House of Lords Journal Volume 11: 19 April 1662

Page 433

Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 11, 1660-1666. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830.

This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

Page 433

In this section

DIE Saturni, 19 die Aprilis.

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:

His Royal Highness the Duke of Yorke.
Arch. Eborac.
Epus. London.
Epus. Durham.
Epus. Ely.
Epus. Oxon.
Epus. Bangor.
Epus. Sarum.
Epus. Worcester.
Epus. Lyncolne.
Epus. St. Asaph.
Epus. St. David's.
Epus. Petriburgh.
Epus. Landaffe.
Epus. Carlile.
Epus. Gloucester.
Epus. Cov. et Lich.
Epus. Hereford.
Ds. Cancellarius.
Ds. Custos Privati Sigilli.
Marq. Winton.
Marq. Dorchester.
L. Steward.
L. Chamberlain.
Comes Shrewsbury.
Comes Derby.
Comes Rutland.
Comes Lyncolne.
Comes Bridgwater.
Comes Devon.
Comes Denbigh.
Comes Bristoll.
Comes Bollingbrooke.
Comes Cleveland.
Comes Carnarvon.
Comes Newport.
Comes Chesterfeild.
Comes Portland.
Comes Norwich.
Comes Essex.
Comes Anglesey.
Comes Carlile.
Viscount Stafford.
Ds. Abergaveny.
Ds. Delawar.
Ds. Berkley de Berk.
Ds. Morley.
Ds. Eure.
Ds. Chandos.
Ds. Hunsdon.
Ds. Arundell.
Ds. Howard de Charlt.
Ds. Grey.
Ds. Craven.
Ds. Maynard.
Ds. Mohun.
Ds. Hatton.
Ds. Byron.
Ds. Carrington.
Ds. Ward.
Ds. Lucas.
Ds. Gerard de Brand.
Ds. Lexington.
Ds. Holles.
Ds. Ashley.
Ds. Crewe.


Bill to prevent the Importation of Bone Lace, &c.

The Lord Ashley reported, "That the Committee have considered the Bill prohibiting Importing of Foreign Bone Lace; and do think it sit to be passed as it is, without any Alterations."

The Question being put, "Whether this Bill shall pass?"

It was Resolved in the Affirmative.

Message to H. C. with Bills.

A Message was sent to the House of Commons, by Sir Thomas Escott and Sir Littleton:

To return unto them Two Bills, to which their Lordships do agree with some Alterations, and do desire the Concurrence of the Commons therein; one, concerning preventing of Frauds in His Majesty's Customs; the other, concerning the Pilchard Fishing.

The Messengers return with this Answer:


That they have delivered their Message to the House of Commons.

Bill for Money for Officers who served the King during the late Troubles.

Hodie 1a vice lecta est Billa, "An Act for Distribution of Threescore Thousand Pounds amongst the truly loyal and indigent Commissioned Officers; and for assessing of Offices, and distributing the Monies thereby raised for their future Supply."

Bill to illegitimate Ly. Roos's Child.

Hodie 1a vice lecta est Billa, "An Act for illegitimating of the Child named Ignotus, born of the Body of the Lady Anne Rossc."

The Question being put, "Whether this Bill shall be rejected?"

It was Resolved in the Negative.

ORDERED, That this Bill shall be read the Second Time on Tuesday Morning next.

Message from H. C. with Bills.

A Message was brought from the House of Commons, by George Fane Esquire and others; who brought up divers Bills:

1. To return the Bill concerning Prize Goods, sent to the Commons, with Alterations; to which the Commons do agree.

2. To return a Bill for confirming of Two Acts, therein mentioned; to which the Commons have assented, with an Addition for the Confirmation of an Act for naturalizing of Francis Hyde and others, and Two small Amendments occasioned thereby, to which the Commons desire their Lordships Concurrence.

3. A Bill for settling and confirming of the Manors of Framlingham and Saxted, in the County of Suffolke, and the Lands, Tenements, and Hereditaments, thereunto belonging, devised by Sir Robert Hitcham Knight, and late Serjeant at Law, to certain Charitable Uses; to which their Lordships Concurrence is desired.

4. "An Act for the repairing of Bengworth Bridge, in the County of Worcester;" to which their Lordships Concurrence is desired.

Silk Throwing Bill.

Hodie 3a vice lecta est Billa, "An Act for regulating the Trade of Silk Throwing."

The Question being put, "Whether this Bill shall pass?"

It was Resolved in the Affirmative.

Harding versus Pight, in Error.

Whereas, by an Order of this House, dated the 15th of this Instant April, Counsel was appointed to argue this Day the Writ of Error depending in this House, wherein Harding was Plaintiff, and Pight Defendant; at which Time the Counsel for the Defendant appeared at the Bar, and prayed the Record to be remitted, and the Judgement in the King's Bench to be affirmed; but the Plaintiff appeared not, by his Counsel or otherwise:

It is therefore ORDERED, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Record is hereby remitted, and the Judgement in the King's Bench is affirmed, that Execution may be taken out, according to Course, the said Writ of Error notwithstanding; and that the Plaintiff, for his vexatious and unjust Proceedings, shall forthwith, after Sight hereof, pay unto the said Defendant the Sum of Twenty Pounds Costs.

Yates versus Hoskins, in Error.

ORDERED, That the Errors between Yates Plaintiff and Hoskins Defendant shall be argued, by Counsel on both Sides, at this Bar, on Monday Morning next.


Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque in diem Lunæ, videlicet, 21um diem instantis Aprilis, 1662, hora decima Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus.