Historical Collections: 1638 (3 of 5)

Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 2, 1629-38. Originally published by D Browne, London, 1721.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.


John Rushworth, 'Historical Collections: 1638 (3 of 5)', in Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 2, 1629-38, (London, 1721) pp. 805-820. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rushworth-papers/vol2/pp805-820 [accessed 21 May 2024].

John Rushworth. "Historical Collections: 1638 (3 of 5)", in Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 2, 1629-38, (London, 1721) 805-820. British History Online, accessed May 21, 2024, https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rushworth-papers/vol2/pp805-820.

Rushworth, John. "Historical Collections: 1638 (3 of 5)", Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 2, 1629-38, (London, 1721). 805-820. British History Online. Web. 21 May 2024, https://www.british-history.ac.uk/rushworth-papers/vol2/pp805-820.

In this section

Sir John Banks his Reply about the Censure of my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, and Mr. Osbaldston, the 14th of February, in the Star-Chamber, 1638.

Interlocutory Passages.

'My Lords, The Defendents Counsel in their defence, does except against the Charge of the Information, and they laboured much to tie the Matters charged in the Information to the very day of the Month, seeking thereby to escape the Charge, contrary to their Judgments and the common course of Justice.

'Also they made question where those Letters should be found: but if they will, they may know that they were found at my Lord Bishop of Lincoln's House at Bugden, as is manifest by their own Witnesses Interrogatories. 1. & 71.

'In the answer to which Interrogatories, three Witnesses do all say, That they heard they were found in a Band-box in my Lord of Lincoln's Wardrobe.

Mr. Recorder.

'My Lords, We have examined four Witnesses, which do all depose, That there were no Letters found in the Band-Box, and that his Lordship did never leave any Letters to be kept there.

Mr. Herbert.

'It appears by their own Witnesses, that there were such Letters found; but this is not to the purpose where they were found, but now they are found, the hainousess of them is the point in hand.

Lord Keeper.

'It may be that some of the Lords may find some things in the Depositions that may serve one way or other, therefore I think it good they should be read; but for my own part, I am satisfied in my judgment.

Mr. Attorney General further proceeded, saying;

'My Lords, the Defendents Counsel have made two Defences, one for Mr. Osbaldson, and the other for the Bishop of Lincoln.

'The Counsel for Mr. Osbaldston except against the Witnesses that prove the interpretation of the Letters, and would have Mr. Osbaldston to expound his own meaning, and if this should be allowed, every Libeller would thereby escape the Censure of the Court.

'First, They except against Cadwallader Powel, because he was before sentenced in the Star-chamber : But, my Lords, his Censure in the Star-chamber was not for any matter of Perjury, or Crime that should take away his Testimony; and the same thing for which he was sentenced, was my Lord Bishop himself Sentenced at the very same time.

'Secondly, The second Exception was, that Mr. Powel and Mr. Walker were made Defendents in this Court to take away their Testimony in this Cause, and the reason why they were not proceeded against (said the King's Attorney) was my Lords, because my Lord Bishop of Lincoln would not perfect his Examination, by which we should have the better proceeded against them, and when my Lord Bishop hath perfeceted his Examination, they shall be proceeded against.

'Again, They except and say, that Walker, being Secretary to my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, he ought not to be Witness against my Lord of Lincoln.

'My Lords, when a Secretary is call'd examined upon Oath he ought to discover the truth of what he is examin'd upon, and not to perjure himself.

'Again, they say, that there are no express words in the Letters, whereby it doth certainly appear, that these words were not meant of my Lords Grace of Canterbury.

'My Lords, this sticks at all Causes of Justice: for if they shall be suffered to interpret their own words, by this means all Libellers would escape punishment.

'The third part of the Defence is this: That Mr. Osbaldston should call Doctor Spicer, Vermin, Hocus Pocus, Vrchin, and the like: therefore say they, those terms in these Letters are not to be applied to the Archbishop of Canterbury, but to Dr. Spicer. This is no exclusion, for I shall shew that those words must needs be intended and spoken against the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, and not of Dr. Spicer.

'In the Letter of the 9th of Jan. the words cannot be applied to be spoken of so mean a Man as Dr. Spicer: and so likewise in the Letter of the 30th of Jan. wherein he desires, that it should be kept secret: and if these words had been spoken of Dr. Spicer, they needed not be kept so secret. For Hocus Pocus and Vermin being spoken of Dr. Spicer, were published in Westminster Hall, and other places thereabouts, and therefore needed no secresie.

'And that by the great Leviathan, it should be understood to be meant of the Lord Richardson there is no colour for it, my Lords.

'As for Osbaldston, he hath long been a turbulent Medler, and a false Intelligencer of the Affairs of State; I may say he is Hocus Pocus, and a Jugler in the Affairs of State; and yet I am sorry that I shall charge him with that which is worse than the Charge laid against him in the Information, for he is guilty of gross and wilful Perjury, for he hath denied upon Oath that which was plainly proved against him.

'Another Argument is, This Osbaldston is now run away, which in our sensedoth shew a guiltiness of the Offence. 25 H. 5. One being indicated for Felony, if he runs away, he then forseits his Goods.

'As for my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, he stands upon three things.

'First, That he received not the Letters.

'Secondly, That he did not publish them.

'Thirdly, That he did not entertain them.

'For the first, It is proved by Witnesses, That two days after 'Twelve-tide he gave order that his Letters should be opened that concerned his Law Suits, so that thereby he might colour the Matter, that they might not come into his own Hands. Again, he doth not say, That he did not receive the Letter of the 9th of January, besides his own Letter of the second of January, makes mention of three Letters which he received from Mr. Osbaldston : In one of which he should contribute Mony to the use of the Lord Treasurer for the ruin of the little great Man : So that it is confessed by his own Writings that he did receive them. And the Letter of the 30th of January was sent by a special Messenger to Lincoln therefore it is most probable that he received it, and your Lordships have heard Cadwallader Powel say, That my Lord of Lincoln demanding of him, Whether any of Osbaldston 's Letters were found? And he answering that they were. Then said the Bishop, Osbaldston is undone: So that I conceive your Lordships will not think, but that his Lordship received the Letters.

'But it is objected, That this is no Offence; For, say they, it's no Offence to receive Libellous Letters, and to keep them private. And as for my Lord of Lincoln, he did never publish any of them; and there is difference betwixt Osbaldston 's Case, and my Lord Bishop of Lincoln 's, for they were only sent to my Lord of Lincoln, but he did never contrive nor publish any of them.

'It is evident that he did publish these, for they were spoken of by Powel and Walker, and the Women did talk of them in the Market.

'But they say, That some of his Attendants never heard him publish any such Speeches at his own Table.

'It is like he did not make it his Table-Talk: But, my Lords, under favour, my Lord of Lincoln hath bin too forward to entertain and publish libellous Letters.

'If any recieve libellous Letters, the receiving is not a publishing of them, as it is in 9 Report. fol. 59.

'In the 5th Report, there is difference betwixt Words and Letters, which concern a private Man and a publick Officer

'If they do concern a private Man, it is no offence in him that conceals them: but if they concern a publick Officer, he that doth conceal them, is guilty, and shall be punished for a Libeller.

'And I conceive my Lord of Lincoln to be guilty of Perjury in this Cause; and, my Lord, that Perjuries are punishable in this Court, (though they are not charged in the Information) doth appear, Hill. 2. Eliz. & Hill. 4. Eliz.

'My Lords, I do wish that this Age that is so much infected with devising and divulging scandalous Letters and Words, that some exemplary Example might be made, that we might hear no more of such scandalous Matters.

'My Lords, before the Conquest they had very strict Laws against Libellers, (as to have their Tongues slit); And in the time of Ed. I. and Ed. 2. there were special Commissioners appointed to enquire after Libellers, as in the close Roll. Parliament, and so I humbly leave them to your Lordships.

'The Court proceeding to Sentence, declared in general, 'That they had received satisfaction that Mr. Osbaldston was the Contricer, Writer, and Publisher of those odious Appellations of those two great Personhs. That his Defence was reidiculous, and that his End was the ruin of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'As for the Bishop of Lincoln, they said, He was a Person of Quality, Parts, and Abilities, and one that once sat as Judge in this Court: That he shewed himself very indiscreet in concealing those Letters, and had thereby made himself guilty of a high Crime.

But for further satisfaction, take these Speeches following made in Court at the said Censure.

Sir John Finch, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, spake first, the Lord Cottington being absent.

My Lords,
'There are two Defendents, so there are two Charges in the Information against them.

'First, they are charged with giving Nick-names unto two Honourable Persons of this Realm.

'Secondly, They are charged to Plot, and contrive to work an utter ruin and overthrow to my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury. And in those Charges, I shall observe several steps and degrees,

'First, An Endeavour and Agreement between Osbaldston and my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, to reproach and scandalize these two Noble Persons.

'Secondly, A publishing and divulging the same.

'In the second Charge I observe these Steps.

'First a false Rumour raised by them.

'Secondly, A publishing of the same.

'Thirdly, An endeavour to work the ruin of teh Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, by contributing Charges to effect the same.

'And how far Osbaldston and the Bishop of Lincoln are guilty, I appeal to your Lordships. I shall now shew the extent of the Information, the Charge being laid to be in or about the 10th of February, M. 9 Car. Which Charge doth comprehend all libellous Letters, either before or since 9 Car.

'But it's true, if in the Letters will not appear that sense which is contained in the Charge, then they shall not be within the Charge of the Information, and therefore the Information admits of as much favour to the Desendents as may be: For this Court doth ratehr desire to find Men Innocent than Guilty.

'I shall now come to the Particulars, and shall herein observe teh course of teh Desendents Counsel, who have distinguished my Lord of Lincoln's Case from Osbaldston's, and so shall put a difference between them: For though Osbaldston be quilty, yet it's possible that my Lord of Lincoln may not be guilty.

'And as for Osbaldston, I hold him as clearly guilty of the Charges in the Information, as any have bin sentenced in this Court.

'For first, Osbaldston was the Contriver and Publisher of those scandalous Letters; and I think there is no doubt at all, but that they were meant of the late Lord Treasurer, and teh now Lord Bishop of Canterbury.

'Secondly, Your Lordships may observe, what interpretation the Lord Bishop of Lincoln would make of them: How that my Lord of Lincoln himself did conceive that he meant the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'The third is by Witnesses.

'First, Walker said, That he saw divers Letters wherein Osbaldstou explained his meaning, That he meant my Lord Treasurer, and my Lord's Grace of Canterbury.

'Again he faith, He saw some Letters wherein Osbaldston used by words, which my Lord of Lincoln did not understand until Osbaldston had explained them.

'Again he faith, His Lordship did explain many of these dark Words that Osbaldston wrote unto him, shewing that he meant my Lord's Grace of Canterbury.

'Again he faith, That Osbaldston spoke base words of the Arch-Bishop.

'And these be his Reasons why he conceives, that by the Words in the Letters he means the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury; which I conceive be bery good and sufficient Reasons.

'The second Witness is Cadwallader Powel, who faith, He used these words in a Letter, The little Vermin, the false Mediator, the Hocus Pocus. And the Bishop of Lincoln being in the Tower, demanded of Powel, Whether any of Mr. Osbaldston's Letters were found? who answered, That they were found; Then, said teh Bishop, Osbaldston is undone.

'Thus I have thought good to make a difference betwixt my Lord of Lincoln and Mr. Osbaldston; for it is consessed by my Lord of Lincoln, that by one of those is meant my Lord Treasurer; but that shall not convict Mr. Osbaldston, but it is plain by his own words what he meant. And that by those words should be meant Dr. Spicer, I hold it so ridiculous a Defence, that I think he could not have deceived his School-Boys with it.

'And that by Leviathan should be meant my Lord Richardson, there is no colour for that; for though Dr. Spicer were confounded, what would the King or State suffer by his ruin or confusion? so that certainly it is meant of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'For Mr. Osbaldston's going away, it is not judicially known unto me, and therefore leave it to your Lordships.

'And as for the second Charge, That he did Plot and Contrive for the ruin of the Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, I hold that he is guilty, and that he did stir my Lord of Lincoln to contribute Mony for that purpose.

'For my Lord of Lincoln, I shall only say this, That the Letter of the 9th of January is such a turbulent and scandalous Libel, that a Man of Place and Quality should not give any way thereunto; but that he should receive it, entertain it, and publish it, this shews that he had long a rancor and hatred towards my Lord Arch-Bishop.

'And for the Nick-names, I shall find my Lord of Lincoln guilty as far forth as Mr. Osbaldston, for he did entertain these Letters, and did publish them, and it was an Agreement and consederacy so to do.

'By way of Defence, my Lord Bp of Lincoln's Counsel did allege;

'First, That there was an Agreement between Osbaldston and my Lord of Lincoln. Again, they said, That there was no certain Appellation of my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'Secondly, There was proof that my Lord of Lincoln did not speak any such Words at his Table.

'Thirdly, They endeavoured to prove, That my Lord of Lincoln never wrote any Letters containing any libellous Matter; when-as there was a Letter under his own Hand, which he would not consess, although he was brought like a Bear to the Stake, and three times examined about it.

'Again they said, That he did not receive them, and yet he wrote an answer to them.

'Again, Admit he did receive them, yet he did not publish them, but only delivered them to Mr. Walker his Secretary.

'Mr. Attorney well remembred the Law, That if a libellous Letter concerning a private Person, then he may conceal it; but if it concern a publick Officer, then the concealing of it makes him guilty thereof: And that the Letters were published is most certain, for they were openly spoken of by Women in the Market.

'Another thing of Mr. Recorder's was this; That if my Lord Bishop of Lincoln did understand Osbaldston's meaning, yet he did not understand that he meant my Lord Treasurer, and my Lord's Grace of Canterbury.

'Then, I say, He hath scandalized my Lord Treasurer, and my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury; for by his own Writing he faith, That it was meant of these Persons.

The next is, the charge of a Plot laid for the ruin of my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, but I will not condemn my Lord Bishop of Lincoln for that.

'The next Defence of Mr. Recorder was from this, That Mr. Osbaldston wrote to the Bishop of Lincoln, saying, I hope you will pick out the meaning, &c. so that there was no Consederacy and Agreement between them.

'First, I say, He received the Letters, and published them.

'Secondly, He was so far from nipping these Scandals in the Buds, that he enquired further after them.

'Thirdly, That he was ready and willing to contribute Mony towards the ruin of my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'I am sorry tha a Man of his Rank and Condition, should make himself Companion with a School-master.

'And as for the Asperson which they cast upon Mr. Walker, to take away his Testimony, I see no just cause thereof.

'For they said, Either his Deposition is impossible and beyond his knowledge, or else that his Reasons that moved him thereunto, are insufficient. But for my part I know not how a better Reason can be given.

'Another Objection against Walker is this, That it was long before these Letters were brought forth; and that these are not all, but there should be a third Letter.

'I say, It is a wonder that so many were brought forth now. But that they had bin lost, or that my Lord of Lincoln had burnt them: for had I a Friend that I professed so much kindness to, as he did to Osbaldston, I should be very sorry that he should suffer for his Letters.

'For the Testimony of Cadwallader Powel, I hold his Testimony as fit to be taken as my Lord Bishop of Lincoln.

'And for the Charge of the Desendents Counsel, for the subtil prosecution by the Sollicitor Kilvert, I shall say little, I know him to be of a good Carriage in other Businesses, therefore if any fault be, I shall only desire that it may be amended for the time to come. I hold that these Witness stand upright; and as for the other Witnesses, I submit unto your Lordships, for in Sentence I must consider the nature of the Cause, and the Persons.

'First, I shall not acquit my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, nor condemn him so much as Osbaldston.

'i must consider teh Persons offending, and the Persons against whom they have offended.

'For the Persons offended, the first is the Lord Treasurer of England, one of his Majesty's Privy-Council.

'And the second is the Metropolitan of England, who hath ever carried himself with great trust and sidelity towards his Majesty and the Publick Good.

'And i verily think, that none can accuse him of the least corruption. In a Court where most Causes of the Clergy are tried, I did never receive any private Message from his Lordship in the behalf of any Clergy Man, which is a thing to be much observed in him.

'For Mr. Osbaldston, he hath bin a Parson, a Prebend, and a School-master. My Lords, I will not suffer him, he is so turbulent a Person, and scandalous Libeller, to teach and instruct others. I would have him therefore deprived of all his Spiritual Dignities and Promotions, that he never have any place in the Church; neitehr hold I it fit that he should teach Scholars, (should I do him justice, I should adjudge him some severe corporal Punishment): I would have him deprived in the High-Commission Court, and then to be set on the Pillory in this Palace-Yard. And that he may be an Example to his Boys, I would have him also to stand in the Pillory in teh Deans-Yard, and one Ear to be nailed in the Palace, and the other Ear to be nailed in the Deans-Yard.

'i do fine him five thousand pounds, and imprisonment during the King's Pleasure.

'And I do fine my Lord Bishop of Lincoln five thousand pounds.

'And I give to my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, five thousand pounds' a piece for Damages.

My Lord Chief Justice Bramston's Speech.

My Lords,
'There are two Desendents, and they have made two Defences. I find my Lord Bishop of Lincoln t be guilty, though not so full, and in so high a nature as Mr. Osbaldston.

'They are charged to Plot and Consederate together, to scandalize two Honourable Persons, and to raise Discord in the State, and to seek the ruin and overthrow of my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

Osbaldston wrote a Letter of the 9th of January, and other Letters, which my Lord Bishop of Lincoln is charged with to receive and publish.

'That Osbaldston is guilty of every part of the Charge, I shall not need to make any question; neither shall I much stand upon the validity of the Witnesses, for I see nothing but that he is guilty of all the Charge.

'I will begin with the first Letter of the 9th of January, in which he would have two other Persons meant there, and not my Lord Treasurer, and my Lord's Grace of Canterbury; but the one to be meant my Lord Richardson, and the other Doctor Spicer.

'Now what comparison was there between those two Persons?

'The one was Lord Chief Justice, and as for the other, every one knows what he is; so that it cannot be meant of these two Person, for three is no comparison between them.

'And for these words, the little medling Hocus Pocus works his own confusion, &c. How would this be meant of Dr. Spicer? For how did Dr. Spicer work his own Confusion? And who would give so much to consound Dr. Spicer? He is no such eminent Person, that any should give so much to confound him. So that this Letter is very clear against Osbaldston.

'And it shews a petulent Spirit, and an inveterate hatred and malice, that he did long bear against my Lord of Canterbury, without any reason or cause at all, for he doth not shew that he had ever received any wrong or injury from his Grace.

