Charles I - volume 375: Undated 1637

Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Charles I, 1637-8. Originally published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1869.

This premium content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.

'Charles I - volume 375: Undated 1637', in Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Charles I, 1637-8, (London, 1869) pp. 49-69. British History Online https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-state-papers/domestic/chas1/1637-8/pp49-69 [accessed 19 April 2024]

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Undated 1637

1. Observations by Secretary Coke on the Statutes or Articles of Eltham, for the regulation of the King's household, and how far they affected various suggested alterations proposed to be made at this time. [4½ pp.]
2. Orders under the King's hand for the establishment of government in the Court, collected out of the ancient ordinances of the King's House, and commanded to be duly observed. [Copy. 16½ pp.]
3. Observations of the Avenor upon the Articles of Eltham so far as they relate to the management of the royal stables. [2 pp.]
4. Copy orders established for regulation of the Office of the Robes, with suggestion of [Sir Bevis Thelwall], Clerk of the Robes, that in conformity with the same orders all bills upon the office should be checked by himself as clerk, as well as by Mr. Kirke, the Gentleman of the Robes. [1 p.]
5. Another copy of the orders established for regulation of the Office of the Robes, with comments of [Sir Bevis Thelwall] on the results of the breach of the rule that his signature should be required to tradesmen's bills as well as that of the Gentleman of the Robes. [Copy. 2 pp.]
6. Report of a Commission appointed to inquire concerning the observance of the orders established for regulation of the Office of the Wardrobes and Robes, stating the nature of the question in dispute, as to the signature of the clerk, and the explanations in reference to the same given by the clerk which had been satisfactory to Mr. Kirke. [3¼ pp.]
7. Information of Sir Bevis Thelwall, Clerk of the Great Wardrobe, in reference to certain breaches of his Majesty's orders for regulation of that office, and the misconduct of two of the officers named Thomas Ripplingham and [William ?] Ripplingham. [¾ p.]
8. Petition of Robert Tias to the King. His grandfather and father lived in the office of clerk and under-clerk of the Great Wardrobe, during the reigns of Queens Mary, Elizabeth, and 18 years of King James I., and petitioner has been educated therein. Thomas Ripplingham being dead, who was in reversion after Sir Bevis Thelwall, now Clerk of the Great Wardrobe, petitioner prays a grant to succeed Sir Bevis. [½ p.]
9. The Avenor's reasons for not swearing to the parcel for the expense of the stable. The compositions are received and issued by the purveyors and garnitors, who are, therefore, the fittest men to swear to the parcel. [½ p.]
10. List of carriages attending the King and Queen upon removals. [Endorsed, "Carts are now used." Among the persons provided for on the Queen's side are her Majesty's dwarfs, her monkeys and dogs, and "the billiard board." 3 pp.]
11. Number and description of servants appointed to attend on Prince Charles and the Princess Mary below stairs, with their wages and diet. [¾ p.]
12. Petition of four grooms of the Queen's Chamber to Sec. Windebank. Were behind of their wages one half-year, due six years since, amounting to 73l., for which her Majesty lately sent Sir Thomas Stafford to the Commissioners of the Treasury. Petitioners have no other allowance but this fee of 2s. a day; the gentlemen-ushers and others having two or three fees apiece, were lately paid all due to them. [2/3 p.]
13. Minute of warrant for Francis Phillips, Auditor for Northampton, Rutland, and other counties, to be received and lodged as he travels up and down on his Majesty's service. [⅓ p.]
14. Account of fees paid for Lord Carnarvon on his creation as Viscount and Earl. [¾ p.]
15. Petition of John Gaspar Wolffen, his Majesty's servant, to the King. When Mr. Burlamachi made up his accounts, by an error he took 270l. of petitioner's moneys, and gave it to his Majesty in his accounts. On complaint to the Council, the business was referred to four Aldermen, who found that the 270l. was to be allowed by the King to Mr. Burlamachi or else paid to petitioner. Urgently prays payment. [1 p.]
16. Declaration [by Philip Burlamachi ?] of the state of the business concerning the King's jewels pledged in Holland. Job Harby having been met in his endeavour to settle the accounts and redeem the jewels by unanticipated demands on the part of Philip Calandrini, at variance with his accounts previously rendered, an appeal had been made to the Courts of Law in Holland. Burlamachi insists that without litigation all the difficulties would be cleared up by the production of the original contracts. [French. 3¼ pp.]
17. Information of some person whose name is not stated, probably addressed to Sec. Coke, respecting the abuse of transportation of gold and coin by aliens from several ports, masters and owners of ships called "skippers." These persons omit to account in the customer's books for goods brought in by them, and transport great store of coin received from merchants, to be delivered to their factors in foreign parts. Prays him to signify the same to his Majesty. [½ p.]
18. Petition of Jacob de Leau, factor, to the King. Petitioner is questioned for transporting money into France. He only, according to his commission, consigned the same to John Parrett of Dover, merchant, who, without his privity, transported the same to Michael Huse, factor, at Calais. Petitioner received no more profit by the same money, but only his accustomed salary of 6s. 8d. per cent. Prays that he may be clearly acquitted. [1 p.]
19. Petition of "the most distressed Charles Lord Stanhope" to Archbishop Laud. His father left him estated in the office of Postmaster General of England, and gave him the less estate during his mother's life. Having surrendered his patent, his means are so small and his debts so great that he cannot live in quiet for the outcry of his creditors, and his mother during her life keeps three parts of his estate from him, and will part with nothing to relieve him. Petitioning the King, he was appointed to apply to the Secretaries of State. Sec. Coke answers him that the King long since said that his mother had money enough. Prays the archbishop to speak to Secs. Coke and Windebank, to present his petition to his Majesty, that he may receive the arrears of his fees, to enable him to free himself from the clamours of his creditors. [½ p.]
20. Observations by Sec. Windebank for recalling the patent formerly granted to Mr. Witherings to be Postmaster for foreign parts. The principal grounds assigned are;—the inconvenience of suffering such an office to remain in the hands of a person who is no sworn officer. Suspicion that his patent was surreptitiously obtained. No signed bill was found. Persons who hold the office of postmaster abroad are of so great quality that they disdain to correspond with a man of his mean condition. Some satisfaction may be given him, but he has very much enriched himself upon the place. He is said to be worth 800l. a year in land. The office of Postmaster General being now vested in the Secretaries, the carrying of letters is a business of state. If Witherings shall insist upon his patent, his Majesty may sequester the place into the hands of the Secretaries. [2¼ pp.]
21. Petition of Thomas Cole to Secs. Coke and Windebank. John Lord Stanhope, being Master and Comptroller General of the Posts, appointed Thomas Clarke, and petitioner after his death, to be post of London for the packet; viz., from London to Waltham northwards and to Dartford southwards. In November last Clarke was suspended and has since died. Prays appointment according to the grant of Lord Stanhope. [2/3 p.]
22. Duplicate of the same. [2/3 p.]
23. Printed bill, which announces that the Count de la Tour and Tassis, General Hereditary of the Post of the Emperor and of the King of Spain in his Low Countries, Burgundy, &c., undertakes not only to perform the agreement made between the said Count and Thomas Witherings and William Frizell in 1633, but to improve it by expediting the mail in sundry particulars which involved a reduction in the time for conveying the letters to and from London and Antwerp and Brussels from 4 or 5 days to 2 or 3, and to and from Naples to 18 and 19 days instead of 23 and 24, with a proportionate reduction in all intermediate places. [2½ pp.]
24. Petition of John Wytton, Deputy Postmaster of the Court, daily attending your Majesty, to the King. For his wages of 10s. per diem there is due to him about 1,400l., neither has he allowance of diet or horsemeat or any other perquisites, the nonpayment whereof has brought him much into debt. Some of his creditors have petitioned the Lord Chamberlain to have the benefit of the law against him. He has granted the request unless petitioner give satisfaction by the middle of Michaelmas term. Prays that the Lord Treasurer may make present payment of what is due to petitioner, and meanwhile that he may have a protection, [1 p.]
25. Certificate of Richard Wakeman. There was a petition, subscribed the 19th June last, at the request of Mr. Witherings, Postmaster, desiring his Majesty to continue him in the execution of that place. We were abused by his pretending that some great persons intended to obtain the office of his Majesty, to the prejudice of merchants and trade. Although we are not aggrieved by Mr. Witherings in the dispatch of letters for foreign parts, or in their postage, yet we believe the office of Postmaster being under the supervision of the Secretaries of State the merchants shall have no cause to complain, but rather receive favour by the speedy conveyance of their letters. [The paper runs in the plural number, but has only one signature. 2/3 p.]
26. Petition of John Castlon, Postmaster, to Sec. Windebank. John Bulwer has lately petitioned for leave to sue petitioner for 10l. 10s. which he pretends to be due. Petitioner can make it appear by an acquittance under Bulwer's hand for 3l. 10s., and otherwise, that there cannot be above one quarter's rent due to Bulwer, viz., Midsummer quarter 1637, and that petitioner ought not to pay that in respect of agreements unfulfilled by Bulwer. [2/3 p.]
27. Petition of David Francis, late Post of Northop, to Secs. Coke and Windebank. There is 90l. in arrear to petitioner for execution of the said place, as appears by the last account of Lord Stanhope to the auditors. Has been three months in town soliciting payment, and received fair promises from Mr. Witherings, but now he absolutely says petitioner shall have none, so that he is like to be imprisoned. Has spent near his whole estate in coming to town to solicit for his father's arrears, who was Post of Chester 60 years. Prays order to receive part with the rest who are in the privy seal, otherwise he is like to perish by the prosecution of his greedy creditors. [2/3 p.]
28. Petition of Richard Scott, innkeeper of Stilton, co. Huntingdon, to Secs. Coke and Windebank. For some few years past the place of Post of Stilton, being in the high north road, has been executed by a deputy, who keeps an alehouse there, the Postmaster living twelve miles distant, and his deputy no ways able to receive gentlemen and travellers, much less noblemen, whereby the posts are forced to travel at unseasonable times and are not fitted with able horses. Petitioner being an innkeeper in the town, both able and willing to give noblemen and gentlemen entertainment, prays that he may serve his Majesty in that place. [1 p.]
29. Petition of Thomas Parks, Postmaster from London to Barnet, to Sec. Windebank. Has executed that office about six years, which has stood him in 180l., without any neglect, as Mr. Railton can inform you, and has received but two years' pay at the rate of 20d. per diem. Notwithstanding his diligence, Mr. Witherings endeavours to bring in another, and has already taken from petitioner the through posts' place of Charing Cross, which cost petitioner 63l. 6s. Prays order to Witherings to deliver petitioner his orders and confirm him in his place. [1 p.]
30. Petition of Anthony Penniston to the King. Francis Ewens was indebted to petitioner 600l., and held a lease of Herriotts, co. Radnor. Petitioner being indebted to your Majesty extended the lease and had it assigned to him. Living in London, petitioner appointed one Phillips to receive the profits and pay your Majesty's rent, and afterwards assigned the lease to Mr. Joyner, but Phillips having made some default, one Wynne procured a new lease. Prays reference to the Commissioners of the King's revenue as Prince of Wales to vacate the new lease. [¾ p.]
31. Petition of Sir Basil Brooke to the same. The 5,000l. which his Majesty had accepted in satisfaction of damages done by petitioner in the Forest of Dean had been paid more than half a year. Sir John Wintour, hoping to procure a like defalcation, had used means to stay the pardon granted to petitioner, though it had received the King's signature nine months since, and Mr. Mynne's pardon had been long since sealed and delivered to him. Petitioner has yielded up his patent, and delivered possession of the iron works. Has been at great charge by his long attendance in these infectious times. Prays that his pardon may be speedily sealed. [1 p.]
32. Petition of the same to the same. Petitioner paid 5,000l. for the fine laid upon him jointly with Mr. Mynne. Mr. Mynne, having paid 7,000l., presses petitioner, upon point of partnership, to pay him 1,000l. and 332l. 16s. interest, and upon that pretence has seized upon 2,000l. partible between them, by reason of the wire works which they hold in partnership. As his Majesty best knows upon what grounds their pardons were granted, petitioner prays him to declare his pleasure concerning the money paid by them severally. [1 p.]
33. Proposition for taking a new farm of Dean Forest upon terms more advantageous to the King. [It is the proposition (slightly varied) of John Broughton, already calendared in Vol. ccclxi., No. 48 i. 1 p.]
34. Sir Baynham Throgmorton to Endymion Porter. I am bold to present you an account what I did with my Lord Chamberlain. When I had informed him of the abuse committed by the farmers of the iron works in the Forest of Dean, he told me he would by no means countenance them in any dishonest thing, but else, because they chose him for their protector, and for his brother's sake that made them the grant, he should be willing to do them all courtesy. I perceive he is willing things may be examined, and as they prove against them, which I am sure will be foul, he would not meddle with it. My occasions hasten me into the country. I desire you will be a friend to us in this business, which being neglected our poor forest is ruined. The bearer, Mr. Bainbridge, is able to inform you of all particulars. [1 p.]
35. Petition of John Williams, prisoner in Newgate, to the Council. Has remained in prison for five years for being one at the depopulation of the Forest of Dean. Prays enlargement, not having wherewith to maintain himself in prison, with his wife and poor children. [2/3 p.]
36. Petition of Henry Earl of Huntingdon to the King. Was Lieutenant of your Majesty's late Forest of Leicester for life by gift of King James, which forest, about ten years since, was disafforested. Your Majesty thought petitioner worthy of recompense, whereupon he was to have received 400 acres out of the forest, but before the Earl of Marlborough, then Lord Treasurer, and the other referees, made their certificate, the ground was disposed of. Subsequently, at the suit of your subject's late wife, he was to have been recompensed by the lands of Sir Miles Hobart, deceased, if the same should fall to your Majesty, as they did, yet your Majesty was pleased to dispose of the same otherwise. Sir William Faunt was sentenced in the Star Chamber, on 19th October last, at petitioner's suit, for writing a libellous letter, whereby your service was much prejudiced, for which he was fined 5,000l. Prays a grant of the said fine in recompense for the said office. [2/3 p.] Annexed,
36. i. Statement of the profits of Lieutenant of the Forest of Leicester. Total, per annum, 336l. 9s. 1d. Besides which there were claims for compensation on a variety of other grounds which are here fully stated. [¾ p.]
37. Petition of George Johnson, late woollen draper to his Majesty, to the King. Your Majesty granted petitioner a privy seal for 4,853l. 17s. 1d. for cloth by him sold, and caused payment of 2,000l. in part of the same, so that there remains 2,853l. 17s. 1d., for want of which he was enforced to take up large sums on interest, and since to give over his trade, and become keeper in Brogborough Park in the honour of Ampthill. Having disbursed more than the principal for interest, he shall by this means be certainly ruined, and his friends who are his sureties. Prays order for a tally upon the receiver of the iron-works of the Forest of Dean due at Christmas 1638, or upon the new increase of wines to be paid by Sir Abraham Dawes at Michaelmas 1638 for the remainder of the said debt. [1 p.]
38. Petition of George Lord Chandos, your Majesty's ward, to the same. Upon your Majesty's late inclosure of the Forest of Braydon in Wilts, the lords of manors adjoining improved their waste grounds. Petitioner having the manor of Minety, with 1,200 acres of waste, his late guardian, Alice Countess Dowager of Derby, and his present guardian, Henry Earl of Manchester, have endeavoured to improve the same, but found the greatest obstacle, that the manor being held in capite, petitioner's tenants refuse to consent unless he can procure ground allotted to them to be holden in socage. Prays order for alteration of the tenure of the said allotments, and reference to Lord Cottington, Master of the Wards, and the Attorney-General. [1 p.]
39. Petition of Endymion Porter, your Majesty's servant, to the King. The forest of Exmoor, in Devon and Somerset, is in lease from your Majesty for divers years to come, under yearly rents amounting to 48l. 13s. 4d. Prays a grant of the same in fee farm, in consideration of his long service, with a tenure in socage, and the liberty of disafforestation. [2/3 p.]
40. Petition of Thomas Jerves to Sec. Windebank. King's Sedgmoor in Somerset has been proved to be the King's inheritance, wherefore King James resolved to make it a leading case, but now of necessity it must be a redeeming case, and not be sold from the crown, if there might be a million given for it. Petitioner's request is, that for the love that he bears to the general good, he may have warrant to go down amongst the inhabitants in 26 manors near adjoining, that they may give their advice which way it may be advanced to his Majesty's profit and the general good. Petitioner doubts not to bring such an answer as will be very pleasing to his Majesty and all his subjects. [½ p.]
41. Offer made by Thomas Lord Arundel of Wardour to sell Wardour to the King. Will accept for it some reversion or office or annual pension, with the rangership for his life. His son Thomas desires not to have it; it is too great a house for his son William, and he must leave it for payment of debts and raising portions for younger children. His Majesty has about Salisbury great command of fallow deer in Clarington [Clarendon] Park, in Cranborne Chase, and in Grovely, yet has he no park of red-deer, nor any house of his own fit to entertain his Majesty or the Queen. [1 p.]
42. Petition of inhabitants of Bolingbroke, co. Lincoln, consisting of 19 townships, being free commoners in that part of Wildmore called the Earl's Fen, to the King. For approving their said common, petitioners have made and repaired two great drains, which cost them 2,500l., whereby the fen for all the summer season is laid usefully dry, but of late, by defects in the banks of the Witham and Hildick, which ought to be repaired by others, and by water coming from the East Fen, which is to be drained another way, the waters of the said rivers and fen have overflown some part of the said common, whereupon the undertakers for draining in this extreme wet winter time have procured commissioners being strangers to adjudge 600 acres of dry ground, and as many acres that are not five months in a year at all wet, to be surrounded. Pray that the noisome waters may be kept from surrounding petitioners' common, and that in the meantime the King will withhold his assent from taking away petitioners' common until fully informed of the truth. [¾ p.] Underwritten,
42. i. Minute of answer that the King's intention was only for the improvement of wet grounds usually and hurtfully surrounded, and the Earls of Lindsey and Dorset were to certify. [Endorsed: "Earl of Stamford." ¼ p.]
43. The King to certain persons to be therein named and appointed Commissioners of Sewers for a level in co. Lincoln. Recites letters of 15 March 1636-7, whereby directions were given to the then Commissioners of Sewers for that level concerning 1,000 acres intended for the poor, and 1,500 acres to be tied for the maintenance of the works, as also for draining the level. The King, intending that the directions in those letters should be pursued, appoints the persons now addressed Commissioners of Sewers for that level, and commands them to carry out the former letters in a way which is here set forth; and that, with reference to a complaint of the inhabitants of Bolingbroke, they were to certify the King, that he might give direction therein as should be just. [Draft. 2½ pp.] Underwritten,
43. i. Robert Long to Mr. Peacock. This is the letter which I have drawn, and think fit to be presented by Mr. Kirke to to Sec. Windebank, for his Majesty's signature. [½ p.]
