Close Rolls, Edward II: March 1311

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward II: Volume 1, 1307-1313. Originally published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1892.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward II: March 1311', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward II: Volume 1, 1307-1313, (London, 1892) pp. 343-345. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw2/vol1/pp343-345 [accessed 23 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image

March 1311

March 3.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
To the abbot and convent of Burton-on-Trent. Order to admit Thomas de Bannebury, knight, the bearer of these presents, into their house without delay, and to administer to him the necessaries of life, according to the king's former orders, as the king considers their excuses for not obeying his former orders are frivolous, untruthful, and inacceptable.
March 5.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
To Henry de Gildeford, king's clerk. Order to deliver immediately by indenture the king's seal appointed for the custody of the liberty of the bishopric of Durham when in the late king's hands, which seal he ought to have delivered into the exchequer immediately upon the restitution of the liberty to Anthony, late bishop of Durham, to the king's clerk Adam de Brom, to whom the king has committed the seal for the exercise of the office of chancellor in the bishopric upon the present voidance.
Membrane 11d.
Memorandum, that whereas lately in the parliament of Staunford it was agreed between the envoys of W. count of Hainault, Holland, and Zeeland, having special powers in this behalf, and Walter le Keu, of Lincoln, for himself and other merchants of England, seeking for restitution to be made to him and his fellows for their goods to a great sum taken by the men of Holland and Zeeland, that the envoys should find the said Walter and his fellows security to their content for the said sum of money, as is contained in the rolls of chancery, and the count bound himself for payment of that sum at certain terms to Robert Elys, of Great Yarmouth, so that the said Robert should find the merchants security for that sum on behalf of the count and his men of Holland and Zeeland; the said Robert, on Thursday the morrow of Ash Wednesday (Cinerum), in the fourth year of the king's reign, appeared in chancery, and granted and acknowledged that he would come into chancery in the quinzaine of Easter next, and make the security to the said merchants that he was bound to make for the remainder of the sum due to them; and this he promised to do under grievous penalty to be paid to the king.
Jan. 30.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
To B. archbishop of Rouen. Order to grant to William de Loriaco, chaplain and almoner of the queen, the pension to be received from his treasury (camera) that he is bound, by reason of his new creation, to grant to one of the king's clerks until he shall be provided by the archbishop with a benefice; the king have nominated the said William; whereupon the archbishop wrote that this custom was unknown to him, adding that he would, out of the special affection that he had conceived for the king of old time, provide the said William with a fitting benefice when he had the means of doing so: as the custom cannot be doubted, the king now makes the above order. By p.s. [1692.]
John Abel acknowledges that he owes to Master Walter de Thorp, canon of St. Paul's London, 100 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in cos. Kent and Essex.
March 8.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
John de Kyngesbury came before the king, on Sunday the feast of SS. Perpetua and Felicitas, and sought to replevy to Geoffrey de Pulpenne the said Geoffrey's land in Yatesbury, taken into the king's hands for his default before the justices of the Bench against Adam son of Adam le Nyweman, of Wynterburn Monkton (Monachorum).
March 14.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
The said John came before the king, on Sunday after the feast of St. Gregory last, and sought to replevy the land of the said Geoffrey as above.
March 20.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
John de Halyburn came before the king, on Saturday the feast of St. Cuthbert the Bishop, and sought to replevy his land in Falleye, taken into the king's hands for his default before the justices of the Bench against Alice, late the wife of Robert de Teye. This is signified to the justices.
March 20.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
To the sheriff of Leicester. Order to proclaim in Leicester and elsewhere in his bailiwick that no earl, baron, knight, or other shall tourney, joust, or go armed at Leicester or elsewhere in the realm whilst the king is in Scotland, as the king understands that certain men are about to assemble at Leicester to bourd. [Fœdera.] By p.s.
Feb. 24.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
William de Brokholes, who long served the king, is sent to the abbot and convent of Hailes to receive for life the necessaries of life in food and clothing, according to the requirements of his estate, in place of Thomas Scot, deceased, who had the like at the request of the late king.
By p.s. [1736.]
Hugh de la Chaumbre, who long served the king, is sent to the prior and convent of St. Katherine's without Lincoln, to receive for life the necessaries of life in food, clothing, etc., in place of Matthew le Ussher, who had the like at the request of the late king, etc., as above. By p.s.
March 28.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
John de Kyngesbury came before the king, on Sunday after the feast of the Annunciation, and sought to replevy to Geoffrey de Pupelpenne the said Geoffrey's land in Yatesbury, taken into the king's hands for his default before the justices of the Bench against Adam, son of Adam le Nyweman, of Winterburn Monkton.
March 29.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
Master John de Claxton, rector of the church of Little Colingburn, diocese of Salisbury, who is specially engaged by the king's order in his service, has letters to the bishop of Salisbury not to compel him to make personal residence in his benefice.
March 19.
Berwick-on-Tweed.
To the sheriff of Durham. Order to summon the archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, earls, barons, knights, and all free tenants of his county, and four men and the reeve from every town, and twelve burgesses of every borough, and all those who ought to appear before the justices in eyre, to be at Durham on Monday after the Ascension next to come before Hervey de Staunton, William de Ormesby, and others whom the king is sending thither, to hear and do the king's order. He is also to cause to come before them all pleas of the crown that are not pleaded, or that have arisen since the last eyre, and all pleas and attachments concerning the same, and all assizes and other pleas respited to the first assize there, with the writs of these assizes and pleas. He is also to proclaim that all assizes and pleas attermined and not finished, or summoned before any justice in the liberty of Durham, shall be before the above-named in the same state in which they remained. He is also to summon all those who were sheriffs since the last eyre to answer for their time of office. He is also to proclaim in all cities and boroughs and market towns, that all those who claim to have liberties shall appear to show what liberties they claim to have, and by what right. He is to be there himself with his bailiffs and ministers to certify the justices of all things concerning the eyre. He is to proclaim that all wishing to complain of the bailiffs and ministers of the said liberty or of others shall appear before the justices to make their complaints and to receive amends for the same. By p.s. [1790.]
The like to the sheriff of Sadberg, to make like summons to be at Sadberg on the morrow of the Holy Trinity.
The like to the said sheriffs, to make such summons for the said places and days, with the addition in the last clause "of the writs thereupon directed "according to law, etc., and of the liberty aforesaid, and according to the ordinance, etc."
To Adam de Brom, chancellor of the bishopric of Durham, void and in the king's hands. Order to inspect the transcripts enclosed with these presents of the king's writs to the sheriffs of Durham and Sadbergh to summon the eyre as above, and to consider whether such eyres in that county ought to be summoned by writs under the king's seal or under the seal appointed for the custody of the said bishopric, in the keeping of the said Adam, doing herein what shall be best concerning the said summonses, either by the king's writs or by other writs under the said seal, according to the law and custom of the aforesaid liberty.