'I come now to the other Letter, wherein Osbaldston writ to teh Bishop of Lincol to contribute Charges to my Lord Treasurer, for the ruin of the littel great Man; by which must needs be meant the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury: so that i shall not stand longer upon Mr. Osbaldston; for is there were no Witnesses against him, yet I find Matter enough in his own Letters to prove him guilty of the whole Charge, and therefore I sentence him with my Lord Finch.

'For my Lord of Lincoln, i cannot sentence him as a Libeller, for there must be either a contriving or a publishing to make a Man a Libeller, as Mr. Recorder well observed.

'But I find him guilty of this Charge, That he received the libellous Letters; and of this Charge, That he assented to contribute Mony for the ruin of my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'But it is objected, That he concealed the Libel, and therefore he is not guilty.

'The concealing of it doth not clear my Lord Bishop of Lincoln.

'For (as Mr. Attorny well observed) there is a difference between a Letter that concerns a private Person, and a public Officer.

'If a libellous Letter concern a private Person, he that receives it may conceal it in his Pocket, or burn it; but if it concern a public Person, he ought to reveal it to some public Officer or Magistrate.

'But it is true, if he divulge it to any but to a Magistrate, he is a Libeller; and why should my Lord of Lincoln keep these Letters by him, but to the end to publish them, and to have them at all times in a readiness to publish upon every occasion?

'For his being degraded; I leave it to those of the Ecclesiastical Court, to whom it doth belong.

'And for the otehr part of his Sentence of the Pillory, I am very sorry and unwilling to give such a Sentence upon any Man of his Calling and Degree. But when I consider the Quality of the Person, and how much it doth aggravate the Offence, I cannot tell how to spare him: for thes considerations that should mitigate, makes the Offence the greater, which makes me join with my Lord Finch in that part also.

'For my Lord of Lincoln, I do fine him three thousand pounds, and Imprisonment.

'And seeing the Offence is against so Honourable a Person as my Lord's Grace of Canterbury, and there is not the least cause of any aggrievance or wrong tahat he hath done to my Lord of Lincoln, therefore in Damage I join with my Lord Finch.

'Secretary Windebanck, and Secretary Cook, did both join with my Lord Brampston for the Bishop of Lincoln, and with my Lord Finch for Mr. Osbaldston.

Mr. Comptroller his Speech.

My Lords,
'For Osbaldston, considering his place, I cannot but condemn him very much, for by what hath bin alledged, I verily believe that he did mean my Lord Treasurer, and my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury: And my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, and Mr. Osbaldston, are both huilty of Crimes in a high nature; one would have thought that my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, being a Person of that Place and Quality, should not have run himself into such danger as to have meddled with such Matters; for had he not met with good Counsel, I conceive that he had plunged himself in as deep as Osbaldston in these practices.

'And as for Osbaldston's Sentence, I agree with my Lord Finch.

'And for my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, I hold with my Lord Brampstone.

'As for my Lord Canterbury his Carriage, it is well known to be upright, and therefore I leave it.

The Lord Newburgh his Speech.

My Lords,
For Oshaldston, I find him guilty of every part of the Charge; for the other I cannot sentence so deep; for I think my Lord of Lincoln is not guilty of the Plotting and Consederating, for teh scandalizing of those two honourable Person; I leave it to your Lordships Judgment, and lay all the Charge upon Oshaldston.

The Earl of Dorset's Speech at the Sentence of Mr. Osbaldston.

'A Ristotle in his Politicks, admits not in the Government, of any School-master to the exercise of Civil Duties, School-master commonly proving the Apes of Tyranny; and being used to imperiousness over Scholars, if you put a Sword of Justice into his Hand, you may easily guess how he will lay about him in the State and City.

'I know not with what spirit of Vanity this School-master was possessed, but we see the monstrous birth of it; if the Pedant had kept within his Rules, he might have bin taught not to have disturbed Government. Look upon this Pragmatical Person, and behold the FAct, and what were the Motives, what the Reasons to bring himself upon the Stage.

'His ill thoughts exprest in Ink as black as his Crime; his Pen was steep'd in Vinegar and Gall. What was it that stain'd the Bishop of Lincoln's Ear with the poison of ignominious Titles? It was the Pedant. Who was it, that as a Thief that had stollen another's good name away, cries, Burn my Letters, on purpose to go in darkness of the night? It was a Parson. Who was it that endeavoured to stain teh purity of my Lord Arch-Bishop's Honour with soul aspersions of Titles, little Grace, little Vrchin, Vermin &c. It was Mr. Osbaldston.

