Close Rolls, Edward III: November 1361

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 11, 1360-1364. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1909.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward III: November 1361', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 11, 1360-1364, (London, 1909) pp. 215-220. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw3/vol11/pp215-220 [accessed 19 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

November 1361

Nov. 20.
Westminster.
Order to the sheriff of Lancaster to cause a coroner to be elected instead of Richard de Huyton, who is dead.
Nov. 18.
Westminster.
To William de Otteford escheator in Cambridgeshire. Order to remove the king's hand and not to intermeddle further with the manors of Neuton and Tyd, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as on the finding of an inquisition, taken by the escheator, that John de Colleville knight at his death held the said manors in his demesne as of fee of the king as of the bishopric of Ely which was in the king's hand, namely the manor of Neuton by socage and the manor of Tyd by knight service, and that John his son is his next heir, and at his father's death was within age, and after at the suit of John the son, alleging that he was of full age, namely 23 years, and praying that the king would order the lands of his father so taken into the king's hand to be delivered to him, the king appointed Gilbert Bernard, William le Moigne knight and John de Graunset and two of them to make inquisition; and by inquisition, by Gilbert and John so made, it is found that John de Colleville the father held no lands in that county of the king as of the bishopric of Ely or otherwise nor of any other, for that long before his death, namely half a year, in good faith without collusion he enfeoffed Edmund Noen, Ralph Bigeneye, Thomas de Welle, Peter Horseye and Nicholas Massyngham and their heirs of the manors of Neuton, Tyd and March held of the said bishopric, and they held the same at his death, and that John his son is his heir, and at his father's death was of the age of 23 and upwards.
Nov. 20.
Westminster.
To the sheriff of Kent for the time being. Order, upon the petition of Edward prince of Wales, who has taken to wife Joan sister and heir of John earl of Kent, to pay them 30l. every year of the issues of that county at Easter and Michaelmas, in the same manner as that sum was paid in his life time to Edmund earl of Kent the king's uncle, taking their acquittances to witness every payment; as on 26 February in the 1st year of the reign, among other lands etc., the king by letters patent gave that yearly sum to the said Edmund under the name and honour of earl of Kent, to him and the heirs of his body, and as well the said earl at his death as the said John after earl of Kent his son and heir at his death was seised of that rent in his demesne as of fee, as is found as well by divers inquisitions in chancery returned as by certificate of the exchequer sent thither.
Et erat patens.
Nov. 23.
Westminster.
To Reynold de Sholdham inspector of the king's forfeitures in the port of London and the river Thames. Order to cause a ship of Matthew Cleysson of Flanders called 'Godeschild' of Lescluse, with any indenture thereof made, to be delivered to the said Matthew to make his advantage thereof, for the king's will is that Matthew and John de Hatfeld, Roger Rotour, Thomas Pykenham, Nicholas Hotoft and Robert de Hull citizens of London, his mainpernors, be discharged of the ship and the price thereof, although the king lately ordered the inspector to cause the said ship to be appraised, in the presence of the collectors of customs in that port and of John Cory controller thereof, by the oath of merchants and other true men, and by indenture containing the price thereof, to be between the inspector, Matthew and the mainpernors made, to deliver the same to Matthew by a mainprise, for that they mainperned to answer to the king for the said ship, which was by the inspector arrested as forfeit in the said port for that 100 weys of cheese were put therein after that the ship was laded and the goods therein cocketed, and also for that Matthew broke his arrest; as oath has now been made before the king in chancery that the said cheese was of merchants of England and not of foreign merchants, whereby it ought not to be customed, nor the ship to be confiscated, and Matthew has made fine with the king by 20s. for breach of the arrest. By C.
Nov. 4.
Westminster.
To the treasurer and the barons of the exchequer. Order to search the rolls and memoranda of the exchequer and if, by inspection thereof, inquisition or otherwise, they be assured that the men and tenants of the town of Dodyngton within the bounds of the king's forest of Rokyngham have not, nor ought to assart or arrent a piece of ground within that forest called Dodyngton Short, and have not hitherto paid 25s. yearly for that cause nor ought to be therewith charged, to stay altogether their demand upon the said men by summons of the exchequer for payment of that sum, causing them to be thereof discharged; upon their petition, shewing that though they have not at any time caused the said piece of ground to be assarted or arrented, nor is it yet assarted, nor can be assarted by them for that other tenants of the town of Clive and other neighbouring towns have common of pasture therein, the treasurer and barons pretending that they have so done and have arrented to the king in 25s., which they have not, are unlawfully distraining them for payment of that sum every year.
Oct. 20.
Westminster.
To the collectors of the petty custom in the port of London for the time being. Order to pay to Nicholas George 12d. daily according to the king's letters patent, taking his acquittance; as on 5 October in the 33rd year of the reign the king of his favour granted him by letters patent for good service 12d. a day for life to be taken at the exchequer at Easter and Michaelmas by even portions, and after at the request of Nicholas, and for that he gave back those letters to be cancelled in chancery, the king granted him the same sum to be taken of the said petty custom for his life or until the king should take other order for his estate. By p.s. [25530.]
Et erat patens.