44. The King to [persons to be named]. For a great sum of money paid by Sir Peregrine Bertie and Sir Philip Landen, deceased, we, in August 1636, granted them divers marshes in cos. Lincoln and Cambridge, which they were to embank, and to answer a feefarm rent for the same. As yet, little benefit has been reaped from our grant, by reason of the opposition of persons who pretend interest in the said marshes. Desiring to avoid unnecessary suits, we require you to compose the said differences as you shall think fit. And we give you leave to signify that, as we shall take it to be an acceptable service from such as shall comply in performance of a work tending so much to our honour and the good of the realm, so we shall show our displeasure and use our power against such as shall refuse to accept our grace and favour herein. [Draft or copy. 1 p.]
45. Certain citizens of London to the King. There are 10,000 or 12,000 acres of fen lying in the Great Level in the Isle of Ely belonging to the King. Offer 16,000l. for the same. [⅓ p.]
46. Report of Joseph Butler and Jasper Heiley, messengers of the Chamber, employed by warrant of Sec. Windebank into the Great Level of the Fens, to apprehend persons found disturbing the works of draining. Near Wicken, co. Cambridge, they met Peter Jarvis, constable. He persuaded them not to adventure into Wicken, the people being prepared to resist, and those of Soame [Soham?], Burrack, and Sopham having agreed to help them. Ultimately, the messengers, with the constable and the minister of the parish, entered the town, the messengers being on horseback. The people came out with pitchforks and poles, and gathered round a place where great heaps of stones were laid. Amongst them, John Moreclack, a principal rioter, was charged to obey the Council's warrant. When the messengers approached him, he pushed at them with his pike. The people prepared to assist him, and the women got together to the heaps of stones to throw at the messengers, who were scoffed at and abused by the whole multitude. [1½ p.]
47. Paper endorsed "Answer to the Earl of Lincoln's petition." The question in dispute between the Earl and the answerers was the sufficiency of certain drainage of fens in Lincolnshire. The petitioners state their case in reply to the Earl, and give the names in the margin of persons who will prove their assertions. Much of the damage complained of by the Earl was set down to the peculiar wetness of the season, and other parts of it to the violent interruptions of the people, who threw down the banks and dammed up the works. [6¾ pp.]
48. Petition of John Liens to the King. In 1635, petitioner, being director of the work of draining Hatfield Chase, the adventurers made an agreement with the inhabitants of Sykehouse and Fishlake for damages sustained before petitioner was director, for payment of a great sum, which is all paid but 600l., and petitioner was induced to set his hand to the said agreement. The inhabitants now fall upon petitioner for the 600l. Petitioner is employed in draining the Eight Hundred Fen for your Majesty's service, under the Earl of Lindsey. Prays a protection for one year. [2/3 p.]
49. Petition of Henry Earl of Dover to the Council. States the circumstances under which a decree had lately been made against petitioner by the Commissioners of Sewers for some part of Yorkshire, for raising a mill-dam upon the river Don, about 20 years before, in the lordship of Conisborough, to the prejudice of the town of Mexborough. Petitioner prayed a reference to the judges, or the determination of the case by the Council. [This petition was probably presented in May 1637. Subsequent proceedings in reference to the same subject are calendared in Vol. ccclv., No. 166; Vol. ccclvi., No. 158; and Vol. ccclvii., No. 61. 1 p.]
50. Minute of an information that the miller of the King's feefarm mills at Purfleet at every spring tide lets in so much water as drowns the meadow ground adjoining; also that the owners of the meadows, not keeping their ditches scoured, the water has not its free return. An order of the Board is desired for stinting the miller to the marks on two posts set up for that purpose, and enjoining the owners of the meadows to see to the scouring of their ditches. [2/3 p.]
51. Petition of Capt. Francis Wrenham to the King. Prays the King, by himself or his Council, to be informed in the equity of petitioner's cause, and in the interim to direct that no grant may pass of petitioner's 500 acres in Sutton Marsh. [½ p.] Annexed,
51. i. Particulars of his case above alluded to. In 1630 he purchased 500 acres of Sutton Marsh. For recovery thereof, he was cast upon a suit which cost him 1,000l. Obtaining a decree from the Lord Keeper in July 1634, he was, for settling the land, ordered to pay 800l. above the purchase money. Being thus in possession under a royal grant, his first year's crop was swept away for an arrear of rent for 18 years under a grant of the late King; he had poor crops the two subsequent years; and now a claim had been set up to the land itself, under another grant from the Crown to the inhabitants of the Marsh, said to have been surreptitiously obtained by the contrivance of William Tipper, and by an arrangement with Mr. Wimberley, [Imperfect. 1 p.]
52. The King to Attorney-General Bankes. Captain Thomas Whitmore has repaired our decayed copper mines in Cumberland, and Thomas Bushell has the sole working of our mines in co. Cardigan. They have found out a way to prepare ores holding silver so as by water they can separate the silver without melting. You are to prepare a grant to them of their invention for the term by statute limited, reserving the tenth part of the silver to be gained, and thereby also to constitute them Surveyors-General of all mines royal within England and Wales during the said term, with the fee of four nobles yearly, authorizing them to search for metals in any grounds within England and Wales, to the end that the silver therein may be separated according to their invention. [Draft, probably of a suggested grant. 2/3 p.]
53. Offer to discover concealed lands in co. Warwick belonging to the Prince, provided the proposer may have a lease of the same for 21 years. [Endorsed by Nicholas, "Mr. Ashbourneham for Sir Charles Herbert." 2/3 p.]
54. Articles to be inquired of within the archdeaconry of Buckingham, at the visitation of the archdeacon there this present year 1637. The articles are 53 in number, and run into a variety of minute particulars. Appended is the tenor of the oath to be ministered to churchwardens and sworn men. [Printed at London, by T.P., 1637, 4to. 8 pp.]
55. The King to the [Bailiffs and Burgesses of Shrewsbury]. The parish church of [St.] Chad's, in Shrewsbury, being sometime a college of priests, and devolved to the Crown, the cure thereof ought to be served by two stipendiary curates, who receive their wages out of our Exchequer; but you, having possessed yourselves of the Easter book of that church, and some other things conveyed to you in trust, have appointed your curate to be preacher; and the late curate and preacher being preferred to a living, Richard Poole, clerk, by colour of a popular election, has thrust himself into that place, having already two benefices in another diocese. By the advice of the Archbishop of Canterbury we have made choice of George Lawson, clerk, late curate of Mainstone, in the diocese of Hereford, to be curate and preacher of that church, and have directed the Bishop of Lichfield and Coventry to remove Richard Poole, and to admit and licence George Lawson; and we command you to yield ready obedience thereto. [2¾ pp.]
