Close Rolls, Henry VI: July 1427

Calendar of Close Rolls, Henry VI: Volume 1, 1422-1429. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1933.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Close Rolls, Henry VI: July 1427', in Calendar of Close Rolls, Henry VI: Volume 1, 1422-1429, (London, 1933) pp. 283-285. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-close-rolls/hen6/vol1/pp283-285 [accessed 23 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image

July 1427

July 21.
Westminster.
To the treasurer and the barons of the exchequer. Order not to trouble John de Holand (Holond) now earl of Huntyngdoun for his homages; as by petition presented in parliament in 4 Henry V the said John, being son of John de Holande late earl of Huntyngdoun, shewing that that earl and Elizabeth his wife had issue Richard the elder son, now deceased without issue, and the said John the younger, that all the castles, honours, manors, lands, rents, services, reversions, offices, knights' fees, wards, marriages, reliefs, escheats, advowsons, chaces, parks, warrens, fisheries, fairs, markets, liberties, customs, mills, ferries, woods, moors, marshes, fee farms, hundreds, wapentakes, views of frankpledge, wrecks of the sea, profits, issues, revenues etc. which the earl had on 5 January the eve of the Epiphany 1 Henry IV, and which then or after were seized into that king's hand by reason of his forfeiture and by virtue of a judgment rendered in a parliament holden at Westminster at the octaves of St. Hilary 2 Henry IV, were by King Richard II or by some former king or other person given in tail to the said earl and Elizabeth or one of them or to one of the earl's ancestors, prayed the late king in parliament by authority of parliament to grant that he should be enabled and restored to the name of earl of Huntyngdoun, and to the honour and dignity of his father without corruption of blood, so as to be son and heir of line to his father and brother and heir to the said Richard in respect of the castles etc. aforesaid, and able to be heir to them and any ancestor whatsoever as fully as if there had been no forfeiture and no judgment rendered, that he might enter and take seisin thereof, except all the castles etc. by the said Elizabeth held of the duchy of Cornwall for her life, and except the castle and manor of Manerbier and Pennaly co. Pembroke, the manor of Ardyngton and 'Filbertescourt' co. Berkshire, the manors of Berforde co. Wiltesir and Flete Amarle co. Devon by her held in jointure as she avers, when the petitioner should come of age, namely 29 March next after that parliament as did appear by an office taken by virtue of a writ of diem clausit extremum before Robert Cary then escheator in Devon, without proof of age or other process or suit at law whatsoever, notwithstanding the seizure thereof into the hands of King Henry IV or the late king by reason of the said forfeiture and judgment, the corruption of his blood, or any grant or gift by those kings made, provided always that the said Elizabeth should have her dower of the same, and that the petitioner should not thereby or by aught therein contained be thereafter debarred from any action, suit or benefit he might then or after have by the common law; and the late king did grant that by authority of parliament he should be so enabled, and as to the entailed lands etc. mentioned that at the discretion of the chancellor he should on 29 March aforesaid have a writ of livery of all those which he might prove of record or by other evidences were entailed, were then in the hands of the late king or his farmers, and of which the late king was seised at his death, with the exceptions aforesaid, and in respect of other entailed lands in the hands of others writs of scire facias against the tenants thereof to shew cause wherefore he should not have livery of the same, saving always the forfeiture of lands by his father held in fee simple, and saving to the late king and his heirs all which then or formerly were parcel of the duchy of Cornwall or to that duchy annexed; and upon the finding of divers inquisitions, taken before John Fortescu the late king's escheator in Devon, that King Richard was seised of the manors of Bovytracy, 'Northlieu,' Holdesworthy, Langacre, Barnestaple, Combemartyn, Fremyngton, 'Southmolton,' Dertyngton, Blakeboruboty and Wynkele, and the hundreds of Fremyngton and 'Southmolton,' with the knights' fees, advowsons, chaces, parks, fairs, markets, liberties, services of freeholders and neifs and all other profits etc. thereto belonging, and by divers letters patent gave the same to John de Holand late earl of Huntyngdoun and to the heirs of his body by Elizabeth then his wife, that by the form of those gifts the earl was thereof seised in fee tail, and died so seised, that after his death the same descended to Richard de Holande as his son and heir by Elizabeth, and after the death of Richard to John de Holand, now earl of Huntyngdoun, being his brother and heir by the said Elizabeth, for that Richard died without issue, and came to the hands of King Henry IV by the death of the earl and by reason of the nonage of the said Richard, and were in the late king's hand by reason of the said John's nonage, and that the manors of Bovytracy, 'Northlieu,' Holdesworthy, Langacre, Barnestaple, Combemartyn, Fremyngton, 'Southmolton,' Dertyngton and Wynkele (sic) and the said hundreds were held in chief by knight service, the manors of Blakeboruboty and Wynkele (sic) of others than the king, whereas in the last parliament the lords spiritual and temporal, being severally examined touching the interpretation of the answer aforesaid, averred advisedly that at the time the same was given, at the time of the late king's parliament, their intent was that John the son should sue for possession of the lands entailed which were not in the hands of the king or of his farmers against the tenants thereof, and not have livery by the course of the common law or otherwise contrary to the said answer, upon proof of the age of John de Holande the son before the late king's escheator in Devon, after view of the petition and answer and of the lords' interpretation, and also of the letters of King Richard touching the said manors and hundreds, and after deliberation with the justices, serjeants at law and others of the council learned in the law, it seemed to them that the manors of Barnestaple, Combemartyn, Fremyngton, 'Southmolton,' Dertyngton, Blakeboruboty and Wynkele and the said hundreds with the knights' fees, advowsons etc. thereto pertaining were given to the said earl as aforesaid, and at the time of his said parliament were in the hands of the late king, wherefore it was determined that John de Holande the son by authority of the said parliament and by advice of the council should have and sue livery thereof among other things, and the issues thereof taken since 29 March aforesaid, if he should think fit, and for a fine paid in the hanaper the late king respited until a day now past his homage and fealty due for the same and for lands entailed in other counties which descended to him, and commanded livery thereof to be given him, and the issues since the date aforesaid; and for another fine paid in the hanaper the king has respited until a day yet to come his homage and fealty for the lands of his heritage held by the said Elizabeth in fee tail, and those by her held in dower or otherwise for life, and on 8 March last commanded livery thereof to be given him; and the king has taken his homage. By p.s.