Debates in 1689: July 1st

Grey's Debates of the House of Commons: Volume 9. Originally published by T. Becket and P. A. De Hondt, London, 1769.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.


'Debates in 1689: July 1st', in Grey's Debates of the House of Commons: Volume 9, ed. Anchitell Grey( London, 1769), British History Online [accessed 23 July 2024].

'Debates in 1689: July 1st', in Grey's Debates of the House of Commons: Volume 9. Edited by Anchitell Grey( London, 1769), British History Online, accessed July 23, 2024,

"Debates in 1689: July 1st". Grey's Debates of the House of Commons: Volume 9. Ed. Anchitell Grey(London, 1769), , British History Online. Web. 23 July 2024.

In this section

Monday, July 1.

On the Heads of Exceptions in the Bill of Indemnity.

The Prosecution of the Bishops was moved to be another Head.

Sir Leveson Gower.] I have spoken with several of the Bishops about their Prosecution. They are better Christians than to desire any body should be prosecuted upon their Account. I think therefore the House may pass upon some other Head.

On the Commission for Ecclesiastical Causes.

Mr Garroway.] I think, if you proceed upon the Debate of this Head, that it will puzzle the Lawyers to make it capital. Though the High-Commission Court is down by Act of Parliament, yet the King has a great Power in Ecclesiastical Affairs. As for Mr Johnson, I would make him satisfaction for his Sufferings (fn. 1); and then the Question will be, Whether you will proceed any farther upon this Article?

Sir Richard Temple.] The Bishops were proceeded against for addressing the King about the Declaration, that cut up all your Laws by the Roots. I take this occasion to venture a Motion, to except some Persons. If you go head, by Head, you will nominate so many, that you will alarm the whole Nation, and never be at an end, and be much entangled in the Business.

Col. Austen.] I am for naming mighty Members, but you do not Justice to the Nation, nor is the cry of Blood answered, if you do not your Duty.

Mr Hawles.] I am for excepting few as to life suppose four or two. You know a dead man for one, one in the Prison for another; some are at liberty, and the most guilty persons escape. If the ministerial Persons be excepted, and escape, if that be so, do as you please, and except as few as you please.

Mr Howe.] I think what you are now doing is in consideration of what has been done before, so as to secure you for the future. Some have gone so far as to justify King James in what he has done; if you exempt those, you arraign what you have done already. The first rise and spring of the Bill of Exclusion was the Popish Plot, and for maintaining Popery you rejected him out of the Kingdom. Kings do no wrong, but if Ministers do no wrong—Therefore for our own Justification, either yield that King James is wrongfully put out of his Kingdom;— if you proceed not against his Counsellors we must conclude either that we have done wrong, or that King James has done none at all.

Mr Harbord.] I am for catching the great Fishes; to catch little Rogues is not worth your while. I would not fall into this same misfortune by not making Examples. This Ecclesiastical Court was not managed by Jenner; he is a little fellow. But for a Secretary of State (Lord Sunderland) to renounce his God, and act in that Commission, you had as good give up all as not to question him. Mr Johnson's wounds smart upon us. If he escape thus, what security can we have? I am not for sweeping all the Commissioners, but go on upon this Head, and make some Examples.

Mr Arnold.] I wonder that those who serve for the University of Oxford, are no more concerned in this Commission of Magdalen College.

Sir William Williams.] Consider this Commission in its Constitution. Nothing in itself, these seven or eight years, has been so pernicious, that Ecclesiastics should be constituted, not only to suspend this or that Bishop, but to unbishop and unecclesiastic them! Things grow on by steps and degrees; when they found that the Bishops and Temporal Peers came into the Commission, they would be felo de se. 'Tis fit to make an Example of these Persons, who have violated their own Function and their own Law. Make one Example of him, as you have done of the Judges.

Mr Coningsby.] This is lumping indeed. If we must lump, I would do it in mercy; do in this as in the other Heads. Here are but ten, and as you have exempted but two out of the former, pray exempt but two out of this.

Mr Smith.] None of these acted according to their Commissions, but set up a Law-making Power. This did subvert both Church and State; but to say, that some favoured the Protestants—but I would have it showed, what Protestants, unless their private Friends, to excuse them. I would favour as much as any man; some that have gone farthest, as those in the first and second Commission, I would lay some Punishment on lightly, but remark those that acted in the latter; I would not so much as exempt the Clerks. If I make Enemies of them, I care not. I am not for being an Enemy to my Country. I would put some mark upon them all.

Mr Wynn.] Will you except one (Lord Rochester) who gave up his White Staff, and would act no farther when he saw how things tended?