56. Account of the revenues settled on the church of St. Chad's, in Shrewsbury, the clear total being 65l. 16s. 8d.; also of the vicarage of Chirbury, anciently endowed but with 9l. 6s. 8d. per annum; but the rectory being vested in the bailiffs and burgesses of Shrewsbury, in trust for the free-school there, it was agreed that 50l. per annum should be settled on the vicarage, whereupon the said vicarage was endowed with the tithes of a township of that amount. [¾ p.]
57. Award of Archbishop Laud in a dispute between the Bishop of Hereford and the dean and chapter there, as to whether the bishop, having a right to visit the cathedral of Hereford and the peculiars of the said dean and chapter, the same right could be exercised by his vicar-general, registrar, and other officers, and how long the said visitation, when it should happen, should last. The archbishop determined the right in favour of the vicar-general and registrar, but limited the duration of such visitation to three months. [Rough draft. Lat. 3 pp.]
58. Judgment of Bishop White, of Ely, and other judges delegates, in a cause of appeal between Robert Viscount Kilmorey and Sir John Corbet, patron of the parish church of Adderley in Salop, and Edward Wolley, rector of the same church, respecting the rights of the chapel of the Holy Trinity at Shavington. The judges quashed the decision of the court below, and declared it lawful to perform divine service and administer sacraments in the chapel in question, the same being the private chapel or oratory of Viscount Kilmorey and other inhabitants of the house of Shavington. [Latin. Not fully signed. One skin of parchment.]
59. Opinion of Dr. Thomas Rives, the King's Advocate, concerning his Majesty's title to the prebend of Wetwang, co. York, for so much as concerns the union of it to the deanery of Christ's Church, in Oxford. It had been contended that the union was not good, inasmuch as the deanery was not a separate body, but only part of the aggregate body of dean and chapter. Dr. Rives was of opinion that by the Canon Law it sufficed if the thing to which the union was made was a benefice, which he contended the deanery was. [12/3 p.] Annexed,
59. i. Statement of the case for the prebend of Wetwang, showing by what acts the union above mentioned had been effected. [1 p.]
60. The Dean and Chapter of Canterbury to Archbishop Laud. Copy of a letter, the original of which is dated "April 1637," and is already calendared in Vol. cccliv., No. 175. [2 pp.]
61. Case, and opinion thereon, of Sir Edward Littleton, SolicitorGeneral, on the title to the prebend of Sutton-cum-Buckiugham, [in the cathedral of Lincoln,] which was stated to have been surrendered to the Crown by the holder thereof in the time of Edward VI., and to have been granted out to a person designated as A. The SolicitorGeneral was of opinion that, if the prebend were presentative, A had no good title under his grant, and that the Crown might now present. [Copy. 2 pp.]
62. Another copy of the same. [2 pp.]
63. Notes on the text, "per me reges regnant," perhaps compiled with a view to a sermon. There are references to other texts of Scripture, to St. Augustine, Bellarmine, Bishops Andrewes, Buckeridge, and others. [32/3 pp.]
64. Notes by Archbishop Laud, in the nature of a catalogue of papers entitled the "Second Bundle of Papers," consisting of 12 articles. They consisted of documents relating to religious matters in the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and James I. Endorsed by Sir Joseph Williamson, "King's power in the Church—new Discipline." [1½ p.]
65. Note of an order of the King in Council, that orders of 29th March and 30th May 1637 should be vacated, and that all rates made by the bailiffs and others of a town not named, by virtue thereof should be void, and that the nomination of the stipendiary ministers to certain parishes not named should remain as before the said orders were made. [⅓ p.]
66. Information or remembrance to the King, touching his Majesty's right to the impropriate rectory and right of presentation to the vicarage of Croston, co. Lancaster. The vicarage had been endowed above 200 years ago by the abbess of Sion. At the suppression it came to the Crown. A lease was granted for 99 years in the 30th Henry VIII., which is now nearly out. [2/3 p.]
67. Statement entitled "the estate of the vicarage of Berwickupon-Tweed." The Dean and Chapter of Durham, being owners of the impropriate rectory, have let the same to laymen, and paid the vicar incumbent 20l. per annum. In the time of Elizabeth, the garrison being strengthened, the inhabitants subscribed for maintaining two able ministers. On the accession of King James he granted a pension of 20l. to each of the ministers, and of late both these pensions are conferred on the vicar, and are all his maintenance, except the payment from the dean and chapter; and the other minister is lately provided by the charity of the Mercers of London with 50l. yearly It is suggested that royal letters should be procured to the Bishop and Dean and Chapter of Durham, requiring that the vicar be admitted tenant to the dean and chapter of the impropriate rectory, in place of the now tenants, William Rosden and John Saltonstall, paying the same yearly rent, and Rosden and Saltonstall being recompensed by the Commissioners for disposing of moneys given in pios uses. [2⅓ pp.] Underwritten,
67. i. [Some one unnamed to Sec. Windebank ?] Recommends that the Archbishop of York should be advised with, who would prove a great furtherer towards his Majesty and the Archbishop of Canterbury, and also with the dean and divers of the prebends of Durham. [¼ p.]
68. Sir James Douglas to [Robert] Reed. His Majesty has considered that whereas the lecturer of Berwick has 60l. per annum, the vicar, Gilbert Durie, has only in stipend 20 marks, his other helps being only benevolence, whereof his Majesty pays 40l., which the vicar is willing to relinquish if the dean and chapter will receive him as tenant in place of William Rosden and John Saltonstall, as also the vicar will repay William Rosden the 400l. he disbursed. As for Saltonstall, he came unjustly by his lease, and has made yearly more profit by it than it cost him. [Incomplete. 2/3 p.]
69. Petition of Peter Walter, John Crispe, and Ralph [?] Masterman, styling themselves the four old vicars [of Lincoln], probably addressed to the ecclesiastical visitors on the suspension of Bishop Williams, setting forth various grievances and oppressions, chiefly in money payments, at the hands of the residentiaries of the cathedral. [1 p.]
70. Petition of Paul Hood, D.D., to the King. In the schedules annexed are expressed the great wrongs which Bishop Williams of Lincoln and Hamlet Marshall, D.D., have done to petitioner. Prays a reference for examination and redress. [⅓ p.] Annexed,
70. i. Schedule of the injuries done to petitioner. Dr. Hood having the prebend of Kilsby, in the cathedral of Lincoln, and Hamlet Marshall, the chaunter [precentor], having the prebend of South Scarle, Marshall claimed Kilsby as annexed to his chauntership. The bishop arbitrated between them, and awarded in favour of Marshall upon certain terms, one of which was that he should resign the prebend of South Scarle to Hood. Hood had given up Kilsby, but could not obtain South Scarle. [= 2 pp.]
