Houses of Benedictine monks: The priory of St Neots

A History of the County of Huntingdon: Volume 1. Originally published by Victoria County History, London, 1926.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Houses of Benedictine monks: The priory of St Neots', in A History of the County of Huntingdon: Volume 1, (London, 1926) pp. 385-388. British History Online [accessed 19 April 2024]

In this section


The foundation of the priory of St. Neots is so involved in legend that it is almost impossible to separate what is true in it from what is merely the work of imagination. It may be that there was a monastery founded in this place before the period of Danish invasions in the 9th century; but of this there is no proof beyond the tradition recorded by Thomas of Ely. At any rate, the monastery known by the name of St. Neots Priory cannot be dated earlier than the reign of Edgar, under whose patronage so many religious houses were restored or built. The traditional date, between 972 and 975, would place this priory a little later than the abbey of Ramsey. (fn. 1)

The founders are said to have been a certain earl Alric or Leofric, and his wife. Whether they founded the house in honour of the relics of St. Neot, which had fallen into their hands, as the chronicler declares, by an unexpected piece of good fortune, or whether they built their monastery first, and obtained the relics by some means afterwards, is a matter of little moment. (fn. 2) The foundation was apparently made, like that of Ramsey, with the assistance of St. Oswald of Worcester, and the first monks were sent partly from Thorney and partly from Ely, being made subject to the latter house. (fn. 3)

It is probable that the monastery was destroyed wholly or in part by the Danes in the later invasion of 1010; (fn. 4) but it seems that a few monks lived on there till the Conquest. The manor of Eynesbury, in which St. Neots lay, belonged in 1086 to Roys, wife of Richard, son of Gilbert. (fn. 5) Richard, her husband, it is said, expelled the English monks, and placed the house under the dominion of the Norman abbey of Bec. The first monks of the new foundation were sent by no less a person than St. Anselm himself, who had recently been elected to the chair left vacant by the appointment of Lanfranc to the see of Canterbury. The historian of Ely alleges that the three English monks, unable to accept the new régime, were sent across channel and placed in durance at Bec for the rest of their lives. (fn. 6)

Some few years after the foundation of the new priory doubt was expressed whether the relics treasured in the shrine were really those of St. Neot. St. Anselm had the chest opened in his presence, and expressed his opinion that they were true relics. (fn. 7) It would be interesting to know upon what token his verdict was based; the relics had had almost as chequered a history as those of St. Alban, and their character might well be considered doubtful. (fn. 8)

Roys, wife of Richard, son of Gilbert, in her widowhood endowed the priory with more lands, and persuaded her children to follow her example. Her son Robert chose it for his burial-place; his wife, Maud de Senliz, gave the monks one-third of the manor of Cratefield, Norfolk; William d'Albini, son of Maud by a second marriage, (fn. 9) King Malcolm and King William of Scotland, Henry Earl of Huntingdon, and Alan Dapifer, steward of Countess Roys, were all benefactors in the course of the 12th century. (fn. 10)

Here, as elsewhere, there were suits on the subject of lands and churches in the 12th and 13th centuries. But the value of the priory seems to have decreased rather rapidly from this time, owing to the constant change of superiors. The earliest prior whose name is recorded, Martin, had been a man celebrated for his humility and holiness; so much so that when he was made abbot of Peterborough by Henry I without the consent of the convent, he soon earned the love and respect of his new subjects. (fn. 11) Herbert, prior from 1159 to 1173, seems to have been mindful of the interests of the house under his charge; (fn. 12) but after this there were constant changes, and the tone of the house was lowered, as in most of the alien priories. The abbot across the sea looked upon his English cells as merely a source of revenue; the alien priors knew they might be recalled at any time, and took no interest in the welfare of the house. During the 14th century, through the wars with France, the priory was constantly in the hands of the king's escheators, (fn. 13) and things went from bad to worse. Finally, in 1412, the priory was declared independent of Bec, on the ground that divine service was neglected and revenues diminished by maladministration. An English prior, Edward Salisbury, was placed in charge, under obedience to the diocesan, and the house entered upon a new career. (fn. 14)

There had been early in the 14th century twelve to fifteen monks at St. Neots, (fn. 15) but just before it was declared independent of Bec, all the French monks but two had gone home. (fn. 16) It seems to have begun again with about twelve monks. Bishop Grey visited the house a few years after the denization, but his visitation may not have been very thorough. The injunctions are all formal, and show no bad signs; he ordered seats in the cloister, called carels, to be put up for the convenience of the monks in study, and two bells were to be hung, one in the cloister and one in the refectory. (fn. 17) The condition of the priory at this time could not, however, have been very satisfactory, as in 1439, only a little later, Bishop Alnwick found a good deal that was amiss. The cloister and the church were both in bad repair, so that the rain came in on the choir books; the debts of the house were so serious that the monks were afraid to go out for fear of their creditors; the prior was neglectful of his office, and was accused of having obtained it by unfair means. The night office was not regularly said, and there was some suspicion of unchaste living. (fn. 18)

