PUBLIC BUILDINGS
The Castle.
Though technically outside the
Borough until Chesterton was taken into it in 1911,
the castle (fn. 1) dominated it physically and administratively for centuries. It was used in emergencies as a
military stronghold, periodically as the place for the
county courts and therefore for parliamentary elections and judicial assizes, and continuously as the
county prison. That it was also the sheriff's administrative headquarters is attested, amongst other
evidence, by a unique passage in the Barnwell Book.
The writer says that the list of rents and dues compiled by him (about 1240) rendered it unnecessary
for the prior or his tenants 'to go to the castle to
scrutinize the sheriff's roll there'. (fn. 2)
The Norman castle, erected in 1068, was of the
motte and bailey type. It covered some 5 acres; 27
houses were destroyed to clear the bailey, and the
motte, which rises to some 80 ft. above the river,
was an artificial mound within which Anglo-Saxon
gravestones have been found. (fn. 3) It is probable that
the earliest structure was of wood, but presumably
a stone erection replaced it before the time in the
12th century when the pipe rolls record expenditure
on works there. This expenditure amounted to £43
in 1156–77, £23 under Richard I, and £60 under
John. (fn. 4)
The strategic importance of the castle diminished
after 1215; in the records of Henry III's reign it is
mentioned almost entirely in connexion with royal
government and justice. It played no part in the
campaigns of the Barons' Wars, nor was it, apparently, in a condition to be used for a royal residence.
Neither Henry III in 1258 and 1267 nor the justices
who held the inquiries into rebels' lands in 1268–70
stayed there. (fn. 5) Edward I, however, determined to
make it an efficient stronghold. The Exchequer
records (fn. 6) tell the detailed story of the way in which
an up-to-date building was constructed between
1286 and 1296. This castle had a curtain wall, and a
moat, fed by water from a spring in the north-west
corner of the bailey; (fn. 7) a great hall; a gatehouse with
a barbican; and five towers, including the great
tower on the mound. (fn. 8) The particulars of the materials used, (fn. 9) the transport, the provenance of the
labourers and their rates of pay, are of much interest.
Building went on steadily in 1286–9 and was then
suspended; on 4 October 1291 Edward ordered an
immediate resumption of work. (fn. 10) In 1293 he spent
two nights in the castle, presumably to inspect the
works; the first and last king to stay there. (fn. 11) From
the military point of view, the subsequent history of
the castle hardly seems to justify the £2,525 that
Edward spent on it. (fn. 12) The camera armigerorum (fn. 13)
cannot have been in constant use, though the castleguard money was regularly exacted. (fn. 14) Architecturally, the gatehouse, the only portion surviving by
1606, and known to us through Cotman's fine drawings, testifies to the quality of Edward's work; to the
Cambridge folk of the 17th and 18th centuries it was
'the castle', and a French visitor in 1672 described it
as dominating the town. (fn. 15) But in fact its survival was
due to its use as a prison.

Cambridge castle; suggested plan
Orders concerning repairs and upkeep continue
through the following centuries; it is interesting
that those of 1331 are directed not to the sheriff but
to the Mayor. (fn. 16) An inquest into the defective state
of the walls and towers and houses was held in
1367, (fn. 17) and two tons of stone were purchased to
mend the castle walls in 1523. (fn. 18) This must refer to
the curtain wall. Eighty years earlier the practice of
using the castle as a quarry had been initiated by
Henry VI, who authorized the taking of stone from
the great hall for the building of King's College.
Later grants were made for the building of Sawston
Hall, of Emmanuel College and of Magdalene
College. Unlicensed plunder was responsible for
other losses. (fn. 19) Humble folk were in the habit of
'digging down' the bank to the south and west and
building their cottages on the slopes or even in the
moat, (fn. 20) and in the early 17th century lawsuits disputing the ownership of such holdings (fn. 21) and the
herbage rights over the waste slopes to the south
produced depositions giving a number of topographical details. Not only squatters' rights, but the
rights of the lord of Chesterton manor, within whose
bounds the castle lay, were questioned by the Crown.
The castle site had come to be little more than a
neglected area occupied by a few local government
buildings when in 1643 it once more acquired
military significance. Fifteen houses were cleared
away, and the earthworks to the north and west were
remodelled according to the latest military science.
