TIRLEY
Tirley is a rural parish on the west side of the
River Severn, 4 miles below Tewkesbury and 6
miles north of Gloucester. It is 1,924 a. in area (fn. 1) and
fairly compact, stretching 2½ miles from east to west
and the same from north to south at the widest
part. The Severn forms the whole of the eastern
boundary; (fn. 2) it is crossed at Tirley by the Haw Bridge,
which replaced an earlier ferry crossing. (fn. 3) Tirley was
one of the estates of the monastery of Deerhurst that
were divided between Westminster Abbey and St.
Denis, Paris, (fn. 4) so that it later lay in two hundreds. (fn. 5)
The boundaries of Deerhurst hundred and Westminster hundred within Tirley have not been
precisely identified, and they followed those of
various estates which until inclosure in 1798 (fn. 6) lay
intermingled throughout the parish. (fn. 7)
Most of the land lies below the 100 ft. contour line,
sloping down to the riverside meadows which are
liable to flooding. The flat land of the river's floodplain is alluvial. Further west the ground is gently
undulating and lies on the red marl of the Triassic.
In the south-west corner a ridge formed by the
Rhaetic beds underlying the Lower Lias limestone
extends into the parish from Hasfield as a steeply
sloped, flat-topped hill, Corse Wood Hill, rising to
250 ft. The blue-grey shaly stone there has been
quarried, and it was presumably to a quarry there
that Rudder referred when he recorded that none of
the houses in Tirley was built of stone although there
was near-by a quarry 'of fine blue stone, with a very
straight smooth surface, proper for building'. (fn. 8) This
appears to be the stone of which the parish church,
the school, and parts of Wigwood Farm, Tirley
Court, and several farm buildings are built. It has
not weathered well.
The western part of the parish was within the
large waste or common called Corse Lawn, which
was formerly Corse Chase (fn. 9) and extended from Corse
across Tirley into Eldersfield and Chacely. Until
inclosure in 1798 the part of Corse Lawn in Tirley
was rough grazing land, (fn. 10) of which a scrub-covered
fragment survived in 1964 on the steep slopes of the
south-west corner of the parish. In the Middle Ages
there was a fair proportion of woodland in the
parish. In 1221 common of pasture in Charlewood
belonged to a tenement in Tirley; at that date the
wood was so wasted that it had been fenced to enable
its regrowth. (fn. 11) Robert atte Green alleged the theft
of timber trees from his estate at Tirley in 1358, (fn. 12)
and the same estate included 30 a. of woodland in
1490. (fn. 13) Tirley manor contained 100 a. of woodland
in the early 16th century. (fn. 14) On the Haw manor,
however, which may have had a high proportion of
riverside land, the timber was said to be barely
sufficient for repairs in 1543. (fn. 15) In later periods many
orchards were planted in Tirley, but in the mid-20th
century most of them were either broken up or
allowed to decay, and were used mainly for pasture.
The riverside land is suited primarily for meadow
and pasture, and from some time before inclosure
arable land has formed a small proportion of the
parish. Until 1798, however, there were several open
fields which at least originated as arable. (fn. 16)
Settlement in the parish is scattered. The original
settlement of the parish in the pre-Conquest period
may have followed the piecemeal exploitation of
waste or wooded land, and several of the place-names
— Tirley, the Haw, Cumberwood, and perhaps
Ellings — signify clearings and inclosures. (fn. 17) There
appear to have been two main groups of houses, and
each of these was strung out by the late 18th century
and has been fragmented by later changes. In
addition there are smaller groups that existed on
their isolated sites long before inclosure, and also
many scattered cottages. The chief manor-house,
Tirley Court, occupies one of the remoter sites,
close under Corse Wood Hill, where, as the medieval
name of the manor indicates, there was a house by
the mid-14th century. (fn. 18) The church, with the village
pound near-by, (fn. 19) the former vicarage, and the village
school all stand a little apart from the main settlement groups (see page 272).
The two main groups of houses are at Tirley
Street and the Haw. At the Haw, houses stretched for
over half a mile along the river bank, with a farmhouse at each end and at the centre the Haw Bridge
Inn, an 18th-century house that was formerly the
Passage Inn. (fn. 20) Downstream from the inn two of the
houses are timber-framed and survive, apparently,
from the 16th century; one is thatched. The others
are mainly 18th-century brick buildings, and include
a large malt-house, the riverside end of which forms
a house with a pedimented door. Upstream from the
Haw Bridge Inn is another inn, the New Inn, and
beyond it the road led past one or two houses along
the river to Haw Green. (fn. 21) At Haw Green, Malthouse
Farm and a dozen cottages, built mostly of brick
in the 19th century, survived in 1964, but buildings
between the New Inn and Haw Green, and others
beyond Haw Green, were demolished in the later
19th century. (fn. 22)
The settlement at Tirley Street lies in the eastern
half of the parish a little way above the edge of the
river's flood-plain. Tirley Street formed a double
bend and was part of the main east-west route
through the parish, but in the 1820's the northern
bend was by-passed by a new road built in connexion
with the Haw Bridge scheme. (fn. 23) The older surviving
part of the village therefore lies just off the main
road. It includes timber-framed cottages, with brick
or plaster fillings and thatch roofs; some were later
cased in brick, and several have a single gable-end
chimney. At Top Farm there is a cruck-framed barn
of two bays, the side framing incorporating deep,
curved braces from sill almost to eaves level. The
later houses are of brick. From the southern bend in
the village street a hollow lane called Pankery Lane (fn. 24)
led south-west to several scattered houses and thence
to Tirley Court. Most of those houses, however,
have disappeared, and Pankery Lane leads only to a
17th-century brick and timber-framed house called
Red Castle. Red Castle, which was formerly a
farm-house, (fn. 25) retains some 17th-century internal
features, and is alleged by unsubstantiated and
unlikely tradition to have been Queen Margaret's
headquarters before the battle of Tewkesbury in
1471. (fn. 26) At its north-western end Tirley Street has
expanded along the main road. The few timberframed and thatched cottages there are outnumbered
by later houses, including two mid-Victorian brick
villas and seven pairs of mid-20th century council
houses.