The results of the visitation are not known, but the report of Bishop Smith in 1506 again implies a low standard. The accounts were not duly stated; deeds were sealed without the consent of the chapter; the brethren were not cheerful in their obedience, and they were not strict about wearing the habit of the order. Reform was ordered on all points, and the prior, having confessed his irregularities to the bishop in the chapter-house, was put to penance. (fn. 19)

The commissioners who visited Ramsey and the neighbourhood in 1535-6 make no mention of St. Neots. They may perhaps have put out some monks professed under the age of twenty-five, according to their instructions; for as many as 11 signed the Acknowledgment of Supremacy, (fn. 20) and only 7 surrendered with the prior in 1539. The value of the house was over £200, so it was not dissolved under the first Act, but lingered on till 21 December 1539, The prior then received a pension of £40, and his companions annuities varying from £7 to £6 6s. 8d. (fn. 21) Five of them were still living in 1554. (fn. 22)

The priory was endowed by Countess Roys with the whole manor of St. Neots, and the manor of Cratefield in Norfolk was given by other members of her family, with parcels of land and churches in the counties of Bedford, Cambridge, Suffolk and Northampton. The churches of St. Neots, Everton and Eynesbury in this county, Tempsford, Turvey, Edworth, Melchbourne in Bedfordshire, Barton Bendish, Beecham Well, Wimbish and Cratefield in Norfolk, Brampton Dingley and Hemington in Northamptonshire, Ubstone in Suffolk, Wing in Rutland, Cottesford in Oxfordshire, Pillerto in Warwickshire, East Boscombe and Cheldreton in Wiltshire, Ayot St. Peter in Hertfordshire, were all at one time in the possession of the priory. (fn. 23) The churches of Melchbourne and Eynesbury were very early lost; (fn. 24) the history of these and the others in relation to St. Neots has been so fully described by Gorham that it is not necessary to give any details here. The valuation of the temporal and spiritual property of the prior at the end of the 13th century was about £227: (fn. 25) in 1535 it was £241 11s. 4½d., including the appropriate rectories of St. Neots, Everton, Hemington, Turvey, Upstone, Cratefield, and the manors of Crendon, Charlton, Barford, and Turvey in Bedfordshire, and Upstone in Suffolk. (fn. 26) The first report of the Crown Bailiff gave a total of £256 15s. 8d. (fn. 27)

Priors of St. Neots

Martin, resigned 1132.
Herbert, occurs 1159 to 1173.
Geoffrey, occurs 1200 to 1204.
William, occurs 1206 to 1210.
Roger, occurs 1218 to 1223.
William, occurs 1224.
Reginald, elected 1226.
Hugh de Fagernum, occurs 1236, resigned 1248.
Henry de Messeville, resigned 1258.
William de Bonesbor, elected 1258.
Elias de Ponte Episcopi, monk of Bec, elected 1262, resigned 1262.
Henry of St. Neots, elected 1264.
Walter de Bernay.
Thomas de Bensend, elected 1275.
John de Bosco Reynoldi, elected 1285, resigned 1292.
John de Secheville, elected 1292, died 1302.
William de Bec, elected 1302.
Geoffrey de Bec, elected 1317.
Clement of St. Stephen, (fn. 28) elected 1322, occurs till 1331.
Peter de Falk, elected 1341.
William de Beaumont, elected 1349.
Geoffrey de Branville, elected 1352.
Peter de Villaribus, elected 1353.
Christian de Troarn, elected 1364, died 1372.
Robert de Glanville, monk of Bec, elected 1372, claimed to be prior 1373, (fn. 29) resigned 1377. (fn. 30)
William of St. Vedast, had custody 1377 to 1399.
Edward Salisbury, elected 1405.
William, occurs 1422.
John Turvey, (fn. 31) resigned before 1439.
John Eton, occurs 1447.
Henry, occurs 1459 to 1461.
William Eynesbury, occurs 1464 to 1486.
Thomas Raundes, resigned 1508.
John Raundes, last prior, elected 1508.