71. Minute of his Majesty's desire that Sec. Windebank should put him in mind of recommending Sir John Monson to the Lords and Judges, that in the Bishop of Lincoln's cause they may give him a repair in reputation proportionable to the injuries he has suffered through the bishop's means for doing his Majesty's service. [⅓ p.]
72. Minute of an application to be made to his Majesty. William Parkinson and others, having become very poor men through the Bishop of Lincoln's molesting them with a suit in the Star Chamber, because they would not forswear themselves against his Majesty, his Majesty promised them 100l. out of the bishop's fine. Thomas Lund, Cadwalader Powell, and George Walker, three others that were fined together with the bishop, have since done very good service to his Majesty in revealing several foul misdemeanours committed by the bishop, and discovering the conveyances of his estate, and are to do further service therein, it is suggested that his Majesty should remit to Lund, Powell, and Walker their fines, they paying Parkinson and others the 100l. [1½ p.]
73. Petition of the Dean and Chapter of York to the King. The King, for preservation of the solemnity of divine service in some of his cathedral churches, and for the good of the inhabitants of those cities, has required the mayors, aldermen, and their companies to frequent those holy places on Sundays and holy days with all due reverence, and that the mayors should not use the ensigns of their authority within his Majesty's cathedral churches. Pray the King to cast a similar gracious eye upon the cathedral church of York. [Endorsed by Sec. Coke, "Doctor Stanhope;" and see Calendar notice of Vol. ccclxiii., No. 9. 2/3 p.]
74. Theological treatise upon vows stated in the endorsement to have been propounded by Mr. White, of Dorchester, and to have been answered by Mr. Ironside, a minister. The only answer that here appears consists of two notes on the first page. [6¼ pp.]
75. Comments upon a book termed "The Direction." The author of it moves the writer's passion when he writes of Protestantism waxing weary of itself, and of some of their chiefs who allow what sometime they condemned, and especially in what he brings from "The Coal from the Altar," and out of "Sunday no Sabbath." He helps the Puritans to cavil against that which was so evidently spoken in "Sunday no Sabbath" against the Centurists. The State should look to this man, and Signor Coneo and Signor Gregorio [Panzani] should be thoroughly informed of his exasperating vein. Perhaps he thought to make the Archbishop of Canterbury take occasion to complain of the Bishop of Lincoln upon it; yet he gives even the Archbishop of Canterbury cause of exception to him, though he seems to flatter him. [2/3 p.]
76. Articles objected by the Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical against Thomas Colebeach, parson of Ludlow; Matthew Clarke, parson of Bitterley; Thomas Archley, curate of Hopton-in-the-Hole, Salop. These persons were charged with omitting to wear the surplice, omitting to bow at the name of Jesus, omitting to stand up at the reading of the creed, and admitting persons to receive the communion who did not kneel; also with various irregularities in solemnizing matrimony. [13½ pp.]
77. Articles objected by the same Commissioners against Francis Saunders, late of Shangton, co. Leicester, and then of Stamford, co. Lincoln. He was charged that there having been in his house, or that of William Stafford, of Blatherwick, at Christmas time, a lord of misrule, he and others had appointed that the lord of misrule must have for a lady or Christmas wife, one Elizabeth Pitto, daughter of the hog-heard of the town; whereupon, defendant putting on a gown, and a shirt or smock for a surplice, read the words set down in the form of marriage in the Book of Common Prayer, putting a ring upon the finger of the woman, and going through the rest of the ceremony, and afterwards, at night, putting the parties into a bed together. Defendant was also charged with being a swearer and drunkard. [4¾ pp.]
78. Statement of Henry Page, Vicar of Ledbury, co. Hereford, in reply to articles against him, before the same Commissioners. He altogether denies the inconformity with which he is charged, but admits that in his catechising there slipped from him the following irreverent words:— "Why might it not be as lawful to pull at a cart-rope as a bell-rope on a Sunday?" He submits to make any acknowledgment or submission, and charges the institution of the suit as an act of malice upon Thomas Cox of his parish, whom he had presented for living in open adultery. [¼ p.]
79. Instructions for articles to be preferred against Dr. Holmes before the Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes. He is charged with almost all variety of clerical misdoing then alleged against inconformable clergymen. Amongst other things, with speaking "unreverently" in the pulpit, using these words, viz., "the drunken knave priest;" with never reading the Book of Liberty; with speaking very unreverently and rudely against the reverend bishops; with preaching for divers Sundays together "in the pew and in the pulpit four sermons in a day;" with baptising his own child without the sign of the cross; with being passionate, and speaking angerly in the church, and in the church in his anger calling the writer of the present paper "mutcha-vile;" with allowing strangers, after evening sermon on Sunday, to resort to his house, so as we can see he does but "hover with all the ceremonies;" and many other similar offences. [2¾ pp.]
80. Information that George Buncle, a recusant, baptised his own child, using the ordinary words, and pulling a glass of water out of his pocket. Mrs. Ferrabosco, grandmother to the child, desired that it might be christened according to the rites of the Church of England. [Endorsed, "Dr. Wood's note.—His Grace would have Buncle called into the High Commission, and upon his answer it may be seen what is further to be done." ⅓ p.]
81. Information of words spoken by Mr. Oldham, parson of Shipton Moyne, co. Gloucester, in preaching on the 20th and 23rd August. The words quoted are in derogation of the cathedral service and of pictures of the Saviour. He also complained of the want of able counsellors; that the people were contented with the present ill-government; that pulpit-men upheld all, of whom as yet there was a good number, though they were daily cut off for toys and trifles. Speaking of the buying and selling of places, he said, "all things are to be sold at Rome." [2/3 p.]
82. Information by [Mr. Flamsteed?] of words spoken by George Catesby, living about Ecton, co. Northampton, or in Bloomsbury "towards the fields," with a view to the exhibition of articles against him in the High Commission Court. He expressed dislike to the surplice, derided bowing towards the altar, disparaged the High Commission Court, expressed dislike of the sentence against Prynne, approved Henry Burton's book, and disparaged Dr. Heylin's answer, threatened to stone William Churchman, priest, for having, as he said, committed idolatry in bowing towards the Holy Table, with many other offences of the like kind. [2½ pp.]