Of the smaller settlement sites Town Street was
occupied by 1248, (fn. 27) Cumberwood by 1324, and
Sandpits by 1658. (fn. 28) All lay in the north-eastern part
of the parish, and each included two farmsteads. (fn. 29)
In the south-eastern part of the parish there was a
scattered settlement at Nethers Green and along
Nethers Green Lane; (fn. 30) the settlement, which by
1964 comprised Tirley Hill Farm, two old cottages,
and some small 20th-century houses, is likely to
be the same as the 'Netheweie' or 'Netherweye'
recorded between 1199 and 1236. (fn. 31) In the western
part of the parish cottages strung out in a line north
of the main road towards Tirley Knowle look as
though they derive from squatter settlements built
on the edge of Corse Lawn. Later, scattered brick
houses were built there on small allotments made at
inclosure in 1798. (fn. 32) A few isolated houses were built
in the western part of the parish in the 19th and 20th
centuries. A village hall, vested in trustees was built
in 1933 on the new road by-passing Tirley Street. (fn. 33)
An unlicensed alehouse was being kept in Tirley
in 1662. (fn. 34) The inn at the Haw Passage was recorded
in 1755 (fn. 35) and perhaps in 1695, when there was an
inn in the parish. (fn. 36) By 1843 there was in addition the
New Inn at Haw Bridge, (fn. 37) and by 1884 two alehouses, the 'Bee Hive' at New Pools and the
'Prince's Plume' in Tirley Street, neither of which
survived in 1923. (fn. 38) The New Inn and the Haw
Bridge Inn survived in 1964.
The population of Tirley appears to have increased
between 1327, when 27 people were assessed for
tax, (fn. 39) and the mid-16th century, when there were
said to be c. 180 communicants (fn. 40) and 60 households. (fn. 41) Between then and the mid-17th century
there was little change; there were 220 communicants in 1603 (fn. 42) and 198 adults in 1676, (fn. 43) and the
number of families was 50 in 1650. (fn. 44) By the early
18th century there had been an increase in the
number of houses, though the total population was
put at only c. 300; (fn. 45) and there was thought to have
been a decrease in population between then and
c. 1775 when the number of houses was given as
66 and the population as 280. (fn. 46) The numbers of
inhabitants are likely to be underestimates, for in
1801 there were 365 people in 66 houses. The
population rose to 550 in 1841; thereafter it fell
from 539 in 1861 to 393 in 1891 and 304 in 1931.
In 1951 it was 295, and 316 in 1961. (fn. 47)
The main road over Corse Lawn from Gloucester
to Upton upon Severn (Worcs.) crosses the northwest corner of the parish. It was a turnpike road
from 1747 to 1878. (fn. 48) From it a road branches off and
runs through the parish to the river crossing at the
Haw, and is crossed at Elm Pool by a minor road
leading from Ashleworth and Hasfield to Tewkesbury. The minor road, which runs along the edge of
the flood-plain, was called Ridge Way in 1613 (fn. 49) and
Port Lane in 1798; (fn. 50) until inclosure in 1798 its
course between the church and Town Street was
further east. (fn. 51) Several narrow lanes connect the
scattered settlements of the parish with the through
routes.
The passage of the Severn at the Haw was
recorded in 1248. (fn. 52) Two 12th-century bowls were
found there in the river bed, (fn. 53) which may indicate a
slightly earlier date for the crossing. Walter le
Passour was among the taxpayers of the Haw in
1327, (fn. 54) and in 1332 Walter son of Walter le Passour
was pardoned for acquiring from the Prior of Deerhurst, without licence, a life tenure of the passage
over the water of Haw. (fn. 55) In 1629 the passage or ferry
belonged to the lord of Tirley and Haw manors, (fn. 56)
but by 1721 it belonged to a much smaller estate. (fn. 57)
Later it was owned by the owners of the Passage
Inn. (fn. 58) Acts of Parliament of 1823 and 1824 appointed
commissioners who were to acquire all the rights in
the ferry, which then carried carriages as well as
animals and people, and build a bridge. The commissioners were also empowered to build new
approach roads, (fn. 59) and it was proposed that Haw
Bridge and its roads should provide both a local
route between Cheltenham and Ledbury and a post
road into Wales. The bridge was opened in 1825 and
the approach road through Tirley was straightened
and raised on an embankment over the low-lying
land. (fn. 60) Toll-houses were built at the east end of the
bridge (fn. 61) and at Elm Pool in Tirley. (fn. 62) In 1826, however, the Mythe Bridge by Tewkesbury was built (fn. 63)
and attracted much traffic; the more ambitious plans
for improving the roads leading to Haw Bridge
were abandoned. The original Haw Bridge, designed
by James Walker, later President of the Institute of
Civil Engineers, (fn. 64) was of three spans of slender cast
iron ribs supported on two stone piers. (fn. 65) Tolls were
paid for using the bridge until it became a county
bridge in 1890. (fn. 66) In 1958 a barge-tanker hit the
bridge, and the whole superstructure collapsed. In
1959 a temporary military bridge was built, and a
new permanent bridge was begun a few yards downstream. The new bridge, of three steel spans resting
on stone piers and abutments, was opened in 1961. (fn. 67)
A bridge called Newbridge in 1387, when it was
out of repair through the default of the lord of
Tirley Rye manor, (fn. 68) may have been the bridge that
carried the road to Haw Green across the watercourse draining the meadow. In 1668 (fn. 69) and 1798
that bridge was recorded as Sea Bridge. (fn. 70)
While the crossing of the River Severn has been
an important feature in the history of the parish, the
river itself has also played a major part. Its tendency
to flood has brought danger and damage, but also an
increased fertility to the meadow-land. (fn. 71) As a means
of transport the river has been used by the inhabitants of the parish for a double traffic, the
carriage of hay grown in the district upstream to the
Midlands, and the return carriage of coal; the Goose
Stone wharf just above Haw Bridge was in use until
the early 1930's. (fn. 72) The inhabitants of Tirley also
exploited the river in a less obvious way, as recorded
by 18th-century writers: by stirring the river bed
and using nets from boats in times of flood, (fn. 73) or by
raking in summer, they got a large quantity of small
smooth coal which fetched a good price for use in the
furnaces of Gloucester. (fn. 74)
Jeremiah Hawkins (d. 1835) of the Haw achieved
local fame for his enthusiastic fox-hunting and for
his habit of swimming his horse across the Severn. (fn. 75)
In his old age he was one of the Haw Bridge commissioners. (fn. 76)
The discovery of a dismembered body in the river
at Haw Bridge in 1938 aroused much popular
interest. (fn. 77)
Manors and Other Estates.