Mr Howe.] This Power was certainly unlawful. In those who modestly withdrew from the Commission, it shows Repentance. Those who are dead, are past your Justice. If you please, let all their Names be read, and then distinguish them.

Major Wildman.] I must speak against my own nature and disposition now. It is natural to spare all, but of necessity we must vindicate our Country's Liberties. I have sat here with astonishment, to hear excuses for any that sat in that Commission. It was called "the Ecclesiastical Commission," but it laid the Axe to the Root of all our Properties, Goods, and Land in England. In one Clause of the last Commission they were more modest than in the first. It gave a Power to make all the Noblemen and Gentlemen in England dance attendance upon them, and Power to examine every man's conscience concerning his whole life against God or Man; upon pain of Excommunication they must answer every question, or else the Chancellor was ready to grant out the Writ De excommunicato capiendo; whatever the crime was, though against himself. This gave a Liberty to all Informers; they might give what Costs and Damages they pleased. As the Commission gave Power of all Persons, so also of Colleges and Cathedrals, to dispose of all the Lands in England of all Bodies Corporate at their discretion, however confirmed by Acts of Parliament. They had Power to cause Mass to be said in Churches; they might turn out all Incumbents, and take their Lands for Popish uses. By this it is most apparent that King James broke the original Contract with the People, and violated all the Laws that were made to protect our Liberty and Property. They executed these Powers in part; they caused all Colleges to bring in their Statutes. In Sidney College, the Founders took especial care, and did abhor the Errors of Popery, and to have free Elections in the College; they called for the StatuteBook, and razed those out for ever, and, when they could not get Mass to be said in the College, they set it up in the Porter's Lodge, that at length it might come into the College. Never was there such a thing done in the face of the Sun, to bring in Popery, and to discourage the Protestant Religion, giving Costs and Damages, and all mens Estates at their Will. The Duke of Norfolk was not excepted; he had a Writ De excommunicatio capiendo issued against him, if he did not obey them, in an Order about his Lady. All was at their will. If you excuse these men, except all the rest without ceremony. Our Ancestors, when they came to reform the Goverment in Henry VIII's time, made Examples of Empson and Dudley, who cunningly got a Patent to punish men in a summary way, without Juries. Empson and Dudley were attainted for Treason, for so the Record is entered in the Parliament Bill. Their Decree was without any Remedy; by that cursed Non obstante to the Laws of England, all was laid level before these Commissioners. As that prosecution of Empson and Dudley, who were the Instrument of the ill Government, cost them their lives, so severe was their punishment—But when Queen Elizabeth gave but a poor Patent for a place, and sent it to the Judges to pass it, they said they durst not; examples were fresh of those who advised against the Laws, although the Queen commanded it too in person. They saw the Shipwreck, where our Ancestors had set up Buoys, and it was avoided. You need look no farther to find their proceeding than into their own Books, how they unfunctioned the Clergy. I leave them to your Justice. All they have done has been proved before you.

Sir John Guise.] I should not pretend to exaggerate this Commission, but am of Opinion that there can be no degrees in it; but I observe one thing in it, that it principally arises from the Privy-Council, who first ordered it, and then executed it themselves. I speak plainly, I think it of so high a nature, that whoever does own such a Commission is never fit to serve the Nation in any public capacity. I know not their Names, but begin first with the Privy Counsellors, and their Actions; that if any be employed now, to take care they shall never be for the future.

Mr Estrick.] Being named of this Commission, and acting upon it, are very different. I am for making as many friends as we can; so many as you except, so many enemies you make to the Government. To take all who were named in the Commission, you must take the Archbishop of Camerbury (fn. 2). Many that were not versed in Law knew not the saving in taking away the High-Commission Court. When they saw it gone, they could not apprehend the consequence. Those who acted upon the third, fourth, and fifth Commission plainly acted against the Laws. You did take several Commissions, and read several Names in them; all of them did not act in it. I would not put blots upon persons who have been and may be useful to you. Lord Rochester quitted the Staff purely because he would not go on in the Popish Interest. It is plain that this lumping them takes him in. Therefore I would have them that acted in the Commission, excepted by Name.

Major Wildman.] I did not, in any thing I said, reflect on the Archbishop of Canterbury. I said only, "He was named in the Commission;" but he never sat. Pray read the Commission.

On Lord Chancellor Jeffreys.

Sir William Williams] No man deserves to be excepted more than he; but will you begin with a dead Person?

He was excepted.

On the Earl of Rochester.

Sir Thomas Mompesson.] Pray put no Question upon him; he was left out of three Commissions.

Sir William Williams.] If you save any man, this ought to be he. When your Privileges were arraigned, he stood to you; he is but in the first and second Commission; let him be left out.

