Close Rolls, Edward I: March 1282

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward I: Volume 2, 1279-1288. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1902.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward I: March 1282', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward I: Volume 2, 1279-1288, (London, 1902) pp. 180-182. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw1/vol2/pp180-182 [accessed 20 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image

March 1282

March 12.
Down Ampney.
Memorandum, that Nicholas son of Nicholas sold to William Bluet for the aforesaid sum the marriage of Nicholas son of Ralph, his nephew (nepotis), for the use of Emmeline, William's daughter, and he acknowledged that Nicholas son of Ralph will be of full age at St. Nicholas next, and that he will then cause Nicholas son of Ralph to have seisin of the lands that he holds in name of wardship.
John de Bello Campo acknowledges that he owes to William, archbishop of Rages, 20l.; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in co. Essex.
Katherine Paynel puts in her place John de Lulleworth and John Smit in the suit before the king between her and Ralph Wasthose concerning six acres of land in Chelleworthe, concerning which Ralph vouched her to warranty.
Philip de Ludelawe came before the king, on Palm Sunday, and sought to replevy to Richard son of William Milsaunt the latter's land in Lodelawe, which was taken into the king's hands for his default against Matilda, late the wife of William Milsaunt. This is signified to the justices of the Bench.
Luke le Knight came before the king, on Monday after St. Benedict, and sought to replevy to Roger de Nonaunt the latter's land, which was taken into the king's hands for his default against Margery, late the wife of Guy de Nonaunt. This is signified to the justices in eyre in co. Devon.
Walter de la Hoge puts in his place William de Minety in the suit before the king between him and Robert de Kaines, William de Vescy and Isabella, his wife, and Catherine Paynel concerning half a virgate of land in Chelleworth, as to which Walter vouched them to warranty.
Membrane 7dSchedule.
Copy of letter of Edward, the king's eldest son, to Sir John de Verdun, appointing him to pay in Edward's name to Edward's uncle Geoffrey de Lezingnan the 200 marks that John is bound to pay to Edward of the debts of the late Walter de Lacy, at the same terms and place as John ought to pay them to Edward, until the debt be paid in full, unless Edward previously provide Geoffrey in land or rent elsewhere, as he is bound to do by his charter in Geoffrey's hands. John is accordingly ordered to pay the said sum to Geoffrey, the first payment to be made at Michaelmas next. Edward will cause the money thus paid by John to be enrolled and allowed to him as if he had paid it to Edward by Edward's (sic) justiciary and treasurer of Ireland, to whom he has directed letters patent to this effect. Dated at Lamheth, 10 March, in the 42nd year of the reign of Edward's father.
Copy of letter of Geoffrey de Lezignan, brother of the king of England, to Sir John de Verdun, ordering him to pay to the bearer of the presents the 100 marks due, in accordance with the preceding letter, to Geoffrey at Michaelmas at the exchequer of Dublin. Dated at the Ascension, 42 Henry son of John.
Memorandum, that on Monday after St. Valentine, 10 Edward, Theobald de Verdun came into chancery at Shireburn, and showed the aforseaid writings, not abolished, cancelled, or vitiated in any part, and sealed with Sir Edward's seal and another with the seal of Sir Geoffrey.
Membrane 6d.
Memorandum, that Ralph de Curry came before the king, on Wednesday the feast of the Annunciation, and sought to replevy to Peter de Grenham and Eleanor, his wife, their land in Weburneford, which was taken into the king's hands for their default against the king.
Andrew de Haucot came before the king, on Saturday the eve of Easter, and sought to replevy his land in Westsheford, which was taken into the king's hands for his default in the king's court against Henry de la Wyk and Agnes, his wife. This is signified to the justices of the Bench.
Petronilla, wife of John de la Mare, puts in her place Hugh le Dol and Nicholas de Stok in the suit before the king between John de la Mare and her and the king concerning the hundred of Hegthridebir[y].
March 28.
Down Ampney.
Adam son of William de Huche, who is going to parts beyond sea by the king's licence, attorned before the king Robert Noreys of St. Neots in all pleas. The king granted, at Adam's instance, that Robert might make attorneys in Adam's place for three years, unless Adam return.
Enrolment of release by Adam, son and heir of William de Hyche, to Thomas de Ippegrave and Alice, his wife, of his right in the lands formerly held by William, his father, in Grimmeshey in le Broun, which William bought from Gilbert son of Walter. For this release Thomas paid him fifteen marks. Witnesses: Hugh de Sancto Edwardo, Thomas de Bernak, Hugh Gerard, Humphrey Beneit, Geoffrey de Hokes of Kemston, Abel juxta Aquam, William Bascod, bailiff of Bedford, Robert de Stiventon, John Brodeye, John Cullebere, Thomas Halidey.
Memorandum, that Adam came into chancery and acknowledged the premises.
Robert Kemel puts in his place Richard atte Bure and William Harald in the suit before the king between Geoffrey Gacelyn and Robert concerning a trespass committed upon Geoffrey.
John de la Mare, who is going to Wales by the king's orders, attorns before the king Adam le Gust and Nicholas de Stok in all pleas in England. The king, at John's instance, granted that they may make attorneys in John's place until the quinzaine of Midsummer next.
Matilda de Clare, countess of Gloucester and Hertford, puts in her place Robert de Pratis and Griffin son of Alice in the suit before the king between [her and] Walter Milburg, William le Bonde of Toniton and the prior of Derhurst concerning certain trespasses committed upon them by her.
Henry Andreu puts in his place Richard de la Bure in the suit before the king between Geoffrey Gacelin and Joan his wife and Henry concerning a trespass committed upon Geoffrey and Joan.