'Well, I will speak what I think, I fear none but God and the King, and I speak in truth, I am sure I shall offend neither of them. I have enquired of them who are learned in the Laws, who say, That the plainest Sense is to be taken. The Divines will tell you, That the easy Places shall explain the more obscure. And if any Man would examine those Letters, and with judicious comparing the Title of little Grace with the other, he will be forced to consess the sense of the other, or else be blind at noon-day.

'But as Truth may be cleared by strong and solid Reason, so it may be darkned and shadowed by the colours of probability of appearances.

'But, my Lords, I think the School-master alleges his Services to the Common-Wealth, and his being slighted for it; That he hath bin these many Years, and dedicated his Pains and Time for the good of the Flowers of the kingdom, Generosa debentur. But I will consider him as a Man subject to his Passion, (which to take away, were to take away the Man himself): I will allow him his Infirmities, but observe a little his Envy, see his Merits and Deserts, which he hath so souly abused, with the height of insolency and bold access, to the very Secrets of Empire and Government, to the disgrace of those Men of which the Common-Wealth consists. I know not, (my Lords) the Fault of the Man may transport my Speech that I abuse your Patience; but I shall give my censure of him; I learn'd in the university, how that a Syllogism doth ever follow the worst part, sequitur deteriorem ad partem, I am sure his Letter doth: he might have found a better medium to make up a Syllogism of a Libel, for he hath concluded in the worst Body of all the Figures, viz. in Bocardo: so I must concur with my Lord Finch in censure.

'As for my Lord of Lincoln, linked in this Cause, I honour the Man for many Causes, in many Relations, but for his Secretary Walker, and the Clerk of his Kitchin, and the rest (where-ever the Letters were found); they have dealt like Acteon's Hound, that turned against and devoured his Master; the false Secretary, the unjust Steward, and the unlawful Clerk of the Kitchin, who were sed at my Lord Bishop of Lincoln's Table in his prosperity, and now in his adversity they fall upon their Master to devour him. I must say of him, he hath forgotten himself, and afree to teh Censure which the Lord Chief Justice Bramstone hath given against him. He did not as Peter did. when he had denied his Master, go our and weep bitterly for his offence; but he justifies himself, and therefore he is fallen into the Lime-twigs of his Adversary.

The Earl of Arundel's Speech.

My Lords,
'For Osbaldston, I find him guilty of every part of the Charge; and that he is not sentenced in a higher nature is, causa de bona fortuna, for had he bin suffered to have persisted in his course, he had surely into a most dangerous Error.

'And therefore I join in Sentence for him with my Lord Finch.

'am sorry for my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, he hath shewed him self very indiscreet, being a Person of Place and Quality, he now falls low in his Estate and Dignity; and these things will make his Spirit fall lower than his Body; and therefore I agree in all things with my Lord Finch.

Marquess Hamilton his Speech.

My Lords,
'For Osbaldston, I find him guilty of the whole Charge. For my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, I cannot find him to deeply guilty as Osbaldston. But certainly my Lord's Grace of Canterbury hath bin exceedingly wronger. Therefore I give Damages with my Lord Finch.

'And for Osbaldston, I sentence him with my Lord Finch.

'And as for my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, I join with my Lord Brampston.

The Earl of Manchester, Lord Privy-Seal, his Speech.

My Lords,
'For Osbaldston, if you take his Words, his Meaning, and the End, they will appear to be very heinous.

'First, His Words, to bring contempt and disgrace upon my Lord Bishop fo Canterbury.

'Secondly, His Meaning is expressed in the words themselves, to be against two Honourable Persons.

'Thirdly, And for the End, that was most dangerous and pernicicus. It was to overthrow and work the consusion and ruin of my Lord's Grace of Canterbury.

'Setting aside all the Witnesses, I will condemn my Lord Bishop of Lincoln out of his own Mouth, for he denies all.

'First, He denies the receiving of the Letters.

'Secondly, The entertaining of them.

'Thirdly, The publishing of them.

'Not as Peter did when he had denied his Master, to go out and weep bitterly for his Offence, but to justify himself: Yet how can my Lord of Lincoln deny the Letter that he wrote with his own hand, and yet he will not consess it to be his own Letter.

'And after he was Prisoner in the Tower, he called to Mr. Cadwallader Powel, and demanded if any of Mr. Osbaldston's Letters were found? Who answered, That they were found. Then said the Bishop, Osbaldston is undone.

'Secondly, He desired that they should be kept close and secret.

'Thirdly, Though they were kept close, and only put into the Pocket, if they concern a publick Person, he is a Libeller.

'For Osbaldston, besides all the corporal Punishment, I hold sit that he should acknowledge his Offence in writing to my Lord's Grace of Canterbury.

'And as for the Bishop of Lincoln, I hold that he should also make an acknowledgment in writing to the Arch-Bishop, for he is a Person of great Place and Quality. And my Lord of Lincoln is under Canonical Obedience to the Arch-Bishop by his Oath; and Disobedience is a breach of his Oath; therefore he should acknowledge his Offence under his own hand.