Sir Thomas Littleton.] I find it the disposition of the House to pass by this Lord. But put the Question solemnly; not to pass it off as if he were a great man, and had friends, and so lest out.

Sir John Guise.] I shall be as gentle upon this noble Lord as any body. I cannot consent to excuse him, but put no Question upon him.

Mr Smith.] I am ready to excuse this Gentleman, if by Vote, but not to excuse him by a Vote will seem to the World as if he was guilty of no Crime. I am satisfied he has deserved great punishment if his merits had not atoned for him. He has served the Nation well in the Bishops case, and is a good Protestant.

Sir Robert Howard.] I have heard from the Bishop of London the great tenderness this Lord showed in his Case, and how he behaved himself in the public dispute, managed by Dr Jane and Dr Patrick, with the Jesuits. I would never put it to the Question, but to have it marked as an ill thing to sit in the Ecclesiastical Commission, but to say it is no crime, that is a fault—I would have these things applied to his pardon, not to his justification; therefore I would put no Question upon him.

Earl of Ranelagh.] There is nobody in the House, but will say this was a crime in this Lord, &c. but whether he shall not be excepted out of the Indemnity for having sat in the Ecclesiastical Commission, ['tis the Question,]

No Question was put upon the Earl of Rochester.

The Earl of Sunderland was excepted by Vote.

On the Bishop of Durham (fn. 3).

Sir Robert Howard.] The Bishop has gone through stitch with all the Commissioners. He understood little Law, and less Gospel, but he was an ecclesiastical knowing man, who gave Counsel to the Lay Lords. He went through all the Commissions, and in the last Commission of such an exorbitant Nature, where every Man's Estate, Liberty, and Wise, were at their disposal. I was a Trustee for the Duke of Norfolk—In that Court he took great consideration of the Dutchess. In that Court he gave her more than the Marriage Settlement. This Prelate stuck to this Commission, from first to last, with equal Violence.

He was excepted.

On the Bishop of Rochester (fn. 4).

Sir William Pulteney.] It is known to most how this Bishop behaved himself. He was intreated by the Bishop of London to stay in the Commission. He protected the Protestant Religion, and I cannot reckon him so highly criminal.

Mr Arnold.] I wonder that the Bishop, when we consider the worthy Book he writ, the History of the Plot, should find Advocates here.

Sir Robert Cotton.] He was a Friend to the University and the Vice-Chancellor. He argued the injustice and unreasonableness of the Proceedings of the Commissioners. He opposed every thing in the Proceedings against Magdalen-College.

Mr Baldwin.] There is this farther to be said, that he deserted the Ecclesiastical Commission wholly, when they proceeded against Magdalen-College, and wrote a Book against it.

Mr Dolben.] He acted with great Zeal for the Protestant Religion. He never gave his consent to one Vote or Decree of that Commission against the Protestant Religion. He made it his Business to defend it. Except acting in that Commission, he is guilty of no fault.

On Lord Chief Justice Herbert.

Mr Howe.] You have excepted him once; he is put into the Bill of Attainder. I would not worry a man that is gone out of the Kingdom.

Mr Smith.] You cannot vindicate the Justice of the Nation, if you take no notice of him, when three witnesses have sworn, that he is in Ireland, and he is put into the Bill of Attainder.

Mr Howe.] Something is to be said in his behalf. He left his place, because he would not give his Judgment against the Deserters.

Lord Chief Justice Herbert was not excepted.

On the second Ecclesiastical Commission.

On the Earl of Mulgrave (fn. 5).

Mr Howe.] Nobody can think I can have had long acquaintance with this Lord, but I have been well informed that all his life he has voted for his Country's Interest, though he was in Court. He came in to the Government in the late Change, and did this King service. Let him pass.

Mr Smith.] His name is in the last Commission, and I know those Injuries you have heard have been from those Commissioners. If it appears that he was in the Business of Magdalen-College, I am not for excusing him. Let his Quality be ever so great, if the Country be concerned, I would not except him. Let any Gentleman tell what he has done for the good of the Nation, and I am for excusing him.

Col. Austen.] I stand not up to excuse him; but from a great Clergyman I have had it, that he stood for the Protestant Religion.

Sir William Williams.] If any Member can say he was more active than some you have excused, I would not pass him by. You find nothing in the Books of this man's Actions. I would pass him by.

Sir John Guise.] I have heard of good things he has done; he stood for us in the House of Lords for the good of the Nation.

Mr Howe.] This Lord is not charged for acting, but for taking the Commission. He may pretend to as much favour as another.

He was not excepted.

On the Earl of Huntingdon (fn. 6).

