid 'a very extravagant price' and at least
£1,300 too much. In 1776 he wrote that he had so
far not made 3 per cent. on his money. (fn. 210)
In 1776 the Eton estate consisted of three farms,
the tenant's (the Revd. J. R. Greenhill), and two let
for £130 and £53 respectively. The warren was let
for £8 and some meadow to a butcher of Hethe for
£10—a rent double its real value. (fn. 211) When the lease
of the manor was sold in 1773 it was said to consist of
240 acres of inclosed land and 800 acres of common
field land, with a water-mill and a mill-house at
Fringford. (fn. 212) Some of this land, however, must have
been at Fringford, for the college had 4¼ yardlands
there.
Apart from Eton College, the only proprietors in
the parish in the 18th century were the rector and
the non-resident Fermor family. Together these two
held rather less than half the land. (fn. 213) James Fermor's
property was described in about 1720 as the 'manor
of Cottisford' with a manor-house, several closes, and
23 yardlands and four tenements. It was leased to
William Topping at a yearly rent of £51 10s. (fn. 214) He
resided and farmed his property himself. Evidence
for his sheep-breeding comes from entries in the
parish register: in 1715 'William Topping . . . shore
600 sheep' and 460 in 1716. (fn. 215) From 1725 to 1733 the
family was at law with the college over fishing rights
in Cottisford Great Pond. (fn. 216) When the Ramsays
became proprietors they continued to lease the
estate. (fn. 217) By 1832 a small part of it had been sold to
the rector and the remainder was put on the market
at the Tusmore sale of 1857. (fn. 218) It then consisted of
616 acres, chiefly arable, and was described as a fine
stock farm, suitable for the production of turnips and
barley of the first quality.
Before the inclosure of the open fields in 1854
farming practice had been very conservative. In 1761
Mrs. Martha Eyre and William Fermor of Tusmore (fn. 219)
had taken unsuccessful steps to secure inclosure of
the common fields and obtain an act of Parliament. (fn. 220)
The matter was raised again unsuccessfully in 1777
after Mrs. Eyre's death and again in 1809 by the
college's tenant, the Revd. J. R. Greenhill, Rector of
Fringford. On the second occasion his efforts were
frustrated by the alleged unreasonable demands of
the Rector of Cottisford. (fn. 221) In 1848 an act was finally
obtained, but the award was not made until 1854. (fn. 222)
The chief allottees were the Provost of Eton and his
lessees Edwards Rousby and John Kendal (489 a.),
Sir Henry Dryden and Harriette Eliza Ramsay
(592 a.), and the rector C. S. Harrison. (fn. 223)
When the tithe award was made in September
1855 Eton College had in hand about 30 acres of
plantation and wood, and the manor-house and
grounds, out of its whole estate of 865 acres. Its
tenants William Mansfield at Manor farm and John
Mansfield at Coneygre farm held about 370 and 137
acres respectively. Two other tenants with no houses
in the parish held about 270 and 41 acres respectively.
The college also had nine comparatively new cottages in the south-east corner of the parish. The
cottages in the village and at Juniper Hill were owned
by the Fermor trustee or by their occupiers. The
chief tenant on the Fermor estate, Richard Woods,
held three holdings of over 332 acres, 255 acres, and
27 acres, amounting to about 615 acres. There were
two closes of about 30 acres (Home and Dove Home
closes), which were exempt from tithe. The parson's
glebe was about 70 acres. There were 676½ acres of
arable at this time and about 82 acres of meadow and
pasture including the non-tithable closes. A large
part of the parish (350 a. 1 r.) was still uncultivated
heathland held in common. (fn. 224) The tithe map marks
some land as sainfoin ground, but there is no evidence
about when the crop was first introduced.
In 1881 the Ordnance Survey map shows that
Heath Farm had been built in the north of the parish
and that there were five farms in all. In 1951 there
were also five farms, including the experimental
farm of Twyford Mills Ltd., the seed merchants of
Banbury, (fn. 225) but much of their land lay outside the
parish boundaries.