The whole
of Tirley was included in an Anglo-Saxon survey of
land belonging to the monastery of Deerhurst. (fn. 78)
When the lands of the monastery were divided
between the abbeys of St. Peter at Westminster and
St. Denis in Paris, Tirley was itself divided, the
larger part going to Westminster Abbey. Four estates
in Tirley are distinguished in Domesday, three
belonging to Westminster and one to St. Denis.
The largest single estate was the 2½ hides belonging
to St. Denis, which was not named but was simply
described as beyond the Severn. At 'Telinge' Westminster Abbey had 2 hides which had been held in
1066 by Godric but in 1086 had apparently no mesne
tenant; the name of the estate survived in the name
of the meadow, Tirley Ellings. Another 1¼ hide in
Tirley, held in 1066 by Edric, was in 1086 held of
Westminster Abbey by William son of Baderon and
Abbot Baldwin of Bury St. Edmund's in equal
parts. (fn. 79)
The estate of 2 hides that had been held by Godric
was apparently the same as the manor called
APPERLEY'S PLACE in the 14th and 15th
centuries, (fn. 80) CORSE COURT in the 16th, (fn. 81) and
TIRLEY manor from 1542. (fn. 82) It continued to be
held of Westminster Abbey (fn. 83) and after the Dissolution was granted to the Dean and Chapter of Westminster. (fn. 84) In the early 14th century the manor was
held of the abbey by Osbert d'Abitot, who in 1328
granted it, with Apperley manor in Deerhurst and
other property, to Robert and Margaret of
Apperley. (fn. 85) From them it descended, with Apperley
manor, through the Bridges family to the Throckmortons. Sir William Throckmorton, Bt., who sold
Apperley manor (fn. 86) and various lands in Tirley,
retained Tirley manor at his death in 1629, but his
son and heir, Sir Baynham Throckmorton, (fn. 87) sold it
in 1632 to Thomas Coventry, Lord Coventry. (fn. 88)
Tirley manor thereafter descended with the barony,
and later the earldom, of Coventry. (fn. 89) In 1964 the
trustees of the estates of the Earls of Coventry owned
635 a., about one-third of the parish, including
Tirley Court farm (the largest in the parish) and
Town Street farm. (fn. 90)
The manor-house, formerly called Corse Court
but afterwards Tirley Court, was occupied by the
lords of the manor in the 16th century and early
17th. (fn. 91) It was probably the house with nine hearths
occupied by William Cooper in 1672. (fn. 92) The house
surviving in 1964 was a rectangular building of
brick enlarged in the late 19th century but retaining
some stone-mullioned and transomed windows and
other features from an earlier house, apparently of
the 17th century.
The estate held in 1086 by William son of Baderon
later passed to the Monmouth family and thence to
the Earls of Lancaster, who held it as ¼ knight's fee. (fn. 93)
In 1361 the manor of RYE was held of the Duchy of
Lancaster by Robert de Green for his life. (fn. 94) Robert
de Green was evidently the same as Robert Blackwell, lord of Rye in 1387, (fn. 95) for in 1407 Maud, late
wife of Robert atte Green, and her son Henry held
land at Tirley and Rye as of the Duchy of Lancaster. (fn. 96)
In 1442 and 1455 the manor of Rye was held for life
by Elizabeth, the wife formerly of Thomas Swynford,
knight, and then of Thomas Rothwell. (fn. 97) In or before
1468 it was granted, under the seal of the Duchy of
Lancaster, to Clement, Thomas, and Richard
Polynak for life in survivorship; (fn. 98) In 1487 it was
granted during pleasure to John Heron, to hold it as
fully as had Peter Curtis by a grant of Edward IV. (fn. 99)
Agnes Chamber, who with her husband John had
held a smaller estate in Tirley and Haw in 1454, (fn. 100)
died in 1490 seised of 5 messuages and over 300 a. in
Tirley, held of the Duchy of Lancaster; this
presumably comprised the manor of Rye. From 1490
until 1506 or later Agnes's lands were occupied by
her son, Henry Chamber. (fn. 101) By 1532 William Throckmorton, lord of Tirley manor, was leasing the Rye
from the Duchy of Lancaster, (fn. 102) and his son and heir,
Thomas, received in 1566 a 40-year lease of the site
of the manor, called Rye Court, which in 1591 was
held by Thomas's son Thomas. (fn. 103) The Rye Farm,
also known as Tirley Rye, belonged in 1657 and
1672 to John Browne, owner of the Great Cumberwood estate, (fn. 104) but in 1686 a conveyance was made of a
quarter of Rye manor. (fn. 105) By 1727 Rye Farm with
c. 25 a. belonged to Joseph Millard, who died that
year (fn. 106) and had acquired property in the parish in
1721. (fn. 107) The farm-house may have been that with
three hearths occupied in 1672 by Mrs. Browne, (fn. 108)
but it was rebuilt in brick in the 19th century. It was
not inhabited after c. 1870; it was used for storage
in 1964, by which time the land had been added to
Malthouse farm. (fn. 109)
The farm and chief messuage of WIGWOOD may
also have been part of the Rye manor. In 1693 they
were conveyed by Anne Tompkins, daughter and
coheir of John Tompkins of Tirley, to her relation
Thomas Miniett of Tirley, who had married Susan
Tompkins in 1678. Thomas Miniett's daughter
Elizabeth married John Hopkins in 1720. Wigwood
was thereafter occupied, and usually owned, by
members of the Hopkins family, and Mr. J. T.
Hopkins was the owner and occupier in 1964. (fn. 110) The
house may be the one with three hearths occupied
by Simon Tompkins in 1672. (fn. 111) It includes a room
with early 17th-century panelling, and the kitchen
quarters incorporate two walls of stone like that of
the parish church and three arched freestone
openings, apparently rebuilt, that appear to derive
from an ecclesiastical building. (fn. 112) In the same part of
the house are some stone windows with mullions
and dripmoulds of the 17th century. The house was
enlarged or partly rebuilt in 1730, (fn. 113) on an L-shaped
plan. In the early 19th century the house was
altered to include a new staircase.
Another branch of the Hopkins family owned
MALTHOUSE FARM, known in 1865 as Haw
Court. It had belonged in 1711 to Thomas Cole and
in 1737 to John Chadner, whose daughter Sarah
married Thomas Hopkins of Wigwood. The farm
was c. 110 a. and belonged in 1865 to Miss S. A.
Hopkins, (fn. 114) and in 1964 to Mr. E. G. W. Reynolds.
The house is a brick building of the 19th century.
The estate held in 1086 by Abbot Baldwin may
have been merged with the Rye manor; alternatively,
it may have become the estate held in the early 15th
century of the Duchy of Lancaster as of the manor
of Rye. (fn. 115) That estate was called HASTINGS, and
is to be associated with the Hastings family of Tirley
recorded in 1310, 1313, (fn. 116) 1327, (fn. 117) and 1345. (fn. 118) It may
have been the estate quitclaimed in 1390 by Thomas
of Clifton and his wife Joan to Thomas Bridges. (fn. 119)
Edmund Bridges, who was apparently the man that
held Tirley and Apperley manors, died holding
Hastings in 1408. (fn. 120) From 1408 until the 17th century
the ownership of this estate has not been traced, but
a tenement called Hastings was later included in the
estate called GREAT SANDPITS. (fn. 121) In 1658
William Hurdman owned and occupied a chief
messuage called Sandpits, and his estate seems to
have included a tenement that had belonged to the
Slaughter family in the 16th century and afterwards
to William Francombe, one of a family with many
properties in Tirley. William Hurdman was dead by
1697, when his wife Margaret conveyed the estate to
their son George. George mortgaged the estate the
same year, (fn. 122) and in 1716 sold it to Abraham Griffin.
Abraham Griffin died in 1762, and by 1765 the
estate belonged to Edward Griffin. In 1794 Edward
Griffin made a settlement of the estate, (fn. 123) apparently
to facilitate its sale to George William Coventry,
Earl of Coventry (fn. 124) (d. 1809), with whose manor of
Tirley it became merged. The house at Great Sandpits had 6 hearths in 1672; (fn. 125) it was probably built
in the mid-17th century, as a T-shaped house of
brick with two stories and cellars. The central, fluted
chimney-stack contains 6 flues, the windows have
stone mullions and transoms, and there is a continuous stone dripmould above the ground-floor
windows. The stone doorway has stop-moulded
jambs and a four-centred head with carved spandrels.
The manor of THE HAW belonged to the abbey
of St. Denis as part of Deerhurst Priory, and
descended with the priory to Tewkesbury Abbey. (fn. 126)
With the manor belonged the great tithes of Tirley,
which were regarded as an appropriated rectory. (fn. 127) In
1540 the Crown leased the manor of HAW AND
TIRLEY to George Throckmorton of Deerhurst, (fn. 128)
a Master in Chancery, who in 1543 received a grant
of the manor in fee and a licence to alienate it to his
nephew, Sir Thomas Throckmorton of Tortworth, (fn. 129) who already held Tirley manor. The Haw
manor passed with Tirley manor to Sir Baynham
Throckmorton, who sold it with Tirley manor to
Lord Coventry in 1632. (fn. 130) Thereafter the two manors
descended together, (fn. 131) and the great tithes belonged
to Lord Coventry in 1798, when at inclosure he
received 77 a. in their place. (fn. 132) In the early 17th
century, however, Sir William Throckmorton had
alienated parts of his estate, (fn. 133) and John Bennett,
described as of the Haw in 1623, held at his death
in 1634 a chief house with one yardland in the Haw,
in socage, as of the manors of Haw and Tirley.
Bennett's estate may have represented the manorhouse and home farm of the Haw manor. John
Bennett was succeeded by his son of the same name, (fn. 134)
who was recorded in 1659 and 1664 (fn. 135) but not in
1672. (fn. 136) His estate belonged to William Francombe
c. 1705, (fn. 137) and c. 1734 a Mrs. Francombe had the
house and estate (fn. 138) that afterwards came to Jeremiah
Hawkins. Hawkins was a churchwarden of Tirley in
1785 (fn. 139) and died in 1835. (fn. 140) His great-niece and
ultimate legatee, Louisa, Marchioness Guadagni,
sold the estate in 1873 to the Revd. Ralph Bourne
Baker. Baker acquired several estates in Tirley, (fn. 141)
which in 1893 were owned by William Meath-Baker, (fn. 142)
of Hasfield Court. In 1964 the Hasfield Court estate
owned the land of Haw farm, but the farm-house
was sold separately c. 1955. (fn. 143) The house incorporates
part of a timber-framed house of the late 16th or
early 17th century; the parlour wing at the north
end was added or rebuilt in the early 18th century,
when the rest of the house was cased in brick and
given a new staircase, sash windows, and a doorcase
with wooden fluted Doric pilasters, enriched frieze,
and segmental pediment. Part of the south end of
the house was destroyed by fire in the mid-20th
century. In the garden is a square brick gazebo of
the early 18th century with a carved wooden doorcase.
The Deerhurst Priory estate appears to have
included the house and land known as TIRLEY
HILL, and formerly as Hill House or Hill Farm.
It was perhaps this estate that in 1625 was known as
Newballs and belonged to the Powell family. By his
marriage with Mary, daughter of James Gittos,
Vicar of Tirley 1664–80, Joshua Dipper ultimately
acquired Hill House; he was succeeded in turn by
his son Joseph (d. c. 1768), Joseph's son John (d.
c. 1805), and John's son John (d. 1818). Diana,
widow of the last John Dipper, afterwards married
Edward Barnes and died in 1859, having been a
lunatic for 35 years. The estate then appears to have
passed to Sarah Elizabeth, daughter of the last John
Dipper's sister and wife of William Browne, (fn. 144) and
to have been sold to Timothy Pitcher. From Pitcher's
wife Elizabeth (fn. 145) it passed to a grandson, John
Phillips Fowler, whose son, of the same name,
owned and farmed Tirley Hill farm, the second
largest in the parish, in 1964. (fn. 146) The house includes
a 17th-century timber-framed building with brick
filling, and was enlarged in the early 18th century
and later. In the garden is a square brick gazebo of
the early 18th century, rather like that at Haw
Farm.
