The hundred of Pyrton

A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 8, Lewknor and Pyrton Hundreds. Originally published by Victoria County History, London, 1964.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.


'The hundred of Pyrton', in A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 8, Lewknor and Pyrton Hundreds, ed. Mary D Lobel( London, 1964), British History Online [accessed 15 July 2024].

'The hundred of Pyrton', in A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 8, Lewknor and Pyrton Hundreds. Edited by Mary D Lobel( London, 1964), British History Online, accessed July 15, 2024,

"The hundred of Pyrton". A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 8, Lewknor and Pyrton Hundreds. Ed. Mary D Lobel(London, 1964), , British History Online. Web. 15 July 2024.


In the 19th century the hundred covered 14,190 acres and was thinly populated, having only 3,525 inhabitants in 1841. (fn. 1) It was composed of the parishes of Pishill, Pyrton, Shirburn, Stoke Talmage, South Weston, part of Wheatfield, and the market-town of Watlington.

The ancient trackway, the Icknield Way, running at the foot of the Chiltern hills divides the hundred into two, and roughly separates the highlands from the lowlands. The soil and landscape are very varied: to the south-east are the chalk hills of the Chilterns, covered with beechwoods and rough pasture; to the north-west, which is mainly flat and hedged, lie clay arable fields and meadows which, although there was much early inclosure, were not completely inclosed and hedged until the first decades of the 19th century. The plain has always produced comparatively rich crops: Arthur Young, to take one observer, when crossing from Thame by way of Stoke Talmage to Goldor in Pyrton, noticed 'much good pasturage' and 'very fine open field arable'. (fn. 2) The hills in the 19th century, though cultivated in parts, were chiefly used as sheep walks. The hundred was wholly given over to agriculture, for Watlington had no industry of any importance and lived mainly by its market, shops, and inns.


The area marked by the letter A is a detached part of Newington parish in Ewelme hundred.

The beauty of the countryside and its productive soil have always attracted a number of residents of means. In the 16th and 17th centuries many of these families, notably the Stonors of Stonor and the Chamberlains and Gages of Shirburn, were devoted adherents of the old religion, and today Stonor is still a stronghold of Roman Catholicism. The earls of Macclesfield in the 18th century made Shirburn famous as a scientific and literary centre and have since played a leading part in county affairs.

The hundred is distinguished in having two medieval houses of historic importance, Shirburn Castle and Stonor Park, as well as the remains of a third small medieval manor-house at Pishill. The Elizabethan manor-house at Pyrton has also survived, but Lord Charles Spencer's 18th-century mansion at Wheatfield was destroyed by fire in 1814. The church at Wheatfield, remodelled in the 18th century, is also noteworthy.

The area has no important prehistoric or Roman sites though there are many indications of early settlement and of Roman occupation, (fn. 3) but it is of interest for the number of sites, some of which have not yet been located, of deserted medieval hamlets.

Pyrton is one of the few Oxfordshire hundreds named in Domesday Book, (fn. 4) but the hundred is first described in detail in 1279. (fn. 5) There is no reason, however, to suppose that the principal villages comprising the hundred in 1279 did not do so in 1086 or when the hundred was originally formed.

A calculation of the hidage of the villages in 1086 comes to 103 hides, a close approximation to the normal 100 hides. Pyrton was assessed at 40 hides, Shirburn at 20, Stoke Talmage at 10, Watlington at 23, of which 3 were definitely stated to be in Watcombe and 2½ in Ingham (Adingeham), South Weston at 9 hides, and Wheatfield at two. (fn. 6) A striking point about these hidages is that in many cases it can clearly be seen that they were assessed on estates that preceded the parish. Pyrton and Watlington apparently divided Pishill between them; South Weston included land assessed at 1 hide in Wormsley and other land in Wheatfield. (fn. 7) Before 1106 Wormsley was alienated to Abingdon Abbey whose chief estate in this part of the Chilterns lay at Lewknor in the neighbouring hundred. It was probably, therefore, at this time that Wormsley was transferred to Lewknor hundred. (fn. 8) Otherwise, the composition of the hundred remained unaltered until 1841. (fn. 9)

The hundred, with the other 3½ hundreds, was given away by the Crown and came under the lord of Wallingford honor and the Earldom of Cornwall in 1244, and was later attached to Ewelme honor. (fn. 10) The Earl of Cornwall was said in 1279 to have all royal rights and liberties within the hundred, and in 1285 he claimed specifically the right to have return of writs, gallows, and assizes of bread and ale. (fn. 11)

The hundred court and view were held at Pyrton under the honor of Wallingford, but not all the villages of the hundred attended, for some were original fees of the honor and, therefore, owed suit to the view of the honor at Watlington. These fees were Pishill Napper (i.e. one of the manors in Pishill), the Baldon fee in Watcombe in Watlington, and Watlington itself with its hamlet of Syresfield. (fn. 12) By 1284 Stoke Talmage, which used to attend Pyrton hundred court, had ceased to do so, as the Earl of Cornwall had granted view of frankpledge and suit to the hundred to Rewley Abbey, which in turn granted these privileges in 1287 to Thame Abbey. (fn. 13) Stoke Talmage, therefore, does not appear in the later records of Pyrton hundred.