Brick barracks were built on the site of Edward's
great hall. According to Bowtell, who surveyed the
works in 1785, 'three strong, though irregular
bastions' were added on the verge of the Norman
ditch, measuring 17½ ft. in height and 70 in breadth
at the base, made of gault and firm white clay. (fn. 22)
But in 1647, by vote of both Houses, the works
were 'slighted' (fn. 23) and in course of time the Cromwellian barracks became in part a Bridewell for
petty offenders, in part the gaoler's house, until the
new gaol was built in 1862.
Since 1647 the site has served purely civilian purposes. From the days before the Conquest when the
shire moots were held on the Maiden Borough, the
old name for the Roman Camp, (fn. 24) the county courts
assembled there and the county elections, and indeed
for many years the Borough elections, were held
there. It is called the Shire Hill in 1626. (fn. 25) Soame
Jenyns declared at the time of the election of 1780
that 'he only escaped by accident from being
trampled to death in the castle yard by a mob of all
the sectaries in the county'. (fn. 26) In 1797 Pitt wrote to
the Duchess of Rutland urging her to see that 'our
friends' turn up in force at the meeting in the
Castle Yard, to oppose any proposals put forward
by the Yorke interest. (fn. 27) It was presumably the building of the County Gaol in 1807 that led to the county
elections, like those for the borough after 1832, being
held on Parker's Piece. (fn. 28)
The Shire House.
The king's justices visiting
a county sat in the county court, (fn. 28) so that a Sessions
House was needed on the hill. Presumably the
Edwardian hall served the purpose so long as its
roof was on, but a Shire House, with a small court
for criminal cases and a larger one for civil cases,
was built in 1572 by Roger Lord North, who also
built a small house for the juries to sit in. (fn. 29) Hamond's
plan in 1592, which shows the gallows in the depression below the Castle Mound, represents the Common Law Court as having an arched portico
supported by four columns; Bowtell says it was of
wood, on a brick foundation. It served the justices
of assize until 1747, when the Shire Hall in Cambridge Market Place was built. The new Shire
Hall stood in front of the Town Hall—a position
which had, apparently, been coveted for it by North
in 1571. (fn. 30) It was elevated on pillars 11 ft. high, (fn. 31) so
that the market stalls could continue to occupy the
ground below. In this building the courts were held,
the county authorities being granted the use of the
Town Hall and its parlours as required. (fn. 32) But, as
Carter said in 1747, (fn. 33) the Shire House in the Market
Place was 'not very commodious', and in 1776 Ewin
thought it ought to be pulled down. (fn. 34) Though the
addition of a spacious gallery with other alterations
in 1777 was said to add 'greater decorum and ease'
to the conduct of the assizes, (fn. 35) the courts finally'
moved back to Castle Hill. In 1842 the Gatehouse
was pulled down to make room for the Shire Hall
designed by T. H. Wyatt and D. Brandon, in which
the assizes were held. (fn. 36) The Shire House in the
Market Place became part of the Town Hall. (fn. 37) The
Local Government Act of 1888 meant a need for
more extensive offices, and a fine County Hall was
opened in Hobson Street in 1914. (fn. 38) This in turn
proved inadequate, (fn. 39) and in 1931–2 a New County
Hall designed by H. H. Dunn was erected on the
Castle Yard site, with the materials and on the
space released by the destruction of the County
Gaol.
County Gaol.
As the Eyre rolls report, there
were often escapes into sanctuary at All Saints by
the Castle, St. Giles, or Chesterton Church. (fn. 40) It
would seem that in the Edwardian castle the tower
to the east of the mound contained the prison, under
the Constables' Chamber. (fn. 41) In the 14th century the
castle gaol received not only county prisoners but
also those committed by the Vice-Chancellor, though
the Borough protested that this was against their
liberties. (fn. 42) The grant of the castle 'saving the gaol' to
the Earl of Cambridge in 1340–1 indicated its dual
character; it is expressly stated that the sheriff is to
have free access to the gaol at the gate of the castle. (fn. 43)
Thenceforth the gatehouse was to be the castle gaol
until the end of the 18th century. By the 16th century the office of gaoler was clearly distinct from that
of sheriff and several indentures of appointment are
extant. (fn. 44) The upper floor of the gatehouse came to
be reserved for superior prisoners, notably debtors;
criminals were housed below. (fn. 45) In the 17th century
both Roman Catholics associated with the Gunpowder Plot and Protestant dissenters were imprisoned there. (fn. 46) One of the more notable dissenters
was Francis Holcroft, ex-fellow of Clare and nonconformist preacher, detained there 1663–72, who
had a gentleman's agreement with the gaoler whereby
he was let out after dark on Saturday nights, on the
understanding that he was back before daylight on
Monday, so that he could minister to his pastor-less
coreligionists in the county. (fn. 47) Buck's print of 1730
shows the gatehouse in good repair with the gables
of the gaoler's house visible above the battlements.
