Close Rolls, Edward III: January 1339

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 4, 1337-1339. Originally published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1900.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward III: January 1339', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 4, 1337-1339, (London, 1900) pp. 629. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw3/vol4/p629 [accessed 23 April 2024]

Image

January 1339

Jan. 4.
Windsor.
To John de Boys of Kyngeswere, master of a ship called 'La Michel' of Dertemouth. Order to be before the chancellor and others of the council at London on the quinzaine of Hilary next, to answer to the king upon things which shall be set forth to him, and further to do and receive what shall then be enjoined upon him. By C.
William de Wittresham puts in his place Thomas de Ordegrave, clerk, to defend the execution of a recognisance for 150l. made by him in chancery to John atte Gate.
Membrane 11d.
Enrolment of release by Thomas de Rokesle the younger to Richard de Byntteworth, bishop of London, of all his right and claim in certain plots of land called 'le Bole' and 'la Cou' in Byntteworth, co. Southampton, which contain 70 acres of land. Witnesses: John de Roches, Robert Daundele, John Scures, knights, John son of John de Thedden, Roland de Wykford, John de Petresfeld, Augustine de Berkham. Dated at London on 5 January, 12 Edward III.
Memorandum that Thomas came into chancery at London on the said day and acknowledged the preceding deed.
Jan. 8.
Berkhamp-stead.
To Richard de Wylughby and his fellows, justices appointed to hold pleas before the king. Order to continue the assize of novel desseisin which William de Wyvelyngham arrames against William le Engleys of Paxton concerning a tenement in Hokyton, co. Cambridge, in the same state in which it now is, according to the agreement made at Notyngham, as William le Engleys is staying in the king's service in parts beyond the sea, and the king ordered the justices so to behave in that assize that no harm or prejudice should happen to William le Engleys, but they have not hitherto cared to continue the assize. By p.s.