83. Rate made at Chingford, Essex, for payment of the account of John Burnett, churchwarden, for expenses about the church and chancel, for bread and wine for the communion, for maimed soldiers, for a new communion-table and rails. The total was 14l. 6s. 8d., but exceptions were taken to the charges for the table, rails, and other things, as being excessive, and bought without advising with the parish, wherefore the rate was made for 10l. 11s. 10d. [Signed by twelve persons. 2 pp.]
84. Reasons assigned by the churchwardens of Beckington, Somerset, for refusal to remove the communion table from the place where it stands and has stood since the Reformation. [¾ p.]
85. Brief of money received by Sir Edmond Sawyer, and promised to be paid in the future in the forest division of Berks, towards repairs of St. Paul's. Paid 119l. 18s. 7d. Promised 111l. 6s. 8d. [22/3 pp.]
86. Certificate of Inigo Jones, of the barks constantly employed to bring stone from the Isle of Portland for repair of St. Paul's, with the names of the masters and mariners, and application for their freedom from impressment. [1¼ p.]
87. Copy of part of a letter from Bishop Curle, of Winchester [to Archbishop Laud], on the cause of the waste of wood on the lands of the bishopric of Winchester. All the copyhold tenants of the bishopric pretend a custom that they may fell what timber they will. Another cause is the covenant in the leases to find timber out of the bishop's wood for repairing houses and mills. Sir Daniel Norton, for such reparation, has demanded 83 tons, and because I refused him he has cut down 40 oaks in my woods, the lease whereof expires at Michaelmas next. In renewing leases I have taken care to quit myself from that covenant. If his Majesty laid his command upon me that I should not renew any leases with that clause, it would be an answer to the importunities of such tenants as press me. [In the handwriting of William Dell. 1 p.]
88. Brief in a cause [in the Court of High Commission], wherein James Finch was plaintiff, and Hugh Nordway alias Nordwell defendant. The question in the cause was which of the said parties was the father of an illegitimate child of Anna Wittam, a servant of James Finch. [Imperfect. = 19 pp.]
89. Brief in a cause in the Court of Arches between Hugh Wynn and Morgan Williams as to the right to a particular seat and burial place in the church of Lanvuda [Llanvedw, co. Glamorgan ?] [Last sheet imperfect. 22 pp.]
90. Description of the glebe lands of the rectory of Carlton Curliew, co. Leicester, conveyed to the parson and his successors by Sir John Bale and other freeholders. [1 p.]
91. Petition of William Dillon, clerk, and doctor of law, to the King. Petitioner, having heard some speeches from Bishop Williams of Lincoln, concerning matters of state, derogatory to his Majesty's proceedings, and also being privy to some sinister actions of the bishop, yet because he was a man of great place, your subject his chaplain had been fearful and unwilling to disclose the same; but remembering a subject's allegiance, petitioner could no longer conceal the truth contained in articles stated to be annexed. Prays order for examination of the premises, and protection against the bishop's power, in the prosecution of this complaint. [2/3 p.]
92. List of witnesses in Dr. Dillon's cause against Bishop Williams of Lincoln. [1 p.]
93. Petition of Edward Hastler, rector of Bignor, in diocese of Chichester, to the Council. Upon the petition annexed, the Lords gave direction to Mr. Nicholas to declare to Lord Chief Justice Finch that no further proceedings should be taken in the said cause till his Majesty and the Lords were further informed. In regard the cause concerns the church in point of tithes withheld, and that his Majesty is patron of the rectory, petitioner prays appointment for a hearing. [2/3 p.] Annexed,
93. i. Petition of the same to the same. William Pellet stands seised of 200 acres in Bignor, which heretofore was a park, but for 40 years has been arable and coppice, and by that means has become titheable. Petitioner being forced to sue in the Ecclesiastical Court for the tithe, Pellet procured a rule in the Common Pleas for a prohibition. Petitioner by his counsel gave satisfaction, and it was ordered, in the absence of the Lord Chief Justice, that no prohibition should be granted, yet shortly after petitioner was again warned to appear in the Common Pleas, and there being persuaded by his Lordship consented to a trial at Common Law, but upon better advice, finding the church (in his Majesty's gift) like to suffer by going to such a trial, petitioner prays the Lords to take a course for stay of the trial and relief of petitioner. [1 p.]
94. Petition of Thomas Wheatley, Thomas Hill, and John Coggin to the Council. Richard Massey, clerk, having exhibited a petition against petitioners and other his parishioners, petitioners protest that they so much reverence Mr. Massey, their minister, his coat and function, that they are unwilling to publish his weaknesses, but desire the Lords to cast their eyes on a certificate annexed. Mr. Massey has vexed petitioners at the sessions for the county, at the assizes, in the Ecclesiastical Court at Lincoln, by supplicavit in the Chancery, in the High Commission Court and in the Star Chamber, and now at this Board, for one and the same cause. Touching his pretence that petitioners are actors of a division betwixt him and his wife, he has himself occasioned that discontent by questioning her in the Ecclesiastical Court for incontinency, at the sessions for murder, and at the assizes for felony, yet could never make anything appear against her, and keeps her without livelihood for her and his three children. She having a suit now depending for alimony, petitioners deposed therein, which has occasioned this complaint. Pray reference to the justices of assize to certify the truth. [1 p.]
95. Petition of John Bul, prisoner in Old Bridewell, to Archbishop Laud. Has been committed by your Commissioners a year, where he has endured many months' labour of beating hemp, to the afflicting of his weak body, and the being companion of all manner of rogues, to the vexation of his soul. Prays to appear before you to answer for himself. If he be a false prophet, it is your duty to deal with him as the word of God requires. It is his only desire to be brought to trial. His suit is that you would consider the doom of that man of sin which the prophet Isaiah denounces in his 14th chapter and 17th verse, "for he opened not the house of his prisoners." [1 p.]
96. Petition of Francis Whitaker, yeoman of the guard, to the same. Four years since petitioner lodged in his house for seven months James Rotherford, a Scot, parson of Covenham Mary, co. Lincoln, with his wife, three children, and a maid. Rotherford departed in petitioner's debt 20 marks, whereof 4l. petitioner lent him out of purse. Having in like manner deceived many others, Rotherford still skulks in obscure corners about London, under the pretended name of Dr. Rotherford, and is defamed to be a cheating and cozening companion, and of so lewd and incontinent a life as is not fit to be specified. Prays a sequestration to be awarded for recovery of the debt out of Rotherford's rectory. [2/3 p.]