In 1759 the Cambridge Chronicle relates how the
criminals in the lower gaol filed off their irons, broke
fourteen locks and a massive bar across the door, and
had almost escaped when the debtors in the upper
prison heard them and gave the alarm. (fn. 48) In January
1776 Ewin visited the gaol on behalf of Lord Hardwicke, who had heard reports that it was very cold
and had sent in some coals. There were then nine
debtors and four felons in the gaol itself and one
inmate of the House of Correction or Bridewell.
Three of the debtors were breakfasting with the
gaoler's family (next door to the Bridewell), and the
other six had a warm room with a good fire, whilst
some of the felons had been admitted to the House of
Correction so as to be warmed by the gaoler's fire. (fn. 49)
Howard visited the gaol and the Bridewell soon
after, and reported well of them, on the whole, but
observed that there was no chaplain. On his second
visit in 1782 he especially commended the keeper of
the Bridewell as attentive and humane. There were
then fifteen debtors and three felons in the Gatehouse. (fn. 50) Nield's account in 1802 describes the 'Low
Gaol' as containing four strong rooms and the 'High
Gaol' as containing a kitchen and other offices and
above them six rooms for the debtors. The Castle
Yard was spacious but not available for exercise
because not secure. Though there was a chaplain,
the prisoners complained they had had no divine
service for four months. (fn. 51) He noted that a new gaol
was building, 'upon a plan similar to that at Bury
St. Edmunds and by the same ingenious architect'. (fn. 52)
The design was octagonal, surrounded by a lofty
wall, based on the latest Benthamite theories. It was
completed by 1807. The last remains of the Edwardian curtain walls were demolished along with
the Bridewell, by order of the justices of the peace, (fn. 53)
and the gatehouse became the picturesque ruin
drawn by Cotman in 1818.
The new County Gaol by the end of the 19th
century was standing idle, as Huntingdon Gaol was
now adequate for the criminals of both counties. In
1919 arrangements were made to fit it up as a
branch repository of the Public Record Office, (fn. 54) and
records began to arrive there in the following year. (fn. 55)
In 1928 the site was acquired for the use of the county
council, the records were sent away in 1929 and
1930, (fn. 56) and the present County Hall was built with
the bricks from the gaol. The surrounding grounds
have been laid out as a small park.
Guildhall.
Until 1855 the market (fn. 57) was an
L-shaped space, which is today represented by the
east and south sides of the market square. To the
west was a block of houses only removed by the fire
of 1849. The space to the south was occupied by
market stalls until leased to the county as the site of
the Shire House. The public announcements nowadays made from the gallery of the Guildhall were
formerly made from the steps of the Market Cross (fn. 58)
or, after its destruction in 1786, from some inn
balcony. Near the Market Cross was the Bull Ring,
which served as an enclosure for the pillory and the
stocks, as well as for bull baiting. The fountain in
the market, mentioned in 1429, was later replaced
by the fountain of Hobson's Conduit, and in 1855 by
another fountain, since greatly altered.
The municipal buildings of Cambridge have
always, so far as is known, stood in the market. From
an early date there must have been a building in
which the courts and assemblies were held and town
treasures preserved, and this may well, as Atkinson
suggests, have been erected over the toll booth in the
market, (fn. 59) on a spot covered by the present Guildhall. (fn. 60) This early building has been identified with
the Jews' house or synagogue granted to the burgesses in 1224 by Henry III to serve as their gaol. (fn. 61)
From 1225 to 1238 this was shared with the Franciscans who in the latter year were granted the whole
of it by Henry III. (fn. 62) When the Franciscans migrated
to Hadstock Way about 1267, (fn. 63) the burgesses appear
to have recovered it and used it for their Guildhall.