Another estate that was in Deerhurst hundred (fn. 147)
and therefore is likely to have formed part of the
Haw manor was that of CUMBERWORTH or
GREAT CUMBERWOOD. Cumberworth was
recorded in the year 972, (fn. 148) and Henry of Cumberworth witnessed a grant of land at Tirley Ellings in
1345. (fn. 149) Ownership of the estate has not been found
recorded before 1627, and Great Cumberwood may
have been another part severed from the Throckmortons' estate in the early 17th century. John
Browne, who built the house at Great Cumberwood
in 1627 (fn. 150) and was described as of Cumberworth in
1635 and 1650, (fn. 151) died in 1656 and was succeeded in
turn by another John Browne (d. 1681), (fn. 152) by Henry
Browne (d. 1688), (fn. 153) and by Charles Browne (fl.
1698, 1723). (fn. 154) In the early 19th century the coheirs
of a member of the Browne family sold Great
Cumberwood to William Newman. In 1810 the
estate passed to Newman's son David, on whose
death it was sold (fn. 155) and apparently divided. (fn. 156) The
house and c. 150 a. were owned in 1964 by Mr. R.
E. Gilder. (fn. 157) The house built in 1627 is of two stories
and attics with three gables on the west front. The
timber framing was later rough-cast. The house contained 6 hearths in 1672. (fn. 158) About 1800 the south front
was rebuilt in brick, with sash windows and a parapet,
but a 17th-century panelled room with a Jacobean
overmantel and a staircase survived behind this front.
All the old windows were replaced c. 1800 or later.
The estate called LITTLE CUMBERWOOD
passed through the ownership of the Francombe
family (1634), the Phelps family (1653–99), and the
Edgecombe family. It passed to Balliol College,
Oxford, c. 1737 under the will of John Edgecombe.
The college sold the farm, comprising 36 a. in Tirley
and 21 a. in Chaceley, in 1919 to its tenant, Thomas
Hopkins, (fn. 159) and in 1931 it became part of the New
Hall estate in Chaceley. (fn. 160) The farm-house, a small
early 18th-century building (fn. 161) of brick, was derelict
in 1964.
Economic History.
Although Tirley was
divided between two townships and comprised the
three chief manors of Tirley, Haw, and Rye, for
agricultural purposes it appears to have been a single
unit. In the 16th century it was not possible to define
the bounds of Rye manor because the land lay intermingled with other estates, (fn. 162) and the same was
apparently true of the other manors. Tirley manor
had a large demesne farm in the 15th century (fn. 163) and
Rye manor a small one in the 16th. (fn. 164) Haw manor
c. 1300 contained hardly any demesne, and the whole
manor was understocked. (fn. 165) Until the 17th century
all three manors had copyhold tenants, and Rye and
Haw also had a fairly high proportion of land held
by free tenants. (fn. 166) Some copyhold in Haw manor had
been enfranchised by 1615, (fn. 167) and most of the copyhold land seems to have become free soon afterwards,
perhaps as the result of the sale of lands of Tirley
manor, and the fragmentation of Rye manor. In
Tirley manor some copyhold land remained in 1729,
when the custom, as in 1534, was that it was held for
three lives, widows having right of freebench. (fn. 168)
The changes in tenure, possibly resulting in a
break-down of manorial organization, were accompanied by a decline in arable farming. Until the
early 17th century there was a fairly high proportion
of arable land. An estate of 140 a. in the Haw in 1472
included 100 a. of arable; (fn. 169) of the 350 a. of Rye
manor in 1506 200 a. were arable; (fn. 170) in Tirley manor,
200 a. of 250 a. comprising the demesne were arable
in 1436, (fn. 171) and 500 a. of 1,600 a. — apparently the
whole manor and including extensive rough pasture
— in 1499. (fn. 172) The arable land lay in at least nine open
fields. Northfield, which was divided into upper and
lower parts, Southfield or Churchfield, which was
also divided in two, Bradley field, and Harley field,
lay north and north-west of Tirley Street. Ashfield
or Dumbleton field, Redhill field, and Nethers field,
which was divided into upper and lower parts, lay
south of the main road. Ducknall field and Greenfield have not been located. Three others named in
the 16th century, Tilers field, Haw field and Collenes
field, may have been the same as, or included in,
fields already mentioned. The ridges or selions
within the fields were small: many were stated to be
¼ a., others were smaller. No estate is recorded as
including land in all the fields, and most estates had
land in either two or four fields. That may indicate
either a former two-course rotation in arable farming,
or a fragmentation of holdings. Certainly the freehold estates recorded in the 17th and 18th centuries
were small, many being 60 a. and less. (fn. 173)
In that period most estates included a high proportion of meadow, usually lying in small pieces and
apparently uninclosed. (fn. 174) Larger pieces of inclosed
pasture, up to 20 a. in size, (fn. 175) are likely to have been
former open-field arable. In 1729 it was said that
there was sufficient inclosed land for any man's
convenience. (fn. 176) Some arable had been converted to
pasture by 1678, but remained uninclosed. (fn. 177) Several
pieces were not merely converted to pasture but were
planted with fruit-trees. (fn. 178) Apple-growing and cidermaking became an important part of the economy
of the parish. Orchard land formed a high proportion
of Wigwood farm in 1808, (fn. 179) and there had been
nearly as many orchards as tenants in Rye manor
in 1591. (fn. 180) There was a cider-mill house at Tirley
Hill from 1677 to 1787, (fn. 181) and the owner of a
different estate was described as a cider merchant in
1800. (fn. 182)
Apart from arable, meadow, inclosed pasture, and
orchards, the parish contained a large area of rough
pasture on Corse Lawn. It is not clear whether all
the parishioners, or even all the landowners in the
parish, had commoning rights there. References in
deeds and surveys of land in Tirley to common of
pasture are rare, but this may have been because the
right was unrestricted and needed no written
evidence. In 1591 the tenants of Rye manor were
stated to have common on Corse Lawn for all kinds
of commonable animals with no limit on the
numbers. (fn. 183) At inclosure in 1798 small allotments
were made to replace common belonging to cottages
with apparently no land. (fn. 184) Common on Corse Lawn
was presumably represented by the 500 a. of
common included in Tirley manor in 1499, (fn. 185) and
by the 600 a. of furze and heath conveyed with the
manor in 1632. (fn. 186) The lord of Tirley manor spoke of
all his sheep on Corse Lawn in 1532, (fn. 187) and in 1707
there was a building called the Sheephouse not far
from Tirley Court. (fn. 188) The rarity of references to
sheep in Tirley in the surviving records is presumably
comparable with the rarity of references to common
of pasture.
