Search

Displaying 951 - 960 of 9571
Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae 1066-1300
… Sept. 1198, but there is no authority for this; perhaps an error based on the fact that William received a preb. in York …
Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae 1300-1541
… proved 24 Aug. (Lamb., Reg. Stafford f. 165). Possibly an error for 18 July, as it is said to be a Monday (Reg. …
A History of the County of Gloucester
A History of the County of Oxford
… only 2 slaves with 2 ploughteams were recorded, perhaps in error; land for 2 teams was noted, and the manor's value had …
A History of the County of Oxford
… last noted in 1368 when the overlord was said, probably in error, to be Robert de Lisle of Rougemont. 62 Before the mid …
A History of the County of Lancaster
… (Chet. Soc), i, 44. The last-named rent is probably an error for 53 s. 4 d., i.e. 4 marks. John de Bailey in 1391 … Gerard has pointed out (op. cit. 53) that this must be an error for 1694. Sir Nicholas' own accounts and those of his …
Old and New London
… of good fortune to Catholics and of the overthrow of error and heresy. This zealous, but not well-informed, writer …
A Dictionary of London
… owners of the property, and that Stow is probably in error in identifying it with the "haugh" or "hawe" of the …
A History of the County of Oxford
… recorded until 1279 when the estate was said, perhaps in error, to be of the fee of Robert d'Oilly. 82 By the late …
A History of the County of Oxford
… 965; Green, Blenheim Palace, 283, gives a date 1791 in error: cf. Mavor, New Description (1789), 86-7. B.L. Add. MS. …
Displaying 951 - 960 of 9571