Oct. 29.
Westminster.
To John Estbury escheator in the county of Suthampton. Order not to intermeddle further with a messuage and garden, 60 acres of land and 4 acres of meadow in Basyngstokes taken into the king's hand by the death of Thomas de Wrottyng, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as the king has learned by inquisition, taken by the escheator, that Thomas at his death held no lands in that county in chief in his demesne as of fee, but held the premises of another than the king.
Membrane 12.
Oct. 29.
Westminster.
To John de Estbury escheator in the county of Suthampton. (The last order repeated.)
Nov. 3.
Westminster.
To David Baxster. Writ de intendendo in regard to lands by him held of John de Coupland as of the lands which were of Roger de Holthale; as on 6 July in the 33rd year of the reign the king by letters patent gave to the said John 5 messuages and 2 carucates of land in Holthale which were of Roger, and were taken into the king's hand by William de Nessefeld escheator in Northumberland for that Roger adhered to the Scots, enemies of King Edward II, to hold to John and his heirs with the services of free men and neifs and all other appurtenances.
Et erat patens.
Nov. 4.
Westminster.
To William de Otteford escheator in Cambridgeshire. Order to remove the king's hand and not to intermeddle further with 3 acres of land and 3 acres of meadow in Shod Caumpes, delivering to the prior of Hatfeld Regis any issues thereof taken; as King Edward II by letters patent granted his licence to Robert Taper to give and assign to the prior and convent of Hatfeld Regis and to their successors 3 acres of land and 5 acres of meadow in Caumpes Comitis and Shod Caumpes in aid of the maintenance of a chantry therein, and likewise to the said prior and convent to receive and hold the same, and the escheator lately took the premises into the king's hand, whereby the king ordered him to certify in chancery the cause wherefore he so took the lands of the said prior in Shod Caumpes, and he certified that he so took 3 acres of land and 3 acres of meadow in Shod Caumpes for that it was found, by inquisition before him taken, that in the time of King Edward I without the king's licence the prior appropriated the same to himself and his house of lands held in chief by knight service; and after, at the suit of the prior, alleging that the land and meadow so taken are of the lands by him acquired by licence of Edward II, and held of the earl of Oxford and not immediately of the king, and praying that the king would order his hand to be removed, the king ordered the escheator to make inquisition thereupon; and by inquisition so made it is found that 3 acres of land and 3 acres of the 5 acres of meadow are the land and meadow acquired by licence of Edward II, and are held not of the king but of the earl of Oxford.
Nov. 9.
Westminster.
To John de Estbury escheator in the county of Suthampton. Order to deliver to Bernard Brocas and Mary his wife a messuage, two carucates of land, 60 acres of wood and 45s. 2d. of rent in Styvyngton taken into the king's hand by the death of Joan who was wife of John de Roches, and not to intermeddle further with other lands likewise so taken which are held of others than the king, delivering up any issues taken of the lands held of others; as the king has learned by inquisition, taken by the escheator, that Joan at her death held no lands in that county in chief nor of others in her demesne as of fee, but held the premises for life as jointly enfeoffed with her said husband in chief by fealty and suit at the hundred of Basyngstok, and divers other lands in that county of others than the king, by fine thereof levied in the king's court with his licence, with remainder to John de Bourhunte deceased and the said Mary then his wife and to the heirs of their bodies, and the king has taken the fealty of Bernard.
Nov. 21.
Westminster.
To John de Estbury escheator in Wilts. Order not to intermeddle further with the manor of Worsseton and a messuage and two carucates of land in Monketon taken into the king's hand by the death of Gilbert de Berewyk, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as the king has learned by inquisition, taken by the escheator, that Gilbert at his death held no lands in that county in chief in his demesne as of fee, but held the premises of others than the king.
Nov. 10.
Westminster.
To John de Estbury escheator in Wilts. Order not to intermeddle further with the manor of Estwyk and two thirds of a messuage and of two carucates of land in Shaldebourne and Harden, held for life by Robert de Bilkemore knight deceased of the heritage of John son and heir of John Lilleboun, and taken into the king's hand by the death of Robert, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as it is found by inquisition, taken by the escheator, that Robert at his death held no lands in that county in chief nor of others in his demesne as of fee, but held the premises as aforesaid of the said heir, late in the wardship of John de Malewayn deceased by demise of Queen Philippa, who by the king's grant had that wardship until the lawful age of the heir with his marriage and the reversions to him belonging; and on 20 May in the 33rd year of his reign the king by letters patent granted to the said queen until the lawful age of his heir the wardship of the lands which were of John Lilleboun, with the reversions of lands of that heritage held in dower, by the courtesy of England or otherwise for life or a term of years, and all else to that wardship belonging.
Nov. 9.
Westminster.
To John de Bekynton escheator in Dorset. Order not to intermeddle further with the manor of Bromleye taken into the king's hand by the death of Joan who was wife of John de Roches, delivering up any issues thereof taken; as the king has learned by inquisition, taken by the escheator, that Joan at her death held no lands in that county in chief nor of any other in her demesne as of fee, but held the said manor of the heritage of Mary daughter and heir of the said John for her life in dower by assignment of her said husband of another than the king.