Only just over half the parish remained uninclosed in 1798, when, under an Act of 1795, 1,026
a. were allotted by the commissioners, excluding
86 a. of old inclosures that were exchanged under the
Act. Of the newly inclosed land the vicar received
191 a. for tithes, and the Earl of Coventry 402 a.:
237 a. for his common, 77 a. for tithes, 41 a. for land
held of him by lessees and other tenants, and 47 a. for
right of the soil. The large amount for right of the
soil is explained by the high proportion of waste in
the newly inclosed land. The commissioners made
5 allotments of between 25 a. and 65 a., 11 of between
4 a. and 20 a., and 21 of under 4 a., all in lieu of land;
in addition they made 19 allotments of under 2 a.
in lieu of rights of common only. (fn. 189) The inclosure
was an expensive one; it was said to have cost
£4,500, or £4 10s. an acre, exclusive of fences and
buildings, but nevertheless to have been profitable. (fn. 190)
After inclosure the farming remained mixed. On
one farm in 1806 the stock included 25 cows and a
bull, 69 sheep, 4 cart-horses, 15 pigs, wheat, peas,
beans, barley, and hay, cheese, potatoes, cider, and
cider equipment. (fn. 191) The proportion of arable land
was low: it was reported that most of the land was
pasture and meadow, (fn. 192) and in 1801 only 351 a. in the
parish were returned as sown, two-thirds of it with
wheat. (fn. 193) From the late 19th century the amount of
arable land decreased: it had fallen to 210 a. by
1901, (fn. 194) and by 1933 was under 100 a. (fn. 195) In 1964 the
proportion of arable land was higher, particularly
in the western part of the parish. A notable change
by that time was the decline in orchards. Though
still numerous, they were not nearly so extensive as
25 years earlier, and were not so well maintained. (fn. 196)
The number of farmers decreased gradually after
inclosure. In 1831 there were 19 agricultural
occupiers who employed labour and 7 who did not. (fn. 197)
Sixteen farmers were recorded in 1863, 17 in 1906,
and 13 — of whom 6 had over 150 a. — in 1923
and 1931. (fn. 198) In 1964 there were 8 farms of 40 a. and
upwards, of which one was over 400 a. and three
others were 150 a. or more; in addition, at least
3 farms centred outside the parish had land in
Tirley. (fn. 199)
A map of the county in 1824 marks a water-mill
beside the main road near the Haw. (fn. 200) As the watercourse there was primarily a drain (fn. 201) it is not a likely
mill site, and the map-maker may have marked a
mill in error for the sluice there. There was a windmill in Tirley in 1287, (fn. 202) and Richard the millward
was recorded in 1358. (fn. 203) In 1632 there was a windmill
in the Throckmortons' manor; (fn. 204) c. 1734 a windmill
stood on the windmill knoll (fn. 205) that has given a name
to the group of houses at Tirley Knowle. (fn. 206) There is
also a tradition of a windmill that stood in front of
the house called Red Castle. (fn. 207) A millwright was living
in Tirley in 1658. (fn. 208)
The river once provided employment for a
number of inhabitants. A fisherman was drowned
at the Haw passage c. 1245 and another was arrested
at the Rye c. 1285. (fn. 209) Three fishermen and a boatman
were recorded in 1702–6, (fn. 210) a trowman in 1738, a
waterman in 1753, and a boatbuilder in 1775. (fn. 211) The
19th-century register of baptisms records boatowners, fishermen, boatmen, and watermen, (fn. 212) who
continued to be named in directories up to the First
World War. (fn. 213) Shoemakers are recorded in 1221 (fn. 214)
and from 1623, (fn. 215) weavers and tailors from 1608,
but none of these trades seems to have survived the
19th century in Tirley. Carpenters (from 1608) (fn. 216)
and masons or builders (from 1694) (fn. 217) are recorded
up to the First World War. Blacksmiths (from
1672) (fn. 218) and wheelwrights continued their trade in
Tirley until the mid-20th century. (fn. 219)
In 1695 a surgeon at Tirley was licensed, (fn. 220) and a
physician was living there in 1711. (fn. 221) A large distillery
stood south-west of Haw Green c. 1734; (fn. 222) there was
a distiller in 1751; (fn. 223) and the large malthouse near
the Haw Bridge Inn was built in the late 18th
century. The making and marketing of cider in the
parish have been mentioned above. In 1811 there
were 9 families supported mainly by trade and
manufacture, representing 1 in 7 of the population,
and the proportion increased in the next 20 years. (fn. 224)
There was a village shop by 1824, (fn. 225) and the
number of shops rose to 7 in 1870. There was, however, only one in 1914 and 1964. (fn. 226)
Local Government.
Since it lay in two
hundreds, the parish was divided between two
tithings or townships. In the late 14th century there
was said to have been also a separate tithingman for
Rye manor, (fn. 227) but the Rye is not otherwise recorded
as a separate tithing. In the early 16th century the
part of the parish in Westminster hundred had a
tithingman only, and no constable, (fn. 228) and in 1716
one man was serving as constable for the two
constituent townships of the parish. (fn. 229) By the mid18th century constables for both parts of the parish
were appointed in the court of Tirley manor, which
by then was also serving as the court for Haw
manor. There are records of the court of Tirley
manor for 1545, 1582, and 1583, of Rye manor for
1560, 1562, and 1568. Extracts of the court rolls of
Tirley and Haw survive for the period 1633–1773,
and court rolls for 1777–1935, recording in the last
years only presentments for not making suit of
court. (fn. 230)
The Tirley Elm estate, though later used as an
ordinary eleemosynary charity, appears to have been
intended to relieve the weight of parochial obligation. (fn. 231) In 1773 there was a scheme by which the
poor of Tirley were to be maintained, at the expense
of the parish, in the workhouse at Winchcombe; (fn. 232)
it is not clear whether it was ever carried through,
and if it was, it was no longer being worked in the
early 19th century. (fn. 233) Parish expenditure on the poor
did not increase, as it did in so many parishes, in the
40 years after 1775. It was in fact lower in 1813–15
than in the late 18th century, and the rate in Tirley
in 1802–3 was unusually low. (fn. 234) An increase in
expenditure on the poor occurred c. 1830, which
made the figure for Tirley more nearly typical of the
area. (fn. 235) Tirley became part of the Tewkesbury Poor
Law Union formed in 1835. (fn. 236) It was transferred
from the Tewkesbury to the Gloucester Rural
District in 1935. (fn. 237)
Church.