Records of the three-weekly hundred court and of the view which were administered under the bailiwick of Wallingford survive. The annual view court was attended by four tithing men from Shirburn, two each from Pyrton and Clare, and one each from Goldor and Standhill, both tithings of Pyrton, one each from Pishill Venables (i.e. the other manor in Pishill), Warmscombe, Watcombe (i.e. the Préaux Abbey holding in Watcombe), South Weston, and Wheatfield. They paid cert ranging from 6d. to 4s. (fn. 14) The absence of a tithingman for Assendon seems to be explained by the fact that Pishill, as on other occasions, includes the tithings of Pishill Venables and Assendon: later records sometime refer to 'Pishill alias Assendon'. (fn. 15) Little business was transacted at the threeweekly court or view by the 15th century: the tithingman usually said that all was well or presented a few cases of breach of assize of ale or petty assault, and in the year 1431–2 the profits of the seventeen hundred courts totalled only £1 16s. 11d. The view of frankpledge court held in April 1432 collected 16s. 5d. cert money and 8s. in small perquisites. (fn. 16) In the 16th century the views seem to have been reorganized and the court was held jointly with Lewknor. On several occasions it was held at Shirburn, (fn. 17) but later at Lewknor down to the 19th century. (fn. 18)

By the 17th century the hundred was divided into a north and south division. The north consisted of Clare, Goldor, Standhill, Stoke Talmage, South Weston, and Wheatfield, and the south of Assendon, Greenfield, Pishill, Pyrton, Shirburn, and Watlington. The chief constables were yeomen, Watlington traders, and gentry.

As an administrative unit the Crown used the hundred in various ways, notably to collect taxes, to regulate alehouses, place apprentices, and see to the keeping of watch and ward and proper provision of poor relief. (fn. 19) Its use to control vagrants is seen in 1600 when the two high constables reported that they had kept watch and ward on the night of 1 November and the day following, but that nothing had happened. (fn. 20) In 1639 a number of owners and tenants of the hundred, 'aggrieved at the surcharge' on the hundred for ship-money, petitioned the Privy Council. (fn. 21)


  • 1. Census, 1841. The Oxfordshire part of Ibstone, hitherto always in Lewknor hundred, was included in Pyrton hundred in this census.
  • 2. Young, Oxon. Agric. 8.
  • 3. See V.C.H. Oxon. i, maps between pp. 236 and 237, 266a and 267; and below, index.
  • 4. V.C.H. Oxon. i. 400, 413.
  • 5. Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.), ii. 812–19. Clare, Goldor, and Standhill appear as hamlets of Pyrton in 1279 and the existence of Assendon is implied. Warmscombe appears as a hamlet of Watlington, and the lords of Watlington's other hamlets of Syresfield and Watcombe are mentioned in the survey of Watlington. For the villages and hamlets see also the tax assessments of the 14th cent., e.g. E 179/ 161/8, 9, 10. It may be noted here that Wyfaude, which has been identified with Wheatfield (e.g. Earldom of Cornwall Accts. i (Cam. Soc. 3rd ser. lxvi), 102, and index), is Wyfolds Court in Checkendon: see Rot. Hund. ii. 764; O.R.O. CH/E.
  • 6. V.C.H. Oxon. i. 408, 409, 413, 414, 415, 419, 425, 426.
  • 7. See below, pp. 131, 253.
  • 8. Chron. Mon. de Abingdon (Rolls Ser.), ii. 67–68; and see above, p. 1.
  • 9. See A. Bryant, Oxon. Map (1824); Census, 1841. Ibstone was transferred wholly to Bucks. by the Co. of Bucks. and Oxon. Confirmation Order, 1894, L.G.B.O. 31987.
  • 10. For the descent see above, p. 4.
  • 11. Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.), ii. 812; Plac. de Quo Warr. (Rec. Com.), 669.
  • 12. Rot. Hund. ii. 815.
  • 13. Cal. Pat. 1281–92, 133; Cal. Chart. R. 1257–1300, 339; Dugdale, Mon. v. 405.
  • 14. e.g. S.C. 2/212/4. The court records are on the same rolls and for the same years as Lewknor hundred: see above, p. 5.
  • 15. e.g. in 1714: d.d. Ewelme honor, d r, bundle 4; and in 1790: O.R.O. CH/E. VII/1.
  • 16. S.C. 2/212/4.
  • 17. e.g. ibid. 15, 18, 20.
  • 18. See d.d. Ewelme honor, d 1–3, passim; O.R.O. CH/E. VII.
  • 19. Cal. S.P. Dom. 1635, 177.
  • 20. Ibid. 1598–1601, 494.
  • 21. Shirburn Mun. Note on back of terrier. For petitions against ship-money see Cal. S.P. Dom. 1639, 246, 350–1; and cf. ibid. 1640, 253, 599.