|
|
Membrane 8d. |
Feb. 20.
Westminster. |
William de Fourneys of London acknowledges that he owes to John de
Blyton, citizen of London, 50l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his
lands and chattels in co. Middlesex. |
|
Enrolment of release by Thomas Fillol to John de Handlo and Matilda
his wife of his right in 140 acres of land and 4s. of rent in Hatfeld Peverel
and Borham, co. Essex, concerning which he impleaded them in the king's
court by writ of entry. Witnesses: Sir Ralph de Camoys, Sir Nicholas
Gentyl, Sir William de Henle, knights; Edmund de Ayette; Thomas
Bakoun; William de Wykkewane. Dated at Westminister, 21 February,
13 Edward II. |
|
Memorandum, that Thomas came into chancery at Westminster, on
22 February, and acknowledged the above. |
Feb. 22.
Westminster. |
Walter son of Robert de Davyntre and Robert his son acknowledge that
they owe to John de Sancto Mauro 40l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of their lands and chattels in cos. Northampton and Bedford. |
|
John Stoyl of Westwytenham acknowledges that he owes to Master John
de Blebury, parson of Newenham Courteneye, 20l.; to be levied, in default
of payment, of his lands and chattels in co. Berks. |
Feb. 24.
Westminster. |
Geoffrey Bere of Tamworth acknowledges that he owes to Master Henry
de Clyf 55 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and
chattels in co. Stafford. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
| — |
Michael Belle puts in his place Master John Boerleke, John Slabard,
Peter Cram, and James Waterbalgh to sue and defend the matter of an
arrest against Arnold de Ispan[nia]. |
|
Laurence de Elmham acknowledges that he owes to John Hayward
60 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in
cos. Suffolk, York, and London. |
|
John de Vienn[a] acknowledges that he owes to Roger Ardyngelli, Bonus
Philippi and Dinus Forcetti, and their fellows, merchants of the society of
the Bardi of Florence, 18l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands
and chattels in co. Wilts. |
|
Maurice son of Thomas de Bercleye, John son of John Mautravers, and
Maurice son of Maurice de Bercleye acknowledge that they owe to Aymer
de Valencia, earl of Pembroke, 150l.; to be levied, in default of payment,
of their lands and chattels in cos. Gloucester, Somerset, and Dorset. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
Feb. 26.
Westminster. |
William de Whitefeld acknowledges that he owes to Aymer de Valencia,
earl of Pembroke, 10l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands
and chattels in co. Dorset. |
|
Thomas son of Robert de Bradestone and John son of John Mautravers
acknowledge that they owe to Aymer de Valencia, earl of Pembroke, 40l.;
to be levied, in default of payment, of their lands and chattels in cos. Dorset
and Gloucester. |
|
Ranulph son of William de Dacre acknowledges that he owes to Manent
Francisci and John his brother, merchants of Florence, 300l.; to be levied,
in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in cos. Cumberland, Westmoreland, and Lancaster. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
Feb. 25.
Westminster. |
Maurice son of Thomas de Bercleye, John son of John Mautravers, and
Maurice son of Maurice de Bercleye acknowledge that they owe to Aymer
de Valencia, earl of Pembroke, 300 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of their lands and chattels in cos. Somerset and Dorset. |
|
The prior of Bermundeseye acknowledges, for himself and his convent,
that he owes to John Francisci and Magnus Frugerii, merchants of
Florence, 100 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of their lands
and chattels in co. Surrey. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
Feb. 28.