No constables' or overseers' books have survived,
and the vestry minutes (1854–1928) and highway
surveyors' books (1828–49), as might be expected in
a small rural parish, are uninformative. (fn. 226) With some
exceptions a vestry was held annually. In 1856–7, at
the time of a dispute with Hethe over rates and
boundaries, of which no details have survived, there
were eight meetings. Until 1872, when constables
ceased to be appointed, the village had two. There
were 2 churchwardens, 2 overseers of the poor, and
4 allotment wardens until the last were reduced to 2
in the 1880's. In addition a guardian and two sur
veyors of the roads were annually appointed, and
after 1865 a way-warden. From 1893 the vestry only
appointed the churchwardens. Attendance at meetings dropped from 6 or 7 men to 2 or 3 in the 1870's
during the agricultural depression and thereafter
remained mostly at two. On one occasion in 1922 no
one attended.
The first record of the parish's concern for the
poor occurs in 1754 when two cottages were built on
Juniper Hill for the use of the poor. They cost
£28 7s. 6d. and the money was raised by a rate
charged on the landholders. (fn. 227) The poor rate in Cottisford, as elsewhere in the county, rose rapidly in the
late 18th century. In 1776 it was £32 10s. and in 1803
nearly £78. The rate of 4s. in the £ was rather higher
than the average and was unusually high for a thinly
populated parish. (fn. 228)
In the early 19th century the poor were accustomed
to keep their cattle on the heath and had the right
to cut furze and brushwood, but later the farmers
'usurped and sold the privilege'. (fn. 229) Flora Thompson
has described in Lark Rise how towards the end of the
century landless labourers had to keep their families
on 10s. a week, but that the community was healthy
and happy. (fn. 230)
Apart from an occasional groom or mason recorded in the parish registers, the inhabitants of
Cottisford were nearly all farmers and agricultural
labourers in the 18th and 19th centuries. There was
a considerable increase in numbers since the 17th
century. The nine householders recorded in the
hearth tax return of 1662 and the six recorded in
1665 represent the richer inhabitants, though two of
them were ultimately discharged from payment on
the grounds of poverty. (fn. 231) In fact there were many
more householders. The Eton estate alone had ten
tenants with houses or cottages in the parish in
1675: (fn. 232) in addition there was the rector and the
tenants of the Fermor manor. In 1676 the Compton
Census recorded 46 adults in the parish. The Fermor
farm-house still survives, but there is no record of its
cottages until 1855, when the tithe award shows that
there were then ten on the estate. (fn. 233) In 1738 the incumbent recorded twelve cottages, a farm-house, and
a gentleman's house (i.e. Eton College's house and
the present Cottisford House). (fn. 234) No Rectory was recorded throughout the century. There was some increase by 1768, when 18 families and 99 inhabitants
were returned. The decade 1710–20 had the highest
number of baptisms in the century. (fn. 235) There was a
rapid rise in the 19th century. Numbers increased
from 105 in 1801 to 187 in 1841 and to 263 in 1851. (fn. 236)
The village then had a blacksmith and a baker. (fn. 237)
Some of the new inhabitants were immigrants from
outside: in 1841 there were 47 of these. (fn. 238) The peak
was reached in 1871 with 327 persons. Thereafter on
account of the agricultural depression numbers
dropped to 240 in 1881. Mechanization encouraged
the decline: in 1931 there were 169 inhabitants,
mostly at Juniper Hill, and only 154 in 1951. (fn. 239)
Church.
Before 1081 Hugh de Grantmesnil had
given the church with the tithes and a hide of land
to the abbey of St. Évroul in Normandy. (fn. 240) In 1167
St. Évroul transferred its Cottisford property to the
Norman abbey of Bec, which already held the manor,
in return for an annual pension of 13s. 4d. (fn. 241) Although
the patronage of the church is not mentioned, it was
undoubtedly included in the grant, for from the
early 13th century the Proctor of Bec, usually the
Prior of Ogbourne, presented. (fn. 242) When the lands of
the alien priories were confisicated by the king during
the Hundred Years War, Ogbourne's property, including the advowson of Cottisford, passed to the
Crown. The king, therefore, presented in 1370, 1374,
1375, and 1403. Henry IV granted away the manor
in 1404, and thereafter the advowson followed the
descent of the manor. Thus Eton College became
patron in 1441, and retained the advowson until
1923, when it was transferred to the Bishop of Oxford. Since 1867 it had been held with Tusmorewith-Hardwick.