'For my Lord's Grace of Canterbury, he hath ever carried himself with much Gravity in his Place, and Piety towards God and the King, and the public Good; therefore I leave him in honour as I found him, and Sentence the Bishop of Lincoln with my Lord Bramstone; and Osbaldston with my Lord Finch.

'The Earl of Holland joined in Sentence with my Lord Finch for Osbaldston, and with my Lord Bramstone for the Bishop of Lincoln.

The Lord Keeper his Speech.

My Lords,
If I be not mistaken, it is mispending of time in opening teh Cause, therefore I shall use as much brevity as may be.

'And, first, I shall begin with the first Letter, and think it fit that this Letter, and all the Copies thereof, should be suppressed.

'Yet I may make this use of it. Tha Osbaldston and my Lord Bishop had a long time continued intercourse of writing scandalous Letters, and false News.

'Again, I make this use of it, That my Lord of Lincoln having received such a Letter so scandalous against the Kind and State, did conceal the same.

'My Lords, For the Letter of the 9th of January, my Lord Bishop of Lincoln doth deny that he received it; and therefore I think that he conceived it to be a scandalous Letter, which made him to deny it.

'Again, He kept the Letters by him, that he might have the words ready to tell unto every one at his Pleasure.

'It was the saying of one that was late Lord Chancellor, That he never like a Cause, where there were divers Answers in it; neither can I like this, when my Lord Bishop of Lincoln hath been so often examined, and will not make a perfect Answer, for he hath thrice bin examined upon this Letter, which is a shrewd Argument unto me, that he knew well that there was scandalous Matter contained it it.

'Next, my Lords, is the publishing of these libellous Letters, and I think it very fit that my Lord of Lincoln should be charged with the publishing of them. If they were in the Band-Box, then that was a publishing of them; and he delivered a Letter to his Secretary, which was a publishing thereof.

'But it's true, If a Man deliver a Letter to his Secretary, and command that he should keep it secret, I conceive that is not a publishing of it.

'If there were no other proof but this, I should think my Lord Bishop of Lincoln and Mr. Osbaldston to be guilty, not only of contriving, but also of publishing and divulging scandalous Libels against the Lord Arch-Bishops of Canterbury, and the State.

'As for Witnesses, although there is no need, (for it is plain without Witnesses) yet there be divers Witnesses that prove it.

Now it remains that I should proceed to Censure.

It concerns the late Lord Treasurer, one of his Majesty's Privy-Council, and my Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, two Honourable Persons: And my Lord Arch-Bishop had not only bin a Friend to the Bishop of Lincoln, but a faithful Mediator fro him to his Majesty, and was always very faithful in returning his Majesty's Answer unto him; and yet notwithstanding all this, my Lord of Lincoln hath done many heinous Offences against the said Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.

'For Osbaldston his Censure, I agree with my Lord Finch, and do add therunto, confession of the offence, and Submission.

'And for my Lord Bishop of Lincoln, I agree with my Lord Bramstone.

The Sentence of the Court was,

'That Mr. Osbaldston should be fined five thousnd Pounds to the King, and pay five thousand pounds Damages to the Arch-Bishop; be deprived of all Spiritual Dignities and Promotions; imprisioned during the King's Pleasure, and make Submission.

'That the Bishop of Lincoln be fined in five thousand pounds to the King, and three thousand pounds to the Arch-Bishop; to be imprisioned during the King's Pleasure, and to make Submission.

'And Osbaldston was sentenced to stand in the Pillory in the Deans-yard, before his own School, and his Ears to be only nailed to the Pillory.

It so hapned, though the report was that Osbalston was run away, that he was in Court standing in the Croud, he might command his Tipstaff to apprehend him; as soon as the major part of the Court had past Censure upon him, although the Lord Keeper had not then given his Sense; therefore he got out of Court, went to his Study at the School, burnt some Papers, and writ on a Paper, which he left on his Desk, That if the Arch-Bishop inquire after me, tell him, I am gone beyond Canterbury. Whereupon Messengers were sent to the Port-Towns to apprehend him; but he lay hid in a private House in Drury-Lane, till the Parliament met in November 1640.

Carolus Rex.
Right trusty and well-beloved Cousins and Counsellors, We greet you well.

A Copy of the King's Letter to the Nobility, &c.