Mr Carter.] I hope this Lord will not appear to be the greatest Offender. He came in to act in this Commission when the Lawyers and Bishops thought it safe to act. He was well assured before he acted, and advised with several Lawyers, who gave him Encouragement to proceed. (He was called upon to name those Lawyers) He dissented in divers things that they acted against the Church; and before the Bishop of Rochester came in, he dissented. I move, That he may not be excepted in the Bill.

Mr Harbord.] I could tell a Story of this Lord, how that three days after the Prince of Orange landed at Torbay, he went post to Plymouth, to take Possession of it, to keep the Prince out with his Regiment, which was then quartered there.

Mr Smith.] It is strange to see how prettily we are turned off from what was proposed. Because this Lord was in the last, and not in the first Commission, therefore now some would excuse him.

Sir John Guise.] I am for the series of the Inclinations of men. This Lord was once a great Patriot. He acted in the three last Ecclesiastical Commissions. He did go through Devonshire to raise the Country against this King, and has done no service since: Surely you will not exempt him for that.

Mr Smith.] If one Gentleman will name his Bishops that advised this Lord, Carter can name the Lawyers.

The Earl of Huntingdon, and the Bishop of Chester (fn. 7); were excepted.

On Sir Thomas Jenner.

Mr Smith.] I know not if Ignorance and Poverty may be an exemption from Punishment; if it be an excuse for this man, he may claim it.

Sir Jonathan Jennings.] He was so troublesome in the Ecclesiastical Commission at Magdalen-College, that the Bishop of Chester and the Judges thought to put him out. He was excepted.

The Compiler went out of Town some days before the end of this Session (fn. 8), [which was on August 20, when both Houses, by his Majesty's pleasure, adjourned themselves to September 20,] and from thence to


  • 1. Mr Samuel Johnson. (who had been Chaplain to Lord Russel) setting forth An humble and hearty Address to all the English Protestants in the Army &c was prosecuted for it in the King's Bench, and being convicted, was sentenced to stand in the Pillory three times, and to be whipped from Newgate to Tyburn, which no Martyr ever did suffer with more fortitude than he. Ralph.
  • 2. Sancroft lay silent at Lambeth. He seemed zealous against Popery, in private discourse, but he was of such a timorous temper, and so set on the enriching his Nephew, that he showed no sort of courage. He would not go to this Court, when it was first opened, and declare against it, and give his reasons why he could not sit and act in it, judging it to be against Law: But he contented himself with not going to it. Burnet.
  • 3. Nathaniel Lord Crew. He was lifted up with the Ecclesiastical Commission, and said, "Now his name would be recorded in History." And, when some of his Friends represented to him the Danger of acting in a Court so illegally constituted, he said, "He could not live, if he should lose the King's gracious smiles." So low and fawning was he. At the Revolution he absconded for some time, and was waiting for a Ship to get beyond sea, fearing public Affronts, and had offered to resign his Bishoprick, but was prevailed on to go to the House, and by voting the new Settlement to merit at least a pardon for all that he had done. Burnet.
  • 4. Dr Sprat, justly esteemed a great Master of our Language, and one of our correctest writers. He died in 1713. Burnet.
  • 5. Lord Chamberlain to King James, and afterwards Duke of Buckingham. He was apt to comply in every thing that he thought might be acceptable; for he went with the King to Mass, and kneeled at it. And being looked on as indifferent to all Religions, the Priests made an attack on him. He heard them gravely arguing for Transubstantiation. He told them, "He was willing to receive Instruction: He had taken much pains to bring himself to believe in God, who made the World and all men in it: But it must not be an ordinary force of Argument that could make him believe that man was quits with God, and made God again." Burnet.
  • 6. One of King James's Privy-Council, and Colonel of a Regiment. He died in 1701.
  • 7. Dr Cartwright. He was a man of good Capacity, and had made some Progress in Learning. He was ambitious and servile, cruel and boisterous: And, by the great Liberties he allowed himself, he fell under much scandal of the worst sort. He had set himself, long to raise the King's Authority above Law; "which (he said) was only a method of Government to which Kings might submit as they pleased; but their Authority was from God, absolute and superior to Law, which they might exert as often as they found it necessary for the ends of Government," So he was looked on as a man that would more effectually advance the design of Popery, than if he should turn over to it: And indeed, bad as he was, he never made that step, even in the most desperate state of his affairs. He, Wright, and Jenner, were the three Ecclesiastical Commissioners for visiting Magdalen College, and he (in particular) acted in so rough a manner, that it showed he was resolved to sacrifice all things to the King's Pleasure. Burnet.
  • 8. It appears from the Journal, that Mr Anchitell Grey had leave from the House, the next day July 2, to go into the Country for a Month.