Bec never appropriated Cottisford, but from the
early 13th century received a pension from the rector
of 13s. 4d., (fn. 243) which went to St. Évroul according to
the arrangement of 1167. (fn. 244) This pension, which was
paid to the Prior of Ogbourne, (fn. 245) was taken over by
the king with the advowson, and by him granted to
Eton College. (fn. 246) It was not infrequently in arrears,
and is not mentioned in 1535.
Cottisford in the Middle Ages was a very poor
church, worth £2 in 1254, and £2 13s. 4d. at the new
valuation of 1291. (fn. 247) By 1535 it was worth £6 13s. 4d. (fn. 248)
During the next 200 years the value first rose
rapidly to £66 net in 1611 (as recorded by the rector),
and then dropped to £48 by the beginning of the
18th century, when it was discharged from the payment of tenths. (fn. 249) In 1723 it was helped by a gift of
£200 from Queen Anne's Bounty and the same
amount from the Dean of St. Paul's. (fn. 250) The greatest
part of the income came from the tithes, which were
commuted in 1856 for £321. (fn. 251) It is to be noted that
a few acres in Hethe and Hardwick were tithable to
the Rector of Cottisford. (fn. 252)
According to an imperfect terrier dated 1686, the
glebe consisted of about 60 acres. (fn. 253) At about this
time Bishop Fell noted—'The glebe much embezled,
some akers quite lost, others lessend'. (fn. 254) The church
registers of this period and later also contain memoranda regarding the glebe. In 1848 it consisted of
50 acres. (fn. 255)
The first known documentary record of the parsonage house comes from the terrier of 1606, (fn. 256) which
mentions 'an orchard, garden, little close, homestall and meadow adjacent to the parsonage house',
and states that the rector may have furze to burn at
his house at Cottisford. However, the date 1618 or
1619 can be made out at the back of the present
Rectory house, and the tithe barn bears the date 1651,
when it was restored. The house, its outbuildings (fn. 257)
and barn (fn. 258) were in a bad state in the second half of
the 18th century, and though repaired (fn. 259) by 1810, the
rector, Samuel Cooke, complained to Eton about the
house. (fn. 260) As a result the old Rectory was pulled down
in 1821 and a new house was built for about £450
(builder, Peake of Fringford) at the expense of the
rector, T. W. Champneys. (fn. 261) He, however, continued
to live at Fulmer (Bucks.). (fn. 262) Non-residence in fact
did not cease until the presentation of C. S. Harrison
in 1853, when he enlarged the Rectory house at the
then considerable cost of £400. (fn. 263)
No connexion has been found between the medieval
rectors and the patrons, Ogbourne Priory and Eton
College. Cottisford was no doubt too poor a living to
attract Eton graduates. (fn. 264) James Arden (rector 1521–
46) was probably a relative of the Arden family, the
lessees of the manor. While he was rector John
Arden (d. 1535), besides leaving bequests to the
church, made elaborate provision for memorial
services there. For a year after his death five priests
were to keep his 'month's mind'; during the same
year a priest was to say services for him, probably
every day; and for seven years five priests were to
say a yearly dirge and five masses for him. (fn. 265)
Non-resident rectors did not become usual until
the 18th century, but an exception was Robert Clay
(1609–24), a Fellow of Merton and a pluralist, (fn. 266) from
whom the living was sequestered in 1616 for nonresidence. (fn. 267) None of the resident rectors is worthy
of note except William Paxton, who was a shining
example of devotion to his cure, since the registers
are consistently kept in his handwriting throughout
the 29 years (1691–1720) of his incumbency. By contrast, the visitation return of 1738, (fn. 268) made by James
Smith (1727–68), discloses an unsatisfactory state
of affairs. To begin with, Smith was a pluralist: 'I
constantly supply my vicarage of Hurley in Berks . . .