An oval seal (fn. 32) representing the crowned figure of the Virgin delivering a pastoral staff to the abbot, who is about to kneel. Legend:

SIGI . . . . . MARIE . . . . . ABB.TIS

A counter seal of prior Reginald [1226 to c. 1235], on the reverse showing an antique intaglio. Legend:


A pointed oval seal (fn. 33) of the 13th century showing, under a trefoil canopy, the Virgin crowned and seated, with the Child on her left knee and with her right hand delivering a pastoral staff to the kneeling figure of the abbot. The field is diapered with lozenges having a flower in each. Legend:



  • 1. If the first monks came from Thorney, which was founded 972, and Edgar approved the foundation, the date must be between 972 and 975. The passage from Thomas of Ely, Hist. Eliensis, is printed in Gorham's Hist. of St. Neots, p. 270. He says that St. Neot himself founded this monastery, which is most unlikely, and that it was destroyed by the Danes, before the foundation by Leofric. At its foundation three copies of the charter were made, and kept by the bishops of Dorchester and Worcester, and the abbot of Ely.
  • 2. The chronicler, whose work is preserved in Bodl. MSS. 535, and printed in Gorham's Hist. of St. Neots, p. 266, declares that the warden of St. Neot's original shrine in Cornwall carried off the relics and handed them over to Aylric, in obedience to a vision sent by the neglected saint; and that afterwards the king and St. Oswald decided that the Cornishmen had forfeited all rights by their irreverence, and the treasure should remain in Huntingdonshire. This may be a romance; but Gorham's suggestion that the king, the bishop and Aylric had bribed the warden of the shrine to steal the relics, in order to grace the new monastery, has no support from any document.
  • 3. Gorham, op. cit., 270, from Thomas of Ely.
  • 4. Angl. Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), II, 116-7.
  • 5. See Domesday Survey, ante p. 353a.
  • 6. Gorham, op. cit., 271.
  • 7. Linc. Epis. Reg. Memo. Sutton, I22d. At the same time Anselm granted an indulgence to all those who should contribute to the building of the church of the monastery. This gives a date for the rebuilding of the church.
  • 8. There is another tradition that in the second Danish invasion the relics were conveyed to Crowland for safety, and the Crowland monks afterwards asserted that they had kept the true relics, and sent others instead. Gorham, op. cit., 272.
  • 9. The description above of William d'Albini as 'son of Maud de St. Liz by a second marriage' perhaps needs references to justify it. Maud de St. Liz is called the wife of Robert Fitz Richard of Tonbridge in the common genealogies, and also in her charter granting one-third of the manor of Cratefield to St. Neots (Cott. MS. Faustina A iv, fol. 79); and Walter Fitz Robert, her son by this marriage, was a benefactor of St. Neots. The church of Cratefield was, however, given to St. Neots by William d'Albini (Meschines), described ibid. ff. 79 and 43 as 'son of Maud de St. Liz'; which implies a second marriage of Maud with William de Albini Brito, not noticed in the current genealogies, but supported by the Belvoir charters, where William d'Albini Meschines speaks of his mother's name as Maud. Dugdale, Mon. Angl. III, 290.
  • 10. See the documents printed in Gorham, op. cit. from Cott. MS. Faustina A iv. All those of importance have been verified from the originals.
  • 11. Angl. Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), II, 220, 231, 235.
  • 12. His name appears in a great many charters printed by Gorham.
  • 13. Pat. 18 Edw. II, pt. 2, m. 36; 11 Edw. III, pt 2, m. 13; 20 Edw. III, pt. i, m. 21, etc.
  • 14. Pat. 10 Hen. IV, pt. 2, m. 33; Cal. of Pap. Letters, VI, 250. All the documents of denization are printed by Gorham and by Dugdale.
  • 15. Gorham, History of St. Neots, from Inq. a. q. d. 13 Edw. III, no. 59.
  • 16. Cal. of Papal Letters, VI, 250.
  • 17. Linc. Epis. Reg. Memo. Grey, 200.
  • 18. Visitations of Bishop Alnwick, Alnwick Tower, Lincoln.
  • 19. Ibid.
  • 20. L. and P. Henry VIII, vii, 1024(16).
  • 21. Gorham, op. cit., 286.
  • 22. Add MS. 8102.
  • 23. See Gorham, op. cit., where the charters of endowment are quoted at length.
  • 24. Ibid. 72, 74.
  • 25. Ibid. and Pope Nich. Tax. (Rec. Com.)
  • 26. Valor Eccles. (Rec. Com.) IV, 261.
  • 27. Dugdale, Mon. Angl. III, 484.
  • 28. Pat. 15 Edw. II, pt. 2, m. 18; Close R., 5 Edw. III, pt. 1, m. 11d.
  • 29. Linc. Epis. Reg., Buckingham. Memo., 126d.
  • 30. Ibid. 175.
  • 31. Mentioned as having lately resigned in the Alnwick visitation report alluded to above. He is not found at all on Gorham's list; and Clement of St. Stephen is given with only an approximate date. With these two exceptions, it has not been found possible to improve upon Gorham's list of priors, which has been carefully taken from the Lincoln Registers, from clearly dated charters in the Cotton and other manuscripts, and from the archives of Benet College, Cambridge. From John de Secheville (1292) the list has been checked with the Episcopal Registers.
  • 32. B.M. Harl. Ch. 83 A 35.
  • 33. B.M. Seals, lxiv, 83.