The discovery of a Jewish gravestone on the site
strengthens this supposition. (fn. 64) The Tolbooth is first
mentioned in 1322, (fn. 65) when a writ was affixed to its
door. It is probably the same building as the Guildhall alluded to in the first surviving treasurers' roll
for 1347. (fn. 66) In 1386 a new Guildhall was begun, and
completed in 1387. (fn. 67) No treasurers' accounts exist
for the years between 1347 and 1423, and in 1424
there are charges for removing benches 'from the
new Guildhall to the old Guildhall'. (fn. 68) The 'old
Tolbooth' is again mentioned in 1486. (fn. 69) Further
work was done on the building in 1491. (fn. 70) It seems,
then, that the building sketched by Essex in 1781,
that served the town until 1782, was of 15th-century
origin.
The Guildhall was a two-story building supported
on arches and open below on three sides, (fn. 71) so that
market stalls might stand there. In the hall (22 by
17½ ft.) apprentices were enrolled, courts and
Common Days held, and private as well as public
festivities celebrated. A parlour for the aldermen,
with a fireplace, is mentioned in 1569, and there was
a kitchen and pantry. (fn. 72) By 1781 it was a draughty
and rickety chamber (fn. 73) and in the following year it
was pulled down and a new Town Hall erected from
the designs of James Essex. Part of the cost (£2,500)
was defrayed by the creation of a number of honorary freemen. (fn. 74) The building completed in 1784
included a hall (72 by 28 ft.) with a room for the
Four and Twenty; an aldermen's parlour, which
still survives, was added in 1790. (fn. 75) A bridge connected the Town Hall with the Shire House. When
the Shire Hall on Castle Hill was built, the Shire
House in the market-place was added to the Guildhall. (fn. 76) In 1859 it was decided to add an Assembly
Room which would hold 1,400 persons, and the
present large hall was completed in 1865, the floor
below being used for the Town Library, transferred
there from Jesus Lane in 1862. (fn. 77) In 1884 the library
was further enlarged by a reading-room, and in 1895
a building for the County and police Courts was
added on Guildhall Street, the former Butcher
Row. (fn. 78)
In 1933, after considerable discussion, it was decided to rebuild the Guildhall on the ancient site. (fn. 79)
The Guildhall of 1782, which had been considerably
modified internally in the sixties, was destroyed, (fn. 80)
along with the Shire House of 1747 and the remains
of Tanners' Hall, and more space to the west was
acquired by pulling down the row of houses fronting
Union Street (Peas Hill). The present Guildhall was
completed in 1939, after the designs of Mr. Cowles
Voysey; it masks the older buildings to east, north,
and west, and has a fine frontage on the market, with
a balcony from which on 8 May 1945 the end of
the war in Europe was proclaimed.
Town Gaols.
The history of the town gaol
begins in 1224 when the burgesses paid 40 marks to
Henry III to have a grant of the house of Benjamin
the Jew to serve as a town prison, at an annual rent
of 1 mark. (fn. 81) When in 1238 Henry rescinded this
grant in favour of the Grey Friars he allowed the
bailiffs 10 marks out of the Borough farm to build
a new gaol. (fn. 82) This is presumably the building mentioned as the king's prison in Cambridge in a writ
addressed to the town bailiffs in 1248. (fn. 83) It is impossible to say where this building stood, though
it was probably near the Guildhall or Tolbooth,
located after 1267 in the Jews' house. (fn. 84) From 1502
onwards, however, the name Tolbooth seems to be
appropriated to the prison. A will of that year makes
charitable dispositions for 'the prisoners in the Tolbooth'. (fn. 85) It seems probable, therefore, that after the
new Guildhall was built the old Guildhall or Tolbooth became the gaol and the original Jews' house
thus reverted to its 13th-century functions. (fn. 86)
In 1535 Cromwell refers specifically to 'the king's
prisonne called the Tolbothe'. (fn. 87) In 1601 the queen
leased the Tolbooth, by its old name of the house of
Benjamin, to the University, and a lengthy lawsuit
ensued, resulting in its recovery by the Borough. (fn. 88)
In 1605 it was in the charge of one of the town
bailiffs. (fn. 89) This may have been the usual arrangement.