97. Petition of Thomas Ridges, of Newport Pagnel, plumber, to the same. Bishop Williams of Lincoln granted petitioner letters of commendation to all parsons in the archdeaconries of Huntingdon, Leicester, Buckingham, and Bedford, that petitioner might be employed in repairing the roofs of the churches. By suspension of the bishop the letters commendatory are not of any effect. Petitioner, having provided lead and other materials, prays the archbishop to grant him similar letters of commendation. [2/3 p.]
98. Philip Pregion, son of John Pregion, late registrar of the diocese of Lincoln, to Archbishop Laud. Ever since his father's death, petitioner has executed the office of registrar, but by reason of the suspension of the bishop is now suspended from the same. Prays the archbishop to restore him to the said office, being the only means of livelihood of his mother and her eight children. [⅓ p.]
99. Petition of the parishioners of Allhallows Barking, near the Tower of London, to the same. Of late years our parish church has been repaired, and the communion table as before placed and railed about according to the laws and customs of the Church of England. Now there is a new font erected, over which certain carved images and a cross are placed, and also our communion table is removed out of its ancient accustomed place, and certain images placed over the rail which stands about the table, all which, as we conceive, tends much to the dishonour of God and is very offensive to us parishioners and also perilous. We have desired our doctor to give way, that the images might be taken down, yet he refuses so to do. Petitioners pray the archbishop to command that the images may be taken down, and the communion table be restored to its place. [1 p.]
100. Petition of Gabriel More, prebendary of St. Peter's, Westminster, to the Commissioners for that collegiate church. By our local statutes every prebend has his peculiar stall, according to which he is to have his precedence, which is denied to petitioner. By the same statute, all materials for repair of prebendaries houses are to be allowed by the college, which is likewise denied to petitioner. Prays to be righted in the premises. [2/3 p.]
101. Petition of Christopher Withins of Eltham to Sir John Lambe. Petitioner's wife having preferred articles in the High Commission, pretending cruelty and adultery committed by him, gained an order for receiving the use of 200l. for maintenance of herself and two children, and also that she should have half her household goods. All which has been performed. Further she demands 8l. costs, which she has received with interest. By reason of compounding a bond which she secretly took from petitioner for 200l., and pretending that petitioner has not performed his order, an attachment is granted against him, to his and his children's utter undoing, if you do not intervene. Prays enquiry as to performance of the order, and that the attachment may be dissolved. [¾ p.]
102. Petition of Thomas Webb, clothier, to the same. Petitioner was censured in the Court of High Commission, the cause being prosecuted ex officio, and costs and charges taxed at 80l. Upon repair to Archbishop Laud, he conceived the costs to be exceedingly over-taxed, and ordered the same to be moderated, the crime of petitioner not being great. Prays Sir John to shew him what lawful favour he can. [½ p.]
103. Petition of John Warren, shoemaker, of Olney, to Sir John Lambe. Is brought up to London by attachment for absenting himself from his parish church, for which he is heartily sorry. Purposes a full reformation and careful obedience to the canons of the church. His offence being out of ignorance, and no faction, and himself very poor, he prays stay of proceedings, and to appoint him to attend Sir John in the country. [½ p.]
104. Petition of John Downame, parson, the churchwarden, and others, of Allhallows-the-Great, in London, to the same, concerning the suit of Revell against Bryan and his wife. It is three years since Bryan's wife was first presented, which suit has cost the parish above 20l. The offences are so odious, so apparent, and against the church door, that it has brought much scandal to the parish. If Bryan and his wife commute, pray that the poor in their parish may be remembered, and that an end may be given to the suit this term. Signed by the parson, churchwardens, and nine others. [1 p.]
105. Petition of James Chadwick, clerk, rector of Stanley Regis, co. Gloucester, to the same. A sequestration of the rectory of Stanley Regis was referred to the Commissioners at Informations by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Petitioner has served the cure there three quarters of a year, and during that time has paid tenths, shipmoneys, procurations, and synodals, also eight groats monthly to the poor, and has not received any of the profits by reason of a pretended lease, there being due to him 40l. at least. Petitioner being unable to prosecute the suit, having spent 20l. in the keep of himself and horse nine weeks, besides paying 5l. to a curate during his absence, prays relief. [½ p.]
106. Petition of Robert Edmonds, of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, to the same. Petitioner is molested by Mary Sheppard, wife of Richard Sheppard, for words confessed by him before Dr. Swalman, late official to the Archdeacon of Middlessex, being before him convented for adultery with Mary Sheppard, for which crime he had performed public penance, but she has not yet undergone any ecclesiastical censure. Prays that she may be cited to answer for her offence. [1 p.]
107. Petition of John Brewer and Richard Glover, churchwardens of St Katherine Creechurch, London, to the same. The Council appointed that a certificate should be made by the churchwardens of every parish, whether there were any selected vestry or no, whereupon John Bill, who, notwithstanding he was inhibited, officiated as churchwarden, made a return, which has occasioned a suit, long depending before you, as to whether all the men of the said parish or but some be a vestry. In respect of the unquietness that has been and is likely to be, for the relieved in short time will, being many, be assessors of the relievers, if all be a vestry, petitioners pray a reference to the Council, whence the ground of the suit arose. [2/3 p.]
108. Statement of changes in the tithes of Creeton and Castle Bytham, co. Lincoln, resulting from inclosure. [½ p.]
109. Indictment found against Thomas Newcombe, or Newcomen, parson of St. Runwalds, in Colchester, under a statute of the 1st Elizabeth, for not reading prayers and administering the sacraments according to the Book of Common Prayer. [Copy. 1½. p.] Annexed,
109. i. Opinion of Sir John Lambe that the indictment could not be maintained. The charges against the defendant related to the position of the communion table, the minister's standing at the north end thereof, his causing the communicants to come to the rail to receive the sacrament, his refusing to administer to those who came not to the rail. [On the same paper is written what is apparently an extract from a letter of a sheriff, on the unwillingness with which a second payment of the ship-money was paid in his county. 1½ p.]
110. List of benefices in the collation and presentation of the Archbishop of Canterbury, with the values thereof, arranged alphabetically, with several additions in the handwriting of William Dell, secretary to Archbishop Laud. [A paper roll. 4 pp.]
111. Account of tenths payable from various livings in cos. Leicester, Huntingdon, Hertford, Bedford, Buckingham, and Lincoln, probably those within the bishopric of Lincoln. They are arranged in deaneries. From the marginal notes it would seem that the account was originally prepared in 1616, but by subsequent additions and corrections of Sir John Lambe, one of which is dated in this year, it may be inferred it was used at this time, perhaps, by the Commissioners appointed to exercise episcopal jurisdiction during the suspension of the bishop. [79 pp.]