Westminster. |
Ranulph de Dacre acknowledges that he owes to John de Lancastre
2,000l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in
co. Cumberland. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
|
Robert Parnyng acknowledges that he owes to John de Lancastre 300l.;
to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in co. Cumberland. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
|
Enrolment of obligation of John de Monkelane, sub-escheator in
cos. Bucks and Bedford, to Sir Richard de Rodeneye, escheator this side
Trent, for 50l. to be paid in St. Paul's London at Michaelmas and the
Purification next. Dated at London, Wednesday after St. Matthias,
13 Edward II. |
|
Memorandum, that John came into chancery, on the same day, and
acknowledged the above. |
|
Like obligations for the same sum were made to the said Richard by the
following: |
|
Richard de Foxcote, sub-escheator in co. Gloucester and the Marches
of Wales. |
|
William de Rosteleye, clerk, sub-escheator in cos. Warwick and
Leicester. |
|
John de Croxford, sub-escheator in cos. Oxford and Berks. |
|
William de Neuport, sub-escheator in cos. Essex and Hereford (sic). |
|
John de Broghton, sub-escheator in cos. Norfolk. |
|
Andrew de Kendale, sub-escheator in cos. Salop and Stafford. |
|
Robert de Stodham, sub-escheator in cos. Nottingham and Derby. |
|
John de Ledrede, sub-escheator in cos. Southampton and Sussex. |
|
Robert Squier, sub-escheator in co. Worcester. |
|
John de Sancto Albano, sub-escheator in cos. Cambridge and Huntingdon, dated at London, Sunday after St. Gregory. |
Feb. 28.
Westminster. |
Thomas Chanturel acknowledges that he owes to Richard de Goyton,
'vylour,' 40 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and
chattels in cos. Berks and Oxford. |
Feb. 28.
Westminster. |
Gilbert de Rues acknowledges that he owes to Aymer de Valencia, earl
of Pembroke, 10l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and
chattels in co. Gloucester. |
|
John, prior of Newenham, acknowledges, for himself and convent, that
he owes to Leonard Vento of Genoa, merchant, 200l.; to be levied, in
default of payment, of his lands and chattels in co. Bedford. |
|
Cancelled on payment. |
|
Thomas, abbot [of] Pypwelle, acknowledges, for himself and convent,
that he owes to Manent Francisci and John his brother, merchants of
Florence, 100l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and
chattels in co. Gloucester. |
|
Richard de la Rivere, knight, and Thomas de Brocworth acknowledge
that they owe to Aymer de Valencia, earl of Pembroke, 23l. 6s. 8d.; to
be levied, in default of payment, of their lands and chattels in co. Gloucester. |
|
Robert de Botlesford, lord of Stodham, acknowledges that he owes to
Henry Norman of Berkhamstede 10l.; to be levied, in default of payment,
of his lands and chattels in co. Bedford. |
|
Enrolment of grant by John de Radingden, knight, to John de Wauton,
of his manor of Arnington, co. Cambridge, with all appurtenances, which
manor John de Wauton previously held of the donor. Witnesses: Warin
de Bassingburn; John Fraunceys; Sir William de Sap'; Philip de Stowe;
Ralph Riggesby. Dated at Arni[n]gton, on Friday after St. Matthias,
13 Edward II. |
|
Memorandum, that John came into chancery, on the said day, and
acknowledged the above. |
Feb. 3.
Rochester. |
John de Wauton acknowledges that he owes to John de Radyngdene,
knight, 100l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels
in co. Essex. |
|
Cancelled on payment acknowledged by Nicholas de la Heuse, attorney
of John de Radyngdene. |
|
The aforesaid John de Radyngdene puts Nicholas de la Heuse in his
place to prosecute the above recognisance. |
Feb. 28.
Westminster. |
To R. count of Flanders. The king has received his letters requesting
him to release Perottus Loef, burgess of Sluys (Lescluse), and his fellows of
the parts of Flanders, from prison at Norwich, whom the count learns are
faithful merchants; the king upon another occasion released, at the
count's request, many of his subjects who were found in the company
of the Scotch rebels, and requested the count to warn his subjects not to
communicate with the said rebels, nor to maintain them in any way,
adding that if any of the count's subjects communicated with the Scots, or
were found in their company, he would in no wise shew them favour. The
king cannot at present release Perrottus and his fellows, because they
notoriously communicated with the rebels afterwards, and maintained them
for a long time, and were found in their company, adhering to them in all
things. The king believes that the count would not intercede for Perrottus
and his fellows if he were acquainted with the malice perpetrated by them
against the king, and he therefore prays the count to hold him excused in
the premises. |