It was there that the one Protestant martyr who suffered at Cambridge, John Hullier, was lodged for
three months in 1556 before he was burned on Jesus
Green. (fn. 90)
In 1620 the gaol is described as consisting of two
divisions, the witches' gaol and the felons' gaol. (fn. 91)
In 1632 it was enlarged, by the addition of Tanners'
Hall, to serve as a house of correction, but this was
given up before 1668. (fn. 92) A debtors' hall, first mentioned in 1637, was turned into the gaoler's house in
1661. (fn. 93) As at the county gaol, the upper floor of the
gaol was reserved for the debtors, (fn. 94) but by the second
half of the 18th century the whole building was in
a very bad state. Carter called it 'a shocking place to
be confined in'. Howard, who visited it in 1776,
described the accommodation for criminals as a cage
above and a hole below 'in which one miserable object
was confined'. There was no fireplace, water-supply,
or courtyard for exercise. (fn. 95) Six years later, Plumptre
wrote to Hardwicke that the building was so ruinous
that the gaoler had given notice. (fn. 96) Nield's account
in 1802 reports with satisfaction that the cage had
fallen into the hole; (fn. 97) but by this time a new town
gaol had been built behind Hobson's Spinning
House (fn. 98) at a cost of £911 10s. 1d. (fn. 99) The old gaol
became a public house, the 'Town Arms', whose
owners had paid £140 for one of those 999-year
leases that characterized the Mortlock régime. (fn. 100) The
town had a bad bargain; the gaol in St. Andrew's
Street was abandoned in 1829, and replaced by the
exceedingly costly structure on the south-east side
of Parker's Piece, (fn. 101) the debt on which was not paid
off until 1847. (fn. 102) This spacious and commodious
building came well up to the standards of the municipal commissioners in 1833; they reported that it
contained eight yards and eight dayrooms and could
accommodate 47 criminals at a time. In 1832 208
prisoners had been housed there and there had been
no deaths. (fn. 103) This third gaol was pulled down in
1878 under the provisions of the Prison Act of 1876,
and since then the prisoners have been sent to the
county gaol. (fn. 104)
From the 16th century at least, a number of
bequests were made for the prisoners in the Tolbooth
and the castle. Payments to be made yearly under the
wills of Thomas Cosyn and Laurence Moptyd, both
Masters of Corpus, (fn. 105) John Hessewell, Mayor, (fn. 106) and
other benefactors had been discontinued long before
the 19th century. (fn. 107) Others survived, and at least one
charity for prisoners in Cambridge was founded as
late as the 19th century. In 1836 bread was given to
the prisoners in the town gaol by the Corporation and
several colleges. The income of all the surviving
prison charities, which amounted to nearly £23 in
1951, is now used by the Discharged Prisoners' Aid
Society. (fn. 108)
Spinning House and Parish Workhouses.
The Spinning House, a somewhat notorious Bridewell or house of correction, originated as a
charitable trust founded in 1628 by Thomas Hobson, the carrier, (fn. 109) to serve the needs both of the University and the Borough. Further bequests in the
17th and 18th centuries increased the endowment. (fn. 110)
No real attempt had been made to carry out the provisions of the Elizabethan poor law until 1596, when
Borough and University had combined to open a
house of correction and purchase stock for giving
employment. (fn. 111) The building erected with Hobson's
benefaction in St. Andrew's Street was meant to
serve the double purpose of providing textile work
for the decent unemployed and correction for the unruly vagabond and rogue. (fn. 112) In the latter capacity it
had replaced the Bridewell in Tanners' Hall by 1668.
The house of correction finally triumphed over the
workhouse. As late as 1802, however, the keeper was
a woolcomber employing other workers beside the
prisoners (fn. 113) and in 1813 Bowtell bequeathed £500 to
the trustees for putting out poor Cambridge boys as
apprentices. (fn. 114) Well before this the Spinning House
had become associated specifically with the correction of prostitutes and served as the Vice-Chancellor's prison for that purpose, the town crier being
hired to flog such women at 1s. a head. (fn. 115) Dr. Ewin,
after visiting the county gaol in January 1776, went
on to the Spinning House and reported to Hardwicke
that he had found six young streetwalkers in a state
of utmost misery and want. They had been there
six months, having been apprehended either by the
proctor or the High Constable; they had been passed
home but returned again. They had no fire and
nothing but what they could earn by spinning or
beating hemp. Ewin called on the Vice-Chancellor
who, he said, would probably send something to
keep the girls warm while the hard weather held.
