Search
A History of the County of Warwick
… son Ralph Boteler in 1212 granted the whole vill to John Belet, to hold as one-quarter knight's fee. 55 In 1279 this …
A History of the County of Surrey
… his fishery as guardian of Alice daughter and heir of John Belet, who held the neighbouring manor of Richmond. The suit …
A History of the County of Surrey
… of Sheen, and was granted by the king to the family of Belet, who held it by the serjeanty of butlery. 174 In 1206 Master Michael Belet paid the sum of 100 for the office of butlership. 175 … de Ralegh. 178 This daughter appears to have been the Maud Belet who died in or before 1229, when her lands devolved on …
Thoroton's History of Nottinghamshire
… and Heir, then thirty Years old, and the Wife of Ingeram Belet: it was then called the Soc of Scarington, as I have …
Thoroton's History of Nottinghamshire
… before William Fitz-Raph, and William Basset, and Michael Belet, the King's Justices, between Hugh, Son of Alan, and …
A History of the County of Hampshire
… including Lasham and Greatham, and in 1216 Henry Belet was commanded not to receive him into the king's peace …
A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely
… and Wendy passed to Sibyl who married first Ralph Belet (fl. 1212) and secondly Hugh Giffard 59 who held part … claimed rights in the advowson of Wendy along with Ralph Belet. 75 Roger's estate in Wendy apparently descended to …
A History of the County of Surrey
… manor. 16 The other part of Bagshot was granted to John Belet by Henry III, and descended to his son Michael. 17 Both …
A History of the County of Warwick
… wives being sisters of Robert son of Robert son of John Belet, who had held the land in right of his wife Alice in …
A History of the County of Hampshire
… 3 William I bestowed it on one of his thegns, William Belet by name, and at the time of the Domesday Survey it was … The overlordship continued with the descendants of William Belet until as late at least as 1302, in which year the manor was said to be held of William Belet, 5 but subsequent to that date there is no further …