tho' my family lives at a small Hospital (at Stoke) in
Bucks. of which I am Master.' Smith paid for a
resident curate, John Lord by name, though apparently not related to the family at the manorhouse. Lord conducted two services on Sundays,
read prayers on Holy Days, and celebrated Holy
Communion three times a year. But there were very
few communicants and children were not sent by
their parents to be catechized, though, as Lord
assured the bishop, he did his best for them. Lord
also told the bishop that as the parish consisted 'of
but few inhabitants and those chiefly illiterate and
indigent labourers', the children's parents 'had it
not in their power to instruct them themselves nor
the means of procuring the instruction of a common
school-master'. (fn. 269)
Unfortunately, John Prinsep, who succeeded Smith
and who, in the return of 1768, (fn. 270) declared that he
constantly resided at the Rectory house, was already
an old man and died after a year at Cottisford. He
had no time to improve what he found—'lukewarmness superabundant'. Prinsep's successor, Samuel
Cooke, held the living for 51 years, but he is chiefly
remembered as an opponent of inclosure and as a
non-resident for at least part of his incumbency. He
declared that the Rectory was 'so confined as not to
admit of any clergyman's residence, however desirable in the neighbourhood of so many Roman
Catholics belonging to the Fermor estates'. (fn. 271) For a
time Cottisford was served by the Rector of Hethe:
in 1793 he reported that the people attended church
well and that a Sunday school was supported by
private subscription. (fn. 272) Later (1814) the parish was
served by a curate, living at Hethe. (fn. 273) Matters did not
begin to improve until the advent in 1853 of C. S.
Harrison, who followed Francis Hodgson, Provost of
Eton and rector from 1842 to 1852. Harrison resided
constantly in his parish until his death in 1896. He
restored the church and keenly supported the day
school. (fn. 274) As 'Mr. Ellison' he figures in Lark Rise,
where he is unsympathetically portrayed by Flora
Thompson as an old-fashioned, if kindly, autocrat.
The church of ST. MARY is a small building
dating from the 13th century. It was described in the
early 19th century as a 'low mean structure consisting
of a tower covered with slate, a nave and chancel'. (fn. 275)
The 'tower' was, however, no more than a bell-cote
contrived by raising the pitch of the roof at the west
end of the nave. The roof was made uniform in the
19th century, and the church now consists of a chancel,
an aisleless nave, and a south porch. The three-light
east window of the chancel seems to be late 13th
century: a recess on the north side contains a stone
tomb-slab decorated with the stem of a cross. The
remains of the original rood-screen steps, rough
stones about 2 feet high, were formerly visible under
the pulpit. The south porch has a 13th-century doorway and two mass-clocks on the west side of the
porch; there is also a priest's door.
When Rawlinson visited the church in 1718, he
found it very much out of repair and 'very nastily
kept by reason of holes and a pigeon house at the
west end of it.' (fn. 276) The only 18th-century work recorded is the pointing of the walls and relaying of the
pavement of the porch in 1757, (fn. 277) but the imposts of
the chancel arch have crudely cut classical mouldings
which suggest that the arch was reconstructed in the
late 17th or 18th centuries. The parishioners reseated the north side with open sittings in 1849 and
the south side in 1854. In 1860 the rector, C. S. Harrison, reported that the fabric was in a very dilapidated
condition, the roof not weatherproof, the windows
unsightly, and the accommodation insufficient.
Hopes of enlarging the church came to nothing,
but restoration was carried out in 1861 by Charles
Buckeridge at a cost of £365, largely raised by private
subscription. (fn. 278) Most of the square-headed windows
were gothicized, (fn. 279) and the small belfry shown in
Buckler's drawing of 1825 was taken down. The
church was retiled with Daneshill tiles in 1933.