He also persuaded him to send in bedsteads so that
the inmates should not lie on straw or on the ground.
The large window was always broken again as soon
as mended, and the gaoler, 'a humane and diligent
man', told Ewin that anything of value placed in the
house would be burned or destroyed by the prisoners. (fn. 116) Three years later, in the spring of 1779, 17
women were crowded into the workroom which had
neither fireplace nor sewer, and an outbreak of fever
resulted which so alarmed the Vice-Chancellor that
he ordered all the women to be released. Two or
three of them died in a few days. As a result two
rooms had been added before Howard paid his
second visit in 1782, but there was still no fireplace.
A lunatic was confined there in addition to the other
prisoners in 1779. (fn. 117) Nield in 1802 described the
whole prison as very dirty. (fn. 118) In 1812 and 1821 considerable sums were spent on the building, the
money on the second occasion being quite improperly taken from Bowtell's apprenticing fund. (fn. 119) In
about 1836, though the building was in good repair,
the charity commissioners found many faults in
the administration of the trust and its property. (fn. 120) A
Chancery action against the trustees had been begun
in 1833, and under a scheme for the charity made in
Chancery in 1852 the northern part of the building
became the Vice-Chancellor's prison for prostitutes
and the southern part a lock-up and police-station
for the town. (fn. 121) Before this, the Borough magistrates
had stopped committing prisoners to the Spinning
House when the new town gaol opened in 1829. (fn. 122)
In 1897 the whole building was handed over to the
Borough and in 1901 it was taken down and the
present police station was built on its site. (fn. 123) After
1897 the income of the original trust accruing from
rents and stocks was employed on education and
charitable institutions for the care or reform of
women. (fn. 124)
The Spinning House had ceased to be used as a
workhouse from 1807; stores of flax and wool were no
longer kept there. (fn. 125) After the Act of 1723 parish workhouses had been instituted in all the parishes of Cambridge, either separately or jointly; their history
has been traced by Dr. Stokes, who has located a
number of the actual buildings, and sketched the
condition of the inmates. (fn. 126) The proposal that a
workhouse for the whole town should be established
was turned down in 1727 and again in 1750. 'The
several parish workhouses went on with their differing methods and with their increasing cost.' (fn. 127) Finally
in 1836 all the parishes of Cambridge were united
in one Poor Law Union and in 1838 the Central
Union Poor House in Mill Road was built for 250
inmates. (fn. 128)
Public Library.
The earliest circulating library in Cambridge was opened in 1745 by Robert
Watts in a bookshop on the west side of Trumpington Street, in St. Edward's parish. It was carried on
by his son-in-law, John Nicholson, and his grandson
and great-grandson, both of the same name, from
1807 onwards at 1 Trinity Street. The library was
closed in 1822. (fn. 129) A Book Club founded in 1784 'for
promoting useful knowledge' had a library of more
than 2,000 volumes. It met weekly at the Black Bull
Inn. Its membership was, however, limited to 50
and it came to an end in 1841. (fn. 130)
In 1853 the Borough Council voted to adopt the
Public Library Act of 1850. In a town meeting on
1 March 1853 the proposal was carried by a majority
of 873 to 78, (fn. 131) and the Town Library came into
being in 1855. It began with a reference library,
housed in the temporarily unused Friends' Meeting
House in Jesus Lane.
A lending department was opened in April 1858,
and in 1860, after considerable debate, a newspaper
reading room. In 1862 the library moved to its present quarters under the Guildhall. In 1872 children
were admitted. Branches were opened in East Road
in 1875 and Mill Road in 1897. The central reading
room was added in 1884 and the reference room in
1916. Open access to the shelves was granted in 1922.
In 1950 the library contained over 70,000 volumes.
It includes a most valuable collection of prints, maps,
posters, cuttings, and other memorials of the history
of the town. The collection owes much of its value to
the first librarian, John Pink, who held the post from
1855 to 1906. (fn. 132)