Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 11, 1660-1666. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
DIE Martis, 26 die Maii.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:
Nuttall against Newport's Bill.
Upon hearing the Counsel of John Newport Esquire and Richard Nuttall, and the Witnesses on both Sides, at this Bar, concerning the Matter contained in the Bill depending before this House, to enable the said John Newport to enter into certain Messuages lying in Westm.:
And, after some Debate thereof, it is ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Lord Chief Justice of England shall be attended with the said Bill, who is desired to call such other of the Judges as conveniently he can to his Assistance and consider of the said whole Bill, whether there be any Thing therein repugnant or contrary to the Act of Judicial Proceedings; and afterwards his Lordship is to make Report thereof unto this House.
Langham and Proger, in Error.
This Day the Lord Chief Justice of England brought into this House, in the usual Manner, His Majesty's Writ of Error, granted to William Langham, and likewise delivered in the Record and Process between the said Langham and Proger, and delivered the said Writ of Error and a Transcript of the said Proceedings unto the Lord Chancellor; who acquainted the House therewith.
Whereupon it is ORDERED, That the said Langham, Plaintiff in the said Writ of Error, shall assign his Errors by Saturday next, the Thirtieth of this Instant May; and that this House will hear Counsel on both Sides, to argue the said Errors, at this Bar, on Tuesday the Second Day of June next: And hereof the Parties concerned are to have timely Notice, and attend the said Hearing accordingly.
Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque in diem crastinum, videlicet, 27um diem instantis Maii, hora decima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.