Tirley was originally part of Deerhurst
parish, and the great tithes of Tirley belonged to
Deerhurst Priory. (fn. 238) There is likely to have been a
church or chapel of ease in Tirley c. 1220, when John
the priest of Tirley witnessed a deed, (fn. 239) and a
chaplain called Bernard of Tirley, who held a free
tenement in Tirley in 1221, (fn. 240) may have been
associated with it. Two chaplains, one described as
of Tirley and the other as of Rye (Eia), witnessed a
deed c. 1285. (fn. 241) That may suggest that the chapel
of Rye, mentioned in 1291 and 1341, was distinct
from the church or chapel of Tirley, though the
absence of any mention of Tirley church at those
dates is an indication to the contrary. The freestone
arches at Wigwood may come from the fabric either
of the chapel of Rye or of Tirley church; equally,
they may have been taken to Wigwood from elsewhere and have no connexion with either. Whether
the chapel of Rye was the same as Tirley church or
not, the pension of 5s. that it owed to Monmouth
Priory (fn. 242) links it with the lords of the Rye manor.
No mention of the pension after 1341 has been
found. (fn. 243) In 1502 the Crown assigned to the Abbot
of Westminster the issues and profits of several
chapels, including those of Rye and Haw. (fn. 244) Haw
chapel is not otherwise recorded, and Rye chapel at
no later date. By this date Tirley church was a
vicarage.
Tirley church had an endowed living by 1316, the
date of the first known institution to the vicarage. (fn. 245)
The right to present to the vicarage belonged to the
abbey of St. Denis (and later to Tewkesbury Abbey)
and was exercised, when it was not in the king's
hands by reason of war, by the Prior of Deerhurst. (fn. 246)
After the Dissolution the Crown retained the
advowson. (fn. 247) In 1934 the vicarage was united with
the rectory of Hasfield, and the Lord Chancellor presented to the united benefice on alternate vacancies. (fn. 248)
The vicarage was endowed with tithes, but had no
glebe apart from the site of the vicarage house. (fn. 249) In
1535 the tithes were let at farm for £9 6s. 8d. a year. (fn. 250)
In the 1630's a modus was established for the
payment of the vicarial tithes, and it remained
effective until 1705 (fn. 251) and probably until inclosure in
1798: the vicarage was valued at £40 a year in
1650, (fn. 252) c. 1738, (fn. 253) and c. 1775. (fn. 254) At inclosure the vicar
received 193 a. in place of his tithes, (fn. 255) and the value
of the living increased to £375 in 1829 (fn. 256) and over
£400 in the 1850's. (fn. 257) In 1964 the incumbent retained
c. 35 a. of glebe in Tirley. (fn. 258) The vicarage house stood
immediately next to the churchyard until the 19th
century. (fn. 259) In 1613 it contained three small rooms on
the ground floor, and two bedrooms above; the
bedrooms were apparently in the roof, for in 1705
the vicarage house was said to be three bays of
building one story high. The three bays presumably
corresponded to the three rooms described in 1613. (fn. 260)
In 1827 the house was said to be too small, and in
1832 a new house was built 150 yards further north. (fn. 261)
In 1342 the king ordered the arrest of William of
Hampnett and his adherents: under colour of a papal
provision William had taken possession of the
vicarage and held it by force of arms. (fn. 262) In 1535 the
vicar was also Rector of Hasfield, (fn. 263) and in the
preceding years Tirley was served by a curate. (fn. 264)
Hugh Dowsing, who was vicar in 1540 and 1551,
was a former religious (fn. 265) who appears to have
belonged to a family settled in Tirley. (fn. 266) His successor
was deprived in 1554 because he was married, and
the next vicar in 1558 for contumacy. (fn. 267) Robert
Gladwin, vicar 1568–1618, though neither a
graduate nor a preacher, was a Latinist and a
'sufficient scholar', but his parishioners complained
of his unseemly language and his wife's behaviour
during services. (fn. 268) Richard Beeston, vicar from
1639, (fn. 269) in 1648 subscribed the Presbyterian
Gloucestershire Ministers' Testimony, (fn. 270) but was not
afterwards a nonconformist. (fn. 271) In the 18th century,
Charles Parker, vicar 1738–88, was a pluralist who
lived at Hasfield but himself held a service at Tirley
each Sunday, (fn. 272) and Charles Sandiford, vicar 1788–
1827, lived on his other benefice at Awre and
employed a curate for Tirley. (fn. 273) J. F. Hone, vicar
1827–88, surpassed both his predecessors with the
length of his incumbency, and lived away from
Tirley for only part of it. (fn. 274)
In 1751 Jane and Mary Atwood gave land in Tirley
to pay the incumbent for preaching a sermon there
every year on Ascension Day. (fn. 275)
Tirley church was called ST. MATTHEW'S in
1514, (fn. 276) in 1750, (fn. 277) and in the earlier 19th century, (fn. 278)
but the name ST. MICHAEL'S, which was used in
the early 18th century and c. 1775, (fn. 279) became the
accepted one in the 1890's. (fn. 280) It comprises chancel,
nave, west tower, and porch. It is built of a shaly
stone that has weathered badly and appears to come
from a local quarry; the dressings are of limestone,
and the roofs tiled. The tower is rough-cast, and the
chancel and nave had stucco on the outside in the
mid-19th century, (fn. 281) but the masonry was afterwards
laid bare.
The plan of the church, together with the tower
and one of the south windows of the nave, (fn. 282) survives
from the 14th century. The tower arch is of two
plain chamfered orders. The chancel arch, which is
similar, may have been built at the same time; so
may the trussed rafter roofs of the chancel and nave,
which, however, were rebuilt in 1894. In the thickness of the wall on the north side of the chancel arch
are the remains of a spiral stair to a rood-loft. The
tower is of three stages, the top one being separated
by a string-course and stepped back. The lowest
stage has a west window of three lights with
reticulated tracery. The top stage, which has battlements and angle pinnacles and a trefoil-headed light
in each face, may have been added, with the western
buttresses, in the 15th century.