The font was given in 1861 by John Mansfield of
Hethe. There is a carved royal coat of arms of
Georgian date (1714–1801), and an oak screen, dating
from the 17th century, which was given by the
rector, S. M. Statham, in 1935. The 18th-century
organ, from the chapel in Steane Park, was installed
in about 1940 as a memorial to him. It was made by
Samuel Parsons of London: it has a sliding keyboard
and an elegant mahogany case of Gothic design. (fn. 280)
There is a mutilated brass without inscription
depicting a man in armour and his wife, both kneeling, and thirteen children. It bears the arms of
Samwell and probably commemorates John Samwell
(d. c. 1500), leaseholder of Eton's manor. (fn. 281) There
was once a memorial inscription to Robert Petty
(d. 1612), a Cottisford landowner, but it cannot now
be traced. (fn. 282) There are wall monuments to the following: Richard Eyre (d. 1761) and his wife Martha
Eyre (d. 1772); (fn. 283) James Edwards Rousby (d. 1848);
Edwards Rousby (d. 1875); and C. S. Harrison
(rector 1853–96). There is a tablet commemorating
John Mansfield's charity. (fn. 284)
At the Reformation the church owned a parcelgilt chalice, two sets of vestments, two copes, and a
censer. (fn. 285) In the Commonwealth period there were a
silver chalice, a carpet, and two chests. (fn. 286) There are
now two Elizabethan chairs from Cottisford House
in the sanctuary, and an old iron chest brought in 1953
from Fringford church. The present Elizabethan
chalice and paten cover (1585) are respectively inscribed 'Cotsford Church Cup' and 'Cotsford'. Another chalice and paten, purchased in Spain, were
presented by the 4th Earl of Effingham of Tusmore
Park. (fn. 287)
The timber belfry in the apex of the roof contains
two bells, dated 1710 and 1858, there were also two
in the 16th century. A small late-17th-century sanctus
bell is in the church. (fn. 288)
The earliest register contains baptisms from 1611,
marriages from 1651, and burials from 1610. Those
for baptisms 1760–1811 and burials 1762–1812 contain notes on the parish.
The base and part of the shaft of an ancient
cross still stand in the churchyard near the south
porch.
Nonconformity.
In the late 16th and early
17th centuries the Arden family, lessees of the manor,
were recusants. (fn. 289) John Arden, his wife, and Ann
Arden were fined as such in 1603, and his widow was
again fined in 1605. (fn. 290) In 1610 Margaret Ewer was
fined. (fn. 291) In spite of the fact that Cottisford was close
to the Fermor estate at Tusmore, and that the
Fermors held land in Cottisford, there were few
Roman Catholics. One was recorded in 1685; (fn. 292) perhaps another, Thomas Pape, 'a Papist and carpenter',
in 1701; (fn. 293) and in 1738 the rector wrote a full account
of a papist farmer's daughter to the bishop. (fn. 294) In the
early 19th century one family was visited by a priest
from Tusmore. (fn. 295)
Protestant dissent has never been strong. A Methodist meeting-house was opened in 1844, (fn. 296) but there
were only a few members, (fn. 297) and in 1860 the rector
could write that 'the greatest unity prevails from
almost the absence of dissent'. (fn. 298) In Lark Rise Flora
Thompson (fn. 299) mentions a small group of Methodists, who met in a cottage in Juniper Hill in the
1880's.
Schools.
In 1808 a dame school supported by
subscriptions taught 12 children to read. (fn. 300) It had
closed by 1815 when a few children attended Hethe
school. (fn. 301) A Sunday school was established by 1819
and had 30 pupils in 1833. (fn. 302) There was a dame school
again, supported by the rector, by 1852, and by the
inclosure award of 1854 a plot was set aside for a
village school. The rector said that it was impossible
to raise the necessary money in the neighbourhood, (fn. 303)
but with the help of Eton College a National school
consisting of one large room was built in 1856 to
accommodate 50 children. A two-roomed cottage
adjoining it was built for the schoolmistress. (fn. 304) There
were 30 pupils in 1860 (fn. 305) and 42 in 1906. (fn. 306) Flora
Thompson has described the school in the 1880's
in Lark Rise. It was closed in 1920, but in 1924 it
was leased to the County Council and reopened as a
Council school. It was reorganized as a junior school
in 1929 when the senior pupils were transferred to
Fringford. There were 17 pupils in 1937 and 22 in
1954. (fn. 307)
Charities.
By will proved 1869 John Mansfield
of Hethe left £100 in stock in trust for the poor, the
yearly dividend to be distributed at Christmas to six
of the oldest deserving poor of the parish. (fn. 308) At
Christmas 1954 six old people received 9s. each.
Louisa Catherine Rousby of Cottisford House, by
will proved 1917, left £100, the interest to be divided
between the four oldest and most deserving inhabitants each year at Christmas. In 1954 four
recipients were given 18s. 6d. each.
Grace Margaret Harrison bequeathed £100 in
1923 for the benefit of six of the oldest and most
deserving poor. Six old people received 11s. 8d. each
in 1954. It is permissible for one person to share in
more than one charity, and the number of recipients
of the three charities in 1954 was fourteen. (fn. 309)