Close Rolls, Edward III: March 1368

Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 12, 1364-1369. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1910.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Edward III: March 1368', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III: Volume 12, 1364-1369, (London, 1910) pp. 468-470. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/edw3/vol12/pp468-470 [accessed 13 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image

March 1368

March 10.
Westminster.
To the sheriffs of London. Order, upon the petition of William Fabel, to stay the exigents against the said William and the taking of his body by the mainprise of William Grys of Essex and Clement de Lenne of London 'draper,' bringing this writ before the justices of the Bench on the day the writ de judicio is returnable; as his petition shews that Robert Marny knight is impleading him before the said justices for a debt of 4l. 19s., that by writ de judicio he was put in exigents in the husting of London for that he came not before them to answer the said Robert, and that he is ready so to answer and to stand to right in all things; and the said William Grys and Clement have mainperned in chancery under a pain of 20l. to have him before the said justices on the day aforesaid.
April 3.
Westminster.
To the sheriff of Wiltes. Order, upon the petition of Ralph Colles and Nicholas Abbot, to stay the exigents against them and the taking of their bodies by the mainprise of Richard Wolhampton and William North of the said county, bringing this writ before the justices of the Bench on the day the writ of exigents is returnable; as their petition shews that William Beneyt is impleading them before the said justices for an alleged trespass, and that though they are ready to answer him and to stand to right in all things, they are put in exigents to be outlawed for that the sheriff of malice returned before the said justices that they were not found in his bailiwick nor had aught therein, and for that they came not before the said justices to answer, praying for remedy; and they have found in chancery the said Richard and William North, who have mainperned body for body to have them before the said justices on the day aforesaid.
To the same. Like order, mutatis mutandis, upon the petition of Ralph Colles and Thomas Brewe, who are impleaded by John Duyn for an alleged trespass, and have found the same mainpernors.
Membrane 21d.
Indenture made between John Devenyssh skinner and 'Ede' Purchas of London draper of the one part and Walter de Clopton, Nicholas Bledewyne and Richard Brice of the other part, being a grant to the said Walter, Nicholas and Richard that they shall take and have all the profits of the lands and rents of Sir Eustace Dabrichecourt knight in Devonshire, 'Hamptesshire,' Somerset and Gloucestershire as fully as the said John and 'Ede' have execution thereof by virtue of a statute merchant of the staple whereby Sir Eustace is bound to them in 316l. 4s., rendering to the said John and 'Ede' within two years in the said John's house in the parish of Allhallows in the Roperle London the sums following, to wit one moiety of the said sum the first year at Whitsuntide and All Saints by even portions, and the other moiety thereof the second year at the same feasts by even portions; and in respect of damages for withholding the said sum beyond the day of payment and their costs at divers times in divers counties incurred or yet to be incurred in the business, the parties to the said statute shall be at the award of the bishop of Winchester the chancellor [and] of the earl of Arundell in case they will arbitrate, or of Sir Robert de Thorp and Sir Thomas de Lodelowe if they will arbitrate, or of Walter de Clopton and Walter de Perle within two years from this date, and in case they will not the said parties will go to law, the said John and 'Ede' reserving power to them and their executors again to enter and hold the said lands and rents until recompense be made them for any default. Be it remembered that the said John and 'Ede' then had no profit thereof, nor seisin or execution, save seven days before this date. Dated London, 24 March 42 Edward III. French.
Memorandum of acknowledgment by the said John and 'Ede,' Walter and Nicholas, in the chancery at London, 25 March.
Charter of Walter fitz Wauter lord of Wodeham, giving with warranty to Thomas bishop of Norwich, Master William de Blyth archdeacon of Norffolk, Robert Kelby parson of Hemmyngesby, John de Wyllyngham parson of Great Teye and John de Kyngesfold, their heirs and assigns, his manors of Lexden, Cage and Carykesheth co. Essex, his inn and rent in London, all his purparty of the manors of Thrustonton co. Suffolk, Multon and Flete which was of Thomas fitz Wauter his uncle, and of the manors of Beausolas and Skyrbek co. Lincoln. Witnesses: Edmund de Thorp, Richard de Schelton, Robert de Ilketelishale knights, Stephen Payoun, Thomas Goodwyne, Richard de Upston, Simon Warenner, John Brysyngham, Robert Bolour, Richard Whyte. Dated Hemenhale, 1 March 42 Edward III.
Memorandum of acknowledgment in the chancery at the priory of St. Mary Suthwerk, 17 March.
March 15.
Westminster.
To the sheriff of Bukingham. Order to stay the publication of the exigents against John Middelton and the taking of his body by the mainprise of Roger Dore, Walter Leycestre, John Rouland and William Bettenham of Middlesex, bringing this writ before the king on the day the writ of exigents is returnable; as the king has learned that John Chilterne, the said John Middelton, William Latre and William Barham are put in exigents in Bukinghamshire to be outlawed for that they came not before the king concerning their ransom for not having John de Miriden and Margery his wife before the king in his court at the day appointed as they mainperned to do; and now the said John de Middelton has prayed the king to stay the publication as aforesaid, inasmuch as he is ready to content the king for his ransom in that behalf and to stand to right in all things; and the said Roger, Walter, John Rouland and William Bettenham, appearing in person in chancery, have mainperned under a pain of 10 marks to have him before the king at the day above mentioned.
William de Barham, put in exigents in Bukinghamshire for the same cause, has the like writ by mainprise of William Larke and Thomas Merhyth under a pain of 10 marks.
March 24.
Westminster.
To the mayor and sheriffs of London. Order to cause proclamation to be made in the city and suburbs of London, that all merchants, vintners and others cause their wines for sale to be forthwith gauged under pain of forfeiture thereof, making diligent search touching the matter, causing all wines found exposed for sale and not gauged after the proclamation to be taken as forfeit into the king's hand according to the statutes, causing to be taken and imprisoned until further order all those who shall make debate or resistance and will not suffer their wines for sale to be gauged, and certifying under seal in chancery from time to time the wines so arrested, the price, description and owners thereof; as in the statute published at Westminster in the 27th year of the reign it is contained (inter alia) that all red wines and white brought for sale to the realm of England or the lands of Ireland and Wales shall be well and truly gauged by the king's gauger or his deputy, so that if any man shall make hindrance or debate hereupon, not willing to suffer his wines to be gauged, he shall forfeit the same, be punished by imprisonment, and be ransomed at the king's will, and if the tun or pipe of wine for sale shall contain less than it ought according to the assize, the price of so much as shall so be lacking shall be allowed and subtracted in the payment thereof according to the price of such tun or pipe; and in another statute published in the 31st year it is contained that if any man shall sell to any a tun or pipe of wine not gauged, the seller shall forfeit that wine to the king or the value thereof; and now the king is informed that certain merchants, as well vintners of the city of London as others, seeking excessive and unlawful gain, are causing great number of tuns and pipes of wine not gauged to be lodged without the knowledge of the king's gauger, and have long been selling and do daily sell the same to nobles and others as if they contained a right prise, though they do not but greatly lack, taking for them the full price, in contempt of the king, to the hurt and deceit of the people, the loss and prejudice of the gauger, and contrary to the statutes.
[Fœdera.]