The late Disorders in Our Realm of Scotland, begun upon pretence of Religion, but have bin raised by factious Spirits, and somented by some few ill, treacherous affected Persons, whose aim hath bin, by troubling the Peace of that Our Kingdom, to work their own particular Ends, and indeed to shake off all Monarchial Government; although We often assure them, that We resolve to maintain constantly their Religion established by the Laws of that kingdom; is now grown to so high and dangerous Consequence, that under their minister Pretences, they have so far reduced many of our People there, that great and considerable forces are raised and assembled in such fort, as We have reason to take into Our Consideration, the Defence and Safety of this Our kingdom of England: And therefore upon due and mature consultation with the Lords of our Privy-Council, We have resolved to repair, in Our Roial Person, to the northern Parts of this Our kingdom, there, by the help of Almighty God, and the assistance of Our loving Subjects, to make Resistance against any Invasion that may happen. And to the end that this with expedition may be effected as We desire, to the glory of God, and the Safety of Us and this our kingdom of England, We have directed, that a considerable Army, both of horse and foot, shall forthwith be levied out of all the Shires of this Our kingdom, to attend Us in this Action; wherein We nothing doubt, but that the Affection, Courage, and fidelity of Our People will appear. We in the mean time have thought fit to give you notice of this Our Resolution, and of the State of these Affairs: And withal hereby do require you to attend Our Roial Person and Standard at Our City of York, the first day of April next ensuing, with such equipage, and such forces, as your Birth, honour, and Interest in the Commonalty doth oblige you to, &c. And We do, and have reason to expect from you a performance hereof; and these Our Letters shall be as sufficient and effectual a Warrant and Discharge unto you, to put your self, and such as shall attend you, into Arms and Order as aforesaid, as if you were authorized thereunto under Our Great Seal of England. And We do hereby require you to certify under your hands, within fifteen Days after the receipt hereof, what Assistance We shall expect from you herein, and to direct the same to one of Our Principal Secretaries of State.

Given under Our Signet, at Our Palace of Westminster, the 15th Day of February, in the 14th Year of Our Reign.

Whilst the King was gone towards the North, the Clergy went on briskly with their Contribution to the War against the Scots, as by a particular Account following will appear.

l. s. d.
The Contribution of the Clergy in the Diocess of Canterbury, as appears by Mr. Will. Cranmer 's Account, An. 1639. amountd to 534 05 03
Of the Dean and Prebends of the Cathed. of Canterbury 300 00 00
Bangor Diocess 192 08 08
Bristol Diocess 714 11 08
Chichester Diocess 985 16 00
Ely Diocess 764 08 00
Glocester Diocess 566 07 05
Hereford Diocess 662 01 03
Lincoln Diocess in Bedford 315 19 06
In the Arch-Deaconry of St. Albans in Hertforshire 72 12 04
In the Arch-Deaconry of Huntington 209 14 06
Norwich Diocess, in the Arch-Deaconry of Norwich and Norfolk 1094 16 08
In the Arch-Deaconry of Suffolk and Sudbury 921 19 09
Winchester Diocess 1305 05 08
Worcester Diocess 624 19 07
The Dean and Chapter of Windsor 200 00 00

What was contributed in other Diocesses, we want a perfect account thereof; but in all these forementioned, every particualr Clergy Man's Contribution is specified by Name; and the Names of those who refused, or were unable to contribute, were specially certified, and returned to the Arch-Bishop.

The Contribution of the Doctors of the Civil Law, at Doctors Commons, as appears by several Notes under Sir John Lamb 's own Hand, found among his Writings, amount to 671l. 13s. 4d. paid in.

How ready such of the Clergy were, as inclined to contribute to this War, will evidently appear by this Letter of Dr. John Packlington, (who wrote Sunday no Sabbath ) to Sir John Lamb.

On Thursday and Friday last, the Clergie met at Bedford, before Mr. Commissary, Mr. Thorne, and my Self. We found them willing to contribute as much as was propounded. The poorest that gave any thing at all, gave no less than 3s. 10 d. in the pound, without deducting of Tenths; the most gave after 4 s. some 5 s. some after 6s. in the pound. Much of the Mony is paid in, and I suppose it will be all in Mr. Commissary's Hands by the 26th of this Month, the day appointed for the paiment. I doubt not but the Clergie of England will teach the Ministers of Scotland Duty and Obedience; and if their Laity will be taught the like by Ours, his Majesty I hope will have a Roial and Joiful Progress into Scotland; which God grant.

At this Meeting, I understand that Dr. Micklethwait is the Man in nomination for Sandy; he is my old Acquaintance, and very good Freind, whom I love with all my heart, for I take him to be a right Man for the Church; and if it might please God that he might be better accommodated nearer his own Means, I think we should mutually rejoice.

No Parsonage of England could fit me better than Sandy; it is of good value, it would draw me out of that Corner, where my stirring for Church-Rights makes me less acceptable with some great Hands.

As the Clergy of the Church of England did liberally contribute to assist his Majesty with a supply of Mony against the Scots, so the Subjects of England, of the Romish Religion, were not wanting to follow that Example; nor the Queen in countenancing the same, as by the Papers following will appear.