Membrane 11.
Oct. 6.
Westminster.
To Philip de Lutteleye escheator in Herefordshire. Order to deliver to John de Crophull knight and Margery his wife, one of the daughters and heirs of Theobald de Verdon, tenant in chief of the late king, three and a half knights' fees in Hopton, Stretton, Latton by Kyngeslane and Lydecote, then held by Richard de Hopton, of the fees which Elizabeth de Burgo, late wife of the said Theobald, held in dower by the king's assignment of the purparty of Margery, and which were taken into the king's hand by the death of Elizabeth; as the king has at another time commanded that all lands of that heritage and purparty so held in dower and taken into his hand should be delivered to John and Margery.
To William de Otteford escheator in Cambridgeshire. Order to [remove] the king's hand from a messuage of the abbot of Croyland in Rokyngton . . . . . . [entry incomplete]; as the king lately ordered the escheator to certify in chancery the cause wherefore the same was by him taken into the king's hand, and he signified that he so took the premises for that it was found by inquisition, before him taken of his office, that the said abbot appropriated the same to himself and his house without the king's licence; and after the abbot informed the king that he did not acquire nor appropriate the premises as aforesaid, but caused the same to be seized into his hand as an escheat in right of his church, for that Hugh Agas, who held the premises to him and his heirs of the abbot by fealty and the service of 12d. a year, died without an heir, and prayed the king to cause his hand to be removed, wherefore the king ordered the escheator to make inquisition thereupon; and by inquisition so made it is found that Hugh held the premises of the abbot by the service aforesaid and by suit at his court, that he died without an heir, and that the abbot seized the same as an escheat as aforesaid, without that that he acquired the same of the said Hugh.
Nov. 18.
Westminster.
To William de Otteford escheator in Cambridgeshire. Order to remove the king's hand and not to intermeddle further with a rent of the abbot of Lesnes in Clopton and Gamylygaye, delivering to the abbot any issues thereof taken; as the king lately ordered the escheator to certify in chancery the cause wherefore that rent was by him taken into the king's hand, and he certified that he so took the same for that it was found, by inquisition before him, that the said abbot without the king's licence appropriated to him and his house 50s. of yearly rent in Clopton and 20s. of yearly rent in Gamylygaye after the statute of mortmain; and after, at the suit of the abbot, alleging that his predecessors were seised of that rent before the said statute, namely time out of mind, and peaceably continued their seisin in all times past until the same was so taken, without that that he or any of his predecessors acquired the same or any parcel thereof after the statute, and praying the king to order his hand to be removed, the king ordered the escheator to make inquisition thereupon; and by inquisition so taken it is found that the said men of religion long before the said statute held in Clopton the fourth part of one knight's fee by the feoffment of Robert de Rokella, of which fourth part long before the statute they enfeoffed Simon Rusoun for a rent of 50s. to them yearly payable, that William Avenell long ago confirmed to them all the land in Gameleye which William Avenell his uncle formerly gave them by charter, that they afterwards demised and granted that land to divers tenants for a rent of 20s. a year, which confirmation and demise were made long before the said statute, that they were seised of those rents from that time and have taken them until now, and that the said lands are held in almoin.
Nov. 17.
Westminster.
To the treasurer and the barons of the exchequer. Order to stay their demand by summons of the exchequer against John Laundels for payment of a farm of 20l. from 4 June last, and to discharge him thereof, releasing any distraint made for that cause; as on 30 June in the 34th year of the reign the king of his favour pardoned Egidia who was wife of John de Molyns the suit of his peace to him pertaining for manslaughters, robberies, larcenies, felonies and trespasses whatsoever by her committed within the realm, and further gave her all her lands, goods and chattels which might be called forfeit by reason thereof, as in the letters patent is contained; and after at the suit of Egidia, alleging that William de Golafre, by a fine levied before the justices of the Bench, held for life two thirds of two thirds of the manor of Bampton co. Oxford with reversion to John de Molyns and Egidia, and that the same were after William's death taken into the king's hand among other lands of John for that he was as a clerk convicted before the king of divers felonies and died in prison, and praying that the king would order them to be restored to her, the king ordered John de Estbury escheator in that county to make inquisition thereupon; and by inquisition so made it is found that William held two thirds of two thirds of the said manor as aforesaid by fine levied at Westminster on the morrow of the Ascension in the 27th year of the reign, with reversion to John and Egidia and to the heirs of John, that by the decease of William in the life time of John de Molyns the same were taken into the king's hand among other lands of John by reason of felonies of which John as a clerk was convicted, that John and Egidia granted the same (which are in the king's hand for the cause aforesaid and for no other) to no man, nor changed their estate therein, that the premises are held of another than the king and are worth 19l. 12s. 8d. a year in all issues, and that John de Molyns died on 10 March in the 34th year; and on 4 June last the king ordered John Laundels, to whom he committed the keeping of the premises for 20l. to be yearly rendered to the king, to cause the same to be restored to Egidia with the issues thereof taken since her husband's death. Proviso that answer be made to the king for the said farm for the time that the premises were in his hand during the life time of John de Molyns.