The chancel had a three-light 14th-century east
window, which has been rebuilt. South of it is a
small trefoil-headed piscina. Four windows in the
nave and the square-headed windows in the chancel
were added in the 15th century; in the mid-19th
century those in the chancel appeared to have had
no mullions, (fn. 283) though in 1964 they had mullions and
tracery. In 1563 the glazing of the church, and in
1572 the roof, were presented as out of repair. (fn. 284) In
1733 £67 was spent on repairing the church and
tower. (fn. 285) In 1737 a gallery was built; (fn. 286) it was removed
apparently in the late 19th century. The practice of
strawing the church twice a year continued into the
19th century. (fn. 287) The church was restored 1892–4. (fn. 288)
The inside of the church is whitewashed, and over
the chancel arch are traces of a wall-painting. The
timber south porch of c. 1600 was restored in 1964.
The church has a number of floor-slabs and mural
monuments, some of elaborate design, to members
of local landowning families. (fn. 289) The font is tubshaped and plain, apparently of the 12th or 13th
century. In the nave is a large ancient iron-bound
chest standing on ancient trestles. The plate includes
a chalice of 1640, a paten of 1704, and a pewter
flagon of 1675. (fn. 290) In 1668 the 'great bell' was rehung, (fn. 291)
but in 1680 it was agreed that all four bells should
be taken down to be recast as five by Alexander
Rigby of Cheltenham, who was also to recast the
sanctus bell. (fn. 292) In 1785–7 John and Charles Rudhall
provided six new or recast bells, one of which was
recast in 1897. (fn. 293) A new clock, built by a local blacksmith from scrap metal, was put up in 1932. (fn. 294) The
registers begin in 1653 and are virtually complete. (fn. 295)
Land producing 20s. 6d. a year for the use of the
church was recorded in 1535 (fn. 296) but not subsequently.
The sum of 4s. 6d. a year given for a light was being
distributed in 1549 to the poor. (fn. 297) Both these charities
may afterwards have been merged in the Tirley Elm
estate charity.
Nonconformity.
Fifteen Protestant nonconformists were enumerated in Tirley in 1676. (fn. 298)
Several of them were Quakers, who were present in
Tirley in 1660. (fn. 299) By 1670 there was a Quaker meeting
there, which in 1673 was involved in a disagreement
with the meeting at Ashleworth. (fn. 300) William Arnold's
house was licensed as a dissenters' meeting in 1689,
perhaps for Quakers, and a Quaker meeting-house
was expressly licensed in 1690. (fn. 301) By 1709 there was a
decline in the enthusiasm of the Quakers in Tirley,
and in 1714 collections from Tirley for the Quarterly
Meeting ceased. (fn. 302) Three Quakers were enumerated
in Tirley in 1735 and one in 1743. In 1735 there were
also one papist, one Presbyterian, and one Baptist,
of whom only the Baptist was mentioned in 1743. (fn. 303)
A house had been licensed for Presbyterian meetings
in 1702, (fn. 304) but no later evidence of it has been found.
In 1816 buildings belonging to Josiah Hopkins
were registered for dissenting worship, and in 1821
a 'temple' built on land belonging to him was
similarly registered. (fn. 305) The temple was the Wesleyan
Methodist chapel which in 1826 was said to be
disused, (fn. 306) but was in use again in 1851. (fn. 307) It remained
privately owned, and after the owner's death services
were held for a while in a cottage. A new chapel was
opened in 1887, on a site in Tirley Street just below
that of the old chapel. It is a small building of brick
with stone dressings, and in 1964 it continued to
be used for Methodist worship. (fn. 308)
A room registered for nonconformist worship in
1837 was replaced two years later by a chapel, (fn. 309)
called the Lower Chapel, in contrast to the Upper
Chapel of the Methodists. In 1851 it was used by
Bible Christians; (fn. 310) no later record of it has been
found.
Schools.
In 1634 and 1635 Ralph Wallis was
presented for teaching a school without licence, as
was William Williams in 1636. (fn. 311) In 1698 John
Edgecombe B.A. was licensed to teach children in
Tirley. (fn. 312) In 1816 there was a dissenting Sunday
school there, (fn. 313) but in 1818 there was said to be no
school at all in the parish. (fn. 314) Presumably any children
attending school then went, as in 1826, to the day
school at Hasfield for both parishes. (fn. 315) By 1833 there
was a Church of England school in Tirley with an
attendance of 40 on weekdays and 55 on Sundays. It
was supported by an endowment producing £5 a
year, by subscription, and by an annual sermon.
The children were taught by a man and his wife. (fn. 316)
In 1842 part of the glebe was conveyed for the site
of a new National school, (fn. 317) which was built the same
year. (fn. 318) The capital sum of the endowment helped
to pay for the building. (fn. 319) In 1846 there were 56
children in the school, apart from those who went
on Sundays only, but two small dame schools still
survived. (fn. 320) The new National school was built of the
same sort of stone as the church, and included a
teacher's house. A classroom was added in 1896. (fn. 321)
Average attendance was 43 in 1863, when fees of 1d.
and 1½d. a week were paid, (fn. 322) 58 in 1897, (fn. 323) and 36 in
1938. (fn. 324) By 1964 it was a 'controlled' school with an
attendance of c. 60. (fn. 325)
Charities.
The Tirley Elm estate charity
originated before 1600, when it owned a house called
the Church House and parcels of land. The income
was to be spent on the repair of the parish roads, in
relief of military levies made on the parish, and on
other parochial uses. (fn. 326) By 1705 the estate was
represented by a rent of £10 a year for the poor,
charged on houses and land in Tirley. (fn. 327) To this
charity Benjamin Bateman, vicar 1707–19, (fn. 328) added
the sum of £20, which was invested in land, and in
1729 Susannah Gwyn gave 4 a. in Tirley. After
inclosure the estate comprised 4 cottages and 18½
a., and produced an average of £32 a year, which was
distributed to the poor in coal and cash. (fn. 329) In 1853–5
the gross income was c. £70 a year, of which c. £30
was spent on coal, and c. £20 distributed in cash. (fn. 330)
In 1911 the estate included 14 cottages and 20 a.,
producing £63 a year gross. (fn. 331) In the 1960's the
trustees distributed c. £60 a year in cash, but the
greater part of the income was spent on the maintenance of the cottages, which provided free or cheap
housing for those in need. (fn. 332)
Joseph Millard (d. 1727) gave a rent-charge of £5
for buying clothes for five poor men. From 1787 to
1790 and from 1792 until the 1820's the money
was not paid. (fn. 333) Miss Emily Browne by her will
proved 1911 gave £250 stock and a pair of cottages
to the parish. The income of both charities was
applied in 1964 with that of the Tirley Elm estate. (fn. 334)